19
Polytechnic Univ ersity, Brooklyn , NY ©2002 by H.L. Bertoni 1 X. Numerical Integration for Propagation Past Rows of Buildings Adapting the physical optics integrals for numerical evaluation • Applications Computed height dependence of the fields Buildings with flat roofs Buildings of random height, spacing Rows of building on hills Trees located next to buildings Penetration through buildings at low frequencies

Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, NY ©2002 by H.L. Bertoni1 X. Numerical Integration for Propagation Past Rows of Buildings Adapting the physical optics

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, NY

©2002 by H.L. Bertoni 1

X. Numerical Integration for Propagation Past Rows of Buildings

• Adapting the physical optics integrals for numerical evaluation

• Applications– Computed height dependence of the fields

– Buildings with flat roofs

– Buildings of random height, spacing– Rows of building on hills

– Trees located next to buildings

– Penetration through buildings at low frequencies

Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, NY

©2002 by H.L. Bertoni 2

Numerical Integration for Field Variation in 2D

H(xn+1,yn+1) =ejπ / 4

λH(xn,yn)

jke−jkρn

ρndyn

hn

∫ , ρn = (xn+1 −xn)2 +(yn+1 −yn)

2

• How to terminate the numerical integration without changing the computed field– Abrupt termination like an absorbing screen above the termination point.

– Make the field go smoothly to zero above the significant region

• Discretize the integral in step size of at least /2

n

n

yn

x

n=1 n=2 n=3 n n+1

E

H

Incidentwave

yn+1

dn

Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, NY

©2002 by H.L. Bertoni 3

Termination Strategy• Multiply Hn(yn) by the neutralizer function (yn) to smoothly reduce the integration to

zero in order to avoid the spurious contribution given by abrupt termination of the integral.

η yn( )=

1 for yn <yc

exp− yn −yc( )2/w2

[ ] ; yc <yn <yc +3w

0 for yn >yc +3w

⎨ ⎪

⎩ ⎪

yc >Ndtanα + Ndλ secα3w

exp−yn −yc( )2/w2

[ ]

Hn yn( ) η yn( )

Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, NY

©2002 by H.L. Bertoni 4

Discretization

Hn+1 yn+1( )=e jπ /4

λη yn( )Hn yn( )

e−jkρn

ρndyn

0

ym

where

ρn = xn+1 −xn( )2+ yn+1 −yn( )

2

Define

φ yn( ) =∠Hn yn( )−kρn and A yn( )=η yn( )Hn yn( )1λρn

Then

Hn+1 yn+1( )=e jπ /4 A yn( )ejφ yn( )dyn

(m+1)Δ

∫m=0

M

∑Using the linear approximations

φ yn( ) ≈φ mΔ( )+ φ mΔ+Δ( )−φ mΔ( )[ ]yn −mΔ

Δ

A yn( ) ≈A mΔ( )+ A mΔ+Δ( )−A mΔ( )[ ]yn −mΔ

Δ

Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, NY

©2002 by H.L. Bertoni 5

Discretization - cont.

The integration in each interval can be evaluated in closed form so that

Hn+1 pΔ( ) =Δe jπ /4 A mΔ+Δ( )e jφ mΔ +Δ( ) −A mΔ( )eφ mΔ( )

φ mΔ+Δ( )−φ mΔ( )

⎧ ⎨ ⎩ m=0

M

+jA mΔ+Δ( )−A mΔ( )

φ mΔ+Δ( )−φ mΔ( )[ ]2 e jφ mΔ+Δ( ) −eφ mΔ( )[ ]

⎫ ⎬ ⎭

Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, NY

©2002 by H.L. Bertoni 6

Height Variation of the Field Above the M=120 Row of Buildings for Plane Wave Incidence

(= 1o, d = 50 m, f = 900 MHz, M = 120 > N0 )

Dashed curve for y < 0 is ( ) θTp DgQ )(2

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8|H

(y)|

-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Height in wavelength y/

K.H.UTD

Q(gp)

Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, NY

©2002 by H.L. Bertoni 7

Standing Wave Behavior for y > 0 (= 1o, d = 50 m, f = 900 MHz, M = 120 > N0 )

|H(y

)|

Height in wavelength y/

0.00.20.40.60.81.01.21.41.61.8

-30-20-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60

y

Height variation e jκy +Γe−jκy =1+Γe−j2κy where κ =ksinα

Separation Δy between minima is 2κΔy=2π or

Δy=π κ =π ksinα =λ 2sinα

For α =1o, Δy=28.6λ

Also, 1+Γ ≈1.6 and 1- Γ ≈0.4 so that Γ ≈0.6

Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, NY

©2002 by H.L. Bertoni 8

Side View of Buildings With Different Roofs- Representation by Absorbing Screens -

Representation of (a) and (c) by absorbing screen for Tx and Rx at rooftop height

(a) (b) (c)

w

TxRx

RxTx

d

Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, NY

©2002 by H.L. Bertoni 9

Effect of Roof Shape on Reduction Factor QComputed Midway Between Rows

Constant offset of 3.3 dBbetween two case (a) and (c),but no change in range index n.

Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, NY

©2002 by H.L. Bertoni 10

Shadow Fading

• Variation from building-to-building along along a row

• Variation from row-to-row

• Why the shadow fading is lognormal ?

Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, NY

©2002 by H.L. Bertoni 11

Shadow Fading Due to Variations in Building Height Along the Rows

As the subscriber moves along street, the received signal passes over buildings of different height, or misses the last row of buildings

Stre

et a

ndsi

de w

alks

Subscriber

From base station

Full width of Fresnel

zone near one end of link:

2wF =2 λs

For 900 MHz at mid street

s=20 m, λ =1 3 m

2wF =5.2 m

about the width of a house

Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, NY

©2002 by H.L. Bertoni 12

Shadow Fading for Propagation PastSuccessive Rows of Different Height

From base station

Because the width of the Fresnel zone is on the order of the width of the buildings, the random embodiments of buildings along the propagation path for mobiles located between different rows have the same statistical distribution as the embodiments along the propagation path for different mobile locations along a row.

Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, NY

©2002 by H.L. Bertoni 13

Modeling Shadow Fading for Random Building Height

IncidentPlane wave

x

y

• Building height determined by random number generator

• Use numerical integration to find fields at successive screen, mobiles

Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, NY

©2002 by H.L. Bertoni 14

Row-to-Row Variation of Rooftops FieldDue to Random Building Height

Plane wave incidence ( f = 900 MHz, = 0.5º, d = 50 m )HB uniformly distributed 8 - 14 m

1.0

0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.0100 110 120 130 140 150

Screen number

H( y

)

Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, NY

©2002 by H.L. Bertoni 15

Cumulative Distribution Functions for Receive Power at Rooftop and Street Level

Plane wave incidence ( f = 900 MHz, = 0.5º, d = 50 m )HB uniformly distributed 8 - 14 m

1.0

0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.0-50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0

Field (dB)

CD

F

(At mobile)Mean = -34.68Std = 4.22

(At rooftop)Mean = -11.49Std = 5.77

Because the distributions are nearly a straight line for a linear vertical scale, the CDF’s are nearly those of a uniform distribution. Addition sources of variation are needed to get a lognormal distribution.

Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, NY

©2002 by H.L. Bertoni 16

Missing Buildings, Roof Shape and BuildingMaterials Also Cause Signal Variation

Additional sources of variability that influence diffraction down to the mobile are roof characteristics and construction, and the absence of buildings in a row, such as at and intersection. For simulations we assume: 50% peaked, 50% flat 50% conducting, 50% absorbing boundary conditions 10% of buildings are missing

hBS hm

HB

d

Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, NY

©2002 by H.L. Bertoni 17

Cumulative Distribution Function for Combinationof Random Height and Other Random Factor

CDF of the received power at Street levelfor:

f = 900 MHz = 0.5°d = 40 mHB distribution is Uniform Rayleigh Nearly straight line for the distorted vertical scale indicates a Normal distribution of power in dB.

Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, NY

©2002 by H.L. Bertoni 18

Dependence of Standard Deviation of Signal Distribution on HB for 900 MHz and 1.8 GHz

Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, NY

©2002 by H.L. Bertoni 19

Why Shadow Fading is Lognormal Distributed

• Sequence of random processes, each of which multiply the signal by a random number: - Random building height - Random diffraction down to mobile due to roof shape, construction, missing buildings

• On dB scale, multiplication of random numbers is equal to addition of their logs

• By central limit theorem of random statistics, a sum of random numbers has normal (Gaussian) distribution

• Adding just two random numbers gives normal distribution, except in tails