34
Polycom Competitive Q1 08

Polycom vs Tandberg Comparison Q1 2008

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Polycom vs Tandberg Comparison Q1 2008

Polycom Competitive Q1 08

Page 2: Polycom vs Tandberg Comparison Q1 2008

confidential

Polycom Competitive Objectives

Polycom Solution vs. TandbergTandberg Overall SolutionHDX 9000 vs. Tandberg 6000 MXPHDX 8000 vs. Tandberg Edge 95 MXPHDX 7000 vs. Tandberg Edge 85/75HDX 4000 vs. Tandberg 1700 MXPRMX 2000 vs. Tandberg Codian 4500Media Center/Exec collection vs. Tandberg Profile

Page 3: Polycom vs Tandberg Comparison Q1 2008

Polycom Solution vs. Competitors

Page 4: Polycom vs Tandberg Comparison Q1 2008

confidential

Polycom Video Solution

Voice, Video Endpoints & TelePresence

Conference Bridge

Management &Scheduling

Video Recording, Streaming & Content Management Security & NAT/FW

Traversal

1 Partner Integration

2

34 5

6

Page 5: Polycom vs Tandberg Comparison Q1 2008

confidential

Polycom Video Product Overview:

Professional Performance Mainstream Entry Office

HDX 9000VSX 7000e

VSX 7000sVSX 6000

VSX 5000

V500

HDX 4000

VSX 3000

V700

VSX 8000

HDX 8000 HDX7000RealPresence™ (RPX & TPX)

1

Page 7: Polycom vs Tandberg Comparison Q1 2008

confidential

Tandberg Solution Overview

1

2

3

4

5

6

HD Voice, HD Video, HD ContentTips or Traps on MXP: MXP products are Not a TRUE HD Solution requires (RCDO) & Static Macro blocking for HD Video, NO HD Voice or Content.

Conference BridgeTips or Traps on Codian 4200, 4500 and MPS: Limited functionality in HD environments on MPS, NO ISDN on Codian, RMX 20HD or 80CIF or 400Voice vs. 4500 20CIF or 20HD, MXP endpoints will not receive HD from the 4500

Management & Scheduling ApplicationTips or Traps on TMS: SE200 has a built-in Gatekeeper vs. TMS uses an external Gatekeeper, SE200 shows GK/GD registration status in UI; TMS does not, SE200 can push GD to Polycom VSX and HDX as well as to Tandberg MPX EPs, SE200 allows user-to-device association; TMS doesn’t, TMS is not IMS-architected, RMX is part of the Polycom IMS portfolio

Recording, Streaming and Content ManagementTips or Traps on Content Server: The Tandberg Content Server has not access & search capabilities, streaming scalability, low storage capacity 120GB vs. 250GB on RSS2000 & 750GB on VMC

Conferencing Network Security SolutionsTips and Traps on Border Controller: The Tandberg Border Controller is not a complete network security solution, it only support H.460 standard, the Polycom V2IU supports H.460 and H.323 annex O

Enterprise Collaboration IntegrationTips and Traps: Requires TMS to integrate with all partner solutions.

Not Supported

Partial SupportSupported

Page 8: Polycom vs Tandberg Comparison Q1 2008

Polycom HDX vs. Competitors

Page 9: Polycom vs Tandberg Comparison Q1 2008

confidential

Wainhouse 2007 evaluation of HD Video Conferencing

Three Leading Contenders Face Off - October 2007

Web Link : http://www.wrplatinum.com/Content.aspx?CID=7951

Page 10: Polycom vs Tandberg Comparison Q1 2008

confidential

Polycom HDX 9000

#1 HD Video conferencing codec by Wainhouse ResearchPolycom UltimateHD

HD Voice– Acoustic Clarity– Wide band High Fidelity– Polycom 22 kHz StereoSurround™

HD Video– 720p video– H.264 Standard-Based– Multiple HD Sources– Performance Eagle Eye Camera– AES Encryption

HD Content– H.239 Standard Based– Full-Motion HD Dual Streams– Movies, Pictures, Documents– People On Content & People + Content IP

Professional IO– 4 Video Outputs– 5 Video Inputs– 4 Digital Mic Array– 3 In & 2 Out Phoenix Audio– 1G/100/10 LAN

Polycom HDX 9000

Page 11: Polycom vs Tandberg Comparison Q1 2008

confidential

Polycom HDX 9000 vs. Tandberg 6000 MXP

Not a TRUE HD Solution Camera & Video Quality

Tiling and Blocking Video QualityYellowish video colorLoad Camera NoisesUnable to maintain full 30fps in HD

– (requires Reduced Complexity Decoding Operation (RCDO) and Static Macro blocking

Requires external TANDBERG Video Switch (TVS) for multiple camerasProprietary Camera ConnectionNO 30fps with 108k macroblocks/sec,only max of 35k macroblocks/sec

NO HD VoiceNO HD ContentTandberg IPLR (Intelligent Packet Loss Recovery)

Users experience poor audio and video on less than premium networks Polycom HDX 9000

Tandberg 6000 MXP

Page 12: Polycom vs Tandberg Comparison Q1 2008

confidential

HDX 9000 vs. Tandberg MXP 6000/3000

HDX 9002 HDX 9004 MXP 6000 MXP 3000Max data rates H.323

SIPISDN

2 Mbps (4Mbps option)

2 Mbps (4Mbps option)

2 Mbps

4 Mbps

4 Mbps

2 Mbps

4 Mbps

4 Mbps

512 kbps

2 Mbps

2 Mbps

512 kbps

Content sharing H.239P+C IP

POC

Yes – PC or MAC

YesYes

Yes – PC or MAC

YesYes

Yes~VNCNo

Yes~VNCNo

Audio 22kHzStereoSurround

YesYes

YesYes

20 kHz MPEG-4 AAC

No20 kHz MPEG-4 AAC

No

Video 1280x720 resolution30fps (108k macroblocks/sec)

Yes

YesYes

YesYes

NoYes

No

Camera Video Quality Zoom

Full Motion, True colors, 12x

Full Motion, True colors, 12x

Tiling MotionYellow Video, 7x

Tiling Motion, Yellow Video, 7x

Int. Multipoint @ 4 x 1,288 kbps 8 x 1 Mbps6 x 1.3 Mbps

6 x 768 kbps4 x 2 Mbps

4 x 768kbps

Bandwidth 4CIF (SD)HD

Up to 960Kbps

1 – 4 Mbps

Up to 960Kbps

1 – 4 Mbps

Up to 960Kbps

1 – 4Mbps

Up to 960Kbps

1 – 2Mbps

Lost Packet Recovery Yes Yes Yes (weak functionality) Yes (weak functionality)

IO/Backpanel InOut

4 (4HD or 3HD & 1SD)3 (2HD, 1SD or 3SD)

5 (5HD or 4HD & 1SD)4 (3HD, 1SD or 4SD)

5 (2HD, 3SD)2 (2HD or 2SD)

4 (2HD, 2SD)2 (2HD or 2SD)

Page 13: Polycom vs Tandberg Comparison Q1 2008

confidential

Tandberg HD I/O & Back Panel Disadvantages

If the proprietary HD camera is connected the S-Video input is disabled

No Stereo Input or Output

Limited to 2 monitor support

1 Proprietary HD Camera input(requires video switch for multiple HD camera inputs)

Page 14: Polycom vs Tandberg Comparison Q1 2008

confidential

Tandberg VNC vs. Polycom People+Content IP

VNC PC configuration

Endpoint Configuration per PC connection

People+Content IPconnect and share

no configuring the endpoint

Page 15: Polycom vs Tandberg Comparison Q1 2008

confidential

Polycom HDX 8000

Polycom HDX 8000

Polycom UltimateHDHD Voice

– Acoustic Clarity– Wide band High Fidelity– Polycom 22 kHz StereoSurround™

HD Video– 720p video– H.264 Standard-Based– Multiple HD Sources– Performance Eagle Eye Camera– AES Encryption

HD Content– H.239 Standard Based– Full-Motion HD Dual Streams– Movies, Pictures, Documents– People On Content

Professional IO– 2 Video Outputs– 3 Video Inputs– 4 Digital Mic Array– 3 In & 2 Out Audio– 1G/100/10 LAN

Page 16: Polycom vs Tandberg Comparison Q1 2008

confidential

Polycom HDX 8000 vs. Tandberg Edge 95 MXP

Tandberg Edge

Limited to 2Mbps in H.323 & SIP

Limited to 512kbps in H.320

No StereoSurround Audio

Video QualityTiling and Blocking Video QualityYellowish video colorLoad Camera noisesProprietary Camera ConnectionNO 30fps with 108k macroblocks/sec,only max of 35k macroblocks/secUnable to maintain full 30fps in HD

– (requires Reduced Complexity Decoding Operation (RCDO) and Static Macroblocking

Tandberg IPLR (Intelligent Packet Loss Recovery)

Users experience poor audio and video on less than premium networks

Polycom HDX 8000

Page 17: Polycom vs Tandberg Comparison Q1 2008

confidential

HDX 8000 series vs. Tandberg Edge series

HDX 8002 HDX 8004 Edge 95Max data rates H.323

SIPISDN

2 Mbps (*4Mbps)

2 Mbps (*4Mbps)

2 Mbps

4 Mbps4 Mbps2 Mbps

2 Mbps

2 Mbps

512 kbps

Content sharing H.239P+C IP

POC

Yes – PC or MAC

YesYes

Yes – PC or MAC

YesYes

Yes

~VNCNo

Audio 22kHzStereoSurround

YesYes

YesYes

20 kHz MPEG-4 AAC

No

Video 1280x720 resolution30fps (108k macroblocks/sec)

YesYes

YesYes

Yes with RCDO (Interop Issues)No

Camera Video Quality

Zoom

Full MotionTrue colors 12x

Full MotionTrue colors 12x

Tiling MotionYellow VideoLoud Cam Noises7x

Int. Multipoint 4 sites @ 1,288 kbps 1,288 kbps 768 kbps

Bandwidth 4CIF (SD)HD

Up to 960Kbps

1 – 2 or 4Mbps

Up to 960Kbps

1 – 4Mbps

Up to 1.1 Mbps

1.1 or 1.4 – 2Mbps

Lost Packet Recovery Yes Yes Yes (weak functionality)

IO/Backpanel InOut

3 (2HD, 1SD)2 (1HD, 1SD)

4 (3HD, 1SD)3 (2HD, 1SD)

5 (2HD, 3SD)4 (1HD, 3SD)

Page 18: Polycom vs Tandberg Comparison Q1 2008

confidential

Polycom HDX 7000

Polycom HDX 7000

Polycom UltimateHDHD Voice

– Acoustic Clarity– Wide band High Fidelity– Polycom 22 kHz StereoSurround™

HD Video– 720p video– H.264 Standard-Based– Multiple HD Sources– Performance Eagle Eye Camera– AES Encryption

HD Content– H.239 Standard Based– Full-Motion HD Dual Streams– Movies, Pictures, Documents– People On Content

Professional IO– 2 Video Outputs– 3 Video Inputs– 4 Digital Mic Array– 3 In & 2 Out Audio– 1G/100/10 LAN

Page 19: Polycom vs Tandberg Comparison Q1 2008

confidential

Polycom HDX 7000 vs. Tandberg Edge 85/75 MXP

Limited to 1.5Mbps in H.323 & SIP

Limited to 512kbps in H.320

No StereoSurround Audio

Video QualityTiling and Blocking Video QualityYellowish video colorLoad Camera noisesUnable to maintain full 30fps in HD

– (requires Reduced Complexity Decoding Operation (RCDO) and Static Macro blocking

Tandberg IPLR (Intelligent Packet Loss Recovery)

Users experience poor audio and video on less than premium networks Polycom HDX 7000

Page 20: Polycom vs Tandberg Comparison Q1 2008

confidential

HDX 7000 vs. Tandberg Edge 85 & 75

HDX 7002 HDX 7001 Edge 85 Edge 75

Max data rates H.323SIP

ISDN

2 Mbps2 Mbps 2 Mbps

2 Mbps2 Mbps2 Mbps

1.1 Mbps1.1 Mbps384 kbps

768 kbps768 kbps128 kbps

Content sharing H.239P+C IP

Yes – PC or MACYes

Yes – PC or MACYes

Yes

~VNCYes

~VNC

Audio 22kHzStereoSurround

YesYes

YesYes

NoNo

NoNo

Video 1280x720 resolution30fps (108k macroblocks/sec)

YesYes

YesYes

Yes

NoNo

No

Camera Video Quality

Zoom

Full MotionTrue colors

12x

Full MotionTrue colors

12x

Tiling MotionYellow VideoLoud Cam Noises7x

Tiling MotionYellow VideoLoud Cam Noises7x

Int. Multipoint @ 4 x 1,288 kbps 4 x 1,288 kbps 4 x 768 kbps 4 x 768 kbps

Bandwidth 4CIF (SD)HD

Up to 960Kbps

1 – 2Mbps

Up to 2 Mbps Up to 1.1 Mbps

1.1768 kbpsNo

IO/Back panel InOut

3 (2HD, 1SD)3 (2HD, 1SD)

3 (2HD, 1SD)3 (2HD, 1SD)

5 (2HD, 3SD)4 (1HD, 3SD)

5 (2HD, 3SD)4 (1HD, 3SD)

Page 21: Polycom vs Tandberg Comparison Q1 2008

confidential

HDX 7000 vs. Tandberg Edge

DVI-I output capable of

HDMI, DVI, VGA & YPbPr

(digital and analog signal)

DVI-I output capable of

VGA & DVI

Input is standards based

capable of YPbPr, DVI

Composite S-Video

Input is a proprietary connection

only the Tandberg Camera

and requires video switcher for

multiple HD cameras

Page 22: Polycom vs Tandberg Comparison Q1 2008

confidential

Polycom HDX 4000

Polycom HDX 4000

Polycom UltimateHDHD Voice

– Acoustic Clarity– Wide band High Fidelity– Polycom 22 kHz StereoSurround™

HD Video– 720p video– H.264 Standard-Based– Multiple HD Sources– Performance Eagle Eye Camera– AES Encryption– (LPR) Loss Packet Recovery

HD Content– H.239 Standard Based– Full-Motion HD Dual Streams– Movies, Pictures, Documents– People On Content– People + Content IP

Page 23: Polycom vs Tandberg Comparison Q1 2008

confidential

Polycom HDX 4000 vs. Tandberg 1700 MXP

Tandberg 1700 MXP

No Keypad (only remote)HDX 4000 has an attached control pad with ease access and usability.

Weak Camera TechnologyAttached Camera (HDX 4000 Built In Camera)Manual Focus (HDX 4000 Fixed Focus)Manual PTZ (HDX 4000 EPTZ)

Limited to 2Mbps

No StereoSurround Audio

No ISDN

Tandberg IPLR (Intelligent Packet Loss Recovery)

Users experience poor audio and video on less than premium networks Polycom HDX 4000

Page 24: Polycom vs Tandberg Comparison Q1 2008

confidential

Polycom HDX 4000 vs. Tandberg 1700 MXP

HDX 4001 HDX 4002 Tandberg 1700Max data rates H.323

SIPISDN

2Mbps

2Mbps

2Mbps

4Mbps4Mbps2Mbps

2Mbps2Mbps

No

Content sharing H.239P+C IP

POC

Yes – PC or MACYesYes

Yes – PC or MACYesYes

Natural Presenter– PC VNC (PC & Codec configuring)

No

Audio 22kHzStereoSurround

YesYes

YesYes

20 kHz MPEG-4 AAC

No

Video 720p (1280x720) resolution30fps (108k macroblocks/sec)

EPTZ camera

No (SD only)

No (SD only)

Yes

YesYesYes

Yes with RCDO (Interop Issues)

No, 35k maxNo

Max display format 1680x1050 1680x1050 1280x720

Multipoint 4-Way @ 1,288 kbps 1,288 kbps 768kbps

Bandwidth 4CIF (SD)HD

Up to 2Mbps

Up to 2Mbps (optional)

Up to 960Kbps

1 – 4MbpsUp to 1.2Mbps

1.2 or 1.4 – 2Mbps

Lost Packet Recovery Yes Yes Yes (weak functionality)

Page 25: Polycom vs Tandberg Comparison Q1 2008

Polycom RMX/HDX vs. Tandberg (Codian)4500/MXP

Page 26: Polycom vs Tandberg Comparison Q1 2008

confidential

Supports new HDX 9000 series (SD, HD VS, HD CP)

Recording with RSS 2000

Integrates with PolycomRealPresence™ Experience

Scheduling and management portal to RMX; manages both MGC and RMX

HD Video

Superior Audio (14-22Khz)

HD RealPresence

ReadiManager SE200

MGC InteroperabilitySupports H.239, PoC

Polycom Global Support

HD is Not Just endpoints

HD Recording/Streaming

HD Telepresence

Integrates with Polycom Telepresence Experience™

Page 27: Polycom vs Tandberg Comparison Q1 2008

confidential

Polycom RMX vs. Tandberg (Codian) 4500

Who’s uses only HD conferences (1MB and higher) with the MCU?

NO ONE!!The RMX is the only HD MCU that will give you more resources and dynamically balance resources in a mixed environmentPort is a Port… not a great investment for mixed environmentsVideo Port required for Content:

From Codian documentation: Port usage, Port reservation modeIf the MCU is operating in reserved mode, enabling H.239 for a conference requires the use of an

additional video port. A single video port is needed for all content channel and H.239 operations,

RMX 4500

flexible resource allocation port is a port

20 HD, 80 CIF or 400 Voice 20 HD, 20 CIF or NO PSTN

VS.

Page 28: Polycom vs Tandberg Comparison Q1 2008

confidential

Polycom RMX vs. Tandberg (Codian) 4500

RMX 4500

Conference Profile MCU settingConference Profiles allows different

configurations for different conferencesAll conferences get forced to the same

Conference Setting:

For example with the 4500 the Motion / sharpness tradeoff, Speaker display and Conference speed is configured for all the conferences. With the RMX you can create different conference profiles for Groups or Users wanting Video Quality, Skins or # Participants.

Below are the 4500 MCU Setting that are forced on all conferences.

Maximum video size, Motion / sharpness tradeoff, Transmitted video resolutions Default bandwidth from MCU, Default bandwidth to MCU, Default view family

Use full screen view for two participants, Active speaker display Media port reservation, Audio notifications

VS.

Page 29: Polycom vs Tandberg Comparison Q1 2008

Polycom RPX, TPX, HDX Media Center/Exec vs. Tandberg Immersive, Experia & Profile

Page 31: Polycom vs Tandberg Comparison Q1 2008

confidential

Polycom RPX & TPX vs. Tandberg Immersive & Experia

Polycom RPX HD

•HD 720p video

•24:9 Aspect Ratio

• Multiple seamless 42” Rear Projection

• Forward facing seating

•Fixed position HD cameras

Polycom HDX

•HD 720p video

• 16:9 Aspect Ratio

•50” plasmas

•Long Conference Table Seating

•PTZ HD camera

Teliris VirtuaLive

•HD 720p video

•16:9 Aspect Ratio

•Up to 70” displays

•Long Conference Table Seating

•PTZ Cameras

Page 32: Polycom vs Tandberg Comparison Q1 2008

confidential

What’s the difference?

Teliris VirtuaLive Tandberg Experia

Polycom RPX is Immersive Telepresence

Page 33: Polycom vs Tandberg Comparison Q1 2008

confidential

Polycom RPX is Immersive Telepresence

• Standards based video

• Flexible room configurations

• Seamless displays

• Hidden technology

• Design symmetry

• True-to-life people dimensions

• Superb audio and visual experience

Page 34: Polycom vs Tandberg Comparison Q1 2008

Thank YouIf you require other competitive information please

contact Clint Anderson at [email protected]