Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
78
POLICY AWARENESS AND FAMILIARITY WITH
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
Knowledge policies are becoming an increasingly important element of
the Information Society and the knowledge economy. Such policies provide
institutional foundations for creating, managing, and using organizational
knowledge as well as social foundations for balancing global competitiveness
with social order and cultural values. Knowledge policies can be viewed from a
number of perspectives: the necessary linkage to technological evolution,
relative rates of technological and institutional change, as a control or regulatory
process, obstacles posed by cyberspace, and as an organizational policy
instrument.
From an organizational perspective, Simard (2000) states that “if
traditional policies are applied directly [to a digital environment], the Canadian
Forest Service could become marginalized in a dynamic knowledge-based
economy.” Consequently, the CFS developed and implemented an Access to
Knowledge Policy that "fosters the migration of the CFS towards providing free,
open access to its knowledge assets, while recognizing the need for cost
recovery and the need to impose restrictions on access in some cases" (Simard,
2005). The policy comprises a framework of objectives, guiding principles, staff
responsibilities, and policy directives. The directives include: ownership and
use; roles, rights, and responsibilities; levels of access and accessibility; service
to clients.
From a technological perspective, Thomas Jefferson (1816) noted that
laws and institutions must keep pace with progress of the human mind.
Institutions must advance as new discoveries are made, new truths are
discovered, and as opinions and circumstances change. Fast-forwarding to the
late 20th century, Martin (1985) stated that any society with a high level of
automation must frame its laws and safeguards so that computers can police
other computers. Tim Berners-Lee (2000) noted that both policy and technology
79
must be designed with an understanding of the implications of each other.
Finally, Sparr (2001) points out that rules will emerge in cyberspace because
even on the frontier, pioneers need property rights, standards, and rules of fair
play to protect them from pirates. Government is the only entity that can enforce
such rules, but they could be developed by others1.
The analysis on policy awareness and familiarity with the knowledge Management is as follows:
TABLE 4.1
Employee responses on Knowledge Management Policy for acquiring and sharing Knowledge
Company Agree Strongly Agree Total
Infosys Count 44 106 150
% within Company 29 71 100
Wipro Count 51 99 150
% within Company 34 66 100
Total Count 95 205 300 Total % 32 68 100
Source: field survey
CHI- SQUARE VALUE
Value df Table value
Pearson Chi-Square .755(b) 1 3.841
80
TABLE - 4.2
Employee responses on organization have a Value System or Culture to promote Knowledge Sharing
Company Uncertain Agree Strongly Agree Total
Infosys Count 0 59 91 150
% within Company 0 39 61 100
Wipro Count 2 59 89 150
% within Company 1 40 60 100
Total Count 2 118 180 300
Total % 7 40 60 100 Source: field survey
CHI- SQUARE VALUE
Value Df Table value
Pearson Chi-Square 2.022(a) 2 5.991
81
TABLE - 4.3 Employee responses on organisation using partnerships to acquire
Knowledge
Company Uncertain Agree Strongly
Agree Total
Infosys Count 15 33 102 150
% within Company 10 22 68 100.0
Wipro Count 11 34 105 150
% within Company
7 23 70 100
Total Count 26 67 207 300
Total % 9 22 69 100 Source: field survey
CHI- SQUARE VALUE
Value Df Table Value Pearson Chi-Square .674(a) 2 5.991
82
TABLE - 4.4 Employee responses on Organization has policies/programs to improve
worker retention
Company Disagree Un-certain Agree Strongly
Agree Total
Infosys Count 2 28 27 93 150
% within Company
1 19 18 62 100
Wipro Count 1 20 36 93 150
% within Company
1 13 24 62 100
Total Count 3 48 63 186 300
Total % 1 16 21 62 100 Source: field survey
CHI- SQUARE VALUE
Value Df Table Value Pearson Chi-Square 2.952(a) 3 7.815
83
TABLE - 4.5 Employee responses on Organization have advisory boards and internal
meeting to exchange Knowledge Company
Company Disagree Un-certain Agree Strongly
Agree Total
Infosys Count 2 28 27 93 150
% within Company 1 19 18 62 100
Wipro Count 1 20 36 93 150
% within Company 1 13 24 62 100
Total Count 3 48 63 186 300
Total % 1 16 21 62 100 Source: field survey
CHI- SQUARE VALUE
Value Df Table Value Pearson Chi-Square 1.443(a) 2 5.991
84
TABLE - 4.6 Employee responses encouragement of systematic Neighbour Trainining
and Inter Desciplinary training groups
Company Disagree Uncertain Agree Strongly Agree Total
Infosys Count 2 0 59 91 150
% within Company 1 0 39 61 100
Wipro Count 0 2 59 89 150
% within Company 0 1 39 60 100
Total Count 2 2 118 180 300
Total % 1 1 39 60 100
Source: field survey
CHI- SQUARE VALUE
Value Df Table Value Pearson Chi-Square 2.583(a) 3 7.815
85
TABLE 4.7 Employee responses on Value System or Culture intended to promote
Knowledge Sharing
Company Strongly Disagree Disagree Uncertain Agree Strongly
Agree Total
Infosys Count 2 1 35 25 78 150
% within Company 1 1 23 17 58 100
Wipro Count 0 1 29 32 88 150
% within Company 0 1 19 21 59 100
Total Count 2 2 64 57 175 300
Total % 1 1 21 19 58 100
Source: field survey
CHI- SQUARE VALUE
Value df Table Value Pearson Chi-Square 3.428(a) 4 9.488
86
TABLE - 4.8 Employee responses on Cooperation and trust to KM policy formulation
through out the Organization
Company Strongly Disagree Disagree Un-
certain Agree Strongly Agree Total
Infosys Count 1 2 17 52 78 150
% within Company .0 1 11 35 52 100
Wipro Count 0 0 17 55 78 150
% within Company 0 0 11 37 52 100
Total Count 1 2 34 107 156 300
Total % 0 1 11 36 52 100
Source: field survey
CHI- SQUARE VALUE
Value df Table Value Pearson Chi-Square 3.084(a) 4 9.488
87
TABLE - 4.9 Employee responses on Workers accepting activities designed to
acquire and share knowledge as part of their job
Company Uncertain Agree Strongly Agree Total
Infosys Count 23 33 94 150
% within Company 15 22 63 100
Wipro Count 21 43 86 150
% within Company 14 29 57 100
Total Count 44 76 180 300
Total % 15 25 60 100 Source: field survey
CHI- SQUARE VALUE
Value df Table Value Pearson Chi-Square 1.762 2 5.991
88
TABLE - 4.10 Employee responses on meetings are used as a means of transferring
Knowledge
Company Strongly Disagree Disagree Un-
certain Agree Strongly Agree Total
Infosys Count 3 2 1 60 84 150
% within Company 2 1 1 40 56 100
Wipro Count 0 2 1 60 87 150
% within Company .0 1 1 40 58 100
Total Count 3 4 2 120 171 300
Total % 1 1 1 40 57 100
Source: field survey
CHI- SQUARE VALUE
Value df Table Value Pearson Chi-Square 3.053(b) 4 9.488
89
Analysis of Tables from 4.1to4.10
From among the total respondents as mentioned in Table 4.1, 70% of
Infosys & 66%of Wipro strongly agree that they have knowledge management
policy for sharing knowledge. 29% of respondents of Infosys & 34% of Wipro
agree that they have knowledge management policy for sharing knowledge. The
chi-square test shows that there is no significant difference between opinions of
the respondents of Infosys and Wipro with regard to knowledge management
policy because the table value is less than calculated value at 5% level of
significance.
From among the total respondents as mentioned in Table 4.2, 61% of
Infosys & 60%of Wipro strongly agree that they have culture which intends to
promote knowledge sharing. 39% of respondents of Infosys & 40% of Wipro
agree that they have culture which intends to promote knowledge sharing. The
chi-square test shows that there is no significant difference between opinions of
the respondents of Infosys and Wipro on the above aspect because the table
value is less than calculated value at 5% level of significance.
From among the total respondents as mentioned in Table 4.3, 68% of
Infosys & 70%of Wipro strongly agree that they use partnerships or strategic
alliances to acquire Knowledge. 22% of respondents of Infosys & 23% of Wipro
agree that their company uses partnerships or strategic alliances to acquire
Knowledge but very few respondents of Infosys and Wipro are not certain with
regard to usage of partnerships or strategic alliances to acquire Knowledge. The
chi-square test shows that there is no significant difference between opinions of
the respondents of Infosys and Wipro with regard to usage of partnerships or
strategic alliances to acquire Knowledge because the table value is less than
calculated value at 5% level of significance
90
From among the total respondents as mentioned in Table 4.4, 62% of
Infosys & 62%of Wipro strongly agree that their organization have policies or
programmes to improve worker retention. 18% of respondents of Infosys & 24%
of Wipro agree that their organization have policies or programmes to improve
worker retention but very few respondents of Infosys and Wipro are not certain
with regard to their organization have policies or programme to improve worker
retention. The chi-square test shows that there is no significant difference
between opinions of the respondents of Infosys and Wipro with regard to the
above said statement because the table value is less than calculated value at 5%
level of significance.
From among the total respondents as mentioned in Table 4.5, 77% of
Infosys & 71%of Wipro strongly agree that their organizations have advisory
boards and internal meetings to exchange knowledge. 22% of respondents of
Infosys & 28% of Wipro agree that their organizations have advisory boards and
internal meetings to exchange knowledge. The chi-square test shows that there is
no significant difference between opinions of the respondents of Infosys and
Wipro with regard to above said statement because the table value is less than
calculated value at 5% level of significance.
From among the total respondents as mentioned in Table 4.6, 64% of
Infosys & 61%of Wipro strongly agree that organizations encourage systematic
neighbor training and interdisciplinary training groups. 39% of respondents of
Infosys & 39% of Wipro agree that organizations encourage systematic neighbor
training and interdisciplinary training groups. The chi-square test shows that
there is no significant difference between opinions of the respondents of Infosys
and Wipro with regard to above said statement because the table value is less
than calculated value at 5% level of significance.
From among the total respondents as mentioned in Table 4.7, 58% of
Infosys & 59%of Wipro strongly agree that they have knowledge management
91
policy for sharing knowledge. 29% of respondents of Infosys & 34% of Wipro
agree that they have knowledge management policy for sharing knowledge. The
chi-square test shows that there is no significant difference between opinions of
the respondents of Infosys and Wipro with regard to knowledge management
policy because the table value is less than calculated value at 5% level of
significance.
From among the total respondents as mentioned in Table 4.8, 52% of
Infosys & 52%of Wipro strongly agree that they have cooperation and trust to
km policy formulation through out the organization. 35% of respondents of
Infosys & 37% of Wipro agree that they have cooperation and trust to km policy
formulation through out the organization. 11% respondents of Infosys & 11%
respondents of Wipro are not in a position to decide on the above aspect. The
chi-square test shows that there is no significant difference between opinions of
the respondents of Infosys and Wipro with regard to the above said statement
because the calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of
significance.
From among the total respondents as mentioned in Table 4.9, 63% of
Infosys & 57%of Wipro strongly agree that the workers accept activities
designed to acquire and share knowledge as part of their job. 22% of respondents
of Infosys & 29% of Wipro agree that the workers accept activities designed to
acquire and share knowledge as part of their job. 15% respondents of Infosys &
14% respondents of Wipro are not in a position to decide on the above aspect.
The chi-square test shows that there is no significant difference between
opinions of the respondents of Infosys and Wipro with regard to the above said
statement because the calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of
significance.
From among the total respondents as mentioned in Table 4.10, 56% of
Infosys & 58%of Wipro strongly agree that meetings are used as a means of
92
transferring Knowledge. 40% of respondents of Infosys & 40% of Wipro agree
that meetings are used as a means of transferring Knowledge. 1% respondents
of Infosys & 1% respondents of Wipro are not in a position to decide on the
above aspect. The chi-square test shows that there is no significant difference
between opinions of the respondents of Infosys and Wipro with regard to the
above said statement because the calculated value is less than the table value at
5% level of significance.
TABLE - 4.11 Mean scores of the employee responses on Km Policy Awareness
S.No Statement Infosys Wipro
1 Organization has a Knowledge Management Policy or Strategy for acquiring and sharing Knowledge!
4.7067 4.6623
2 Organization has a Value System or Culture intended to promote Knowledge Sharing
4.6067 4.5828
3 Organization uses partnerships or strategic alliances to acquire Knowledge
4.5800 4.6291
4 Organization has policies/programs intended to improve worker retention
4.4067 4.4702
5 Organization has advisory boards and internal meeting to exchange Knowledge
4.7667 4.7020
6 Organization encourages systematic neighbor training and interdisciplinary training groups in order to get holistic overview of a given task
4.6067 4.6026
7 Knowledge sharing is prompted most effective in so far as it is incorporated in an Organization’s strategic activities
4.2933 4.3775
8 There is cooperation and trust to KM policy formulation through out your Organization
4.3600 4.4106
9 Workers immediately accept as part of their job, activities designed to acquire and share knowledge
4.4733 4.4305
10 Meetings are used as a means of transferring Knowledge in your Organization
4.4667 4.5497
Table Average : 4.5266 4.5417 Source: field survey
93
Mean Scores of the employee responses on KM Policy Awareness
94
Analysis: The study was conducted to gather opinion of employee respondents
in both the companies on the policies and awareness of KM. There are about 10
strong statements on policy awareness for which employee respondents were
requested to give their opinion on the KM practice and their awareness.
Table 4.11 gives score for every statement in each company and also
cumulative impact scores for all the 10 statements in each company. Since the
average score is 4 and above in both Wipro and Infosys, it is understood that
policy awareness with regard to KM in both companies is at a positive and
reasonable level. Each of the 10 statements discusses strong characteristics of
KM policy awareness. Hence it is considered that both organizations have
exhibited efficiency in successful formulation of KM policy and in creating high
level of awareness among their employees indicating strong KM practices.
95
TABLE - 4.12 Age wise mean scores of the employee responses on KM POLICY
Sl. No. STATEMENT
COMPANY
INFOSYS WIRPO Total Age Age Age
20-30 yrs
31-40 yrs
41-50 yrs
20-30 yrs
31-40 yrs
41-50 yrs
20-30 yrs
31-40 yrs
41-50 yrs
1 Knowledge Management Policy for acquiring and sharing Knowledge! 4.6620 4.7288 4.8000 4.6212 4.6500 4.7917 4.6423 4.6891 4.7955
2 Value System or Culture intended to promote Knowledge Sharing 4.5352 4.6441 4.7500 4.5455 4.6000 4.6250 4.5401 4.6218 4.6818
3 Uses partnerships or strategic alliances to acquire Knowledge 4.5211 4.5593 4.8500 4.5455 4.6333 4.8333 4.5328 4.5966 4.8409
4 Has policies/programs intended to improve worker retention 4.3662 4.3898 4.6000 4.4697 4.4500 4.5417 4.4161 4.4202 4.5682
5 Organization has advisory boards and internal meeting to exchange Knowledge 4.7183 4.7966 4.8500 4.6364 4.7333 4.8333 4.6788 4.7647 4.8409
6 Organization encourages systematic neighbor training and interdisciplinary training groups 4.5352 4.6610 4.7000 4.5909 4.6167 4.5833 4.5620 4.6387 4.6364
7 Knowledge sharing is prompted most effective 4.2958 4.2203 4.5000 4.3788 4.2833 4.6250 4.3358 4.2521 4.5682
8 There is cooperation and trust to KM policy formulation through 4.2958 4.3559 4.6000 4.2879 4.4500 4.6250 4.2920 4.4034 4.6136
9 Workers accept as part of their job, activities designed to acquire 4.4507 4.5254 4.4000 4.4697 4.4333 4.3333 4.4599 4.4790 4.3636
10 Meetings are used as a means of transferring Knowledge 4.4507 4.3898 4.7500 4.5000 4.5333 4.7083 4.4745 4.4622 4.7273
Source: field survey
96
TABLE - 4.13 Gender wise mean scores of the employee responses on KM POLICY
S.No STATEMENT
COMPANY INFOSYS WIRPO Total
Gender Gender Gender Male Female Male Female Male Female
1 Knowledge Management Policy for acquiring and sharing Knowledge! 4.6538 4.7639 4.6049 4.7246 4.6289 4.7447
2 Value System or Culture intended to promote Knowledge Sharing 4.5769 4.6389 4.5679 4.5942 4.5723 4.6170 3 Uses partnerships or strategic alliances to acquire Knowledge 4.5513 4.6111 4.6049 4.6522 4.5786 4.6312 4 Has policies/programs intended to improve worker retention 4.4231 4.3889 4.5062 4.4348 4.4654 4.4113
5 Organization has advisory boards and internal meeting to exchange Knowledge 4.7308 4.8056 4.6790 4.7391 4.7044 4.7730
6 Organization encourages systematic neighbor training and interdisciplinary training groups 4.5897 4.6250 4.5309 4.6812 4.5597 4.6525
7 Knowledge sharing is prompted most effective 4.2564 4.3333 4.3704 4.3913 4.3145 4.3617
8 There is cooperation and trust to KM policy formulation through 4.3205 4.4028 4.3827 4.4348 4.3522 4.4184 9 Workers accept as part of their job, activities designed to acquire 4.4872 4.4583 4.4444 4.4203 4.4654 4.4397
10 Meetings are used as a means of transferring Knowledge 4.5128 4.4167 4.5802 4.5072 4.5472 4.4610 Source: field survey
97
TABLE - 4.14 Educational qualification wise mean scores of the employee responses on KM POLICY
S.No STATEMENT
COMPANY INFOSYS WIRPO Total
Educational Qualification
Educational Qualification
Educational Qualification
U.G. P.G. Prof. D. U.G. P.G. Prof.
D. U.G. P.G. Prof.D.
1 Knowledge Management Policy for acquiring and sharing Knowledge! 4.7447 4.5882 4.7885 4.6591 4.5882 4.7273 4.7033 4.5882 4.7570
2 Value System or Culture intended to promote Knowledge Sharing 4.6383 4.6078 4.5769 4.6364 4.5686 4.5455 4.6374 4.5882 4.5607
3 Uses partnerships or strategic alliances to acquire Knowledge 4.5319 4.7255 4.4808 4.5455 4.7255 4.6000 4.5385 4.7255 4.5421
4 Has policies/programs intended to improve worker retention 4.3404 4.4510 4.4231 4.4773 4.5686 4.3818 4.4066 4.5098 4.4019
5 Organization has advisory boards and internal meeting to exchange Knowledge 4.7660 4.7647 4.7692 4.7273 4.6667 4.7273 4.7473 4.7157 4.7477
6 Organization encourages systematic neighbor training and interdisciplinary training groups 4.7021 4.6078 4.5192 4.7045 4.5294 4.5818 4.7033 4.5686 4.5514
7 Knowledge sharing is prompted most effective 4.2553 4.1961 4.4231 4.3409 4.3333 4.4545 4.2967 4.2647 4.4393
8 There is cooperation and trust to KM policy formulation through 4.4681 4.3137 4.3077 4.4318 4.4118 4.3818 4.4505 4.3627 4.3458
9 Workers accept as part of their job, activities designed to acquire 4.4681 4.3725 4.5769 4.4773 4.3333 4.4909 4.4725 4.3529 4.5327
10 Meetings are used as a means of transferring Knowledge 4.4681 4.5490 4.3846 4.5227 4.5490 4.5636 4.4945 4.5490 4.4766
Source: field survey
98
TABLE - 4.15 Designation wise mean scores of the employee responses on KM POLICY
S.No STATEMENT
COMPANY INFOSYS WIRPO Total
Designation Designation Designation SSE JSE SSE JSE SSE JSE
1 Knowledge Management Policy for acquiring and sharing Knowledge! 4.7470 4.6567 4.7045 4.5968 4.7251 4.6279
2 Value System or Culture intended to promote Knowledge Sharing 4.6867 4.5075 4.6023 4.5484 4.6433 4.5271 3 Uses partnerships or strategic alliances to acquire Knowledge 4.6506 4.4925 4.7045 4.5161 4.6784 4.5039 4 Has policies/programs intended to improve worker retention 4.4699 4.3284 4.4886 4.4516 4.4795 4.3876
5 Organization has advisory boards and internal meeting to exchange Knowledge 4.8193 4.7015 4.7614 4.6290 4.7895 4.6667
6 Organization encourages systematic neighbor training and interdisciplinary training groups 4.6867 4.5075 4.6364 4.5484 4.6608 4.5271
7 Knowledge sharing is prompted most effective 4.3253 4.2537 4.4091 4.3387 4.3684 4.2946
8 There is cooperation and trust to KM policy formulation through 4.4337 4.2687 4.5227 4.2419 4.4795 4.2558
9 Workers accept as part of their job, activities designed to acquire 4.5060 4.4328 4.4432 4.4194 4.4737 4.4264 10 Meetings are used as a means of transferring Knowledge 4.5301 4.3881 4.5795 4.5000 4.5556 4.4419
Source: field survey
99
TABLE - 4.16 Experience wise mean scores of the employee responses on KM POLICY
Sl No STATEMENT
COMPANY
INFOSYS WIRPO Total
Experience Experience Experience
1-3 yr 3-5 Yr
above 5 yr
1-3 yr
3 - 5 Yr
above 5 yr
1-3 yr
3-5 Yr
above 5 yr
1 Knowledge Management Policy for acquiring and sharing Knowledge! 4.6667 4.7018 4.8148 4.6364 4.6000 4.8750 4.6515 4.6496 4.8431
2 Value System or Culture intended to promote Knowledge Sharing 4.5606 4.5439 4.8519 4.5758 4.5833 4.5833 4.5682 4.5641 4.7255
3 Uses partnerships or strategic alliances to acquire Knowledge 4.5152 4.5965 4.7037 4.5455 4.6500 4.7917 4.5303 4.6239 4.7451
4 Has policies/programs intended to improve worker retention 4.3333 4.3684 4.6667 4.4091 4.5167 4.5417 4.3712 4.4444 4.6078
5 Organization has advisory boards and internal meeting to exchange Knowledge 4.7424 4.7719 4.8148 4.6818 4.7333 4.7083 4.7121 4.7521 4.7647
6 Organization encourages systematic neighbor training and interdisciplinary training groups 4.5303 4.6491 4.7037 4.5758 4.6000 4.6667 4.5530 4.6239 4.6863
7 Knowledge sharing is prompted most effective 4.2576 4.2807 4.4074 4.3636 4.3000 4.6250 4.3106 4.2906 4.5098
8 There is cooperation and trust to KM policy formulation through 4.2727 4.3860 4.5185 4.3030 4.4333 4.6250 4.2879 4.4103 4.5686
9 Workers accept as part of their job, activities designed to acquire 4.3788 4.5439 4.5556 4.3939 4.4667 4.4583 4.3864 4.5043 4.5098
10 Meetings are used as a means of transferring Knowledge 4.4697 4.3333 4.7407 4.5303 4.4667 4.7917 4.5000 4.4017 4.7647
Source: field survey
100
Analysis based on the Age, Gender, Education, Experience and Designation:
From the analysis of the responses based on respondent Age, gender,
education, experience and designation it can be identified that the respondents
are holding a positive opinion on the awareness of the respondents towards the
KM policy. Opinions based on the Age, it is observed that the respondents who
are between 41- 50yrs of Age are more aware of KM policy. The respondents
have exhibited more positive opinion towards the company’s use of partners and
strategic alliances to acquire Knowledge; Organization has advisory boards and
internal meeting to exchange Knowledge. (Table 4.12)
Comparatively female employees are more aware of KM policy. The
respondents have exhibited more positive opinion towards their organization
having advisory boards and internal meeting to exchange Knowledge. On the
whole both male and female have exhibited almost similar opinion of their
awareness on organizational KM policy.(Table 4.13)
The employee respondents possessing professional degree are more aware
of their KM policy in both Wipro and Infosys. The respondents have exhibited
more positive opinion towards the company’s Knowledge Management policy
for acquiring and sharing Knowledge and organization having advisory boards
and internal meeting to exchange Knowledge. (Table 4.14)
Senior software engineers are more aware of KM policy when compared
with junior engineers both in Wipro and Infosys. The respondents have exhibited
more positive opinion towards the organization having advisory boards and
internal meeting to exchange Knowledge. .(Table 4.15)
The respondents having experience more than 5 years are more aware of
KM policy. The respondents have exhibited more positive opinion towards the
company’s Knowledge Management policy for acquiring and sharing
101
Knowledge and organization has advisory boards and internal meeting to
exchange Knowledge. .(Table 4.16)
Conclusion
Major responsibility of policy formulation, creation and awareness in
respect of result oriented knowledge Management concept lies with
management, and its expertise in the field of business concerned. Highly
experienced organization and management are expected to have strong policy
and effective communication system across the organization for creating strong
and reasonable awareness among the employees.
Within the context of the study, the two respondent companies i.e. Infosys
and Wipro based on the responses have strong commitment and practice of KM
policy formulation and awareness. This phenomenon in fact is desired to have
strong practice of KM and achieving good results.
Some demographic variables might influence an employee’s preference
on sharing knowledge. According to Shermerhon (1977), employees with shorter
tenure with an organization are more likely to share information. Organ & Ryan
(1995) say gender might also influence the communication style of employees.
Organization’s size may also be related to its knowledge sharing culture like
employees in smaller organization are more likely to rely on each other and
interact often than employees in large organizations. Employees’ career level is
another factor to sharing like experienced employees may be more able to share
knowledge than younger employees (Connelly & Kelloway, 2001)2.
It is interesting to note that senior employees, female employees,
employees with professional degree, senior software engineers the most
experienced employees are more aware of KM policy. Thus the findings are
more realistic. The level of awareness on KM policy among fresher’s, male
102
employees, employees not holding professional degrees, junior software
engineers, less experienced employees need to be enhanced. This facilitates the
organization to implement KM programmes effectively3.
To motivate people to contribute to a system, some kind of rewards
should be in place. Pearson (1999) insisted that effective knowledge delivery
could be achieved by finding the right system of measurement5.
Savary (1999) said that an effective information systems infrastructure is
necessary for an organization to implement the KM process. King (1999)
pointed out, successful development of KM requires an organization to think in
terms of applications and how people use applications, not only system and
software. Popular IT tools for knowledge sharing are relational databases,
intelligent search engines, groupware, data warehouses, data mining tools etc
(Davis and Riggs, 1999)6.
103
TABLE - 4.17 Employee responses on functional area that best describes work
responsibilities
Company IT HR KM CRM FM Total
Infosys Count 112 12 17 6 3 150
% within Company 75 8 11 4 2.0 100
Wipro Count 102 17 17 11 3 150
% within Company 68 11 11 7 2 100
Total Count 214 29 34 17 6 300 Total % 71 10 11 6 2 100
Source: field survey
CHI- SQUARE VALUE
Value Df Table Value Pearson Chi-
Square 2.800(a) 4 9.488
104
TABLE - 4.18
Employee responses on ranking themselves on the level of experience and familiarity with km
Company Unaware Introductory Intermediate Advanced Total
Infosys Count 4 16 79 51 150
% within Company 3 11 53 34 100
Wipro Count 4 15 78 53 150
% within Company 3 11 53 35 100
Total Count 8 31 157 104 300
Total % 3 10 52 35 100
Source: field survey
CHI- SQUARE VALUE
Value Df Table Value
Pearson Chi-Square .077(a) 3 7.815
105
TABLE - 4.19
Employee responses on Primary emphasis of KM educational program to be relevant and useful
Source: field survey
CHI- SQUARE VALUE
Value Df Table Value Pearson Chi-Square 1.265(a) 3 7.815
Company KM strategies
KM technologies
KM Tools & Methods
Theoretical foundations
in KM Total
Infosys Count 3 76 36 35 150
% within Company 2 51 24 23 100
Wipro Count 3 68 36 43 150
% within Company 2 45 24 29 100
Total Count 6 144 72 78 300
Total % 2 48 24 26 100
106
TABLE - 4.20
Employee responses on In-charge of KM practices in the Organization
Company HR Dept. IT Dept. KM Unit Responsibility Shared Total
Infosys Count 9 6 120 15 150
% within Company 6 4 80 10 100
Wipro Count 8 6 105 31 150
% within Company 5 4 70 21 100
Total Count 17 12 225 46 300
Total % 6 4 75 15 100
Source: field survey
CHI- SQUARE VALUE
Value df Table Value
Pearson Chi-Square 6.624(a) 3 7.815
107
TABLE 4.21 Employee responses on the effectiveness of KM practices in the
Organization
Company Through
guidance and Instructions
Through Activities
Included In Company
Employee satisfaction
Surveys
Customer satisfaction Surveys
Total
Infosys Count 36 25 64 25 150
% within Company 24 17 43 17 100
Wipro Count 30 25 65 30 150
% within Company 20 17 43 20 100
Total Count 66 50 129 55 300
Total % 22 17 43 18 100
Source: field survey
CHI- SQUARE VALUE
Value Df Table Value
Pearson Chi-Square 1.008(a) 3 7.815
108
TABLE 4.22 Employee responses on the sources effecting current km practices
Company Manage- ment
Non –Mgmt workers
Owners & Sh.Holders Board Total
Infosys Count 127 19 2 2 150
% within Company 85 13 1 1 100
Wipro Count 116 18 8 8 150
% within Company 77 12 5 5 100
Total Count 243 37 10 10 300
Total % 81 12 3 3 100
Source: field survey CHI- SQUARE VALUE
Value Df Table Value Pearson Chi-Square 3.881 3 7.815
109
TABLE 4.23
Employee responses on Motivation of the Organization to increase KM practices
Company I.C I.C.I A.L. OF. K.P L.OF.M.S Total
Infosys Count 123 13 9 5 150
% within Company 82 9 6 3 100
Wipro Count 109 18 14 9 150
% within Company 73 12 9 6 100
Total Count 232 31 23 14 300
Total % 77 10 8 5 100
Source: field survey
CHI- SQUARE VALUE
Value Df Table Value
Pearson Chi-Square 3.881(a) 3 7.815
110
TABLE 4.24 Employee responses on Indication of the achieved results of KM
practices IN THE Organization
Company I. of S. & K. of s. I.I.K.S.H I.A. of
p/S H. & N.
P/S Total
Infosys Count 98 26 20 6 150
% within Company 65 17 13 4 100
Wipro Count 88 27 24 11 150
% within Company 59 18 16 7 100
Total Count 186 53 44 17 300 Total % 62 18 15 6 100
Source: field survey
CHI- SQUARE VALUE
Value Df Table Value Pearson Chi-Square 2.391(a) 3 7.815
111
TABLE 4.25 Employee responses on usage of KM activities in the Organization
Company I .C. A T.W.S. of the Org. I.A.P I.KM.Sh.S Total
Infosys Count 82 33 32 3 150
% within Company 55 22 21 2 100
Wipro Count 78 34 31 7 150
% within Company 52 23 21 5 100
Total Count 162 67 63 10 300
Total % 53 22 21 3 100
Source: field survey
CHI- SQUARE VALUE
Value df Table Value
Pearson Chi-Square 1.731(a) 1 3.841
112
TABLE 4.26
Employee responses on KM practice procedure is most used in the Organization
Company GWP IPG IWSCSM I/PI Total
Infosys Count 14 16 93 27 150
% within Company 9 11 62 18 100
Wipro Count 14 15 91 30 150
% within Company 9 10 61 20 100
Total Count 28 31 184 57 300
Total % 9 10 61 19 100
Source: field survey
CHI- SQUARE VALUE
Value df Table Value
Pearson Chi-Square .212(a) 3 7.815
113
Analysis of the tables from 4.17-4.26
From among the total respondents as mentioned in 4.17, 75% of Infosys
& 68%of Wipro opted IT as the functional area that best describes work
responsibilities. 8% of Infosys & 11% of Wipro opted HR, 11% of Infosys &
11% of Wipro opted KM, 4% of Infosys & 7% of Wipro opted CRM, 2% of
Infosys & 2% of Wipro respondents opted FM as the functional area that best
describes work responsibilities respectively. The chi-square test shows that there
is no significant difference between opinions of the respondents of Infosys and
Wipro with regard to the above said statement because the calculated value is
less than the table value at 5% level of significance.
From among the total respondents as mentioned in 4.18, 34% of Infosys
& 35%of Wipro ranked themselves ‘advanced’, 53% of Infosys & 53% of Wipro
ranked themselves ‘intermediate’, 11% of Infosys & 11% of Wipro ranked
themselves ‘introductory’, 3% of Infosys & 3% of Wipro respondents ranked
themselves ‘unaware’ respectively on the level of experience and familiarity
with KM. The chi-square test shows that there is no significant difference
between opinions of the respondents of Infosys and Wipro with regard to the
above said statement because the calculated value is less than the table value at
5% level of significance.
From among the total respondents as mentioned in 4.19, 23% of Infosys
& 29%of Wipro opted theoretical foundations in KM, 24% of Infosys & 24% of
Wipro opted KM tools & methods, 51% of Infosys & 45% of Wipro opted KM
technologies, 2% of Infosys & 2% of Wipro respondents opted KM strategies
respectively for the primary emphasis of KM educational program that is
relevant and useful. The chi-square test shows that there is no significant
difference between opinions of the respondents of Infosys and Wipro with
regard to the above said statement because the calculated value is less than the
table value at 5% level of significance.
114
From among the total respondents as mentioned in 4.20, 10% of Infosys
& 21%of Wipro opted ‘responsibility shared’ , 80% of Infosys & 70% of Wipro
opted ‘KM unit’, 4% of Infosys & 4% of Wipro opted ‘IT department’, 6% of
Infosys & 5% of Wipro respondents opted ‘HR department’ respectively as the
in charge of KM practices in the organization. The chi-square test shows that
there is no significant difference between opinions of the respondents of Infosys
and Wipro with regard to the above said statement because the calculated value
is less than the table value at 5% level of significance.
From among the total respondents as mentioned in 4.21, 24% of Infosys
& 20%of Wipro opted ‘Through guidance and Instructions’, 17% of Infosys &
17% of Wipro opted ‘Through Activities Included In Company’, 43% of Infosys
& 43% of Wipro opted ‘Employee satisfaction Surveys’, 17% of Infosys & 20%
of Wipro respondents opted ‘Customer satisfaction Surveys’ respectively as the
method responsible for effectiveness of KM practices in their organization. The
chi-square test shows that there is no significant difference between opinions of
the respondents of Infosys and Wipro with regard to the above said statement
because the calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of
significance.
From among the total respondents as mentioned in 4.22, 85% of Infosys
& 77%of Wipro opted ‘management’, 13% of Infosys & 12% of Wipro opted
‘non-management workers’, 1% of Infosys & 5% of Wipro opted ‘owners &
share holders’, 1% of Infosys & 5% of Wipro respondents opted ‘Board
members’ respectively as the sources effecting current KM practices in their
organization. The chi-square test shows that there is no significant difference
between opinions of the respondents of Infosys and Wipro with regard to the
above said statement because the calculated value is less than the table value at
5% level of significance.
115
From among the total respondents as mentioned in 4.23, 82% of Infosys
& 73% of Wipro opted ‘Improved Competitiveness’, 9% of Infosys & 12% of
Wipro opted ‘Improved corporate Image’,6% of Infosys & 9% of Wipro opted ‘
Avoiding loss of key Personnel’ 3% of Infosys & 6% of Wipro opted ‘Loss of
Market share’ respectively as the reason for motivation in the organization to
increase KM practices. The chi-square test shows that there is no significant
difference between opinions of the respondents of Infosys and Wipro with
regard to the above said statement because the calculated value is less than the
table value at 5% level of significance.
From among the total respondents as mentioned in 4.24, 65% of Infosys
& 59%of Wipro opted “Improvement of Skills and Knowledge of
Workers”,17% of Infosys & 18% of Wipro opted “Increased improved
Knowledge sharing Horizontally”, 13%nfosys of & 16% of Wipro opted
“Increased adoption of Products /Services”, 4% of Infosys & 7% of Wipro opted
“Helped to add new products /Services” respectively as the indication of the
achieved results of KM practices in the organization. The chi-square test shows
that there is no significant difference between opinions of the respondents of
Infosys and Wipro with regard to the above said statement because the
calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of significance.
From among the total respondents as mentioned in 4.25, 55% of Infosys
&52 %of Wipro opted “to improve the competitive advantage”, 22% of Infosys
& 23% of Wipro opted “to meet the strategic objectives of the organization”,
21% of Infosys & 21% of Wipro opted “improving the ability to take out
patents” 2% of Infosys & 5% of Wipro opted “improving KM sharing suppliers”
respectively as the response on usage of KM activities in the organization. The
chi-square test shows that there is no significant difference between opinions of
the respondents of Infosys and Wipro with regard to the above said statement
because the calculated value is less than the table value at 5% level of
significance.
116
From among the total respondents as mentioned in 4.26, 9%of Infosys&
9%of Wipro respondents opted “Guide for working procedures and ethics”, 11%
of Infosys & 10% of Wipro opted “Interdisciplinary project groups”, 62% of
Infosys & 61% of Wipro opted “Internal work shops in connection with staff
meetings”, 18% of Infosys & 20% of Wipro opted “Internet/purchased
information” respectively as the KM practice procedure that is most used in their
Organization. The chi-square test shows that there is no significant difference
between opinions of the respondents of Infosys and Wipro with regard to the
above said statement because the calculated value is less than the table value at
5% level of significance.
Employees’ understanding of KM policy and its value in the organization
is crucial for successful KM implementation. The more a person knows about
KM policy and its benefits for the company, the more he or she might be willing
to participate in knowledge management programs in the Knowledge
organizations. Vallas (1998) says that “employees will not share knowledge
among all group members if the groups are constrained by hierarchies or
perceived imbalances – people are inhibited by their superiors4.
TESTING OF HYPOTHESIS:
The current study moves with the following mentioned hypothesis.
H0: Awareness of the KM policies will not enhance the effectiveness of KM practices.
H1: Awareness of the KM policies will enhance the effectiveness of KM
practices.
The analysis reveals that the respondents from both sample organizations
i.e. Infosys and Wipro have a positive opinion over their companies’ KM
policies. It is also disclosed that the employees of these organizations are very
well aware of their policy system, which results in the effective performance of
117
their respective organizations. The opinions of the respondents of Infosys and
Wipro over the above said statement are likely to be similar and proved to be
correct. Further it can be substantiated by the insignificant chi-square values.
That means there is no much significant difference between the opinions of the
respondents of these two selected organizations.
Familiarity with Knowledge Management policies has a great impact on
Knowledge Management practices. As H1 hypothesis has been accepted which
clearly implies that “Awareness of the KM policies will enhance the
effectiveness of KM practices”, thus it can be concluded that H1 holds good in
both the companies.
The above test helps to conclude that KM policy awareness enhances the
effectiveness of KM programs. Hence the results of the study are in tune with
the conceptual aspects of KM policy awareness. Measuring accurate
effectiveness of KM programme is possible when further analysis and evaluation
is done on KM implementation.
References: 1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_policy
2. Connelly, E.C., and Kelloway, K.E. (2001), Predictors of Employee’s
perception of knowledge sharing culture, working paper, Queen’s Center for
Knowledge-Based Enterprise, Queens School of Business, Canada.
3. www.kmtalk.net
4. Vallas, S. (1998), Manufacturing Knowledge: Technology, culture and social
inequality at work, Social Science Computer Review, 16(4): 353-369.
5. Pearson, T. 1999. Measurements and the Knowledge Revolution. Quality
Progress. 32(9):154-165.
6. Savary, M. 1999. “Knowledge Management and Competition in the
Consulting Industry”, California Management Review, 41(2).