Police & Crime CommissionerPerformance Monitoring Group

2013/14 Quarter 4

20th May 2014

OPEN AGENDA

Contents

Part One: OPEN

1 Priorities & Targets / HMIC Programme of Work2 Crime & Antisocial Behaviour3 Neighbourhood Policing4 Hate Crime5 Organisational Priorities6 Public Safety (OPEN)

Part Two: CLOSED

6 Public Safety (CLOSED)7 Serious & Organised Crime

1.1 Strategic Priorities & Targets 2013/14Priority Outcomes

1. Reduce Crime and Anti Social Behaviour (ASB)Reduce All Crime, Violence, Burglary Dwelling, Robbery & ASB. Increase the Crime Outcome rate (Burglary Dwelling & Robbery).

2. Provide a visible and accessible Neighbourhood Policing StyleMaintain Victim Satisfaction.

3. Tackle Serious and Organised Crime Reduce Firearms Discharges.

4. Maintain Public SafetyIncrease Crime Outcomes for Domestic Abuse & Rape. Reduce fatal KSIs, Maintain Detainee Management.

5. Take Effective Action against all forms of Hate CrimeIncrease Crime Outcomes and monitor the various stands.

1.2 2013/14 Crime & Outcome Targets

Crime• All Crime• ASB• Burglary Dwelling• Robbery• Violence (-2%)

Sanction Detections• Increase Burglary Dwelling SD rate (17%)• Increase Robbery SD rate (25%)• Hate Crime• Domestic Abuse• Rape

BCUs (Crime)• Knowsley – UTMV (-11.2%) and TFMV (-2.2%)• Liv North – Other Stealing (-7.5%)• Liv South – TFMV (-4.4%)

Force

Increase Crime Outcome Rates (based on 2012/13 YE)

Reduce

Firearms Discharges• Firearms Discharges (-15%)

1.3 HMIC Inspection Programme

•Crime Data Integrity•Child Protection•Undercover Policing•Police Leadership and Integrity•SPR•All Force Inspection (PEEL Assessments)•The VtP4 inspections will inform the all force inspections•HMIC 2014/15 Inspection Programme

1.4 Organisational PrioritiesData Quality – Compliance with NCRS

Quarter 4

Force All Incidents closed correctly in line

with NSIR/NCRS?

Incidents recorded within

72 hours?

Incidents with correct crime

classifications?

Incidents closed with

correct closing code?

Burglary 120 96% 97% 94% 94%

Criminal Damage 120 100% 97% 99% 99%

Robbery 118 97% 95% 77% 90%

Violence 120 95% 100% 94% 98%

Theft of/from motor vehicle

120 98% 100% 95% 96%

Domestic Violence 120 95% 94% 97% 93%

Hate Crimes 120 96% 84% 91% 81%

Making off without payment

116 95% 89% 89% 76%

Compliance %

Force Crime and Incident Review

Crime Audit Team,

Strategic Development Department

Au

dit

Sam

ple

Crime & ASB

2.1 Crime & ASBCrime Tree (compared to target / comparator)

2.2 Crime & ASBCrime Tree (compared to previous year)

YTD % of all crime

Target/Comparator Change from Target

2.3 Crime & ASBOverall Crime

Short Term

Apr 13 - Mar 14 93131vs Target 3.6% vs Previous Year 3.5% 12 Month Trend Increasing

2.4 Crime & ASBOverall Crime

Short Term

Target Act Diff % Diff

A 14260 16277 2017 14.1%B 14938 14881 -57 -0.4%C 8841 8832 -9 -0.1%D 9789 10483 694 7.1%E 30062 30568 506 1.7%F 11958 12091 133 1.1%

Force 89853 93132 3279 3.6%

All Crime

2.5 Crime & ASBDomestic Burglary

Short Term

Apr 13 - Mar 14 6402vs Target -1.5% vs Previous Year -1.6% 12 Month Trend Seasonal

2.6 Crime & ASBDomestic Burglary

Short Term

Target Act Diff % DiffA 859 901 42 4.9%B 1369 1168 -201 -14.7%C 545 472 -73 -13.4%D 618 606 -12 -1.9%E 1984 2163 179 9.0%F 1120 1092 -28 -2.5%

Force 6500 6402 -98 -1.5%

Burglary - Domestic

2.7 Crime & ASBRobbery

Short Term

Apr 13 - Mar 14 1202vs Target 2.7% vs Previous Year 2.3% 12 Month Trend Seasonal

2.8 Crime & ASBRobbery

Short Term

Target Act Diff % DiffA 110 101 -9 -8.2%B 162 153 -9 -5.6%C 84 84 0 0.0%D 66 69 3 4.5%E 580 591 11 1.9%F 163 204 41 25.2%

Force 1170 1202 32 2.7%

Robbery

2.9 Crime & ASBViolence

Short Term

Apr 13 - Mar 14 12861vs Target 19.8% vs Previous Year 16.3% 12 Month Trend Increasing

2.10 Crime & ASBViolence

Short Term

Target Act Diff % DiffA 2226 2694 468 21.0%B 1810 1790 -20 -1.1%C 863 1099 236 27.3%D 1102 1433 331 30.0%E 3512 4338 826 23.5%F 1219 1507 288 23.6%

Force 10737 12861 2124 19.8%

Violence

2.11 Crime & ASBASB incidents

Short Term

Apr 13 - Mar 14 58293vs Target -4.0% vs Previous Year -3.9% 12 Month Trend Seasonal

2.12 Crime & ASBASB incidents

Short Term

Target Act Diff DiffA 12929 12663 -266 -2.1%B 9659 9049 -610 -6.3%C 6323 6309 -14 -0.2%D 6480 6028 -452 -7.0%E 18349 17596 -753 -4.1%F 6946 6642 -304 -4.4%

Force 60690 58287 -2403 -4.0%

ASB

2.13 Crime & ASBDomestic Burglary Crime Outcome Rate

Short Term

Apr 13 - Mar 14 17.3% vs Target 0.3 pp vs Previous Year 6.8 pp 12 Month Trend Stable

Burglary Dwelling

Vol. %Charges / Summons 781 70.9%Cautions / Warnings 21 1.9%

FPN 0 0.0%TIC 292 26.5%

Cannabis Warnings 0 0.0%Community Resolutions 8 0.7%Total Crime Outcomes 1,102 100.0%

Police Discretion 0

Apr - Mar 14

2.14 Crime & ASBDomestic Burglary Crime Outcome Rate

Short Term

Sanc Det Com Res Cr Out % % Pt Diff PDRA 161 1 17.98% -1.62% 0B 204 6 17.98% 0.98% 0C 93 0 19.70% 0.10% 0D 119 0 19.64% 0.04% 0E 393 1 18.17% 3.17% 0F 128 0 11.72% -5.28% 0

Force 1097 8 17.26% 0.26% 0

Domestic Burglary - Crime Outcomes (Target)

2.15 Crime & ASBRobbery Crime Outcome Rate

Short Term

Apr 13 - Mar 14 22.5% vs Target -2.5 pp vs Previous Year 0.8 pp 12 Month Trend Decreasing

Robbery

Vol. %Charges / Summons 263 97.4%Cautions / Warnings 2 0.7%

FPN 0 0.0%TIC 2 0.7%

Cannabis Warnings 0 0.0%Community Resolutions 3 1.1%Total Crime Outcomes 270

Police Discretion 0

Apr - Mar 14

2.16 Crime & ASBRobbery Crime Outcome Rate

Short Term

Sanc Det Com Res Cr Out % % Pt Diff PDRA 33 0 32.67% 7.37% 0B 43 0 28.10% 2.80% 0C 24 0 28.57% 1.07% 0D 25 0 36.23% 6.13% 0E 102 3 17.77% -6.53% 0F 40 0 19.61% -7.29% 0

Force 267 3 22.46% -2.54% 0

Robbery - Crime Outcomes (Target)

2.17 Crime & ASBOverall Crime Outcome Rate

Short Term

Apr 13 - Mar 14 32.3%vs Target -0.9 ppvs Previous Year -1.0 pp12 Month Trend Stable

All Crime

Vol. %Charges / Summons 17,594 58.5%Cautions / Warnings 3,437 11.4%

FPN 3,150 10.5%TIC 587 2.0%

Cannabis Warnings 2,438 8.1%Community Resolutions 2,857 9.5%Total Crime Outcomes 30,063 100.0%

Police Discretion 1,819

Apr - Mar 14

2.18 Crime & ASBOverall Crime Outcome Rate

Short Term

Sanc Det Com Res Cr Out % % Pt Diff PDRA 4967 598 34.19% -4.26% 325B 4662 439 34.28% 0.59% 383C 2846 353 36.22% 1.84% 98D 3100 356 32.97% -0.38% 252E 7828 548 27.40% -2.17% 576F 3800 564 36.09% 1.73% 187

Force 27203 2858 32.28% -0.90% 1821

All - Crime Outcomes (Target)

Repeat ASB Callers: Jan-Mar 2014

2.19 Crime & ASBRepeat Victimisation

Original Address Incs.

A Home Address 11

B Home Address 10

C Fast Food Outlet 14

C Pizza and Kebab Shop 8

D Fast Food Outlet 16

E Fast Food Outlet 19

E Shop 19

F Fast Food Outlet 14

2.20 Crime & ASBStop and Search: Trends

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Apr-13 May-13 Jun-13 Jul-13 Aug-13 Sep-13 Oct-13 Nov-13 Dec-13 Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14

Stop & Search

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

2003/2004 2004/2005 2005/2006 2006/2007 2007/2008 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014

Stop & Search

2.21 Crime & ASBStop and Search: Ethnic Disproportionality

2.22 Crime & ASBDetainee Management – Case Progression

Medium Term

• TQ1s – First Appearance File Quality (Target 85%) – Performance has been fairly stable this year across all BCUs with every BCU meeting target. Current force performance at 87.2%.

• TQ2 – Full File Quality (Target 85%) – Performance has remained stable in this financial year with the exception of January. Current performance at 91.31%.

2.23 Crime & ASBDetainee Management – Warrants

Medium Term

Category A Warrants – Target 70% to be executed within 14 days.• Performance for March 13 – 77% • Performance YTD (March 2013) – 73%

Category B Warrants – Target 75% to be executed within 21 days.• Performance has remained stable over the past 12 months. • Performance for March 13 – 85%• Performance YTD (March 2013) – 85%

2.24 Crime & ASBDetainee Management – Licence Recalls

Medium Term

Emergency Recalls – Target 75% to be arrested within 48 hrs of revoke. • YTD Current performance (March 2014) – A total of 18 Emergency

Recalls issued, 13 of which (72%) have met target.

Standard Recalls – Target 75% to be arrested within 96 hrs of revoke. • Current performance – A total of 203 Standard Recalls issued, 144 of

which (71%) have met target.

2.25 Crime & ASBDetainee Management – Bail Management

Medium Term

Merseyside Police currently has 2,865 distinct individuals out on bail.

Primary Arrest Disposals • Target is <25% to be bailed on primary arrest. • Performance YTD at 26.1%. Return Disposals • Target is >65% not to be re-bailed on any non-primary arrest. • Performance YTD at 75.3%.

2.26 Crime & ASBFirst Time Entrants to the Criminal Justice System (CJS)

Medium Term

2.27 Crime & ASBDrug & Alcohol Abuse

Long Term

•Probation developing Merseyside IOM Strategy through MCJB. CI Thornton working on this full time for police to deliver consistent approach.

•Need to achieve more focus on alcohol. Driver for violence which is an area of threat. Pivotal to managing violence repeat offenders.

•Improved service provision through joint commissioning?

•Pilot ongoing to drugs test violence offenders. Currently showing over 30% positive for cocaine.

NeighbourhoodPolicing

3.1 Neighbourhood PolicingOverall Victim Satisfaction with Service

Short Term

Apr 13 - Feb 14 87.3%vs Target -1.5 ppvs Previous Year -1.4 pp12 Month Trend Decreasing

3.2 Neighbourhood PolicingBRM Victim Satisfaction Gap

Short Term

Apr 13 - Feb 14 6.3 ppvs Target -3.2 ppvs Previous Year -12.9 pp12 Month Trend Decreasing

3.3 Neighbourhood PolicingGrade 1 Incident Attendance

Short Term

Apr 13 - Mar 14 95.3% vs Target 5.3 pp vs Previous Year -1.3 pp 12 Month Trend Stable

3.4 Neighbourhood PolicingCommunity Intelligence

Early this year analysis identified a 31% increase in calls to Crimestoppers compared to the same period the previous year. Over 90 individuals were arrested/charged or cautioned (12% increase on same period last year).

There has been continued drive in terms of distribution of Crimestoppers literature at all Community Meetings.

A mass letter drop, distributing 2000 letters to residential properties within the Stockbridge Village area asking for any information residents may have to help reduce crime and disorder within their area

Polish Leaflets. Following a serious assault in the Southport area were a Polish male was attacked. PCC made enquiries as to if we held Crimestoppers leaflets in Polish. Artwork was obtained and sent to the Print Room HQ, leaflets printed and distributed within a 48 hour period.

3.5 Neighbourhood PolicingPublic Confidence

Long Term

1 Northumbria 66.6% 5.0% 61.7% 71.6%2 Greater Manchester 63.4% 2.8% 60.6% 66.2%3 Merseyside 62.9% 4.1% 58.8% 67.0%4 Cleveland 62.0% 3.6% 58.3% 65.6%5 West Yorkshire 61.0% 3.2% 57.8% 64.3%6 West Midlands 58.8% 3.1% 55.7% 62.0%7 South Yorkshire 57.2% 4.1% 53.1% 61.2%

MSG Average 61.7% 1.4% 60.3% 63.1%

iQuanta Bar Chart MSGMerseyside

Year ending 30 Sep 2013Police do a good or excellent job

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Nor

thum

bria

Gre

ater

Man

ches

ter

Mer

seys

ide

Cle

vela

nd

Wes

tYo

rksh

ire

Wes

tM

idla

nds

Sout

hYo

rksh

ire

MSG Average MSG Average Confidence Interval

Oct - Sep 13 60.6% vs Previous Year -2.3 pp12 Month Trend Stable

1234567

MSG Average

Range Low

Range High

Rank Force %Conf

Interval

iQuanta Bar Chart MSGMerseyside

Police do a good or excellent jobYear ending 31 Dec 2013

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Nor

thum

bria

Gre

ater

Man

ches

ter

Wes

tY

orks

hire

Mer

seys

ide

Cle

vela

nd

Wes

tM

idla

nds

Sou

thY

orks

hire

Data is strictly for internal management information only.

MSG Average MSG Average Confidence Interval

Hate Crime

4.1 Hate CrimeHate Crime

Short Term

Apr 13 - Mar 14 1700vs Target 22.5% vs Previous Year 21.7% 12 Month Trend Increasing

4.2 Hate CrimeHate Crime Repeat Victimisation

Short Term

• Repeat victims engaged by Hate Crime Co-ordinator or Neighbourhood Team to provide support, make an assessment and provide target hardening advice if appropriate.

• Referral to the regular Hate Crime partnership groups to provide support and target hardening measures such as CCTV and fire risk assessment.

• Risk status (High/medium/low) determined by Knowsley and Liverpool North. Only those assessed as High/medium risk referred to MARAC.

• St Helens – N’hood supervision and staff made aware of HC victims weekly. All victims receive additional reassurance visits and HVP is increased in the area.

• Appropriate support services available explained to the victim and contact facilitated.

Repeats All Victims Repeat RateHate Crime 27 146 19.2%

4.3 Hate CrimeHate Crime Outcome Rate

Medium Term

Once identified as a Hate Crime, the investigation is passed to the appropriate SIGMA team within each BCU. SIGMA teams then progress the investigation, provide support, make an assessment of the individual victim’s circumstances and provide target hardening advice if

appropriate.

Apr 13 - Mar 14 40.2% vs Target -1.4 pp vs Previous Year -1.4 pp 12 Month Trend Stable

4.4 Hate CrimeThird Party Hate Crime Reporting

Medium Term

• 3rd Party Reporting – CAB approached

• New forms in use across the Force

• Muslim Womens’ Coffee Mornings

4.5 Hate CrimeCommunity Awareness and Education

Long Term

• Hate crime training at schools, universities & hospitals• Support networks promoting hate crime reporting• Hate Crime presentations to youth groups• E-card re-launch• Engagement Toolkit produced• Crime Prevention Advice for Chinese burglary victims• MIAG Involvement• Polish language reassurance leaflets

OrganisationalPriorities

5.1 Organisational PrioritiesHR- Establishment (year end)

Police Officer year end establishment includes 221 student officers and 34 transferee officers recruited during 2013-2014

PCS&TO year end establishment includes 56 PCS&TO recruited during 2013-2014.

5.2 Organisational PrioritiesHR- Measures to achieve 2014/15 Establishment

• Police Officer Recruitment 2014-2015 Minimal recruitment scheduled to maintain 3,886 police officer posts.

• Special Constables recruitment 2014-2015Scheduled to recruit a further 220 Special Constables.

• PCS&TOs recruitment 2014-2015 As a result of the Police Officer recruitment process and to address current vacancies, a further 40 PCS&TO are scheduled to be recruited.

5.3 Organisational PrioritiesHR – Police Officer Sickness

Apr-Mar 14 3.50% nvs Target 0.0 pp nvs Apr-Mar 12 -1.4 PP n

12 Month Trend Seasonal nPolice Officer 12 Month Totals for Sickness Absence Hours Rate Against Target of 3.5%

2013/Apr 2013/May 2013/Jun 2013/Jul 2013/Aug 2013/Sep 2013/Oct 2013/Nov 2013/Dec 2014/Jan 2014/Feb 2014/Mar YTD

Female 5.3% 4.0% 4.0% 4.2% 3.4% 3.5% 3.8% 4.6% 4.7% 4.7% 4.4% 4.3% 4.2%

Male 3.5% 3.3% 3.2% 3.4% 2.8% 2.9% 3.1% 3.1% 3.5% 3.4% 3.2% 3.3% 3.2%

All Genders 3.9% 3.5% 3.4% 3.6% 2.9% 3.1% 3.3% 3.5% 3.8% 3.7% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5%Annual Target 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5%3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.4% 3.4% 3.4% 3.5% 3.8% 3.9% 3.7% 3.5% 3.4% 3.5%

FORCE TOTAL FOR POLICE OFFICERS

HO Absence Hours Rate

Seasonalized Target Guide

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

4.0%

4.5%

5.0%

5.5%

2013/Apr 2013/M ay 2013/Jun 2013/Jul 2013/Aug 2013/Sep 2013/Oct 2013/Nov 2013/Dec 2014/Jan 2014/Feb 2014/M ar

Female

Male

All Genders

Annual Target

Seasonalized TargetGuide

5.4 Organisational PrioritiesHR- Police Staff Sickness

Apr-Mar 14 3.70% nvs Target -0.3 pp nvs Apr-Mar 12 -0.5 PP n

12 Month Trend Seasonal nPolice Staff 12 Month Totals for Sickness Absence Hours Rate Against Target of 4%

HO Absence Hours Rate 2013/Apr 2013/May 2013/Jun 2013/Jul 2013/Aug 2013/Sep 2013/Oct 2013/Nov 2013/Dec 2014/Jan 2014/Feb 2014/Mar YTD

Female 4.2% 4.0% 4.3% 3.9% 3.4% 3.9% 4.7% 5.2% 5.2% 4.2% 4.3% 4.3% 4.3%

Male 3.3% 3.0% 3.3% 2.7% 2.3% 3.7% 2.7% 1.7% 1.9% 3.5% 3.5% 2.9% 2.9%

All Genders 3.8% 3.6% 3.9% 3.4% 2.9% 3.8% 3.9% 3.8% 3.9% 3.9% 4.0% 3.7% 3.7%Annual Target 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0%

3.7% 3.6% 3.6% 4.0% 3.8% 3.8% 4.1% 4.4% 4.5% 4.4% 4.2% 3.9% 4.0%

3.7% 3.6% 3.6% 4.0% 3.8% 3.8% 4.1% 4.4% 4.5% 4.4% 4.2% 3.9%

FORCE TOTAL FOR POLICE

STAFF

Seasonalized Target Guide

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

4.0%

4.5%

5.0%

5.5%

2013/Apr 2013/M ay 2013/Jun 2013/Jul 2013/Aug 2013/Sep 2013/Oct 2013/Nov 2013/Dec 2014/Jan 2014/Feb 2014/M ar

Female

Male

All Genders

Annual Target

Seasonalized TargetGuide

5.5 Organisational PrioritiesEquality & Diversity: Police Officer Establishment

Group Number PercentAll Individuals 4040 100%Male 2939 73%Female 1101 27%White 3875 96%BRM 135 3%Disabled 13 0%LGB 79 2%Religious Affiliation 2116 52%

5.6 Organisational PrioritiesEquality & Diversity: Police Staff Establishment

Group Number PercentAll Individuals 2319 100%Male 887 38%Female 1432 62%White 2276 98%BRM 34 1%Disabled 48 2%LGB 30 1%Religious Affiliation 1080 47%

5.7 Organisational PrioritiesFinance- Revenue Budget Monitoring

Original Estimate 31st March 2014

Provisional Outturn 31st March 2014

Forecast Under-spend 2013/14 Variance (%)

£322.4 £316.5 £5.9m 1.8%

• Provisional Outturn for the year of £5.9m mainly due to vacancies arising from structural change.

• Chief Officers have agreed to utilise these vacancy savings to support Ambition 4000 throughout the current CSR.

• Under-spend position includes re-organisation costs of £3.5m.

5.8 Organisational PrioritiesFinance- Capital Budget

Revised Budget 2013/14*

Provisional Outturn 31st March 2014

Underspend

IT/Technical £5.1m £3.3m £1.8m

Estates £12.6m £4.2m £8.4m

Fleet £3.9m £2.8m £1.1m

Total £21.6m £10.3m £11.3m

* includes re-phased projects from 2012/13

• The original capital budget of £19.040m contained within the 2013/14 budget report has now been updated to include the re-phasing agreed as part of the 2012/13 closedown process with a resulting budget of £21.6m

• The provisional figure for total capital expenditure to the end of March 2014 is £10.3m.

• The largest area of underspend relates to the Estate Strategy which has seen some significant change since the original budget was agreed.

5.9 Organisational Priorities Finance - Savings Targets

• Savings targets within the 2013/14 MTFS are expected to be exceeded by £5.1m as a result of initiatives originally scheduled for 2014/15 being implemented ahead of plan.

• Overall targeted savings to the end of 2014/15 anticipated as being achievable in full.

• The savings targets for 2015/16 and 2016/17 have now been revised to reflect the October CSR with a shortfalls of £15.7m and £17.79m respectively.

5.10 Organisational PrioritiesFinance-– MTFS 2014/15 Budget Report

2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL

Budget Shortfall £12.7m £17.3m £16.9m £6.8m £53.7m

Savings Identified (£12.7m) - - - (£12.7m)

Savings to be Identified £0.0m £17.3m £16.9m £6.8m £41.0m

• Funding for 2014/15 has now been confirmed and the shortfall in budget has been addressed through the SEP savings programme and use of the PCSO reserve.

• On 26th June 2013 the Government announced plans to make further budget cuts in 2015/16 and 2016/17and indications are that Merseyside Police will be required to save a further £34.2m in 2015/16 and 2016/17.

5.11 Organisational Priorities Facilities ManagementCurrent Activity Action Current Position

Implementation of FMD elements of the SEP Review

Implementation of new and revised services into functions of the department. Phase 1 - Reduction on posts and new ways of working. Phase 2 - Reducing spend on buildings by reducing occupation.

Phase 1 - The SEP4 90 day review has been carried out. The savings have been achieved and departmental performance is being monitored to ensure agreed levels of service are achieved. Phase 2 - EFM achieved the savings identified for 2013/2014 and a programme of works is in place to deliver the 2014/2015 savings.

Estate Strategy Progress the Estate Strategy as approved at the March COG Away Day, to include the Corporate Strategy and the BCU Strategy.

PCC and Chief Officers gave approval to progress elements of the BCU Strategy and Cororate Strategy. Work to establish the required resources and corporate governance that will set the foundations of each project is on going. Public consultation is expected to commence later this year by the PCC.

Existing portolio work Maintenance/response service for FM issues in the existing estate. The new Framework commenced 1st April 2014 for Reactive repairs service and Minor works and Projects. The 2014/15 programme of works delivered by the EFM has been appoved at the February COG/SMT meeting.

5.12 Organisational PrioritiesComplaint Cases - Trend

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

2010/112011/122012/132013/14

5.13 Organisational PrioritiesComplaint Cases – Year to Date

2012/13 2013/14 Dif. % Dif.Wirral 111 96 -15 -13.5%Sefton 85 80 -5 -5.9%Knowsley 54 62 8 14.8%St Helens 50 47 -3 -6.0%Liverpool North 130 153 23 17.7%Liverpool South 72 75 3 4.2%MSOC (Matrix and OSU) 83 86 3 3.6%Custody & CJU 21 32 11 52.4%FCC 14 15 1 7.1%Other 44 39 -5 -11.4%Force 664 685 21 3.2%

Public Safety(Open)

6.1 Public SafetyRepeat Victimisation of Vulnerable Victims: March 2014

Short Term

Repeats All Victims Repeat RateHate Crime 27 146 19.2%Domestic Abuse 83 423 20.1%Sexual Offences 7 127 5.5%

6.2 Public SafetyRape Crime Outcome Rate

Short Term

Apr 13 - Mar 14 27.8% vs Target 11.5 pp vs Previous Year 8.6 pp 12 Month Trend Increasing

6.3 Public SafetyRTC: KSIs KSIs 2013-2014

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2013 KSIs 2014 KSIs 2014 Target

2013 KSIs 25 41 35 57 43 58 57 47 62 50 55 43

2014 KSIs 50 52 35

2014 Target 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Jan - Mar 14 137vs Target -4.2% vs Previous Year 35.6% 12 Month Trend Stable

6.4 Public SafetyMissing / Absent Persons

Medium Term

Missing from Home/Unauthorised Absence

The Sefton ‘Missing’ Pilot has been running since September. It incorporates the new ACPO approved two-tiered definition of Missing:

Missing - “Anyone whose whereabouts cannot be established and where the circumstances are out of character or the context suggests the person may be subject of crime or at risk of harm to themselves or another.”

Absent – “A person not at a place where they are expected or required to be.”

This new, two-tiered definition means that people are either Missing or Absent. There is no grey area. The new definition went Force wide on the 24th March 2014

6.5 Public SafetyMissing / Absent Persons

Sefton Missing/Absent Pilot

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

Rep

ort

s

Absent 0 156

Missing 420 250

1st September 2012 - 31st March 2013 1st September 2013 - 31st March 2014

Knowsley

•Building now completely renovated. Services live 27th Jan 2014.

•All agencies in place –Social Care, RSLs, Health Services, Probation, Police, MFRS, Local Authority, MASH police inspector recruited.

•Data sharing agreement,vetting, MOU and working practice arrangements are completed/in place and working well.

•A 30-day review programme, 1st already completed, is in place.

St Helens

•Co-location working well; working practices being developed by practitioners.

•MASH procedures are being formally developed.

•MASH manager chaired meeting on procedures on 24th March.

•Draft procedures will be discussed in April.

•Health to co-locate in May.

Liverpool

•Multi-agency Design & Implementation Group (DIG) to design the MASH by June 2014 and implement by January 2015.

•Recent DIG visits to Sefton, Leyland and Staffordshire MASHs. A proposed Liverpool MASH process map has been submitted to the Governance Group for approval.

•LCC announced Careline will be managed by themselves in future rather than the private company Liverpool Direct Limited.

•DIG presently involved in assessing suitable premises for the new MASH.

Wirral

•Information Sharing Agreement almost signed off.

•Health Representative attached for trial period. Further trial period to take place and then possibly full time in future.

•DWP representative now attached 1 day per week.

•IT solution in development. We will also be using ‘Liquid Logic’ (the same as St Helen’s and Sefton).

•Progressing movement of MFH / CSE coordinator into MASH.

•Considering expansion of Police Teams in MASH (ie, FCIU).

Sefton

•Sefton safeguarding MASH team is located with relevant partners at St Peter's House and went live on 24th Feb.

•A MASH process is in place and is monitored weekly.

•ISA has been agreed and a governance process in place.

•All work was completed well within budget.

•FCIU DI has responsibility for staff and safeguarding issues.

•Offender Management Inspector has responsibility for managing the processes and partnerships.

•Work is underway with partners to develop a Strategic MASH.

6.6 Public SafetyMulti Agency Strategic Hubs (MASH)

Medium Term

6.7 Public SafetyDomestic Offence Crime Outcome Rate

Short Term

Apr 13 - Mar 14 59.4% vs Target 0.1 pp vs Previous Year 1.1 pp 12 Month Trend Decreasing

Domestic Abuse

Vol. %Charges / Summons 2,611 85.9%Cautions / Warnings 332 10.9%

FPN 18 0.6%TIC 0 0.0%

Cannabis Warnings 1 0.0%Community Resolutions 76 2.5%Total Crime Outcomes 3,038 100.0%

Police Discretion 13

Apr - Mar 14