Upload
gayle
View
34
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Point LRF Forecasting Method. By: Brad Satkowski. Main Topics. Explanation of method Forecasts Verifications Forecast evaluation Recommendations. Explanation of Method. 3 sites in United States and 3 in Europe used Pittsburgh, Dallas, Chicago, Lisbon, Rome, Oslo - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Point LRF Forecasting Method
By: Brad Satkowski
Main Topics
• Explanation of method• Forecasts• Verifications• Forecast evaluation• Recommendations
Explanation of Method
• 3 sites in United States and 3 in Europe used– Pittsburgh, Dallas, Chicago, Lisbon, Rome, Oslo
• Recent 30 day temperature departure from normal• NAO and AO values documented during these
times• Find 5 other time spans with similar AO and NAO
trends• Past anomalies used to make forecast for March
2003 based on recent AO and NAO values
Forecasts
• Forecasts made on February 25, 2003• AO value on this date was approximately –0.500• NAO value on this date was approximately –1.000• Both had been negative for most of winter• Assumed trend would continue• Wrong assumption!
Forecasts
City Forecast
Pittsburgh 3-4ºF below normal
Dallas 1-2ºF below normal
Chicago 1-2ºF below normal
Lisbon 1-2ºF below normal
Rome 1-2ºF above normal
Oslo 2-3ºF below normal
VerificationsCity Forecast Verification
Pittsburgh 3-4ºF below normal +1.2ºF
Dallas 1-2ºF below normal -1.2ºF
Chicago 1-2ºF below normal -0.6ºF
Lisbon 1-2ºF below normal +1.9ºF
Rome 1-2ºF above normal -1.4ºF
Oslo 2-3ºF below normal +3.2ºF
Forecast Evaluation• Negative AO and NAO assumption
Date AO NAO
Feb. 25 -0.500 -1.000
February +0.128 -0.019
March +0.933 -0.072
Forecast Evaluation
• Dallas verifies, Chicago close• All other cities not even close to verifying• Persistent trough in Midwest allowed Dallas and
Chicago to verify• Trend seems to exist between AO and NAO
values, and temperature anomalies• Difficult to forecast AO and NAO
Recommendations
• Avoid forecasting extreme anomalies– Pittsburgh was big mistake
– Large anomalies occur less frequently
– Uncertainty also a factor
• Use more than just recent trends– Assumption of negative AO and NAO trend was wrong
– Different forecasts would have been made if entire month of February was analyzed
Conclusions
• Relationship between AO and NAO values and temperature anomalies seems to exist
• Must be careful when looking at AO and NAO trends
• More accurate predictions of AO and NAO can lead to better forecasts, especially for Europe and Eastern United States