Pnb vs de Guzman

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/21/2019 Pnb vs de Guzman

    1/4

    SECOND DIVISION

    PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK,

    Petitioner,

    - versus -

    THE INTESTATE ESTATE OF FRANCISCO

    DE GUZMAN, represented b HIS HEIRS!

    ROSALIA, ELEUTERIO, "OE, ERNESTO,

    HARRISON, ALL SURNAMED DE

    GUZMAN# $nd GINA DE GUZMAN,

    Respondents.

    G%R% N&% '()*+

    Present:

    CARPIO,J.,

    Chairperson,

    NACHURA,

    PERALTA,

    ABAD, and

    PERE,!JJ.

    Pro"u#$ated:

    %une &', ()&)

    x------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x

    DECISION

    NACHURA, J%!

    Liti$ants s*ou#d not +e a##oed to i#e identia# "otions repeated#/, speu#atin$ on t*e possi+#e*an$e o opinion o t*e ourt or o its 0ud$es. 1&2 3e e"p*asi4e t*is prinip#e in t*e present ase and

    arn t*e parties to desist ro" t*e pratie o i#in$ severa# "otions to dis"iss *i* a##e$e t*e sa"e

    $round.

    T*is is a petition or revie on certiorario Court o Appea#s 5CA6 Deision1(2dated Oto+er ((,

    ())7 and Reso#ution182dated Apri# &9, ())', *i* air"ed t*e denia# o petitioners "otion to dis"iss.

    Respondent ;ina de ;u4"an o+tained a P8)),))).)) #oan ro" petitioner, P*i#ippine Nationa#

    Ban

  • 7/21/2019 Pnb vs de Guzman

    2/4

    served +/ t*e s*eri o t*is ourt to deendant ;ina de ;u4"an at *er ne address in

    etro ani#a, in onsonane it* ?etion 8, Ru#e &7 o t*e &@@7 Ru#es o Civi#

    Proedure.

    ?O ORDERED.12

    No appea# as ta

  • 7/21/2019 Pnb vs de Guzman

    3/4

    3HERE>ORE, in vie o t*e ore$oin$, t*e otion to Dis"iss is *ere+/

    DENIED.

    No urt*er otion to Dis"iss s*a## +e entertained +/ t*is Court. Parties are

    direted to proseute t*is ase it* dispat*.

    ?et t*e ross-ea"ination o p#ainti Rosa#ia de ;u4"an Po/aoan on Nove"+er&', ()) at ':8) o#o< in t*e "ornin$.

    ?O ORDERED.1&'2

    On Nove"+er , ()), t*e RTC denied petitioners "otion or reonsideration.

    Petitioner i#ed a petition or certiorariit* t*e CA, assai#in$ t*ese Orders. On Oto+er ((, ())7,

    t*e CA denied t*e petition, ru#in$ in t*is ise:

    3HERE>ORE, t*e instant petition is *ere+/ DENIED. ACCORDIN;LF, t*e

    assai#ed Orders o Bran* 7, Re$iona# Tria# Court o ?an Car#os Cit/, Pan$asinan dated

    9 Oto+er ()) and Nove"+er ()), respetive#/, are A>>IRED.

    ?O ORDERED.1&@2

    On Apri# &9, ())', t*e CA denied petitioners "otion or reonsideration.1()2

    Petitioner t*en i#ed t*is petition or revie on certiorari,raisin$ t*e o##oin$ issues:T*e Court o Appea#s erred in *o#din$ t*at an e#e"ent o res 0udiata, i.e., t*at t*e

    disposition o t*e ase "ust +e a 0ud$"ent or order on t*e "erits is a+sent in t*e ase.

    T*e Court o Appea#s erred *en it ru#ed t*at res 0udiata *as not set in so as to +ar t*e

    i#in$ o t*e seond ase.

    T*e Court o Appea#s erred in *o#din$ t*at t*e respondent *ad not vio#ated t*e ru#e

    a$ainst oru"-s*oppin$.1(&2

    T*e petition *as no "erit.

    T*e Court inds insuera+#e petitioners repeated i#in$ o otions to Dis"iss raisin$ t*e sa"e

    $round. In t*e t*ree previous otions to Dis"iss and in an o"ni+us "otion or reonsideration,

    petitioner ar$ued t*at t*e present ase as +arred +/ prior 0ud$"ent and t*at t*ere as oru"-s*oppin$.

    Correspondin$#/, t*e issues *ad +een repetitive#/ passed upon and reso#ved +/ t*e ourt a quo.

    T*e "otions ere apparent#/ i#ed or no ot*er reason t*an to $ain ti"e and $a"+#e on a possi+#e

    *an$e o opinion o t*e ourt or t*e 0ud$e sittin$ on t*e ase. T*e otions to Dis"iss ere i#ed in a

    span o ive /ears, t*e irst one *avin$ +een i#ed on %une &, ())) and t*e #ast t*e su+0et

    "otionon >e+ruar/ &, ()), t*ree /ears ater petitioner i#ed its anser. In at, sine t*e irst

    otion to Dis"iss, t*ree 0ud$es *ad a#read/ sat on t*e ase and reso#ved t*e "otions. B/ i#in$ t*ese

    "otions, petitioner *ad disrupted t*e ourts de#i+eration on t*e "erits o t*e ase. T*is strate$/ annot

    +e to#erated as it i## entai# inevita+#e de#a/ in t*e disposition o t*e ase.

    A#t*ou$* t*e $round stated in t*e seond otion to Dis"iss as oru"-s*oppin$ and t*e

    su+se=uent "otions in#uded ot*er $rounds, nonet*e#ess, a## o t*ese "otions raised a si"i#ar ar$u"ent

    Gt*at sine t*e dis"issa# in t*e irst ase is a#read/ ina# and eeutor/ and t*ere is no reservation "ade

    http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/182507.htm#_ftn19http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/182507.htm#_ftn19http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/182507.htm#_ftn20http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/182507.htm#_ftn20http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/182507.htm#_ftn21http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/182507.htm#_ftn22http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/182507.htm#_ftn22http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/182507.htm#_ftn19http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/182507.htm#_ftn20http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/182507.htm#_ftn21http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2010/june2010/182507.htm#_ftn22
  • 7/21/2019 Pnb vs de Guzman

    4/4

    +/ t*e ourt in its 0ud$"ent t*at t*e dis"issa# is it*out pre0udie, t*e i#in$ o t*e seond ase is +arred.

    T*ereore, t*e su+se=uent "otions, +ein$ reiterations o t*e irst "otion, te*nia##/ partoo< o t*e nature

    o a "otion or reonsideration o t*e inter#outor/ order den/in$ t*e irst otion to Dis"iss.

    T*is is not t*e irst ti"e t*at t*e Court disa##oed t*e repetitive i#in$ o identia# "otions a$ainst

    an inter#outor/ order. In a para##e# ase, San Juan, Jr. v. Cruz,1((2t*e Court a