Upload
manojrkl07
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/27/2019 Ploidy Varation in Plants.pdf
1/4
Ploidy Variation in PlantsJames A Birchler, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
Ploidy variation involves changes in the number of whole sets of chromosomes. Aneuploid
variation involves changes in the number of individual chromosomes. The two types of
chromosomal changes have different consequences for gene expression patterns.
Polyploidy
Polyploidy is the situation in which there are multiplecopies of the genome present in a cell, an individual or aspecies. The term basic chromosome number (x) refers tothe number of chromosomes in a complete set, also knownas a genome. The gametic chromosome number (n) is thenumber of chromosomes in the gametophyte and thegametes. The term haploid refers to the gametophyte andcases in which the gametic numberis present in sporophytic
tissue. The term monoploid refers to individuals with asingle genome in the sporophyte. The most commonploidies are monoploid (1x), diploid (2x), triploid (3x),tetraploid (4x), pentaploid (5x), hexaploid(6x), heptaploid(7x) and octoploid (8x).
In diploid species, the haploid has a single genomepresent and is referred to as a monoploid. Haploids havebeen found in most taxonomic groups. They are smallerand have reduced floral organs compared to diploids.Haploids can arise via the parthenogenic development of acell in the megagametophyte, usually thought to be the eggor a synergid (Kimber and Riley, 1963). X-irradiation,delayed pollination and interspecific crosses can also
stimulate the production of haploids. In maize, haploidscan be generated by a certain inbred line (stock 6) thatproduces gynogenetic or maternal haploids in several percent of the progeny (Coe, 1959). The indeterminategametophyte (ig) mutation conditions paternal or andro-genetic haploids (Kermicle, 1969).
Monoploids are predicted to give complete genomecomplements in the gametes at a frequency of (1
2)n, where n
is the gametic number of chromosomes. Consequently,most spores (the endproductof meiosis) are missing one ormore chromosomes and abort. However, normal gameto-phytes occur at greater frequencies due to spontaneouschromosome doubling in premeiotic tissue, followed by
normal meiosis, which produces functional spores.One-third to one-half of all plant species are polyploids
of some type; however, in some cases, ancient polyploidshave evolved to the point that they behave as a diploid, as isthe case with maize. There are two types of polyploids.Autopolyploids contain multiples of the same genome,whereas allopolyploids (also called amphiploids or am-phidiploids) are derived from two or more differentgenomes. Allopolyploidy is more common than autopoly-ploidy.
Triploids can be produced from crosses betweetetraploid and diploid plants or by fertilization of diploifemale gametes, which result from failed meiosis. Thmeiotic behaviour of triploids has been studied extensivelin Jimson weed (Datura) and in maize (McClintock, 1929Satina et al., 1938; Punyasingh, 1947). The distribution ochromosomes in meiosis is nearly random. The resultinchromosome numbers range from the 1x to the 2x leveThe resulting aneuploidy causes seed abortion, whicexplains the nearly complete sterility of triploids. Banana
and seedless watermelon derive their sterility from the facthat they are triploids.Most polyploid plants are tetraploids. In allotetra
ploids, two different genomes are present. They arise fromcrosses between diverged species followed by chromosome doubling. Because the two sets of chromosomehave diverged, the pairing in meiosis occurs betweechromosomes that are most similar. This situation resultin bivalent formation in prophase of meiosis anconsequently in so-called disomic inheritance. In othewords, segregation in allotetraploids is the same as idiploid species, although most characteristics are controlled by duplicate genes, because two genomes ar
present. A recessive allele at both loci must be present fothe corresponding phenotype to result. The identical pairof homologues will preferentially pair with each other imeiosis rather than with the homologous chromosomesi.e. the partially homologous chromosomes derived fromthe two progenitor species.
In cases in which the chromosome number of a diploihas been doubled, an autotetraploid is formed. When thfour chromosomes synapse in meiosis they form quadrivalent and exhibit tetrasomic segregation. Ireferring to tetraploid segregation, the homozygoudominant, AAAA, is a quadriplex and the homozygourecessive, aaaa, is a nulliplex. The three types of hetero
zygotes are: triplex, AAAa; duplex, AAaa; and simplexAaaa.Autotetraploid segregation is affected by recombinatio
between the locus being followed and the centromerWhen exchange occurs between chromosomes carryindifferent alleles, the resulting products will be twheteroallelic chromosomes and two homoallelic chromosomes. If the heteroallelic chromosomes proceed to thsame pole in meiosis I, then in meiosis II both recessivmarkers could come together in the same meiotic produc
Article Contents
Secondary article
. Polyploidy
. Aneuploidy
. Polyteny and Endoreduplication
ENCYCLOPEDIA OF LIFE SCIENCES / & 2001 Nature Publishing Group / www.els.net
7/27/2019 Ploidy Varation in Plants.pdf
2/4
7/27/2019 Ploidy Varation in Plants.pdf
3/4
is a direct effect in which there is a direct correlation ofgene expression with the dosage of the varied segment, thatis, a reduction to 50% of normal in monosomics and anincrease to 150% in trisomics compared with the normaldiploid. Any one structural gene is typically affected byseveral aneuploid series (Birchler and Newton, 1981; Guoand Birchler, 1994).
The inverse effect appears to be the underlying basis ofthe dosage compensation found in larger aneuploids(Birchler, 1981). The inverse effect is of the propermagnitude to cancel a gene dosage effect when such atrans-acting regulator and its target structural gene arevaried together. The combination of a reduction to 50%resulting from a structural gene dosage effect and a 200%increase of a trans-acting inverse effect in a monosomicresults in an expression similar to the diploid. Likewise anincrease to 150% in a trisomic is cancelled by a reductionof each of the three copies to 67% of the normal level ofexpression. Dissection of large aneuploids that exhibitdosage compensation of alcohol dehydrogenase in maize
shows that smaller aneuploids surrounding the structuralgene exhibit a dosage effect, and another segment of thelarger aneuploid produces an inverse dosage effect, on Adh(Birchler, 1981). Thus, the basis of the compensationfound in larger aneuploids is the result of a combination ofa dosage change of the structural gene and a trans-actingregulatory gene, which inversely affects the structuralgene.
The changes (or lack thereof) in gene expression inaneuploids described above illustrate a much morecomplex pattern than mere dosage effects of the variedgenes. Indeed the majority of the varied genes are dosagecompensated, although a substantial fraction escape this
process to produce a dosage effect (Guo and Birchler,1994). Much more dramatic effects occur in the unvariedportion of the genome. The direct and inverse effectsproduce decreases and increases in both monosomics andtrisomics.
In contrast to the extensive changes in gene expressionthat occur in aneuploids, variation of the whole genomeproduces less extreme effects (Guo et al., 1996). A study ofmessenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA)levels from 18 genes ina monoploid, diploid, triploid and tetraploid series inmaize showed that the predominant response in a ploidyseries is an expression per cell that is directly proportionalto the ploidy level (Guo et al., 1996). Indeed, cell size
correlates with ploidy, suggesting that the increase incellular components will produce a larger cell; however,other patterns occur. The major exceptional effect is one inwhich there is a positive correlation with ploidy that isgreater than predicted fromthe change in ploidyalone.Theminor exceptional effect is a negative correlation withploidy.
Polyteny and Endoreduplication
In specific tissues in some species, deoxyribonucleic aci(DNA) replication has continued without cell division tcreate nuclei with many copies of the chromosome setWhen the entire genome is involved and the replicatechromosomes remain aligned, this situation is referred t
as polyteny. Several instances have been documented iplants, most notably in suspensor cells of several species obeans (e.g. Nagl, 1969). In the endosperm of maizeportions of the genomeare overreplicatedto produce mancopies in the cell, a situation referred to as endoreduplication (Grafi and Larkins, 1995). In several species thapossess small genome sizes, all portions of the chromosomes are endoreduplicated in a developmentally controlled manner (DeRocher et al., 1990).
References
Birchler JA (1979) A study of enzyme activities in a dosage series of thlong arm of chromosome one in maize. Genetics 92: 12111229.
Birchler JA (1981) The genetic basis of dosage compensation ofAlcoh
dehydrogenase1 in maize. Genetics 97: 625637.
Birchler JA and Newton KJ (1981) Modulation of protein levels
chromosomal dosage series of maize: the biochemical basis
aneuploid syndromes. Genetics 99: 247266.
BlakesleeAF (1921) Typesof mutationsand theirpossiblesignificance
evolution. American Naturalist 55: 254267.
Blakeslee AF (1924) Distinction between primary and seconda
chromosomal mutants in Datura. Proceedings of the Nation
Academy of Sciences of the USA 10: 109116.
Blakeslee AF (1934) New jimson weeds from old chromosomes.Journ
of Heredity 25: 80108.
Blakeslee AF (1941) Effect of induced polyploidy in plants.America
Naturalist 75: 117135.
Blakeslee AF and Avery AG (1937) Methods of inducing doubling
chromosomes in plants. Journal of Heredity 28: 393411.
Blakeslee AF, Belling J and Farnham ME (1920) Chromosom
duplication and Mendelian phenomena in Datura mutants.Scienc
52: 388390.
Clausen RE and Cameron DR (1944) Inheritance inNicotiana tabacum
XVIII. Monosomic analysis. Genetics 29: 447477.
Coe EH (1959) A line of maize with high haploid frequency. America
Naturalist 93: 381382.
DeRocher J, Harkins KR, Galbraith DW and Bohnert H (199
Developmentally regulated systemic endopolyploidy in succulen
with small genomes. Science 250: 99101.
Grafi G and Larkins BA (1995) Endoreduplication in maize: involv
ment of M phase-promoting factor inhibition and induction of
phase-related kinases. Science 269: 12621264.
Guo M and Birchler JA (1994) Trans-acting dosage effects on th
expression of model gene systems in maize aneuploids. Science 26
19992002.
Guo M, Davis D and Birchler JA (1996) Dosage effects on ge
expression in a maize ploidy series. Genetics 142: 13491355.
Kermicle JL (1969) Androgenesis conditioned by a mutation in maiz
Science 166: 14221424.
Khush GS and Rick CM (1966) The origin, identification a
cytogenetic behavior of tomato monosomics. Chromosoma 18: 407
420.
Ploidy Variation in Plants
ENCYCLOPEDIA OF LIFE SCIENCES / & 2001 Nature Publishing Group / www.els.net
7/27/2019 Ploidy Varation in Plants.pdf
4/4
Khush GS and Rick CM (1969) Tomato secondary trisomics: origin,
identification, morphology, and use in cytogenetic analysis of the
genome. Heredity 24: 129146.
Kihara H (1930) Genomanalyse bei Triticum und Aegilops. Cytologia 1:
263270.
Kimber G and Riley R (1963) Haploid angiosperms. Botanical Review
29: 480531.
Lilienfeld FA (1951) H. Kihara: Genome analysis in Triticum and
Aegilops. Concluding review. Cytologia 16: 101123.McClintock B (1929)A cytological andgenetical study of triploid maize.
Genetics 14: 180227.
Nagl W (1969) Banded polytene chromosomes in the legumePhaseolus
vulgaris. Nature 221: 7071.
Punyasingh K (1947) Chromosome numbers in crosses of diploid,
triploid and tetraploid maize. Genetics 32: 541554.
Randolph L (1932) Some effects of high temperature on polyploidy and
other variations in maize. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences of the USA 18: 222229.
Redei G (1964) Crossing experiences with polyploids. Arabidopsis
Information Service 1: 13.
Satina S, Blakeslee AF and Avery AG (1938) Chromosome behavior in
triploid Datura. III. The seed. American Journal of Botany 25:
595602.
Sears ER (1944) Cytogenetic studies with polyploid species of wheat.
Additional chromosomal aberrations inTriticum vulgare. Genetics 2
232246.
Sears ER (1953) Nullisomic analysis in common wheat. America
Naturalist 87: 245252.
Weber DF (1991) Monosomic analysis in maize and other diploid cro
plants. In: Gupta PK and Tsuchiya T (eds.) Chromosome Engineerin
in Plants: Genetics, Breeding and Evolution, Part A, pp. 18120
Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Further Reading
Haldane JBS (1930) The theoretical genetics of autopolyploids.Journ
of Genetics 22: 359372.
Mather K (1936) Segregation and linkage in autotetraploids. Journal
Genetics 32: 287314.
Muntzing A (1933) Hybrid incompatibility and the origin of polyploid
Hereditas 18: 3335.
SoltisDE andSoltis PS(1993) Molecular data andthe dynamic nature
polyploidy. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 12: 243273.
Stebbins GL Jr (1947) Types of polyploids: their classification an
significance. Advances in Genetics 1: 403429.
Ploidy Variation in Plants
4 ENCYCLOPEDIA OF LIFE SCIENCES / & 2001 Nature Publishing Group / www.els.net