PLM: future of production systems

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    1/44

    The Future of Production Systems

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    2/44

    SERVICE

    INDUSTRY

    & PLM

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    3/44

    INTRODUCTION

    Service business has been existing almost from thebeginning of civilization and yet we are stillexperiencing a trend towards a more and more service

    oriented world Current service applications range from adding service

    elements to industrial products for creating new serviceconcepts that are based on todays interconnected,

    digital and globally networked business environment.

    Today, leading service companies are proving thatservice development can be as precise as the

    development of tangible products.

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    4/44

    INTRODUCTION

    Challenges in applying the discipline of formal productprocesses are:

    Service is intangible often existing only in moment of itsdelivery

    It is difficult to make prototype and zero series to learn aboutdelivery in high volumes

    Experiments with new services are conducted live on customer

    Live tests magnify cost of failures(may ruin the brand)

    Hard to define, design and test in conventional way

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    5/44

    WHAT IS A SERVICE

    service is something very trivial. It is aneconomic activity which does not result

    in ownership; the action or process of serving or an

    act of assistance or a system supplying

    a public need such as transport, orutilities such as water or a publicdepartment or organization run by the

    state.

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    6/44

    A service is a process consisting of a series of a

    more or less intangible activities that normally,but not necessarily always, take place ininteractions between the customer and serviceemployees and/or physical resources or goods

    and/or systems of the service provider, whichare provided as solutions to customer problems.

    WHAT IS A SERVICE

    According to Finnish Professor Christian Gronroos

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    7/44

    A service is, a time perishable, intangible

    experience performed for customeracting in the role of co-producer.

    WHAT IS A SERVICE

    According to Mona and Fitzsimmmons

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    8/44

    Two Core elements

    Service is a process a sequence of

    tasks that will provide an end result(standard or customized) to a customer(internal or external).

    Services are physically intangible.

    CORE ELEMENTS OF

    SERVICES

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    9/44

    Heterogeneity It is a relatively difficult tostandardize service outcomes to some extent.Customers have individual, subjective expectations and

    they evaluate the outcomes and delivery of service(against their own expectations).

    Inseparability and simultaneity Many servicesare produced and consumed simultaneously and thecustomer is often present at the moment ofconsumption. Service consumption begins during theservice delivery.

    CHARACTERISTICS OF

    SERVICES

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    10/44

    CHARACTERISTICS OFSERVICES

    Time perish ability The service providerscapacity to deliver a service is time-perishable. Capacityto deliver a service at a given time is wasted, not the

    service offering itself or the resource for the service.

    Customer participation(co-production) Customersare often active participants in the service process, e.g.giving the basic inputs needed in order to initiate aservice.

    Transfer of ownership Service purchase doesnot result in transfer of ownership although it may

    result in a transfer of right to receive a service.

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    11/44

    Labor intensity Services almost always involveconsiderable human activity, rather than a preciselydetermined process..

    Intangibility - Usually services are claimed to bephysically intangible, i.e. non-physical, incapable ofbeing perceived by the senses.

    Heterogeneity-An other common claim in theservice industry has been that it is relatively difficultto standardize service outcomes or processes

    (variability in individual units of service production).

    CHARACTERISTICS OF

    SERVICES

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    12/44

    CATEGORIZING SERVICES

    i. Industrial services (maintenance, operation, optimization, etc., inindustrial production processes)

    ii. Transportation services (airlines, ferries, goods transportation,couriers)

    iii. Hospitality services (hotels, restaurants)iv. Health care services (hospitals, clinics, dentist)

    v. Government services (police, fire, mail)

    vi. Financial services (banking, insurance, investments)

    vii. Entertainment services (movies, concerts)viii. Professional Services (consulting, accounting, legal, design, project

    management)

    ix. Telecommunications services (fixed network access, mobilecommunication, attendant services)

    x. IT Services (application hosting, workstation management)

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    13/44

    THREE PRODUCT TYPES

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    14/44

    WHY SHOULD SERVICES BE MADE

    MORE TANGIBLE

    Service production and delivery is becomingmore and more industrialized. The globalmegatrend towards a service society and the

    ever growing demand for services in themarket

    Start building carefully defined, modular,

    configurable and easily repeatable serviceproducts, i.e. productizing and modularizingservices further, making them more productlike or tangible.

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    15/44

    REASONS FOR MAKING A

    SERVICE TANGIBLE

    Repeatability - A standardized servicedefinition makes it possible to repeat theservice multiple times exactly as defined.

    Volume - Use of clear, precise and standardproduct and information models in service

    design and production makes it possible to useIT-based support systems and automation inservice management and delivery in order tomultiply the production and delivery of the

    service products.

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    16/44

    Quality

    A standard service definition gives ability to deliverthe service with the same level of quality each time.

    A standard service definition gives ability to measureand steer the service quality in production anddelivery.

    A standard service definition gives ability to steerthe customers quality expectation and agree (e.g.SLA service level agreement) upon the quality to bedelivered to the customer.

    REASONS FOR MAKING A

    SERVICE TANGIBLE

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    17/44

    Efficiency

    More efficient use of resources in service production ispossible through streamlined service delivery processesand well defined services.

    More efficient use of resources and reduced time tomarket is possible through reutilization of productdefinition information when designing new serviceproducts.

    Load balancing -

    Load balancing in service production is easier due toknowledge and task transfer based on a standard way of

    defining a service and through service definitions.

    REASONS FOR MAKING

    A SERVICE TANGIBLE

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    18/44

    Analytical development Each service has to be defined and documented precisely using

    standard methodology for all products in order to be able to

    develop the service further using analytical developmentmethods.

    Customization and modularity Each service has to be defined based on common and

    standardized information and product models in order to be

    able to build and deliver customizable and modular services. Communication

    Standard service definition makes it possible to communicatethe service deliverables and required customer inputs preciselyto markets and customers.

    REASONS FOR MAKING

    A SERVICE TANGIBLE

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    19/44

    PRODUCTIZING THE SERVICE

    CONCEPT

    First step is creating a comprehensive serviceconcept definition: Analyzing needs of a customer:

    (a) Core needs

    (b) Secondary needs, and then

    How customer needs are met by the service

    Figure 40. Service concept by Edvardson and Olsson (1996).

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    20/44

    SERVICE CONCEPT

    A service concept includes always adefinition on a high level of the basic

    principles of services to be delivered: A definition of possible service content and

    the variation of different contents

    A definition of basic service process(definition of the service delivery)

    A definition of service deliverables on a high

    level

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    21/44

    NEEDS OF CUSTOMERS

    Service products match the needs of acustomer in two stages:

    i. Basic / Core Needs

    ii. Secondary Needs

    Basic/core needs core functions: a customerexpects that these functions are part of the

    product. The lack of these functions leadsdirectly to dissatisfaction. These functions alsousually determine the purchasing logic of thecustomer

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    22/44

    SECONDARY NEEDS

    Performance needs the capability to meetthese needs are most often evaluated incustomer satisfaction surveys. Inability tomeet these needs impacts customersatisfaction.

    Excitement needs if these needs arematched, the customer experience exceeds thecustomer expectations.

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    23/44

    Figure 41.

    Scaled examples of the

    possible benefit

    potential out of service

    productization

    regarding different

    types of service

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    24/44

    Table 5. Service definition grouping.

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    25/44

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    26/44

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    27/44

    Being able to build any kind of standardized service products

    Being able to modularize service products

    Being able to define the service levels

    Being able to manage products in a companys product portfoliosimilarly

    Being able to compare performance of delivery processes

    Being able to integrate processes end-to-end

    Being able to standardize the delivery of service products

    Being able to bundle a number of products together easily

    Being able to use standard IT-systems to support the delivery ofthe entire service portfolio

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    28/44

    In order to start utilizing the possibilities brought by IT and

    automation, a standard definition for a service-product within a

    company is needed. In addition to this a comprehensiveservice-product concept definition helps to realize practical

    benefits ofcreation, and delivery of service products

    An other practice that should be adapted from themanufacturing business by the service industry is the

    logic and relationship of product design and delivery.

    DEFINING SERVICE

    PRODUCTs

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    29/44

    SERVICE PRODUCT PROCESSES

    Figure 42. Service product development, the design documents or design dataand the service process (order-delivery process).

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    30/44

    DEFINING SERVICE

    PRODUCTs

    A service product is a product that has beendesigned through a carefully defined productdesign process and fulfils the following criteria:

    Information and product models exist (a service productis a part of the information and product models), i.e. it ispossible to define a service product as tangible productsare defined, based on a common model.

    A service definition exists and it includes thefollowing issues: Service content definition

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    31/44

    Service process definition (delivery) including tasks androles, resources, documentation for the process

    Service deliverables from the customer perspective

    Service KPIs (quality metrics)

    Service implementation definition regarding, e.g. businesssupport systems in delivery, support, billing, etc.

    Service interfaces

    A service description (document for internal and externalpurposes) exists.

    External communication materials exist.

    SERVICE PRODUCT

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    32/44

    PLM IN SERVICEBUSINESS

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    33/44

    the lack of logical, semantic and coherentdefinitions of what a service product is andwhat are the preferred ways to define a

    product.

    Service functions or features are not itemized,

    i.e. it is not possible to make a BOM (bill ofmaterial) like presentation of what the serviceconsists of, in a structured way.

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    34/44

    STANDARDIZED PRODUCT

    DEFINITION IS VITAL TO

    Modularize service products

    Define service levels

    Manage products in the product portfolio in the

    same way Compare performance of various processes

    Integrate processes end-to-end

    Standardize delivery of service products Bundle a number of products together easily

    to use standard IT-systems to support the

    delivery of the entire service portfolio

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    35/44

    PRODUCT STRUCTURE FOR

    MODULAR SERVICE PRODUCT DEF

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    36/44

    REQUIREMENT OF MODULAR

    PRODUCT DESIGN

    A product information model, including definitions forproduct and module and their relationships must bedefined.

    A product management concept must set the limits andrequirements for the product and module design anddocumentation so that it is possible to form productsout of modules.

    The product functions (the functions the customer willget) need to be itemized.

    Naturally the products must be such that it is possible

    to create them out of modules.

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    37/44

    TASK LIST

    Itemizei. Make items out of product functions (see

    next chapter: Making items out of productfunctions)

    ii. Define a piece of service to be a module

    iii. the module based on principles set in the

    product management conceptiv. Define if the piece of service, the

    module/item can be reused as a common

    module in other products as well

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    38/44

    Structurizei.e. make a product structure out of the modules(resembling hierarchical BOM bill of materials) Build

    a hierarchal structure out of the itemized pieces.

    Build configuration rules

    Set rules on how the itemized pieces of servicefunction together in the structure, i.e. if somemodel is mandatory or optional in the structure

    TASK LIST

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    39/44

    Finalize the product definition

    Finalize the service product definition using

    necessary description and specification documentsto capture and document all remaining productdefinition information (e.g. product implementation)

    TASK LIST

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    40/44

    Making Items out of product

    functions

    a systematic and standard way to identify, encode and name aproduct, a product element or module, a component, a materialor a service. Items are also used to identify documents.

    From the viewpoint of product lifecycle management, it isessential that items and their classification should be uniformwithin each company.

    It is essential also that items form separate classes,subclasses and groups at a suitable level of coarseness

    according to the companys own or, alternatively, widerinternational standards. In the electronics industry, forexample, diodes might form a component class, with Zenerdiodes as a subclass. The clear and logical grouping of itemsinto different classes eases the management and retrieval ofindividual items.

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    41/44

    An example of service item

    Figure 45.An example of a service item and its naming and coding.

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    42/44

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    43/44

    Al-Bukhari narrated from Abu Hurayrah, may Allah be pleased with him,that the Messenger of Allah was standing before the people one day when

    a man came to him and said, `O Messenger of Allah, what is Iman'

    He said:(Iman is to believe in Allah, His Angels, His Books, His Messengers

    and in the meeting with Him, and to believe in the Resurrection in the

    Hereafter.) He said: `O Messenger of Allah, what is Islam' He said: (Islam

    is to worship Allah Alone and not associate anything in worship with Him,

    to establish regular prayer, to pay the obligatory Zakah, and to fast in

    Ramadan.) He said, `O Messenger of Allah, what is Ihsan' He said: (Ihsan

    is to worship Allah as if you see Him, and if you do not see Him, then He

    sees you.) He said, `O Messenger of Allah, when will the Hour come' He

    said:

  • 7/29/2019 PLM: future of production systems

    44/44

    The one who is asked about it does not know more than the one who is

    asking, but I will tell you of some of its signs: when the servant woman

    gives birth to her mistress, that is one of its signs; when the barefoot

    and naked become leaders of the people, that is one of its signs. The

    timing of the Hour is one of the five things which no one knows except

    Allah: (Verily, Allah, with Him is the knowledge of the Hour, He sends

    down the rain, and knows that which is in the wombs....)) Then theman went away, and the Prophet said, (Bring him back to me.) They

    went to bring him back, but they could not find him. He said (That was

    Jibril who came to teach the people their religion)