Upload
olivia-maxwell
View
216
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Beverlea Frowen
Head of Health, Social Care and Well Being, Welsh Local Government Association
Health Impact Assessment: Making the Difference
Beverlea Frowen
DirectorSocial Services and Health Improvement
The Dragon’s Health: Breathing new life
Welsh Reflections on Healthy Public Policy
• Policy landscape• Key Drivers for Health Improvement• What Local Government is doing• Opportunities for the future
Policy Landscape
1.Twin Track approach- strong recognition of the value of ‘prevention’ and Local Governments role
2.Statutory duty to co-operate between NHS and LG
3.Public Sector collaboration not competition
• Wales: A Better Country
−“health & wealth creation at the heart of policy making”
• Health Challenge Wales
−Themes AND ‘any/every thing’ else
• Health, Social Care & Well-being Strategies
−Rebalancing prevention/promotion and treatment/care
• WLGA Approach
−Principles for health improvement and a support team
Policy & Structures at work…
Key actions progressing the agenda
• A new language for local government- creating the right environment
• Making the agenda more manageable
• Dedicated Health & Well-being Team
• Jointly launched HIA guidance in Nov ‘04
• Route to Health Improvement – May ‘06
The Route to Health Improvement
An organisational development package based on Five Key Features of a Health Improving Council
Health improvement is an integral part of all Council’s activity
1. Corporate Culture
2. Policy Development supports the core commitment to improve health
3. Collaboration brings added value to the
health improvement effort
4. Capacity totake forward theagenda is strengthened
5. Governance andPerformance Management
ensures healthy public policy
Keeping it simple – a new language
Life Circumstance
s
LifestyleShared Care
Improving & safeguarding the health of the most vulnerable people in society
Tackling the economic, social & environmental issues that impact on well-being
Encouraging & supporting
healthy attitudes and behaviour
Source: WLGA Route to Health Improvement.
HIA in ‘The Route toHealth Improvement’
“Health Impact Assessment…is used appropriately as part of
policy and decision making processes and in doing so builds partnerships
and fosters greater awareness of the collective impact of our actions”
Making linkages and learning
• Electronic database of notable practice• Self assessment framework and matrix of
three thresholds of status• Spearhead sites (building on learning zone
concept)• Stronger links to community planning• International network of collaborative
effort??
Three levels of preparedness
• Capacity - Leading the way..
• Members use community leadership role to drive health improvement
• Workforce and development planning focuses on health improvement
• Employees across the organisation have the appropriate knowledge, skills & attitudes for health improvement
-‘We don’t do health’
Three levels of preparedness
• Capacity – Getting there..• Awareness growing of potential to use
community leadership role
• Some employees in key positions understand the issues
• Health improvement is a side issue amongst roles and responsibilities and work force recruitment
Three levels of preparedness
• Capacity – Starting out..
• The community leadership role and community planning needs further development
• Health not a feature of organisational ‘psyche’
• Dominance of NHS to lead agenda
Where next for healthy public policy in Wales?
Councils acknowledged by all as health improvement agencies and in doing
so they are maximising the full potential of their roles and
resources
In the horizon
• Beecham Review
• Local Government white paper
• Changing relationships betweenCentral and Local Government
• NHS secondary care reforms
• New Funding regimes
The following have the potential to enhance our efforts or put the skids on some of it!
A final observation…
“inequalities in health are the most fundamental inequalities of all there is no greater inequality than being dead and being alive” Frank Dobson
Thank you for listening have a good second day and good luck with your efforts!
Beverlea FrowenDirector,
Social Services & Health Improvement
Mary Mahoney
Senior Lecturer and Coordinator, Deakin University, Australia
Health Impact Assessment: Making the Difference
This presentation will…
Map the territory – healthy public policy in
Victoria and the role of HIA
Introduce the context specific drivers for HIA
Model the attributes for ‘sustainable HIA’
Explore the threats to ‘the ducks’
Mapping – the political scene
3 levels of government - federal, state and local each with differing responsibilities
Each state and territory differs so it is not possible to generalise between states
Federal government is liberal (i.e. conservative), and all states are Labor
Local government in Victoria - amalgamations in 1993 moving from 210 to 79
Mapping – Origins of Impact Assessment
Project-focused Impact Assessment Prediction of impacts of a proposed development on the environment with social and health IA as integral processes
Origins: EIA → SIA → EHIA → Policy applications
Strategic planning and policy makingTypes: PIA + SEA + (P)HIA
Discrete applications IA types used for different purposes and driven by different needs in each context
Examples: SIA in LG
Mapping - Victorian policy context
State government level: All government agendas must reflect the Triple
Bottom Line principles of economic, environmental, social accountability
Whole of government focus on spatial disadvantage and health inequalities through Neighbourhood Renewal program
Increased emphasis on the social through A Fairer Victoria framework and the new state government Department of Victorian Communities.
Mapping - Victorian policy context
State level legislative requirement The Environment Effects Act (1978) for
the Department of Human Services to review all Works Approvals to ensure that public health is not endangered by any proposal. If DHS objects to the application Environment Protection Agency must refuse the application.
Mapping - Victorian policy context
Local government level: Health Act (1958) legislated a requirement for all
council to produce Municipal Public Health Plans (MPHP)
Local Government Act (2003) requires Council Plans to be prepared focused on the quality, sustainability, prosperity
Planning and Environment Act 1987 requires Municipal Strategic Statements linked to objectives for land use and development
Mapping - Supportive partnerships
Key partnerships between Government departments e.g. housing, public health,
infrastructure, sustainability and environment VicHealth Planning Institute of Australia (PIA) Municipal Association (MAV) Local government association (VLGA) Heart Foundation Cancer Council Victorian Council of Social Services
Mapping – supportive frameworks
Environments for Health Planning Framework - A practical guide to assist in the integration of
public health considerations into council’s broader planning responsibilities
Underpinned by principles of leading communities to better health and environmental dimensions of health i.e. built, social, economic and natural environments
Mapping – supportive frameworks
Other examples Leading the Way
introducing the social model of health to councillors Healthy by Design
resource for planners for designing liveable and healthy communities
VicLanes resource for LG on people’s health promoting behaviour by
location Safer by Design Guidelines
planning and design of safer communities Good practice funding
to support elements of MPHPs
Mapping - Implications for HIA
Status quo +: enhancing HIA in EIA but adding a specific HIA protocol developed and assessed by health sector
Checklist approach: specialist HIA using equity audits, RIS approaches and rapid appraisals
Strategic placement of HIA in decision-making: high level applications across government
Combined approaches: incorporating A, B & C Human or Sustainability: new whole of government
application with multiple methodologies (Source: HIA Forum, Melbourne, 2002)
Drivers for HIA – important features
In seeking to introduce HIA it was important to exploit all opportunities for formal mechanisms to
address the role of health in development argue for legislative status capitalise on existing strengths within the system build on existing goodwill, informal networks,
champions, community concerns, and changes occurring
develop a common agreement about language build on current guidelines to produce comprehensive,
well supported processes for all to use urge for improved access to evidence
Context specific drivers for HIA
Ranging from formal to less formal including: the need to comply with formally-required
processes the growing imperative to take health into
account in planning a growing awareness of the complexity of the
problems and the need for diverse solutions the growing awareness of the need to work
together Awareness of gaps within existing approaches
Context specific drivers cont’d
Comparisons between councils/departments Innovative practices emerging from within
government which provided examples for others
Availability of resources to support and encourage change (and dissemination)
Publicity about the potential role of HIA (timely, accessible, relevant and flexible)
Impetus to regenerate other forms of HIA in the light of new enthusiasm about its use in policy contexts
Progress in Victoria
Ministerial push for expanding HIA in Review of Health Act
Inclusion in further roll out of Neighbourhood Renewal programs
Funding for capacity building and demonstration projects across the state
Use in non-health sector and health care services
Integrated options under discussion Funded positions within government ‘Grass roots’ interest and commitment
Attributes for an effective and sustained use of HIA in HPP
Supportive agendas of government √
Appropriate organisational structures √
Realistic legislative requirements √
Enabling planning frameworks √
Willingness to adopt a social model of health √
Preparedness to adopt innovative approaches to planning √
Commitment by professionals to principles of HPP √
Desire to create a different future for the population through flexible policy and planning processes
√
Opportunities for intersectoral working across government √
In the Victorian context
It has been crucial to blend top-down support with bottom-up impetus, capacity building and driving
It has been less important to have legislative requirements than grass roots acceptance of the need for HIA and the value it can bring to current working practices
Threats to the ducks
HIA turning into a passing fad HIA seen as panacea delivering more than it can Unrealistic expectations about how quickly a new
process can be introduced HIA as an idea not an action Change of focus of the state government
With thanks …
for the chance to tell this story and close the loop to the key people who have guided our development to the people who have made available key papers,
and reports or developed websites which have permitted a sharing of knowledge
for the collegiality within the HIA network
So overall what does the Victorian situation actually look like?