2
introducing the… PLAY BETRAYAL CYCLE describing how the movements for children’s play in the UK have been betrayed, describing the cycle but not who is to blame… STARTAt 3 o'clock on the cycle where we won! Didn't we? Well look at it like this: we have a point on a cycle that goes on and on - here we have (in 2005?) the establishment of the ‘national body’, always on limited funding from government. We then see the rapid ‘growth of a funded infrastructure’ - schemes, inishatives, proh- jecks and ofcers and ‘development’ and ‘development ofcers’ (and interestingly, in the case of PlayEngland, many ‘incomers’ from the professional do-goodery sector - the charities and quangos and trusts and foundations - not even from the play eld, a massive increase in incomers compared with the previous NPFA and Playboard ‘infrastructures’. We also see this growth controlled by sucking up to government, showing o to local authorities ( producing strateg ies and lots of rushed plans with silly timescales that they partly invent and partly are arm-twisted to do) and ignoring the one part of the eld that is always here and is where play lives when it is not invited into the farmer’s garden - the edge of the wildwood of gra ssroots action. We won! we get ‘targeted (allegedly massive) government money’ (and the ‘dieback’ starts, quietly, in the undergrowth…) Ofcers of the glorious agency start using powerpoint and stop listening to play associations and the grass roots. The national body gets leaned o n by the ministry and suddenly there’s a bandwagon - hey play could do X, play could do Y, play could be a way of getting unemployed ‘youngsters’ a degree! Play could be funded as part of a glorious expansion of working class access to university! Media studies degrees for all! All shall have degrees! (Apart from Penny’s worker who got a weeks notice that his playwork degree was cancelled because play is waning and we can't get the tutors…) The grumbling is big style now, in the wild wood… as existing play organisations, play associations and play action bodies nd they can't get lottery money to continue their leading edge work, honed by 20 years of continuous experimentation , but some duckwit in a rural shire in the Leisure department thinks ‘I’m a genius, lets stick playstations in a coach and it’s rural e-play and the lottery clowns love it… This is how the waning starts - we see, as I say, a ‘waning of PVS’ (play voluntary sector). Then we get the cuts. Change of government, oil crisis, war, house price crash, whatever - cuts, which because of the waning, aren't e ectively opposed, because the grass roots are dying o and the eld feels betrayed by the national body, so we land in the wasteland again. We scurry back into the edge of the wildwood and grizzle. Grizzle grizzle. That’s me grizzling. Then we start the renewal (google David Hurst’s ‘Crisis and Renewal’ an eco-cycle model of change) with grass roots campaigning ( I’m suggesting). That’s where we are now - hiding in the long grass, watching the hunter-killers hovering overhead, busily signing petitions. The long march. Lobbying MPS and local councillors. Maybe an Early Day Motion. Maybe a Review by a nice safe unambitious politically naive MP who was a playleader (sic), or a teacher or a sporty motivator developmenty ofcer or something. Cue pictures of dicks in ties (never laydees - have u noticed that? always MPs being big daft lads. We’d say reliving their boyhood but they never were children, they are Nexus-5 vat-grown replicants, fresh from the lab, almost human. Never mind, smile, don't correct him when he says ‘playleader’, don't wince when he says ‘youngsters’ or ‘playgroups’. Go on marches. Buy new shoes. Just to nish a complete circle, if we continue rounfd it, which I’m arguing we SHOULDN'T - The next phase is the tipping poin t where suddenly it’s all happening - but beware hijackers! This is the point at which bandwagoning and co-option of our cause will happen - the point at which it starts to take o , and we lose it - you can't read my writing but at 12noon on my diagram it says ‘co- option by nationals’ meaning other bodies, with their own agenda getting involved. This time around we actually let our glorious revolutionary leaders invite the vampires in - that’s why the principled play activist Jan Cosgrove of FPFC resigned from CPC when national children's charities, quangoid outts like ROSPA and local authorities were invited into the tent as friends because it made political sense to a few people, drunk on their vision, to build a broad base or something). So then government announces a new National body..again….and around it goes.... Then we get the cuts…again…  What have we learnt? Shall we start the renewal? ©201 1 Arthur Battram, PleXity. Feel free to copy this to anyone but don't ttake my name off it, please or alter it unless you send me a copy - Creative commons- type rules. [email protected] page 1 of 1

play betrayal cycle5

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

8/7/2019 play betrayal cycle5

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/play-betrayal-cycle5 1/1

introducing the…

PLAY BETRAYAL CYCLEdescribing how the movements for children’s play in the UK have

been betrayed, describing the cycle but not who is to blame…

START⚡ At 3 o'clock on the cycle where we won! Didn't we? Well

look at it like this: we have a point on a cycle that goes on and on -

here we have (in 2005?) the establishment of the ‘national body’,

always on limited funding from government. We then see the rapid

‘growth of a funded infrastructure’ - schemes, inishatives, proh-

jecks and ofcers and ‘development’ and ‘development

ofcers’ (and interestingly, in the case of PlayEngland, many

‘incomers’ from the professional do-goodery sector - the charitiesand quangos and trusts and foundations - not even from the play

field, a massive increase in incomers compared with the previous

NPFA and Playboard ‘infrastructures’. We also see this growth

controlled by sucking up to government, showing o  to local

authorities ( producing strategies and lots of rushed plans with

silly timescales that they partly invent and partly are arm-twisted to

do) and ignoring the one part of the field that is always here and is

where play lives when it is not invited into the farmer’s garden -

the edge of the wildwood of grassroots action. We won! we get

‘targeted (allegedly massive) government money’ (and the ‘dieback’

starts, quietly, in the undergrowth…) Ofcers of the glorious

agency start using powerpoint and stop listening to play

associations and the grass roots. The national body gets leaned on

by the ministry and suddenly there’s a bandwagon - hey play could

do X, play could do Y, play could be a way of getting unemployed

‘youngsters’ a degree! Play could be funded as part of a glorious

expansion of working class access to university! Media studies

degrees for all! All shall have degrees! (Apart from Penny’s worker

who got a weeks notice that his playwork degree was cancelled

because play is waning and we can't get the tutors…)

⚡ The grumbling is big style now, in the wild wood… as existing

play organisations, play associations and play action bodies find

they can't get lottery money to continue their leading edge work,

honed by 20 years of continuous experimentation, but some

duckwit in a rural shire in the Leisure department thinks ‘I’m a

genius, lets stick playstations in a coach and it’s rural e-play and

the lottery clowns love it…

⚡ This is how the waning starts - we see, as I say, a ‘waning of 

PVS’ (play voluntary sector).

Then we get the cuts. Change of government, oil crisis, war, hous

price crash, whatever - cuts, which because of the waning, aren't

e ectively opposed, because the grass roots

are dying o and the field feels betrayed by th

national body, so we land in the wasteland

again. We scurry back into the edge of the

wildwood and grizzle. Grizzle grizzle. That’s

me grizzling. Then we start the renewal (goog

David Hurst’s ‘Crisis and Renewal’ an eco-cyc

model of change) with grass roots campaignin

( I’m suggesting).

⚡ That’s where we are now - hiding in the lo

grass, watching the hunter-killers hovering

overhead, busily signing petitions. The long

march. Lobbying MPS and local councillors.

Maybe an Early Day Motion. Maybe a Review b

a nice safe unambitious politically naive MP w

was a playleader (sic), or a teacher or a sportymotivator developmenty ofcer or something

Cue pictures of dicks in ties (never laydees -

have u noticed that? always MPs being big daf

lads. We’d say reliving their boyhood but they

never were children, they are Nexus-5 vat-grown replicants, fres

from the lab, almost human. Never mind, smile, don't correct him

when he says ‘playleader’, don't wince when he says ‘youngsters’

or ‘playgroups’. Go on marches. Buy new shoes.

⚡ Just to finish a complete circle, if we continue rounfd it, which

I’m arguing we SHOULDN'T - The next phase is the tipping point

where suddenly it’s all happening - but beware hijackers! This is

the point at which bandwagoning and co-option of our cause will

happen - the point at which it starts to take o , and we lose it -

you can't read my writing but at 12noon on my diagram it says ‘c

option by nationals’ meaning other bodies, with their own agenda

getting involved. This time around we actually let our glorious

revolutionary leaders invite the vampires in - that’s why the

principled play activist Jan Cosgrove of FPFC resigned from CPC

when national children's charities, quangoid outfits like ROSPA an

local authorities were invited into the tent as friends because it

made political sense to a few people, drunk on their vision, to bu

a broad base or something).

⚡ So then government announces a new National

body..again….and around it goes....

⚡ Then we get the cuts…again…

  What have we learnt?

Shall we start the renewal?

©2011 Arthur Battram, PleXity.

Feel free to copy this to anyone but don't ttake my name off it,

please or alter it unless you send me a copy - Creative common

type rules. [email protected] 

page 1 of 1