Plasma Stability in Alternate Confinement Concepts · PDF filePlasma Stability in Alternate Confinement Concepts Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, CA 94526 Global Climate

  • Upload
    vokhue

  • View
    220

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Plasma Stability in Alternate Confinement Concepts

    Lawrence Livermore National LaboratoryLivermore, CA 94526

    Global Climate & Energy Project WorkshopPrinceton

    May 1-2, 2006

    Work performed under the auspices of the U. S. Department of Energy by University of California Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract No. W-7405-Eng-48.

    E. Bickford Hooper

    UCRL-PRES-220891

  • I am pleased to thank many colleagues, including:

    Per Brunsell

    Rick Ellis

    Adil Hassam

    Dan Den Hartog

    Alan Hoffman

    Jay Kesner

    Harry McLean

    Dick Post

    Dmitri Ryutov

    John Sarff

    Uri Shumlak

    Any misinterpretations or errors are my responsibility

  • A wide range of Innovative Confinement Concepts (ICCs) contribute to the physics of plasmas and fusion-energy

    Macroinstabilities and microinstabilities may be present

    Macroinstabilities are large scale and usually described by fluid models, e.g. Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD)

    Microinstabilities are fine scale (typically with wavelengths comparable to the ion Larmor radius) and usually require kinetic descriptions

    This presentation focuses on macroinstabilities in ICCs

    These studies of stability complement those in tokamaks and stellarators

    Control of instabilities will be essential for any ICC reactor

  • Magnetic confinement devices have either toroidal or open magnetic field lines with the plasma weakly or highly constrained

    Highly ConstrainedTandem MirrorGas Dynamic Trap

    Weakly ConstrainedZ-pinchCentrifugal Confinement

    Highly ConstrainedTokamak*Spherical Torus (ST)*Stellarator*Levitated Dipole

    *The stability of the tokamak, ST, and stellarator are not discussed here

    Self-OrganizedReversed-Field Pinch (RFP)SpheromakField-Reversed Configuration (FRC)

    Toroidal

    Open

  • TOROIDAL SYSTEMS

  • RFP Low toroidal field makes safety factor q

  • Standard RFP operation: A spectrum of tearing modes develops through instability and nonlinear coupling.

    0 10 20 30

    1%

    0

    Toroidal Mode, n

    B ( a ) / B

    inner-most resonantm = 1, n = 6 B / B ~ 1%

    Nonlinear coupling between the modes leads to sawteeth dynamo events in which poloidal flux injected by the ohmic transformer is converted into toroidal flux

    The spectrum spans a wide range of toroidal mode numbers (n)

  • Electron heat transport in standard RFP agrees well with stochastic magnetic expectations.

    e(m2/s)

    r/a

    measuredpower-balance

    R-R

    Toro

    idal

    ,

    directly from field line tracing

    RR = vTeDm

    Dm = r2 /L

    predicted Rechester-Rosenbluth

    Field line tracing:

    use measured equilibrium B(r)

    fluctuation B(r) from nonlinear MHDcomputation using measured (r) andLundquist number (S 106)

    normalize B(r) to measured B(a)(< 2X correction required)

    ~~

    ~

    magneticdiffusivity

    Field line puncture plotFluctuations generate stochasticity

  • 0 10 20 30Time (ms)

    1.0

    0.5

    0

    B rms(%)

    1021027066

    ~

    0

    0.04

    0.08

    B(a)(T)

    Standard

    PPCD

    Pulsed Poloidal (inductive) Current Drive (PPCD) targeted to outer-plasma region reduces MHD tearing instability.

    (m2/s)

    r/a

    power balance

    R-R1

    10

    100

    1000

    The poloidal current (and toroidal field) are transiently reduced

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0

    Te(KeV)

    0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1r/a

    Standard

    PPCD-Improved

    The peak electron temperature increases significantly

    Field line puncture calculations show large areas of good surfaces

  • On the resistive-time of the conducting shell, external kink modes become resistive-wall modes

    Feedback control has been demonstrated on EXTRAP-T2R

  • RFP: Summary

    m = 1 resistive tearing modes develop at mode-rational surfaces, q = 1/n

    These modes grow to sufficiently large amplitudes that their islands overlap and the magnetic field becomes stochastic

    The electron thermal conductivity is large, the electron temperature profile flat and peak Te low

    PPCD changes the current and electric field profiles

    Mode amplitudes are significantly reduced and good flux surfaces are calculated in much of the volume

    The electron-temperature profile becomes peaked and Te is increased by ~ 3

    On the resistive time of the wall, feedback stabilization reduces the RWM amplitudes significantly

    The discharge duration is lengthened by a factor of 3

  • MHD stability in the gun-injected spheromak

    A large current is driven from the inner electrode to the flux conserver

    Following formation, the current flows through the donut-hole, forming a column which pinches as shown

    The spheromak lies inside the separatrix, shown in red

    Good energy confinement is found when magnetic surfaces are closed

    Closed surfaces require low magnetic fluctuation levels

    1 m

    SSPX (Sustained Spheromak Physics Experiment) a coaxial helicity-injected confinement experiment

  • MHD stability in the gun-injected spheromak

    = 0 j / B

    Magnetic fluctuations occur due to MHD modes:

    On the column (outside the separatrix) where the current profile is similar to a z-pinch

    The n=1 column mode drives current in the spheromak

    The column mode is stabilized for where

    and In the spheromak (inside the separatrix)

    Internal modes occur on low-order rational surfaces, q = m/n

    Generally, 0.5 q 1 Experimentally, best stability occurs

    when the q-profile lies between 1/22/3

    B = fcB 1< < 1.5 gun fc

    Experiment: low fluctuations with low edge , no low-order rational surfaces

  • The n=1 column mode reaches large amplitude (B/B~10%). Nonlinear processes drive magnetic reconnection events which converts injected toroidal flux into poloidal flux

    The reconnection events generate voltage spikes on the gun, seen both in experiment and in resistive MHD simulations

    The n=1 column mode dominates the spectrum

    The poloidal magnetic field and flux increase with each event

    Modeling and experiment show a consistent picture of the physics processes during spheromak formation and

    sustainment

    Te(experiment) is low during strong n=1 activity modeling (above) shows the magnetic surfaces opening in each event, dropping Te

    A strong n=1 mode develops during spheromak buildup and

    sustainment at high gun current

    E. B. Hooper, et al., Phys. Plasmas 12, 092503 (2005).

  • Internal modes in the experiment are found to occur when the q-profile crosses low-order rational surfaces

    Magnetic fluctuations correlate with the reconstructed q-profile

    Shown is the observed spectrum together with the maximum and minimum in the q-profile

    The q-profile is sensitive to the ratio of gun current to gun flux

    Safety-factor scaling with

    edge = 0Igun/gun

    Good energy confinement is found when the q-profile has no low-order rational surfaces

    H. S. McLean, Phys. Plasmas (to be published).

  • Spheromak: Summary

    The n=1 column mode drives current via a dynamo

    Injected toroidal flux is converted into poloidal flux by a reconnectionevent

    The reconnection event opens magnetic flux surfaces allowing a large thermal conductivity to the walls

    This large heat leak will require separation of the current drive phase from a reactor burn phase a pulsed or refluxed spheromak is probably required

    Internal modes amplitudes are small when the q-profile does not span the 1/2 or 2/3 surface

    Simulations find a similar effect, with poor confinement resulting when magnetic fluctuations generate islands or stochastic field lines

    Good energy confinement in a reactor may require current-profile control to shape the q-profile and maintain mode amplitudes < 1%

  • FRC Macrostability stability

    rc rsBo

    Be

    s

    Bi

    Stability depends on the geometry [prolate (shown) or oblate], external conducting wall, external magnetic mirror ratio, and other features

    The ideal FRC has no current along B and thus has no current-driven, MHD modes (pressure-driven only)

    Local ideal modes (n>>1) interchange, co-interchange (ballooning) are predicted to be unstable but usually not observed

    Stabilized by conducting shell, external magnetic mirror, etc.

    Global ideal modes in absence of rotation (n=0, 1, >1) axial shift, sideway shift, tilt may be theoretically unstable but have not been observed

    Global ideal modes driven by rotation have been observed

    Resistive tearing modes have been observed during formation

    Refs.: M. Tuszewski, Nucl. Fusion 28, 2033 (1988); H. Ji et al., Phys. Plasmas 5, 3685 (1998).

  • FRC Dominant global instability is usually the n=2, rotating interchange mode

    n=2 rotating interchange Driven by centrifugal force

    due to plasma rotation. Observed experimentally

    in most FRCsEnd

    View

    Side View

    Usually stabilized by external static multipole fields in -pinch formed FRCs.

    Instability not seen in translated FRCs due to development of moderate toroidal field and high shear.*

    Instability is stabilized by Rotating Magnetic Fields (RMF).**

    Finite Larmor-radius effects are usually stabilizing.***

    *H. Guo, et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 95, 175001 (2005).

    ** H. Guo, et al., PRL 94, 185001 (2005).

    ***E. Belova, et al., Phys. Plasmas 11, 2361 (2003