Planning Committee 2117 West River Road N Minneapolis, MN

Planning Committee 2117 West River Road N

Minneapolis MN 55411

Committee Meeting wwwminneapolisparksorg

August 19 2020 ~ Agenda ~ Wednesday 540 PM

Meeting Times are subject to change based on discussion from previous meetings

During COVID-19 - During the declared local public health emergency Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board has transitioned to an electronic format for its public meetings and hearings authorized under Minn Stat Section 13D021 to minimize the risk of exposure to or potential spread of COVID-19 Most Commissioners will call in and the meeting will be viewable live via webcast and TV options The video is also posted on the website usually two days after the meeting

I CALL TO ORDER

Chris Meyer Chair Commissioner District 1 Meg Forney Vice Chair Commissioner At Large Jono Cowgill Commissioner District 4 Londel French Commissioner At Large LaTrisha Vetaw Commissioner At Large

II APPROVAL OF AGENDA

III APPROVAL OF MINUTES

Wednesday August 05 2020

IV PUBLIC HEARING 630 pm TIME CERTAIN

41 Ecological System Plan Public Hearing

V ACTION ITEMS

51 That the Board adopt Resolution 2020-287 captioned as follows

Resolution 2020-287

Resolution Approving the Ecological System Plan

Resolution 2020-288

Resolution Approving Temporary Occupancy Under Section 4(F) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966 for the CSAH 5 (Franklin Ave) at

Committee Meeting P a g e | 2 August 19 2020

Chicago Ave 2021 Highway Safety Improvement Project a Portion of Which is Within Peavey Park

Resolution 2020-289

Resolution Approving Operations and Maintenance Declaration for Green 4Th Street in the Towerside Innovation District a Portion of Which is Within the Park Currently Referred to as Towerside Park

VI STUDYREPORT ITEM

61 Discussion of 1720 Marshall Street NE

VII ADJOURNMENT

August 5 2020 ~ Minutes ~ Wednesday 540 PM

During COVID-19 period we are adhering to social distancing recommendations the August 5 meeting will be held virtually Commissioners will call in and the meeting will be viewable live on City of Minneapolis Comcast channel 859 and CenturyLink channel 8002 and 8502 Although all commissioners will not be physically present the Board meeting is open to the public and social distancing will be encouraged

I CALL TO ORDER

The time being 1044 PM Chair Commissioner District 1 Chris Meyer called the meeting to order

Chair Commissioner District 1 Chris Meyer Present Vice Chair Commissioner At Large Meg Forney Present Commissioner District 4 Jono Cowgill Present Commissioner At Large Londel French Present Commissioner At Large LaTrisha Vetaw Present

RESULT ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER Meg Forney Vice Chair Commissioner At Large AYES Meyer Forney Cowgill French Vetaw

Planning Committee - Committee Meeting - Jul 15 2020 550 PM

RESULT ACCEPTED [UNANIMOUS] MOVER Meg Forney Vice Chair Commissioner At Large AYES Meyer Forney Cowgill French Vetaw

IV ACTION ITEMS

V STUDYREPORT ITEM

51 Presentation of the Draft Minnehaha Parkway Regional Trail Master Plan

VI ADJOURNMENT

Chair Meyer declared that the meeting was Adjourned

Packet Pg 3

Discussion Item (ID 5107) Page 1

TO Planning Committee FROM Michael Schroeder DATE August 19 2020 SUBJECT Ecological System Plan Public Hearing

BACKGROUND A public hearing for the Ecological System Plan will be held on August 19 2020 at 630 pm During COVID-19 During the declared local public health emergency Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board has transitioned to an electronic format for its public meetings and hearings authorized under Minn Stat Section 13D021 to minimize the risk of exposure to or potential spread of COVID-19 Most Commissioners will call in and the meeting will be viewable live via webcast and TV options The video is also posted on the website usually two days after the meeting

You may provide comments for the Public Hearing by phone by completing this Form before 1200 PM on the day of the meeting

- Speakers will be sent a call-in number and conference ID one hour before the meeting - Speakers can call into the meeting using the call-in number and conference ID at its the scheduled time - Speakers will enter the meeting and be placed on mute where they can listen - Speakers can watch the meeting through normal meeting broadcast -Be aware that there is a 20-30 second lag between the call and the broadcast Please turn off the broadcast sound when you are called on to speak The Ecological System Plan document will be made available several days before the public hearing at the project webpage httpswwwminneapolisparksorgpark_care__improvementspark_projectscurrent_projectsecological_system_plan The Ecological System Plan provides a framework for how environmental considerations can be addressed in ongoing planning operations and management efforts at MPRB Its main goals are to compile create and illustrate city-wide ecological data outline guiding principles for environmental management within the parks and challenge the community to rethink the city around them in terms of ecological function benefit and health

Packet Pg 4

RECOMMENDATION This item is for discussion purposes Prepared By Adam Arvidson Manager of Public Engagement amp Citywide Planning Strategic Planning Review Cindy Anderson Skipped 08052020 220 PM Adam Arvidson Completed 08052020 220 PM Michael Schroeder Completed 08092020 1005 AM Jennifer Ringold Completed 08092020 840 PM Al Bangoura Completed 08112020 1147 AM Planning Committee Pending 08192020 540 PM

Packet Pg 5

Resolution 2020-287 Page 1

Resolution 2020-287

Whereas The Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board (MPRB) is the steward of the Minneapolis parks

Whereas The MPRB was founded in 1883 by an Act of the State Legislature and has the responsibility to design improve and manage parks in Minneapolis Whereas The Board of Commissioners approved the formation of an appointed Community Advisory Committee (CAC) for the Ecological System Plan and the CAC has completed its charge to provide community engagement and technical guidance on that plan

Whereas The Board of Commissioners has authorized and staff has completed and tabulated the results of a 45-day public comment period on the Draft Ecological System Plan

Whereas Because significant time passed between the 2019 comment period and because significant revisions were made based on community comment staff re-released a revised draft plan for another public review in 2020 Whereas Staff has completed review of the 2020 comments and revised the draft again to reflect that additional engagement Whereas A public hearing has been scheduled to allow additional public comment on the final Master Plan

Whereas The Ecological System Plan provides a framework for how environmental considerations can be addressed in ongoing planning operations and management efforts at MPRB Whereas This resolution is supported by the MPRB 2007-2020 Comprehensive Plan which envisions ldquoUrban forests natural areas and waters that endure and captivaterdquo RESOLVED That the Board of Commissioners approves the Ecological System Plan and

RESOLVED That the President of the Board and Secretary to the Board are authorized to take all necessary administrative actions to implement this resolution

Packet Pg 6

TO Planning Committee FROM Michael Schroeder DATE August 19 2020 SUBJECT Resolution Approving the Ecological System Plan

BACKGROUND

This Board action considers approval of the Ecological System Plan This plan provides a framework for how environmental considerations can be addressed in ongoing planning operations and management efforts at MPRB Its main goals are to compile create and illustrate city-wide ecological data outline guiding principles for environmental management within the parks and challenge the community to rethink the city around them in terms of ecological function benefit and health Note that the Final Ecological System Plan document is not attached to this board action due to its size Instead it will be posted on the project webpage in concert with the public release of the Board agenda (httpswwwminneapolisparksorgpark_care__improvementspark_projectscurrent_projectsecological_system_plan) The planning process for the Ecological System Plan began in 2014 and has taken a winding route to this moment with several starts and stops as staffing levels and planning priorities changed over the following six years The planning process involved a Community Advisory Committee (CAC) appointed by the Board of Commissioners The CAC charge in this case was not to be a recommending body but rather a combination of technical reviewer link to community engagement and general process advisor The CAC met four times in 2014 and 2015 and an additional four times in 2017 During that time other in-person community engagement events took place The later years of the plan were marked by consultation with project partners and MPRB staff as well as the compilation of extensive research and mapping and the transformation of the myriad ecological ideas into implementable policies The official approval process began in 2019 and includes the following steps

◼ February 6 2019 The Board of Commissioners authorizes a 45-day comment period on the Draft plan which extends from February 14 to May 12 2019

◼ May 1 2019 MPRB staff presents the draft plan to the Board during the comment period as is customary

◼ A staff departure delays tabulation and revision of the draft document until 2020 ◼ May 1 2020 A revised draft document is re-released to the public because of the year

that had passed since the official comment period and because staff made significant

Packet Pg 7

changes to the organization of the document based on that earlier feedback ◼ Staff extends the opportunity for comments on the revised draft for two weeks because

the end date would have landed immediately after the weekend of unrest following George Floydrsquos murder

◼ August 19 2020 Public hearing and consideration of plan approval Master Plan Overview The Ecological System Plan is organized into four main chapters Water Air Land and Life Though we understand that all these ecological themes are interrelated a policy document must make some distinctions in order to be implementable Certainly some policy directions span these themes Each theme chapter includes researched background information on best practices examples of MPRB activities in that topic area and case studies from the MPRB system and elsewhere The policy direction included in the plan takes the form of a hierarchy of Goals Strategies and Recommendations The recommendations are the most detailed items and can be assigned and tracked The plan contains multiple resources for implementation

◼ Detailed maps provide resources to implementers and the public as well as direct work outlined in some recommendations

◼ A matrix of every MPRB park site shows which environmental focus areas are most applicable to that park

◼ A matrix of recommendations assigned each one to a particular department or division so progress can be tracked

Though the maps are not currently in a user-friendly public-facing format that is the ultimate goal of creating them The plan itself callsmdashin its recommendationsmdashfor the digitization and dissemination of these maps along with other accountability measures Process for Tabulating Public Comment A Draft Ecological System Plan document was presented to the Board of Commissioners on May 1 2019 during an open public comment period which ended on May 12 2019 Subsequently staff tabulated the public comment and considered modifications to the draft plan During the public comment period the Draft document was made available to the public on-line at MPRB headquarters and at several key MPRB public buildings Respondents were able to comment via on-line survey printed surveys at the buildings or by contacting the project manager directly by e-mail phone or regular mail Approximately 280 unique comments were received during that time Many of the comments expressed concern with the overall organization of the document or requested clarity on what the MPRB was committing to in the plan That general sentiment

Packet Pg 8

even more than specific individual comments drove a reorganization of the document and rethinking of how the policy recommendations are communicated The following is an overview of public feedback received in 2019 grouped into eight major themes Carbon Emissions suggestions to commit to a 100 zero-emissions fleet suggestions for more solar on park buildings Ecology and Habitat concern about prioritization of recreation over habitat suggestion for a stronger commitment to natural areas support for native plants and habitat connectivity suggestion for stronger language around light pollution Plan Functionality concerns about lack of detail and strength in the recommendations concern about the lack of accountability in the plan concern that the plan doesnrsquot link together topics and doesnrsquot go far enough Landscape Management suggestion to focus on native trees and plants support for reduced mowing and other environmental management practices Pesticides opposition to pesticide use in parks suggestion for extremely limited use of chemicals in parks Trees support for retention of standing dead trees for habitat suggestion to strengthen language around limiting tree removal suggestion to require no net tree loss from parks Water Quality suggestion for no net increase of stormwater runoff from parks support for strategies to reduce trash in water bodies Wildlife concern about lack of details related to wildlife and their habitat opposition to current wildlife management techniques concern about limited mention of Mississippi Flyway suggestion to protect areas if high wildlife value from human impacts suggestion to adjust high impact activities in parks to avoid nesting and migration seasons suggestion to require buildings and lighting to be bird safe All the data from the 2019 public comment period is attached to this Board action in several documents

bull The Theme Summary (Attachment B) organizes all the public comments according to major themes

bull The Public Comment Log (Attachment C) is a list of all public commentsmdashas summarized by MPRB staffmdashwith commenter names themes methods of transmittal and dates of transmittal This file is sorted by theme then by comment method then by commenter The summaries were generated by MPRB staff

Packet Pg 9

bull The Comment Files (Attachment D) are compilations of the full un-edited text of all public comments

Normally after a public comment period the MPRB would quickly bring a revised plan to the Board of Commissioners for a formal public hearing and consideration for approval In this case the document changed significantly based on feedback from the 45-day comment period and nearly a year had passed since the formal comment period ended Therefore the Revised Draft was released for another round of comments This round was not considered another formal 45-day comment period although it functioned similarly (Attachment A includes all comments received during this time) Based on this additional review staff has modified the Ecological System Plan again into the version being presented to the Board for approval It is important to reiterate at this time that the CAC for this project was not a recommending body as charged by the board Therefore there is no CAC recommendation on this plan and the public comments are not considered in light of the impact on any CAC recommendation Staff has made modifications based on community feedback an additional focus group held as part of the comprehensive plan process and consultation with MPRB staff across the organization around what is possible and realistic The plan before the Board is a careful compromise of many points of view It charts a specific way forward around environmental performance It sets forth specific recommendations that can be assigned implemented and tracked over time The Ecological System Plan despite its long and winding route to final consideration by the Board of Commissioners will advance environmental performance across the system It will improve how the park system--and by extension the city and regionmdashconnects to the environment RECOMMENDATION MPRB staff recommends approval of the Ecological System Plan This action supports the 2007-2020 MPRB Comprehensive Plan through Vision Theme 1 Vision Theme 1 Urban forests natural areas and waters that endure and captivate

Goal Sound management techniques provide healthy diverse and sustainable natural

resources Goal Residents and visitors enjoy and understand the natural environment Goal People and the environment benefit from the expansion and protection of natural

resources

Packet Pg 10

ATTACHMENTS

bull Attachment A - EcoSysPlan_Comments on Revised Draft_2020-0701 (PDF)

bull Attachment B - Ecological System Plan_45day review_ThemeSummary (PDF)

bull Attachment C - Ecological System Plan_45day review_CommentLog (PDF)

bull Attachment D - EcoSysPlan_45DayCommentPeriod_All_200701 (PDF)

Prepared By Adam Arvidson Manager of Public Engagement amp Citywide Planning Strategic Planning Review Cindy Anderson Skipped 08052020 233 PM Adam Arvidson Completed 08052020 233 PM Michael Schroeder Completed 08092020 1007 AM Jennifer Ringold Completed 08092020 842 PM Al Bangoura Completed 08112020 1215 PM Planning Committee Pending 08192020 540 PM

Packet Pg 11

Ecological System Plan Comment on Revised Draft

What is your nameThis information helps us keep track of everyones comments You may use just a first name orsome other name You may still do the survey multiple times with the same name

Sigrid A

What main Ecological System Plan topic area are youmost interested in commenting on

What would you like to share about that topic area

I find the recommendations to reduce chemical use extremely vague and unhelpful

39 1 Continue to reduce pesticide and fertilizer applications based on recommendations from partners and advisory groups

What partners and advisory groups are making the decisions about use of chemicals in parks Hoe much is being used and what are the rates or reduction What is the goal

39 2 Develop and maintain Pest Management Plan for facilities consistent with IPM program

This implies that there is in fact no plan for chemical reduction

In general this feels like gaslighting

Please tell us any other comments or suggestions you have regarding the draft Ecological System Plan in general

The system plan is very drafty and is not systems-based For example chemical use affects water animal life and vegetation but is not mentioned as it relates to the other areas

11COMPLETECOMPLETE

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Friday May 01 2020 43635 PMFriday May 01 2020 43635 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Friday May 01 2020 44132 PMFriday May 01 2020 44132 PMTime SpentTime Spent 000456000456

Packet Pg 12

Greg Lessard

22COMPLETECOMPLETE

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Monday May 04 2020 100707 AMMonday May 04 2020 100707 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Monday May 04 2020 104525 AMMonday May 04 2020 104525 AMTime SpentTime Spent 003818003818

Packet Pg 13

Im sorry but to create a feedback that in its design (Q2) asks you to pick a main topic to comment on is insulting and reinforces that these topics are separate and can be viewed independently and not as a whole and a system

Remember this feedback in on ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS

Water If a lake river stream creek or seasonal flood area (ground water) prior to industrial civilization was drinkable and free from things like Mercury and other made man persistent chemicals then they must be returned to that state

I agree with this water policy and their concerns but am sick and tired of hearing excuses made by city regional and state government as to why fundamental changes havent been made to drastically increase water quality in our city

I do not fault the Parks for this considering their ability to respond to the data they are seeing What I am seeing little of is how this one department or organization is allowed to get things done How are priorities set at the city metro and state level to ensure these projects dictate and inform public policy

As acknowledged the vast majority of water air land and animal situations we are seeing and setting goals to are from results completely outside of the parks control involve private parties and controlled through a complex network of political and social fiefdoms

Thank you for your continued efforts in keeping our urban lakes and waterways combustion engine free

Land I would also like to applaud the parks adoption of introducing Integrated Pest Management and the Xerxes Society Leave the Leaves policy

I dont think the light and noise pollution stance and goals are strong enough at all Sound and light is just as much a habitat as grass trees or water All animal plant and insect life need them and they are nearly all gone from a non-human standpoint and been replaced by human made sources This is unacceptable and its lack of being addressed in this plan is not acceptable

Constant additions to human made infrastructure in our parks is creating overdeveloped open spaces Another round of Parks Master Plans has been approved and the vast majority of them increase the made made infrastructure footprint and continue to reduce and control non-human elements within the park when considering improvements We must move on to an understanding that park improvements often times have nothing to do with humans or what human activities we can add to an open space but the opposite Why is everything framed from a human benefit standpoint This is not how ecology works and this is not how an animal within an ecology thinks or acts when contemplating its long term sustainability of its habitat and ecosystem

Air Air pollution from car traffic is not addressed enough in this Plan Banning and dramatically curtailing individual automobile usage to and from parks should be aggressively pursued

I support continuing the practice of seeking alternatives to individual parking spaces and parking lot additions in and around any city park

Lastly I think the fact we are trying to save Hiawatha golf course is an absolutely flawed idea and goes to the heart of whether or not these plans put together by the Parks really matter when it comes to money and power

Packet Pg 14

See above comments about how to address if and where this Ecological Plan has any political clout or teeth in actual policy at the city or regional metro area level

Having this plan is a great thing and I encourage an ecological and systems approach to non-human vitality diversity and sustainability in all aspects of governance and decision making

Thank you for your devotion to habitat connectivity and health for all of our relations and their future generations that will inherit our successes and our failures

Packet Pg 15

Thomforde Stephen

1 What was the take home message of the sheep story Was it a) grazing animals which the vegetation we are attempting to restore co-evolved with grazing animals for millions of years and at some level of analysis all grassland-savanna vegetation was obligate to grazing animals but that doesnt matter any more for what ever reason we dont require keystone processes anymore b) grazing sheep are the perfect herbivore to restore to urban environments restoring the second trophic level the keystone disturbance mechanism on vegetation and the lightly grazed pastures described are the perfect habitat for keystone oak regeneration and sheep provide a mechanism to uptake nitrogen which if N builds up undesirable species prevail and grazing sheep correctly can increase carbon sequestration and provide dung that feeds insects that feed birds (redheaded woodpeckers whippoorwills etc) and keep the brush down so cool breezes prevail and sheep grazing provides jobs and food and fiber products to local foodsheds so if we can increase ecological integrity biodiversity ecosystem function (90 increase in ecosystem function when energy in grass is transformed to herbivore) and ecosystem services why wouldnt we Or is it a)

Way way over emphasis on forest Why not emphasis the most advanced productive provisional terrestrial ecosystem ever - Savanna What do we (commensurate experience) mean by forest A treed landscape isnt necessary a forest and most often it represents a very sick ecosystem (afforested) Savanna is a grassland with grassland trees (it all evolved together) and whether youre standing in a savanna or a prairie is a principle of scale not type Your problems with invasive spp dominating your forest is a problem of too many trees the wrong trees (nitrophtyes) and excess nitrogen not the species they are symptomatic more than not of social myths The concept of true hardwood forest existing in this glaciated terrain is highly improbable You want to increase ecological integrity biodiversity ecosystem services (eg earth cooling) your model is savanna

33COMPLETECOMPLETE

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Monday May 04 2020 104537 AMMonday May 04 2020 104537 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Monday May 04 2020 40126 PMMonday May 04 2020 40126 PMTime SpentTime Spent 051548051548

Packet Pg 16

Seems like a lot of old ideas old narratives based on a lot of phyto-centric assumptions and social myths Seem like theres a lack of higher ecological principles guiding rational planning We end up doing the same old same old same old thing over and over again

What are you trying to restore hyper realities or functional ecosystems and what do you mean by ecosystem function not to be confused by ecosystem services Understanding function from a thermodynamic framework will greatly increase our capacity to apply reasonable land management that will at least make sense verses planting a flower (tree grass etc) list from an expert flower planner imposing upon us their top 20 hits

The tree list 5 5 5 5 3 is too simple You know what Eisenstein said about models right this one sides on the too simple side of his remark Is this the hypothesis are maples hackberry and oak equivalents or do some trees actually contribute more to ecological integrity than others Yes we dont want monocultures of shade trees lining the streets and yes this is a human dominated landscape but some species on the 5 list the more primitive spp can really work against attributes such as nutrient regulation cooling ground layer diversity capacity to promote multi-trophic food-webs

I was expecting more from the MPRB so much more

Packet Pg 17

Tahera Mamdani

the Ecological Systems Plan should explicitly incorporate the Mississippi Flyway and protect wildlife areas of high value from human impacts

We appreciate the care and attention paid to this project May God bless your efforts amen

44COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 18

Please do not omit the Mississippi Flyway as part of the Minneapolis Parks Ecological System Plan Incorporating the Flyway could have positive impact at the continent level not just the city Do the good thing Thank you

Please tell us any other comments or suggestions youhave regarding the draft Ecological System Plan ingeneral

Respondent skipped this question

55COMPLETECOMPLETE

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Saturday May 09 2020 90345 AMSaturday May 09 2020 90345 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Saturday May 09 2020 91218 AMSaturday May 09 2020 91218 AMTime SpentTime Spent 000833000833

Packet Pg 19

Andrew Willman

Please protect wildlife through the Mississippi Flyway project They should be our 1 priority

66COMPLETECOMPLETE

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Sunday May 10 2020 85658 AMSunday May 10 2020 85658 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Sunday May 10 2020 85836 AMSunday May 10 2020 85836 AMTime SpentTime Spent 000138000138

Packet Pg 20

I would like to thank the board for the recognition of light pollution impacts on wildlife Though several designations are mentioned I do not see Minneapoliss important status as part of the Mississippi Flyway mentioned in the Life section and I think that this perspective should be kept in mind as decisions are made

77COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 21

Sharon Schmickle

The plan should explicitly incorporate the Mississippi Flyway and protect wildlife areas of high value from human impacts

88COMPLETECOMPLETE

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Monday May 11 2020 124816 PMMonday May 11 2020 124816 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Monday May 11 2020 125027 PMMonday May 11 2020 125027 PMTime SpentTime Spent 000211000211

Packet Pg 22

Marian

I moved from Oakland CA to Minneapolis a year and half ago and the main reason I picked Minneapolis is because of the awesome nature-based recreation accessible to me within the city limits This is a major strength of the city and planners should recognized undeveloped open space and the amazing creatures in it as an asset and take steps to improve upon it

I suggest stronger protections for wildlife Setting aside land and habitat only go so far if there are no policies regulations to protect the plants and animals from the people sharing space with them We need stronger park policies on disturbing plant and animal life for example feeding harassing approaching bike path speed limits dog leash policies And policies are nothing without enforcement This is an opportunity to bring young people and minorities in as employed park rangers naturalists and interpreters versus entry level workers emptying trash cans and mowing lawns as is the case in my home park Powderhorn

Interpretation is another important aspect Investing in high quality accessible interpretation provides people with a greater connection to nature-based recreation and helps them understand the ecosystem with which they are interacting I would love to go to a naturalist-led tour of a city park and think many other people would too

Finally I would like to comment that investing wildlife protections and park enforcement is an equity issue I am a working class person who does not have a cabin up north or the ability to take excursions to national parks The city parks are where I go to experience nature and I know there are other people who do the same

To allow our parks to become overrun with motorized scooters dogs and otherwise well meaning people who litter feed animals and destroy plant habitats is to deprive working class folks of the opportunities other people of better means to enjoy wildlife

99COMPLETECOMPLETE

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Tuesday May 12 2020 70344 PMTuesday May 12 2020 70344 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Tuesday May 12 2020 72652 PMTuesday May 12 2020 72652 PMTime SpentTime Spent 002308002308

Packet Pg 23

Dividing the plan into air water and life is not indicative of a systems-based approach to ecology and I recommend you ask a trained ecologist to weigh in on your plan

Additionally I would encourage you to drop language that imply a binary between equity and environmental protections Access to green space and nature has so many health educational and well-being impacts on people My 7 year old next door neighbor is a 1st gen Somali-American obsessed with turtles He has only ever seen one at the Mall of America aquarium and I told him I would show him the Lake Harriet turtles once social distancing is over People like him who have opportunities to pursue their love of plants and animals are able to grow into their full potential as herpetologists wetland ecologists veterinarians or even just good turtle caregivers

This is just one example that I hope illustrates the need to eliminate phrases like balancing equity with environmental protections and other binaric phrasing during meetings and in official policy documents

Packet Pg 24

Karah Olson

Hi there I would like to advocate for the birds specifically that this Ecological Systems Plan should explicitly incorporate the Mississippi Flyway and protect wildlife areas of high value from human impacts Thank you for your consideration

1010COMPLETECOMPLETE

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Saturday May 16 2020 73635 PMSaturday May 16 2020 73635 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Saturday May 16 2020 73847 PMSaturday May 16 2020 73847 PMTime SpentTime Spent 000211000211

Packet Pg 25

Elizabeth

Please explicitly incorporate the Mississippi Flyway in your plan and protect wildlife areas of high value from human impacts With bird populations having declined 30 we need to do all we can to support them Minnesota is an important breeding ground for so many bird species itrsquos something that should be celebrated and promoted Hennepin County has one of the best park systems in the county and needs to continue to lead by example

Packet Pg 26

Serena Willey

The Ecological Systems Plan should explicitly incorporate the Mississippi Flyway and protect wildlife areas of high value from human impacts An investment in wildlife habitat protection and the restoration in Minneapolisrsquo parks system is essential Protection of the ecology of urban and park landscapes is tantamount to any long term plan

Packet Pg 27

Rita Doucet

It is vital for the protection of birds that the Ecological System Plan include the Mississippi River corridor as a protected area The build up and build out of the city has created a more dangerous set of obstacles for birds migrating both spring and fall through our area Protecting the Mississippi corridor as safe habitat for migration is essential You must incorporate the Mississippi flyway in the plan as well as other wildlife areas of high value protecting these from human impact

Hearings need to allow ideas and comments from the widest possible audiences and persons with concerns who are impacted by the proposed plan

Packet Pg 28

Karen Norberg

I would like to see bee lawns in our parks

More protection of the Mississippi Flyway

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Sunday May 17 2020 25322 PMSunday May 17 2020 25322 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Sunday May 17 2020 25434 PMSunday May 17 2020 25434 PMTime SpentTime Spent 000111000111

Packet Pg 29

Linda Huhn

First Im happy there is such a detailed plan and also for the people working in the park system at all levels who care about the qualitiy of our parks and the park experience for all but mostly for how the plans seek to preserve habitat for species other than us

Second because this continent has lost 29 of bird populations in the last 50 years according to a Cornell Ornithology Lab report from last fall birds especially should be considered Not the least of the details on birds is that 1) we still have too many building-related bird deaths More bird-safe glass and other well-known measures are needed

2) Invasive species reduce bird habitat particularly buckthorn Buckthorn should be pulled up rather than cut My observation is that by the time a cut area is due for another cutting much has sprouted leading to the need for endless cutting MUCH MORE PUBLICITY is needed that urges residents to remove it from their own property and calls for more volunteers to pull buckthorn from parks to get ahead of this population

Third Bee houses--Are the ones at Lake Harriet Park near the bandshell cleaned every other year I understand they can become filthy and unfit for habitation Good article in Southwest Journal on this

It is a scandal that we are killing our lakes with road salt What is being done to prevent irreversible damage

Packet Pg 30

Cindy Moews

Please include protecting the Mississippi Flyway and other valuable wildlife habitat areas from human impacts

Wildlife birds nature is what makes Minneapolis and Minnesota such a beautiful place to live People (like me) may take it for granted Please protect as much as possible Tell me (and everyone) how I can help over and over again

Get insights from as many groups as possible since they have their own perspectives

Thank you

Packet Pg 31

Jeannie

We live on the Mississippi Flyway I would encourage the Park Board to incorporate strong language and strategies to protect and provide habitat for both migrating and nesting birds One critical issue for spring arrivals is the availability of insects last yearrsquos seeds and berries nectar foliage and other necessities for fueling up and resting Planting and maintaining native plants that provide these necessities is very important I am very much in favor of planting much broader natural areas with native species in our parks

We really need to place a priority on educating the public about the need for and numerous benefits of less turf and more natural plantings Irsquom sure I donrsquot need to enumerate for you the benefits for the human recreational users of parks that accrue when we give equal care to the other species we share the parks with But many people donrsquot understand the inter-connectivity and that humans gain significantly when our co-inhabitants get their share of the priorities The park board can do a lot with public education to help park users become supportive of changes in vegetation and habitat

In reading through the plan I repeatedly see the need to educate the public so they too can become better stewards of our parklands and the large environment that surround them I think this needs to be a high priority

Packet Pg 32

Kate Olender

Please ensure that the Mississippi Flyway (httpswwwminneapolisaudubonorgblog2020421snsod1k33bay3xjwpx2t0srw2ce30zss_source=sscampaignsampss_campaign_id=5ebf3665077ad433f88e7741ampss_email_id=5ec0854e44af1600add4c99bampss_campaign_name=Audubon+Chapter+of+Minneapolis+Updateampss_campaign_sent_date=2020-05-17T003A293A09Z) be included in the Ecological Systems Plan Songbirds are already on the decline - lets protect them as they pass through and live in our Twin Cities

Packet Pg 33

W Lutz

In areas such as Roberts Bird Sanctuary and other Important Bird Areas I would like to suggest 1) planting cottonwood trees to be sure that Eagles have a place to nest when the big old trees die 2) protecting turtlesrsquo nests and access to water when the eggs hatch 3) protecting owlets from intrusions by photographers and others who disregard safety of the birds 4) prohibiting playback (playing of electronicdigital bird calls) in the natural areas by bird watchers and 5) prohibiting any spraying by MPRB personnel during critical migration times

Thank you for listening about the importance of Roberts Bird Sanctuary as a critcal habitat that needs protection and needs limitation of human activity (dogs bikes runners etc)

Also with the COVID situation and the over crowding by people during this time we have had a vivid reminder of the need to expand open and green spaces for humans as well as wildlife birds and plants

Packet Pg 34

Denise Scharlemann

We are writing to provide comment on the revised MPRB Ecological System Plan While it is clear that a great deal of thought and effort has gone into this document we believe that the importance of the Mississippi Flyway for migratory birds nationally and internationally as well as locally should be explicitly recognized in the section on Life Goals Strategies and Recommendations The Park Board can play a significant role in providing supporting habitat for migrating birds and protecting significant areas This should include developing strategies and advocating for policies that will mitigate the problem of bird mortality due to light pollution and building strikes

Packet Pg 35

Robert Cochrane

Packet Pg 36

Claire Price

I wanted to express my support for the move to support native plants and habitat connectivity reduce mowing and pesticide use and supporting migratory birds Thank you very much for all that youre doing its exciting to see initiatives like these gaining steam

Best Claire

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Wednesday May 20 2020 30602 AMWednesday May 20 2020 30602 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Wednesday May 20 2020 51842 AMWednesday May 20 2020 51842 AMTime SpentTime Spent 021240021240

Packet Pg 37

Christie Nixon

Keep the parks dark Artificial light has negative impacts on animals of all types whether they live in the parks or are passing by Disrupting their biological rhythms and behaviors will disrupt their short and long-term survival Humans too need dark places When is the last time you saw the Milky Way from Minneapolis Probably decades ago If lights MUST be used in parks follow International Dark Sky Association guidelines for lumens direction and control - (low Kelvin color - warm as possible confined to purpose area only (down not up and out) and movement (by people not animals) control Do not keep park buildings lit at night

Leave downed timber or dead trees in place During the last winter crews came through a part of Minnehaha Park that is near me and chain sawed the upper 23 of a 10 foot tree stump The removed piece contained a cavity that a woodpecker had nested in for at least the last two years (thats how long Ive been watching) Dont know why this partial removal let alone removal at all was needed Convenient height for the chain saw person Its still high enough for a car to hit Is less asthetically pleasing as a stump than it was as a natural trunk Parks should not be sterile they should be habitat If I want sterile Ill to to the soccer field

Be careful with rehabilitating any lake Look at the long term effects as well as the massive piles of dead fish youll see with any treatment Those massive piles make it easy to conclude that you had a success Yes you will kill carp and other rough fish but you wont kill them all and their populations will rebound Im intrigued by your electrofishing removal Thats a guaranteed annual rodeo but at least less harmful to other aquatic organisms than any chemical treatment Need any volunteers I was a DNR fisheries biologist for about 10 years

Keep doing streamside and lakeside habitat restoration and protection Natural vegetation is critical to terrestrial and aquatic health

Maintain and develop wildlife corridors at all scales through Minneapolis Work with surrounding cities and the counties to extend them

Packet Pg 38

Packet Pg 39

Janice Bisch

I think that it is important to move towards creating more native environments in more of our parks Less mowing more native plant areas less pesticide use

Packet Pg 40

Things I would like to see

our parks remain clear of plastics natural and forested

areas with some type of educational signage emphasizing ecological themes such as native plant and animal species how a forest works and evolves what this means for us as co-habitants of the earth how we maintain and nurture these spaces history of the land etc

amenities required to keep it clean like restrooms and more trash and recycle bins

park buildings be used as true community centers for people of all ages and interests and an emphasis on sustainable renewable energy used to run them

areas for sports and playgrounds shaded by trees or awnings to create comfortable seating space so people can still feel included and watch games or their kids even while seated

more community park open air theater spaces with stages and venues for neighborhood music art and gatherings

proper nigh lighting that doesnt light up the entire neighborhood but keeps the parks safe when dark

lots of available space to run around and play

Packet Pg 41

Packet Pg 42

Tyler Pederson

I see youve (weve) got 37 3 Map both formal and ad-hoc natural surface trails in the park system and identify those in need of improvement or closure to protect natural resources in the Life section (AWESOME) but perhaps it could also be in the Land section too If it were in the Land too it would address erosion which is the underlying cause of habitat or life disturbance

Maybe it could say Map both formal and ad-hoc natural surface trails in the park system and identify those in need of improvement or closure to protect sensitive landscapes from erosion

Ive made a similar comment in the Water section too

Thanks

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Wednesday May 20 2020 10844 PMWednesday May 20 2020 10844 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Wednesday May 20 2020 11334 PMWednesday May 20 2020 11334 PMTime SpentTime Spent 000450000450

Packet Pg 43

Tyler Pederson

I see youve (weve) got 37 3 Map both formal and ad-hoc natural surface trails in the park system and identify those in need of improvement or closure to protect natural resources in the Life section (AWESOME) but perhaps it could also be in the Water section too If it were in the Water section too it would address erosion impacting water bodies think fisherpeople near lake edges or rogue trails crisscrossing slopes along creeks

Maybe it could say Map both formal and ad-hoc natural surface trails in the park system and identify those in need of improvement or closure to protect shorelines from deterioration and water quality impairments

Ive made a similar comment in the Land section too

Thanks

Packet Pg 44

Charlie

Please do a LOT more related to conservation habitat connectivity and wildlife sanctuary Ban fireworks displays Ban pesticide use Plant ONLY natives Close the parkways to cars Build turtle tunnels wildlife underpasses and overpasses Stop mowing everything Leave more wild areas Consider wildlife when adding fencing to allow for migration

The system today is unbalanced with way too much dedicated to recreation and human use

Packet Pg 45

What is your nameThis information helps us keep trackof everyones comments You may use just a first nameor some other name You may still do the survey multipletimes with the same name

In order to improve air quality I would hope the MPRB would seriously consider opportunities to reduce vehicular traffic along parkways Unfortunately many of the parkway have turned into commuter routes with heavy amounts of traffic Not only does this create as unsafe environment for pedestrians and bicycles it also degrades the air quality for those using the parkway I think the MPRB could implement strategies fairly easily by simply closing certain portions or the parkways or adding stop signs and other traffic calming measures This would discourage people from using the parkways as commuter routes and make the parkways much more pleasant as we have seen during the coronavirus

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Thursday May 21 2020 115226 AMThursday May 21 2020 115226 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Thursday May 21 2020 115903 AMThursday May 21 2020 115903 AMTime SpentTime Spent 000636000636

Packet Pg 46

Im surprised that vehicle emissions of visitors within parks was not analyzed I think reducing the miles of parkway roads available to vehicles or slowing down vehicles on those roads would have a significant impact on air quality Converting parkways to being mostly pedestrians bicycles and transit would accomplish a reduction in vehicle emissions within the Minneapolis Park System Similarly reducing parking areas within parks would reduce stormwater runoff issues as well as heat island issues

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Thursday May 21 2020 120854 PMThursday May 21 2020 120854 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Thursday May 21 2020 121342 PMThursday May 21 2020 121342 PMTime SpentTime Spent 000448000448

Packet Pg 47

Betsy Blume

I think it is vital that the Ecological Systems Plan should explicitly incorporate the Mississippi Flyway and protect wildlife areas of high value from human impacts

Packet Pg 48

Mary Canino

12 As an environmental professional expanding SWPPPs to each park property seems excessive Parks that are relatively flat and small (ie neighborhood parks) may be better served by construction SWPPPs (as needed) or city-wide Best Management Practices Main contributors to degrading runoff water quality include 1) exposed soil by mechanical means (ie during construction or urban-agriculture) or 2) slumping or erosion of vegetation due to saturated soil (ie rain or flood) Where there is low likelihood of these contributors the cost of producing or maintaining an annual SWPPP may not feasible

Section 21 Soil contaminants Please disclose whatrsquos constituents are being analyzed in soil Is the concern direct-contact exposure or plant uptake Please disclose locations of sampling

Packet Pg 49

Alex Roth

While topics like natural areas and ecological restoration could fall into both Land and Life it seems like the Life section is where most of the IPM invasive plant management and overall ideas of habitat quality and connectivity are housed

There should be a much larger focus on protection and restoration of natural areas in this section (and in the plan as a whole) There need to be tangible goals for improving natural areas including things like remove and manage invasive plant species on x number of acres each year

MPRB needs to be devoting more staff and more funding to restoring healthy natural areas which will become more resilient support more pollinators and wildlife provide more ecosystem services and better protect people and wildlife from issues related to climate change

Please prioritize restoration and management of our natural areas

Packet Pg 50

3434INCOMPLETEINCOMPLETE

Packet Pg 51

Jessica R

Water quality is a huge issue for our parks city and state The strategies outlined for dealing with stormwater runoff at the park scale are useful and would be highly beneficial if implemented widely However the issue wont be able to actually be addressed without a city-scale stormwater management plan - along bike paths roads neighborhood parks etc These park areas even those not considered parks like boulevards and narrow lawn strips that are under MBRBs management responsibility have the potential to create a really robust stormwater network that manages both park and urban runoff Theres potential for this to be huge - managing water creating new habitat corridors reducing mowing and management creating seasonal interest through nativeadaptive plants creating educationalinterpretive features introducing landscape features to new neighborhoods (not just limited to those adjacent to lakes) Thanks for your work

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Monday June 01 2020 103732 AMMonday June 01 2020 103732 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Monday June 01 2020 104723 AMMonday June 01 2020 104723 AMTime SpentTime Spent 000950000950

Packet Pg 52

Katie Hill Brandt

Emissions from small engines have a huge impact on local air quality Transitioning to electric lawn mowers leaf blowers snowblowers etc should be a high priority for parks

Also wood-burning in parks (bonfires or as a source of heat at winter festivals) should be banned across the board Emissions from wood burning contribute to haze and have acute and chronic health effects

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Tuesday June 02 2020 92805 AMTuesday June 02 2020 92805 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Tuesday June 02 2020 93606 AMTuesday June 02 2020 93606 AMTime SpentTime Spent 000801000801

Packet Pg 53

Jennifer Smith

I want the work on invasive species to be paramount

Gas Powered Leaf Blowers have no place in the parks Their noise can be heard throughout all of Lake Nokomis when they are running They spoil the natural quietness of the morning and contribute to pollution The parks have just started to use them and it is an assault on the dignity of the environment the lakes and the people

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Wednesday June 03 2020 11207 PMWednesday June 03 2020 11207 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Wednesday June 03 2020 11522 PMWednesday June 03 2020 11522 PMTime SpentTime Spent 000314000314

Packet Pg 54

Carin Peterson

Introduction Maps or Recommendations Sections

My concern centers on The Mall There has been talk of taking away the ability to drive and to park on the last 2 blocks leading to the lakes- from Irving to the parkway I say this is unnecessary and unwarranted Those parking spaces cannot be replaced There is nowhere else in the area to make up for the loss of 50+ parking spots in an area already short on street parking

Instead keep the roads Turn the pedestrian walkway area into all native plants Plants that can absorb and filter storm water runoff racing downhill from Hennepin to the channel

And at the end of the mall ~ a sunken garden of native filtering plants

Same footprint Different mindset This way we address 1) need for more native habitat for pollinators amp birds 2) clean storm water before it hits the chain of make 3) saves MUCH needed parking 4) maintains traffic flow in an area always on need of additional outlets 5) encourages and fosters nghbd engagements as this is what nghbds want amp they could be involved in planning amp maintaining the gardens

Passive natural area in the heart of Uptown Bird watching from a nearby bench

This passive recreation is hugely important in a nghbd with MANY seniors

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Thursday June 04 2020 22621 PMThursday June 04 2020 22621 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Thursday June 04 2020 24310 PMThursday June 04 2020 24310 PMTime SpentTime Spent 001648001648

Packet Pg 55

Very good grand concepts I hope there is enough wherewithal to accomplish goals without destroying some of the things residents most enjoy about our parks

Packet Pg 56

Ginny Halloran

I applaud the Minneapolis Park Systems for the incredible job regarding putting together an ecological plan

Because these are relatively new related to scientific research areas I am especially impressed you have included carbon sequestration and biochar in your plan related to climate mitigation I hope you become leaders in these areas because the results are so promising to help with winwin climate mitigation solutions

Related to land healthy soil is a term that is missing in your document in my mind If you talk to some soil biologistsscientists they will speak to how diverse and complex the universe below our feet is and its been mostly fignored I would like to see the park board expand its ecological and educational efforts regarding healthy soil

Just one example ldquoSoil microbiologist and climate scientist Walter Jehne reminds us that water not carbon is the primary greenhouse gas and that water is responsible for most of the heating and cooling dynamics of our blue planet Water was left out of our current climate models because it was considered too hard to model (true) and because water plays such an enormous role in the climate that it was considered impossible for humans to influence (false)rdquo Healthy soil plays a significant part in this role httpsmediumcomdidipershousewhy-communities-should-invest-in-regenerative-agriculture-and-the-soil-sponge-431c27c8b34b

Nature has so much to teach us We are sooooo fortunate that our founding fathers incorporated that into our city through our park system I hope our park board takes that nature education and exemplification legacy and mission seriously to help us Minneapolis citizens become more aware and thus better caretakers of nature that enriches our lives so much

Thanks again for keeping Minneapolis a beautiful city in a park

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Friday June 05 2020 53650 PMFriday June 05 2020 53650 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Friday June 05 2020 55234 PMFriday June 05 2020 55234 PMTime SpentTime Spent 001543001543

Packet Pg 57

Please continue to balance your efforts Please consider setting up an online link for citizens to be able to contribute to the wider cause of your efforts - planting amp caring for the urban forest updating buildings playgrounds etc

Packet Pg 58

Lila M Smith

I am excited to see that you also want to expand habitat for pollinators and other wildlife Many of our parks are turf grass with some trees I understand that many people like to play on grass but every park would benefit by the addition of natural areas fronted by native gardens I love the more natural restoration parks and gardens but some parks have none and every community deserves a touch of healing nature For Parks with mostly ball fields I suggest including a path around them with native plantings I live in an area that lacks a nature trail and one mile from our closest park There is a peacefulness in walking in nature My ideal park would include a rain garden nature play area picnic area a Community Center native pollinator garden and a nature trail that would also serve joggers Thank you for advocating a better environment in our parks Right now we need healing healthy areas more than ever

I think it is great Improvements Training park crews on native plants adding new pollinator gardens and natural areas to parks and communities that lack them I am a volunteer that cares for Native Pollinator gardens but I can only do so much I think more habitat is needed and could be installed by Park crews Has the Park Board hired people to plan construct and maintain more native gardens and habitat

Packet Pg 59

Keith Prussing

The maps are very helpful

Recommendations are clear along with what departmentsagencies are involved

What are the intervals for regular reportingupdates and who is responsible for making this happen How will they be held accountable

With the difficulty experienced in Spring 2020 in obtaining clear and timely water quality reports at Cedar Lake and Lake of the Isles about the cyanobacteria bloom how will you work to better with the public about immediate and ongoing water quality issuesconcerns

What is the timeline for implementation of these proposals and what is the action plan

What are the specific funding sources immediately as well as into the future

There should be an amendment process to the Plan to allow for new information

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Monday June 15 2020 124136 PMMonday June 15 2020 124136 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Monday June 15 2020 125513 PMMonday June 15 2020 125513 PMTime SpentTime Spent 001337001337

Packet Pg 60

Gretchen H

I agree with the recommendations of others re grassy areas Too many areas in parks are green swaths of grass which no one actually uses or rarely uses The area of Powderhorn Park which is above and North of the lake comes to mind Planting that area not just with flowering lawns but instead with native gardens would turn an unused area in to an environmental aesthetic and even educational asset I always think about how small and sad the very small area of native plants is at the eastern side of Lake Nokomis is There are many many areas of grass in most of the major parks and even in the smaller neighborhood parks which could be much more of an asset if the grass was gone

Packet Pg 61

I generally support the comments regarding favoring native species in terms of trees and other plants

I strongly support the elimination of the use of toxins

As someone who often picks up plastic litter not because I enjoy it but because I cant stand to see it poised next to a body of water waiting to fall in I can say that litter in the parks and along the parkways is a problem In Minnehaha Park my most frequented and nearby park I often see litter from the nearby Dairy Queen and the fast food chains along Hiawatha It would be very useful I think if someone could reach out to those businesses and come up with ideas on how to reduce the waste generated by their products People need options to Sea Salt certainly but if less waste could be generated (dont automatically provide plastic tops and straws for drinks) and if the businesses themselves could somehow be involved in discouraging people from littering it would be helpful and better PR for their business than seeing partially empty DQ containers all over the place

I see little signs in my neighborhood that say water-friendly lawn It seems that this just means that they rake their leaves This is not being water or life-friendly Raking some leaves in to garden areas to be used as winter mulch and using a mulcher-mower on the rest would be so much more water-friendly than using chemicals on the lawn in Fall and Spring or even buying that nasty colored mulch that was probably produced in a non-sustainable way

Packet Pg 62

Surapaneni Vishnu Laalitha

I have detailed comments on multiple sections of the plan Ive copy-pasted them below If you wish to get an easily readable PDF version please email me at vishnulaalithagmailcom

Im part of the MPRB Climate Resilience workgroup I would love to take some time to talk through these comments in detail as well if possible

Once again kudos on the great work Laalitha

Packet Pg 63

MPRB ECOLOGICAL PLAN 2020 COMMENTS

As a physician focused on the impacts of climate change on health I applaud the breadth of the Ecological plan proposed by the Minneapolis Parks and Recreation Board

Park systems serve unique functions at the intersection of health climate and equity In cities our parks provide us solace through preserving nature Extensive research links parks with improved physical and mental health of communities MPRB has the ability to take on a leadership role and model climate-adaptive operations However unique to parks is not only the ability to reduce their carbon footprint but to sequester Carbon and help reduce the impacts of climate change

I reviewed the Ecological plan and offered some detailed critiques Irsquom very excited at the breadth of detail provided However the plan lacks urgency and the scale of action necessary to address the climate crisis

Please accept my following comments AWATER PREVENT DEGRADATION OF WATER QUALITY 1 Improve management of park-generated stormwater runoff

1 10 Prioritize replacement of asphalt pavement in areas where pavement is actively eroding and drains directly into the storm sewer system Comment Replace all asphalt pavements that require an upgrade with permeable pavement Despite high upfront costs this option has fewer maintenance costs reduces our dependence on fossil fuels and improves our water quality by preventing runoff When water runs off the asphalt it leaches PAH or polyaromatic hydrocarbons into our waters that are carcinogenic Phase-out all asphalt pavements in the Parks system by 2040

1 3 Assess the feasibility of green roofs and greywater infrastructure during all new building projects and significant retrofits Comment Involve local communities to build capital locally Question How can this be incorporated into the parks system without leading to inaction ie how will we determine the feasibility What measures will be in place to document that and communicate that with the public Our concern is that broadly written rules like this can lead to inaction 14 Reduce impervious surface area in parks- Specific focus on parking lots Comment Convert all parking lots into green parking lots as described by the EPA and other suggested literature by 2035 in order to minimize stormwater runoff with clear signage to indicate so

3 Reduce the amount of trash and sediment in water bodies 3 3 Install additional maintenance control devices such as SAFL Bafe and SAFL Snout at key stormwater outfalls in coordination with partners Comment Add an indicator to ldquoEliminate single-use non-biodegradable containers in parks by 2050 This includes all items sold on Parks property Have a scalable plan to reach this goalrdquo Comment In order to reduce trash in water bodies Baltimore City has implemented a device called ldquoMrTrash Wheelrdquo Collaborate on this innovation to reduce the amount of trash that ends up in our lakes

B WATER BUILD RESILIENCY IN THE FACE OF CHANGING WATER LEVELS

7 4 Design lakeshores and stream banks to withstand or accommodate projected future flooding and withstand a higher level of erosive energy using bioengineering and native plants wherever possible Comment KUDOS

Packet Pg 64

C AIR CONTRIBUTE TO IMPROVING LOCAL AIR QUALITY AND REDUCING URBAN HEAT ISLAND 11 Focus tree planting in areas identified as having high heat island or low air quality Comment Focus also on the type of trees and that these donrsquot create excess pollen generation Minnesota already has an increased pollen season due to climate change Climate change and related increase in temperatures and CO2 concentration lead to more pollen production

12 Reduce vehicle and equipment emissions 121 Examine fleet-wide emissions and estimate emissions generated by park employees then set reduction goals 122 Document and communicate options for hybrid and electric vehicles for all vehicle purchases 123 Develop small equipment inventory that includes emissions information then work to transition small equipment feet to alternative options such as electric or four-stroke

Comment Emissions here need to be further separated Emissions generated by Park employeesvisitors when they commute to workparks to recreate have to be separated from vehicle-emissions and equipment-emissions that are generated due to Parks operations

Once that is done the aim should be to get to Zero-emissions as advocated by the IPCC or the Minneapolis Climate Plan by replacing all vehicles and equipment with Zero-emissionselectric equipment (and not biodiesel or alternate fuels that ignore the emissions created during farming of crops that help create biodiesel and ethanol) - Eliminate all vehicle and equipment emissions by 2040 Reduce to 45 by 2030 Short-term goals are essential

126 Develop a transportation management plan and procedures for field staff that considers and optimizes travel time to and between parks and service centers in order to reduce overall vehicle miles and emissions Comment This is a great step We can work to incorporate changes wersquove had to make during the COVID pandemic into mainstream operations

15 Monitor air quality at wood processing facility - As the general public I would like more information about what the wood processing facility is why we need continued operations of a facility that creates particulate matter and what we can do to eliminate the wood processing facility altogether in favor of sustainable options for the planet and people

D AIR CONTRIBUTE TO CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION

14 Ensure maintenance of landscapes with fire does not coincide with air quality alert days Comment Intentionally partner with and incorporate ldquoTraditional Ecological Knowledgerdquo or TEK within our indigenous community to identify practices to use prescribed fires for ecological management

16 Reduce the agency-wide carbon footprint Comment We really have a chance to be science-based and bold in implementing climate plans here Aim for 45 reduction by 2035 and complete ZERO-CARBON by 2050 Following the IPCC guidelines

17 Advocate for and support carbon footprint reduction for park employees and visitors Comment Greatly appreciate this comment I would like to add more actionable items to this area Convert all eligible parking lots in the parks system into solar roofed-parking lots by 2045 that can then be used to store energy and charge electric vehicles This model is being currently employed on the West Bank of the UMN campus and there is great potential for collaboration This is also being implemented worldwide in a variety of locations These solar park partnerships could happen with local community solar farms to invest in our communities

18 Increase building efficiency 18 2 D i ffi i i t b ildi t th ti f t ti j i t

Packet Pg 65

18 2 Design efficiency into buildings at the time of construction or major improvements Comment Once again I request concrete goals I recommend all new MPRB buildings need to be LEED platinum-certified Any upgrades to buildings will also be in ways consistent with a platinum certification

18 3 Perform energy efficiency improvements as part of general building and grounds maintenance including door and window sealing HVAC improvements lighting improvements enhanced insulation and others Comment Preferentially contract local companies that perform these audits to invest in our communities

20 Sequester carbon in the park system and urban forest 201 Study the ability and potential of parkland and urban forest to sequester carbon and identify areas of improvement through landscape change (in partnership with natural areas management) and other practices Comment Intentionally partner with and incorporate ldquoTraditional Ecological Knowledgerdquo or TEK within our indigenous community to identify practices to sequester carbon

K LIFE PROTECT MAINTAIN AND EXPAND URBAN FOREST 43 Maintain and expand extents of the forest canopy 431Set specific and realistic goals for urban forest canopy coverage with input from the Minneapolis Tree Advisory Commission and share publicly Comment Outline the goal for ideal urban canopy for the Twin cities by 2022 in coordination with University partners Identify realistic milestones that help us reach our goal by 2040 Engage the public in efforts to improve and maintain urban tree canopy by using the ldquoadopt-a-treerdquo model

435 Continue pest monitoring and management programs in partnership with federal state and local agencies Comment Incorporate sustainable pest control measures including indigenous perspectives and knowledge

M REMAIN ACCOUNTABLE AND ADAPT WITH THE EVOLVING WORLD 49 Update this planrsquos implementation checklist and report at least annually to the MPRB Commissioners and general public Comment I applaud the accountability of MPRB I appreciate that you have considered re-evaluating your goals based on available future technology However I strongly recommend as the main takeaway for the overall plan to establish SMART (Specific Measurable Action-Oriented Relevant Time-bound) goals for all the indicators to track progress and remain accountable to the public

50 Communicate and coordinate plan implementation responsibilities of all departments and divisions Comment Based on the location of the Parks provide translations in languages to serve our Somali Hmong and other immigrant communities to make parks inclusive

Comment In addition an overall comment also is that there is a lot of language in the plan that states ldquowhen feasiblerdquo Irsquom concerned that this language could lead to inaction Eg Indicator 13 Assess the feasibility of green roofs and greywater infrastructure during all new building projects and significant retrofits I understand that green roofs might not be possible due to the type of building roof and other structural factors Feasibility could also be due to lack of funding or lack of willingness of the agency to undertake the said project Irsquom especially concerned that this would be interpreted too broadly and invoked to slow down change especially on the front of climate action So I request the MPRB to provide a clear definition of feasibility to the public contingency plans in case a particular indicator is unable to be met and transparency as to why certain itemindicator was deemed not feasible

I also want to also thank the MPRB for extending the deadline on comments and your sensitivity to the collective crises of COVID-19 and racial injustice our city is dealing with I hope that these comments on this plan will only act as a starting point to more community

Packet Pg 66

and racial injustice our city is dealing with I hope that these comments on this plan will only act as a starting point to more community engagement and plans that match the scale of action this climate emergency deserves

DrVishnu Laalitha Surapaneni MBBS MPH

REFERENCES Parking Lot Sealcoat A Major Source of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Urban and Suburban Environments httpspubsusgsgovfs20053147

Extreme allergies and global warming httpswwwaafaorgmedia1634extreme-allergies-global-warming-report-2010pdf

httpswwwmndailycomarticle201809acsolar

Packet Pg 67

Packet Pg 68

Anjali Bains on behalf of Fresh Energy

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Monday June 15 2020 105427 AMMonday June 15 2020 105427 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Monday June 15 2020 91831 PMMonday June 15 2020 91831 PMTime SpentTime Spent 102404102404

Packet Pg 69

Comments below are given to assist in re-imagining ldquostrategiesrdquo as measurable ldquosub-goals as explained in our response to question 4

C AIR CONTRIBUTE TO IMPROVING LOCAL AIR QUALITY AND REDUCE URBAN HEAT ISLAND

12 Reduce vehicle and equipment emissions

Comment Fresh Energy recommends that Strategy 12 is turned into a collection of sub-goals specifically

bull 100 zero-emissions vehicles by 2040 for MPRB-owned light-duty vehicles bull Guidance issued by a set date (preferably within 12 months of the plan becoming final) on procuring low or no-emission alternatives to lawn care equipment and heavy-duty vehicles Guidance should be written such that goals of reaching carbon-neutrality in the City of Minneapolis by 2050 is achieved

bull Guidance issued by a set date on specific goals to reduce MPRB carbon emissions by creating efficient modes and systems of transportation for employees between park systems Guidance should be written such that goals of reaching carbon-neutrality in the City of Minneapolis by 2050 is achieved

16 Reduce the agency-wide carbon footprint

Comment As above Fresh Energy requests MPRB reimagines this strategy as a sub-goal that aligns with the Minneapolis 2040 plan of carbon neutrality by 2050 eg ldquoMPRB to reduce agency-wide carbon footprint such that carbon-neutrality is achieved by 2040 with specific step reductions (eg 45 carbon reduction over 2006 levels by 2030) set by specific date (within 12 months of Ecology Plan becoming final) Fresh Energy also recommends MPBR defines what ldquoagency-widerdquo indicates (eg operations building energy usage etc) and split up as needed to ensure subgoalsrsquo progress is able to be tracked

18 Increase building efficiency

Comment As above Fresh Energy requests MPRB reimagines this strategy as a sub-goal that aligns with the Minneapolis 2040 plan of carbon neutrality by 2040 eg ldquoMPRB to reduce net carbon emissions associated with building energy consumption to zero by 2050rdquo

Packet Pg 70

Fresh Energy commends the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board (MPRB) for revising their Ecology Plan based on community input and for extending their timeline in light of local uprisings and demands for long overdue racial justice The details and strategies outlined in the MPRB indicate a depth of research and consideration that is encouraging

However we urge MPRB to redefine their goals in specific measurable action-oriented and time-bound terms such that MPRB may track progress and hold itself accountable while offering transparency to the public on its metrics and progressFor example reduction of emissions from park operations is not a clear goal towards climate change mitigation net zero carbon-emission of park operations by 2050 would be a clear goal one rooted to both IPCC recommendations and the Minneapolis 2040 Plan To achieve this Fresh Energy recommends maintaining the high-level ldquogoalsrdquo denoted by the alphabet letters and transforming what is currently called ldquostrategiesrdquo to specific sub-goals with measurable action

In this change recommendations would map out a path to the sub-goal and should include both assessment and analysis as currently written with the addition of set decision points (tied to a time frame or deadline eg ldquoby this dayrdquo) that necessitate action based on the completed analysis

Finally we applaud that MPRB researched and reflected on goals of the City of Minneapolis as it put together the Ecology Plan Fresh Energy strongly recommends that the plan goes one step further and explicitly align with and reference relevant goals defined in the Minneapolis 2040 Plan as well as the Transportation Action Plan which closed its final round of comments on its draft plan earlier this spring Doing so will ensure that synergies between the City of Minneapolis and MPRB are recognized and leveraged ensuring efficiency in action and shared outcomes

Packet Pg 71

Irsquod like to see MPRB improve wildlife bird and insect habitat through promoting native tree and plant species especially those that historically existed in the area (oak savanna some mixed woodland) There is plenty of data out there suggesting non native plants create habitat dead zones for insects and birds Also oak savannas were prevalent in the Minneapolis area pre-settlement an ecosystem that is endangered in MN Why not restore savanna in areas where large oaks already exist (being crowded out by mixed forest trees) Thank you for your consideration

Packet Pg 72

Ryan Atwell

The plan needs more emphasis on preservation and restoration of native species and historical ecotypes (especially species and ecotypes that are threatened and endangered) MPRB parks are special I that they include (or have the potential to include) many of the species and historic ecotypes that are represented throughout Minnesota This is and will be increasingly important to Minnesotans in the future It is especially important to make note of the oak Savannahs and oak barrens that used to make up much of Minneapolis historical MPRB parks include many Such oak habitats some of which should be restored to savannah over time Aggressive approaches (including partnering with other organizations) to suppress invasive species need to be practiced to encourage native species using Integrated pest management approaches

Packet Pg 73

Claire Ruebeck Jocey Hale James Reid

See below

Packet Pg 74

Thank you for providing the chance to review the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board (MPRB) Ecological System Plan (ESP) The MPRB ESP is a robust document and reflects thoughtful and dedicated work We appreciate the opportunity to share feedback which is presented below by topic area

WATER bullA Elevate the goal to go beyond ldquoPrevent Degradation of Water Qualityrdquo to assertively ldquoImprove Water Qualityrdquo bullA6 Respond to water quality realities - Issue and evaluate timely water reports - Monthly water testing and reports - Post to online for public review - Develop swimfish dashboard - Annual MPRB Comprehensive Water Quality Report httpswwwminneapolisparksorgwp-contentuploads2019012017-Water-Resources- Reportpdf - Establish protocols for issuing public notificationsalerts for water risks - Identify degradation causes what would improve the situation what action to take (by government organization individual) ndash create community knowledge and call to action

AIR bullC Establish goal and strategies for no net loss of trees aim for aggressive net tree canopy gain the Minneapolis tree canopy is declining coordinate with Minneapolis Tree Advisory Group for goals and timeline restoring tree canopy and reaching canopy coverage goal is an environmental justice initiative

LAND bullE1 Prepare inventory of all contaminated parklands and prioritize mitigations complete Natural Areas Phase II report bullF Turf Management ndash to reduce mowing requirements replace recreation lawns with native ground cover (clover low maintenance stoppable ground cover etc) allow native plants to grow wild where appropriate bullG31 Modify master plans to protect trees and eliminate negative construction impacts bullH Human-Created Negative Impacts ndash add goal and strategies to reduce noise pollution from machinery building equipment traffic transit etc

LIFE bullJ40 Include water health as part of habitat corridors and connectivity bull421 Carefully evaluate when to utilize interpretive and educational signage in parks consider installation costs and maintenance evaluate smart phone options to direct and educate optimize opportunities to point to other park resources (ie identify direction and distance to other key features such as swim park Eloise Butler etc) bullL2 Develop public dashboard to report on mercury levels in fish and eating advisory bullAdd goal to protect bird and other wildlife and develop associated strategies

GENERAL bullESP Utilization - Incorporate the ESP by reference in the MPRB Community Engagement Plan requirements - Cross-reference to other key MPRB planning documents Neighborhood Park Service Area Master Plans Reconcile community approved design concepts to ESP there may be conflicts (tree removal etc) Natural Areas Phase I and Phase II reports Regional Master Plans

Packet Pg 75

bullAccountability - Establish timelines for implementing strategies and accomplishing goals - Define success for each strategygoal bullCommunications - provide regular updates via website e-blast e-newsletter (note it would be wonderful to have a regularly issued MPRB newsletter that compiles all project updates) bullTechnology ndash develop app(s) to promote and report on - SwimFish Minneapolis - Hike Minneapolis - Birdwatch Minneapolis - Volunteer opportunities bullFunding - pursue collaborative researchimplementation grants related to ecological systems

Packet Pg 76

From Stephen GreenfieldTo Arvidson Adam RCc Ann Laughlin Constance Pepin Schroeder Michael Bourn BradSubject [External]proposed changes to the Ecological System PlanDate Saturday May 30 2020 62505 PMAttachments MPRBESP_Revisions_May30pdf

MPRBESPRevisions_May30_RenumberedRdocx

Adam attached are files containing the combined comments on the draft Ecological Systems Plan fromAudubon Chapter of Minneapolis Friends of Roberts Bird Sanctuary and Friends of MinneapolisWildlife (Given the extreme distress and danger in our city were not sure if yoursquore working or how yourprojects other than Parks for All are affected or if the June 1 deadline for comments still applies) Wersquove included two versions of the file with our comments one file uses the original numbering schemebut because that numbering scheme didnrsquot lend itself to changes welsquove also created a ldquorenumbered filethat proposes a more flexible numbering scheme to make revisions easier

We value the opportunity to propose these final changes since as you stated the document has changedsignificantly and nearly a year has passed since the formal comment period ended We are requestingchanges based on our strong belief that ecological and wildlife considerations must play a larger role indecisions about Park Board planning projects programs and priorities We also observed in our carefulreview of the draft that numerous important notes and points in some of the chapters were not reflected inrecommendations hence we suggest that these points be added In some cases we suggested groupingitems that belong together

Please take a look at the renumbered file at your earliest convenience and let us know if you havequestions We would appreciate an opportunity to meet with you via Zoom about our input

Thank you Ann Laughlin Audubon Chapter of MinneapolisConstance Pepin Friends of Minneapolis WildlifeStephen Greenfield Friends of Roberts Bird Sanctuary [External] This email originated from outside of the Minneapolis Park amp Recreation Board Do not click links or openattachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe

Packet Pg 77

MPRB ESP Proposed Revisions 30 May 2020 1

A WATER PREVENT DEGRADATION OF WATER QUALITY

A WATER MAINTAIN AND IMPROVE WATER QUALITY

1 Improve management of park-generated stormwater runoff 1 1 Increase amount of stormwater infiltration filtration and storage and increase disconnected hard surfaces in parks 1 2 Improve Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPPs) to include more comprehensive record keeping exploration of stormwater capture and control and surface pollutant reduction and expand SWPPPs to all park properties with appropriate staff training 1 3 Assess the feasibility of green roofs and grey water infrastructure during all new building projects and significant retrofits 1 4 Reduce impervious surface area in parks 1 5 Protect and expand wetland and marsh areas that filter stormwater runoff 1 6 Develop a Clean Sweep Plan which explores additional street and path sweeping technology timing and schedule chloride management strategies and potential of new equipment 1 7 Improve winter maintenance plans to consider reduce salt use in parks including examining which surfaces are treated removal of excess salt around buildings and guidance on labor practices and equipment 1 8 Set and achieve maintenance and recreation staff training goals to achieve MPCA Level II Smart Salting Certification 1 9 Expand public education regarding salt impacts on water bodies through the website social media posts bulletins programs and incentives 1 10 Prioritize replacement of asphalt pavement in areas where pavement is actively eroding and drains directly into the storm sewer system 1 11 Require that all new projects minimize impervious surfaces and reduce impervious surfaces when possible 1 12 Require that all MPRB projects use on-site Best Management Practices [BMPs] to either decrease or not increase stormwater runoff 1 13 Continue to work with community partners and agencies including (but not limited to) watershed districts the City of Minneapolis Public Works Department the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and neighboring cities to better address and manage the collective impacts of polluted stormwater runoff into lakes and creeks [from Chapter 2)

2 Contribute to management of regional stormwater in the interest of regional water quality 2 1 Implement regional stormwater facilities BMPs in parks in partnership with City of Minneapolis and watershed districts only where envisioned in park master plans 2 2 Define roles and responsibilities for MPRB City of Minneapolis and watershed districts for management of stormwater facilities in parks and develop corresponding maintenance practices budget and repair schedule

2 3 Create fund and implement a stormwater BMP inspection maintenance and repair plan for MPRB staff including a catalog of BMPs installed in parks 2 4 Partner with the City of Minneapolis to implement best stormwater management practicesinfrastructure 2 5 Identify and analyze impairments and form strategic partnerships between local and state agencies and park stakeholders to effect change as needed [from Chapter 2] 2 6 Establish policies and practices to reduce adverse impacts on water bodies from specific pollutants [from Chapter 2] 2 4 Create a fund for BMP maintenance and repair [incorporated into 23]

3 Reduce the amount of trash and sediment in water bodies 3 1 Complete a trash impact study that identifies estimated volumes sources and solutions to meet target reductions at specific locations and in specific timeframes 3 2 Further promote the Cityrsquos adopt-a-catch-basin program 3 3 Install additional maintenance control devices such as SAFL Bafe and SAFL Snout at key stormwater outfalls in coordination with partners 3 4 Expand public education regarding proper waste reduction and impacts on water bodies 3 5 Work with City of Minneapolis and other agencies to remove sediment fans in water bodies 3 6 Stabilize eroding streambanks and shorelines 3 7 Create a fund to repair erosion in parks 3 8 Eliminate single-use plastic items at park events and facilities 3 9 Prohibit single-use plastic items at park events and by park users who need permits

4 Reduce water quality impacts from pets and geese 4 1 Develop a Bacteria Mitigation Strategy which addresses beach clean-up of goose feces 4 2 Continue and expand public education about no feeding of waterfowl 4 3 Continue and expand public education about dog waste collection and environmental impacts from dog waste 4 4 Examine locations of trash cans relative to pathways and relocate add or remove cans where necessary 4 5 Modify habitat to reduce food and preferred nesting areas and increase geesersquos sense of danger by reducing turf areas replacing grass with native plantings or materials leaving areas in grass to naturalize and stopping fertilizer use and watering to reduce young shoots 4 6 Reduce geese sight lines and limit their access to open water by establishing long grasses shrubs or other tall dense plants along shorelines that are thick enough to discourage nesting and where needed create barriers using fences hedges and a continuous band of emergent aquatic plants at the shoreline

5 Reduce impacts of point source pollution and pollutant spills on water bodies 5 1 Expand spill kit distribution in MPRB vehicles 5 2 Expand spill response material storage to at least one location per service area

5 3 Conduct internal and external education regarding spill prevention and response 5 4 Work with City of Minneapolis and other agency and research partners to identify and address point source pollution impacting parks and water bodies 5 5 Create with City Emergency Services a coordinated plan for accidents including those caused by transit or industrial accidents affecting water bodies

6 Respond to water quality realities 6 1 Continue water quality monitoring based on water clarity chlorophyll-a and phosphorous and add other testing regimes as warranted 6 2 Conduct water quality goal-setting sessions with internal staff and external partners 6 3 Prepare lake management strategies for each MPRB-managed water body 6 4 Continue partnerships with local and state agencies to remain aware of and address emerging contaminants 6 5 As part of MPRB planning efforts evaluate flood risk using the City and Watershed Districtrsquos most up-to-date flood mapping in order to achieve sustainable use and anticipate and address potential impacts due to flooding [from Chapter 2] 6 6 Continue the MPRB Lake Monitoring Program and use the Lake Aesthetic User and Recreation Index (LAURI) tool to communicate a recreational view of lake water quality

NEW 7 Develop and implement a policy of creating and updating management plans for surface water within the parks [from Chapter 2] 7 1 Assess current stormwater mitigation structure inspection protocols and maintenance operations to ensure that public investments are protected 7 2 Set measurable targets to improve surface water quality at specific locations within the parks 7 3 Define specific roles and responsibilities of different departments within MPRB the city and watershed organizations to address and mitigate stormwater runoff before it reaches lakes creeks and wetlands 7 4 Evaluate stormwater outfalls within the parks to determine whether any pollution controls might be added to help protect surface waters from further impairment

7 Design plan and manage park facilities in light of changing water levels 7 1 Utilize projected future flood plain analysis during planning efforts 7 2 Identify outfalls walls bridge abutments and other flood-threatened infrastructure during master planning efforts and develop proposed solutions in light of flooding projections 7 3 Create planting plans for trees shrubs and other vegetation to address water quality concerns based on an understanding of projected water regime 7 4 Design and naturalize lakeshores and streambanks to withstand projected future flooding 7 5 Identify and map flood-prone recreational infrastructure especially trails and develop detour plans that can be implemented quickly and with clear public notification

8 Continue and strengthen partnerships to address management of citywide stormwater infrastructure 8 1 Partner with City of Minneapolis and watershed districts in the creation of to develop park master plans and participate in partner agency efforts such as flood studies 8 2 Improve communication with partners and to the public about water management park impacts and other effects of increased precipitation

9 Continue to work with partners to understand evaluate and help to address as appropriate elevated groundwater levels

10 Expand public education to address water quality issues [from Chapter 2] 10 1 Offer ongoing public awareness and education events about water quality concerns 10 2 Raise public awareness of personal habits and choices that impact water in the parks including winter use of salt fertilizer for lawns and gardens feeding animals in the parks pet waste and leaf removal and proper use or disposal of grass clippings 10 3 Use environmental education to address challenges in public perception of water quality including naturally occurring water-based plants as visual cues

C AIR CONTRIBUTE TO IMPROVING LOCAL AIR QUALITY AND REDUCING URBAN HEAT ISLAND

10 Partner in regional heat island and air quality monitoring and studies [from Chapter 3] 10 1 Analyze existing data reflecting tree canopy urban heat island air quality testing results land cover types and impervious surfaces to obtain a picture of mitigation opportunities within the parks 10 2 Examine opportunities to increase tree canopy and reduce impervious surfaces in relation to other land covers to understand where best management practices might be used to gain the most benefits related to air quality 10 3 Identify which areas within the park system are best suited to protection enhancement and restoration based on existing land covers mow frequency and the potential need for soil improvement

11 Implement strategies to reduce urban-heat-island effect and address heat equity issues [from Chapter 3] 11 1 Use information from regional heat island and air quality monitoring and studies to evaluate and prioritize future projects in collaboration with other considerations within this plan related to water habitat and general park use to determine the best possible locations 11 2 Partner with the City of Minneapolis and other agencies to reduce urban-heat-island effect and address heat equity issues such as those recommended in the EPA Urban Heat Island Compendium

11 3 Increase tree planting in areas identified as having high heat island or low air quality

12 Reduce vehicle and equipment emissions 12 1 Examine fleet-wide emissions and estimate emissions generated by park employees then set reduction goals 12 2 Document and communicate options for hybrid and electric vehicles for all vehicle purchases 12 3 Develop small equipment inventory that includes emissions information then work to transition small equipment fleet to alternative options such as electric or four-stroke 12 4 Adopt Green Fleet procedures similar to City of Minneapolis fleet procedures including flex fuel protocols and idling standards 12 5 Complete service centers master plan with consideration of siting to achieve more efficient travel management 12 6 Develop transportation management plan and procedures for field staff that considers and optimizes travel time to and between parks and service centers in order to reduce overall vehicle miles and emissions 12 7 Prioritize purchases of hybrid and electric vehicles and equipment for replacement and new purchases 12 8 Develop and implement a plan (with a timeline) to transition to an all-electric fleet of vehicles and equipment for park operations 12 9 Track vehicle use to determine if smaller more efficient trucks can be used as large equipment is phased out of the fleet [from Chapter 3]

13 Reduce air pollution from park supplies and materials activities and events 13 1 Use low-VOC or no-VOC materials (paints glues cleaning supplies etc) in buildings and in maintenance activities wherever possible 13 2 Ensure maintenance of landscapes with fire does not coincide with air quality alert days 13 3 Monitor air quality at wood processing facility and adopt a plan to reduce emissions 13 4 Prohibit fireworks displays except an official MPRB-hosted display for Independence Day

13 Use low-VOC or no-VOC materials (paints glues cleaning supplies etc) in buildings and in maintenance activities wherever possible [incorporated into 13] 14 Ensure maintenance of landscapes with fire does not coincide with air quality alert days [incorporated into 13] 15 Monitor air quality at wood processing facility and adopt a plan to reduce emissions [incorporated into 13]

16 1 Complete a carbon footprint analysis including identification of areas of improvement and reduction strategies 16 2 Establish carbon footprint reduction targets and tasks and report at least annually on progress 16 3 Explore alternative energy purchasing programs to increase percentage of MPRB energy that is generated sustainably

17 Advocate for and support carbon footprint reduction for park employees and visitors 17 1 Promote transportation mode changes for MPRB staff and park visitors including remote work options shared EV pool vehicles bicycles scooters and transit 17 2 Improve information technology to allow for more effective remote meetings 17 3 Work with Metro Transit to evaluate and improve transit access to parks 17 4 Improve park access points for multi-modal users including ensuring curb ramps are properly placed and designed

18 Increase building efficiency 18 1 Complete agency-wide energy audit and identify areas of improvement 18 2 Design efficiency into buildings at time of construction or major improvements 18 3 Perform energy efficiency improvements as part of general building and grounds maintenance including door and window sealing HVAC improvements lighting improvements enhanced insulation and others

19 Explore alternative energy generation opportunities in parks 19 1 Explore geothermal and solar generation in areas determined suitable for those energy sources when improving or constructing buildings or other site improvements 19 2 Seek grants for additional solar andor geothermal installations

20 Sequester carbon in the park system and urban forest 20 1 Study the ability and potential of parkland and urban forest to sequester carbon and identify areas of improvement through landscape change (in partnership with natural areas management) and other practices 20 2 Explore use of biochar under athletic fields and in soil modification projects 20 3 Increase sequestration through improved landscape management practices including restoring and augmenting forests grasslands and wetlands with native plantings and reducing turf 20 4 Increase tree canopy planting only native trees or North American trees migrating north on parklands and City-owned property managed by MPRB 20 5 Continue and expand public education about the need to protect tree canopy throughout the city by watering street and boulevard trees [from Chapter 3]

E LAND MAINTAIN AND IMPROVE SOIL HEALTH

21 Conduct soil contaminant testing in parks where urban agriculture areas have been designated in park master plans

22 Utilize park development as a means of improving soil health with mitigation partners such as Hennepin County

23 Address soil compaction during park construction and after events 23 1 Conduct soil compaction tests at the inception of major projects and develop de-compaction strategies and extents 23 2 Explore use of biochar in park projects especially athletic fields as a means of de-compacting soils 23 3 Re-assess event fee structure to explore funding for decompaction of impacted parks

24 Minimize erosion and its impacts 24 1 Evaluate Minnesota Erosion Control Society best management practices for inclusion in standard construction project specifications 24 2 Evaluate current erosion control construction specifications to address and avoid wildlife conflicts and concerns and develop and implement wildlife- friendly standards 24 3 Complete slope analysis for mowing to determine best-fit equipment and modify mowing plans to assign specific equipment use to different slope types 24 4 Identify erosion problem areas throughout the system and develop plans for minimizing and correcting areas that are prone to erosion 24 5 Require that projects assess and prevent potential erosion

F LAND IMPROVE ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE OF TURF MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

25 Address environmental concerns around highly-managed turf 25 1 Pursue staff training and certification specifically the Turf Management Certificate for Water 25 2 Continue expansion of programmable higher efficiency irrigation controls especially at golf courses and premier sports fields 25 3 Identify opportunities to incorporate USGA Golf Course greening practices 25 4 Identify areas where turf is not serving a purpose (eg for sports or recreation) and replace with pollinator-friendly native plantings 25 5 Develop and implement a plan to transition to pesticide-free maintenance of turf throughout the Park system including for golf courses and premier sports fields 25 6 Explore additional methods to transition general park turf into lower mow areas or alternative land covers to further improve pollinator benefits as well as increase stormwater capture reduce erosion risk and add community-driven programs to park spaces [from Chapter 4]

25 7 Initiate mandatory pre-season mower and trimmer training to address slope equipment suitability compaction grass clipping redirection and tree protection 25 8 Develop standard procedures and protocols for vehicles driving on turf in order to limit compaction and damage

26 Initiate mandatory pre-season mower and trimmer training to address slope equipment suitability compaction grass clipping redirection and tree protection [incorporated into 25]

27 Develop standard procedures and protocols for vehicles driving on turf in order to limit compaction and damage [incorporated into 25]

G LAND REDUCE NEGATIVE CONSTRUCTION-RELATED IMPACTS

28 Review and modify construction specifications and practices to increase environmental and wildlife protections 28 1 Conduct mandatory pre-construction conferences to address environmentally and wildlife friendly construction requirements including materials selection and recycling 28 2 Install and maintain wildlife friendly erosion control devices during construction 28 3 Save and re-use site topsoil 28 4 Require weather protection of stored materials 28 5 Require that construction permits issued to other agencies include environmentally and wildlife friendly construction specifications similar to those used on MPRB projects 28 6 Require construction scheduling and project timing to avoid spawning nesting migration and pollinator emergence 28 7 Incorporate more sustainable and green building technology and materials into design guidelines 28 8 Protect trees during park development and other development affecting trees on public land 28 9 Train and monitor staff and contractors to minimize compaction and damage to park assets during construction 28 10 When athletic fields are rested and restored with new turf use the opportunity to place biochar under the grass to help improve soil health stormwater capture and air quality [from Chapter 4]

29 Consider construction scheduling and project timing in the context of nesting migration and pollinator emergence [incorporated into 28]

30 Incorporate more sustainable and green building technology and materials into design guidelines [incorporated into 28]

31 Protect trees during park development and other development affecting trees on public land [incorporated into 28]

32 Train and monitor staff and contractors to minimize compaction and damage to park assets [incorporated into 28]

H LAND REDUCE HUMAN-CREATED NEGATIVE IMPACTS IN THE PARKS

32 Reduce waste generated by and in parks 32 1 Develop public awareness campaign and staff training about proper waste disposal 32 2 Track diversion rates in park waste and set system-wide diversion goals including for MPRB-organized events 32 3 Adopt waste policies consistent with City of Minneapolis Green to Go Ordinance and Zero Waster Plan 32 4 Work with partners vendors and event organizers to ensure food and drink containers in parks are recyclable or compostable 32 5 Implement ldquodeconstructionrdquo rather than demolition during park projects to extract high value materials require contractors to recycle materials as possible and track construction waste diversion 32 6 Expand and improve signage to inform park visitors about allowed and prohibited activities in parks especially bird sanctuaries and other natural areas 32 7 Eliminate single-use plastic items at park facilities and events 32 8 Prohibit single-use plastic items at park events and by park users who need permits

33 Reduce light pollution generated by park activities and facilities 33 1 Implement International Dark Sky Association certified lighting 33 2 Identify areas where existing lighting can be modified or eliminated to limit light spill-over especially into natural areas 33 3 Provide staff training on light pollution effects on people wildlife and ecosystems dark skies and lighting impacts 33 4 Assess street and parkway lights for impact on parks and natural areas then work with partners to redirect shield or remove fixtures 33 5 Require that all park projects and funding requests follow Audubonrsquos Lights Out program guidelines International Dark Sky Association Lighting Basics standards and Minnesotarsquos B3 guidelines

34 Reduce noise generated by park activities facilities and events [from Chapter 5] 34 1 Require that all park machinery is operated in compliance with the Occupational Safety and Health Administrationrsquos permissible noise exposure limits 34 2 Monitor all park events to ensure permissible noise exposure limits are not exceeded

I LIFE PROTECT AND ENHANCE HABITAT QUALITY IN PARKS

34 Identify and preserve existing and potential habitat areas throughout the Park system 34 1 Redesignate the nine remnant plant communities that are identified in the 2007-2020 Comp Plan (approved October 17 2007) as areas of continued ecological importance for preservation and enhancement 34 2 Identify other remaining tracts of woodlands wetlands and prairie and protect these lands from fragmentation 34 3 Inform operations maintenance and planning projects including citizen advisory committees and community engagement plans of the need to preserve and expand habitat 34 4 Develop and update baseline data on wildlife in the parks including birds mammals amphibians reptiles insects fish and invertebrates using citizen science Bio Blitzes and other techniques

35 Develop and update baseline data on wildlife in the parks including birds mammals amphibians reptiles insects fish and invertebrates using citizen science Bio Blitzes and other techniques [incorporate into 34 as 344] 36 Transition from turf-focused parks management to a mixture of turf and naturalized areas ultimately reducing total acreage of turf 36 1 Develop maintenance guidelines for natural areas 36 2 Develop staffing plans that will allow for an expansion of naturalized areas in the parks including possibility of additional adding ecologist positions park-keeper gardener-type positions devoted to naturalized areas and analysis of cost and staffing impact on organization 36 3 Continue to work with local partners to restore and manage natural areas guided by park master plans and approved agreements 36 4 Expand use of fescue and drought tolerant grasses including native plants 36 5 Complete analysis of sites most suited to pollinator-friendly habitat lawns map their acreage over time and monitor success 36 6 Reassess equipment suitability and mowing heights to protect bird bee and butterfly habitat 36 7 Prepare prescriptive mowing plans that address height frequency timing and landscape slope in order to protect habitat

37 Enhance management of natural and naturalized areas in parks 37 1 Complete Natural Areas Management Plan 37 2 Increase technology capability in the field to include definitions maps methods and standards of maintenance 37 3 Map both formal and ad-hoc natural surface trails in the park system and identify those in need of improvement or closure to protect natural resources 37 4 Increase interdepartmental coordination on plantings mowing sight lines and general landscape management planning 37 5 Identify areas where standing or fallen dead wood can be left to enhance habitat 37 6 Add ecologist positions to manage natural and naturalized areas in parks 37 7 Follow guidelines published by the Xerces Society and leave fallen leaves in order to support insects pollinators and other wildlife [from Chapter 5]

38 Develop an invasive species management strategy in keeping with IPM principles working with state local and academic partners advisory groups

39 Limit use of Eliminate pesticides and fertilizers and use only as a last resort if mandated by MN DNR 39 1 Continue to reduce Eliminate pesticide and fertilizer applications based on research-based recommendations from partners and advisory groups 39 2 Develop and maintain a non-lethal Pest Management Plan for facilities park assets consistent with revise and rename MPRBrsquos IPM program

40 Organize and activate volunteers to enhance management of natural and naturalized areas throughout the Park system 40 1 Identify current effective volunteer projects and activities (such as MPRB Park Stewards and the Legacy Volunteer program at the Eloise Butler Wildflower Garden and Bird Sanctuary (EBWG) 40 2 Replicate and expand effective volunteer projects and activities 40 3 Expand MPRB volunteer coordination staffcapabilities to promote volunteerism and train monitor and recognize volunteers 40 4 Train front-line MPRB staff to coordinate with and support volunteer efforts

J LIFE INCREASE HABITAT CONNECTIVITY THROUGHOUT THE CITY

40 Implement identified habitat corridors (see map) 40 1 Prioritize planting of bird and pollinator-friendly native vegetation including street trees within identified corridors 40 2 Work with public private and non-profit partners within identified corridors to implement habitat restoration and enhancement projects including blooming boulevards green alleys habitat enhancement on public lands etc

40 3 Research track and report on plant life native trees and vegetation that will offer best pollinator habitat throughout the growing season working with state local and academic partners 40 4 Develop and implement wildlife-friendly corridor standards policies and procedures (including ramps turtle tunnels curb cuts signed crossings fences seasonal signage wildlife-friendly erosion control netting etc) 40 5 Continue to identify and implement ways to mitigate effects on wildlife corridors during MPRB planning and programming

41 Implement wildlife protection strategies for major construction projects and at significant roadway crossings of corridors 41 1 Identify sites with largest number of animal-roadway conflicts working with partner agencies as necessary and implement changes to reduce those conflicts 41 2 Develop and implement wildlife-friendly construction and maintenance standards policies and procedures (including ramps turtle tunnels curb cuts signed crossings temporary fences seasonal signage wildlife-friendly erosion control netting etc) 41 3 Implement wildlife-friendly construction and maintenance standards policies and procedures in partnership with the City of Minneapolis and Hennepin County as appropriate 41 4 Require a wildlife impact assessment and management plan as part of planning and permitting for construction projects and road work

42 Educate MPRB Commissioners and staff park visitors and the general public about wildlife

42 1 Educate people about wildlife as an essential component of a healthy ecosystem 42 2 Install signage to identify and protect wildlife corridors and habitat 42 3 Continue to develop and disseminate educational resources in the form of print map video or other media

K LIFE PROTECT MAINTAIN AND EXPAND URBAN FOREST

43 Maintain and expand extents of the forest canopy with native trees or North American trees that are migrating north 43 1 Set specific and realistic goals for city-wide urban forest canopy coverage with input from the Minneapolis Tree Advisory Commission and share publicly in annual reports on progress made 43 2 Improve integration of forestry with capital projects in parks to minimize tree removal and to capitalize on opportunities to increase urban canopy through post-project planting 43 3 Identify areas where soil compaction around trees is an issue due to general use or events and develop implement remedies 43 4 Expand pruning of young trees to ensure proper shaping and health as they mature

43 5 Continue Update and rename pest monitoring and management programs in partnership with federal state and local agencies 43 6 Continue to identify and implement ways to mitigate effects on the urban forest during planning and programming

44 Increase urban forest diversity to make it more resilient to climate change and invasive pests 44 1 Continue to partner with University of Minnesota to research and pilot new tree species in Minneapolis 44 2 Increase number of tree species and reduce overall percentage of single species as replanting takes place 44 3 Educate the public on what trees to plant based on future climate forecasts 44 4 Plant only native trees or North American trees migrating north except when as a last resort in areas where a native or North American tree would not survive 44 5 Prioritize the planting of trees that provide high ecological services (such as oaks) and stop planting trees from other continents that provide very low ecological services (such as gingko and Japanese tree lilacs)

L LIFE PROTECT AND ENHANCE AQUATIC HABITAT

45 Protect lakes wetlands and waterways from aquatic invasive species 45 1 Prepare an Aquatic Invasive Species Management Plan based on the Zebra Mussel Action Plan and Nokomis Carp Management Study 45 2 Continue AIS prevention and early detection programs 45 3 Update IPM to address aquatic plants

46 Develop an Aquatic Plant Management Plan that addresses fish habitat 46 1 Perform more frequent lake surveys as budget allows 46 2 Evaluate efficacy and need of aeration systems at the end of each systemrsquos useful life 46 3 Work in partnership with the City of Minneapolis Met Council Hennepin County and other agencies to maintain and enhance fish habitat

47 Work with local regional and state partners to monitor and address issues with waterfowl and mosquitoes 47 1 Plan and design structural BMPs so they are not breeding areas for mosquitoes per Metropolitan Mosquito Control District (MMCD) recommendations 47 2 Create public information campaign about biological mosquito control 47 3 Opt out of MMCD mosquito larvae treatments in bird sanctuaries and other natural areas throughout the Minneapolis park system 47 4 Continue to identify and implement ways to mitigate effects on aquatic wildlife during planning and programming

M LIFE PROTECT BIRDS AND ENHANCE BIRD HABITAT

xx Protect migratory and resident birds consistent with the goals of the US Fish and Wildlife Servicersquos Urban Bird Treaty program based on Audubon Minnesotarsquos Guide to Urban Bird Conservation for the Twin Cities and Surrounding Area xx 1 Protect restore and enhance urban habitat for birds and require that park projects and activities do not reduce habitat for birds xx 2 Improve bird habitat by requiring native trees shrubs and flowers in vegetation plans xx 3 Transition to a pesticide-free Park system to reduce threats to birds and the insects that birds eat xx 4 Opt out of MMCD mosquito larvae treatments in bird sanctuaries and other natural areas throughout the Minneapolis park system xx 5 Prohibit fireworks displays except an official MPRB-hosted display on July 4 xx 6 Reduce hazards to birds including by requiring bird-safe glass and other building materials and lighting on all MPRB projects and fundinggrant requests xx 7 Require a bird impact assessment and management plan for all projects and plans in the Park system xx 8 Require that all new park facilities and projects comply with the Minnesota B3 guidelines xx 9 Educate and engage citizens to care about birds and conserve their habitat through signage education programs and staff training xx 10 Continue to identify and implement ways to mitigate effects on birds during MPRB planning and programming

N LIFE PROTECT WILDLIFE AND ENHANCE WILDLIFE HABITAT

yy Prevent wildlife conflicts to reduce harm to wildlife yy 1 Increase public education about wildlife with interpretive and educational signage in parks yy 2 Expand educational programs for all age groups about the importance of wildlife and guidelines for observing and caring for wildlife yy 3 Require that construction projects maintenance schedules and major recreational events be timed to avoid spawning nesting migration and pollinator emergence yy 4 Require that all new park facilities and projects comply with the Minnesota B3 guidelines retrofit existing facilities whenever feasible yy 5 Continue to identify and implement ways to mitigate effects on wildlife during MPRB planning and programming

ZZ Adopt and implement humane wildlife management policies zz 1 Require that all MPRB staff and contractors prioritize humane non-lethal management methods for managing human-wildlife interactions and conflicts

zz 2 Adopt the International consensus principles for ethical wildlife control as a framework underlying the specific mitigation methods zz 3 Adopt and apply the Humane Society of the United Statesrsquo template Management Plan for geese zz 4 Adopt and apply the Humane Society of the United Statesrsquo template Management Plan for deer zz 5 Adopt and apply the Humane Society of the United Statesrsquo template Management Plan for coyotes zz 6 Adopt and apply the Humane Society of the United Statesrsquo template Management Plan for beavers

M REMAIN ACCOUNTABLE AND ADAPT WITH THE EVOLVING WORLD

TBD CONTINUE TO UPDATE TECHNOLOGY AND PLANS

48 Create interactive map layers in GIS based on the maps included in this document and make them publicly available on the MPRB website 49 Update this planrsquos implementation checklist and report at least annually to the MPRB Commissioners and general public 50 Communicate and coordinate plan implementation responsibilities of all departments and divisions 51 Update and modify this plan to account for evolving and emerging technologies every 5 three years 52 Communicate to the public the increasing urgency of MPRBrsquos environmental goals and initiatives

A WATER PREVENT DEGRADATION OF WATER QUALITY

A WATER MAINTAIN AND IMPROVE WATER QUALITY

A1 Improve management of park-generated stormwater runoff

a1 1 Increase amount of stormwater infiltration filtration and storage and increase disconnected hard surfaces in parks

a1 2 Improve Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPPs) to include more comprehensive record keeping exploration of stormwater capture and control and surface pollutant reduction and expand SWPPPs to all park properties with appropriate staff training

a1 3 Assess the feasibility of green roofs and grey water infrastructure during all new building projects and significant retrofits

a1 4 Reduce impervious surface area in parks

a1 5 Protect and expand wetland and marsh areas that filter stormwater runoff

a1 6 Develop a Clean Sweep Plan which explores additional street and path sweeping technology timing and schedule chloride management strategies and potential of new equipment

a1 7 Improve winter maintenance plans to consider reduce salt use in parks including examining which surfaces are treated removal of excess salt around buildings and guidance on labor practices and equipment

a1 8 Set and achieve maintenance and recreation staff training goals to achieve MPCA Level II Smart Salting Certification

a1 9 Expand public education regarding salt impacts on water bodies through the website social media posts bulletins programs and incentives

a1 10 Prioritize replacement of asphalt pavement in areas where pavement is actively eroding and drains directly into the storm sewer system

a1 11 Require that all new projects minimize impervious surfaces and reduce impervious surfaces when possible

a1 12 Require that all MPRB projects use on-site Best Management Practices [BMPs] to either decrease or not increase stormwater runoff

a1 13 Continue to work with community partners and agencies including (but not limited to) watershed districts the City of Minneapolis Public Works Department the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and neighboring cities to better address and manage the collective impacts of polluted stormwater runoff into lakes and creeks [from Chapter 2)

A2 Contribute to management of regional stormwater in the interest of regional water quality

a2 1 Implement regional stormwater facilities BMPs in parks in partnership with City of Minneapolis and watershed districts only where envisioned in park master plans

a2 2 Define roles and responsibilities for MPRB City of Minneapolis and watershed districts for management of stormwater facilities in parks and develop corresponding maintenance practices budget and repair schedule

a2 3 Create fund and implement a stormwater BMP inspection maintenance and repair plan for MPRB staff including a catalog of BMPs installed in parks

a2 4 Partner with the City of Minneapolis to implement best stormwater management practicesinfrastructure

a2 5 Identify and analyze impairments and form strategic partnerships between local and state agencies and park stakeholders to effect change as needed [from Chapter 2]

a2 6 Establish policies and practices to reduce adverse impacts on water bodies from specific pollutants [from Chapter 2]

2 4 Create a fund for BMP maintenance and repair [incorporated into 23]

A3 Reduce the amount of trash and sediment in water bodies

a31 Complete a trash impact study that identifies estimated volumes sources and solutions to meet target reductions at specific locations and in specific timeframes

a3 2 Further promote the Cityrsquos adopt-a-catch-basin program

a3 3 Install additional maintenance control devices such as SAFL Bafe and SAFL Snout at key stormwater outfalls in coordination with partners

a3 4 Expand public education regarding proper waste reduction and impacts on water bodies

a3 5 Work with City of Minneapolis and other agencies to remove sediment fans in water bodies

a3 6 Stabilize eroding streambanks and shorelines

a3 7 Create a fund to repair erosion in parks

a3 8 Eliminate single-use plastic items at park events and facilities

a3 9 Prohibit single-use plastic items at park events and by park users who need permits

A4 Reduce water quality impacts from pets and geese

a4 1 Develop a Bacteria Mitigation Strategy which addresses beach clean-up of goose feces

a4 2 Continue and expand public education about no feeding of waterfowl

a4 3 Continue and expand public education about dog waste collection and environmental impacts from dog waste

a4 4 Examine locations of trash cans relative to pathways and relocate add or remove cans where necessary

a4 5 Modify habitat to reduce food and preferred nesting areas and increase geesersquos sense of danger by reducing turf areas replacing grass with native plantings or materials leaving areas in grass to naturalize and stopping fertilizer use and watering to reduce young shoots

a4 6 Reduce geese sight lines and limit their access to open water by establishing long grasses shrubs or other tall dense plants along shorelines that are thick enough to discourage nesting and where needed create barriers using fences hedges and a continuous band of emergent aquatic plants at the shoreline

A5 Reduce impacts of point source pollution and pollutant spills on water bodies

a5 1 Expand spill kit distribution in MPRB vehicles

a5 2 Expand spill response material storage to at least one location per service area

a5 3 Conduct internal and external education regarding spill prevention and response

a5 4 Work with City of Minneapolis and other agency and research partners to identify and address point source pollution impacting parks and water bodies

a5 5 Create with City Emergency Services a coordinated plan for accidents including those caused by transit or industrial accidents affecting water bodies

A6 Respond to water quality realities

a6 1 Continue water quality monitoring based on water clarity chlorophyll-a and phosphorous and add other testing regimes as warranted

a6 2 Conduct water quality goal-setting sessions with internal staff and external partners

a6 3 Prepare lake management strategies for each MPRB-managed water body

a6 4 Continue partnerships with local and state agencies to remain aware of and address emerging contaminants

a6 5 As part of MPRB planning efforts evaluate flood risk using the City and Watershed Districtrsquos most up-to-date flood mapping in order to achieve sustainable use and anticipate and address potential impacts due to flooding [from Chapter 2]

a6 6 Continue the MPRB Lake Monitoring Program and use the Lake Aesthetic User and Recreation Index (LAURI) tool to communicate a recreational view of lake water quality

A7 Develop and implement a policy of creating and updating management plans for surface water within the parks [from Chapter 2]

a7 1 Assess current stormwater mitigation structure inspection protocols and maintenance operations to ensure that public investments are protected

a7 2 Set measurable targets to improve surface water quality at specific locations within the parks

a7 3 Define specific roles and responsibilities of different departments within MPRB the city and watershed organizations to address and mitigate stormwater runoff before it reaches lakes creeks and wetlands

a7 4 Evaluate stormwater outfalls within the parks to determine whether any pollution controls might be added to help protect surface waters from further impairment

B WATER BUILD RESILIENCY IN THE FACE OF CHANGING WATER LEVELS

B1 Design plan and manage park facilities in light of changing water levels

b1 1 Utilize projected future flood plain analysis during planning efforts

b1 2 Identify outfalls walls bridge abutments and other flood-threatened infrastructure during master planning efforts and develop proposed solutions in light of flooding projections

b1 3 Create planting plans for trees shrubs and other vegetation to address water quality concerns based on an understanding of projected water regime

b1 4 Design and naturalize lakeshores and streambanks to withstand projected future flooding

b1 5 Identify and map flood-prone recreational infrastructure especially trails and develop detour plans that can be implemented quickly and with clear public notification

B2 Continue and strengthen partnerships to address management of citywide stormwater infrastructure

b2 1 Partner with City of Minneapolis and watershed districts in the creation of to develop park master plans and participate in partner agency efforts such as flood studies

b2 2 Improve communication with partners and to the public about water management park impacts and other effects of increased precipitation

B3 Continue to work with partners to understand evaluate and help to address as appropriate elevated groundwater levels

B4 Expand public education to address water quality issues [from Chapter 2]

b4 1 Offer ongoing public awareness and education events about water quality concerns

b4 2 Raise public awareness of personal habits and choices that impact water in the parks including winter use of salt fertilizer for lawns and gardens feeding animals in the parks pet waste and leaf removal and proper use or disposal of grass clippings

b4 3 Use environmental education to address challenges in public perception of water quality including naturally occurring water-based plants as visual cues

C AIR CONTRIBUTE TO IMPROVING LOCAL AIR QUALITY AND REDUCING URBAN HEAT ISLAND

C1 Partner in regional heat island and air quality monitoring and studies [from Chapter 3]

c1 1 Analyze existing data reflecting tree canopy urban heat island air quality testing results land cover types and impervious surfaces to obtain a picture of mitigation opportunities within the parks

c1 2 Examine opportunities to increase tree canopy and reduce impervious surfaces in relation to other land covers to understand where best management practices might be used to gain the most benefits related to air quality

c1 3 Identify which areas within the park system are best suited to protection enhancement and restoration based on existing land covers mow frequency and the potential need for soil improvement

C2 Implement strategies to reduce urban-heat-island effect and address heat equity issues [from Chapter 3]

c2 1 Use information from regional heat island and air quality monitoring and studies to evaluate and prioritize future projects in collaboration with other considerations within this plan related to water habitat and general park use to determine the best possible locations

c2 2 Partner with the City of Minneapolis and other agencies to reduce urban-heat-island effect and address heat equity issues such as those recommended in the EPA Urban Heat Island Compendium

c2 3 Increase tree planting in areas identified as having high heat island or low air quality

C3 Reduce vehicle and equipment emissions

c3 1 Examine fleet-wide emissions and estimate emissions generated by park employees then set reduction goals

c3 2 Document and communicate options for hybrid and electric vehicles for all vehicle purchases

c3 3 Develop small equipment inventory that includes emissions information then work to transition small equipment fleet to alternative options such as electric or four-stroke

c3 4 Adopt Green Fleet procedures similar to City of Minneapolis fleet procedures including flex fuel protocols and idling standards

c3 5 Complete service centers master plan with consideration of siting to achieve more efficient travel management

c3 6 Develop transportation management plan and procedures for field staff that considers and optimizes travel time to and between parks and service centers in order to reduce overall vehicle miles and emissions

c3 7 Prioritize purchases of hybrid and electric vehicles and equipment for replacement and new purchases

c3 8 Develop and implement a plan (with a timeline) to transition to an all-electric fleet of vehicles and equipment for park operations

c3 9 Track vehicle use to determine if smaller more efficient trucks can be used as large equipment is phased out of the fleet [from Chapter 3]

C4 Reduce air pollution from park supplies and materials activities and events

c4 1 Use low-VOC or no-VOC materials (paints glues cleaning supplies etc) in buildings and in maintenance activities wherever possible

c4 2 Ensure maintenance of landscapes with fire does not coincide with air quality alert days

c4 3 Monitor air quality at wood processing facility and adopt a plan to reduce emissions

c4 4 Prohibit fireworks displays except an official MPRB-hosted display for Independence Day

13 Use low-VOC or no-VOC materials (paints glues cleaning supplies etc) in buildings and in maintenance activities wherever possible [incorporated into C4]

14 Ensure maintenance of landscapes with fire does not coincide with air quality alert days [incorporated into C4]

15 Monitor air quality at wood processing facility and adopt a plan to reduce emissions [incorporated into C4]

D AIR CONTRIBUTE TO CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION

D1 Reduce the agency-wide carbon footprint

d1 1 Complete a carbon footprint analysis including identification of areas of improvement and reduction strategies

d1 2 Establish carbon footprint reduction targets and tasks and report at least annually on progress

d1 3 Explore alternative energy purchasing programs to increase percentage of MPRB energy that is generated sustainably

D2 Advocate for and support carbon footprint reduction for park employees and visitors

d2 1 Promote transportation mode changes for MPRB staff and park visitors including remote work options shared EV pool vehicles bicycles scooters and transit

d2 2 Improve information technology to allow for more effective remote meetings

d2 3 Work with Metro Transit to evaluate and improve transit access to parks

d2 4 Improve park access points for multi-modal users including ensuring curb ramps are properly placed and designed

D3 Increase building efficiency

d3 1 Complete agency-wide energy audit and identify areas of improvement

d3 2 Design efficiency into buildings at time of construction or major improvements

d3 3 Perform energy efficiency improvements as part of general building and grounds maintenance including door and window sealing HVAC improvements lighting improvements enhanced insulation and others

D4 Explore alternative energy generation opportunities in parks

d4 1 Explore geothermal and solar generation in areas determined suitable for those energy sources when improving or constructing buildings or other site improvements

d4 2 Seek grants for additional solar andor geothermal installations

D5 Sequester carbon in the park system and urban forest

d5 1 Study the ability and potential of parkland and urban forest to sequester carbon and identify areas of improvement through landscape change (in partnership with natural areas management) and other practices

d5 2 Explore use of biochar under athletic fields and in soil modification projects

d5 3 Increase sequestration through improved landscape management practices including restoring and augmenting forests grasslands and wetlands with native plantings and reducing turf

d5 4 Increase tree canopy planting only native trees or North American trees migrating north on parklands and City-owned property managed by MPRB

d5 5 Continue and expand public education about the need to protect tree canopy throughout the city by watering street and boulevard trees [from Chapter 3]

E LAND MAINTAIN AND IMPROVE SOIL HEALTH

E1 Conduct soil contaminant testing in parks where urban agriculture areas have been designated in park master plans

E2 Utilize park development as a means of improving soil health with mitigation partners such as Hennepin County

E3 Address soil compaction during park construction and after events

e3 1 Conduct soil compaction tests at the inception of major projects and develop de-compaction strategies and extents

e3 2 Explore use of biochar in park projects especially athletic fields as a means of de-compacting soils

e3 3 Re-assess event fee structure to explore funding for decompaction of impacted parks

E4 Minimize erosion and its impacts

e4 1 Evaluate Minnesota Erosion Control Society best management practices for inclusion in standard construction project specifications

e4 2 Evaluate current erosion control construction specifications to address and avoid wildlife conflicts and concerns and develop and implement wildlife- friendly standards

e4 3 Complete slope analysis for mowing to determine best-fit equipment and modify mowing plans to assign specific equipment use to different slope types

e4 4 Identify erosion problem areas throughout the system and develop plans for minimizing and correcting areas that are prone to erosion

e4 5 Require that projects assess potential erosion and apply methods to preventmitigate erosion

F LAND IMPROVE ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE OF TURF MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

F1 Address environmental concerns around highly-managed turf

f1 1 Pursue staff training and certification specifically the Turf Management Certificate for Water

f1 2 Continue expansion of programmable higher efficiency irrigation controls especially at golf courses and premier sports fields

f1 3 Identify opportunities to incorporate USGA Golf Course greening practices

f1 4 Identify areas where turf is not serving a purpose (eg for sports or recreation) and replace with pollinator-friendly native plantings

f1 5 Develop and implement a plan to transition to pesticide-free maintenance of turf throughout the Park system including for golf courses and premier sports fields

f1 6 Explore additional methods to transition general park turf into lower mow areas or alternative land covers to further improve pollinator benefits as well as increase stormwater capture reduce erosion risk and add community-driven programs to park spaces [from Chapter 4]

f1 7 Initiate mandatory pre-season mower and trimmer training to address slope equipment suitability compaction grass clipping redirection and tree protection

f1 8 Develop standard procedures and protocols for vehicles driving on turf in order to limit compaction and damage

26 Initiate mandatory pre-season mower and trimmer training to address slope equipment suitability compaction grass clipping redirection and tree protection [incorporated into F1]

27 Develop standard procedures and protocols for vehicles driving on turf in order to limit compaction and damage [incorporated into F1]

G LAND REDUCE NEGATIVE CONSTRUCTION-RELATED IMPACTS

G1 Review and modify construction specifications and practices to increase environmental and wildlife protections

g1 1 Conduct mandatory pre-construction conferences to address environmentally and wildlife friendly construction requirements including materials selection and recycling

g1 2 Install and maintain wildlife friendly erosion control devices during construction

g1 3 Save and re-use site topsoil

g1 4 Require weather protection of stored materials

g1 5 Require that construction permits issued to other agencies include environmentally and wildlife friendly construction specifications similar to those used on MPRB projects

g1 6 Require construction scheduling and project timing to avoid spawning nesting migration and pollinator emergence

g1 7 Incorporate more sustainable and green building technology and materials into design guidelines

g1 8 Protect trees during park development and other development affecting trees on public land

g1 9 Train and monitor staff and contractors to minimize compaction and damage to park assets during construction

g1 10 When athletic fields are rested and restored with new turf use the opportunity to place biochar under the grass to help improve soil health stormwater capture and air quality [from Chapter 4]

29 Consider construction scheduling and project timing in the context of nesting migration and pollinator emergence [incorporated into G1]

30 Incorporate more sustainable and green building technology and materials into design guidelines [incorporated into G1]

31 Protect trees during park development and other development affecting trees on public land [incorporated into G1]

32 Train and monitor staff and contractors to minimize compaction and damage to park assets [incorporated into G1]

H LAND REDUCE HUMAN-CREATED NEGATIVE IMPACTS IN THE PARKS

H1 Reduce waste generated by and in parks

h1 1 Develop public awareness campaign and staff training about proper waste disposal

h1 2 Track diversion rates in park waste and set system-wide diversion goals including for MPRB-organized events

h1 3 Adopt waste policies consistent with City of Minneapolis Green to Go Ordinance and Zero Waster Plan

h1 4 Work with partners vendors and event organizers to ensure food and drink containers in parks are recyclable or compostable

h1 5 Implement ldquodeconstructionrdquo rather than demolition during park projects to extract high value materials require contractors to recycle materials as possible and track construction waste diversion

h1 6 Expand and improve signage to inform park visitors about allowed and prohibited activities in parks especially bird sanctuaries and other natural areas

h1 7 Eliminate single-use plastic items at park facilities and events

h1 8 Prohibit single-use plastic items at park events and by park users who need permits

H2 Reduce light pollution generated by park activities and facilities

h2 1 Implement International Dark Sky Association certified lighting

h2 2 Identify areas where existing lighting can be modified or eliminated to limit light spill-over especially into natural areas

h2 3 Provide staff training on light pollution effects on people wildlife and ecosystems dark skies and lighting impacts

h2 4 Assess street and parkway lights for impact on parks and natural areas then work with partners to redirect shield or remove fixtures

h2 5 Require that all park projects and funding requests follow Audubonrsquos Lights Out program guidelines International Dark Sky Association Lighting Basics standards and Minnesotarsquos B3 guidelines

H3 Reduce noise generated by park activities facilities and events [from Chapter 5]

h3 1 Require that all park machinery is operated in compliance with the Occupational Safety and Health Administrationrsquos permissible noise exposure limits

h3 2 Monitor all park events to ensure permissible noise exposure limits are not exceeded

I LIFE PROTECT AND ENHANCE HABITAT QUALITY IN PARKS

I1 Identify and preserve existing and potential habitat areas throughout the Park system

i1 1 Redesignate the nine remnant plant communities that are identified in the 2007-2020 Comp Plan (approved October 17 2007) as areas of continued ecological importance for preservation and enhancement

i1 2 Identify other remaining tracts of woodlands wetlands and prairie and protect these lands from development and ragmentation

i1 3 Inform operations maintenance and planning projects including citizen advisory committees and community engagement plans of the need to preserve and expand habitat

i1 4 Develop and update baseline data on wildlife in the parks including birds mammals amphibians reptiles insects fish and invertebrates using citizen science Bio Blitzes and other techniques

35 Develop and update baseline data on wildlife in the parks including birds mammals amphibians reptiles insects fish and invertebrates using citizen science Bio Blitzes and other techniques [incorporate into I1]

I2 Transition from turf-focused parks management to a mixture of turf and naturalized areas ultimately reducing total acreage of turf

i2 1 Develop maintenance guidelines for natural areas

i2 2 Develop staffing plans that will allow for an expansion of naturalized areas in the parks including possibility of additional adding ecologist positions park-keeper gardener-type positions devoted to naturalized areas and analysis of cost and staffing impact on organization

i2 3 Continue to work with local partners to restore and manage natural areas guided by park master plans and approved agreements

i2 4 Expand use of fescue and drought tolerant grasses including native plants

i2 5 Complete analysis of sites most suited to pollinator-friendly habitat lawns map their acreage over time and monitor success

i2 6 Reassess equipment suitability and mowing heights to protect bird bee and butterfly habitat

i2 7 Prepare prescriptive mowing plans that address height frequency timing and landscape slope in order to protect habitat

I3 Enhance management of natural and naturalized areas in parks

i3 1 Complete Natural Areas Management Plan

i3 2 Increase technology capability in the field to include definitions maps methods and standards of maintenance

i3 3 Map both formal and ad-hoc natural surface trails in the park system and identify those in need of improvement or closure to protect natural resources

i3 4 Increase interdepartmental coordination on plantings mowing sight lines and general landscape management planning

i3 5 Identify areas where standing or fallen dead wood can be left to enhance habitat

i3 6 Add ecologist positions to manage natural and naturalized areas in parks

i3 7 Follow guidelines published by the Xerces Society and leave fallen leaves in order to support insects pollinators and other wildlife [from Chapter 5]

I4 Develop an invasive species management strategy in keeping with IPM principles working with state local and academic partners advisory groups and volunteers

I5 Limit use of Eliminate pesticides and fertilizers and use only as a last resort if required by MN DNR

i5 1 Continue to reduce Eliminate pesticide and fertilizer applications based on research-based recommendations from partners and advisory groups

i5 2 Develop and maintain a non-lethal Pest Management Plan for facilities park assets consistent with revise and rename MPRBrsquos IPM program

I6 Organize and activate volunteers to enhance management of natural and naturalized areas throughout the Park system

i6 1 Identify current effective volunteer projects and activities (such as MPRB Park Stewards and the Legacy Volunteer program at the Eloise Butler Wildflower Garden and Bird Sanctuary (EBWG)

i6 2 Replicate and expand effective volunteer projects and activities

i6 3 Expand MPRB volunteer coordination staffcapabilities to promote volunteerism and train monitor and recognize volunteers

i6 4 Train front-line MPRB staff to coordinate with and support volunteer efforts

J LIFE INCREASE HABITAT CONNECTIVITY THROUGHOUT THE CITY

J1 Implement identified habitat corridors (see map)

j1 1 Prioritize planting of bird and pollinator-friendly native vegetation including street trees within identified corridors

j1 2 Work with public private and non-profit partners within identified corridors to implement habitat restoration and enhancement projects including blooming boulevards green alleys habitat enhancement on public lands etc

j1 3 Research track and report on plant life native trees and vegetation that will offer best pollinator habitat throughout the growing season working with state local and academic partners

j1 4 Develop and implement wildlife-friendly corridor standards policies and procedures (including ramps turtle tunnels curb cuts signed crossings fences seasonal signage wildlife-friendly erosion control netting etc)

j1 5 Continue to identify and implement ways to mitigate effects on wildlife corridors during MPRB planning and programming

J2 Implement wildlife protection strategies for major construction projects and at significant roadway crossings of corridors

j2 1 Identify sites with largest number of animal-roadway conflicts working with partner agencies as necessary and implement changes to reduce those conflicts

j2 2 Develop and implement wildlife-friendly construction and maintenance standards policies and procedures (including ramps turtle tunnels curb cuts signed crossings temporary fences seasonal signage wildlife-friendly erosion control netting etc)

j2 3 Implement wildlife-friendly construction and maintenance standards policies and procedures in partnership with the City of Minneapolis and Hennepin County as appropriate

j2 4 Require a wildlife impact assessment and management plan as part of planning and permitting for construction projects and road work

J3 Educate MPRB Commissioners and staff park visitors and the general public about wildlifersquos role in ecological function

j3 1 Educate people about wildlife as an essential component of a healthy ecosystem

j3 2 Install signage to identify and protect wildlife corridors and habitat

jJ3 3 Continue to develop and disseminate educational resources in the form of print map video or other media

K LIFE PROTECT MAINTAIN AND EXPAND URBAN FOREST

K1 Maintain and expand extents of the forest canopy

k1 1 Set specific and realistic goals for city-wide urban forest canopy coverage with input from the Minneapolis Tree Advisory Commission and share publicly in annual reports on progress made

k1 2 Improve integration of forestry with capital projects in parks to minimize tree removal and to capitalize on opportunities to increase urban canopy through post-project planting

k1 3 Identify areas where soil compaction around trees is an issue due to general use or events and develop implement remedies

k1 4 Expand pruning of young trees to ensure proper shaping and health as they mature

k1 5 Continue Update and rename pest monitoring and management programs in partnership with federal state and local agencies

k1 6 Continue to identify and implement ways to mitigate effects on the urban forest during planning and programming

K2 Increase urban forest diversity to make it more resilient to climate change and invasive pests

k2 1 Continue to partner with University of Minnesota to research and pilot new tree species in Minneapolis

k2 2 Increase number of tree species and reduce overall percentage of single species as replanting takes place

k2 3 Educate the public on what trees to plant based on future climate forecasts

k2 4 Plant only native trees or North American trees migrating north except when as a last resort in areas where a native or North American tree would not survive

k2 5 Prioritize the planting of trees that provide high ecological services (such as oaks) and stop planting trees from other continents that provide very low ecological services (such as gingko and Japanese tree lilacs)

L LIFE PROTECT AND ENHANCE AQUATIC HABITAT

L1 Protect lakes wetlands and waterways from aquatic invasive species

l1 1 Prepare an Aquatic Invasive Species Management Plan based on the Zebra Mussel Action Plan and Nokomis Carp Management Study

l1 2 Continue AIS prevention and early detection programs

l1 3 Update IPM to address aquatic plants

L2 Develop an Aquatic Plant Management Plan that addresses fish habitat

l2 1 Perform more frequent lake surveys as budget allows

l2 2 Evaluate efficacy and need of aeration systems at the end of each systemrsquos useful life

l2 3 Work in partnership with the City of Minneapolis Met Council Hennepin County and other agencies to maintain and enhance fish habitat

L3 Work with local regional and state partners to monitor and address issues with waterfowl and mosquitoes

l3 1 Plan and design structural BMPs so they are not breeding areas for mosquitoes per Metropolitan Mosquito Control District (MMCD) recommendations

l3 2 Create public information campaign about biological mosquito control

l3 3 Opt out of MMCD mosquito larvae treatments in bird sanctuaries and other natural areas throughout the Minneapolis park system

l3 4 Continue to identify and implement ways to mitigate effects on aquatic wildlife during planning and programming

M LIFE PROTECT BIRDS AND ENHANCE BIRD HABITAT

M1 Protect migratory and resident birds consistent with the goals of the US Fish and Wildlife Servicersquos Urban Bird Treaty program based on Audubon Minnesotarsquos Guide to Urban Bird Conservation for the Twin Cities and Surrounding Area

m1 1 Protect restore and enhance urban habitat for birds and require that park projects and activities do not reduce habitat for birds and other wildlife

m1 2 Improve bird habitat by requiring native trees shrubs and flowers in vegetation plans

m1 3 Transition to a pesticide-free Park system to reduce threats to birds and the insects that birds eat

m1 4 Opt out of MMCD mosquito larvae treatments in bird sanctuaries and other natural areas throughout the Minneapolis park system

m1 5 Prohibit fireworks displays except an official MPRB-hosted display on July 4

m1 6 Reduce hazards to birds including by requiring bird-safe glass and other building materials and lighting on all MPRB projects and fundinggrant requests

m1 7 Require a bird impact assessment and management plan for all projects and plans in the Park system

m1 8 Require that all new park facilities and projects comply with the Minnesota B3 guidelines

m1 9 Educate and engage citizens to care about birds and conserve their habitat through signage education programs and staff training

m1 10 Continue to identify and implement ways to mitigate effects on birds during MPRB planning and programming

N LIFE PROTECT WILDLIFE AND ENHANCE WILDLIFE HABITAT

N1 Prevent wildlife conflicts to reduce harm to wildlife

n1 1 Increase public education about wildlife with interpretive and educational signage in parks

n1 2 Expand educational programs for all age groups about the importance of wildlife and guidelines for observing and caring for wildlife

n1 3 Require that construction projects maintenance schedules and major recreational events be timed to avoid spawning nesting migration and pollinator emergence

n1 4 Require that all new park facilities and projects comply with the Minnesota B3 guidelines retrofit existing facilities whenever feasible

n1 5 Continue to identify and implement ways to mitigate effects on wildlife during MPRB planning and programming

N2 Co-exist with wildlife through humane wildlife management policies and practices

n2 1 Require that all MPRB staff and contractors prioritize humane non-lethal management methods for managing human-wildlife interactions and conflicts

n2 2 Adopt the as a framework underlying the specific mitigation methods

n2 3 Adopt and apply the Humane Society of the United Statesrsquo (HSUS) template

n2 4 Adopt and apply the HSUS template

n2 6 Adopt and apply the Humane Society of the United Statesrsquo template Management Plan for beavers

M REMAIN ACCOUNTABLE AND ADAPT WITH THE EVOLVING WORLD

O CONTINUE TO UPDATE TECHNOLOGY AND PLANS

O1 Create interactive map layers in GIS based on the maps included in this document and make them publicly available on the MPRB website

O2 Update this planrsquos implementation checklist and report at least annually to the MPRB Commissioners and general public

O3 Communicate and coordinate plan implementation responsibilities of all departments and divisions

O4 Update and modify this plan to account for evolving and emerging technologies every 5 three years

O5 Communicate to the public the increasing urgency of MPRBrsquos environmental goals and initiatives

MPRB ESP Proposed Revisions [renumbered] 30 May 2020

Packet Pg 78

Packet Pg 79

Packet Pg 80

Packet Pg 81

Packet Pg 82

Packet Pg 83

Packet Pg 84

Packet Pg 85

Packet Pg 86

Packet Pg 87

Packet Pg 88

Packet Pg 89

Packet Pg 90

Packet Pg 91

Packet Pg 92

Date June 15 2020 From Claire Ruebeck

Jocey Hale James Reid

Re Comments on the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board Ecological System Plan

Thank you for providing the chance to review the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board (MPRB) Ecological System Plan (ESP) The MPRB ESP is a robust document and reflects thoughtful and dedicated work We appreciate the opportunity to share feedback which is presented below by topic area WATER

bull A Elevate the goal to go beyond ldquoPrevent Degradation of Water Qualityrdquo to assertively ldquoImprove Water Qualityrdquo

bull A6 Respond to water quality realities o Issue and evaluate timely water reports

Monthly water testing and reports Post to online for public review Develop swimfish dashboard Annual MPRB Comprehensive Water Quality Report

httpswwwminneapolisparksorgwp-contentuploads2019012017-Water-Resources-Reportpdf

o Establish protocols for issuing public notificationsalerts for water risks o Identify degradation causes what would improve the situation what action to take (by

government organization individual) ndash create community knowledge and call to action AIR

bull C Establish goal and strategies for no net loss of trees aim for aggressive net tree canopy gain the Minneapolis tree canopy is declining coordinate with Minneapolis Tree Advisory Group for goals and timeline restoring tree canopy and reaching canopy coverage goal is an environmental justice initiative

bull E1 Prepare inventory of all contaminated parklands and prioritize mitigations complete Natural Areas Phase II report

bull F Turf Management ndash to reduce mowing requirements replace recreation lawns with native ground cover (clover low maintenance stoppable ground cover etc) allow native plants to grow wild where appropriate

bull G31 Modify master plans to protect trees and eliminate negative construction impacts

bull H Human-Created Negative Impacts ndash add goal and strategies to reduce noise pollution from machinery building equipment traffic transit etc

bull J40 Include water health as part of habitat corridors and connectivity

bull 421 Carefully evaluate when to utilize interpretive and educational signage in parks consider installation costs and maintenance evaluate smart phone options to direct and educate optimize opportunities to point to other park resources (ie identify direction and distance to other key features such as swim park Eloise Butler etc)

bull L2 Develop public dashboard to report on mercury levels in fish and eating advisory

bull Add goal to protect bird and other wildlife and develop associated strategies

Packet Pg 93

Re Comments on the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board Ecological System Plan - Continued

GENERAL

bull ESP Utilization o Incorporate the ESP by reference in the MPRB Community Engagement Plan requirements o Cross-reference to other key MPRB planning documents

Neighborhood Park Service Area Master Plans

bull Reconcile community approved design concepts to ESP there may be conflicts (tree removal etc)

Natural Areas Phase I and Phase II reports Regional Master Plans

bull Accountability o Establish timelines for implementing strategies and accomplishing goals o Define success for each strategygoal

bull Communications - provide regular updates via website e-blast e-newsletter (note it would be wonderful to have a regularly issued MPRB newsletter that compiles all project updates)

bull Technology ndash develop app(s) to promote and report on o SwimFish Minneapolis o Hike Minneapolis o Birdwatch Minneapolis o Volunteer opportunities

bull Funding - pursue collaborative researchimplementation grants related to ecological systems

Packet Pg 94

From Scott VreelandTo Arvidson Adam RSubject [External]Ecological Systems planDate Thursday May 14 2020 10828 PM

AdamI hope you and your family are doing well during these strange times I appreciate your work on the Ecological Systems Plan It is a good list of things we are doing and things we should be doing I am unclear about whether this is a call to action or will be relegated to a list of suggestions that might or might not take place among other priorities I donrsquot know much about the work on the comprehensive plan but maybe my concerns about guiding principles that hard wire science and data are better- or more powerfully built into a plan that directs all our decisions

I still am looking for systems and structures that help us make better choices and the Ecological Systems Plan does this The racial equity matrix was such a transformative way of looking at the decades of good intentions and battles of which district got the most resources- to a data driven system that is not determined by political patronage or who has the most votes

The High Performance Landscape Guidelines for NYC is a broader view of park principles than setting up ecological systems as a silo

I still find the writing of those underlying principles aspirational and inspirational I love how we can be transformed by our landscapes and for me how he park history and future is tied to a variety of landscapes

My desire to adopt landscape guidelines could be built into the revision of the comprehensive plan but I think the ecological plan doesnrsquot include enough about site context microclimates historic design intent creating parks that reveal a range of landscape types or how maintenance considerations should be a driver of planning Without an implementation plan for budget or staffing it will be an unused list of possible improvements

My other concern is more related to politics and bad science I am not sure how to inoculate against bad BMPrsquosI also think that while there has been much more social awareness about climate and pollinators we still need to be motivated by principles that are supported by science and data I think it is helpful to look to peer reviewed research to help guide our decisions I am an advocate of ecological restoration and reintroduction of site specific native plants and native plants in yards and gardens but in a highly disturbed urban landscape our plant choices need to be based on something more than what was once a native plant I have heard that we are depriving the ecosystem of food for insects by planting ginkgo trees instead of oaks so we should stop planting them (It you can turn the clock back far enough- I think they were once native to Minnesota)

I am also concerned about bad science and board decisions that do more harm than good because pseudo scientists whose claims about liquid biology replacing pesticides and miracle cures for ash borer infestations are believed by the gullible including some board members

Packet Pg 95

I like the work of Linda Chalker-Scott and her dedication to advice based on peer reviewed science The right plant in the right place is not always easy to conceptualize

While it is a fairly simple overview I find this slide show helpful about plant choices

httpswwwslidesharenetLindaCSnative-vs-nonnative-woody-plantsfbclid=IwAR2WzqWf3Ik0_B4moJau6VR1VhJ_7_jfbYPTm451GS7gmzLf4gKbHEnZp5s

ThanksScott Vreeland(612) 750- 8576

Principles of the NYC High Performance Landscape Guidelines

Restore and regenerate lost or damaged ecosystem services INCREASE DIvERSITY AND INTERCONNECTIvITY

Understand and preserve the complex relationships between soil water vegetation and fauna in each ecosystem

Strengthen the cityrsquos ecological functioning by increasing the diversity of park vegetation and habitat Create linkages between individual parks and natural areas that enhance larger-scale ecological functioning

ECONOMY

RESILIENCY

Work to maximize the economic ef ciency and productivity of all design construction and maintenance

Include maintenance considerations in all designs to assure that projects will thrive without extensive repair and modifications PERFORMANCE

Consider the long-term impact of material selection including source and production methods whether a material is recycled or recyclable

how the material can be maintained its carbon footprint and embedded energy and how long it will lastWork with maintenance staff to learn from past problems and increase serviceability

SOCIETY

COLLABORATION AND PARTICIPATION

Encourage direct and open communication and collaboration throughout the Parks Department and with other City agencies

Engage the public in a consultative process so that their knowledge of the site and recreational preferences are incorporated into the designAssist in the development of community stewardship

PUBLIC HEALTH

Design parks that encourage active recreation and improve the health and well-being of city residents EDUCATION

Design to inform the public about the critical ecological bene ts of parksTeach future generations about the importance of parks for the cityrsquos well-being

Packet Pg 96

Effect a transformation of social priorities about ecological and economic objectives

LONG-TERM THINkING

Provide future generations with a sustainable environment supported by regenerative systems

Avoid consumption of resources that contribute to habitat destruction and global warming

[External] This email originated from outside of the Minneapolis Park amp Recreation Board Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe

Packet Pg 97

THEME SUMMARYEcological System Plan

Public Comment Open 2142019

Public Comment Close 5122019

THEME ID THEME TOPIC AREA OF

COMMENTS

101Support for focus on areas near highways

impacted by VOCsair quality 1

201Suggestion for a faster timeline in reducing

vehicle fleet emissionscarbon emissions 1

202Suggestion to commit to a 100 zero emissions

fleetcarbon emissions 11

203Suggestion to use solar on park buildings for

their energy usecarbon emissions 1

204Support for being a leader fighting for climate

changecarbon emissions 1

301Concern regarding lack of connection between

wildlife and the ecosystemecology and habitat 1

Suggestion for a stronger commitment and

emphasis on the protection and enhancement

of natural areas and habitat

ecology and habitat 1

303 Suggestion for authentic nature centered design ecology and habitat 1

304Suggestion for native water or shoreline

plantingsecology and habitat 4

305Suggestion to add additional language related to

native trees and vegetationecology and habitat 2

306Suggestion to allocate funds towards ecological

monitoringecology and habitat 1

307 Suggestion to create a biodiversity plan ecology and habitat 1

308Suggestion to include habitat with native trees

and vegetation in all neighborhood parksecology and habitat 4

309Suggestion to stregthen the strategy around

habitat areas and qualityecology and habitat 1

Packet Pg 98

COMMENTS

310Suggestion to strengthen commitment to green

corridorsecology and habitat 1

311Support for improvements for native flora and

fauna including pollinatorsecology and habitat 4

312 Support for increased biodiversity in parks ecology and habitat 1

313 Support for increased habitat connectivity ecology and habitat 2

401Suggestion to include a greater emphasis on

public educationeducation 4

402 Support for environmental education in parks education 3

501Concern about the impacts of dogs and pets in

parkslandscape management 2

502Concern regarding lack of training around native

plant and bee lawn carelandscape management 1

503Concern regarding plants represented in Bee

Lawn Benefitslandscape management 1

504Concern regarding vehicle damage to parkland

in the springlandscape management 1

505Opposition to natural resource management

practiceslandscape management 1

506Suggestion for a specific implementation

timeline on turf reductionlandscape management 1

507Suggestion for more aggressive management of

invasive specieslandscape management 1

508Suggestion for more information on replacing

grass with native plantslandscape management 2

509Suggestion regarding language around natural

surface trailslandscape management 1

510 Suggestion to add native perrenials in all parks landscape management 2

511 Suggestion to add rain gardens in all parks landscape management 1

Packet Pg 99

COMMENTS

512Suggestion to ban certain lawn maintenance

practices by homeownerslandscape management 1

513 Suggestion to conserve land in its natural state landscape management 1

514Suggestion to create a native perennial buffer

around treeslandscape management 1

515Suggestion to develop additional invasive

species management planslandscape management 2

516Suggestion to emphasize specific erosion

techniques over otherslandscape management 1

517Suggestion to evaluate effectiveness of using

goats to control invasive specieslandscape management 1

Suggestion to focus on native trees and

vegetation and reduce or eliminate planting non-

native species

landscape management 7

519Suggestion to have a goal related to protection

of undeveloped park areaslandscape management 1

520Suggestion to include specific recommendations

related to native plantingslandscape management 2

521Suggestion to invest more in the Natural

Resource Management programlandscape management 1

522Suggestion to limit human access to high quality

habitat areaslandscape management 1

523Suggestion to maintain existing green space

rather than add additional amenitieslandscape management 1

524Suggestion to require no net loss of green space

from park projectslandscape management 1

Packet Pg 100

COMMENTS

525Suggestion to study native grasses to reduce

compactionlandscape management 1

526Support for acquisition of parkland along the

upper Mississippi riverfrontlandscape management 1

527 Support for biochar landscape management 3

528 Support for controlled (prairie) burns landscape management 1

529 Support for focus on environmental stewardship landscape management 1

530Support for mentioning urban agriculture in the

planlandscape management 1

531Support for protecting and expanding natural

areas to benefit humans and wildlifelandscape management 1

532 Support for reduced mowing in parks landscape management 2

533 Support for reduction of turf acreage landscape management 1

534 Support for use of perennials in lieu of annuals landscape management 1

601Suggestion to have stronger language around

light pollutionlight 3

602 Support for lighting recommendations light 1

701 Opposition to pesticide use in parks pesticides 4

702Suggestion for extremely limited use of

chemicals in the park systempesticides 1

703Suggestion to commit to not using neonicotinoid

pesticides in parkspesticides 1

704Suggestion to train staff on environmental

organic practicespesticides 1

Packet Pg 101

COMMENTS

705Support for policy change to IPM to to allow

chemical treatment of aquatic weedspesticides 1

801 Concern about tree loss due to park projects trees 1

Concern around tree loss due to increased

development and the resulting effects on urban

heat island

trees 1

803Concern regarding habitat loss from tree

removaltrees 1

804 Concern regarding impacts of mowing on trees trees 1

805 Concern regarding tree mix trees 1

806Suggestion to develop community tree planting

programtrees 1

807Suggestion to educate the public on what trees

to plant with future climatetrees 1

808Suggestion to encourage new tree plantings as

part of building projectstrees 1

809Suggestion to focus clean air and water efforts

on preserving trees and reforestationtrees 1

810 Suggestion to include canopy expansion trees 1

811 Suggestion to limit tree removal trees 5

812 Suggestion to plant only native trees trees 1

813Suggestion to require no net tree loss from park

projectstrees 2

814Suggestion to strengthen commitment to

standing deadwood as habitattrees 2

Packet Pg 102

COMMENTS

815Support for the recommendation to leave

standing dead trees for habitattrees 6

816Support for tree species diversity and future

tree mixtrees 1

901Concern regarding human impacts on water

qualitywater quality 1

902Concern regarding impacts on wildlife due to

poor water qualitywater quality 1

903Suggestion to add a recommendation to protect

and increase ponds and marsheswater quality 1

904Suggestion to add community gardens as a way

to mitigate stormwater runoffwater quality 1

905Suggestion to address stormwater outfalls

related to the Mississippi Riverwater quality 1

906Suggestion to locate dog parks away from

waterbodieswater quality 1

907Suggestion to require no net increase of

stormwater runoff from park projectswater quality 2

908Suggestion to stop stormwater runoff from

draining directly into the lakeswater quality 2

909 Support for clean air and water water quality 1

910Support for strategy to reduce trash in water

through filtering and public outreachwater quality 4

911Support for the use of more pervious pavers for

pathwayswater quality 1

Packet Pg 103

COMMENTS

1001Concern regarding lack of details related to

wildlife their habitat and protectionwildlife 3

1002Concern regarding natural resource

management impacts to wildlife habitatwildlife 1

1003Concern regarding no mention of protections

for migrating birds and the Mississippi Flywaywildlife 4

1004Concern regarding perception and treatment of

wildlife described in planwildlife 1

1005 Opposition to current management of wildlife wildlife 11

1006Suggestion for additional actions and activities

related to pollinatorswildlife 3

Suggestion to add additional areas of high

wildlife value that are protected from human

activity of high impact

wildlife 5

Suggestion to better coordinate high impact

activities in parks to not interfere with nesting a

migration seasons

wildlife 4

1009Suggestion to consider the impacts on wildlife of

MPRB planswildlife 1

1010Suggestion to educate the public on the values

of wildlifewildlife 1

1011Suggestion to emphasize MPRB wildlife and

their habitats as a prioritywildlife 1

1012Suggestion to enhance and expand wildlife

habitatwildlife 7

Suggestion to include more information and

protections for the Minneapolis Chain of

LakesTheodore Wirth Park IBA

wildlife 3

1014Suggestion to include wildlife impact

assessment for MPRB projectswildlife 6

Packet Pg 104

COMMENTS

1015Suggestion to keep protect and share space

with wildlifewildlife 3

1016Suggestion to minimize wildlife conflicts by

modifyinglimiting human activitywildlife 5

1017Suggestion to require all buildings and lighting to

be bird safewildlife 6

1018Suggestion to sustain and expand wildlife

habitat and biodiversitywildlife 1

1019Support for an ecologist position with a focus

towards wildlifewildlife 1

1020 Support for designing BMPs with wildlife in mind wildlife 1

1101Concern about advertisement of neighborhood

park planning

plan function layout and

engagement 1

1102Concern plan doesnt go far enough lacks

commitment and accountability

engagement 5

1103Concern plan misses the essence of concepts

core to ecological function

engagement 1

1104 Concern regarding implementation of planplan function layout and

engagement 1

1105Concern regarding organization of the Life

chapter

engagement 1

1106Concern regarding prioritization of recreation

over natural resources and wildlife

engagement 6

1107 Concern regarding the lack of detail in the planplan function layout and

engagement 2

1108Concern regarding the plans relationship with

park master plans

engagement 2

1109 Opposition to the plan plan function layout and

engagement 1

1110Suggestion for consistent labeling of goals in the

document

engagement 1

Packet Pg 105

COMMENTS

1111Suggestion for document language that shows a

greater commitment to implementation

engagement 1

1112 Suggestion for text clarificationsplan function layout and

engagement 3

1113Suggestion for text revision to other MPRB

statements and goals

engagement 2

1114Suggestion for text revision under Water and

engagement 1

1115 Suggestion regarding approach to planplan function layout and

engagement 1

1116Suggestion regarding plan implementation

communication

engagement 1

1117Suggestion to add more dog parks in

appropriate locations

engagement 1

1118 Suggestion to apply land goals to all parksplan function layout and

engagement 1

1119 Suggestion to collect and listen to public inputplan function layout and

engagement 1

Suggestion to complete natural resource

management plans during the park master

planning process

engagement 1

1121Suggestion to consider the relationships

between plan topic areas

engagement 1

1122Suggestion to coordinate across ecological and

park planning efforts

engagement 1

1123 Suggestion to get started implementing the planplan function layout and

engagement 1

Packet Pg 106

COMMENTS

1124 Suggestion to more broadly share the planplan function layout and

engagement 1

1125Suggestion to prioritize certain elements of the

engagement 6

1126Suggestion to set rules related to water

useconsumption

engagement 1

1127Suggestion to strengthen commitment to the

recommendation for a staff ecologist

engagement 1

1128Suggestion to tie goals with recommendations

in the Life chapter

engagement 1

1129 Support for goals in the life chapterplan function layout and

engagement 1

1130 Support for the planplan function layout and

engagement 5

Packet Pg 107

PUBLIC COMMENT LOGEcological

System Plan

support

Public Comment Open 2142019 opposition

Public Comment Close 5122019 concern

suggestion

DATE NAME METHOD SURVEY TOPIC AREA SENTIMENT COMMENT SUMMARY THEME THEME ID

3252019 Jeremy Bergerson survey 29 air quality support Appreciates the focus on areas of the city harmed by VOCs from the freewaySupport for focus on areas near

highways impacted by VOCs101

2212019 Barbara Norblom survey 18 carbon emissions suggestionEncouraged MPRB is looking into reduced vehicle fleet emissions however there

needs to be a more rigorous timeline

Suggestion for a faster timeline in

reducing vehicle fleet emissions201

2182019 Neil survey 4 carbon emissions suggestion

Plan should have stronger language and be more forward thinking (ex instead

of exploring policy and procedure changes resulting in reduced fleet emissions

write committing to a 100 zero-emissions feel in the near future

Minneapolis can be a leader in environmental change at a local level

Suggestion to commit to a 100 zero

emissions fleet202

2182019 Sam Benson survey 5 carbon emissions suggestion Strong commitment to move quickly to zero emissions vehicle fleetSuggestion to commit to a 100 zero

emissions fleet202

2182019 Mary heresa Downing survey 6 carbon emissions suggestionPlan on a 100 zero emissions fleet in the near future Takes a strong

commitment to continue the movement on clean energy use

emissions fleet202

2182019 Michelle survey 7 carbon emissions suggestion Commit to shifting to a 100 zero emissions fleetSuggestion to commit to a 100 zero

emissions fleet202

2182019 Evan Mulholland survey 9 carbon emissions suggestion100 electric vehicles Can do the work for less money and consistent with

Minneapolis plan for 100 renewable power

emissions fleet202

2182019 Maddie survey 10 carbon emissions suggestionStronger commitment to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by shifting to 100

zero-emissions fleet Shouldnt commit halfway with reducing fleet emissions

emissions fleet202

2182019 Rebecca K survey 11 carbon emissions suggestionConcerned about air quality in parks Would like to see commitment to 100

zero-emissions vehicles in the next decade

emissions fleet202

2182019 Margaret Sweeney survey 13 carbon emissions suggestionCommit to shifting to a 100 zero emissions fleet by 2025 While ambitions its

achievable and imperative for future health and well-being

emissions fleet202

2182019 Cora survey 14 carbon emissions suggestion Commit to shifting to 100 zero emissions fleetSuggestion to commit to a 100 zero

emissions fleet202

Packet Pg 108

System Plan

support

suggestion

2192019 Mary Ludington survey 16 carbon emissions suggestionAppreciate exploring policy and procedure changes but consider committing to

transitioning to an all electric fleet

emissions fleet202

2222019 Julia Rice survey 19 carbon emissions suggestionCurrent language regarding reduction in vehicle fleet emissions doesnt go far

enough Commit to shifting to a 100 zero emissions fleet

emissions fleet202

2182019 Michelle survey 7 carbon emissions suggestion Use solar on park buildings for their energy needsSuggestion to use solar on park

buildings for their energy use203

2182019 Maddie survey 10 carbon emissions supportContinue to be a leader in fight against climate change Its part of your

governmental responsibility

Support for being a leader fighting for

climate change204

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34 ecology and habitat

The plan misses the interconnectedness of Life and importance of wildlife to a

healthy ecosystem Focus seems to be management of wildlife so humans can

recreate

Concern regarding lack of connection

between wildlife and the ecosystem301

592019Friends of Roberts

Bird Sanctuaryletter na ecology and habitat suggestion

Rather than including this negative statement However there are often

competing interests in wildlife protection and human recreational activities

shared spaces mean compromises happen on both sides (pg 73) there should

be language committing to protecting and expanding habitat for wildlife in the

system The protection and enhancement of natural areas and an increase in

the amount of natural habitat needs to be emphasized throughout the

document

Suggestion for a stronger

commitment and emphasis on the

protection and enhancement of

natural areas and habitat

5112019 Leslie survey 47 ecology and habitat suggestionNature centered design promotes the health of humans and wildlife but that

design needs to be authentic

Suggestion for authentic nature

centered design303

Add an additional recommendation after 28 that states Increase vegetated

areas along the shorelines of lakes and streams with native plants

Suggestion for native water or

shoreline plantings304

362019 Brian Crotteau survey 21 ecology and habitat suggestion More needs to be done to restore native plants to lakes and shorelineSuggestion for native water or

362019 Brian Crotteau survey 22 ecology and habitat

Lakeshores need to be mostly unmowed areas with native plants trees and

grasses There need to be designated non-mowed areas along the lakes This

must be a priority

Packet Pg 109

System Plan

support

suggestion

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34 ecology and habitat suggestionWith regard to 171 There should be greater emphasis on using native water

plants or shoreline plants

increasing the presence of native trees shrubs and forbs and a reduction of non-

native species needs to be emphasized throughout the document

Suggestion to add additional language

related to native trees and vegetation305

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34 ecology and habitat suggestion

The plan misses importance of native trees and vegetation to sustain insect

populations and birds Strengthen the language around the utilization of native

plants as part of the development of a planting policy in policy section and

incorporate into the procedure section (pg 42)

442019 Doug survey 31 ecology and habitat suggestion

Natural resource management should be a priority in the following ways 2

Funds should be allocated to conduct ecological monitoring which could also

expand to invasive plants and wildlife surveys

Suggestion to allocate funds towards

ecological monitoring306

Add 417 Prepare a park plan including concrete steps to maintain and increase

biodiversity including protections for pollinators birds and other wildlife

Suggestion to create a biodiversity

plan307

4202019Kay Hansen Friends of

Minneapolis Wildlifesurvey 36 ecology and habitat suggestion Include habitat areas with native trees and vegetation in all neighborhood parks

Suggestion to include habitat with

native trees and vegetation in all

neighborhood parks

5102019 Rachel Augusta survey 46 ecology and habitat suggestion Include habitat areas with native trees and vegetation in all neighborhood parks

neighborhood parks

5112019 Leslie survey 47 ecology and habitat suggestionInclude habitat areas with native trees and vegetation in all neighborhood parks

Native wildlife need native vegetation

neighborhood parks

5132019 Carmine Profant survey 49 ecology and habitat suggestion Include habitat areas with native trees and vegetation in all neighborhood parks

neighborhood parks

Make this statement Plan to include habitat areas in all parks and provision for

protection and maintenance more concrete with language to the effect of

Reserve new and existing areas of natural habitat for experience with nature

and not for forms of recreation that can have a negative impact on the habitat

Suggestion to stregthen the strategy

around habitat areas and quality309

Packet Pg 110

System Plan

support

suggestion

491 is an excellent recommendation but should be strengthened to Protect

and expand on green corridors that enable wildlife and pollinator connections

Suggestion to strengthen

commitment to green corridors310

2272019 Monika survey 20 ecology and habitat support Love adding more pollinator habitat with a robust native focused gardenSupport for improvements for native

flora and fauna including pollinators311

362019 Brian Crotteau survey 22 ecology and habitat suggestionParks should be pollinator havens Pollinators are facing extinction and parks

need to recognize this then do something about it

Support for improvements for native

3232019 Beth survey 27 ecology and habitat supportImpressed with the work the park system is doing to improve the environment

for native animals plants and wildlife

3302019 Timothyjlamb survey 30 ecology and habitat supportProtecting and enhancing the flora and fauna of the park system will improve

the quality of life for all

2142019 Lila M Smith survey 1 ecology and habitat supportAll parks would benefit from the addition of biodiversity Most parks would

benefit and should have more native plants rain gardens and bee lawns

Support for increased biodiversity in

parks312

2142019 Lila M Smith survey 1 ecology and habitat supportAll parks would benefit from the addition of habitat connectivity Most parks

would benefit and should have more native plants rain gardens and bee lawns

Support for increased habitat

connectivity313

2272019 Monika survey 20 ecology and habitat supportThrilled habitat connectivity is a priority Excited by discussion around options to

mitigate impact of roads for turtles and frogs

connectivity 313

3112019 Ginny Halloran survey 24 education suggestionWould like to see public education emphasized as an area of responsibility of the

park system Theres a lot that you can teach us

Suggestion to include a greater

emphasis on public education401

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34 education suggestion

MPRB is missing an opportunity to educate residents and park visitors about

ecology and the need to limit recreation in some areas Peoples expectations

need to be reset in order to preserve and enhance ecological function

Minneapolis Wildlifesurvey 36 education suggestion

MPRB should commit to educating residents and park visitors about ecology and

the need to limit recreation in some areas Peoples expectations need to be

reset in order to preserve and enhance ecological function

582019 Jaden Hansen survey 40 education suggestion Put up signs to educate people about the wildlife and plants in the parksSuggestion to include a greater

Packet Pg 111

System Plan

support

suggestion

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34 education Educate the public on value and need for wildlife for healthy ecosystems Support for environmental education

in parks402

Educate the public about the value and inherent rights of all types of wildlife

and the need for wildlife to ensure healthy ecosystems

Support for environmental education

in parks402

582019 Jaden Hansen survey 40 education support

Create curriculum to share with youth camps and schools related to ecosystems

at work in the parks ex the water is different this year because a beaver put its

dam in this section and this is how all the plants are effected around it

in parks402

3302019 Timothyjlamb survey 30landscape

managementconcern

Supervision of the canine population needs immediate attention Owners let

their dogs run off leash and destroy flora and fauna

Concern about the impacts of dogs

and pets in parks501

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34landscape

managementconcern

A very active promotion should be launched to identify pets that are and are not

allowed into parks giving explicit reasons why

2142019 Lila M Smith survey 1landscape

managementconcern

There wasnt information in the plan about training grounds crews on caring for

native plants and bee lawns

Concern regarding lack of training

around native plant and bee lawn

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34landscape

managementconcern

Concern regarding the plants mentioned in the Bee Lawn Benefits cases study

Creeping thyme is not native Self-heal can be very invasive and hard to get ride

of calico aster is too tall to be classified as a turf vegetation

Concern regarding plants represented

in Bee Lawn Benefits503

3242019 john klein survey 28landscape

managementconcern Work vehicles do a lot of damage in the spring that doesnt get repaired

Concern regarding vehicle damage to

parkland in the spring504

582019 Jaden Hansen survey 40landscape

managementopposition

Wildness needs to be allowed to flourish and something youth learn to

appreciate and live with Conquering nature is what our nation has done and

were now on the brink of losing bees and contributors to biodiversity To

eradicate control decrease any of these is radically out of sync with who we

need to be as a community We know better than to use pesticides round up

animals and remove native plants

Opposition to natural resource

management practices505

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34landscape

managementsuggestion

Reduce mowed turf by 10 across all MPRB properties and replace with no

maintenance native plants annually for the next 5 years - add to air goals and

strategies (on page 42) add to 2511 add to turf management section

Suggestion for a specific

implementation timeline on turf

reduction

Packet Pg 112

System Plan

support

suggestion

362019 Brian Crotteau survey 22landscape

The Park Board should be more aggressive in eradicating invasives from the

parks More needs to be done to get rid of milfoil and other invasives

Suggestion for more aggressive

management of invasive species507

2152019 - survey 3landscape

managementsuggestion would like more on native plantings replace grass areas

Suggestion for more information on

replacing grass with native plants508

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34landscape

The plan should acknowledge challenges of restoring ecosystems and make

concrete commitments to rise to the challenge MPRB has the means to make

repairs and implement practices to improve water quality even if those

practices require partnership with other agencies

4192019 TWP survey 35landscape

management

Regarding 411 Concerns around possible ulterior motives of those who may be

determining which trails are environmentally degrading All sustainable natural

surface trails are currently mapped Trails not constructed specifically as natural

surface trails are rouge trails Theres a difference between what MPRB

considers to be a natural surface trail and a rouge trail Suggested rewrite of

recommendation Increase technology capability in field to include definitions

maps methods and standards for how natural areas are kept Map all natural

surface trails and rouge trails in the park system Assess which rouge trails meet

recreational user needs and which should be closed to prevent environmental

degradation

Suggestion regarding language around

natural surface trails509

managementsuggestion Add native perennials in all parks

Suggestion to add native perrenials in

all parks510

managementsuggestion Each park should have multiple pollinator gardens

all parks510

managementsuggestion Add rain gardens in all parks

Suggestion to add rain gardens in all

parks511

Homeowners spraying chemicals using fertilizer and raking leaves into streets

should be banned

Suggestion to ban certain lawn

maintenance practices by

homeowners

4102019 Dr Mary Harlow survey 33landscape

While theres a great increase in development its important in the long term to

conserve the land in a natural state

Suggestion to conserve land in its

natural state513

Packet Pg 113

System Plan

support

suggestion

Suggestion to add native perennials around the base of trees rather than

proposed grass buffers

Suggestion to create a native

perennial buffer around trees514

3232019 Beth survey 27landscape

Would like to see a management plan for the Japanese beetle Not effective on a

homeowner scale but might be on a citywide scale

Suggestion to develop additional

invasive species management plans515

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34landscape

Add an additional recommendation after 181 that states Develop

management plans for known invasive species not yet in the area

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34landscape

With regard to 141 Greater emphasis should be put on bioengineering versus

rip rap wall replacement

Suggestion to emphasize specific

erosion techniques over others516

442019 Doug survey 31landscape

Natural resource management should be a priority in the following ways 3 Goat

use for invasive plant control should be evaluated for its effectiveness versus

potential harm to native plantstrees

Suggestion to evaluate effectiveness

of using goats to control invasive

species

Bird Sanctuaryletter na

landscape

While theres an increase in species diversity and attention to climate change

the MPRB should be explicit that the focus is not on promoting diversity but

rather sustaining and expanding biodiversity in the park system Since non-

native plants dont contribute sufficiently to biodiversity there should be an

increased proportion of native trees and shrubs while limiting non-natives Add

a 312 with something to the effect of Focus the MPRB planting and education

practices to feature native tree species reducing or eliminating the use of non-

native species especially in natural areas Add to Land goals and strategies G -

improve habitat quality in the parks plantings will consist of native trees

shrubs and forbs

Suggestion to focus on native trees

and vegetation and reduce or

eliminate planting non-native species

4102019 Ed McFadden survey 32landscape

managementsuggestion Plant more native trees and vegetation

Packet Pg 114

System Plan

support

suggestion

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34landscape

Reduceeliminate planting of non-native trees shrubs and forbs in favor of

native vegetation Use native trees to replace tree canopy and eliminate non-

native tree plantings where natives and climate adaptive trees can survive -

include note about native trees in 311 add 312 Use native plants in planting

plans to encourage species diversity and maintain largest possible growing

native trees in available growing space

Minneapolis Wildlifesurvey 36

landscape

Increase native trees (or adaptive trees migrating north due to climate change)

and tree canopy and eliminate non-native tree

plantings where native or climate-change adaptive trees can survive

native vegetation

5102019 Rachel Augusta survey 46landscape

native vegetation

5112019 Leslie survey 47landscape

native vegetation

5132019 Carmine Profant survey 49landscape

Plant only trees native to Minnesota (or adaptive trees migrating north due to

climate change) and increase the tree canopy and eliminate non-native tree

native vegetation

landscape

managementsuggestion Add a life goal to Protect undeveloped areas within the park system

Suggestion to have a goal related to

protection of undeveloped park areas519

landscape

Chapter 6 doesnt mention native plants at all There should be consistent

support of planting native species and reducing the extent of non-native plants

Suggestion to include specific

recommendations related to native

plantings

Packet Pg 115

System Plan

support

suggestion

Ecosystems in the parks need to be restored Not just removing invasives and

having many acres of turf grass Default planting of new plants and trees should

be natives first

plantings

MPRB should significantly increase support and funding for the Natural Resource

Management Program The MPRB natural areas need more investment

Suggestion to invest more in the

Natural Resource Management

program

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34landscape

A plan to limit access to portions of parks should be implemented so they arent

loved to death and allow for the coexistence of other life forms - add this

statement in the beginning paragraph of the Life chapter Reduce access to

areas of parks with high negative impacts by humans or reduce sponsored

activities

Suggestion to limit human access to

high quality habitat areas522

Keep parks as green spaces of natural beauty and respite from the concrete and

traffic filled city Focus on maintaining parks rather than adding new amenities

we dont need or want We need to consult experts in various fields to get their

wisdom and experience for future development in and around parks

Suggestion to maintain existing green

space rather than add additional

amenities

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34landscape

managementRequire no net loss of green space from park projects

Suggestion to require no net loss of

green space from park projects524

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34landscape

managementsuggestion Study use of native grasses with very deep roots to reduce compaction

Suggestion to study native grasses to

reduce compaction525

managementsupport Would love to see an increase in parkland along the upper Mississippi river

Support for acquisition of parkland

along the upper Mississippi riverfront526

4182019

Erin Niehoff Chair of

Community

Environmental

Advisory Commission

(CEAC)

letter nalandscape

managementsupport Appreciate the consideration the use of biochar Support for biochar 527

landscape

managementsupport using biochar is an excellent idea Support for biochar 527

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34landscape

managementsupport biochar - great idea Support for biochar 527

Packet Pg 116

System Plan

support

suggestion

managementsupport Use controlled burns to simulate pre-development conditions where possible Support for controlled (prairie) burns 528

3252019 Jeremy Bergerson survey 29landscape

managementsupport

Happy MPRB is focusing on its role as an ecological steward rather where theyre

a logical play rather than transportation where they should defer to the City

Support for focus on environmental

stewardship529

3112019 Ginny Halloran survey 24landscape

managementsupport

Didnt see any mention of urban agriculture Would be nice to have food

growing within the park system There are many spots for this that can bring

community together and teach the importance of composting and good soil

Support for mentioning urban

agriculture in the plan530

managementsupport

Protect enhance and expand natural areas for the benefit of birds animals and

humans

Support for protecting and expanding

natural areas to benefit humans and

wildlife

landscape

managementsupport

Add a recommendation to establish a plan to reduce the extent of mowed areas

within the park system Support for reduced mowing in parks 532

2272019 Monika survey 20landscape

managementconcern Stop mowing so much Where are any prairies Support for reduced mowing in parks 532

managementsupport Theres too much turf grass and mowed areas Support for reduction of turf acreage 533

managementsupport Annuals are wasteful support switching to native perennials

Support for use of perennials in lieu of

annuals534

Bird Sanctuaryletter na light suggestion

Add something explicit to the life goals and recommendations at the end of this

chapter such as Reduce light pollution in the parks and support reduction in

light pollution throughout the City

Suggestion to have stronger language

around light pollution601

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34 light suggestion

Change Research standards for LED lights adopt where feasiblein budget to

Adopt Dark Sky research standards for LED lights adopt where feasiblein

budget

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34 light suggestionReplace explore with install in recommendation 551 and Replace explore with

review in recommendation 552

3202019 Paul survey 25 light support

Applaud recommendations related to lighting Light pollution Is an unnecessary

waster of money and energy and is an ecological threat Urge the creation of

sensible and intelligent lighting policy See the work done by the international

Dark-Sky Association

Support for lighting recommendations 602

Packet Pg 117

System Plan

support

suggestion

2142019 Kathie Noga survey 2 pesticides opposition

Get pesticides out of parks Do what is morally right for those with sensitivities

allergies and asthma Parks exclude because of the terrible health effects of

pesticides

Opposition to pesticide use in parks 701

Would like to see a commitment to get rid of pesticides in parks As a chemically

sensitive person who suffers from allergies and asthma there are some parts of

parks I cannot use due to pesticide use Listen to the public and do something

we can all be proud of by getting rid of pesticides

582019 Sigrid survey 42 pesticides opposition Stop the use of hazardous chemicals such as Round-up Opposition to pesticide use in parks 701

592019 kelly survey 44 pesticides opposition Please keep wildlife and protect it This means no pesticide use Opposition to pesticide use in parks 701

5132019 Carmine Profant survey 49 pesticides suggestionUrge MPRB to make the park system friendly to wildlife with extremely limited

use of chemicals

Suggestion for extremely limited use

of chemicals in the park system702

4182019

Community

Environmental

Advisory Commission

(CEAC)

letter na pesticides suggestionAdd a commitment to refrain from using neonicotinoid-based pesticides

anywhere with the park system

Suggestion to commit to not using

neonicotinoid pesticides in parks703

2142019 Lila M Smith survey 1 pesticides support Train crews to understand environmental organic practicesSuggestion to train staff on

environmental organic practices704

4172019Sally Guillet LHEC

representativeemail na pesticides support

Support the change to the Integrated Pest Management Policy to address

aquatic weeds which would allow for chemical treatment for eradication with

approval and supervision of the DNR

Support for policy change to IPM to to

allow chemical treatment of aquatic

Packet Pg 118

System Plan

support

suggestion

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34 trees concern

Human diversity is promoted not bio-diversity Plan erroneously states Tree

removal is typically limited to instances of tree death public safety hazards or

pest pressure The fact is many health and mature trees are removed during

park projects despite objections and then are not replaced despite requirements

to do so

Concern about tree loss due to park

projects801

542019 Leslie survey 37 trees concern

Concerns around urban heat island effect and tree loss due to disease and

invasive species The city cant afford to lose trees The proposed upzoning of

2040 will likely result in more tree loss

Concern around tree loss due to

increased development and the

resulting effects on urban heat island

3242019 john klein survey 28 trees concern Theres a lot of habitat loss by overly zealous tree removal workConcern regarding habitat loss from

tree removal803

3242019 john klein survey 28 trees support Theres substantial damage to our local trees from careless mowingConcern regarding impacts of mowing

on trees804

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34 trees concern Why arent there conifers in your tree mix Concern regarding tree mix 805

2182019 Mary heresa Downing survey 6 trees suggestionCreate a tree planting program to increase the number of trees in the city which

could offset the projected poor air quality and high temperatures

Suggestion to develop community

tree planting program806

2182019 Mary heresa Downing survey 6 trees suggestionEducate citizens and suppliers about what trees are most likely to thrive in a

warmer climate than we have now

Suggestion to educate the public on

what trees to plant with future

climate

542019 Leslie survey 37 trees suggestionWe need to conserve as much green space as possible Could there be a way to

encourage new builds to include trees

Suggestion to encourage new tree

plantings as part of building projects808

2192019 Susu Jeffrey survey 15 trees suggestion

The cheapest and most effective way to clean airwater is to preserve trees and

reforest Clean cars and technology may be appealing but tree planting is best

especially if we begin immediately

Suggestion to focus clean air and

water efforts on preserving trees and

reforestation

3252019 Jeremy Bergerson survey 29 trees suggestionDisappointed the plan only calls for canopy maintenance rather than expansion

Please consider how we can add as many trees as possible to the city

Suggestion to include canopy

expansion810

Bird Sanctuaryletter na trees

In the goals below and in chapter 6 there should be an explicit commitment to

limiting the removal of treesSuggestion to limit tree removal 811

Packet Pg 119

System Plan

support

suggestion

Minneapolis Wildlifesurvey 36 trees suggestion

Limit tree removal to instances of tree death public safety hazards or pest

pressure on parklands that are not considered natural

Suggestion to limit tree removal 811

5102019 Rachel Augusta survey 46 trees suggestion

5112019 Leslie survey 47 trees suggestion

5132019 Carmine Profant survey 49 trees suggestion

362019 Brian Crotteau survey 22 trees suggestion

When trees are taken down they should be replaced with native trees not

anything else Non natives directly contribute to extinction of birds insects and

pollinators

Suggestion to plant only native trees 812

Bird Sanctuaryletter na trees suggestion

Add to Land goals and strategies G - improve habitat quality in the parks

Require no net loss of trees from park projects

Suggestion to require no net tree loss

from park projects813

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34 trees Require no net loss of trees from park projectsSuggestion to require no net tree loss

471 should be strengthened and supplemented to the following Identify areas

where standing deadwood should be left for wildlife and pollinator habitat

Implement this approach in all natural areas in the park system Then add 472

Identify areas where fallen deadwood might be used for seating

commitment to standing deadwood

as habitat

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34 trees suggestionDead trees as habitat needs to be emphasized throughout the document Its

important for native birds and other animals

as habitat

Bird Sanctuaryletter na trees suggestion In natural areas the number of dead trees to be removed should be limited

Support for the recommendation to

leave standing dead trees for habitat815

Packet Pg 120

System Plan

support

suggestion

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34 trees supportInclude leaving dead trees standing that arent considered hazardous Support

for recommendation 471 In natural areas leave dead trees as wildlife habitat

Minneapolis Wildlifesurvey 36 trees suggestion In natural areas leave dead trees as wildlife habitat

5102019 Rachel Augusta survey 46 trees suggestion In natural areas leave dead trees as wildlife habitatSupport for the recommendation to

5112019 Leslie survey 47 trees suggestion In natural areas leave dead trees as wildlife habitatSupport for the recommendation to

5132019 Carmine Profant survey 49 trees suggestion In natural areas leave dead trees as wildlife habitatSupport for the recommendation to

Bird Sanctuaryletter na trees support

Encouraging to see plans to increase species diversity and good attention to

climate change in the future tree mix

Support for tree species diversity and

future tree mix816

362019 Brian Crotteau survey 21 water quality concernDog poop trash and homeowners draining swimming pools directly into the

lake impair the waters

Concern regarding human impacts on

water quality901

582019 Sigrid survey 42 water quality concern

Wildlife is a precious resource and must be protected and nurtured so it can be

maintained for years to come The water in the ponds is polluted and effecting

the health of fowl and fish Algae blooms and spreads throughout the whole

season

Concern regarding impacts on wildlife

due to poor water quality902

Bird Sanctuaryletter na water quality suggestion

Add an additional recommendation after 17 that states Protect and expand

wetland and marsh areas that provide filtration of stormwater runoff Add an

additional recommendation after 58 that states Protect and increase the

existence of ponds and marshes for their ability to remove nutrients from lakes

and streams

Suggestion to add a recommendation

to protect and increase ponds and

marshes

4182019

Community

Environmental

Advisory Commission

(CEAC)

letter na water quality suggestion Add community gardens to the list of was decrease runoff

Suggestion to add community gardens

as a way to mitigate stormwater

runoff

Packet Pg 121

System Plan

support

suggestion

2152019 - survey 3 water quality suggestionWould like more on how stormwater outfalls can be addressed to filter water

before entering the Mississippi River

Suggestion to address stormwater

outfalls related to the Mississippi

5112019 Leslie survey 47 water quality suggestionDont locate dog parks near waterbodies because the Mississippi River doesnt

need more pet waste in it

Suggestion to locate dog parks away

from waterbodies906

Require park projects to result in no net increase in stormwater runoff - add

somewhere under Water and Life (pg 74) Add to Land goals and strategies G -

improve habitat quality in the parks Require no net loss of green space from

park projects

Suggestion to require no net increase

of stormwater runoff from park

projects

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34 water quality Require no net increase in stormwater runoff from park projects

projects

362019 Brian Crotteau survey 21 water quality suggestion Stormwater runoff draining directly into the lakes needs to endSuggestion to stop stormwater runoff

from draining directly into the lakes908

362019 Brian Crotteau survey 22 water quality suggestion stop direct stormwater runoff into lakesSuggestion to stop stormwater runoff

2192019 Jessica Wardlaw survey 17 water quality support Air is vital to health and human survival Everyone deserves clean air and water Support for clean air and water 909

Minneapolis Wildlifesurvey 36 water quality support

prevent flow of trash into waterways - threatens water quality wildlife safety

and habitat

Support for strategy to reduce trash in

water through filtering and public

outreach

5102019 Rachel Augusta survey 46 water quality supportprevent flow of trash into waterways - threatens water quality wildlife safety

and habitat

outreach

5112019 Leslie survey 47 water quality supportprevent flow of trash into waterways - threatens water quality wildlife safety

and habitat

outreach

5132019 Carmine Profant survey 49 water quality supportprevent flow of trash into waterways - threatens water quality wildlife safety

and habitat

outreach

Packet Pg 122

System Plan

support

suggestion

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34 water quality supportStudy the use of permeable pavers on pathways (see page 61 for where to

include this note)

Support for the use of more pervious

pavers for pathways911

582019 Maggie OConnor survey 43 wildlife concern Goals dont address the details of how they will be met related to wildlife

Concern regarding lack of details

related to wildlife their habitat and

protection

5112019 Leslie survey 47 wildlife concern

Overall the plan doesnt create an authentic space for wildlife in any parks or

areas managed by MPRB We must do more in the era of rapidly diminishing

wildlife habitat and intense human development

protection

5122019 Constance Pepin survey 48 wildlife concern

There arent any concrete steps to protect vs manage wildlife in the plan

including migratory birds Animals have as much a right to spaces as humans yet

humans continue to reduce habitat and displace animals for recreation Plan

seems to continue outdated policies and practices rather than present new

policies to protect wildlife Plan fails to acknowledge the necessity of protecting

wildlife and provide concrete actions to preserve and enhance ecological

function through the park system Without wildlife ecological function cant be

sustained

protection

582019 Maggie OConnor survey 43 wildlife concern

A couple years ago there was a plan at Loring to eliminate the invasive cattails

which my readings suggests has been deemed almost impossible by the DNR

The work done has decimated the red-wing blackbird population and increased

algal blooms

Concern regarding natural resource

management impacts to wildlife

habitat

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34 wildlife concernLittle mention is made of the Mississippi Flyway and need to protect migrating

birds travelling through Minneapolis

Concern regarding no mention of

protections for migrating birds and

the Mississippi Flyway

Minneapolis Wildlifesurvey 36 wildlife concern

Plan doesnt ensure protections for millions of migrating birds who use the

Mississippi Flyway twice a year even though most river shoreland is managed by

5102019 Rachel Augusta survey 46 wildlife concern

Packet Pg 123

System Plan

support

suggestion

5132019 Carmine Profant survey 49 wildlife concern

Plan fails to correct the mindset that wildlife are an inconvenience to be

managed Animals are essential parts of the ecosystem to be cherished and

protected rather than ignored and eradicated MPRB needs to value these

species and welcome and protect them

Concern regarding perception and

treatment of wildlife described in plan1004

2272019 Monika survey 20 wildlife oppositionStop killing geese Parks shouldnt be using exterminators only non-lethal

control methods

Opposition to current management of

wildlife1005

Minneapolis Wildlifesurvey 36 wildlife opposition Prohibit the killing of wildlife in favor of relocation or other human methods

wildlife1005

582019 Sean Connnaughty survey 38 wildlife opposition End the practice of trapping and killing animals such as beaver or geeseOpposition to current management of

wildlife1005

582019 Francine Marie Tolf survey 39 wildlife oppositionUrge MPRB and City to protect wildlife in parks and open spaces Needs to be a

priority Dont kill beavers or round up Canada geese

wildlife1005

582019 Jaden Hansen survey 40 wildlife opposition

Alarmed at the MPRBs seeming hostility towards wildlife in parks Is

appreciation for nature and wildlife not why we go to the park Having animals

in the parks allows me to teach my daughter about what they are and be close

to them Animals are part of why I go to parks and not a school playground

wildlife1005

582019 Audrey survey 41 wildlife opposition Want wildlife living on parkland to be protected prioritized and valuedOpposition to current management of

wildlife1005

582019 Sigrid survey 42 wildlife opposition

maintained for years to come Specific concerns are around the inhumane

treatment of geese and danger squirrels are in due to dogs There needs to

policy around the inhumane treatment by MPRB approved contractors and the

behavior of humans with dogs off leash

wildlife1005

582019 Maggie OConnor survey 43 wildlife opposition

Plan mentions managing excessively high populations of a given species but the

killings of geese at Loring last year were uncalled for and overdone given the

small number of geese families at the time

wildlife1005

5102019 Rachel Augusta survey 46 wildlife opposition Prohibit the killing of wildlife in favor of relocation or other human methodsOpposition to current management of

wildlife1005

Packet Pg 124

System Plan

support

suggestion

5112019 Leslie survey 47 wildlife opposition Prohibit the killing of wildlife in favor of relocation or other human methodsOpposition to current management of

wildlife1005

5132019 Carmine Profant survey 49 wildlife opposition Prohibit the killing of wildlife in favor of relocation or other human methodsOpposition to current management of

wildlife1005

4182019

Community

Environmental

Advisory Commission

(CEAC)

letter na wildlife

Add a plan to increase the acreage of pollinator friendly habitats commitment

to planting milkweed in all pollinator friendly habitats and educational outreach

and awareness campaigns focused on affordability and positive benefits of

pollinator friendly habitats

Suggestion for additional actions and

activities related to pollinators1006

Bird Sanctuaryletter na wildlife suggestion

Add 392 Explore and maximize use of pollinator friendly native plants in lieu of

introduced species

5132019 Carmine Profant survey 49 wildlife suggestionUrge MPRB to make the park system friendly to wildlife with pollinator friendly

native plantings

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34 wildlifeIdentify areas of high wildlife value to be protected from recreation and high-

impact human activities on all MPRB property

Suggestion to add additional areas of

high wildlife value that are protected

from human activity of high impact

Minneapolis Wildlifesurvey 36 wildlife suggestion

Protect areas of high wildlife value from high-impact human activities and

human recreation other than nature observation or

restoration

5102019 Rachel Augusta survey 46 wildlife suggestion

restoration

5112019 Leslie survey 47 wildlife suggestion

restoration

5132019 Carmine Profant survey 49 wildlife suggestion

restoration

Packet Pg 125

System Plan

support

suggestion

Plan and schedule high-impact MPRB activities (such as construction and tree

removal) to avoid nesting and migration seasons

Suggestion to better coordinate high

impact activities in parks to not

interfere with nesting a migration

seasons

5102019 Rachel Augusta survey 46 wildlife suggestionPlan and schedule high-impact MPRB activities (such as construction and tree

seasons

5112019 Leslie survey 47 wildlife suggestionPlan and schedule high-impact MPRB activities (such as construction and tree

seasons

5132019 Carmine Profant survey 49 wildlife suggestionPlan and schedule high-impact MPRB activities (such as construction and tree

seasons

592019 Donna Dralle survey 45 wildlife suggestion

Please consider the effect your plans have on wildlife We need them and they

have too much pressure on them as it is which effects their survival The

ecosystem needs them to be healthy

Suggestion to consider the impacts on

wildlife of MPRB plans1009

5132019 Carmine Profant survey 49 wildlife suggestionEducate the public about the value and inherent rights of all types of wildlife

the values of wildlife1010

Making birds and other wildlife and their habitats one of the priorities of the

Park Board needs to be emphasized throughout the document

Suggestion to emphasize wildlife and

their habitats as an MPRB priority1011

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34 wildlife suggestion Enhance and expand habitat for wildlife throughout the park systemSuggestion to enhance and expand

wildlife habitat1012

Enhance and expand habitat for wildlife throughout the Park system from

natural areas to small areas such as boulevards

Suggestion to enhance and expand

5102019 Rachel Augusta survey 46 wildlife suggestionEducate the public about the value and inherent rights of all types of wildlife

5102019 Rachel Augusta survey 46 wildlife suggestionEnhance and expand habitat for wildlife throughout the Park system from

Packet Pg 126

System Plan

support

suggestion

5112019 Leslie survey 47 wildlife suggestionEducate the public about the value and inherent rights of all types of wildlife

5112019 Leslie survey 47 wildlife suggestionEnhance and expand habitat for wildlife throughout the Park system from

5132019 Carmine Profant survey 49 wildlife suggestionEnhance and expand habitat for wildlife throughout the Park system from

The Minneapolis Chain of LakesTheodore Wirth Park IBA includes a lot of

parkland where a total of 263 species of birds have been recorded including 72

species of Conservation Concern The plan should explicitly address the

importance of this area to bird habitat and include protections for this habitat

Suggestion to include more

information and protections for the

Minneapolis Chain of LakesTheodore

Wirth Park IBA

4102019 Ed McFadden survey 32 wildlife suggestionProjects should include a wildlife impact component to assess project impact to

wildlife and reduceeliminate adverse effects

Suggestion to include wildlife impact

assessment for MPRB projects1014

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34 wildlife suggestion

Require wildlife impact assessments for every MPRB project and require projects

to minimize wildlife and habitat impacts Assessment should include the

identification of high wildlife value areas that need to be protected

Require a wildlife impact assessment for every MPRB project and require

projects to minimize wildlife and habitat impacts

5102019 Rachel Augusta survey 46 wildlife suggestionRequire a wildlife impact assessment for every MPRB project and require

Packet Pg 127

System Plan

support

suggestion

5112019 Leslie survey 47 wildlife suggestionRequire a wildlife impact assessment for every single MPRB project and require

5132019 Carmine Profant survey 49 wildlife suggestionRequire a wildlife impact assessment for every MPRB project and require

582019 Sean Connnaughty survey 38 wildlife suggestionbuild in adaptability in landscaping and management to incorporate beaver and

other wildlife activity

Suggestion to keep protect and

share space with wildlife1015

582019 Francine Marie Tolf survey 39 wildlife suggestionHabitat for many animals is shrinking because of humans In these limited spaces

we can and must work to share space with animals

592019 kelly survey 44 wildlife concern Please keep wildlife and protect it This means they share our spacesSuggestion to keep protect and

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34 wildlife LifeMinimize wildlife conflicts through modification of human activities (education

and limiting access) rather than eliminating wildlife

Suggestion to minimize wildlife

conflicts by modifyinglimiting human

activity

Minimize conflicts with wildlife by modifying human activities through public

education and limits on activities

activity

5102019 Rachel Augusta survey 46 wildlife suggestionMinimize conflicts with wildlife by modifying human activities through public

activity

5112019 Leslie survey 47 wildlife suggestionMinimize conflicts with wildlife by modifying human activities through public

activity

5132019 Carmine Profant survey 49 wildlife suggestionMinimize conflicts with wildlife by modifying human activities through public

activity

Add a new recommendation to require buildings to have bird-safe glass and dark

sky friendly lighting Add a life goal to Make lighting on park property safe for

birds Incorporate language into recommendations 331 and 339 to include

specifics reducing bird collisions and bird-safe glass

Suggestion to require all buildings and

lighting to be bird safe1017

Packet Pg 128

System Plan

support

suggestion

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

There should be a lighting policy requiring all park buildings and lighting to be

safe for birds wildlife and humans MPRB and the City of Minneapolis should

work together to then implement throughout all of Minneapolis Follow

BirdSafe guidelines for all buildings There must be statements committing to

bird-safe buildings and lighting on parkland

Implement a bird-safe building and lighting policy that requires all buildings and

lighting on parkland to be safe for birds Work with the City of Minneapolis to

ensure that all buildings and lights are bird friendly

ensure that all buildings and lights are bird friendly Urge MPRB to make the

park system friendly to wildlife with bird safe buildings

5132019 Carmine Profant survey 49 wildlife suggestionPlease implement polices and practices that sustain and expand wildlife habitat

and biodiversity

Suggestion to sustain and expand

wildlife habitat and biodiversity1018

582019 Maggie OConnor survey 43 wildlife supportSuggests a full-time wildlife advocate for the parks an ecologist with a passion

for urban wildlife

Support for an ecologist position with

a focus towards wildlife1019

Bird Sanctuaryletter na wildlife support

Support recommendation 231 related to designing structural BMPs to reduce

conflict with wildlife

Support for designing BMPs with

wildlife in mind1020

Packet Pg 129

System Plan

support

suggestion

542019 Leslie survey 37plan function layout

and engagement concern Neighborhood park planning wasnt publicized sufficiently

Concern about advertisement of

neighborhood park planning1101

plan function layout

and engagement concern

This sentence is a negative statement and undermines the commitment to the

plans goals Repair of compacted or eroded soils regrowth of vegetationhellip is

simply not possible (pg 52 under Asset Management) Do plans in other aspects

of the MPRB mission such as recreation similarly suggest limits on what can be

accomplished

Concern plan doesnt go far enough

lacks commitment and accountability1102

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34plan function layout

The plan doesnt go far enough It currently reads more like an Ecological

Summary rather than an Ecological Plan Strong starting point but needs to do

more to plan how to improve and sustain ecological function on parklands

Document seems to list and rationalize current policies and practices rather than

describing how to commit to how to improve ecological function The way things

are worded appears to shift accountability for ecosystem protection and

enhancement away from itself Cites examples of how plan is written outlining

items out of MPRBs control due to jurisdiction or restoration not being possible

Most recommendations are vague and non-committal and need to be

strengthened Verbs like explore evaluate plan and continue are used rather

than implement enact act and initiate which suggests more planning rather

than action

Need a strong plan that focuses on protecting and restoring the environment

rather than one that shifts responsibility away from MPRB MPRB can commit to

improve many things under its immediate control and repair and restore natural

areas these commitments are missing in the plan

Disappointed with the draft plan It summarizes current policies and practices

but dont go far enough to describe ecological function and commit to policies

and practices that will sustain and enhance it

5122019 Constance Pepin survey 48plan function layout

The plan says its hard to restore the environment instead of stepping up Hard

yes impossible no

Packet Pg 130

System Plan

support

suggestion

Plan misses the essence of the cycle of life and food chain concepts core to

ecological function This is especially evident in the Life chapter which has high

level goals rather than details action steps Stacked benefits are not sufficient in

this 6th extinction era

Concern plan misses the essence of

concepts core to ecological function1103

442019 Doug survey 31plan function layout

Lots of good information in the plan but implementation will require substantial

and long term commitment by MPRB

Concern regarding implementation of

plan1104

The Life section fails to bring the other sections of the plan into an ecological

approach therefore failing to address life itself

Concern regarding organization of the

Life chapter1105

3232019 Beth survey 27plan function layout

While people may love golf we need to protect our natural world first and not

prioritize golf courses Some golf courses may need to return to their initial lake

or wetland forms as climate changes brings and increase in large rainstorms

Concern regarding prioritization of

recreation over natural resources and

wildlife

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

Theres a lack of recommendations to sustaining biodiversity and ecological

function The recommendations currently further reflect on maximizing

recreation versus protecting and optimizing ecological function

wildlife

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

This statement shows a failure to focus on ecological function and bias towards

recreation over ecology Situated in Minnesotas largest and most visited city

the Minneapolis park system must adhere to a maintenance standard and level

of service that meets the needs and demands of millions of community and out-

of-area park visitors Suggests instead Situated in the Mississippi Flyway used

by hundreds of species and millions of migrating birds twice a year the

Minneapolis park system must prioritize the preservation and enhancement of

wildlife habitat and the protection of birds migrating through Minneapolis and

other wildlife essential to a healthy ecosystem

wildlife

Packet Pg 131

System Plan

support

suggestion

As elected officials most important function is to preserve and protect the

natural resources and ecologically systems Climate change proves sustainable

recreation isnt possible without a healthy environment This includes the

wildlife who are an essential element of our urban ecosystem Too often

recreation take priority and displaces our natural resources and wildlife with

adverse impacts on ecosystems

wildlife

582019 Maggie OConnor survey 43plan function layout

Parks have two functions human recreation and protection of wildlife

Protection of wildlife is particularly important in dense urban areas where the

urban environment threatens wildlife both migratory and those in Minnesota

year-round Goals seem admirable but give highest priority to recreation Gives

recent examples of this at Loring Park related to goose management and taking

cattails out with the effect of decimating the red-wing blackbird population and

increasing algal blooms Plan views parks as it used for pleasure rather than a

gift which should be considered precious

wildlife

and engagement suggestion

Plan seems to have been written years before now when the current crisis has

become evident Many articles are sounding the alarm on the mass extinction of

a million species The plan needs to embraces a paradigm shift away from a

focus on recreation towards a focus on ecology and wildlife All existing habitat

needs to be preserved and protected Humans cant continue to maximize their

use as the expense of wildlife Humans need to change their behavior and

expectations and MPRB must show leadership in educating humans and

prioritizing the environment The world wont end if humans cant do everything

they want it a park but the world as we know it will end unless humans sustain

and enhance the ecological function

wildlife

2142019 Kathie Noga survey 2plan function layout

and engagement concern Plan is not detailed enough

Concern regarding the lack of detail in

the plan1107

Packet Pg 132

System Plan

support

suggestion

2142019 Lila M Smith survey 1plan function layout

Wishes they had been included into recently adopted park master plans

Neighborhoods not high in existing natural resources (ex lakes river) still want

to have some nature in their parks and would be healthier if there were places

to enjoy fresh air and trails

Concern regarding the plans

relationship with park master plans1108

How will the plan interface with neighborhood park plans They need to work

together In park plans Ive looked at theres an increase in impervious surface

reduction in green space and tree removal to add new structures and activities

582019 Jaden Hansen survey 40plan function layout

and engagement opposition

Shamefult o see this plan introduced in Minneapolis in 2019 Would like my tax

dollars to be spent on efforts to promote biodiversity and be cognizant of the

world we live in in 2019 Find dynamic and creative ways to coexist To do

otherwise is out of touch and raised attention to those who advocate for making

wildlife a priority

Opposition to the plan 1109

Section at the end tying goals to recommendations is helpful but the labeling

should be consistent

Suggestion for consistent labeling of

goals in the document1110

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

Remove wherever possible from most of the text If given the option human

nature is to do the easiest

Suggestion for document language

that shows a greater commitment to

implementation

Revise text so it says The Thomas Sadler Roberts Bird Sanctuary is within the

Minneapolis Chain of Lakes Regional Parkhellip since Minneapolis Chain of Lakes

Regional Park is the IBA not just Roberts Bird Sanctuary (page 79)

Suggestion for text clarifications 1112

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

The statement related to Audubon Society on page 70 should be clarified

because the two organizations are not the sameSuggestion for text clarifications 1112

The plan incorrectly describe the IBA which is more than just Roberts Bird

Sanctuary The Minneapolis Chain of LakesTheodore Wirth Park IBA includes a

lot of parkland where a total of 263 species of birds have been recorded

including 72 species of Conservation Concern

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

Add and support native plants animals and birds to the end of MPRB Vision

Theme 1

Suggestion for text revision to other

MPRB statements and goals1113

Packet Pg 133

System Plan

support

suggestion

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

and engagement

Revise description of Environmental Stewardship under MPRB structure to

include hellipnatural spaces to support native plants animals and birds which

meanshellip

This paragraph is unnecessarily negative and doesnt refer to water While

there is certainly opportunity to create habitat at a certain scale in each of the

neighborhood parkshellip Could be reworded to following While the most

extensive and highest quality habitats for wildlife in the parks are found in

regional parks there is opportunity to create habitat at an appropriate scale in

each of the neighborhood parks that MPRB manages

Suggestion for text revision under

Water and Life1114

2182019 Harriet McCleary survey 8plan function layout

Making plans is a healthy way to approach a problem but making decisions early

avoids a lot of problems later

Suggestion regarding approach to

plan1115

3112019 Ginny Halloran survey 24plan function layout

Hope the plan becomes a living document with measurable goals reported out

periodically

Suggestion regarding plan

implementation communication1116

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

[with regard to dog waste education and signage] a solution may be more dog

parks located appropriately

Suggestion to add more dog parks in

appropriate locations1117

and engagement suggestion Expand the goals to include all of the parks

Suggestion to apply land goals to all

parks1118

and engagement suggestion Get public input and do something the public really wants

Suggestion to collect and listen to

public input1119

Before or during the development of park master plans there should be a

complete park-specific Natural Resource Management plan

Suggestion to complete natural

resource management plans during

the park master planning process

2182019 Barbara survey 12plan function layout

Contributions to restoring soil water and air allow Earth to continue supporting

life All is related

Suggestion to consider the

relationships between plan topic

Ecological and park planning groups should share information since there seems

to be a lot of topic crossover

Suggestion to coordinate across

ecological and park planning efforts1122

Packet Pg 134

System Plan

support

suggestion

2192019 Susu Jeffrey survey 15plan function layout

and engagement suggestion Dont overthink the plan and start now

Suggestion to get started

implementing the plan1123

Publicize the Ecological System Plan more widely Many people havent hear

about the plan

Suggestion to more broadly share the

plan1124

2272019 Monika survey 20plan function layout

Please start working on habitat connectivity now specifically underpass habitat

connectivity Im sure there would be people will to donate or other funding

mechanisms for underpasses There is need now to reduce hazards for both

human and wildlife

Suggestion to prioritize certain

elements of the plan1125

362019 Brian Crotteau survey 22plan function layout

and engagement suggestion Habitat restoration needs to be much more urgent

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

Carbon sequestration should be a secondary goal to providing an environment

for quality green space to benefit people animals and birds Providing green

space (trees shrubs native plants) will fulfill the sequestering goal

MPRB needs to prioritize the protection of wildlife and expansion and

enhancement of wildlife habitat and corridors in all parks and areas managed by

5102019 Rachel Augusta survey 46plan function layout

5132019 Carmine Profant survey 49plan function layout

Set ground rules for water use including conservation because it will become

scare and we cant survive without it

Suggestion to set rules related to

water useconsumption1126

415 is an excellent idea but should be stated more strongly than a budget

recommendation

commitment to the recommendation

for a staff ecologist

Packet Pg 135

System Plan

support

suggestion

Goals are all good but odd that the first focus is water and air quality It would

be helpful to tie goals with recommendations like in chapter 4

Suggestion to tie goals with

recommendations in the Life chapter1128

and engagement support Most support for life goals I through L Support for goals in the life chapter 1129

4182019

Community

Environmental

Advisory Commission

(CEAC)

letter naplan function layout

and engagement support

CEAC supports the draft plan with a few suggested amendments The plan is

broad multifaceted and well researched It will have a dramatic and lasting

impact on the local environment

Support for the plan 1130

2212019 Barbara Norblom survey 18plan function layout

Thrilled this plan has been drafted Grateful for an opportunity to comment and

be part of the processSupport for the plan 1130

and engagement support Love that there is a plan Support for the plan 1130

and engagement support kudos to a great job Support for the plan 1130

4192019 TWP survey 35plan function layout

and engagement support Plan is a welcome addition to our park system Support for the plan 1130

Packet Pg 136

Ecological System Plan Public Comment on Draft Plan

Lila M Smith

I wish that these goals had been included in the 2020 plans that were just completed for individual parks I believe that all Minneapolis Parks could benefit by adding Habitat Connectivity and Habitat Biodiversity For those of us living in neighborhoods whos Parks lack Natural Areas we hunger for a bit of nature Not everyone lives near one of the lakes or the river but we still desire enjoyment of natural areas We would be healthier with fresh air and nature trails to bring us out Most Parks would benefit by the addition of Native plants and Rain Gardens Almost all lawns could be Bee Lawns Annuals are wasteful and I support switching to native perennials There were proposals to add grass buffers around trees and not use the weed-whip A better idea would be to plant perennial natives around the base of new trees I didnt see anything in the proposed plans about training new ground crews on the care of native plants and bee lawns All these concerns could have been included in the planning for individual parks

Expand these goals to all our parks and add native perennials and rain gardens to all of them Train Ground Crews so they understand environmental organic practices

11COMPLETECOMPLETE

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Thursday February 14 2019 72957 PMThursday February 14 2019 72957 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Thursday February 14 2019 74728 PMThursday February 14 2019 74728 PMTime SpentTime Spent 001731001731IP AddressIP Address 75721832177572183217

Packet Pg 137

Kathie Noga

Please get pesticides out of the park It is about time you do what is morally right for us who live with chemical sensitivity allergies and asthma Please be the change you said you were going to be Nothing stated about this terrible problem of us being excluded from the park because of pesticides terrible health effects

I would like more details period in the plan It is too general not specific enough I think you need to get some input from the public and I would like to see you actually do something the public really wants

22COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 138

I would like to see more to specifically address stormwater outfalls along the Mississippi River Most of the storm water oufalls occur in MPRB property I think a lot could be done to capture and filter the water before it goes into the Mississippi River

I would like to see more about native plantings in place of typical grass areas

33COMPLETECOMPLETE

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Friday February 15 2019 121659 AMFriday February 15 2019 121659 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Friday February 15 2019 122431 AMFriday February 15 2019 122431 AMTime SpentTime Spent 000731000731IP AddressIP Address 172588399172588399

Packet Pg 139

Instead of exploring policy and procedure changes resulting in reduced fleet emissions it is my hope that this plan is very forward thinking and has stronger language such as committing to a 100 zero-emissions fleet in the near future

It is 2019 and we STILL have national leaders who still dispute science and the harm we humans do to the environment around usbut we can lead at a local level pave the way for other metropolitan areas in the country and in the world to adopt how we in Minneapolis take care of the environment believe in science and truly plan for the future

44COMPLETECOMPLETE

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Monday February 18 2019 120725 PMMonday February 18 2019 120725 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Monday February 18 2019 121111 PMMonday February 18 2019 121111 PMTime SpentTime Spent 000345000345IP AddressIP Address 4301123443011234

Packet Pg 140

Sam Benson

I want to see a strong commitment to moving quickly towards a zero emissions vehicle fleet and away from a gas powered fleet This a great way to lower carbon emissions and improve air quality

55COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 141

Mary Theresa Downing

I would like the Park Board to plan on having a 100 zero emissions fleet in the near future I think it takes a strong commitment to sustain movement toward clean energy use and I hope all Minneapolis departments would aim for that

I would like the Park Board to not only replace trees that have been removed and add to our parks urban forest but also work to educate citizens and suppliers about trees that are likely to thrive in a warmer climate than we currently have Setting up a tree planting project that uses volunteers and summer youth workers perhaps in partnership with non-profits might dramatically increase the number of trees in the city which could offset the poor air quality and higher temperatures were expected to have as temperatures rise

66COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 142

Michelle

I would like to see a final plan that includes the Park Board committing to shifting away from gasoline vehicles and to a 100 zero-emissions fleet Use solar panels on Park buildingsenergy needs

77COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 143

Harriet McCleary

Water is going to become scarce if we dont manage its use now We need to set ground rules for use including conservation We certainly wont survive without clean water

Making plans is always a healthy way to approach a problem Plans can always be modified later but making decisions early avoids a lot of problems later

88COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 144

Evan Mulholland

100 electric vehicles These can do the job for less money and are consistent with the plan to get Minneapolis to 100 renewable power

We should not buy a single new gas or diesel vehicle for the park fleet

99COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 145

Maddie

I would like to see the board make a stronger commitment to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by shifting away from gasoline vehicles to a 100 zero-emissions fleet It is essential that we prioritize the environment We must not only commit halfway by reducing fleet emissions We must eliminate them This is a small but crucial step we can take to ensuring a better future for our city country and planet

Please continue to be a leading force in the fight against climate change As part of the government it is your responsibility to fight for what is right

Packet Pg 146

Rebecca K

I am concerned about air quality in our parks (and the impacts of park management on climate change) and would like to see this plan committing to 100 zero-emissions vehicles within the next decade

Packet Pg 147

Barbara

It is each contribution to restoring soil water and air to its capacity to thrive that will allow Earth to continue supporting life ALL IS RELATED

Please keep the above in mind as you attempt to support life

Packet Pg 148

Margaret Sweeney

I would like to see the park board commit to transitioning to a 100 zero emissions fleet by the year 2025 This initiative while ambitious is achievable and imperative for our future generations health and well-being

Packet Pg 149

I would prefer to see a final plan that includes the Park Board ldquocommitting to shifting away from gasoline vehicles and to a 100 zero-emissions fleetrdquo I would also like you to take every opportunity in the plan to curb carbon emissions and mitigate climate change

Packet Pg 150

Susu Jeffrey

Cheapest most effective airwater scrubbing effort is to preserve trees and to reforest here in the Big Woods Buying clean cars and other techno fixes is both pricey and sexy but tree planting is the best easiest smartest community effort we could do especially if we begin immediately

Dont overthink your plan Be smart start now

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Tuesday February 19 2019 12701 AMTuesday February 19 2019 12701 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Tuesday February 19 2019 13832 AMTuesday February 19 2019 13832 AMTime SpentTime Spent 001131001131IP AddressIP Address 66871452406687145240

Packet Pg 151

Mary Ludington

Ecological System Plan

I appreciate exploring policy and procedure changes that would result in MPRB fleet emissions But PLEASE consider committing to transitioning to an all electric fleet

Packet Pg 152

Jessica Wardlaw

The air we breathe is vital to our health and survival

Everyone deserves clean and air and water absolutely free of pollutantscontaminates

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Tuesday February 19 2019 113504 PMTuesday February 19 2019 113504 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Tuesday February 19 2019 113744 PMTuesday February 19 2019 113744 PMTime SpentTime Spent 000240000240IP AddressIP Address 739421135739421135

Packet Pg 153

Barbara Norblom

Im encouraged by learning that the MPRB is looking at reducing emissions produced by its own fleet of vehicles However the language is not showing the urgency with which we need to act on climate change Id like to see a more rigorous timeline

I really am thrilled that this Ecological System Plan has even been drafted Looks like its been a lot of work and I appreciate all efforts to nurture a healthier ecosystem I also am grateful for the opportunity to comment and be a part of the process

Packet Pg 154

Julia Rice

The current language in the draft Ecological System Plan regarding reducing emissions for the vehicle fleet does not go far enough Please commit to shifting the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Boards fleet of vehicles away from gasoline powered vehicles to a 100 zero emissions fleet Thank you for your time

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Friday February 22 2019 22450 PMFriday February 22 2019 22450 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Friday February 22 2019 23210 PMFriday February 22 2019 23210 PMTime SpentTime Spent 000719000719IP AddressIP Address 7516813319575168133195

Packet Pg 155

Monika

I am THRILLED beyond belief to see habitat connectivity as a priority I am so excited to see discussion of creating underpasses (and maybe even overpasses I hope) and other options to mitigate the impact of roads on turtles and frogs Please start doing this work Im sure the city could find donors to fund underpasses and other mechanisms to support wildlife mobility Lake Harriet roadway is in terrible condition The city should look to redo the roadway and insert one or more underpasses I would donate to this immediately There are also lots of dead muskrats in the spring and summer near the 62 intersection with 35W near the Portland exit because there is a large pond there but zero barriers discouraging wildlife This is a hazard for us all human and wildlife Stop mowing so much Where are any prairies I most support the last 4 Life goals (I through L) I love adding more pollinatir habitat and have a robust native focused garden with lots of flowering and fruiting plants for pollinators and birds Stop killing geese The Park should not be using exterminators There should be ONLY non-lethal control methods used It is a betrayal of stewardship to use extermination

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Wednesday February 27 2019 115715 AMWednesday February 27 2019 115715 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Wednesday February 27 2019 13740 PMWednesday February 27 2019 13740 PMTime SpentTime Spent 014025014025IP AddressIP Address 198179137200198179137200

Packet Pg 156

Brian Crotteau

1 Dog poop Dog poop seems to be a contributing factor to impaired waters around the lakes Even when people pick up some is left and washed into the lake Many people dont pick up and the poop washes into the lake

2 Litter In the summer I make weekly treks along the shore to pick up garbage Plastic straws diapers plastic cups cigarette butts plastic wrap of all sorts For every 200-300 feet of shore I could fill a medium to large sized garbage bag This garbage impairs the waters

3 Homeowners Home owners on the east side of Lake Harriet drain their swimming pool water directly into the lake I have reported 3 different incidents to 311 The city responded to me that this was ok as long as the owner de-chlorined the water The water is not de-chlorinated and non one monitors it

4 Homeowners People still spray toxic chemicals on their lawns put on fertilizers and rake their leaves directly into the streets These activities should be banned

5 Storm water treatment I know that some improvements have been made to route storm water through settling ponds and rain gardens But it is way too little On the east and south sides of Harriet storm water still drains directly into the lake bringing yard chemicals oil gas and garbage right into the lake I think that all direct storm drainage into the lake needs to end

6 Invasive species More needs to be done to rid the lakes of milfoil and other invasives AND restore native plants into the lakes and shore

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Wednesday March 06 2019 124408 PMWednesday March 06 2019 124408 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Wednesday March 06 2019 10222 PMWednesday March 06 2019 10222 PMTime SpentTime Spent 001813001813IP AddressIP Address 19924742461992474246

Packet Pg 157

I love the fact that there is a plan and I will comment on other sections I have a general comment that we need to restore these little ecosystems in our parks not just remove invasives and not just have acres and acres of turf grass In general the default planting of new plants and trees should be to always try natives first We are facing an insect bird and pollinator apocalypse and our native creatures can only live on and feed on native plantsNo Ginko trees no Eucalyptus trees We want native trees planted in our parks and on boulevards

Packet Pg 158

Brian Crotteau

Packet Pg 159

1 Invasive species Buckthorn garlic mustard burdock and reed canary grass are still posing too great a threat to the remaining habitats in our parks The Park should get even more aggressive to work with staff outside groups the State and even citizen volunteers to eradicate these invasives from our parks However this should not be the end goal in itself its just a step toward habitat restoration and sustainability

2 Tree plantings Whenever a tree is taken down in a park especially natural areas the defaul choice for a new planting must be a native tree not a cultivar hybrid or non-native Non native tree plantings are directly contributing to the extinction of our birds insects and pollinators This is not a joke This is an emergency Our native critters birds and bugs depend on acorns from red or white oaks not on seeds from Ginko trees

3 Habitat restoration Our parks need much more urgent on habitat restoration Removal of invasives planting and re-establishing natives and converting non-native grass turn areas into pollinator habitats even if they are small Each park should have multiple pollinator gardens these could be maintained by volunteers There is too much turf grass and too many mowed areas Where possible use controlled burns to simulate pre-development conditions

4 Pollinators Related to 3 above our parks should be havens for pollinators We are facing pollinator extinction this is not fake news Our parks need to recognize this and do something about it

5 Lakeshore habitat Volunteers have been removing invasives along Minnehaha Creek Harriet Maka Ska and Cedar allowing for amazing native plants to come back on their own only to have the areas mowed to the ground There is too much of an obsession with mowing every possible space Lake shores need to be mostly unmowed native plants shrubs and trees and native aquatic plants and grasses There need to be designated non-mowed habitat areas along the lakes that are teeming with a biodiversity of native plants This must be priority

Life I love the Life section of the plan and would reiterate how critical it is to remove invasive and non-native plants from all our park lands and lakes and replace them with native trees and plants so that this life and actually eat live sleep and reproduce in our parks Norway Maple Ginko and other non-native trees do not provide reliable or sustainable food for our native birds animals insects and other critters

Recommendations main points

1 Remove all invasives from all parks 2 Restore to native habitat and plants 3 Stop direct storm runoff into lakes 4 More gardens and spaces for natural areas even in parks used for sports etc there are creative ways to add mini habitats 5 No invasive hybrid or non-native trees planted in the city 6 Similar to 5 stop planting non native trees in boulevards Native should always be first choice

Packet Pg 160

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Friday March 08 2019 93441 AMFriday March 08 2019 93441 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Friday March 08 2019 94245 AMFriday March 08 2019 94245 AMTime SpentTime Spent 000803000803IP AddressIP Address 1745324818717453248187

Packet Pg 161

Ginny Halloran

Kudos to a great job 1) I would like to see Education of the Public become an area of responsibility of the park system that is emphasized You can teach us about carbon sequestration composting use of less salt using perenniels instead of annuals healthy soils etc

2) I did not see any mention of urban agriculture not even trying to figure out how it fits within the system if thats where youre at though I may have missed it It would be nice to have some food growing within our park systems to lend the importance of local food systems There are small triangles that could be great community gardens that bring the community together as well as help teach us the importance of composting and how to have good compost for the soil

I hope it becomes a living document that has measurable goals that are reported on periodically to the public

Thanks for all you do tso that we have the best park system in the country

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Monday March 11 2019 15002 PMMonday March 11 2019 15002 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Monday March 11 2019 20228 PMMonday March 11 2019 20228 PMTime SpentTime Spent 001226001226IP AddressIP Address 7573012275730122

Packet Pg 162

I applaud the new recommendations related to lighting Light pollution is an unnecessary waste of money and energy and an ecological threat we can reduce by lighting intelligently Simply put life on earth evolved with bright days AND dark nights and every ecosystem has countless species both nocturnal or crepuscular that have evolved to depend on darkness Too often when making an ecological plan we simply forget the importance of nights natural darkness While society will often argue that more light will mean more safety and security but that is seldom the case I urge you to create sensible and intelligent lighting policy that recognizes the ecological value of darkness See the work done by the International Dark-Sky Association for more Thanks

55 1 Explore dark sky certifed lighting to limit light spillover 55 2 Explore areas where lighting can be changed redirected or timed diferently to limit impacts on neighborhoods as well as natural areas

Thank you for helping to make the park system so wonderful

Packet Pg 163

Kathie Noga

I would like to see a commitment by the Board to get rid of the pesticides in the park As a chemically sensitive individual who also suffers from allergies and asthma I got to tell you there are parts of the parks I cannot use when they use pesticides This the 21st Century for heavens sake We should not be using 19th Century mentality and still keep using them I am totally disgusted that this is happening

Get more specific on this plan It is way too general in focus Details are lacking and this is not acceptable to the public You say you are going to have public input Then listen to the public and do something we all can be proud and get rid of those pesticides

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Friday March 22 2019 42757 PMFriday March 22 2019 42757 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Friday March 22 2019 43206 PMFriday March 22 2019 43206 PMTime SpentTime Spent 000409000409IP AddressIP Address 207225131228207225131228

Packet Pg 164

Irsquom impressed with the parks systems work on improving the environment for native animals plants and wildlife Irsquom glad to see that you are working with the u of m scientists and that you want to add an ecologist to the park staff

Irsquom happy to live in a city that has invested so heavily in our parks and is dedicated to protecting them I would love to see increases in parkland areas like the upper Mississippi park with its very natural areas with trails running through it I realize people love golf but we need to protect our natural world first and shouldnrsquot prioritize golf courses over wetlands Climate change will probably mean more large rain storms and we may need to adjust our land use to best deal with that Where lakes and wetlands were filled in to create golf courses in the past we may need to decide to dig them out again We have to look at long term effects not short term enjoyment

On another topic perhaps I missed it in the long document but Irsquom hoping there is some sort of Japanese beetle management plan Irsquove read that using the traps as an individual home owner isnrsquot effective but if done on a citywide scale it might be

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Saturday March 23 2019 83354 PMSaturday March 23 2019 83354 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Saturday March 23 2019 84402 PMSaturday March 23 2019 84402 PMTime SpentTime Spent 001008001008IP AddressIP Address 65128511496512851149

Packet Pg 165

john klein

Regarding park forests We are removing a lot of valuable habitat by the overly zealous work of tree removal For example When we lost our resident screech owl population the forester said he cut down a tree last week with a screech owl nest in it Bird nesting habitat flying squirrels it is substantial Regarding park trees There is substantial damage to our local park trees from mowing carelessly and hitting the trunks I will send a collection of photos to maintenance Regarding Park workers vehicles We still havenrsquot had the repair work done that was promised when a leader drove a front end loader on a task Vehicles have done considerable damage again this spring and unfortunately donrsquot take the time to repair it If you want photos let me know

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Sunday March 24 2019 84912 AMSunday March 24 2019 84912 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Sunday March 24 2019 91237 AMSunday March 24 2019 91237 AMTime SpentTime Spent 002324002324IP AddressIP Address 2471926724719267

Packet Pg 166

Jeremy Bergerson

As someone who lives in an area that is severely adversely affected by the VOCs coming off of I-94 I very much appreciate that the Plan focuses on areas of the city that are harmed by freeways (ie cars and other vehicles) I am however disappointed that unlike the Citys 2040 Comprehensive Plan the Ecological Plan calls only for canopy maintenance instead of expansion The boulevards throughout our city are not nearly fully stocked and while I completely agree that private land is where the biggest gains can be made MPRB has direct control over the boulevards and can have an immediate impact by focusing on filling them up as much as possible

I am very happy that MPRB is focusing on its role as our citys ecological steward environmental matters are really where MPRB is the most logical player unlike in transportation where MPRB should absolutely defer in all instances to the City given MPRBs spotty track record in planning transportation infrastructure

Nature is one of our best ways to combat climate change and pollution Please please please consider how we can add as many trees as possible to our city which will cool clean and beautify our city

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Monday March 25 2019 83607 AMMonday March 25 2019 83607 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Monday March 25 2019 84336 AMMonday March 25 2019 84336 AMTime SpentTime Spent 000729000729IP AddressIP Address 67220151816722015181

Packet Pg 167

Timothyjlamb

Protecting and enhancing all the flora and fauna of the park system will improve the quality of life for everyone in the city One item that needs immediate attention is the supervision of the rapidly increasing canine population Allowing their owners to run them off lease destroying the flora and fauna of the park system needs to be stopped immediately

Packet Pg 168

A) MPRB should significantly increase its support and funding of its Natural Resource Management Program The park systemrsquos natural area land holdings necessitate more investment Increasing MPRBrsquos internal capacity andor funding for ecological contractors will enable the program to address decades of deferred maintenance in the park systemrsquos natural areas After the initial (and more expensive) restoration work is complete lower-cost long-term management will be required

B) Before or during the development of each individual park master plan or update MPRB should complete a park-specific ldquoNatural Resource Management Planrdquo It is essential to look first at a particular parkrsquos natural resources before you can make informed decisions regarding master planning Conservation planning and development practices should be followed during park master planning including protection of high quality sensitive andor large ldquocorerdquo natural areas using techniques such as designating protected areas ecological buffering restoration and management

C) The use of goats for invasive plant control should be evaluated in detail to ensure they are providing a meaningful ecological benefit for a reasonable cost We know they eat a lot of vegetation but are they harming native shrubs and saplings or really helping control invasive plants for the long term

D) MPRB should allocate resources to conduct regular ecological monitoring of at least its priority natural areas Photo monitoring points should be established at key locations across the park system and used for repeat photography including before and after restorationmanagement activities Invasive plant monitoring (mentioned in the recommendations) and wildlife surveys (eg bird counts) could also be done in these same or other areas This information would be valuable to track progress and enable adaptive management throughout MPRBs natural areas

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Thursday April 04 2019 33253 PMThursday April 04 2019 33253 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Thursday April 04 2019 35721 PMThursday April 04 2019 35721 PMTime SpentTime Spent 002427002427IP AddressIP Address 70971841307097184130

Packet Pg 169

There is a lot of good information and recommendations in the Plan but implementation will require a substantial and long-term commitment by the MPRB

Packet Pg 170

Ed McFadden

I picked Land but these comments apply across the board I urge the Minneapolis Park amp Recreation Board to protect enhance and expand natural areas for the benefit of birds and other animals (including humans) Projects should include a wildlife impact component to assess the effect of projects on wildlife and to adjust projects when needed to reduce or eliminate adverse effects on wildlife MPRB should plant more native trees and vegetation as food sources for birds and pollinators and other wildlife

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Wednesday April 10 2019 104033 AMWednesday April 10 2019 104033 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Wednesday April 10 2019 104155 AMWednesday April 10 2019 104155 AMTime SpentTime Spent 000122000122IP AddressIP Address 20655191102065519110

Packet Pg 171

Dr Mary Harlow

Please heed the vision of Theodore Wirth who donated all the land to create our outstanding park system for the residents of Minneapolis to enjoy greenspace natural beauty and a respite from the concrete congestion and traffic of the city Please listen to the people who are not amenable to all the new amenities the City government is pressuring the MPRB to add to our parks Please do not cover our greenspace with asphalt or cut down our beautiful and badly needed urban canopy of trees Please use our tax dollars as we have requested to maintain our parks and make badly needed repairs CIDNA residents were told that the MPRB did not have any money to address safety issues at Cedar South Beach where we need cement steps to prevent people from falling This is after they raised over $250000 of private money to redo the entire beach Lowry Hill residents were told that there were no funds to help them repair 7 Pools an historic park They were told that the MPRB wanted to spend tax dollars to build a new parking lot in the middle of Kenwood Park instead

We would like the MPRB to act independently to maintain and preserve our parks for posterity

We need wisdom and experience to guide development in and around our parks There are experts around the country great conservationists and park planners who can advise you My advice would be to consult with the Freshwater Institute on water issues the Nature Conservancy and Central Park Conservators on land and park design issues Above all listen to the taxpayers who pay for the MPRB and use the parks They have written petitioned called and testified to express their wish that you act to maintain and preserve our parks for generations to come

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Wednesday April 10 2019 81343 PMWednesday April 10 2019 81343 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Wednesday April 10 2019 90021 PMWednesday April 10 2019 90021 PMTime SpentTime Spent 004638004638IP AddressIP Address 6722013967220139

Packet Pg 172

Of course you need to consult with the many experts available This is not my area of expertise All I can tell you is that our parks and waterways in Minneapolis are under siege from rapacious development that threatens to pollute and destroy them and with them an entire way of life We hope that the Park Board with take a stand to defend the natural beauty of the land You failed to stand up to the City and their developers to defend the Shoreland Overlay Ordinance that protected our waterways and the land surrounding them for public enjoyment for over 30 years We trust you will act for the long term to conserve the land in a natural state to nurture us all

Packet Pg 173

Jerry Bahls Audubon Chapter of Minneapolis

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Friday April 19 2019 102900 AMFriday April 19 2019 102900 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Friday April 19 2019 104534 AMFriday April 19 2019 104534 AMTime SpentTime Spent 001634001634IP AddressIP Address 736542122736542122

Packet Pg 174

CHAPTER 4 LAND Parkland Management ASSET MANAGEMENT Note - The failure to focus on ecological function and the bias for recreation over ecology is reflected in this statement (first paragraph) Situated in Minnesotarsquos largest and most visited city the Minneapolis park system must adhere to a maintenance standard and level of service that meets the needs and demands of millions of community and out-of-area park visitors rdquo How about instead Situated in the Mississippi Flyway used by hundreds of species and millions of migrating birds twice a year the Minneapolis park system must prioritize the preservation and enhancement of wildlife habitat and the protection of birds migrating through Minneapolis and other wildlife essential to a healthy ecosystemrdquo

Ongoing Management of Impacts Related to Land CURRENT PRACTICES TO REDUCE IMPACTS TO AND FROM TREES Note - In natural areas leave dead trees as wildlife habitat

CURRENT PRACTICES TO REDUCE TREE MIX ndash 2017 Question - Why are there no conifers in your tree mix White pine Northern Cedar IMPACTS IN TURF AREAS Question - Why are there no conifers in your tree mix White pine Northern Cedar

Land Goals and Strategies ndash Facilities

FACILITYELEMENT - Athletic Fields - STRATEGY - Traditional field lights ndash Adopt ldquoDark Skyrdquo Research standards for LED lights adopt where feasiblein budget

FACILITYELEMENT - Athletic Fields - STRATEGY - General turf area - Beeflowering lawns Explore opportunities to transition general turf areas to bee flowering lawns in order to improve habitat and connect green corridors Reduce amount of turf vegetation that requires mowing by 10 over all MPRB properties by replacing with no maintenance native plants annually for next 5 years

FACILITYELEMENT - Athletic Fields - General turf ndash Pathways - STRATEGY - Promote walking biking and driving on established pathways to reduce compaction and erosion of turf areas Note - Study possibility of using permeable pavers for these pathways

Land Goals and Strategies F Improve environmental performance of turf management practices - Expand use of native low water grasses and reduce overall turf acreage restoring native plant communities where possible G Improve habitat quality in the parks Develop maintenance guidelines and staffing plans for areas considered high quality habitat Note - Limit access to these high quality habitat areas J Reduce human-related negative impacts in the parks Note - Reduce access to some areas of parks that have very high negative impacts or reduce sponsored activities K Reduce negative construction-related impacts Incorporate more sustainable and green building technology and materials into design guidelines and rehabilitation projects Note - Follow BirdSafe Guidelines for all buildings

COMMUNICATION AND PUBLIC AWARENESS In order to help reduce human-related impacts in the parks (through encroachment waste pet waste off-trail hellip Note - A very active promotion should be launched to specifically identify which parks pets are not allowed (or allowed in) in and give very explicit reasons why

Land Recommendations

Packet Pg 175

F Reduce Negative Construction-related Impacts 32 PAVED AREAS 32 2 Research and where possible implement more sustainable building practices including green materials green rooftops high albedo rooftops etc Note - See previous comment on ldquoWhere possiblerdquo All new buildings should follow Bird-Safe Guidelines 33 BUILDING-RELATED IMPACTS DRAFTING GREEN DESIGN STANDARDS 33 9 Require that construction permits issued to other agencies include environmentally friendly construction specifcations (such as erosion controls construction materials and management of waste) Note - All new buildings should follow Bird-Safe Guidelines G Maintain and improve soil health RECOMMENDATIONS 35 SOIL COMPACTION 35 1 Analyze areas most in need of decompaction andor athletic field resting Note - Study use of native grasses with very deep roots to reduce compaction H Improve environmental performance of turf management practices 37 TURF MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS 37 1 Expand use of fescue native and drought tolerant low water grasses J Protect and maintain urban forest 44 URBAN FOREST PEST MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS 44 3 Publish tree removal standards and natural forested areas management practices for public benefit Note - Include leaving dead trees standing that are not considered hazardous

RECOMMENDATIONS 47 WOOD DEBRIS 47 1 Identify areas where standing deadwood might be left for habitat and fallen deadwood might be used for seating Note - This needs to be emphasized throughout document Dead trees are so important to many native bird species as well as other animals

K Increase Habitat Connectivity CURRENT MPRB MITIGATION PRACTICES AND BMPS - MPRB has certification from National Audubon Society as an Important Birding Area and is consistent with Audubonrsquos (not affiliated with National Audubon Society) Cooperative Sanctuary program at Golf Courses Note - This should be clarified because the two Audubon organizations are not related

RECOMMENDATIONS - Identify sites with largest number of animal-roadway conficts and implement protection strategies (working with partner agencies such as MNDOT or Hennepin County) as necessary Note - Large under passes are effective allowing animal passages past highways and other animal barriers

L Reduce Human-Related Negative Impacts in the Parks 54 WASTE CURRENT MPRB MITIGATION PRACTICES AND BMPS - Dog waste education and signage Note - A very active promotion should be launched to specifically identify which parks pets are not allowed (or allowed in) in and give very explicit reasons why This problem will only get worse Another solution may be more dog parks located appropriately

55 NOISELIGHT POLLUTION RECOMMENDATIONS 55 1 Explore Install dark sky certified lighting to limit light spillover 55 2 Explore Review areas where lighting can be removed changed redirected or timed differently to limit impacts on neighborhoods as well as natural areas

Packet Pg 176

Comments on MPRB ECOLOGICAL SYSTEM PLAN

General Comments on Plan Limited in Scope - The draft Ecosystems plan does a good job of outlining MPRBrsquos current policies and practices related to Water Air Land and Life and has some good Maps as such it would more accurately be called an Ecological Summary than an Ecological Plan Itrsquos a strong starting point but needs more work to actually plan how MPRB will improve and sustain ecological function on parklands The document is disappointing in that it reads more like a list of and rationale for current MPRB policies and practices rather than a document to improve ecological function throughout the Minneapolis Park system The Plan simply does not go far enough in describing ecological function and in committing to specific policies and practices that will sustain and enhance ecological functions

Lacks Accountability - The Plan seems to shift accountability for ecosystem protection and enhancement away from itself For example it says that ldquoRepair of compacted or eroded soils regrowth of vegetation and restoration of natural asset quality takes time and in some instances is simply not possiblerdquo and While itrsquos beyond MPRBrsquos ability to commit to improved water quality given all of the externalities that are not under MPRBrsquos immediate control the organization can work toward preventing any further degradation of water quality and enhancing aquatic habitat wherever possiblerdquo Remove ldquoWhere[ever] possiblerdquo from most of the text If given the option human nature is to do the easiest

We need an Ecological Systems Plan that acknowledges challenges of restoring ecosystems (including externalities and time needed) and makes concrete commitments to rise to the challenge MPRB does in fact have the means to make repairs and implement practices that will improve water quality even if those practices require partnerships with other agencies

Missing Bio-diversity - The draft Plan seems to miss the interconnectedness of Life and the importance of wildlife to a healthy ecosystem Instead wildlife is considered something to manage and limit so that humans can use parkland This attitude is reflected in MPRBrsquos current policies and practices to remove wildlife so as not to interfere with humansrsquo recreational activities Little mention is made of the Mississippi Flyway and the need to protect migrating birds as they travel through Minneapolis

MPRB is also missing the opportunity to educate Minneapolis residents and park visitors about ecology and the need to limit recreation in some areas and reset peoplersquos expectations in order to preserve and enhance ecological function

Missing Native Trees and Vegetation - The draft Plan also misses the importance of native trees and vegetation to sustain insect populations and birds Human diversity is promoted but not bio-diversity The Plan erroneously states that ldquoTree removal is typically limited to instances of tree death public safety hazards or pest pressurerdquo (page 52) The fact is that many healthy mature trees are removed routinely for MPRB projects Recent examples include the removal of a small forest of trees in the Sculpture Garden for a meadow design over the objections of the Minneapolis Tree Advisory Commission even though those trees could have been part of the new system of storm water management Also the removal of many trees to build the Loppetrsquos Trailhead Center those trees have not been replaced despite State requirements to do so

Reduceeliminate planting of non-native trees shrubs and forbs in favor of native vegetation Use native trees (or adaptive trees migrating north due to climate change) to replace the tree canopy and eliminate non-native tree plantings where native or climate-change adaptive trees can survive

Limit tree removal to instances of tree death public safety hazards or pest pressure in non-natural areas In natural areas leave dead trees as wildlife habitat

Require no net loss of trees or green space from park projects

Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat ndash Identify areas of high wildlife value to be protected from recreation and high-impact human activities on all MPRB property

Packet Pg 177

Require a wildlife impact assessment for every MPRB project and require projects to minimize wildlife and habitat impacts In the assessment identify areas of high wildlife value to be protected from recreation and high-impact human activities

Enhance and expand habitat for wildlife throughout the Park system

Educate the public about the value and need for wildlife to ensure healthy ecosystems Minimize conflicts with wildlife not through eliminating the wildlife but by modifying human activities through this education and limiting access

Lighting Policy - The lighting policy should require all park buildings and lighting are safe for birds and other wildlife as well as humans The MPRB should work with the City of Minneapolis to ensure that this lighting policy is implemented throughout Minneapolis so that all buildings and lights are bird and wildlife friendly

VagueGeneral Recommendations - In general most of the recommendations are vague and non-committal and need to be strengthened Throughout the Plan opportunities to take action are missed too often the verbs are ldquoexplorerdquo ldquoevaluaterdquo ldquoplanrdquo and ldquocontinuerdquo rather than ldquoimplementrdquo ldquoenactrdquo ldquoact and ldquoinitiaterdquo In too many cases the Plan recommends more planning rather than taking action

Lack of recommendations to sustain bio-diversity and ecological function - The recommendations further reflect the focus on maximizing recreation vs protecting and optimizing ecological function

Other General Comments ndash

The Ecological Systems Plan must include statements commiting to bird-safe buildings and lighting on parkland

Require no net increase in storm water runoff from park projects

Specific Comments on Plan (Suggested change in red and italicized)

Chapter 1 Introduction to the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board MPRBrsquoS VISION ndash Theme 1 - Urban forests natural areas and waters that endure and captivate and support native plants animals and birds

MPRB STRUCTURE - Environmental Stewardship manages and maintains the built and natural spaces to support native plants animals and birds which means the majority of equipment used for their care is purchased by this department

CHAPTER 2 WATER Water Recommendations B Problems to address to build resiliency in the face of changing water levels 14 LAKE SHORE AND CREEK BANK EROSION CURRENT MPRB MITIGATION PRACTICES AND BMPS RECOMMENDATIONS 14 1 Additional bioengineering rip rap wall replacement to stabilize banks and shorelines There should be a greater emphasis on bioengineering verses rip rap wall replacement 17 LAKE AUGMENTATION CURRENT MPRB MITIGATION PRACTICES AND BMPS RECOMMENDATIONS 17 1 Park and lakeshore design for fluctuating water levels There should be a greater emphasis on use of native water plants or shore line plants

C Problems to address to protect aquatic habitat 18 AQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES

Packet Pg 178

18 AQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES CURRENT MPRB MITIGATION PRACTICES AND BMPS RECOMMENDATIONS 18 1 Develop an invasive Species Management Plan per Zebra Mussel Action Plan and Carp Management Study 18 2 Develop management plans for known invasive species not yet in the area 18 3 Continue prevention and early detection programs

CHAPTER 3 AIR Air Goals and Strategies D Contribute to improving air quality in the City Add New ndash Reduce amount of turf vegetation that requires mowing by 10 over all MPRB properties by replacing with no maintenance native plants annually for next 5 years E Contribute to climate change mitigation mdashContribute to urban heat island reduction through sustainability of the urban forest high albedo and green surfaces and improved shading Reduce amount of turf vegetation that requires mowing by 10 over all MPRB properties by replacing with no maintenance native plants annually for next 5 years POLICY

Development of a planting policy that guides the type and concentration of plant species that may be utilized utilizes native plants and guides the type and concentration of them in neighborhood and regional parks PROCEDURE As policy changes correspond to subsequent changes in procedure procedures pertaining to land managenotment purchasing and construction are important to explore Where appropriate By giving priority to shifting turf landscape to natural space incorporating native plants it will have a significant impact on air quality by utilizing the natural air polluting properties mitigation of plants and through eliminating mower emissions while also renotducing the cost of maintenancehellip

BIOCHAR a charcoal made from plant matter can be planted into the ground as one very cost-effecnottive method of sequestering carbon Because of its ability to simultaneously hold carbon and boost soil nutrients biochar should be explored for its potennottial to help the parks especially where vegetation is Great idea

PARK ACCESS

[Last paragraph] As MPRB seeks to meet goals related to policy procenotdure strategic partnerships park access and tracking it will be in the position to better identify opportunities for strategic shifts in planning and operations Note - While park access is an important goal a plan to limit access to potions of many parks should be implemented so that they are not ldquolovedrdquo to death and allow the peaceful coexistence of other life forms

Future Mitigations CARBON SEQUESTRATION PROTECT AND ENHANCE AREAS Currently MPRB has data reflecting tree hellip equipped to consider carbon sequesnottration potential in future projects Note - While carbon sequestration is a commendable goal it should take a secondary goal to providing an environment for quality green space that will benefit people animals and birds Providing green space that includes trees shrubs and native prairie plants park-wide will fulfill the sequestering secondary goal

Air Recommendations D Contribute to Improving the Air Quality in the City 25 CARBON DIOXIDE (CO2) RECOMMENDATIONS 2511 Use tracking data and asset management information to create efficient mowing plowing and work routes Note - Reduce amount of turf vegetation that requires mowing by 10 over all MPRB properties by replacing with no maintenance native plants annually for next 5 years

31 TREE CANOPY FRAGMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS

Packet Pg 179

RECOMMENDATIONS 311 Work with City of Minneapolis to draft a tree canopy preservation plan including a private tree policy that recommends using native trees and that requires homeowners to maintain existing canopy on a certain percentage of their property and a strategy for watering street trees near rented properties 312 NEW - Use native plants in planting plans (including 10 genera limit ) to encourage species diversity and maintain largest possible growing native trees in available growing space 72

CHAPTER 5 LIFE LIFE IN THE PARKS Minneapolis parks are hellip while fulfilling its mission to ldquopermanently preserve protect maintain improve and enhance its natural resources parkland and recreational opportunities for current and future generationsrdquo This includes limiting access to areas of some parks so that the parks are not ldquolovedrdquo to death Understanding that water air and land conditions have the biggest impacts on the plant animal and insect life within the parks this chapter considers what can be addressed in park operanottions that will help to mitigate these impacts resultinghellip

POLLINATOR HABITAT Case Study Snapshot Bee Lawn Benefits

At the same time the Bee Lab identified a few promising native plant species that could help enhance lawns including Calico aster (Symphotrichum lateriflorum) creeping thyme (Thymus serphyllum) self-heal (Prunella vulgarus ssp Lanceaolata) Note - Creeping thyme (Thymus serphyllum) is not native Self-heal (Prunella vulgarus ssp Lanceaolata) can be very invasive and hard to get rid of Calico aster is too tall to be classified as a turf vegetation

Packet Pg 180

In reference to 41 1 Increase technology capability in field to include definitions maps methods and standards for how natural areas are kept Map all natural surface trails in the park system and assess which meet recreational user needs and which should be closed to prevent environmental degradation

Be careful what trails are removed due to environmental degradation Who determines a certain trail is environmentally degrading Do they actually just not like the user that is using that trail Or do they believe that trail makes a park too busy or too developed Do they think that the trail is affecting wildlife Or the use is affecting wildlife

All sustainable natural surface trails in our system are currently mapped All other trails not constructed specifically as natural surface trails in the system are just rouge trails created by people or animals desiring to go to a destination

There is a different between what the MPRB dubs a natural surface trail (sustainably built) and a rouge trail

Rewrite to say Increase technology capability in field to include definitions maps methods and standards for how natural areas are kept Map all natural surface trails and rouge trails in the park system Assess which rough trails meet recreational user needs and which should be closed to prevent environmental degradation

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Friday April 19 2019 20753 PMFriday April 19 2019 20753 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Friday April 19 2019 22425 PMFriday April 19 2019 22425 PMTime SpentTime Spent 001631001631IP AddressIP Address 2088723320120887233201

Packet Pg 181

This plan is a welcome addition to our park system

Packet Pg 182

Kay Hansen

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Saturday April 20 2019 105736 AMSaturday April 20 2019 105736 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Saturday April 20 2019 105848 AMSaturday April 20 2019 105848 AMTime SpentTime Spent 000111000111IP AddressIP Address 664156128664156128

Packet Pg 183

Friends of Minneapolis Wildlife appreciates the opportunity to submit these comments on the draft MPRB Ecological Systems Plan As elected officials entrusted to be stewards of thousands of acres of land in the Minneapolis Park system your most important function is to preserve and protect the natural resources and ecological systems that are the foundation of our parkland and our environment and indeed the basis of Life As climate change proves sustainable recreation is not possible without a healthy environment This includes the wildlife who are an essential element of our urban ecosystem Yet too often recreation takes priority and displaces our natural resources and wildlife with adverse impacts on ecosystems As environmentalists and wildlife advocates we are disappointed in the draft Ecological Systems Plan The Plan summarizes MPRB current policies and practices but does not go far enough in describing ecological function and committing to policies and practices that will sustain and enhance ecological functions Throughout the Plan reflects a bias for recreation over ecology and the failure to focus on wildlife and ecological function Rather than focus on increasing services and amenities for humans at the expense of wildlife MPRB must prioritize the preservation and enhancement of wildlife habitat and the protection of species of wildlife who live in Minneapolis as well as birds migrating through Minneapolis The Plan seems to miss the essence of the lsquocycle-of-lifersquo and lsquofood-chainrsquo concepts at the core of ecological function This void is especially evident in the ldquoLiferdquo Chapter where the recommendations are high-level goals instead of the detailed action steps that are needed to enhance life throughout our park system In this era of the ldquosixth extinctionrdquo ldquostacked benefitsrdquo are not sufficient MPRB needs to prioritize the protection of wildlife and the expansion and enhancement of wildlife habitat and corridors In an era of climate change with devastating impacts on wildlife and ecological function we need a strong Plan that focuses on protecting and restoring our environment rather than a Plan that equivocates and shifts responsibility away from the Park Board MPRB can in fact commit to improve water quality based on factors that are under its immediate control such as MPRBrsquos own development projects on parkland and MPRB practices on parkland And MPRB can repair damage done to natural areas and restore those areas Yet these and other solid commitments are missing in the document The Plan also fails to correct the current mindset that wildlife is an inconvenience to be managed Other animals (including insects herptiles birds and mammals) are an essential part of our ecosystem and need to be cherished and protected rather than ignored or eradicated when they interfere with human recreation The Plan needs to go beyond justifying policies as meeting DNR requirementsmdash MPRB needs to value these species for their own sake and commit to welcome and protect these species no less than humans The Plan should also commit to educating Minneapolis residents and park visitors about ecology and the need to limit recreation in some areas and reset peoplersquos expectations in order to preserve and enhance ecological function Alarmingly the Plan does not ensure protections for millions of migrating birds who use the Mississippi Flyway twice a year despite the fact that most of the riverrsquos shore land is managed by the Park Board The Minneapolis Chain of LakesTheodore Wirth Park IBA includes the five lakes which comprise the Minneapolis Chain of Lakes (Cedar Lake Lake of the Isles Bde Maka Ska Lake Harriet and Brownie Lake) the Thomas Roberts Bird Sanctuary and Lakeview Cemetery along with Theodore Wirth Park including the Eloise Butler Wildflower Garden and Bird Sanctuary the Quaking Bog Birch Pond Wirth Lake the Bassets Creek pools and the JD Rivers Garden A total of 263 species of birds have been recorded within this IBA including 72 species of Conservation Concern The Ecological Systems Plan should explicitly address the importance of this entire area as an oasis of bird habitat in the larger urban area and should include concrete protections for this habitat that will prevent further threats to birds and other wildlife who depend on this area

Following are proposed recommendations to help fill the ldquowildliferdquo gap in the draft Plan 1 Prioritize the protection of wildlife throughout the Minneapolis Park system including natural areas neighborhood parks regional parks and any areas managed by MPRB 2 Educate the public about the value and inherent rights of all types of wildlife and the need for wildlife to ensure healthy ecosystems 3 Require a wildlife impact assessment for every MPRB project and require projects to minimize wildlife and habitat impacts 4 Plan and schedule high-impact MPRB activities (such as construction and tree removal) to avoid nesting and migration seasons 5 Enhance and expand habitat for wildlife throughout the Park system from natural areas to small areas such as boulevards 6 Protect areas of high wildlife value from high-impact human activities and human recreation other than nature observation or restoration 7 Include habitat areas with native trees and vegetation in all neighborhood parks 8 Modify the wildlife removalmanagement practices to prohibit killing of wildlife in favor of relocation or other humane methods

Packet Pg 184

9 Minimize conflicts with wildlife by modifying human activities through public education and limits on activities 10Implement a bird-safe building and lighting policy that requires all buildings and lighting on parkland to be safe for birds 11Work with the City of Minneapolis to ensure that all buildings and lights are bird friendly 12Increase native trees (or adaptive trees migrating north due to climate change) and tree canopy and eliminate non-native tree plantings where native or climate-change adaptive trees can survive 13Reduceeliminate planting of non-native shrubs and forbs in favor of native vegetation 14Prevent the flow of trash into waterways that threatens water quality and wildlife safety and habitat 15Limit tree removal to instances of tree death public safety hazards or pest pressure on parklands that are not considered natural areas in natural areas leave dead trees as wildlife habitat

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the draft Ecological Systems Plan

Sincerely Friends of Minneapolis Wildlife

Packet Pg 185

Leslie

How does Ecological System Plan interface with neighborhood park planning Do they relate share planning or are they separate I think they need to work together The park plans Irsquove studied indicate adding impervious areas and reducing green space due to adding structuresactivities that will require removing trees to gain space to fit all proposed activities

I am concerned about urban heat island effect I do not feel the city can afford to lose trees We have already lost too many to Dutch Elm and and now Emerald Ash borer

We will likely lose more trees and green space if 2040 plan for up zoning takes place In my neighborhood where four-plexes are currently there is no yard no shrubs and no trees no shade Builders have built out edge to edge alley to sidewalk This type of building will take a toll on neighborhoods decrease shade increase heat

We need to conserve as much green space in neighborhoods as possible Is there a way to encourage new build to include a tree or two

Is there a way to help homeowners and apartment owners to plant trees through grant money public education to facilitate maintaining green space

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Saturday May 04 2019 70729 PMSaturday May 04 2019 70729 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Saturday May 04 2019 75509 PMSaturday May 04 2019 75509 PMTime SpentTime Spent 004739004739IP AddressIP Address 6816817721068168177210

Packet Pg 186

I would like to see this Ecological planning info publicized more widely I just now learned of it through my May neighborhood newsletter None of my neighbors have heard of the Ecological Systems Plan

The neighborhood park planning was also not publicized sufficiently

Both ecological and park planning groups should consider information sharing there seems to be some crossover in topics particularly regarding tree canopy green space land use public education regarding ecological impact of proposed park activities

Packet Pg 187

Sean Connaughty

Build in adaptability in landscaping and management to incorporate beaver and other wildlife activity End the practice of trapping and killing of animals such as beaver or geese

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Wednesday May 08 2019 81504 AMWednesday May 08 2019 81504 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Wednesday May 08 2019 82106 AMWednesday May 08 2019 82106 AMTime SpentTime Spent 000601000601IP AddressIP Address 72502031837250203183

Packet Pg 188

letter sent to park commissioners by me on this topic I want to lay out my argument for leaving the beavers alone I also want to know what is the exact wording of the rule changes that were recently implemented by MPRB commissioners regarding trapping and killing of beavers If there is not specific language I suggest that it is needed to clarify this process Here is my understanding of the rule change as it was expressed to me Beavers will no longer be trapped for taking down trees (measures can easily be taken to protect curated trees) Beavers will only be trapped if they are causing flooding Trapping beavers out of fear of possible future flooding is actually no protection for them at all and can be construed to justify trapping and killing at any time 1 The beavers are not currently causing flooding The status of the beavers constructions has changed little over the past several years which can be proven by photo documentation 2 The beavers have been helpful for the ecology and water quality at Lake Hiawatha creating meanders and branchings in the delta area which has increased wetland function reduced sediment deposition in Lake Hiawatha and they have thinned out the volunteer maple tree forest in the delta they also feed on the numerous volunteer willow saplings keeping them in control 3 The biodiversity of this location is important both to the community and the health of this ecosystem Neighbors and the community value the wildlife including the beavers and will be angered by the trapping and killing of animals here Resident otters muskrat and mink are also at risk of being killed by this proposed trapping 4 The golf course space is shared with a critical natural ecological system This park needs to serve the needs not only of recreational golfers but should also be stewards of the land and water and by its proximity to this critical habitat and watershed Park staff must serve the ecology as well as golf We need to adapt more holistic approaches that do a lot less damage to our water and ecosystems than we have historically 5 The location of this spot of concern at Hole 12 may be more a function of debris being caught in this location than the construction of beavers When park staff cut down several trees in this location on April 2016 they did not remove the felled trees but allowed them to remain in the water at this location One year later this obstruction was exacerbated by more debris being captured from the flow of the Creek including a couch Currently the couch still remains embedded in this location and I have notified Park staff of this back in 2017 It is too heavy for me to remove As you know a lot of debris comes down the Creek including innumerable logs branches and apparently a couch I will happily assist in removing debris that I can manage At the next opportunity I will visit the location via kayak From my last visit to the location on Saturday Creek flow appeared to be unchanged from what it has been As the MPRB volunteer steward of Lake Hiawatha I have maintained and monitored this location closely for the past 5 years I am not currently concerned about additional flooding caused by beaver activity in this location at this time Our current flooding concerns are more a result of upstream wetland loss and climate change My suggestions for going forward is to adopt a policy that prioritizes ecological and ecosystem health to encourage the adaptability and biological success of our ecosystem for the benefit of biodiversity recreationand downstream water quality

Packet Pg 189

Francine Marie Tolf

I want to urge the Park Board and City to protect wildlife in our parks and open spaces and to make their needs a priority

For example do not kill beavers at a golf course Do not round up a family of Canada geese at a park

The habitat of so many animals is shrinking and shrinking because of human beings Surely in these limited spaces we can and must work to share space with animals

Packet Pg 190

Jaden Hansen

I am increasingly more alarmed at the Park Boards seeming hostility towards wildlife in the parks Is appreciation for nature and wildlife not why we go to the park I may go to picnic and throw a frisbee but I also go so that my daughter can learn the difference between a goose and duck and can learn the thrill of having a wild animal come close enough to check us out The cat tails the beavers the geese the squirrels are all part of the enjoyment and frankly why I go to a city park instead of a school playground which also has grass

The wildness needs to be allowed to flourish we need to instill in our youth an appreciation for ecological diversity and learn how to live with it We have been a nation of people that conquer nature and now in 2019 we are on the brink of losing bees and other contributions to bio diversity To eradicate control decrease any of these is radically out of sync with who we need to be as a community We know better in Minneapolis than to use pesticides round up animals and remove native plants This an opportunity for the park to show how Minneapolis is leading in this area Put up some signs that talk about why the water is different this year--see how the beaver put its dam in this section this year this is how all the plant life around it is effected Create curriculum to share with youth camps and schools

Packet Pg 191

This is shameful to see such a plan introduced in Minneapolis in 2019 As a 40 year resident of Minneapolis I want my tax dollars to go to efforts that promote bio diversity and are cognizant of the world we live in 2019 Find dynamic and creative ways to coexist To do otherwise is out of touch and has raised enough attention that the votes will soon follow and only those who promote bio diversity will be voted onto the park board I for one am way more tuned in--because of this plan-- and intend to organize and advocate for making wildlife a priority

Packet Pg 192

Audrey

I want wildlife living on Minneapolis park land to be protected I want wildlife needs prioritized

Value wildlife

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Wednesday May 08 2019 84617 AMWednesday May 08 2019 84617 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Wednesday May 08 2019 12431 PMWednesday May 08 2019 12431 PMTime SpentTime Spent 043814043814IP AddressIP Address 1731601193817316011938

Packet Pg 193

Sigrid

Wildlife is a precious resource and must be protected and nurtured so it can be maintained for many years to come My personal observations of how Loring Parkrsquos animals and their habitat has been treated is very dismaying Our geese population was killed in the most inhumane way by an approved contractor of the Park Board This policy and the contractor must be changed Our squirrels are in real danger by aggressive dogs that are off leash with owners that enjoy seeing the ldquochase and injurydeathrdquo of the animals No effort is being made by park personnel or police to stop this practice The water of the ponds is polluted with lead and other chemicals effecting the health of fowl and fish Algae blooms and spreads out throughout the whole season

Stop the use of hazardous chemicals such as ldquoRound-uprdquo

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Wednesday May 08 2019 31613 PMWednesday May 08 2019 31613 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Wednesday May 08 2019 34217 PMWednesday May 08 2019 34217 PMTime SpentTime Spent 002604002604IP AddressIP Address 10742371531074237153

Packet Pg 194

Maggie OConnor

Parks have two function human recreation and protection of wildlife The latter is particularly important in dense urban areas where concrete lighting noise and lack of natural resources like food and shelter threaten both migratory wildlife and wildlife that is in Minnesota year around The goals in this section are admirable but seem to give highest priority to recreation Even when wildlife is addressed the goals are sweeping when the key lies in the details of how the goals will be met I nearly wrote how the goals will be executed because the killing of all the geese in Loring Park last summer is on my mind Looking at this section there is mention of managing excessively high populations of a given species - but the killing last year was uncalled for and overdone given small number of geese families at the time

The same issue arose at Loring a couple years ago with the plan to eliminate the invasive cattails - my reading suggests this has been deemed an almost impossible task (DNR) and the net effect to date at Loring has been to decimate the red-wing blackbird population and increase algal blooms (already a large bloom was present in the north lake when I was in the Park last Saturday - extraordinarily early and raises the concern of the lakes being really nasty by late August)

In sum the plan still seems overwhelmingly to view the parks as a commodity an it to be used for our pleasure rather than as a gift A gift is viewed as precious as it is not modified to our fleeting tastes as to which species are special which should be cleared out Compare a campaign flyer - good info nothing to save Contrast this to a friends or childs drawing - something to be treasured to make space for to protect and love without correction

I would suggest a full-time Wildlife Advocate for the parks an ecologist with a passion for urban wildlife

Packet Pg 195

You mention that park goers often dont see the bigger picture - and I agree Ive seen dogs chasing geese in several parks owners laughing and encouraging them Ive seen people dropping cigarettes in the lakes throwing dog-poop bags into the sewer grates

But some park goers are very knowledgeable about the ecology and wildlife in the parks they frequent - and it seems these voices are not respected

Packet Pg 196

Please keep wildlife and protect it Which means they share our spaces and no pesticide use

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Thursday May 09 2019 95459 AMThursday May 09 2019 95459 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Thursday May 09 2019 95739 AMThursday May 09 2019 95739 AMTime SpentTime Spent 000239000239IP AddressIP Address 65128185226512818522

Packet Pg 197

Donna Dralle

Please consider the effect your plans have on the wildlife We need them They have too much pressure on them as it is which affects their survival The ecosystem needs them to be healthy

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Thursday May 09 2019 84723 PMThursday May 09 2019 84723 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Thursday May 09 2019 85030 PMThursday May 09 2019 85030 PMTime SpentTime Spent 000307000307IP AddressIP Address 1312122488313121224883

Packet Pg 198

Rachel Augusta

1 Prioritize the protection of wildlife throughout the Minneapolis Park system including natural areas neighborhood parks regional parks and any areas managed by MPRB 2 Educate the public about the value and inherent rights of all types of wildlife and the need for wildlife to ensure healthy ecosystems 3 Require a wildlife impact assessment for every MPRB project and require projects to minimize wildlife and habitat impacts 4 Plan and schedule high-impact MPRB activities (such as construction and tree removal) to avoid nesting and migration seasons 5 Enhance and expand habitat for wildlife throughout the Park system from natural areas to small areas such as boulevards 6 Protect areas of high wildlife value from high-impact human activities and human recreation other than nature observation or restoration 7 Include habitat areas with native trees and vegetation in all neighborhood parks 8 Modify the wildlife removalmanagement practices to prohibit the killing of wildlife in favor of relocation or other humane methods 9 Minimize conflicts with wildlife by modifying human activities through public education and limits on activities 10 Implement a bird-safe building and lighting policy that requires all buildings and lighting on parkland to be safe for birds 11 Work with the City of Minneapolis to ensure that all buildings and lights are bird friendly 12 Increase native trees (or adaptive trees migrating north due to climate change) and tree canopy and eliminate non-native tree plantings where native or climate-change adaptive trees can survive 13 Reduceeliminate planting of non-native shrubs and forbs in favor of native vegetation 14 Prevent the flow of trash into waterways that threatens water quality and wildlife safety and habitat 15 Limit tree removal to instances of tree death public safety hazards or pest pressure on parklands that are not considered natural areas in natural areas leave dead trees as wildlife habitat

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Friday May 10 2019 42104 PMFriday May 10 2019 42104 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Friday May 10 2019 42313 PMFriday May 10 2019 42313 PMTime SpentTime Spent 000209000209IP AddressIP Address 6722011467220114

Packet Pg 199

The Plan does not ensure protections for millions of migrating birds who use the Mississippi Flyway twice a year despite the fact that most of the riverrsquos shoreland including the Minneapolis Chain of Lakes IBA is managed by the Park Board A total of 263 species of birds have been recorded within this IBA including 72 species of Conservation Concern The Ecological Systems Plan should explicitly address the importance of this entire area as an oasis of bird habitat in the larger urban area and should include concrete protections for this habitat that will prevent further threats to birds and other wildlife who depend on this area

Packet Pg 200

Leslie

This plan overall does not create AUTHENTIC space for wildilfe--not in natural areas neighborhood parks regional parks and any areas managed by MPRB We MUST do more in this era of rapidly diminishing wildlife habitat intense human development The paradigm needs to shift This is also good for humans We need to be smart in how we manage our parks

1 Educate the public about the value and inherent rights of all types of wildlife and the need for wildlife to ensure healthy ecosystems 2 Require a wildlife impact assessment for EVERY SINGLE MPRB project and require projects to minimize wildlife and habitat impacts 3 Plan and schedule high-impact MPRB activities (such as construction and tree removal) to avoid nesting and migration seasons 4 Enhance and expand habitat for wildlife throughout the Park system from natural areas to small areas such as boulevards 5 Protect areas of high wildlife value from high-impact human activities and human recreation other than nature observation or restoration 6 Include habitat areas with native trees and vegetation in all neighborhood parks Native wildlife need native vegetation to survive 7 Modify the wildlife removalmanagement practices to prohibit killing of wildlife in favor of relocation or other humane methods 8 Minimize conflicts with wildlife by modifying human activities through public education and limits on activities 9 Implement a bird-safe building and lighting policy that requires all buildings and lighting on parkland to be safe for birds 10 Work with the City of Minneapolis to ensure that all buildings and lights are bird friendly 11 Increase native trees (or adaptive trees migrating north due to climate change) and tree canopy and eliminate non-native tree plantings where native or climate-change adaptive trees can survive 12 Reduceeliminate planting of non-native shrubs and forbs in favor of native vegetation 13 Prevent the flow of trash into waterways that threatens water quality and wildlife safety and habitat 14 Limit tree removal to instances of tree death public safety hazards or pest pressure on parklands that are not considered natural areas in natural areas leave dead trees as wildlife habitat 15 Do not locate dog parks near waterbodies The Mississippi River does not need more pet waste in it

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Saturday May 11 2019 85602 AMSaturday May 11 2019 85602 AMLast ModifiedLast Modified Saturday May 11 2019 91411 AMSaturday May 11 2019 91411 AMTime SpentTime Spent 001808001808IP AddressIP Address 738814217738814217

Packet Pg 201

Nature centered design promotes the health of both humans and wildlifeBut that design needs to be authentic

Packet Pg 202

Constance Pepin

The Life section fails to merge the previous sections on air water land into an ecological (vs fragmented) approach and therefore fails to address Life itself The draft Plan is fails to acknowledge the necessity of protecting wildlife in our Park system and to specify concrete actions to preserve and enhance ecological function through our Park system Without pollinators birds and other non-human animals ecological function (and Life itself) cannot be sustained Yet the Plan does not take concrete steps to protect (vs manage) wildlife Other animals have just as much right to live here as humans yet humans continue to reduce habitat and displace other animals merely for recreation that diminishes Nature and natural resources The draft Plan seems to continue outdated policies and practices rather than present new policies based on the necessity to cherish and protect wildlife

With respect to Life an obvious flaw in the Plan is the failure to acknowledge MPRBrsquos responsibility to protect migrating birds The plan incorrectly describes the IBA which is not just Roberts Bird Sanctuary The Minneapolis Chain of LakesTheodore Wirth Park IBA includes the five lakes which comprise the Minneapolis Chain of Lakes Cedar Lake (173 acres) Lake of the Isles (118 a) Lake Calhoun (422 a) Lake Harriet (343 a) and Brownie Lake the Thomas Roberts Bird Sanctuary and Lakeview Cemetery along with Theodore Wirth Park including the Eloise Butler Wildflower Garden and Bird Sanctuary the Quaking Bog Birch Pond Wirth Lake the Bassets Creek pools and the JD Rivers Childrens Garden A total of 263 species of birds have been recorded within thus IBA including 72 species of Conservation Concern Yet the Plan does not specify basic protections for birds such as birdsafe buildings on park land and pollinator-friendly landscaping to supply the insects that birds need to survive

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Sunday May 12 2019 42908 PMSunday May 12 2019 42908 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Sunday May 12 2019 53732 PMSunday May 12 2019 53732 PMTime SpentTime Spent 010823010823IP AddressIP Address 725019274725019274

Packet Pg 203

The draft Plan seems written for years ago before the current crises became evident We need an Ecological Systems Plan that embraces a paradigm shift away from a focus on recreation toward a focus on ecology including wildlife Every patch of existing habitat for birds and other wildlife is important to protect and preserve Humans cannot continue to maximize their use of the land at the expense of wildlife Instead humans have to change behavior and expectations and MPRB must show leadership in educating humans and prioritizing the environment

Many articles are sounding the alarm about the mass extinction of a million species Herersquos just one that states the ldquoCurrent assault on nature is threatening human survival - transformative change is neededrdquo httpswwwbirdlifeorgworldwidenewsE2809Ccurrent-assault-nature-threatening-human-survival-transformative-change-neededE2809D

The world will not end if humans cannot do everything they want to do in a park but the world as we know it will end unless humans step up to sustain and enhance ecological function Yet instead of stepping up in the Plan MPRB equivocates and says how hard it is to restore the environment Hard yes impossible no Please revise the document so that it truly is an Ecological Systems Plan

Packet Pg 204

Carmine Profant

This plan does not ensure protections for millions of migrating birds who use the Mississippi Flyway twice a year despite the fact that most of the riverrsquos shore land including the Minneapolis Chain of Lakes IBA is managed by the Park Board A total of 263 species of birds have been recorded within this IBA including 72 species of Conservation Concern The Ecological Systems Plan should explicitly address the importance of this entire area as an oasis of bird habitat in the larger urban area and should include concrete protections for this habitat that will prevent further threats to birds and other wildlife who depend on this area

Please implement policies and practices that sustain and expand wildlife habitat and biodiversity For many decades human recreation has taken precedence over ecology in our parks and wildlife is often seen as an inconvenience to remove rather than necessary and integral to our environment I urge the MPRB to make our Minneapolis Park system friendly to wildlife with birdsafe buildings pollinator-friendly native plantings and extremely limited use of chemicals

CollectorCollector Web Link 1 Web Link 1 (Web Link)(Web Link)StartedStarted Monday May 13 2019 82031 PMMonday May 13 2019 82031 PMLast ModifiedLast Modified Monday May 13 2019 82928 PMMonday May 13 2019 82928 PMTime SpentTime Spent 000857000857IP AddressIP Address 17420181601742018160

Packet Pg 205

Here are some ways you can fill the wildlife gap in the draft plan

1 Prioritize the protection of wildlife throughout the Minneapolis Park system including natural areas neighborhood parks regional parks and any areas managed by MPRB 2 Educate the public about the value and inherent rights of all types of wildlife and the need for wildlife to ensure healthy ecosystems 3 Require a wildlife impact assessment for every MPRB project and require projects to minimize wildlife and habitat impacts 4 Plan and schedule high-impact MPRB activities (such as construction and tree removal) to avoid nesting and migration seasons 5 Enhance and expand habitat for wildlife throughout the Park system from natural areas to small areas such as boulevards 6 Protect areas of high wildlife value from high-impact human activities and human recreation other than nature observation or restoration 7 Include habitat areas with native trees and vegetation in all neighborhood parks 8 Modify the wildlife removalmanagement practices to prohibit killing of wildlife in favor of relocation or other humane methods 9 Minimize conflicts with wildlife by modifying human activities through public education and limits on activities 10 Implement a bird-safe building and lighting policy that requires all buildings and lighting on parkland to be safe for birds 11 Work with the City of Minneapolis to ensure that all buildings and lights are bird friendly 12 Plant only trees native to Minnesota (or adaptive native trees migrating north due to climate change) and increase the tree canopy Eliminate exotic and non-native tree plantings where native or climate-change adaptive trees can survive 13 Limit tree removal to instances of tree death public safety hazards or pest pressure on parklands that are not considered natural areas in natural areas leave dead trees as wildlife habitat 14 Eliminate the planting of non-native shrubs and forbs in favor of native vegetation 15 Prevent the flow of trash into waterways that threatens water quality and wildlife safety and habitat

Packet Pg 206

From City of Minneapolis Community Environmental Advisory Commission To Minneapolis Park amp Recreation Board Mississippi Watershed Management Organization Copied City of Minneapolis Sustainability Division Date April 18 2019 Subject MPRB Ecological System Plan Dear Minneapolis Park amp Recreation Board The Community Environmental Advisory Commission (ldquoCEACrdquo) supports the Draft MPRB Ecological System Plan and recommends amendments as outlined below The plan is broad multifaceted and well-researched If implemented it will clearly have a dramatic and lasting impact on the local environment within the City of Minneapolis Especially as the City of Minneapolis begins thinking about a resolution on biochar we appreciate that the MPRB is considering its use There are however some missed opportunities that CEAC recommends as amendments to the Ecological System Plan

Add a commitment to refrain from using neonicotinoid-based pesticides anywhere within the Minneapolis park system

Add a plan to increase acreage of pollinator friendly habitats within the Minneapolis park system beyond just exploring opportunities to transition general park turf to lower mow areas or alternative land covers

Add a commitment to planting milkweed in all pollinator friendly habitats due to Minnesotarsquos global significance to the Monarch butterflyrsquos breeding grounds and flight paths

Add educational outreach and awareness campaigns focused on the affordability of maintaining pollinator friendly habitats and the accompanying benefits to wildlife and airsoilwater quality

In addition to rain gardens stormwater ponds naturalized shorelines permeable pavers grit chambers and sedimentation basins add ldquocommunity gardensrdquo as another way to decrease runoff

Thank you for your time and consideration of our support and recommended amendments If you have questions please contact the Chair of the Pollinator Friendly Habitats and Food Systems subcommittee of CEAC Jason Alvey Respectfully Erin Niehoff Chair On behalf of the Community Environmental Advisory Commission

Packet Pg 207

Resolution 2020-288

Resolution Approving Temporary Occupancy Under Section 4(F) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966 for the CSAH 5 (Franklin Ave) at Chicago Ave 2021 Highway

Safety Improvement Project a Portion of Which is Within Peavey Park

Whereas The Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board (MPRB) was created by the Minnesota Legislature in April 1883 and has the authority to manage and operate park facilities Whereas The City of Minneapolis and Hennepin County are preparing plans for the CSAH 5 (Franklin Avenue) at Chicago Avenue 2021 Highway Safety Improvements Project (HSIP) along Franklin Avenue between Chicago Avenue and Columbus Avenue in Minneapolis MN Whereas The purpose of the HSIP project is to enhance pedestrian safety and make Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) improvements of existing sidewalk ramps work that includes installation of curb extensions signal replacement installation of pedestrian countdown timers curb and gutter improvements the construction of a pedestrian refuge and restriping of CSAH 5 (Franklin Avenue) for a single lane of travel in each direction along with restriping of the intersection for dedicated turn lanes Whereas ADA pedestrian ramp upgrades and crossings are proposed on Franklin Avenue within the boundaries of Peavey Park which is a resource subject to Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966 USC 303 because the project will be funded using a combination of federal and state funds Whereas The Minneapolis Park amp Recreation Board was determined to be the Agency with Jurisdiction over the parkland that will be potentially impacted by this project Whereas A nationwide programmatic determination called a temporary occupancy can be utilized in lieu of a full 4(f) impact review for bikeways and walkways Whereas A temporary occupancy is only valid when the Agency with Jurisdiction over the Section 4(f) property has given approval in writing that the project is acceptable and consistent with the designated use of the property and that all possible planning to minimize harm has been accomplished in the location and design of the bikeway or walkway facility Whereas MPRB staff have reviewed the proposed project and believe it will benefit park users and have minimal impact on existing parkland and Whereas This resolution is supported by the MPRB 2007-2020 Comprehensive Plan which envisions ldquoDynamic parks that shape city character and meet diverse community needsrdquo and

Packet Pg 208

ldquoParks are safe and welcoming by designrdquo RESOLVED That the Board of Commissioners approves a temporary occupancy under Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966 for the CSAH 5 (Franklin Avenue) at Chicago Avenue 2021 Highway Safety Improvement Project a portion of which is within Peavey Park and RESOLVED That the President of the Board and Secretary to the Board are authorized to take all necessary administrative actions to implement this resolution

Packet Pg 209

TO Planning Committee FROM Michael Schroeder DATE August 19 2020 SUBJECT Resolution Approving Temporary Occupancy Under Section 4(F) of the Department of

Transportation Act of 1966 for the CSAH 5 (Franklin Ave) at Chicago Ave 2021 Highway Safety Improvement Project a Portion of Which is Within Peavey Park

BACKGROUND This resolution an considers agreement with a temporary occupancy determination under Section 4(f) of the Transportation Act of 1966 for the CSAH 5 (Franklin Avenue) at Chicago Avenue 2021 Highway Safety Improvement Project (Attachment A) A temporary occupancy is an alternative to a full-scale 4(f) evaluation and can be considered for walkway and bikeway projects in parks where impacts are extremely minimal In order for the project to proceed the temporary occupancy must be approved by MPRB Hennepin County (County) and the City of Minneapolis are preparing plans for the CSAH 5 (Franklin Ave) at Chicago Avenue 2021 Highway Safety Improvements Project (HSIP) The project includes intersections along CSAH 5 (Franklin Avenue) at MSAS 165 (Chicago Avenue) and Columbus Avenue Project components include Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) improvements of existing sidewalk ramps installation of curb extensions signal replacement installation of pedestrian countdown timers curb and gutter work the construction of a pedestrian refuge and restriping of CSAH 5 (Franklin Avenue) for a single lane of travel in each direction along with restriping of the intersection for dedicated turn lanes Some work is expected to occur outside of the existing right‐of‐way to match the sidewalk to existing store fronts and entrances Additionally minor regrading Peavey Park is necessary to accommodate the work The Hennepin County CSAH 5 (Franklin Avenue) at Chicago Avenue project will not convert any park land to nonrecreational use and the area will be returned to its natural state within a reasonable period of time Two areas within Peavey Park require temporary occupancy (as displayed on Figure 1 of Attachment A) The two locations are at the intersections of CSAH 5 and Columbus Avenue and the southwest corner of CSAH 5 and Chicago Avenue At the mid‐block sidewalk ramp across from Columbus Avenue and south of CSAH 5 (Franklin Avenue) the County will replace existing sidewalk into Peavey Park to meet ADA standards A temporary easement will be necessary for grading to improve the existing slope of the intra‐park trail and reconstruction of the sidewalk

Packet Pg 210

south of CSAH 5 (Franklin Avenue) and for a short distance into Peavey Park Temporary occupancy is also needed near the southwest corner of CSAH 5 and Chicago Avenue to meet ADA standards These improvements include in‐kind sidewalk replacement and improvements to the southbound D‐Line platform such as curb extensions and passenger amenities Improvements at the northeast corner of Peavey Park previously received Section 4(f) temporary occupancy concurrence through an MPRB Board of Commissioners resolution on September 12 2018 These new improvements need to be included in Hennepin Countyrsquos CSAH 5 (Franklin Avenue) at Chicago Avenue 2021 Highway Safety Improvements Project Memorandum These improvements are in coordination with the D Line rapid bus project As per the Federal Register Rules and Regulations 23 CFR 77413(d) grading and sidewalk reconstruction to meet ADA requirements may be considered a temporary occupancy of Section 4(f) lands The proposed project will result in temporary occupancy of the existing Peavey Park a Section 4(f) resource managed by the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board (MPRB) The Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board (MPRB) as owner of the property upon which the work is proposed is the Agency with Jurisdiction The City of Minneapolis has consulted with MPRB staff and the federal agency and upon careful consideration MPRB staff have determined that the project does not have negative park impacts RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of Commissioners approve a temporary occupancy under Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966 for the CSAH 5 (Franklin Avenue) at Chicago Avenue 2021 Highway Safety Improvement Project a portion of which is within Peavey Park This action is supported by the following vision and goal statements in the MPRB 2007-2020 Comprehensive Plan Vision Theme 3 Dynamic parks that shape city character and meet diverse community

Goal Park facility renewal and development respects history and focuses on sustainability accessibility flexibility and beauty

Vision Theme 4 A safe place to play celebrate contemplate and recreate

Packet Pg 211

Goal Parks are safe and welcoming by design ATTACHMENTS

bull Attachment A- Franklin Avenue at Peavey Park Temporary Occupancy Letter (PDF)

Prepared By Carrie Christensen Senior Planner Strategic Planning Review Cindy Anderson Completed 08052020 942 AM Adam Arvidson Completed 08082020 1121 AM Michael Schroeder Completed 08092020 1015 AM Jennifer Ringold Completed 08092020 901 PM Al Bangoura Completed 08112020 1216 PM Planning Committee Pending 08192020 540 PM

Packet Pg 212

Hennepin County Transportation Project Delivery Public Works Facility 1600 Prairie Drive Medina MN 55340 612-596-0300 | hennepinus

July 24 2020 Carrie Christensen Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board 2117 West River Road N Minneapolis MN 55411 Subject State Project 027‐605‐030

CSAH 5 (Franklin Ave) at Chicago Ave 2021 HSIP Improvements Section 4(f) Temporary Occupancy of Peavey Park

Dear Ms Christensen Hennepin County (County) and the City of Minneapolis are preparing plans for the CSAH 5 (Franklin Ave) at Chicago Ave 2021 Highway Safety Improvements Project (HSIP) The project includes intersections along CSAH 5 (Franklin Ave) at MSAS 165 (Chicago Ave) and Columbus Ave Project components include Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) improvements of existing sidewalk ramps and installation of curb extensions signal replacement and installation of pedestrian countdown timers curb and gutter work the construction of a pedestrian refuge and restriping of CSAH 5 (Franklin Ave) for a single lane of travel in each direction along with restriping of the intersection for dedicated turn lanes Some work is expected to occur outside of the existing right‐of‐way to match the sidewalk to existing store fronts and entrances Additionally minor regrading to improve slope and sidewalk improvements are needed to meet ADA requirements within parkland to the south of CSAH 5 The proposed project will result in temporary occupancy of the existing Peavey Park a Section 4(f) resource managed by the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board (MPRB) Peavey Park is a Section 6(f) resource due to receiving grant restricted funding The Hennepin County CSAH 5 (Franklin Ave) at Chicago Ave project will not convert any land to nonrecreational use the area will be returned to its natural state within a reasonable period of time therefore Section 6(f) federal approval does not apply Coordination with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR) is attached Two areas within Peavey Park require temporary occupancy as displayed on Figure 1 The two locations are at the intersections of CSAH 5 and Columbus Ave and the southwest corner of CSAH 5 and Chicago Ave At the mid‐block sidewalk ramp across from Columbus Ave and south of CSAH 5 (Franklin Ave) the County will replace existing sidewalk into Peavey Park to meet ADA standards a temporary easement will need to be obtained from MPRB This temporary easement will be necessary for grading to improve the existing slope of the intra‐park trail and reconstruction for the sidewalk south of CSAH 5 (Franklin Ave) and for a short distance into Peavey Park (see Figure 1) Temporary occupancy is needed near the southwest corner of CSAH 5 and Chicago Ave to meet ADA

Packet Pg 213

2 of 3

standards These improvements include in‐kind sidewalk replacement and improvements to the southbound D‐Line platform such as curb extensions and passenger amenities Improvements at the northeast corner of Peavey Park previously received Section 4(f) temporary occupancy concurrence on September 17 2018 and MPRB Board of Commissioners resolution on September 12 2018 These improvements need to be included in Hennepin Countyrsquos CSAH 5 (Franklin Ave) at Chicago Ave 2021 Highway Safety Improvements Project Memorandum These improvements are in coordination with the D Line rapid bus project As per the Federal Register Rules and Regulations 23 CFR 77413(d) grading and sidewalk reconstruction to meet ADA requirements may be considered a temporary occupancy of Section 4(f) lands A temporary occupancy may not constitute a Section 4(f) use when all of the conditions listed below are satisfied

The duration of the occupancy will be temporary in nature (ie less than the time needed for the construction of the project)

The CSAH 5 (Franklin Ave) at Chicago Ave 2021 HSIP Improvements project is anticipated to be completed in one construction season The duration of work within the MPRB owned property is anticipated to be used for less than the time needed for construction of the project in its entirety The property will be used for grading for slope improvement and sidewalk reconstruction to meet ADA standards

There will be no change in ownership of the land No permanent right‐of‐way will be acquired from the MPRB A temporary easement will be necessary for the temporary grading and sidewalk reconstruction south of CSAH 5 in the north central portion and northeastern corner of Peavey Park

The scope of work to be performed will be minor (ie both the nature and magnitude of the changes to the Section 4(f) property are minimal)

The proposed project includes grading for slope improvements and associated sidewalk reconstruction within the north‐central and northeastern portions of Peavey Park which tie into the east‐west running sidewalk south of CSAH 5 (Franklin Ave) The temporary easement location is adjacent to CSAH 5 (Franklin Ave) right‐of‐way

The total temporary easement area will affect approximately 1374 square feet of Peavey Park (1058 square feet within the north‐central portion and 316 square feet in the northeastern portion) as presented in Figure 2 Figure 3 depicts a representative typical (cross) section of the existing and proposed sidewalk

There are no anticipated permanent adverse physical impacts The proposed slope improvements and sidewalk reconstruction locations are not anticipated to result in any adverse physical impact to Peavey Park The temporary easement locations south of CSAH 5 (Franklin Ave) currently contain a sidewalk that does not meet ADA standards Any exposed soil will be returned to manicured lawn

Packet Pg 214

3 of 3

There will be no interference with the activities or purpose of the resource (either temporary or permanent)

The temporary easement and proposed slope improvements will not affect any recreation uses or facilities of Peavey Park Peavey Park will remain open and accessible during the CSAH 5 (Franklin Ave) at Chicago Ave 2021 HSIP Improvements project

The land being used will be fully restored to a condition that is at least as good as the condition that existed prior to the project

The temporary easement area will be restored to its pre‐construction condition Currently the sidewalk ramp north of Peavey Park and connecting to an existing sidewalk within Peavey Park is not ADA compliant Additionally the sidewalk in the northeastern corner of the park has settled significantly and requires improvement The temporary easement along CSAH 5 (Franklin Ave) will accommodate grading to improve the existing slope and sidewalk improvements to meet ADA standards The planned sidewalk provides ADA compliant accessibility to the surrounding neighborhood and park

Please review the attached figures and indicate your concurrence that the proposed work constitutes a temporary occupancy by signing below If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact me at your earliest convenience Sincerely Tim Bruers Hennepin County Engineer Project Owner I concur that the proposed work constitutes a Temporary Occupancy of the 4(F) Peavey Park property as described above __________________________________________ __ ______________________ Carrie Christensen Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board Date Attachments Section 6(f) Correspondence from the MnDNR Figure 1 Project Location Figure 2 Temporary Occupancy Figure 3 Typical Section CC Cody Christianson ndash Bolton amp Menk Inc

Packet Pg 215

Gina Aulwes

From Moua Mai N (DNR) ltmainmouastatemnusgt

Sent Friday July 24 2020 853 AM

To Gina Aulwes

Subject RE Section 6(f) of Peavey Park in Hennepin County

Hello Gina

The temporary easement does not require federal approval so long as the recreation facilities are not

disturbed and the area will be returned to its natural state within a reasonable period of time

Mai Neng

Mai Neng Moua

Grants Specialist Coordinator | Parks and Trails

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources

500 Lafayette Road

St Paul MN 55155-4039

Phone 651-259-5638

Email mainmouastatemnus

mndnrgov

From Gina Aulwes ltGinaAulwesbolton-menkcomgt

Sent Thursday July 23 2020 533 PM

To Moua Mai N (DNR) ltmainmouastatemnusgt

Subject Section 6(f) of Peavey Park in Hennepin County

Hi Mai Neng

I am working for Hennepin County on a project that requires temporary easements from Peavey Park in Minneapolis

Peavey Park is listed as a granted funded park by the DNR I believe we do not need to go through the Section 6(f)

process since we are only needing temporary easements totaling approximately 1366 square feet of area in two

locations within Peavey Park We are replacing existing sidewalk to be ADA compliance with improvements at the

intersections and matching the grade

I will be documenting Peavey Park as a Section 6(f) resource that does not constitute ldquouserdquo due to the temporary nature

of the work Do you agree I have attached a figure of the park and the temporary occupancy areas

This message may be from an external email source Do not select links or open attachments unless verified Report all suspicious emails to Minnesota IT Services Security Operations Center

Packet Pg 216

Thanks

Gina M Aulwes

Environmental Specialist

Bolton amp Menk Inc

12224 Nicollet Avenue

Burnsville MN 55337-1649

Mobile 612-390-1150

Bolton-Menkcom

Packet Pg 217

GVWX33

22nd Street East

21st Street EastCh

Franklin Avenue East

19th Street East

Elliot

Peavey Park

erver1

klinFi

oject_

xd | D

ate Sa

LegendI

Construction LimitsParcelsParks

0 200Feet

Source Hennepin County MnDOT

CSAH 5 (Franklin Ave) at Chicago Ave 2021 HSIP ImprovementsHennepin County MN

Figure 1 Project LocationJune 2020

Packet Pg 218

amp(94amp(35W

amp(94 )12 )52

21st Street East

18th Street East

19th Street East

10th A

Interstate 35W

22nd Street East

Elliot

Interstate 94

RampCo

s Aven

Peavey Park

Figure 1 Temporary OccupancyJuly 2020

erver1

klin11

klin_4

f_6f_I

xd | D

ate Sa

LegendI

Construction LimitsProposed LineworkStudy Area

6f BoundaryParksParcels

0 200Feet Source Hennepin County MnDOT Nearmap

Peavey Park0 50Feet

Peavey Park

0 50Feet

Packet Pg 219

TYPICAL SECTIONS

PEAVEY PARK

PEAVEY PARK - EXISTING SECTION

PEAVEY PARK - PROPOSED SECTION

bmitbl

T47119807

ures119807_ts_02d

6302020

VARVAR

Packet Pg 220

Resolution 2020-289

Resolution Approving Operations and Maintenance Declaration for Green 4Th Street in the Towerside Innovation District a Portion of Which is Within the Park Currently

Referred to as Towerside Park

Whereas The Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board (MPRB) was established in 1883 by an act of the State Legislature Whereas MPRB is authorized to contract with public and private entities in the performance of its duties Whereas The Towerside Innovation District a Minnesota nonprofit corporation is a collaboration of public and private partners including MPRB working to transform an overlooked asset-rich district at the heart of the Twin Cities into an equitable and restorative demonstration of 21st Century urban redevelopment Whereas The Maintenance District is a duly organized Minnesota nonprofit corporation whose members consist of all the parties that control parcels of real property located within the Innovation District and that adjoin the public right of way of 4th Street Southeast between 25th Avenue Southeast and Malcolm Avenue Southeast in the City of Minneapolis Minnesota also known as Green 4th Whereas MPRB owns a park along Green 4th in the Towerside Innovation District referred to as Towerside Park Whereas The City has recently reconstructed Green 4th Street to City-standard design and the Maintenance District and the Green 4th Owners desire to create above-standard enhancements to transform Green 4th Street into a so-called ldquogreen streetrdquo with vegetated facilities to manage stormwater runoff and to create an innovative livable community Whereas The Maintenance District and the Green 4th Owners desire to enter into one or more agreements to establish maintenance standards allocation of responsibly authority over initial installation an ldquoOperatorrdquo to perform certain maintenance activities a voluntary assessment process to reimburse the Operator and the creation of a maintenance reserve fund Whereas MPRB has been asked to be part of the agreement but is not required as a public entity to pay into the maintenance reserve fund and Whereas This resolution is supported by the MPRB 2007-2020 Comprehensive Plan which envisions ldquoDynamic parks that shape city character and meet diverse community needsrdquo

Packet Pg 221

RESOLVED That the Board of Commissioners approves the Operations and Maintenance Declaration for Green 4th Street in the Towerside Innovation District a portion of which is within the park currently referred to as Towerside Park and RESOLVED That the President of the Board and Secretary to the Board are authorized to take all necessary administrative actions to implement this resolution

Packet Pg 222

TO Planning Committee FROM Michael Schroeder DATE August 19 2020 SUBJECT Resolution Approving Operations and Maintenance Declaration for Green 4Th Street in

the Towerside Innovation District a Portion of Which is Within the Park Currently Referred to as Towerside Park

BACKGROUND This resolution considers approving an Operations and Maintenance Declaration for Green 4th Street in the Towerside Innovation District This agreement represents a next step in the ongoing role of the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board (MPRB) in the Towerside Innovation District planning effort building off of the Memorandum of Understanding with the Prospect North Partnership for Participation in the Planning of the Prospect North Innovation District in 2016 the East of the River Park Master Plan adoption in 2017 and subsequent new park acquisition in the Towerside Innovation District in 2019 The public realm in the Towerside Innovation District is being maintained through partners of a Maintenance District of which MPRB has been asked to be a member as a district landowner along Green 4th Street About the Operations and Maintenance Declaration The declaration establishes that the Maintenance District will assume responsibility for the public realm outside of the normal seasonal maintenance functions performed by MPRB including mowing plowing and managing the urban tree canopy MPRB will operate the sidewalk and park with standard MPRB procedures MPRB has not been asked to contribute financially toward the Maintenance District but has been invited to be part of the Operations and Maintenance Declaration as a landowner adjacent to the Green 4th Street right of way This Declaration has been reviewed and approved by MPRB legal counsel This agreement has been reviewed by legal counsel as to form and legality FUNDINGCOST SUMMARY The Operations and Maintenance Declaration carries no financial commitment on the part of the MPRB RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Operations and Maintenance Declaration for Green 4th Street

Packet Pg 223

This action is supported by the following vision and goal statements in the MPRB 2007-2020 Comprehensive Plan Vision Theme 3 Dynamic parks that shape city character and meet diverse community

needs Goal Parks shape and evolving city Goal Park facility renewal and development respects history and focuses on

sustainability accessibility flexibility and beauty ATTACHMENTS

bull Attachment A - Operation and Maintenance Declaration for Green 4th Street in Towerside Innovation District (DOCX)

Packet Pg 224

Operations and Maintenance Declaration

Green 4th Street (East)

This Operations and Maintenance Declaration ndash Green 4th Street (East) (this ldquoDeclarationrdquo) is

made as of July ____ 2020 by TOWERSIDE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT a Minnesota nonprofit

corporation (the ldquoMaintenance Districtrdquo) and each of the Owners as defined and described herein

RECITALS

A Towerside Innovation District a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (ldquoTowersiderdquo) is a

collaboration of public and private partners working to transform an overlooked asset-rich district at the

heart of the Twin Cities (the ldquoInnovation Districtrdquo) into an equitable and restorative demonstration of 21st

Century urban redevelopment

B The Maintenance District is a duly organized Minnesota nonprofit corporation whose

members consist of all the party or parties their heirs executors or assigns who hold fee simple title to or

who hold a long-term ground lease pursuant to which such ground lessee exercises possessory rights over

(collectively the ldquoGreen 4th Ownersrdquo) any of those certain parcels of real property located within the

Innovation District which adjoin the public right of way of 4th Street Southeast between 25th Avenue

Southeast and Malcolm Avenue Southeast (ldquoGreen 4th Streetrdquo) in the city of Minneapolis (the ldquoCityrdquo)

Minnesota Green 4th Street is generally depicted on the attached Exhibit A-1

C The City has recently reconstructed Green 4th Street with City-standard pavement curb

and gutter sidewalk stormwater facilities and lighting and the Maintenance District and the Green 4th

Owners desire to cause the installation of certain above-standard Enhancements (as defined herein) to

transform Green 4th Street into a so-called ldquogreen streetrdquo with vegetated facilities to manage stormwater

runoff and to create an innovative livable community which aligns with the vision of the broader Towerside

Innovation District

D The Maintenance District and the Green 4th Owners desire to enter into one or more

agreements to establish (i) uniform minimum maintenance standards for each element of the

Enhancements (ii) the allocation of responsibly among the Green 4th Owners for ongoing maintenance for

each element of the Enhancements (iii) the authority of Towerside andor the Maintenance District to cause

the initial installation of the Enhancements (iv) an ldquoOperatorrdquo (as defined below) to perform certain

maintenance activities on behalf of an individual Green 4th Owner andor the Green 4th Owners as a whole

(v) a voluntary assessment process to reimburse the Operator for certain costs associated with the

maintenance repair and replacement of certain Enhancements and (vi) a mechanism for the creation of a

maintenance reserve fund managed by the Operator to ensure that the Enhancements are maintained to the

standards required by this Declaration and as otherwise required by the City

E For purposes of equitably allocating and efficiently administering the costs and

responsibilities for the maintenance of the Enhancements the Maintenance District and the Green 4th

Owners have divided Green 4th Street into two sections which are referred to herein as the ldquoWest Sectionrdquo

and the ldquoEast Sectionrdquo The West Section and the East Section are divided by 29th Avenue South and are

generally depicted on the attached Exhibit A-1

F This Declaration is entered into by those certain Green 4th Owners (herein each an

ldquoOwnerrdquo and collectively the ldquoOwnersrdquo) whose parcels of real property adjoin the East Section of Green

4th Street which are identified as Parcels E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 and E7 on the attached Exhibit A-1 and

legally described on the attached Exhibit A-2 (each a ldquoParcelrdquo and collectively the ldquoParcelsrdquo) and

Packet Pg 225

encumbers such Parcels adjoining the East Section The Green 4th Owners whose parcels of real property

adjoin the West Section are parties to a separate declaration related to the West Section of Green 4th Street

G Each Owner has evidenced its agreement that it and its Parcel shall be bound by this

Declaration by executing such Ownerrsquos respective Consent and Joinder to Declaration each attached hereto

and the terms of which are incorporated into this Declaration (each an ldquoOwner Consentrdquo and collectively

the ldquoOwner Consentsrdquo)

NOW THEREFORE in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein

including the foregoing recitals which are incorporated into this Declaration and made a part hereof the

Maintenance District and each Owner by executing its respective Owner Consent hereby declare that the

Parcels are and shall be held transferred sold conveyed and occupied subject to the conditions covenants

restrictions and easements hereinafter set forth

DECLARATION

1 Definitions For purposes of this Declaration the following definitions apply

(a) ldquoApproving Ownersrdquo means a majority of the Contributing Owners

(b) ldquoConstant Dollarsrdquo shall mean the value of the US dollar to which such phrase

refers as adjusted from time to time An adjustment shall occur on January 1 2030 and thereafter at 10-

year intervals Constant Dollars shall be determined by multiplying the dollar amount to be adjusted by a

fraction the numerator of which is the Current Index Number and the denominator of which is the Base

Index Number The ldquoBase Index Numberrdquo shall be the Index for January 2020 the ldquoCurrent Index

Numberrdquo shall be the Index for April of the adjustment year the ldquoIndexrdquo shall be the Consumer Price Index

for All Urban Consumers published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of

Labor for US City Average All Items (1982-84=100) or any successor index thereto as hereinafter

provided If publication of the Index is discontinued or if the basis of calculating the Index is materially

changed then the Owners shall substitute for the Index comparable statistics as computed by an agency of

the United States Government or if none by a substantial and responsible periodical or publication of

recognized authority most closely approximating the result which would have been achieved by the Index

(c) ldquoContributing Ownersrdquo means all the Owners except the Owners of the Public

Benefit Parcels

(d) ldquoEnhancementsrdquo means the following above-standard improvements elements

and features which are constructed installed placed or otherwise located on that portion of Green 4th

Street adjoining the Parcels by Towerside the Maintenance District an Owner the City or any of their

respective designees to enhance Green 4th Street and create the innovative sustainable green street and

livable community envisioned by Towerside and the Owners as reflected by this Declaration including

without limitation

(i) Stormwater management Enhancements consisting of green street

planters and related curb cuts grates catch basins grading recontouring excavation and

backfill permeable precast pavers with turf grass seed plugs

(ii) Placemaking Enhancements consisting of interpretive and wayfinding

signage custom fabricated benches tables stages and stairs electrical outlets and

decorative lighting custom fabricated swing landform berms boulevard pavement

(excluding standard City sidewalks which will be maintained by the City andor the

Packet Pg 226

adjoining Owner pursuant to applicable City ordinances and regulations) bike racks trash

cans and moveable tables and chairs

(iii) Landscaping planting and vegetation Enhancements consisting of

planting and structural soils hardwood mulch and rock mulch steel edging two-inch

caliber (or greater) BampB trees of various species perennial plants and grasses of various

species

The Enhancements for each Parcel are identified and specified on the Enhancements Schedule and

Maintenance Standards attached as Exhibit B and are shown on the construction drawings for the

Enhancements copies of which have been delivered to each of the initial Owners and are on file with the

Maintenance District

(e) ldquoGovernmental Requirementsrdquo means all federal state county City or other

municipal laws rules ordinances regulations directives orders andor requirements now in force or which

may hereafter be in force with respect to the Parcels

(f) ldquoMaintained Enhancementsrdquo means with respect to each Ownerrsquos respective

Parcel those certain Enhancements located in the portion of Green 4th Street adjoining such Ownerrsquos

respective Parcel andor the Enhancements such Owner is otherwise responsible to maintain pursuant to

Section 4 and the Enhancements Schedule and Maintenance Standards

(g) ldquoEnhancements Schedule and Maintenance Standardsrdquo means Exhibit B to this

Agreement which (i) describes the various Enhancements (ii) identifies which Enhancements are located

on each Parcel (iii) identifies whether each Enhancement is an Maintained Enhancement by one or more

Owners under Section 3 or an Operator-maintained Enhancement subject to the Shared Maintenance

provisions under Sections 4 through 6 and (iv) specific maintenance standards for each type of

Enhancement

(h) ldquoOperatorrdquo means the person entity or other organization delegated by the

Approving Owners to perform the Shared Maintenance but shall not include the owner of Public Benefit

Parcel E1 The Maintenance District will be the initial Operator until removed by an affirmative vote of

the Approving Owners in accordance with Section 7

(i) ldquoOwnerrsquos Sharerdquo is a percentage determined by dividing the lineal front footage

adjoining Green 4th Street of the Parcel owned by such Owner by the total lineal front footage adjoining

the East Section of Green 4th Street of all the Parcels in each case excluding the Public Benefit Parcels

The current Ownerrsquos Share for each Contributing Owner as of the date of this Declaration is identified on

Exhibit C In the event any Parcel is further subdivided at the request of the applicable Contributing

Owner Operator shall re-calculate the Ownerrsquos Share for each such Owner and Parcel in accordance with

the method set forth in this section

(j) ldquoPublic Benefit Parcelsrdquo means both ldquoParcel E1rdquo and ldquoParcel E2rdquo as identified on

the attached Exhibit A-1 and Exhibit A-2

2 Initial Construction of the Enhancements

(a) Permitting Each Owner grants Towerside and the Maintenance District the right

to apply for negotiate and obtain from the City on behalf of each Owner and Towerside such licenses

permits and consents as may be required in order for Towerside to cause the initial construction

installation and placement of the Enhancements This right does not provide for Towerside or the

Packet Pg 227

Maintenance District to encumber any Ownerrsquos property without that Ownerrsquos consent Each Owner will

reasonably cooperate with and assist Towerside and the Maintenance District in its efforts to obtain such

licenses permits and consents including without limitation promptly executing any necessary

applications and making reasonable efforts to meet with and appear before City officials and governing

bodies in furtherance of the same

(b) Design Prior to installation and construction of the initial Enhancement

Towerside shall have the right to remove alter substitute or replace any of the Enhancements in its sole

discretion without the approval or consent of any of the Owners provided that such change to the

Enhancements does not cause an increase in the applicable Budget (defined below)

3 Maintenance of Enhancements

(a) Maintenance Standards All Enhancements shall be maintained in good order

condition and repair and in accordance with maintenance guidelines provided by the designer

manufacturer andor supplier of each individual Enhancement and components thereof in accordance with

all Governmental Requirements and commensurate with other first class civic spaces and green streets of

comparable size and scale in the Minneapolis-St Paul metropolitan area (the ldquoStandardrdquo) The specific

maintenance requirements for the Enhancements are as set forth in the Enhancements Schedule and

Maintenance Standards attached as Exhibit B

(b) Owner Maintenance Obligations Except as provided in Section 4 each

Contributing Owner shall maintain repair and replace at its sole cost and expense its respective

Maintained Enhancements as allocated to such Contributing Owner and as identified by Parcel on Exhibit

B in accordance with the applicable maintenance standards set forth on Exhibit B and otherwise in

accordance with the terms of this Declaration and applicable Governmental Requirements As Shared

Maintenance (defined below) Operator shall maintain repair and replace as part of the Shared Costs

(defined below) all Enhancements located on the portion of Green 4th Street adjoining the Public Benefit

Parcels in accordance with the applicable maintenance standards set forth on Exhibit B and otherwise in

accordance with the terms of this Declaration and applicable Governmental Requirements

(c) General Parcel Maintenance Covenants Each Owner covenants and agrees to

construct operate maintain and keep those portions of its respective Parcel without buildings or other

vertical improvements (eg those areas improved with sidewalks landscaped areas parking areas etc

located outside of Green 4th Street) (ldquoNon-Building Areasrdquo) in a condition and state of repair that meets or

exceeds the Standard in compliance with all Governmental Requirements and otherwise in compliance

with the provisions of this Agreement All Non-Building Area improvements shall be repaired or replaced

with materials at least equal to the quality of the materials being repaired or replaced Such operation

maintenance and repair obligation shall include but not be limited to the following

(i) Drive and Parking Areas Maintaining all paved surfaces and curbs in a

smooth and evenly covered condition including without limitation replacement of base

skin patch resurfacing and resealing

(ii) Debris Refuse and Snow Periodically removing papers debris filth

refuse ice and snow (when and to the extent required by City code and ordinances)

including vacuuming and broom-sweeping to the extent necessary to keep the Non-

Building Areas in a condition that meets the Standard

(iii) Lighting Maintaining cleaning and replacing lighting facilities including

light standards wires conduits lamps ballasts and lenses time clocks and circuit breakers

Packet Pg 228

(iv) Landscaping Maintaining and replacing all landscape plantings trees and

shrubs in an attractive and thriving condition trimmed and weed-free maintaining and

replacing landscape planters providing water for landscape irrigation through a properly

maintained system including performing any seasonal (start up andor winterization)

maintenance thereto and any modifications to such system to satisfy governmental water

allocation or emergency requirements

(v) Maintaining cleaning and replacing sidewalks including those adjacent

and contiguous to buildings in accordance with the Standard including keeping all

sidewalks clean swept at appropriate intervals and shall be cleared of ice or snow (when

and to the extent required by City code and ordinances)

4 Shared Maintenance Operator shall perform the following maintenance activities related

to Green 4th Street and the Enhancements (the ldquoShared Maintenancerdquo) on behalf of the Owners subject to

reimbursement by the Contributing Owners in accordance with Section 6 Shared Maintenance shall be

performed in compliance with all applicable Governmental Requirements and otherwise consistent with the

Standard the other provisions of this Agreement and the applicable Budget provided however in no event

shall Operator be obligated to perform any Shared Maintenance for which adequate funds have not been

provided by the Contributing Owners

(a) Debris and Refuse Seasonal pressure washing and intensive cleanup which may

include removal of papers debris and refuse including broom-sweeping of paved areas gum removal

graffiti removal as necessary

(b) Fixtures Equipment and Signage Maintaining cleaning and replacing any

appropriate bike racks trashrecycling bins benches tables chairs and any non-City wayfinding and other

signage

(c) Public Benefit Parcels Maintaining and replacing all Enhancements located on the

portion of Green 4th Street adjoining the Public Benefit Parcels

The Owners of the Public Benefit Parcels shall not be responsible for the maintenance of any

Enhancements all such maintenance to be the responsibility of Operator hereunder

5 License for Construction and Maintenance Each Owner hereby grants and conveys to

Operator its employees agents contractors and other designees a non-exclusive right and license to enter

upon such limited portions of each Ownerrsquos respective Parcel as shall from time to time be reasonably

necessary for the construction reconstruction installation repairs to replacements of and maintenance of

any Enhancements all as shall be reasonably necessary for Operator to perform its obligations pursuant to

Sections 2 and 4 above Operator shall endeavor to provide at least 48 hoursrsquo prior notice to the Owner of

any Parcel on which Operator intends to enter for purposes of exercising this license

6 Assessment and Reimbursement for Shared Costs

(a) Subject to the terms of this Section 6 each Owner shall pay to Operator the

Ownerrsquos Share of all costs and expenses incurred in connection with the Shared Maintenance and other

shared costs for the promotion advancement and administration of Green 4th Street and the Enhancements

(collectively the ldquoShared Costsrdquo) Shared Costs may include without limitation the following but only to

the extent included or includable in the applicable Budget

Packet Pg 229

(i) All costs and expenses paid by Operator for performing the Shared

Maintenance including any maintenance and service contracts

(ii) Overhead administrative costs and management fees of Operator for the

performance of its obligations hereunder

(iii) The cost of supplying all utilities to the Enhancements

(iv) The cost of licenses certificates permits and inspections and the cost of

contesting the validity or applicability of any governmental enactments which affect the

Enhancements andor Green 4th Street

(v) The cost of insurance carried by Operator hereunder

(vi) Contributions to reserves for replacements capital improvements etc of

the Enhancements

(vii) Funds allocated for public art public events and community engagement

(b) Operator shall endeavor to obtain at least three bids for all aspects of the Shared

Maintenance and Operator shall select the lowest qualified bidder

(c) By no later than October 1 of each calendar year the Operator shall deliver to the

Owners a budget of the Shared Costs for the next calendar year (the ldquoBudgetrdquo) The initial Budget is

attached hereto as Exhibit D (the ldquoFirst Budgetrdquo) which is hereby approved by the Owners

(d) Commencing on the effective date of this Declaration (prorated for the initial

partial calendar quarter of the term of this Declaration) and no later than January 1 April 1 July 1 and

October 1 of each calendar year each Owner shall pay one-quarter of such Ownerrsquos Share of the annual

estimated maintenance cost Budget for such calendar year

(e) By March 31 of each calendar year Operator will reconcile the actual Shared Costs

incurred with respect to the applicable Budget and Operator shall pay each Owner any overpayment or

each Owner shall pay to Operator any underpayment as applicable of the difference between the quarterly

payments made by the Owners for the applicable Budget and the actual Shared Costs due from the Owner

for such calendar year provided that the Owners shall not without the Approving Owners consent be liable

for actual Shared Costs which exceed the applicable Budget in total by more than five percent At Operatorrsquos

election in lieu of refunding an Owner Operator may credit any overpayment against the payment(s) next

coming due for the succeeding year

(f) After the First Budget in the event the total Budget for any year exceeds the total

Budget for the previous year by more than five percent such Budget will only be binding on the Owners if

the Approving Owners consent to the Budget Absent such consent the Budget will be adjusted to equal no

greater than 105 of the previous yearrsquos Budget

(g) If decided by an affirmative vote of the Approving Owners the Budget shall

include payments to fund an emergency reserve account for unanticipated non-budgeted expenses The

payments to be contributed to any such emergency reserve account shall in no event exceed five percent

(5) of the Budget (less the reserve account payments) in any given year Each Contributing Owner shall

pay to Operator such Ownerrsquos Share of the total required reserve amount payments as part of such

Packet Pg 230

Contributing Ownerrsquos quarterly Budget payments described in Section 6(d) Operator shall have the right

to use such funds for emergency purposes when needed

7 Approving Owners Any action that may be taken by the Approving Owners pursuant to

this Declaration (an ldquoApproving Owner Decisionrdquo) may be taken with or without a meeting provided the

requirements of this Section 7 are met

(a) Notice of a required Approving Owner Decision shall be delivered to each

Contributing Owner not later than 10 business days before the day on which the Approving Owner Decision

is to be made The notice shall include the deadline for the Approving Owner Decision and a statement of

the purposes thereof An Owner may waive notice of an Approving Owner Decision A waiver of notice by

an Owner is effective whether given before or after an Approving Owner Decision

(b) If an Owner receives notice in the manner required by this Declaration of a required

Approving Owner Decision and fails to vote by the voting deadline included therein such Owner shall be

deemed to have affirmatively voted in favor of the Approving Owner Decision

(c) An Approving Owner Decision that is adopted by an affirmative vote of the

Approving Owners shall be an act of the Owners

8 Default and Remedies

(a) Default Failure to Pay Amounts Due If an Owner or Operator fails to make any

payment when due as required under this Declaration and such failure continues for a period of 15 days

after written notice by the party entitled to payment hereunder then the party failing to make such payment

shall be in default of this Declaration

(b) Default Failure to Perform Self-Help Remedy If an Owner or Operator fails to

perform or comply with any term condition or obligation of this Declaration (other than payment as

described in Section 8(a) for which only the notice set forth in Section 8(a) shall be required) and such

failure continues for 30 days after receipt of written notice from any other party (or such longer period as

may be reasonable under the circumstances if the failure cannot be cured within 30 days and the party

failing to perform commences to cure within 30 days and diligently and continuously prosecutes such cure

to completion) then the party failing to perform shall be in default of this Declaration Upon such default

Operator (or any Owner if Operator is the defaulting party) may proceed to cure the default by payment or

performance The defaulting party shall immediately reimburse Operator or the curing Owner as the case

may be for all reasonable costs and expenses incurred to cure the default The 30-day notice period shall

not be required in the event of an emergency condition in which event the party curing the default shall

give whatever notice is reasonable under the circumstances Nothing contained in this Section shall create

any obligation on the part of any Owner to exercise the rights granted herein or perform another Ownerrsquos

obligations

(c) Interest Whenever a party shall not have paid any amount payable under this

Declaration to another party within 30 days of the due date the delinquent party shall pay interest on such

amount from the due date until the date such payment is received by the party entitled thereto at a rate

which is the lesser of (i) 12 per annum or (ii) the highest percent rate permitted by law

(d) Costs and Attorneysrsquo Fees In the event Operator or an Owner shall institute any

action or proceeding against another party hereto relating to the provisions of this Declaration or to collect

any amounts owing hereunder or an arbitration proceeding is commenced by agreement of the parties to

any dispute then in such event the prevailing party shall be entitled to reimbursement from the defaulting

Packet Pg 231

party for all third party costs and expenses actually incurred as a result of such proceedings including

reasonable attorneysrsquo fees and costs

(e) Remedies All remedies are cumulative and shall be deemed additional to any and

all other remedies to which Operator or an Owner may be entitled to at law or in equity Operator and each

Owner shall also have the right to restrain by injunction any violation or threatened violation by another of

the terms covenants or conditions of this Declaration or to obtain a decree to compel performance of any

such term covenant or condition it being agreed that the remedy at law for a breach of any such term

covenant or condition (except those if any requiring the payment of a liquidated sum) is not adequate No

default under this Declaration shall (i) entitle any person to cancel rescind or otherwise terminate this

Declaration or the rights created by this Declaration or (ii) defeat or render invalid the lien of any mortgage

made in good faith and for value as to any Parcel Operator and each Owner agrees that there shall be no

individual liability of any partners officers directors shareholders or employees of Operator or an Owner

with respect to any claims under this Declaration and expressly waives any and all rights to proceed against

such parties

(f) Cityrsquos Right to Remove andor Maintain Enhancements Operator and each Owner

acknowledges and agrees that any failure by Operator andor each Owner as applicable to maintain the

Enhancements in accordance with this Declaration could result in the City performing such maintenance

andor removing unmaintained Enhancements with cost and expense of such City action being chargeable

to each benefitted Parcel as a special assessment in accordance with City code and ordinances

9 Insurance and Indemnification

(a) Owner Liability Insurance Each Owner at its own cost and expense shall

maintain or cause to be maintained commercial general liability insurance in the amount of $1000000 in

Constant Dollars combined single limit per occurrence and $2000000 in Constant Dollars in the aggregate

Such limits of liability may be included in an Ownerrsquos blanket policy covering other locations in addition

to the Parcel or Parcels owned by such Owner so long as such Owner also maintains an umbrella policy of

insurance with a per occurrence limit of liability of not less than $500000000 in Constant Dollars The

insurance maintained by each Owner shall be primary and not contributory Each Owner agrees to look first

to the insurance coverage obtained pursuant to this Section 9(a) for claims relating to the Enhancements

covered under the insurance policy thereunder and to exhaust all limits thereof before making any claims

under the insurance carried under Section 9(b) other than to preserve rights if coverage under this Section

is inadequate

(b) Operator Liability Insurance Operator shall at its own cost and expense maintain

or cause to be maintained commercial general liability insurance covering the Enhancements in the amount

of $2000000 in Constant Dollars combined single limit per occurrence and $2000000 in Constant Dollars

in the aggregate The insurance policy required hereunder shall

(i) name the other Owners as additional insureds

(ii) provide that the policy may not be canceled or materially reduced in

amount or coverage without at least 20 days prior written notice by the insurer to each

insured and any additional insured

(iii) provide that an act or omission of one of the insureds or additional insureds

which would void or otherwise reduce coverage shall not reduce or void the coverage as

to any other insureds or additional insureds respectively

Packet Pg 232

(iv) be an ldquooccurrencerdquo based policy and not a ldquoclaims maderdquo based policy

The premiums for said policy and any deductibles payable shall be included as part of Shared Costs

(c) Property Insurance Each Owner at its own cost and expense shall maintain or

cause to be maintained special form insurance against direct cause of physical loss including the cost of

debris removal in the amount of not less than the full insurable replacement cost of the structure and its

improvements including each Ownerrsquos respective Maintained Enhancements (excluding the cost of

excavations foundations and footings) together with an agreed-amount endorsement a replacement cost

endorsement and a waiver of subrogation endorsement Such insurance shall be effective upon the

commencement of construction of any improvements upon an Ownerrsquos Parcel

(d) Waiver of Subrogation Each Owner and Operator hereby mutually release each

other from liability and waive all right of recovery against each other for any loss or damage to the Parcels

any improvements located thereon the contents contained therein or any Enhancements to the extent such

loss or damage is covered by insurance required to be maintained by each respective party under this

Declaration whether or not such required insurance is actually maintained Such waiver shall also apply to

the extent of any deductible maintained by any such Owner under its insurance policies This waiver of

subrogation applies to any such loss or damage for any cause whatsoever including without limitation the

negligence of the other Owner its occupants or permittees Towerside Innovation District the Maintenance

District or any successor Operator This Section shall be inapplicable if it would have the effect but only

to the extent it would have the effect of invalidating any insurance coverage of an Owner This waiver of

subrogation controls to the extent it is in conflict with the indemnification provision set forth in Section

(e) Indemnification Operator shall indemnify and hold the Owners harmless from and

against all claims lawsuits costs expenses damages or liabilities (including reasonable attorneysrsquo fees and

costs) arising or resulting from any occurrence caused by any action taken by Operator pursuant to this

Declaration or in violation of this Declaration Each Owner shall indemnify and hold any other Owner and

Operator harmless from and against all claims lawsuits costs expenses damages or liabilities (including

reasonable attorneysrsquo fees and costs) arising or resulting from any occurrence within the indemnifying

Ownerrsquos Parcel andor associated with the Enhancements such Owner is required to maintain hereunder to

the extent such occurrence is covered by insurance required to be maintained by the indemnifying Owner

under this Declaration whether or not such required insurance is actually maintained provided however

that each such Owner agrees to first look to the insurance coverage maintained by such Owner and to

exhaust all limits thereof before making any claims under this Section other than to preserve rights The

above obligations of the indemnifying Owner include without limitation any occurrence within such

Ownerrsquos Lot resulting from the negligent acts or omissions of the Owner being indemnified

(f) General Insurance RequirementsCertificates of Insurance All insurance required

hereunder shall be procured from companies qualified to transact business in the state of Minnesota

Deductibles shall be commercially reasonable Each Owner and Operator shall upon the reasonable request

of any other party hereto furnish a certificate of insurance or statement of its or its occupants self-insurance

required under this Section is in full force and effect A blanket all risk insurance policy will satisfy the

requirements of this Section only if it specifically allocates an amount not less than the amount of insurance

required to be carried by this Declaration A blanket commercial general liability policy will satisfy the

requirements of this Section only if it provides the amount of coverage (by umbrella or otherwise) as

specifically required by this Declaration for blanket policies (or if not so specifically required then at least

twice the amount of normal non-blanket coverage required by this Declaration)

Packet Pg 233

10 Real Estate Taxes Each Owner shall pay all real estate taxes and assessments levied upon

its Parcel before delinquency provided that each Owner shall have the right to withhold such payment so

long as it contests in good faith with diligence through appropriate proceedings any such real estate taxes

and assessments

11 Runs with the Land Recording This Declaration is binding upon and inures to the benefit

of the parties hereto and their respective legal heirs successors and assigns This Declaration constitute

covenants to run with each Parcel Operator shall record this Declaration against the Parcels with the

appropriate county offices

12 Amendments This Declaration may only be amended or modified in writing and executed

by (a) the Approving Owners and (b) Operator provided however no such amendment or modification

may adversely affect any Ownerrsquos rights hereunder or increase any Ownerrsquos obligations hereunder beyond

a de miniumus extent without such Ownerrsquos consent and joinder to such amendment or modification

Notwithstanding the foregoing the Maintenance District shall have the right without the consent of the

Owners to amend this Declaration to add additional Owners to this Declaration to increase or add Parcels

of real property to adjust Ownerrsquos Shares in accordance with Section 1(d) above to account for any

additional Owners or increased or additional Parcels

13 Dispute Resolution Operator and each Owner agree that if a dispute of any nature arises

out of this Declaration which has not been resolved after good faith in-person negotiation between

representatives of Operator and the applicable Owner(s) the parties will then try to settle the dispute by

mediation administered by the American Arbitration Association under its Commercial Mediation Rules

If the dispute is not resolved by mediation Operator shall have the discretion to determine whether the

dispute shall be litigated in the Minnesota State Courts in Hennepin County Minnesota to which Owner

hereby submits to jurisdiction and venue or arbitrated pursuant to the Commercial Rules of the American

Arbitration Association in effect as of the effective date of this Declaration To the extent a dispute involves

common questions of fact or law that involve third parties whose presence is necessary for complete relief

Owner consents to the joinder in arbitration of such third parties by Operator andor the consolidation of

one or more arbitration actions with such third parties as may be deemed necessary in Operatorrsquos sole

discretion

14 Notices All notices and other communications hereunder shall be in writing and deemed

to have been duly given if sent by email delivered personally sent by reputable overnight courier or sent

by registered or certified mail postage prepaid an in each case addressed as set forth below

If to the

Maintenance

District

Towerside Maintenance District

2828 University Avenue Southeast 200

Minneapolis Minnesota 55414

Attn Stephen Klimek

Email sklimektowersidemsporg

If to an Owner To an email address provided to the Operator if any

or to the address of record (for where Hennepin

County real property tax notices are to be sent) with

respect to each Parcel as applicable or such other

address as the recipient may designate from time to

time by not less than 10 daysrsquo prior written notice

Each such notice or communication shall be deemed to have been given on the date served sent by email

sent by overnight courier or deposited in the US certified mail as applicable Any Owner that provides

Packet Pg 234

notice or any other communication to another Owner pursuant to this Declaration shall in order for such

notice or communication to be deemed effective shall also deliver a copy of such notice or communication

to Operator

15 Delegation Operator may in its reasonable discretion delegate its maintenance and

administrative obligations hereunder to one or more designated Owners contractors subcontractors agents

andor management companies

16 Miscellaneous The captions appearing in this Declaration are inserted only as a matter of

convenience and in no way define limit construe or describe the scope or intent of such sections of this

Declaration nor in any way affect this Declaration The failure of either party to exercise any of its rights is

not a waiver of those rights A party waives only those rights specified in a written document signed by the

party waiving its rights If any provision of this Declaration is held by the final judgment of any court of

competent jurisdiction to be illegal invalid or unenforceable the validity of the remaining portions or

provisions must not be impaired or affected and the rights and obligations of the parties must be construed

and enforced as if this Declaration did not contain that certain part term or provision held to be illegal

invalid or unenforceable Any rule of construction to the effect that any ambiguities are to be resolved

against the drafting party does not apply to the interpretation of this Declaration or any amendments or

exhibits hereto Operator and each Owner shall from time to time execute acknowledge and deliver for

no further consideration all documents and instruments as Operator or any Owner may reasonably request

to further evidence or effectuate the purposes of this Declaration

[Remainder of this page intentionally left blank]

Packet Pg 235

IN WITNESS WHEREOF Towerside Maintenance District has executed this Operations and

Maintenance Declaration ndash Green 4th Street (East) on the date first hereinabove written

TOWERSIDE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT

a Minnesota nonprofit corporation

STATE OF MINNESOTA )

COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )

The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _____________ 2020

by ______________ the _______________ of TOWERSIDE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT a nonprofit

corporation on behalf of the corporation

____________________________________________

Notary Public

THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY

DORSEY amp WHITNEY LLP

50 South Sixth Street

Suite 1500

Minneapolis Minnesota 55402-1498

(612) 340-2600

Packet Pg 236

[Exhibit A-1 to Operation and Maintenance Declaration for Green 4th Street (East)]

Exhibit A-1

Depiction of the Parcels Green 4th Street (West Section and East Section)

Packet Pg 237

[Exhibit A-2 to Operation and Maintenance Declaration for Green 4th Street (East) ndash Towerside Innovation District]

Exhibit A-2

Legal Description of the Parcels

Parcel E1

Lot 1 Block 1 Barnhart Fontana Addition

Parcel E2

Parcel E3

Parcel E4

Par 1 Lots 4 5 and 6 Block 1 All that part of vacated Eustis Street as dedicated in Eustis Park lying

between the extension of the Southeasterly line of Lot 4 Block 1 Eustis Park extended Northerly and the

Northwesterly line of Lot 2 Block 1 Rearrangement of Lot Twenty five (25) Auditors Subdivision Number

Twenty One (21) Minneapolis Minnesota extended Northerly all in Eustis Park

Par 2 Lots 1 and 2 Block 1 Rearrangement Of Lot Twenty Five (25) Auditors Subdivision Number

Twenty One (21) Minneapolis Minnesota

Parcel E5

Lots 1 2 and 3 Block 1 Eustis Park

Parcel E6

Lot 1 Block 1 Prospect Park Senior Housing Hennepin County Minnesota

Parcel E7

Beginning at a point of intersection of the Easterly line of Mary Street with the Northerly line of University

Avenue SE which point is marked by a judicial monument thence Southeasterly along the Northerly line

of University Avenue SE 36475 feet more or less to the point of intersection of the Northerly line of

University Avenue SE with the Westerly line of Thirtieth Avenue SE which point is marked by a judicial

monument thence Northeasterly along the Westerly line of Thirtieth Avenue SE 3115 feet more or less

to the point of intersection of the Westerly line of Thirtieth Avenue SE with the Southerly line of Fourth

Street SE which point is marked by a judicial monument thence Northwesterly along the Southerly line

of Fourth Street SE 54109 feet more or less to the point of intersection of the Southerly line of Fourth

Street SE with the Easterly line of Mary Street which point is marked by a judicial monument thence

Southerly along the Easterly line of Mary Street 35830 feet more or less to the point of beginning also

known and described as Lots 1 2 3 and 4 Geo H Watsons Addition Minneapolis Minn

The boundaries of the above tract of land have been determined and Judicial Landmarks have been set at

the northeasterly southeasterly corners of Lot 1 and the southwesterly and the northwesterly corners of

Lot 4 all pursuant to Torrens Case No 2633

Packet Pg 238

[Exhibit B to Operation and Maintenance Declaration for Green 4th Street (East) ndash Towerside Innovation District]

Exhibit B

Enhancements Schedule and Maintenance Standards

[See attached]

Packet Pg 239

Category Landscape Item Tree Product Info Type Quaking Aspen Groves (Populus tremuloides)

Location(s)

Maintenance Spring ndash inspect plantings and identify specific maintenance needs for the year clean rip-rap and curb cut

inlet clear tree collar and replenish 2rdquo organic mulch remove dead growth replace irrigation bags as needed monthly watering hand weeding amp trash removal

Summer ndash monthly watering hand weeding trash removal amp clearing tree root collar of mulch and soil additional watering during periods of insufficient rainfall Autumn ndash remove fallen leaves and dead growth inspect for distress minor pruningtrimming remove

irrigation bags prior to freezing weather Winter ndash monitor heavy snowfall on branches do not pile snow in tree beds Replacement ndash 35rdquo caliper balled and burlapped root Use planting soil for backfill Establishment Yr 1-3 ndash weekly watering spring-autumn fill soil openings around root ball stake if needed lightly prune critical branches amp leaders Related Items Karl Foerster Feather Reed Grass Gabion Basket Rip-Rap Organic Mulch

Steel Plate Edging Curb Cut amp Grate Electrical Outlets

Responsible Parties Owners ndash Responsible for the Maintained Element abutting their individual parcels E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 Operator ndash Responsible for the Maintained Element abutting the Public Benefit Parcels E2

Parcel E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 Qty Each 0 6 2 4 11 4 21

Packet Pg 240

Category Landscape Item Tree Product Info Type Regal Prince Oak (Quercus robur x bicolor Long)

Location(s)

Maintenance Spring ndash inspect plantings and identify specific maintenance needs for the year clean curb cut inlet clear

tree collar and replenish 2rdquo organic mulch remove dead growth replace irrigation bags as needed monthly watering hand weeding amp trash removal

irrigation bags prior to freezing weather Winter ndash monitor heavy snowfall on branches do not pile snow in tree beds Replacement ndash 35rdquo caliper balled and burlapped root Use planting soil for backfill Establishment Yr 1-3 ndash weekly watering spring-autumn fill soil openings around root ball stake if needed lightly prune critical branches amp leaders Related Items Prairie Dropseed Grass Organic Mulch Planting Soil

Responsible Parties Owners ndash Responsible for the Maintained Element abutting their individual parcels E3 E4 E6 E7 Operator ndash Responsible for the Maintained Element abutting the Public Benefit Parcels E1

Packet Pg 241

Category Landscape Item Tree Product Info Type Autumn Splendor Buckeye (Aesculus Autumn Splendor)

Location(s)

Maintenance Spring ndash inspect plantings and identify specific maintenance needs for the year remove crepe paper

clean curb cut inlet clear tree collar and replenish 2rdquo organic mulch remove dead growth replace irrigation bags as needed monthly watering hand weeding amp trash removal

Summer ndash monthly watering hand weeding trash removal amp clearing tree root collar of mulch and soil additional watering during periods of insufficient rainfall Autumn ndash wrap trunk with crepe paper remove fallen leaves and dead growth inspect for distress minor

pruningtrimming remove irrigation bags prior to freezing weather Winter ndash monitor heavy snowfall on branches do not pile snow in tree beds Replacement ndash 35rdquo caliper balled and burlapped root Use planting soil for backfill Establishment Yr 1-3 ndash weekly watering spring-autumn fill soil openings around root ball stake if needed lightly prune critical branches amp leaders Related Items Lesser Calamint Grass Organic Mulch Planting Soil

Responsible Parties Owners ndash Responsible for the Maintained Element abutting their individual parcels E3 E6 Operator ndash NA Category Landscape Item Grass

Packet Pg 242

Product Info Type Karl Foerster Feather Reed (Calamgrostis x acutiflora)

Location(s)

Maintenance Spring ndash cut back to 6rdquo from ground replenish 2rdquo organic mulch monthly hand weeding amp trash removal Summer ndash monthly hand weeding amp trash removal Autumn ndash remove dead growth inspect for stress Winter ndash NA Replacement ndash 2 container Use planting soil for backfill Establishment Yr 1 ndash extensive watering to establish root system Divide plants every 3 years for best appearance Related Items Quaking Aspen Tree Groves Organic Mulch Planting Soil

Packet Pg 243

Category Landscape Item Grass Product Info Type Prairie Dropseed (Sporobolous heterolepsis)

Location(s)

Maintenance Spring ndash cut back to 3rdquo from ground replenish 2rdquo organic mulch monthly hand weeding amp trash removal Summer ndash monthly hand weeding amp trash removal Autumn ndash remove dead growth inspect for stress Winter ndash NA Replacement ndash 1 container Use planting soil for backfill Establishment Yr 1 ndash extensive watering to establish root system Related Items Regal Prince Oak Tree Organic Mulch Planting Soil

Packet Pg 244

Category Landscape Item Grass Product Info Type Lesser Calamint (Calamintha nepeta Ssp nepeta)

Location(s)

Maintenance Spring ndash cut back to 3rdquo from ground remove dead growth replenish 2rdquo organic mulch monthly hand

weeding amp trash removal Summer ndash monthly hand weeding amp trash removal Autumn ndash remove dead growth inspect for stress Winter ndash NA Replacement ndash 1 container Use planting soil for backfill Establishment Yr 1 ndash extensive watering to establish root system Related Items Autumn Splendor Buckeye Tree Organic Mulch Planting Soil

Responsible Parties Owners ndash Responsible for the Maintained Element abutting their individual parcels E3 E6 E7 Operator ndash NA

Packet Pg 245

Category Landscape Item Ground Covering Product Info Type Gabion Basket and Rip Rap (Dresser Trap Rock 3rdquondash6rdquo Item 818)

Location(s)

Maintenance Spring ndash inspect for damage and replace as needed monthly weeding amp trash removal Summer ndash monthly weeding amp trash removal Autumn ndash monthly weeding amp trash removal Winter ndash NA Replacement ndash use same specification type size and color evenly blend with existing rip rap Related Items Quaking Aspen Tree Groves Karl Foerster Feather Reed Grass Organic Mulch

Parcel E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 Qty sqft 0 50 0 30 120 0 150

Packet Pg 246

Category Landscape Item Ground Cover Product Info Type Concrete

Location(s)

Maintenance Spring ndash seasonal power wash monthly sweeping andor trash removal Summer ndash monthly sweeping andor trash removal Autumn ndash monthly sweeping andor trash removal Winter ndash snow removal as needed and required by City of Minneapolis Replacement ndash per City of Minneapolis requirements Related Items Permeable Paver Unit Structural Paver Spacer

Responsible Parties Owners ndash Responsible for the Maintained Element abutting their individual parcels E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 Operator ndash Responsible for the Maintained Element abutting the Public Benefit Parcels E1 E2 (Except Snow Removal)

Packet Pg 247

Category Landscape Item Ground Cover Product Info Type Cypress Wood Organic Mulch (Natual color Double Shredded Hardwood frac12rdquo ndash frac34rdquo size)

Location(s)

Maintenance Spring ndash replenish 2rdquo organic mulch maintain smooth transition to sidewalk and curbs to reduce tripping

hazard monthly weeding amp trash removal Summer ndash monthly weeding amp trash removal Autumn ndash monthly weeding amp trash removal Winter ndash NA Replacement ndash frac12rdquo ndash frac34rdquo in size free of harmful chemicals diseases weed seed insects and debris Applied in 3rdquo depth Related Items Trees Grasses Steel Plate Edging

Curb Cut amp Grate Electrical Outlets

Responsible Parties Owners ndash Responsible for the Maintained Element abutting their individual parcels E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 Operator ndash Responsible for the Maintained Element abutting the Public Benefit Parcels E1 E2

Packet Pg 248

Category Landscape Item Ground Covering Product Info Type Planting Soil (see specification in replacement)

Location(s)

Maintenance Spring ndash Summer ndash Autumn ndash Winter ndash Replacement ndash ASTM D 5268 planting soil with pH range of 50 to 75 a minimum of 8 percent organic material content free of stones 1 inch or larger in any dimension and other extraneous materials harmful to plant growth Mix ASTM D 5268 planting soil with the following soil amendments in the following quantities to produce planting soil Ratio of Compost to Planting Soil by Volume 15 Related Items Trees Grass Organic Mulch

Packet Pg 249

Category Hardscape Item Permeable Paver - Unit Product Info Type Belgard Aqualine Permeable Paver (Graphite Shot Blast Texture 6rdquo x 12rdquo x 3rdquo)

Location(s)

Maintenance Spring ndash inspect paver units replace cracked or broken pavers and ensure a level surface throughout the

area vacuum pavers to remove debris and ensure effective filtration weekly trash removal Summer ndash weekly trash removal monthly sweeping inspection after major rain events to ensure proper

drainage of the area Autumn ndash weekly trash removal monthly sweeping Winter ndash snow removal with rotary broom or plasticrubber edged shovesplow only minimize use of salt

and sand for de-icing or traction Replacement ndash use same specification type size and color replacing related spacers planting medium and grass seed as needed Related Items Structural Spacer Salt Tolerant Seed Planting Medium

Steel Plate Edging Movable Seating

Responsible Parties Owners ndash Responsible for the Maintained Element abutting their individual parcels E3 E4 E7 Operator ndash Responsible for the Maintained Element abutting the Public Benefit Parcels E2

Packet Pg 250

Category Hardscape Item Permeable Paver - Structural Spacer Product Info Type Enviropave Strips (Size 1 716rdquo Model 4036A)

Location(s)

Maintenance Spring ndash inspect spacers units replace cracked or broken pieces and ensure a level surface throughout

the area Summer ndash NA Autumn ndash NA Winter ndash NA Replacement ndash use same specification type size and color replacing related sand setting bed planting medium and grass seed as needed Related Items Permeable Paver - Unit Salt Tolerant Seed

Packet Pg 251

Category Landscape Item Permeable Paver - Grass Product Info Type Seed Mix (see specification in replacement)

Location(s)

Maintenance Spring ndash fill missing soil in joints and reseed bare or dead areas weekly watering and trash removal

monthly weeding and mowing Summer ndash weekly watering and trash removal monthly weeding and mowingtrimming over 3rdquo growth Autumn ndash weekly trash removal mow and inspect for pests and pathogens or disease Winter ndash NA Replacement ndash eco-friendly salt tolerant seed mix 40 Combination of Hard Chewings and Sheep Fescue 20 Strong Creeping Red Fescue and 20 Kentucky Bluegrass Related Items Permeable Paver Unit Structural Paver Spacer Planting Soil

Packet Pg 252

Category Landscape Item Landform - Grass Product Info Type Sod (see specification in replacement)

Location(s)

Maintenance Spring ndash roll re-grade and replant bare or eroded areas add soil for uniformly smooth turf and apply

fertilizer and weed killer weekly watering and trash removal monthly weeding and mowing Summer ndash weekly watering trash removal and mowingtrimming over 3rdquo growth monthly weeding Autumn ndash weekly trash removal mow and inspect for pests and pathogens or disease Winter ndash NA Replacement ndash Eco-Friendly Salt Tolerant sod 40 Combination of Hard Chewings and Sheep Fescue 20 Strong Creeping Red Fescue and 20 Kentucky Bluegrass Related Items Chilton Stone Wall Permeable Pavers

Planting Soil amp Mulch

Responsible Parties Owners ndash NA Operator ndash Responsible for the Maintained Element abutting the Public Benefit Parcels E2

Packet Pg 253

Category Landscape Item Landform ndash Retaining Wall Product Info Type Chilton Stone (natural cut)

Location(s)

Maintenance Spring ndash inspect for structural issues and damage clear debris and power wash monitor for and remove

graffiti Summer ndash monitor for and remove graffiti Autumn ndash monitor for and remove graffiti Winter ndash monitor for and remove graffiti Replacement ndash use same specification type size and color dry stack and grout back half evenly blend with existing color and shapes Related Items Landform Karl Foerster Feather Reed Grass

Responsible Parties Owners ndash NA Operator ndash Responsible for the Maintained Element abutting the Public Benefit Parcels E2 and Approving Ownerrsquos individual parcels E3

Packet Pg 254

Category Landscape Item Steel Edging Product Info Type Hip Dip Galvanized Steel Flat Bar (frac14rdquo thick 6rdquo high)

Location(s)

Maintenance Spring ndash inspect for lose broken or damaged pieces repaint repair or replace as needed Summer ndash NA Autumn ndash NA Winter ndash NA Replacement ndash use same specification type size and color Related Items Quaking Aspen Tree Grasses Gabion Basket Rip Rap

Permeable Pavers Planting Soil amp Mulch

Parcel E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 Qty LF 0 55 149 54 148 68 245

Packet Pg 255

Category Landscape Item Curb Cut amp Grate Product Info Type Cast Iron Grates (Neenah R-4999-CX Type P standard amp custom grates)

Location(s)

Maintenance Spring ndash clear seasonal debris and inspect grates for damage monthly trash removal Summer ndash weekly trash removal inspection after major rain events to ensure proper drainage Autumn ndash clear seasonal debris weekly trash removal Winter ndash monthly trash removal Replacement ndash use same specification type size and color Related Items Grasses Trees Gabion Basket Rip Rap

Planting Soil amp Mulch Steel Edging

Packet Pg 256

Category Fixtures Item Street Lighting Product Info Type Bega Luminaire (Type 99072)

Location(s)

Maintenance Year Round ndash Monitor for functionality and graffiti monthly report issues to City Replacement ndash contact City of Minneapolis for all maintenance needs Related Items

Responsible Parties Owners ndash Contact City of Minneapolis Operator ndash Contact City of Minneapolis

Packet Pg 257

Category Fixtures Item Electrical Product Info Type Landscape Lighting (TBC)

Location(s)

Maintenance Spring ndash inspect fixtures and footings check timer and bulbs for functionality monthly replace bulbs as

needed Summer ndash check timer and bulbs for functionality monthly replace bulbs as needed Autumn ndash check timer and bulbs for functionality monthly replace bulbs as needed Winter ndash check timer and bulbs for functionality monthly replace bulbs as needed Replacement ndash contract electrical contractor to address all issues with fixture(s) conduit and power source Related Items Grasses Stone Wall Electrical Outlet

Landform Swing

Responsible Parties Owners ndash NA Operator ndash Responsible for the Maintained Element abutting the Public Benefit Parcels E2 and Approving Ownerrsquos individual parcels E3 E4 E5 E6 E7

Packet Pg 258

Category Fixtures Item Electrical Product Info Type 20 Amp 120V Receptacles amp 50 Amp 240V Receptacles (ColorFinish TBC)

Location(s)

Maintenance Spring ndash inspect fixtures and footings check outlets for functionality monthly make 240V available on

request Summer ndash check outlets for functionality monthly monitor for and remove graffiti make 240V available on

request Autumn ndash check outlets for functionality monthly monitor for and remove graffiti make 240V available on

request Winter ndash make 240V available on request Replacement ndash contract electrical contractor andor Xcel Energy to address all issues with fixture(s) conduit and power source Related Items Grasses Trees

Landscape Lighting

Responsible Parties Owners ndash NA Operator ndash Responsible for the Maintained Element abutting the Public Benefit Parcels E1 and E2 and Approving Ownerrsquos individual parcels E3 E4 E5 E6 E7

Packet Pg 259

Category Fixtures Item Bike Racks Product Info Type Dero Hoop Rack (In-ground mount standard gauge ndash ColorFinish TBC)

Location(s)

Maintenance Spring ndash inspect fixtures and footings treatpaint surface damage or replace as needed monitor for and

remove graffiti Summer ndash monitor for and remove graffiti Autumn ndash treatpaint surface damage or replace as needed monitor for and remove graffiti Winter ndash monitor for and remove graffiti Replacement ndash order via Dero with the same specification type size and color Related Items Concrete Responsible Parties Owners ndash NA Operator ndash Responsible for the Maintained Element abutting the Approving Ownerrsquos individual parcels E3 E4 E6 E7

Packet Pg 260

Category Fixtures Item Trash Receptacles Product Info Type Landscape Forms Lakeside (Grass side open 30 gal ndash Color TBC)

Location(s) (TBC)

Maintenance Spring ndash inspect fixtures and footings treatpaint surface damage or replace as needed empty twice

weekly or as needed monitor for and remove graffiti Summer ndash empty twice weekly or as needed monitor for and remove graffiti Autumn ndash treatpaint surface damage or replace as needed empty twice weekly or as needed monitor for

and remove graffiti Winter ndash empty twice weekly or as needed monitor for and remove graffiti Replacement ndash order via Landscape Forms with the same specification type size and color Related Items Recycling Receptacles Concrete

Packet Pg 261

Category Fixtures Item Recycling Receptacles Product Info Type Landscape Forms Lakeside (Grass top open 35 gal - Color TBC)

Location(s) (TBC)

and remove graffiti Winter ndash empty twice weekly or as needed monitor for and remove graffiti Replacement ndash order via Landscape Forms with the same specification type size and color Related Items Trash Receptacles Concrete

Packet Pg 262

Category Fixtures Item Swing Product Info Type (TBC)

Location(s)

Maintenance Spring ndash inspect material surfaces connections and footings clean weekly and monitor for and remove

graffiti gum Summer ndash clean weekly monitor for and remove graffiti gum and other potential damage Autumn ndash clean weekly monitor for and remove graffiti gum and other potential damage Winter ndash clean weekly monitor for and remove graffiti gum and other potential damage Replacement ndash (TBC) Related Items Karl Foerster Feather Reed Grass Landscape Lighting

Packet Pg 263

Category Fixtures Item Benches amp Tables Product Info Type (TBC)

Location(s)

Maintenance Spring ndash inspect material surfaces connections and footings clean weekly and monitor for graffiti Summer ndash clean weekly monitor for and remove graffiti gum and other potential damage Autumn ndash clean weekly monitor for and remove graffiti gum and other potential damage Winter ndash clean weekly monitor for and remove graffiti gum and other potential damage Replacement ndash (TBC) Related Items Concrete Permeable Pavers

Karl Foerster Feather Reed Grass Lesser Calamint Grass

Responsible Parties

Owners ndash NA Operator ndash Responsible for the Maintained Element abutting the Approving Ownerrsquos individual parcels E7

Parcel E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 Qty Each 0 0 TBD TBD 0 TBD TBD

Packet Pg 264

Category Fixture Item Interpretive Signage Product Info Type (TBC) Location(s)

Maintenance Spring ndash Summer ndash Autumn ndash Winter ndash Replacement ndash (TBC) Related Items Responsible Parties Owners ndash NA Operator ndash Responsible for the Maintained Element abutting the Public Benefit Parcels E1 E2 and Approving Ownerrsquos individual parcels E3 E4 E5 E6 E7

Packet Pg 265

[Exhibit C to Operation and Maintenance Declaration for Green 4th Street (East) ndash Towerside Innovation District]

Exhibit C

Initial Ownerrsquos Shares

Parcel Initial Owner Lineal Front

Footage

Contributing

Share Share

E1 Minneapolis Park amp Recreation Board - Park 8902 00 000

E2 Timberland Partners - Stormwater System

680 00 000

E3 Timberland Partners - Green on 4th 3804 3804 2523

E4 Aeon - The Louis 1500 1500 995

E5 Oppidan - north site 1500 1500 995

E6 Oppidan - The Pillars 2864 2864 1899

E7 CA Ventures - The Link 5411 5411 3588

Totals 166492 15078 1000

Packet Pg 266

[Exhibit D to Operation and Maintenance Declaration for Green 4th Street (East) ndash Towerside Innovation District]

Exhibit D

First Budget

IncomeLineal Front

FootageShare Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Average

Assessments Monthly totals $5994 $0 $0 $5994 $0 $0 $5994 $0 $0 $5994 $0 $0 $23976 $1898

E1 Minneapolis Park amp Recreation Board 8902 00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

E2 Stormwater System Manager 68 00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

E3 Timberland Partners - Green on 4th 38040 252 $1512 $1512 $1512 $1512 $6049 $1512

E4 Aeon - The Louis 15000 99 $596 $596 $596 $596 $2385 $596

E5 Oppidan - north site 15000 99 $596 $596 $596 $596 $2385 $596

E6 Oppidan - The Pillars 28635 190 $1138 $1138 $1138 $1138 $4553 $1138

E7 CA Ventures - The Link 54108 359 $2151 $2151 $2151 $2151 $8604 $2151

Other Monthly totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

Interest Earned $0 $0

Advertising Income $0 $0

Refunds $0 $0

Other $0 $0

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

Packet Pg 267

ExpensesSites

ScopeJan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Average

Cost of GoodsCost of

ServicesMonthly totals $1923 $373 $373 $4823 $723 $723 $2073 $723 $723 $2323 $373 $373 $15526 $1294

Streetscape Cleaning - Pressure Wash All $400 $400 $800 $400

Streetscape Cleaning - Seasonal Cleanup All $1000 $1000 $1000

Streetscape Cleaning - Trash amp Recycling E1 $208 $208 $208 $208 $208 $208 $208 $208 $208 $208 $208 $208 $2496 $208

Streetscape Cleaning - Grafiti Removal E1-E2 $50 $50 $50 $50 $200 $50

Landscaping - Post-Winter Maintenance E1-E2 $400 $400 $400

Landscaping - Pre-Winter Maintenance E1-E2 $400 $400 $400

Landscaping - Watering Weeding amp Trash E1-E2 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $700 $100

Landscaping - Grass MowTrim E1-E2 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $100 $700 $100

Landscaping - Mulch E1-E2 $350 $350 $350

Fixtures - Bike Racks Trash amp Recycling All $1000 $1000 $2000 $1000

Fixtures - Furniture All $50 $50 $50 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $50 $50 $50 $1500 $125

Fixtures amp Service - Electrical All $115 $115 $115 $115 $115 $115 $115 $115 $115 $115 $115 $115 $1380 $115

Annual Contracting All $1200 $1200 $1200

Contractor Coordination All $300 $900 $900 $300 $2400 $600

OfficeGeneral

AdministrativeMonthly totals $2250 $0 $0 $0 $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $0 $0 $2550 $213

Operator Fee $2000 $2000 $2000

Annual Board Meeting $250 $250 $250

Communications $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $300 $50

Other General amp Admin Expenses $0 $0

Legal Monthly totals $0 $0 $0 $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500 $42

Legal amp Professional Fees $500 $500 $500

Insurance Monthly totals $625 $0 $0 $625 $0 $0 $625 $0 $0 $625 $0 $0 $2500 $208

Insurance $625 $625 $625 $625 $2500 $625

Other Expenses Monthly totals $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $2400 $100

Penalties amp Settlements $0 $0

Bad Debts $0 $0

Interest Expense $0 $0

Contingency $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $2400 $200

Taxes Monthly totals $0 $0 $0 $250 $0 $0 $250 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500 $42

Taxes amp Licenses $250 $250 $500 $250

Packet Pg 268

Consent and Joinder of Lien Holder

Operations and Maintenance Declaration for

Green 4th Street (East) ndash Towerside Innovation District

([Owner])

_____________________________ a _______________ being a lien holder in certain of the real estate

encumbered by this Operations and Maintenance Declaration for Green 4th Street (East) ndash Towerside

Innovation District (the ldquoDeclarationrdquo) to which this Consent is attached by virtue of one or more

Mortgages Deeds of Trust or other documents (the ldquoLien Instrumentsrdquo) hereby consents to the execution

and recording of the Declaration and agrees that the Lien Instruments are subordinate to the Declaration

provided that (a) such consent does not modify or amend the terms and conditions of the Lien Instruments

and related loan documents and (b) such Lien Instruments shall be bound by and subject to the Declaration

as if the Declaration were entered into and recorded prior to the Lien Instruments

STATE OF _____________ )

COUNTY OF ___________ )

The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of ___________ 2020 by

_________________ the ________________ of _____________________ a ____________________

on behalf of the ___________________

Notary Public

Packet Pg 269

TO Planning Committee FROM Michael Schroeder DATE August 19 2020 SUBJECT Discussion of 1720 Marshall Street NE

BACKGROUND Commissioners have requested a review of conditions and possible directions related to MPRB property located at 1720 Marshall Street The 174-acre property lies within the bounds of Above the Falls Regional Park but is not developed for park purposes The building and site were acquired by the MPRB in May 2012 for an amount of $1370000 A grant from the Metropolitan Council in the amount of $608814 was accepted by the MPRB in October 2012 Originally 1720 Marshall Street NE was purchased as a location for an operations center neighborhood opposition forced an abandonment of those plans and an operations center was eventually established on the west bank of the river at 4022-12 Washington Avenue North The property includes a 37780 square foot industrial building with space on two levels Vandalism and deteriorated building environments have resulted in an environment that prevent occupancy of the structure While no specific park development beyond trails is defined for this site the 1720 Marshall Street is important to the continuation of the East Bank Trail along the Mississippi River At a minimum this site should have the capacity to accommodate separated bicycle and pedestrian trails and associated amenities In 2019 the Board of Commissioners authorized exploration of the site as a Somali Museum While that did not occur the adopted Above the Falls Regional Park Master Plan provides for an institutional use at within the regional park boundary The exploration directed by the Board of Commissioners failed to gain traction In early 2020 staff requested letters of interest from entities interested in collaborating with the MPRB to evolve the property Those responses will be a part of the discussion Prepared By Cindy Anderson Executive assistant for Planning Division Strategic Planning Review Cindy Anderson Completed 08102020 1119 AM Adam Arvidson Skipped 08102020 255 PM

Packet Pg 270

Michael Schroeder Completed 08102020 255 PM Jennifer Ringold Completed 08112020 1119 AM Al Bangoura Completed 08112020 1215 PM Planning Committee Pending 08192020 540 PM

Packet Pg 271

Full Agenda


I CALL TO ORDER

1 Roll Call



Minutes of Aug 5 2020 540 PM

Printout Minutes of Aug 5 2020 540 PM


1 5107 630 PM Public Hearing - Approval of Ecological System Plan

Printout 5107 630 PM Public Hearing - Approval of Ecological System Plan

V ACTION ITEMS

1 2020-287 Ecological System Plan Approval

Printout 2020-287 Ecological System Plan Approval

a Attachment A - EcoSysPlan_Comments on Revised Draft_2020-0701

b Attachment B - Ecological System Plan_45day review_ThemeSummary

c Attachment C - Ecological System Plan_45day review_CommentLog

d Attachment D - EcoSysPlan_45DayCommentPeriod_All_200701

2 2020-288 Franklin Avenue Improvements -- Request for Agreement of Temporary Occupancy

Printout 2020-288 Franklin Avenue Improvements -- Request for Agreement of Temporary Occupancy

a Attachment A- Franklin Avenue at Peavey Park Temporary Occupancy Letter

3 2020-289 Towerside Operations and Maintenance Declaration for Green Street 4Th

Printout 2020-289 Towerside Operations and Maintenance Declaration for Green Street 4Th

a Attachment A - Operation and Maintenance Declaration for Green 4th Street in Towerside Innovation District

VI STUDYREPORT ITEM

1 5152 Discussion Item 1720 Marshall Street NE Minneapolis MN

Printout 5152 Discussion Item 1720 Marshall Street NE Minneapolis MN

VII ADJOURNMENT

Appendix


41 middot 5107 630 PM Public Hearing - Approval of Ecological System Plan

51 middot 2020-287 Ecological System Plan Approval

51a middot Attachment A - EcoSysPlan_Comments on Revised Draft_2020-0701

51b middot Attachment B - Ecological System Plan_45day review_ThemeSummary

51c middot Attachment C - Ecological System Plan_45day review_CommentLog

51d middot Attachment D - EcoSysPlan_45DayCommentPeriod_All_200701

52 middot 2020-288 Franklin Avenue Improvements -- Request for Agreement of Temporary Occupancy

52a middot Attachment A- Franklin Avenue at Peavey Park Temporary Occupancy Letter

53 middot 2020-289 Towerside Operations and Maintenance Declaration for Green Street 4Th

53a middot Attachment A - Operation and Maintenance Declaration for Green 4th Street in Towerside Innovation District

61 middot 5152 Discussion Item 1720 Marshall Street NE Minneapolis MN

Committee Meeting P a g e | 2 August 19 2020

Chicago Ave 2021 Highway Safety Improvement Project a Portion of Which is Within Peavey Park

Resolution 2020-289

Resolution Approving Operations and Maintenance Declaration for Green 4Th Street in the Towerside Innovation District a Portion of Which is Within the Park Currently Referred to as Towerside Park

VI STUDYREPORT ITEM

61 Discussion of 1720 Marshall Street NE

VII ADJOURNMENT

I CALL TO ORDER

IV ACTION ITEMS

V STUDYREPORT ITEM

VI ADJOURNMENT

Packet Pg 3

Packet Pg 4

Packet Pg 5

Resolution 2020-287

Packet Pg 6

BACKGROUND

Packet Pg 7

Packet Pg 8

Packet Pg 9

resources

Packet Pg 10

ATTACHMENTS

Packet Pg 11

Sigrid A

11COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 12

Greg Lessard

22COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 13

Packet Pg 14

Packet Pg 15

Thomforde Stephen

33COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 16

Packet Pg 17

Tahera Mamdani

44COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 18

55COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 19

Andrew Willman

66COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 20

77COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 21

Sharon Schmickle

88COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 22

Marian

99COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 23

Packet Pg 24

Karah Olson

Packet Pg 25

Elizabeth

Packet Pg 26

Serena Willey

Packet Pg 27

Rita Doucet

Packet Pg 28

Karen Norberg

Packet Pg 29

Linda Huhn

Packet Pg 30

Cindy Moews

Thank you

Packet Pg 31

Jeannie

Packet Pg 32

Kate Olender

Packet Pg 33

W Lutz

Packet Pg 34

Denise Scharlemann

Packet Pg 35

Robert Cochrane

Packet Pg 36

Claire Price

Best Claire

Packet Pg 37

Christie Nixon

Packet Pg 38

Packet Pg 39

Janice Bisch

Packet Pg 40

Packet Pg 41

Packet Pg 42

Tyler Pederson

Thanks

Packet Pg 43

Tyler Pederson

Thanks

Packet Pg 44

Charlie

Packet Pg 45

Packet Pg 46

Packet Pg 47

Betsy Blume

Packet Pg 48

Mary Canino

Packet Pg 49

Alex Roth

Packet Pg 50

Packet Pg 51

Jessica R

Packet Pg 52

Katie Hill Brandt

Packet Pg 53

Jennifer Smith

Packet Pg 54

Carin Peterson

Packet Pg 55

Packet Pg 56

Ginny Halloran

Packet Pg 57

Packet Pg 58

Lila M Smith

Packet Pg 59

Keith Prussing

Packet Pg 60

Gretchen H

Packet Pg 61

Packet Pg 62

Packet Pg 63

Packet Pg 64

Packet Pg 65

Packet Pg 66

Packet Pg 67

Packet Pg 68

Packet Pg 69

Packet Pg 70

Packet Pg 71

Packet Pg 72

Ryan Atwell

Packet Pg 73

See below

Packet Pg 74

Packet Pg 75

Packet Pg 76

Packet Pg 77

Packet Pg 78

Packet Pg 79

Packet Pg 80

Packet Pg 81

Packet Pg 82

Packet Pg 83

Packet Pg 84

Packet Pg 85

Packet Pg 86

Packet Pg 87

Packet Pg 88

Packet Pg 89

Packet Pg 90

Packet Pg 91

Packet Pg 92

Packet Pg 93

GENERAL

Packet Pg 94

Packet Pg 95

ECONOMY

RESILIENCY

SOCIETY

PUBLIC HEALTH

Packet Pg 96

LONG-TERM THINkING

Packet Pg 97

COMMENTS

Packet Pg 98

COMMENTS

Packet Pg 99

COMMENTS

native species

Packet Pg 100

COMMENTS

Packet Pg 101

COMMENTS

heat island

trees 1

removaltrees 1

programtrees 1

projectstrees 2

Packet Pg 102

COMMENTS

tree mixtrees 1

Packet Pg 103

COMMENTS

wildlife 5

migration seasons

wildlife 4

habitatwildlife 7

wildlife 3

Packet Pg 104

COMMENTS

park planning

engagement 1

engagement 5

engagement 1

chapter

engagement 1

engagement 6

engagement 2

park master plans

engagement 2

engagement 1

document

engagement 1

Packet Pg 105

COMMENTS

engagement 1

engagement 3

engagement 2

engagement 1

communication

engagement 1

planning process

engagement 1

Packet Pg 106

COMMENTS

engagement 1

engagement 6

useconsumption

engagement 1

in the Life chapter

engagement 1

engagement 5

Packet Pg 107

System Plan

support

suggestion

emissions fleet202

Packet Pg 108

System Plan

support

suggestion

emissions fleet202

climate change204

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

recreate

document

centered design303

must be a priority

Packet Pg 109

System Plan

support

suggestion

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

plan307

neighborhood parks

Packet Pg 110

System Plan

support

suggestion

parks312

connectivity313

connectivity 313

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

Packet Pg 111

System Plan

support

suggestion

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

in parks402

managementconcern

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34landscape

managementconcern

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34landscape

managementconcern

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34landscape

reduction

Packet Pg 112

System Plan

support

suggestion

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34landscape

management

degradation

all parks510

parks511

should be banned

homeowners

natural state513

Packet Pg 113

System Plan

support

suggestion

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34landscape

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34landscape

species

landscape

shrubs and forbs

Packet Pg 114

System Plan

support

suggestion

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34landscape

landscape

native vegetation

landscape

plantings

Packet Pg 115

System Plan

support

suggestion

be natives first

plantings

program

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34landscape

activities

amenities

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34landscape

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34landscape

4182019

Community

Environmental

Advisory Commission

(CEAC)

letter nalandscape

landscape

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34landscape

Packet Pg 116

System Plan

support

suggestion

managementsupport

stewardship529

managementsupport

humans

wildlife

landscape

managementsupport

annuals534

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

budget

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

Packet Pg 117

System Plan

support

suggestion

pesticides

use of chemicals

4182019

Community

Environmental

Advisory Commission

(CEAC)

Packet Pg 118

System Plan

support

suggestion

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

to do so

projects801

tree removal803

on trees804

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

climate

reforestation

expansion810

Packet Pg 119

System Plan

support

suggestion

pollinators

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

as habitat

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

as habitat

Packet Pg 120

System Plan

support

suggestion

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

future tree mix816

water quality901

season

and streams

marshes

4182019

Community

Environmental

Advisory Commission

(CEAC)

runoff

Packet Pg 121

System Plan

support

suggestion

from waterbodies906

park projects

projects

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

projects

and habitat

outreach

and habitat

outreach

and habitat

outreach

and habitat

outreach

Packet Pg 122

System Plan

support

suggestion

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

include this note)

protection

sustained

protection

algal blooms

habitat

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

Packet Pg 123

System Plan

support

suggestion

control methods

wildlife1005

Packet Pg 124

System Plan

support

suggestion

wildlife1005

4182019

Community

Environmental

Advisory Commission

(CEAC)

letter na wildlife

introduced species

native plantings

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

restoration

Packet Pg 125

System Plan

support

suggestion

seasons

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

Packet Pg 126

System Plan

support

suggestion

Wirth Park IBA

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

Packet Pg 127

System Plan

support

suggestion

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

activity

Packet Pg 128

System Plan

support

suggestion

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

and biodiversity

for urban wildlife

Packet Pg 129

System Plan

support

suggestion

accomplished

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

than action

yes impossible no

Packet Pg 130

System Plan

support

suggestion

plan1104

Life chapter1105

wildlife

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

wildlife

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

wildlife

Packet Pg 131

System Plan

support

suggestion

wildlife

the plan1107

Packet Pg 132

System Plan

support

suggestion

wildlife a priority

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

implementation

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

Theme 1

Packet Pg 133

System Plan

support

suggestion

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

and engagement

meanshellip

Water and Life1114

plan1115

periodically

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

parks1118

public input1119

life All is related

Packet Pg 134

System Plan

support

suggestion

about the plan

plan1124

human and wildlife

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

recommendation

Packet Pg 135

System Plan

support

suggestion

4182019

Community

Environmental

Advisory Commission

(CEAC)

Packet Pg 136

Lila M Smith

11COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 137

Kathie Noga

22COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 138

33COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 139

44COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 140

Sam Benson

55COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 141

66COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 142

Michelle

77COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 143

Harriet McCleary

88COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 144

Evan Mulholland

99COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 145

Maddie

Packet Pg 146

Rebecca K

Packet Pg 147

Barbara

Packet Pg 148

Margaret Sweeney

Packet Pg 149

Packet Pg 150

Susu Jeffrey

Packet Pg 151

Mary Ludington

Packet Pg 152

Jessica Wardlaw

Packet Pg 153

Barbara Norblom

Packet Pg 154

Julia Rice

Packet Pg 155

Monika

Packet Pg 156

Brian Crotteau

Packet Pg 157

Packet Pg 158

Brian Crotteau

Packet Pg 159

Packet Pg 160

Packet Pg 161

Ginny Halloran

Packet Pg 162

Packet Pg 163

Kathie Noga

Packet Pg 164

Packet Pg 165

john klein

Packet Pg 166

Jeremy Bergerson

Packet Pg 167

Timothyjlamb

Packet Pg 168

Packet Pg 169

Packet Pg 170

Ed McFadden

Packet Pg 171

Dr Mary Harlow

Packet Pg 172

Packet Pg 173

Packet Pg 174

Packet Pg 175

Packet Pg 176

Packet Pg 177

Packet Pg 178

PARK ACCESS

Packet Pg 179

Packet Pg 180

Packet Pg 181

Packet Pg 182

Kay Hansen

Packet Pg 183

Packet Pg 184

Packet Pg 185

Leslie

Packet Pg 186

Packet Pg 187

Sean Connaughty

Packet Pg 188

Packet Pg 189

Francine Marie Tolf

Packet Pg 190

Jaden Hansen

Packet Pg 191

Packet Pg 192

Audrey

Value wildlife

Packet Pg 193

Sigrid

Packet Pg 194

Maggie OConnor

Packet Pg 195

Packet Pg 196

Packet Pg 197

Donna Dralle

Packet Pg 198

Rachel Augusta

Packet Pg 199

Packet Pg 200

Leslie

Packet Pg 201

Packet Pg 202

Constance Pepin

Packet Pg 203

Packet Pg 204

Carmine Profant

Packet Pg 205

Packet Pg 206

Packet Pg 207

Resolution 2020-288

Packet Pg 208

Packet Pg 209

Packet Pg 210

Packet Pg 211

Packet Pg 212

Packet Pg 213

2 of 3

Packet Pg 214

3 of 3

Packet Pg 215

Gina Aulwes

To Gina Aulwes

Hello Gina

Mai Neng

Mai Neng Moua

500 Lafayette Road

St Paul MN 55155-4039

Phone 651-259-5638

mndnrgov

Hi Mai Neng

Packet Pg 216

Thanks

Gina M Aulwes

Bolton amp Menk Inc

Mobile 612-390-1150

Bolton-Menkcom

Packet Pg 217

GVWX33

22nd Street East

21st Street EastCh

19th Street East

Elliot

Peavey Park

erver1

klinFi

oject_

xd | D

ate Sa

LegendI

0 200Feet

Packet Pg 218

amp(94amp(35W

amp(94 )12 )52

21st Street East

18th Street East

19th Street East

10th A

Interstate 35W

22nd Street East

Elliot

Interstate 94

RampCo

s Aven

Peavey Park

erver1

klin11

klin_4

f_6f_I

xd | D

ate Sa

LegendI

Peavey Park0 50Feet

Peavey Park

0 50Feet

Packet Pg 219

TYPICAL SECTIONS

PEAVEY PARK

bmitbl

T47119807

ures119807_ts_02d

6302020

VARVAR

Packet Pg 220

Resolution 2020-289

Packet Pg 221

Packet Pg 222

Packet Pg 223

Packet Pg 224

RECITALS

Innovation District

Packet Pg 225

DECLARATION

Benefit Parcels

without limitation

Packet Pg 226

species

Enhancement

Packet Pg 227

Packet Pg 228

signage

Packet Pg 229

the Enhancements

Packet Pg 230

obligations

Packet Pg 231

such parties

is inadequate

Packet Pg 232

Packet Pg 233

and assessments

discretion

If to the

Maintenance

District

Attn Stephen Klimek

Packet Pg 234

to Operator

Packet Pg 235

____________________________________________

Notary Public

Suite 1500

(612) 340-2600

Packet Pg 236

Exhibit A-1

Packet Pg 237

Exhibit A-2

Parcel E1

Parcel E2

Parcel E3

Parcel E4

Parcel E5

Parcel E6

Parcel E7

Packet Pg 238

Exhibit B

[See attached]

Packet Pg 239

Location(s)

Packet Pg 240

Location(s)

Packet Pg 241

Location(s)

Packet Pg 242

Location(s)

Packet Pg 243

Location(s)

Packet Pg 244

Location(s)

Packet Pg 245

Location(s)

Packet Pg 246

Location(s)

Packet Pg 247

Location(s)

Packet Pg 248

Location(s)

Packet Pg 249

Location(s)

Packet Pg 250

Location(s)

Packet Pg 251

Location(s)

Packet Pg 252

Location(s)

Packet Pg 253

Location(s)

Packet Pg 254

Location(s)

Packet Pg 255

Location(s)

Packet Pg 256

Location(s)

Packet Pg 257

Location(s)

Landform Swing

Packet Pg 258

Location(s)

Landscape Lighting

Packet Pg 259

Location(s)

Packet Pg 260

Location(s) (TBC)

Packet Pg 261

Location(s) (TBC)

Packet Pg 262

Location(s)

Packet Pg 263

Location(s)

Responsible Parties

Packet Pg 264

Packet Pg 265

Exhibit C

Footage

Contributing

Share Share

680 00 000

E4 Aeon - The Louis 1500 1500 995

Totals 166492 15078 1000

Packet Pg 266

Exhibit D

First Budget

IncomeLineal Front

E4 Aeon - The Louis 15000 99 $596 $596 $596 $596 $2385 $596

Refunds $0 $0

Other $0 $0

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

Packet Pg 267

ExpensesSites

OfficeGeneral

Operator Fee $2000 $2000 $2000

Communications $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $300 $50

Insurance $625 $625 $625 $625 $2500 $625

Bad Debts $0 $0

Contingency $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $2400 $200

Packet Pg 268

([Owner])

STATE OF _____________ )

COUNTY OF ___________ )

_________________ the ________________ of _____________________ a ____________________

on behalf of the ___________________

Notary Public

Packet Pg 269

Packet Pg 270

Packet Pg 271

Full Agenda


I CALL TO ORDER

1 Roll Call








V ACTION ITEMS













VI STUDYREPORT ITEM



VII ADJOURNMENT

Appendix













I CALL TO ORDER

IV ACTION ITEMS

V STUDYREPORT ITEM

VI ADJOURNMENT

Packet Pg 3

Packet Pg 4

Packet Pg 5

Resolution 2020-287

Packet Pg 6

BACKGROUND

Packet Pg 7

Packet Pg 8

Packet Pg 9

resources

Packet Pg 10

ATTACHMENTS

Packet Pg 11

Sigrid A

11COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 12

Greg Lessard

22COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 13

Packet Pg 14

Packet Pg 15

Thomforde Stephen

33COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 16

Packet Pg 17

Tahera Mamdani

44COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 18

55COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 19

Andrew Willman

66COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 20

77COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 21

Sharon Schmickle

88COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 22

Marian

99COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 23

Packet Pg 24

Karah Olson

Packet Pg 25

Elizabeth

Packet Pg 26

Serena Willey

Packet Pg 27

Rita Doucet

Packet Pg 28

Karen Norberg

Packet Pg 29

Linda Huhn

Packet Pg 30

Cindy Moews

Thank you

Packet Pg 31

Jeannie

Packet Pg 32

Kate Olender

Packet Pg 33

W Lutz

Packet Pg 34

Denise Scharlemann

Packet Pg 35

Robert Cochrane

Packet Pg 36

Claire Price

Best Claire

Packet Pg 37

Christie Nixon

Packet Pg 38

Packet Pg 39

Janice Bisch

Packet Pg 40

Packet Pg 41

Packet Pg 42

Tyler Pederson

Thanks

Packet Pg 43

Tyler Pederson

Thanks

Packet Pg 44

Charlie

Packet Pg 45

Packet Pg 46

Packet Pg 47

Betsy Blume

Packet Pg 48

Mary Canino

Packet Pg 49

Alex Roth

Packet Pg 50

Packet Pg 51

Jessica R

Packet Pg 52

Katie Hill Brandt

Packet Pg 53

Jennifer Smith

Packet Pg 54

Carin Peterson

Packet Pg 55

Packet Pg 56

Ginny Halloran

Packet Pg 57

Packet Pg 58

Lila M Smith

Packet Pg 59

Keith Prussing

Packet Pg 60

Gretchen H

Packet Pg 61

Packet Pg 62

Packet Pg 63

Packet Pg 64

Packet Pg 65

Packet Pg 66

Packet Pg 67

Packet Pg 68

Packet Pg 69

Packet Pg 70

Packet Pg 71

Packet Pg 72

Ryan Atwell

Packet Pg 73

See below

Packet Pg 74

Packet Pg 75

Packet Pg 76

Packet Pg 77

Packet Pg 78

Packet Pg 79

Packet Pg 80

Packet Pg 81

Packet Pg 82

Packet Pg 83

Packet Pg 84

Packet Pg 85

Packet Pg 86

Packet Pg 87

Packet Pg 88

Packet Pg 89

Packet Pg 90

Packet Pg 91

Packet Pg 92

Packet Pg 93

GENERAL

Packet Pg 94

Packet Pg 95

ECONOMY

RESILIENCY

SOCIETY

PUBLIC HEALTH

Packet Pg 96

LONG-TERM THINkING

Packet Pg 97

COMMENTS

Packet Pg 98

COMMENTS

Packet Pg 99

COMMENTS

native species

Packet Pg 100

COMMENTS

Packet Pg 101

COMMENTS

heat island

trees 1

removaltrees 1

programtrees 1

projectstrees 2

Packet Pg 102

COMMENTS

tree mixtrees 1

Packet Pg 103

COMMENTS

wildlife 5

migration seasons

wildlife 4

habitatwildlife 7

wildlife 3

Packet Pg 104

COMMENTS

park planning

engagement 1

engagement 5

engagement 1

chapter

engagement 1

engagement 6

engagement 2

park master plans

engagement 2

engagement 1

document

engagement 1

Packet Pg 105

COMMENTS

engagement 1

engagement 3

engagement 2

engagement 1

communication

engagement 1

planning process

engagement 1

Packet Pg 106

COMMENTS

engagement 1

engagement 6

useconsumption

engagement 1

in the Life chapter

engagement 1

engagement 5

Packet Pg 107

System Plan

support

suggestion

emissions fleet202

Packet Pg 108

System Plan

support

suggestion

emissions fleet202

climate change204

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

recreate

document

centered design303

must be a priority

Packet Pg 109

System Plan

support

suggestion

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

plan307

neighborhood parks

Packet Pg 110

System Plan

support

suggestion

parks312

connectivity313

connectivity 313

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

Packet Pg 111

System Plan

support

suggestion

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

in parks402

managementconcern

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34landscape

managementconcern

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34landscape

managementconcern

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34landscape

reduction

Packet Pg 112

System Plan

support

suggestion

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34landscape

management

degradation

all parks510

parks511

should be banned

homeowners

natural state513

Packet Pg 113

System Plan

support

suggestion

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34landscape

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34landscape

species

landscape

shrubs and forbs

Packet Pg 114

System Plan

support

suggestion

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34landscape

landscape

native vegetation

landscape

plantings

Packet Pg 115

System Plan

support

suggestion

be natives first

plantings

program

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34landscape

activities

amenities

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34landscape

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34landscape

4182019

Community

Environmental

Advisory Commission

(CEAC)

letter nalandscape

landscape

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

survey 34landscape

Packet Pg 116

System Plan

support

suggestion

managementsupport

stewardship529

managementsupport

humans

wildlife

landscape

managementsupport

annuals534

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

budget

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

Packet Pg 117

System Plan

support

suggestion

pesticides

use of chemicals

4182019

Community

Environmental

Advisory Commission

(CEAC)

Packet Pg 118

System Plan

support

suggestion

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

to do so

projects801

tree removal803

on trees804

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

climate

reforestation

expansion810

Packet Pg 119

System Plan

support

suggestion

pollinators

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

as habitat

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

as habitat

Packet Pg 120

System Plan

support

suggestion

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

future tree mix816

water quality901

season

and streams

marshes

4182019

Community

Environmental

Advisory Commission

(CEAC)

runoff

Packet Pg 121

System Plan

support

suggestion

from waterbodies906

park projects

projects

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

projects

and habitat

outreach

and habitat

outreach

and habitat

outreach

and habitat

outreach

Packet Pg 122

System Plan

support

suggestion

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

include this note)

protection

sustained

protection

algal blooms

habitat

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

Packet Pg 123

System Plan

support

suggestion

control methods

wildlife1005

Packet Pg 124

System Plan

support

suggestion

wildlife1005

4182019

Community

Environmental

Advisory Commission

(CEAC)

letter na wildlife

introduced species

native plantings

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

restoration

Packet Pg 125

System Plan

support

suggestion

seasons

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

Packet Pg 126

System Plan

support

suggestion

Wirth Park IBA

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

Packet Pg 127

System Plan

support

suggestion

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

activity

Packet Pg 128

System Plan

support

suggestion

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

and biodiversity

for urban wildlife

Packet Pg 129

System Plan

support

suggestion

accomplished

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

than action

yes impossible no

Packet Pg 130

System Plan

support

suggestion

plan1104

Life chapter1105

wildlife

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

wildlife

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

wildlife

Packet Pg 131

System Plan

support

suggestion

wildlife

the plan1107

Packet Pg 132

System Plan

support

suggestion

wildlife a priority

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

implementation

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

Theme 1

Packet Pg 133

System Plan

support

suggestion

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

and engagement

meanshellip

Water and Life1114

plan1115

periodically

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

parks1118

public input1119

life All is related

Packet Pg 134

System Plan

support

suggestion

about the plan

plan1124

human and wildlife

4192019

Jerry Bahls Audubon

Chapter of

Minneapolis

recommendation

Packet Pg 135

System Plan

support

suggestion

4182019

Community

Environmental

Advisory Commission

(CEAC)

Packet Pg 136

Lila M Smith

11COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 137

Kathie Noga

22COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 138

33COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 139

44COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 140

Sam Benson

55COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 141

66COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 142

Michelle

77COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 143

Harriet McCleary

88COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 144

Evan Mulholland

99COMPLETECOMPLETE

Packet Pg 145

Maddie

Packet Pg 146

Rebecca K

Packet Pg 147

Barbara

Packet Pg 148

Margaret Sweeney

Packet Pg 149

Packet Pg 150

Susu Jeffrey

Packet Pg 151

Mary Ludington

Packet Pg 152

Jessica Wardlaw

Packet Pg 153

Barbara Norblom

Packet Pg 154

Julia Rice

Packet Pg 155

Monika

Packet Pg 156

Brian Crotteau

Packet Pg 157

Packet Pg 158

Brian Crotteau

Packet Pg 159

Packet Pg 160

Packet Pg 161

Ginny Halloran

Packet Pg 162

Packet Pg 163

Kathie Noga

Packet Pg 164

Packet Pg 165

john klein

Packet Pg 166

Jeremy Bergerson

Packet Pg 167

Timothyjlamb

Packet Pg 168

Packet Pg 169

Packet Pg 170

Ed McFadden

Packet Pg 171

Dr Mary Harlow

Packet Pg 172

Packet Pg 173

Packet Pg 174

Packet Pg 175

Packet Pg 176

Packet Pg 177

Packet Pg 178

PARK ACCESS

Packet Pg 179

Packet Pg 180

Packet Pg 181

Packet Pg 182

Kay Hansen

Packet Pg 183

Packet Pg 184

Packet Pg 185

Leslie

Packet Pg 186

Packet Pg 187

Sean Connaughty

Packet Pg 188

Packet Pg 189

Francine Marie Tolf

Packet Pg 190

Jaden Hansen

Packet Pg 191

Packet Pg 192

Audrey

Value wildlife

Packet Pg 193

Sigrid

Packet Pg 194

Maggie OConnor

Packet Pg 195

Packet Pg 196

Packet Pg 197

Donna Dralle

Packet Pg 198

Rachel Augusta

Packet Pg 199

Packet Pg 200

Leslie

Packet Pg 201

Packet Pg 202

Constance Pepin

Packet Pg 203

Packet Pg 204

Carmine Profant

Packet Pg 205

Packet Pg 206

Packet Pg 207

Resolution 2020-288

Packet Pg 208

Packet Pg 209

Packet Pg 210

Packet Pg 211

Packet Pg 212

Packet Pg 213

2 of 3

Packet Pg 214

3 of 3

Packet Pg 215

Gina Aulwes

To Gina Aulwes

Hello Gina

Mai Neng

Mai Neng Moua

500 Lafayette Road

St Paul MN 55155-4039

Phone 651-259-5638

mndnrgov

Hi Mai Neng

Packet Pg 216

Thanks

Gina M Aulwes

Bolton amp Menk Inc

Mobile 612-390-1150

Bolton-Menkcom

Packet Pg 217

GVWX33

22nd Street East

21st Street EastCh

19th Street East

Elliot

Peavey Park

erver1

klinFi

oject_

xd | D

ate Sa

LegendI

0 200Feet

Packet Pg 218

amp(94amp(35W

amp(94 )12 )52

21st Street East

18th Street East

19th Street East

10th A

Interstate 35W

22nd Street East

Elliot

Interstate 94

RampCo

s Aven

Peavey Park

erver1

klin11

klin_4

f_6f_I

xd | D

ate Sa

LegendI

Peavey Park0 50Feet

Peavey Park

0 50Feet

Packet Pg 219

TYPICAL SECTIONS

PEAVEY PARK

bmitbl

T47119807

ures119807_ts_02d

6302020

VARVAR

Packet Pg 220

Resolution 2020-289

Packet Pg 221

Packet Pg 222

Packet Pg 223

Packet Pg 224

RECITALS

Innovation District

Packet Pg 225

DECLARATION

Benefit Parcels

without limitation

Packet Pg 226

species

Enhancement

Packet Pg 227

Packet Pg 228

signage

Packet Pg 229

the Enhancements

Packet Pg 230

obligations

Packet Pg 231

such parties

is inadequate

Packet Pg 232

Packet Pg 233

and assessments

discretion

If to the

Maintenance

District

Attn Stephen Klimek

Packet Pg 234

to Operator

Packet Pg 235

____________________________________________

Notary Public

Suite 1500

(612) 340-2600

Packet Pg 236

Exhibit A-1

Packet Pg 237

Exhibit A-2

Parcel E1

Parcel E2

Parcel E3

Parcel E4

Parcel E5

Parcel E6

Parcel E7

Packet Pg 238

Exhibit B

[See attached]

Packet Pg 239

Location(s)

Packet Pg 240

Location(s)

Packet Pg 241

Location(s)

Packet Pg 242

Location(s)

Packet Pg 243

Location(s)

Packet Pg 244

Location(s)

Packet Pg 245

Location(s)

Packet Pg 246

Location(s)

Packet Pg 247

Location(s)

Packet Pg 248

Location(s)

Packet Pg 249

Location(s)

Packet Pg 250

Location(s)

Packet Pg 251

Location(s)

Packet Pg 252

Location(s)

Packet Pg 253

Location(s)

Packet Pg 254

Location(s)

Packet Pg 255

Location(s)

Packet Pg 256

Location(s)

Packet Pg 257

Location(s)

Landform Swing

Packet Pg 258

Location(s)

Landscape Lighting

Packet Pg 259

Location(s)

Packet Pg 260

Location(s) (TBC)

Packet Pg 261

Location(s) (TBC)

Packet Pg 262

Location(s)

Packet Pg 263

Location(s)

Responsible Parties

Packet Pg 264

Packet Pg 265

Exhibit C

Footage

Contributing

Share Share

680 00 000

E4 Aeon - The Louis 1500 1500 995

Totals 166492 15078 1000

Packet Pg 266

Exhibit D

First Budget

IncomeLineal Front

E4 Aeon - The Louis 15000 99 $596 $596 $596 $596 $2385 $596

Refunds $0 $0

Other $0 $0

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

Packet Pg 267

ExpensesSites

OfficeGeneral

Operator Fee $2000 $2000 $2000

Communications $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $300 $50

Insurance $625 $625 $625 $625 $2500 $625

Bad Debts $0 $0

Contingency $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $2400 $200

Packet Pg 268

([Owner])

STATE OF _____________ )

COUNTY OF ___________ )

_________________ the ________________ of _____________________ a ____________________

on behalf of the ___________________

Notary Public

Packet Pg 269

Packet Pg 270

Packet Pg 271

Full Agenda


I CALL TO ORDER

1 Roll Call








V ACTION ITEMS













VI STUDYREPORT ITEM



VII ADJOURNMENT

Appendix













Documents

Planning Committee 2117 West River Road N Minneapolis, MN