Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
TO: Clark County Councilors
FROM: Steve Morasch, Planning Commission Chair PREPARED BY: Gary Albrecht, AICP, Planner III
DATE: December 11, 2018
SUBJECT: CPZ 2018-00007 - NE 99th ST. EXTENSION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ARTERIAL ATLAS AMENDMENT
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION On August 16, 2018, the Planning Commission voted (3/2) to approve the staff recommendation to amend the Arterial Atlas alignment to Alternative F as seen on page 2. PROPOSED ACTION This proposed amendment is to amend the Arterial Atlas alignment to improve neighborhood circulation on NE 99th St. connecting between NE 87th Ave. and NE 72nd Ave.
BACKGROUND The county is proposing an amendment to the Arterial Atlas to improve the circulation of commercial and residential traffic. In 2018, Clark County received communication from the Washington Utility Transportation Commission (UTC) that indicated when approving a new public railroad crossing, UTC considers public necessity, convenience and safety. Current State Policy strongly discourages construction of new at-grade crossings unless no other viable alternatives exist. As a result of this new information, staff has worked with HDR Engineering to analyze alternative east-west connections on NE 99th St. to NE 72nd Ave., attached as Exhibit 1. NE 99th St. has been on the Arterial Atlas since 1996. It creates east and west circulation relieving future traffic congestion on NE 119th St. and Padden Parkway. The 2018-2023 Transportation Improvement Program identifies an improvement to NE 99th St. between NE 94th Ave. to the vicinity of NE 117th Ave. In 2009, the then Board of County Commissioners created a study that evaluated multiple alternatives for extending NE 99th St. from NE 87th Ave. to NE 72nd Ave., and then across I-205 connecting to NE St. Johns Rd. In 2012, the Clark County Clean Water Program completed the Curtain Creek Enhancement Project. A project fact sheet can be found at the following link: https://www.clark.wa.gov/sites/default/files/CurtinCreekEnhancement-7-12.pdf In 2016, the Clark County Council removed the extension of 99th St from St. Johns Rd. to 72nd Ave from the Arterial Atlas.
In 2017, the plan approval and beginning of construction of Taylor Transports Office and Shops along 101st that coincides with Alternative D (Clark County Engineering Case Eng2017-000192 and Planning Land Use Case PLD2016-00032). On June 14, 2018, a pre-application for development was submitted to Clark County on parcel number 155758000. This parcel includes a portion of one of the Alternative J (as describe below), which could have a small impact at the time of project development. Clark County Public works has indicated that this project can get future funding for this project. Capital improvements are occurring on NE 99th St. (NE 94th Ave. to vicinity of NE 117th Ave.); design is underway; construction in 2021 pending funding. A connection on NE 99th St. to NE 72nd Ave. is needed. ALTERNATIVE EAST-WEST CONNECTIONS: This proposed amendment is to amend the Arterial Atlas to improve neighborhood circulation on NE 99th St. connecting between NE 87th Ave. and NE 72nd Ave. There are four alternatives proposed as seen below and described as follows: F is the yellow line; J is the blue line; D is the red line that includes an over or under the railroad option. See map below.
• Alternative F crosses through Mountain View Estates subdivision on an existing dedicated right of way extending NE 99th St. crossing Curtin Creek and turns south before the existing Clark County railroad and connects into NE 72nd Ave.;
• Alternative J extends the existing NE 99th St. in an east/west direction and connects into NE 72nd Ave. immediately south of the NE 72nd at-grade railroad crossing.
• Alternative D connects the existing NE 99th St. through Mountain View Estates dedicated right of way via an overcrossing of Clark County railroad connecting into NE 101st St. at NE 72nd Ave.; and
• Alternative D connects the existing NE 99th St. through Mountain View Estates dedicated right of way via an undercrossing of Clark County railroad connecting into NE 101st St. at NE 72nd Ave.
All four alternatives require a bridge crossing Curtin Creek. In July 2012, Clark County completed the Curtin Creek Enhancement Project that included preparing the ground for a bridge crossing into the existing dedicated right-of-way. https://www.clark.wa.gov/sites/default/files/CurtinCreekEnhancement-7-12.pdf Alternative D overcrossing would require a bridge that is a minimum of 23’-6” high with an eight (8)
Page 2 of 9
percent grade starting at the intersection of NE 82nd Ave. along with the use of approach walls to minimize impacts to the neighborhood to the east. This alternative could possibly displace two (2) residential homes. Alternative D undercrossing would include going under the railroad tracks at a depth of approximately 17’-0” along with walls to minimize impacts to adjacent houses and stay within the existing right-of-Way through the neighborhood. This alternative could possibly displace two (2) residential homes. Alternative F curves to the south to miss the railroad and crosses NE 99th St. with a roundabout. This alternative could possibly displace one (1) residential home and one (1) business. Alternative J provides a direct connection on NE 99th St. crossing over a bridge on Curtin Creek connecting to NE 72nd Ave. This bridge crossing would require considerable environmental site mitigation to build a bridge at this location. This alternative could displace eight (8) residential homes and one (1) business.
Each alternative was evaluated to determine costs and Impacts of significant elements of work. The intent of determining costs and impacts was not to calculate an overall construction cost estimate but to compare significant elements of works by alternative. A detailed cost breakdown for each alternative can be found in Appendix H of Exhibit 1. All costs are based on 2018 costs. The costs shown should not be used a basis to determine overall construction cost. The following items were compared by alternative; • Construction Cost of major elements based on estimated costs. • Right of Way acquisition cost based on estimated costs. • Residential Property Impact based on the number of parcels impacted. • Environmental Impacts based on a quantitative analysis.
Each alternative was compared to each other and ranked on a score between 1 (the least) and 4 (the most). The costs and impacts below are weighted equally among all categories. The following table summarizes the comparison of costs by alternative.
Consultant Alternative Recommendations After evaluating each alternative per the criteria established in this memo, we recommend that the County further evaluate Alternative F for the following reasons; • Alternative F utilizes the pre-established corridor through Curtin Creek thus avoiding new
impacts.
Page 3 of 9
• Alternative F utilizes the County’s existing ROW west of Curtin Creek. • Alternative F avoids the cost of grade separating Clark County railroad. • Alternative F has grades that are more easily navigated by pedestrians and bicyclists. • Alternative F has the least impacts to existing residential homes. • Alternative F has the greatest separation from the Intersection of NE 72nd and Clark
County railroad. GENERAL INFORMATION: The proposed amendment is located in the Sunnyside neighborhood. Location: NE 99th St. from NE 87th Ave. to NE 72nd Ave. Existing land use: Light Industrial (IL), a n d Single-family Residential (R1-6), (R1-7.5). Capital improvements on NE 99th St. are in our 2018-2023 Transportation Improvement Program. Design is underway on NE 99th St. from NE 94th Ave. to the vicinity of NE 117th Ave. Construction is scheduled in 2021 pending funding. A connection on NE 99th St. to NE 72nd Ave. is needed to complete the 99th St. corridor. SUMMARY OF PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PROCESS Sixty-day notice notification was sent to the Department of Commerce on June 1, 2018, under RCW 36.70A.106. A Notice of Determination of Non-Significance and SEPA Environmental Checklist was published in the Columbian newspaper on July 17, 2018. A legal notice was published for the Planning Commission hearing on July 18, 2018. Public Hearing Notice was published in the Reflector and the Columbian newspapers on Wednesday, July 18, 2018. A postcard was mailed on July 19, 2018. A notice of application and hearing was posted on the property on July 31, 2018. The draft proposal was reviewed by the Development and Engineering Advisory Board on August 2, 2018. On August 2, 2018, Planning Commission held a work session on the draft proposal. Planning Commission held a hearing on August 16, 2018. On November 14, 2018, Council Hearing postcards were sent to approximately 1,100 property owners. On November 27, 2018 a legal notice was published for the County Council Hearing. On November 30, 2018 hearing notices were posted on the property. SUMMARY OF COMMENTS RECEIVED Staff held an Open House on April 6, 2018 from 5:00 – 7:00 pm at Barberton Grange, 9400 NE 72nd Ave. Approximately 1,150 property owner letters were mailed to property owners in the affected area. About 60 people attended the open house, and 37 signed in on the sign-in sheet. Below is a summary of the comments. Why are we discussing this map change right now? I/we don’t want any more growth. Do we need the railroad? I have lived here for many years and do not want additional traffic going through my neighborhood. How are the children going to get across NE 99th St. to the Sunset Elementary? Keep the traffic off of NE 99th St. and on NE 119th St. and NE 87th St. We are going to sue the county. My property values are doing to decrease. We enjoy the quite rural feeling around Curtin Creek. You’re going to destroy the wildlife and habitat around Curtin Creek. Several property owners in this neighborhood want the existing dedicated right of way turned into a park. Planning Commission Hearing postcards were sent to approximately 1,150 property owners on August 16, 2018. All public comments are included in the hearing binder.
Page 4 of 9
APPLICABLE CRITERIA, EVALUATION AND FINDINGS CRITERIA FOR ALL MAP CHANGES
A. “The proponent shall demonstrate that the proposed amendment is consistent with
the Growth Management Act (GMA) and requirements, the countywide planning policies, the Community Framework Plan, Comprehensive Plan, City Comprehensive Plans, Applicable Capital Facilities Plans and official population growth forecasts.” [CCC 40.560.010(G)(1)].
Growth Management Act (GMA) The GMA goals set the general direction for the county in adopting its framework plan and comprehensive plan policies. The GMA lists thirteen overall goals in RCW 36.70A.020 plus the shoreline goal added in RCW 36.70A.480(1). The goals are not listed in order of priority. The GMA goal that applies to the proposed action is Goal 3.
Goal #3 speaks directly to transportation issues to “encourage efficient, multi-modal transportation systems that are based on regional priorities and coordinated with county and city comprehensive plans.” [RCW 36.70A.020(1)]. RCW 36.70A.070(6) and WAC 365-196-430 Transportation Element section provides recommendations for meeting the element requirements. Under WAC 365-196-430(2)(b), “The transportation element should contain goals and policies to guide the development and implementation of the transportation element. The goals and policies should be consistent with statewide and regional goals and policies. Goals and policies should address the following:
(i) Roadways and Roadway design that provides safe access and travel for all users, including motorists, transit vehicles and riders, bicyclists and pedestrians;
(ii) Public transportation, including public transit and passenger rail, intermodal transfers and multimodal access;
(iii) Bicycle and pedestrian travel; (iv) Transportation demand management, including education, encouragement and law
enforcement strategies; (v) Freight mobility including port facilities, truck, air, rail and water-based freight; (vi) Transportation finance including strategies for addressing impacts of development
through concurrency, impact fees and other mitigation; and (vii) Policies to preserve the functionality of state highways within the local jurisdiction such as
policies to provide an adequate local network of streets, paths and transit service so that local short-range trips do not require single-occupant vehicle travel on the state highway system; and policies to mitigate traffic and stormwater impacts on state-owned transportation facilities as development occurs.”
Finding: The proposed recommended amendment is an important link in the transportation system which will maximize efficiency of the county’s roadway infrastructure for freight and vehicular traffic, maintaining regional mobility and therefore supports the comprehensive plan. This proposal contributes to the development and improvement of an interconnected transportation system. The existing and proposed functional classification of a two-lane minor arterial with center turn land and bike lanes supports both access and mobility, and is integrated with the land use plan as well as the Arterial Atlas by proposing future roads and classifications that serve the approved land use classifications. The recommended alternative is better for bikes and walkers, because they would not have to navigate a steep incline from an overpass or traversing an underpass onto NE 101st St.
Page 5 of 9
Community Framework Plan The Community Framework Plan (Framework Plan) provides guidance to local jurisdictions on regional land use and service issues. The Framework Plan encourages growth in centers, urban and rural, with each center separate and distinct from the others. The centers are oriented and developed around neighborhoods to allow residents to easily move through and to feel comfortable within areas that create a distinct sense of place and community. The Community Framework Plan policies applicable to this proposal include the following:
Goal 5.0 notes that “the community framework plan envisions a shift in emphases of transportation systems from private vehicles to public transit…. and non-polluting alternatives such as walking and biking.” [Framework Plan, page 17] The following transportation policies apply to the proposed action: 5.1.1 Encourage transportation systems that provide a variety of options (high capacity transit,
high-occupancy vehicles, buses, autos, bicycles or walking) within and between and rural centers.
5.1.2 Streets, pedestrian paths and bike paths are to be a part of a system of fully connected and scenic routes to all destinations. Establish design standards for development to promote these options and work cooperatively with C-TRAN to ensure that programs for improvements in transit service and facilities as well as roadway and pedestrian facilities are coordinated with these standards.
5.1.3 To reduce vehicle trips, encourage mixed land use and locate as many other activities as possible to be located within easy walking and bicycling distances from public transit stops.
5.1.4 Encourage use of alternative types of transportation, particularly those that reduce mobile emissions (bicycle, walking, carpools and public transit). [Framework Plan, page 17].
These framework plan policies are implemented by Clark County Code 40.350.030 St. and Rd. Standards. It is the purpose of this section to establish minimum standards for public and private transportation facilities for vehicles, public transit, pedestrians, and bicycles, hereinafter constructed or improved as a condition of county approval of a development, or a transportation project constructed by the county. These standards are intended to preserve the community’s quality of life and to minimize total costs over the life of the transportation facility.
Finding: The proposed recommended alternative encourages alternative types of transportation. In Alternative F, bikers and walkers could easily travel east and west from NE 87th Ave. to NE 72nd Ave., because they would not have to navigate a steep incline from an overpass or traversing an underpass onto NE 101st St. as required in Alternative D. This proposal contributes to the development and improvement of an interconnected transportation system. The existing and proposed functional classification of a two-lane minor arterial with center turn land and bike lanes supports both access and mobility, and is integrated with the land use plan as well as the Arterial Atlas by proposing future r o a d s and classifications that serve the approved land use classifications. The recommended alternative is better for bikes and walkers, because they would not have to navigate a steep incline from an overpass or traversing an underpass onto NE 101st St. The proposed street connection is an important link in the transportation system which will maximize efficiency by providing alternatives mode of transportation on the county’s roadway system for freight and vehicular traffic, maintaining regional mobility and therefore supports the framework plan.
Page 6 of 9
Countywide Planning Policies (CWPP) The GMA, under RCW 36.70A.210, requires counties and cities to collaboratively develop Countywide Planning Policies (CWPP) to govern the development of comprehensive plans. The WAC 365-196-305(1) defines “the primary purpose of CWPP is to ensure consistency between comprehensive plans of counties and cities sharing a common border or related regional issues. Another purpose of the CWPP is to facilitate the transformation of local governance in the urban growth areas, typically through annexation to or incorporation of a city, so that urban governmental services are primarily provided by cities and rural and regional services are provided by counties.”
Policy 5.0.1 states “Clark County, Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and the Regional Transportation Planning Organization (RTPO), state, bi-state, municipalities and C-TRAN shall work together to establish a truly regional transportation system which:
• reduces reliance on single occupancy vehicle transportation through development of a balanced transportation system which emphasizes transit, high capacity transit, bicycle and pedestrian improvements and transportation demand management;
• encourages energy efficiency; • recognizes financial constraints; and, • minimizes environmental impacts of the transportation systems development, operation and
maintenance.” [CWPP, page 151].
Finding: The proposed recommended alternative minimizes environmental impacts. In 2012, the Clark County Clean Water Program completed the Curtin Creek Enhancement Project. A project fact sheet can be found at the following link: https://www.clark.wa.gov/sites/default/files/CurtinCreekEnhancement-7-12.pdf. The 2012 improvements have maintained a potential corridor connecting to NE 101st St. from NE 99th St. that would make permitting easier. Public Works has also constructed an advanced mitigation site on the north side of 119th St. where credit can be used for this future phase of NE 99th St. The corridor currently contains a missing link between NE 87th Ave. to NE 72nd Ave. The completion of this link would add a new east-west connection that would serve thru traffic and provide access to commercial, industrial, office and residential developments and thus relieve some of the traffic pressure on NE 119th St. to the North, NE 87th St. and Padden Parkway to the South. Alternative F would also reduce to the reliance of single occupancy vehicles, since it is easier for bikers and walkers to travel through this segment of NE 99th St. Comprehensive Growth Management Plan 2015-2035 (2016 Plan) The 20-year Comprehensive Growth Management Plan contains many policies that guide urban form and efficient land use patterns. The most relevant goals and policies applicable to this application are as follows:
“Goal: Develop a multi-modal transportation system.
5.2.1 Roadway improvements which provide for additional capacity for the automobile
shall also accommodate alternative travel modes. 5.2.11 Promote bicycle and pedestrian safety and increased bicycling and walking through
safety and encouragement activities.” [2016 Plan, pages 153 and 154].
Finding: The proposed amendment as seen in Alternative F, provide circulation to NE 72nd Ave. is needed as the neighborhood develops to maintain mobility in the neighborhood and facilitate freight movements on regionally significant arterials. Exhibit 2 demonstrates PM peak period traffic modeling in 2035 that shows percent changes with the extension of NE 99th St. in Alternative F. Overall, traffic congestion is reduced on NE 119th St. and on NE 87th St. with this proposed connection. Alternative F would also reduce to the reliance of single occupancy vehicles, since it is
Page 7 of 9
easier for bikers and walkers to travel through this segment of NE 99th St.
Capital Facility Plan Transportation projects have a revenue perspective. The projected revenue sources include property taxes dedicated to transportation (“road fund”), gasoline tax distributions to the county, traffic impact fees, Public Works Trust Fund loans, expected other grants and miscellaneous revenue streams that accrue for transportation purposes. Finding: The existing road segment of NE 99th St., from NE 72nd Ave to NE 94th Ave, has been on the Arterial Atlas since 1993. The proposed recommended alternative and the existing extension of NE 99th St. from NE 87th Ave. to NE 72nd Ave. are not included in the Clark County 20-year Capital Facility Plan. However, the segment of NE 99th St. from NE 72nd Ave. to NE 94th Ave. was included in the 2007 Capital Facilities Plan. The segment of NE 99th St., from NE 72nd Ave to NE 94th Ave, was removed from the Capital Facilities Plan in 2014 when the level of service changed from time delay to volume-to-capacity. Clark County Public works has indicated that this project can get future funding for this project. Capital improvements are occurring on NE 99th St. (NE 94th Ave. to vicinity of NE 117th Ave.); design is underway; construction in 2021 pending funding. A connection on NE 99th St. to NE 72nd Ave. is needed. CRITERIA FOR ARTERIAL ATLAS AMENDMENTS
B. “Arterial Atlas amendments shall be accomplished through the changes initiated and approved by the county. These changes may occur as part of the periodic review update to occur consistent with RCW 36.70A.130, or as part of annual changes to the plan once per calendar year, or as part of emergency amendments which may be brought forward at any time, subject to applicable provisions of this chapter.” [CCC 40.560.010(O)(1)]. “Required Criteria. Arterial Atlas amendments may be approved only when all of the following are met:
a. There is a need for the proposed change; b. The proposed change is compliant with the Growth Management Act; c. The proposed change is consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan, including the
land use plan and the rest of the Arterial Atlas; d. The proposed change is consistent with applicable interlocal agreements; and e. The proposed change does not conflict with the adopted Metropolitan Transportation
Plan.” [CCC 40.560.010(O)(2)]. Finding: The road segment of NE 99th St. from NE 72nd Ave. to NE 94th Ave. has been on the Arterial Atlas since 1993. The segment of NE 99th St. from St. Johns Rd. to NE 72nd Ave. was removed from the Arterial Atlas in 2016, due to development that precluded the construction of the future M-2cb. The WA Utilities and Transportation Commission have indicated that a grade separated crossing with the Chelatchie Prairie Rail Road would be required. There has not been any development that has precluded the construction of the segment of NE 99th St., from NE 72nd Ave to NE 94th Ave. NE 119th St., NE 117th Ave. (SR-503), NE 72nd Ave., and NE Padden Parkway are identified in the Regional Transportation Plan as part of the Regional Transportation System. Improvements along NE 119th St. have recently been completed to add greater mobility to the regional route. This proposal contributes to the development and improvement of an interconnected transportation system. The existing and proposed functional classification of a two-lane minor arterial with center turn land and bike lanes supports both access and mobility, and is integrated with the land use plan
Page 8 of 9
as well as the Arterial Atlas by proposing future roads and classifications that serve the approved land use classifications. The corridor currently contains a missing link between NE 87th Ave. to NE 72nd Ave. The completion of this link would add a new east-west connection that would serve thru traffic and provide access to commercial, industrial, office and residential developments and thus relieve some of the traffic pressure on NE 119th St. to the North, NE 87th St. and Padden Parkway to the South. The recommended alternative provides circulation to NE 72nd Ave., which is needed as the neighborhood develops to maintain mobility in the neighborhood and facilitate freight movements on regionally significant arterials. Exhibit 2 demonstrates PM peak period traffic modeling in 2035 that shows percent changes with the extension of NE 99th St. in Alternative F. Overall, traffic congestion is reduced on NE 119th St. and on NE 87th St. with this proposed connection. There are no interlocal agreements which directly apply to this proposal, and the proposed change does not conflict with the adopted Regional Transportation Plan. RECOMMENDATION AND CONCLUSIONS Based on the information and findings presented in this report and in supporting documents, the Planning Commission forwards a recommendation for Clark County Council to APPROVE Alternative F as the proposed alignment amendment to the Arterial Atlas. The following table lists the applicable criterion and summarizes the findings.
COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE CRITERIA
Criteria for Arterial Atlas Changes
Criteria Met?
Staff Report Planning Commission
A. Compliance with GMA Yes Yes B. Compliance with Arterial Atlas Amendments Yes Yes
Recommendation: APPROVE APPROVE
Page 9 of 9
9470 CT
92
LN
65 C
T
53
CR113
STJO
H NS
82 CT
CT
94
93
106
113
CR75
CR74
51
MANORDR
47 C
T
49 C
T
ST
73
GLENWOOD
CT
CT46
46
51CT
67
45
104
GLENWOODDR
95WY
95 ST
11 4
90PL
87 CT CT88
ST84thNE
104 94
95
105
106
106
85
PL10
7th10
5
100 CT
67
47CT98
CT46
97
97
72CR
97
78
ANDR
ESEN
60
JOHNSRD
64
5596 98
CT93
CR101
95
90CR
55
88th
91st
10190
99th100 100
107
53 CT
CT
112CR
113
54
WY
SUNNYSIDE
78th ST
8181
CT
92
89 CT
AVE
NE
94th
81 LP
107 63 CT ST
103 CR
61 PL
55 CT101 ST100
CR
CT54
99
59 98
100CR
BANTON AV
ERIN WY
BLUEBERRY50
MAITLA
NDRD
106 62CT
94 C
T
CornerstoneChristianSchool
(#205/30P)
RD
47
CR72
62CT
PL
64
CR
89
87 87
CR86
74
57 CT CR76 FIVE
CORNERS
8371
RD
7877CRCR
104
78
103
102
ST
126 CR 48
9145 PL
47
WY 47RD
PL91
CR82NE (#339)
47th
NEAV
E
Sunset El
Silver Star El
MEADO
WSCT
73 CR
COVINGTON
6970
10569
6766 AV
E
CR70
80CR
76th
CR
LP
CR89
WY
81 WY
CR
CR
99th
100
CR
CR
106 WY
CR
CR
68th
123rd121 WY
SUNSET WY
103CR
113 CR
111 WY
LAUR
INRD
ST
90CT
87th
NE
CR123
122
111 CR
CT47
C R
CT
76th
69
83CT83
126th
70 CR
WY83 CR
CT97
87th93
PL
92
86 WY 103rd
105
9293rd
81st
82nd
65CT
WILDING RD
CR94 56
59 97 60 61CT
DRLALONDE
91
90
110 CR
89 9 0
99th
72nd
AVE
114th
115
116
96th
102n
d
103rd
105th104th
99th
AVE
126 CT
105 C
T
ISSLE R
53
69
DR
130th
129th CR128 ST
72
86CT
48
45 120
121
47
50th
AVE
7 0th
75th
71
52nd
CT
55th
77CR
64CT
ST119th
105CR
71
99 CT
CT
46
WalnutGrove
5251
ST
112CR
112CR
10097
75CR
WY76 99
75WY
75
KingsLandPk
9090thNE ST
67CR
Covington Park(u)
Sunset(u)
Greyhawk Park
Curtin Creek Park (u)
CR66
PL53
Cree
kCu
rtin
53
96 CR
56CT
8988th
CR85
CR84
104
98
CT
CR67CR
72PL
78 CR
124
The Language Academy
Green MeadowsGolf Course
Clark County Operations
Haze
l Dell
Sewe
r
CT
117
56
72 CR
52
57
67 WY
68
73
65 PL
72CR
76 CR
76 8787CR
80 CT
CR92
83CT
104CR
102 CR
CR101 81 82
CR100 99CR
105
103
90CT
91
CR106 106
104
103
93
92ND
90 PL
9 1PL91 91
91
ST85 86
919090PL
WY86 86thDR
77
81
102
AV
94
76CR
79 79
93
85 CR
101
93
CR97
101st
104th
102nd
100 WY
102
104103
98
95 98
102
100
9697 CT95 CT
101 ST100 ST
99 ST
104
105
104 CT
105
97
104
90
104
105 CR89
86th
106
85105
84
106 CT
105 CT
10510275 WY 75 PL
71
7172CR 72CR
70CR
(North)
45 46
5051
76
101st
AVE
53
6969CR
CR CR
54 55th 56
71
70
68
AVE
75th
71st
NE
NE 57
CT
NE 123rd
131
93rd
94th
Blueb
erry
KelleyMeadows(u)
128th
131st
NE 93
rd AV
E
WY126
62nd
95th
BARBERTON
89 ST
80th
79CT
8 7th
AVE
MEADOWSDR
45
130
44
131 WY
68
102
115 ST
68th
45th
CT50
93
11346
114th114
45
106105 CR
103104
53rd
84th
64th
NEST
91
84 CT
AVE
8 0th 94
9695
82
96th
95thNE
90th
91st
87 C
T 8 8th 91
CT92
87
62nd
AVE
67th
94th101
9392nd
102nd
88th
86th
86th CT
86th
87CR
89
44
CT
112 CR
NE 68th
67 66
6667
70th
70
60
69 73
75
62nd
63rd
74
NE
AVE
46
132nd
NE 127th WYNE 127th ST
127 WY
43 CT
52
11846PL
4 5PL
107106 ST
6868
70 CT104 104 WY
67 68 69105CR
106CR
NE 65
108WY
NE 120120CIR
121WY
122 59 C
T123
LaLo
nde C
reek P
ark
87 CT
66CR
102
A
VE
116 CR
114 CR
123
49 P
L
CR125
50th
114th
112th54t h
5 3C T
112th65
thAV
E114
AVE
64th
100 CR
64th
64
CENT ERPO
INT
DR
73rd
FAIRWAY
74
7471st
75 69 ST
129
127
58
128CR
126CR125CR
59
54 CT
56 68
7154 P
L
76 54 7777
66
6674
64
CT
72CR
67
69CR 65
ST
62 CT
73CR
61st
70
61 PL
111WY
61 CT
56th
AV
E121WY
122
AVE
58th
61st
AVE
69CR 6967
69
71
44 45
126
95
106th
98
103rd
109th 109th110th
7 0th
AVE
110
58th
111
115116th117118
56th
60
101 CR102nd103 104th
86th
78
103
CT
81
101
7978
96
102
83rd
104
100th
75th
69
70th
61
104
PAR
LANEP AR
LN69thST
80th
NE 73rd
NE
95th
94th
111
95 P
L
109
96 CT
130NE
57th
A
VE
132nd WY133CR
56
125th
124th STNE124CR
53
66
WY
132
80
77th
ST
Curtin SpringsWildlifeHabitat
105th
92nd
133rd
51st
51
90
85 85CR50 CT
51C T
Padden Parkway Trail
49 CT
98
69th
100
106 WY
88th88CR
10948
110CR
110
47 112
117
113
54 C
T
133132131 60 61
WALNUTGROVE
102n
d
108 103
CT
86th
PARKWAY
82nd
868 7
82nd
DR
87 90818079
9192
91
93
75
74
88
7273
92
91
74WY
89
77
88
90 NE 71
68
103
73rd
101
69
74th
83 CTPADDEN
67
7473
67thNE
77104th WY
99
99
102
67WY
73CR
74CR
6666
71
NE
129th
62
97th
AVE
107th
99th
109WY
108 100
100
CT
CurtinCreekNatural Area
WildingNaturalArea
NorthmorNaturalArea
GaddisWetlandsNaturalArea
112 CR
72 PL
!
0 1,000 2,000Feet
!
Printed on: June 14, 2018
Developer's Packet: Page 1 of 28Information shown on this map was collected fromseveral sources. Clark County accepts no responsibilityfor any inaccuracies that may be present.
General Location119490000, 119510000, 119535000, 119501000MUTUAL MATERIALS COMPANYPO BOX 2009 BELLEVUE, WA 98009
Account:Owner:Address:C/S/Z:
! Location of Subject Property(s)
4,285.7
25,714
4,285.7
Aerial Map
This map was generated by Clark County's "MapsOnline" website. Clark County does not warrant the accuracy, reliability or timeliness of any information on this map, and shall not be held liable for losses caused by using this information.Clark County, WA. GIS - http://gis.clark.wa.gov
3,003.9
WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere
Feet3,003.90 1,501.93
Notes:
Legend
18,0231:
County Outline
_Highway
Interstate
State Route
Arterial
Forest Arterial
_Arterial
Interstate
State Route
Arterial
Forest Arterial
Minor Collector
Forest Collector
Private or Other
_Collector
_Other
Stream Channels
Major Waterbodies
Rural Centers
Cities Boundaries
Urban Growth Boundaries
County Boundary
4,285.7
25,714
4,285.7
Comp Plan Map
This map was generated by Clark County's "MapsOnline" website. Clark County does not warrant the accuracy, reliability or timeliness of any information on this map, and shall not be held liable for losses caused by using this information.Clark County, WA. GIS - http://gis.clark.wa.gov
3,003.9
WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere
Feet3,003.90 1,501.93
Notes:
Legend
18,0231:
Comprehensive Plan - Outline
Comprehensive Plan - Outline_labels
Comprehensive Plan
Urban Low Density Residential
Urban Medium Density Residential
Urban High Density Residential
Mixed Use
Commercial
Industrial
Heavy Industrial
Public Facility
Bonneville Power Administration
Mixed use - Residential
Mixed use - Employment
Downtown
Neighborhood Commercial
Community Commercial
General Commercial
Regional Center
Employment
Employment Campus
Light Industrial
Single-Family_Low
Single-Family_Medium
Single-Family_High
Multi-Family_Low
Multi-Family_High
Light industrial/Business park
Park
Open space/Green space
Town Center
City Center
Office Park/Business Park
Rural-5
4,285.7
25,714
4,285.7
Zoning Map
This map was generated by Clark County's "MapsOnline" website. Clark County does not warrant the accuracy, reliability or timeliness of any information on this map, and shall not be held liable for losses caused by using this information.Clark County, WA. GIS - http://gis.clark.wa.gov
3,003.9
WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere
Feet3,003.90 1,501.93
Notes:
Legend
18,0231:
Zoning - Outline
Zoning - Outline_labels
Zoning
Single-Family residential (R1-20, R-20)
Single-Family residential (R1-15, R-15)
Single-Family residential - 12 (R-12)
Single-Family residential (R1-10, R-10, R10)
Single-Family residential (R1-7.5, R-7.5, LDR-7.5)
Single-Family residential (R1-6, R-6, LDR-6)
Single-Family residential (R1-5)
Residential (R-12, R12)
Residential (R-18, MF-18)
Residential (R-22, AR-22)
Residential (R-30)
Residential (R-43)
Office residential-15 (OR-15)
Office residential-18 (OR-18)
Office residential-22 (OR-22)
Office residential-30 (OR-30)
Office residential-43 (OR-43)
Neighborhood commercial (NC, C1, CN, CNB)
Community commercial (CC, C2, CCB)
General commercial (GC, CG)
Mixed use (MX)
Business park (BP, OFF)
Light industrial (IL, ML, LI, IND, LI/EC)
Heavy industrial (IH, MH, HI)
University (U)
Airport (A)
Public facilities (PF, IP, UP)
Rural-5 (R-5)
Rural-10 (R-10)
Rural-20 (R-20)
Rural center residential 1 ac min (RC-1)