Upload
phamnga
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
THE USE OF CUE CARDS TO IMPROVE THE SPEAKING
ABILITY OF THE STUDENTS IN X “KIMIA INDUSTRI”
SMK NEGERI 2 DEPOK
A SARJANA PENDIDIKAN THESIS
Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
to Obtain the Sarjana Pendidikan Degree
in English Language Education
By
Paulina Besty Fortinasari
Student Number: 101214089
ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM
DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGE AND ARTS EDUCATION
FACULTY OF TEACHERS TRAINING AND EDUCATION
SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY
YOGYAKARTA
2015
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
i
THE USE OF CUE CARDS TO IMPROVE THE SPEAKING
ABILITY OF THE STUDENTS IN X “KIMIA INDUSTRI”
SMK NEGERI 2 DEPOK
A SARJANA PENDIDIKAN THESIS
Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
to Obtain the Sarjana Pendidikan Degree
in English Language Education
By
Paulina Besty Fortinasari
Student Number: 101214089
ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM
DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGE AND ARTS EDUCATION
FACULTY OF TEACHERS TRAINING AND EDUCATION
SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY
YOGYAKARTA
2015
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
Advisor
A助ヴακα P`4ご′グ滅務″Thesls oll
TEE USE OFCUE CARDSTO MROヽ 電 TΠR SPEAttGABILITY OF TヨE STUDENTSIN X“ Iコ硼И fⅣDrTRP'
OF戯萄〔Aぼ爾 2D」P6X
iida Yulia,S Pd p NIIPd 22 JanuaryZ}l5
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
|■・、1 1・ ■「||■ .:|‐ ‐|:|■ |■ ,,1
::,31::■ ■ I: こ・1「:キ 亀霊いヽ 1辱 :ミ :ヽデ霊11ヽ 1 ::書 き
'`
ヨ111お :ヽ く:
tζ嬌電:彗 lで11:種『 ヽ:l監 :ゝ:` :ヽ :し ・ヽ・桑■″`´
|■ ■IIギ r・・
(事 ざ -71′ ム ≒:|:■ 二lt′ tr fili∵lイ ドユ
: |||| |1111:‐ ||||||・ |■ |||
li :.|.| .:1.=| | : ‐・ ‐
i :,r I -'
'., .- .',.1: ,
":
I .
!:、 、そ|,11,||:1ヽ 11■ :IⅢ |́‐
|| |■ . . |li‐:‐ i・ |||
||' 11,■ |||■ ■ 1111 :■ ll
■ | | く■ ■ i: ‐1 11■ ■
■ | 11■ 111■ ■ ‐ |||| :■ ||
・● :|■ |‐ ■ |■ ■ | '11■
`‐||■
I ⅢⅢ
/_ク ~
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
iv
I dedicate this thesis to:
My Jesus Christ, my beloved ones whom I mentioned in the
acknowledgements, and everybody who believes the art of teaching
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
STATEPIENT OF WORK'S ORIGNALITY
I honestly declare that this thesis, which I have written, does not contain the workor parts of the work of other people, except those cited in the quotatians aridthereferences, as a scientific paper should.
Yogyakarla, 5 Februar], 2015
Paulina Besty Fortinasari
101214089
The Writer
V
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
LEl■IBAR PERNYATAAN PERSETUJUANPUBIJIKASI KAIRYA ILⅣ IIAII UNTUK KEPENTINGAN AKADEⅣ IIS
Yang beltanda tangan di ba、 vah iniっ saya lYlahasis、 va lJniversitas Sanata Dharlllal
Nama
Nomor Mahasiswa
:Pa■llina Besty Fortinasari
:101214089
Demi pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan saya memberikan kepada Perpustakaan
Universitas Sanata Dharmakarya ilmiah sayayang berjudul .
THE IISE OF CUE CARIDS TO IMPROVE THE SPEAKINGABILITY OF TⅡ E STUDENTSIN X``翻 列し4カVDじl'留P'
OF IWttrハ「E(〕ERr2 1)EPθ F
beselta alat yang diperlukan(bila ada)Dengan delllikian saya mellabe」 kan
kepada Perpustakaan Universitas Sanata Dharma hak untuk llllenyimpan)
mengalihkan dalam belltuk media lain, 1■ el■golahnya dalam bel■tllk pan3kalan
data,IYlendistribusikan sccara terbatas,dan mempublikasikannnya di lnternct atau
media lain untuk kepentingan akadclllis tanpa perlu mcminta ttin dari saya
maupun lllelllberikan foyalti kepada saya, selama tetap lllencanttlmk‐ an nama saya
sebagai penulis
Dcnllkian pernyataan inl saya buat dellgan sebenarnva
Dibuat di Yogyakarta
Pada tanggal:5 Febltlari 20i 5
Paulina Bestv Fortinasari
Vl
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
vii
ABSTRACT
Fortinasari, Paulina Besty. (2015). The Use of Cue Cards to Improve the Speaking
Ability of the Students in X “Kimia Industri” of SMK Negeri 2 Depok.
Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University.
It is important for vocational students to adequately master the competence
of speaking skill since they will be part of the global era community. However,
many vocational students consider that speaking in English is difficult. The
students in X Kimia Industri of SMK Negeri 2 Depok also experienced the same
thing. They did not have enough time to practice and were not accustomed to
speaking English. They also had very limited English vocabulary and could not
develop their ideas about what they were going to speak in the conversation. For
that reason, the students were not confident to speak in English. The students
admitted speaking in English was very hard and scary.
This research aimed to help the students in X Kimia Industri of SMK
Negeri 2 Depok overcome the problem of developing ideas during the speaking by
proposing and using the cue cards. Cue cards which contained texts or pictures
could motivate the students to speak confidently. The problem that the researcher
proposed was how do cue cards help X Kimia Industri (X KI) students in SMK
Negeri 2 Depok to improve their speaking skill.
This research was in essence Classroom Action Research (CAR). The
research participants were 32 students in X Kimia Industri of SMK Negeri 2
Depok, Sleman, Yogyakarta in the 2014/2015 academic year. There were three
cycles in this research. Cycle one consisted of one meeting while cycle two and
cycle three consisted of two meetings respectively. Cycle one focused on
conditioning the students to speak in English. Cycle two and cycle three focused
on developing the students’ ideas during the speaking activity. There were five
instruments used to gather data, namely field notes, observation checklist,
questionnaires, interview, and speaking tests.
The data gathered were analyzed using data triangulation. Through the
interview and questionnaire, the students admitted that they felt more confident in
speaking English. They were more accustomed to speaking in English and not
afraid of making mistakes. The students could develop their ideas for speaking so
they could speak fluently and naturally. In addition, the students’ speaking scores
were improved from cycle one until cycle three. The average of the speaking
scores in cycle one until cycle three were 69.17, 75.30 and 81.40. In the students’
speaking scores, the improvement of their skill aspects was also followed by their
improvement of their attitude aspects, for example they were more polite when
they spoke to the peers and teacher. They were also more enthusiastic in learning
English. From the data analysis, it was concluded that cue cards could help the
students in X Kimia Industri of SMK Negeri 2 Depok solve their problems in
English speaking.
Keywords: classroom action research, speaking skills, cue cards
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
viii
ABSTRAK
Fortinasari, Paulina Besty. (2015). The Use of Cue Cards to Improve the Speaking
Ability of the Students in X “Kimia Industri” of SMK Negeri 2 Depok.
Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University.
Menguasai ketrampilan berbicara sangat diperlukan oleh siswa sekolah
kejuruan karena mereka diharapkan bisa berpartisipasi pada era globalisasi.
Namun banyak siswa sekolah kejuruan menganggap berbicara Bahasa Inggris
sulit. Kesulitan tersebut juga dialami oleh siswa di kelas X Kimia Industri SMK
Negeri 2 Depok. Para siswa tidak memiliki banyak waktu untuk berlatih
berbicara sehingga mereka tidak terbiasa berbicara Bahasa Inggris. Para siswa
juga tidak memiliki perbendaharaan kosakata Bahasa Inggris yang cukup
sehingga mereka tidak bisa mengembangkan ide. Hal ini membuat mereka tidak
percaya diri untuk berbicara Bahasa Inggris dan menganggap berbicara Bahasa
Inggris adalah hal yang menakutkan.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengatasi permasalahan terkait
kemampuan berbicara siswa di kelas X Kimia Industri di SMK Negeri 2 Depok.
Cue cards dipilih sebagai solusi untuk mengatasi masalah tersebut. Cue cards
yang dikombinasikan dengan teknik pengajaran ketrampilan berbicara tertentu
dapat mendorong siswa untuk belajar dan membuat mereka percaya diri.
Permasalahan yang ingin diselesaikan oleh peneliti adalah bagaimana cue cards
dapat membantu siswa di kelas X Kimia Industri di SMK Negeri 2 Depok
meningkatkan kemampuan berbicara mereka.
Penelitian ini adalah Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Responden penelitian ini
adalah 32 siswa dari kelas X Kimia Industri di SMK Negeri 2 Depok, Sleman,
Yogyakarta pada tahun ajaran 2014/2015. Penelitian ini terdiri dari tiga siklus.
Siklus pertama dapat diselesaikan dalam satu pertemuan sedangkan siklus kedua
dan ketiga dapat diselesaikan masing-masing dalam dua pertemuan. Instrumen
penelitian yang digunakan untuk mengumpulkan data yaitu lembar observasi,
catatan lapangan, kuesioner, wawancara dan ujian lisan.
Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa cue cards dapat membantu siswa
di kelas X Kimia Industri di SMK Negeri 2 Depok mengatasi permasalahan dalam
ketrampilan berbicara. Melalui kuisioner yang didistribusikan dan wawancara
yang dilakukan oleh peneliti, siswa mengaku lebih percaya diri dan tidak takut
lagi untuk berbicara Bahasa Inggris. Siswa dapat mengembangkan ide tentang
apa yang sedang dibicarakan dengan mudah. Rata-rata nilai tes berbicara dari
siklus satu hingga siklus tiga adalah 69.17, 75.30 dan 81.40. Meningkatnya aspek
ketrampilan ternyata diikuti dengan meningkatnya aspek sikap. Mereka lebih
sopan dalam berbicara dengan teman maupun guru serta lebih bersemangat
dalam mengikuti pelajaran Bahasa Inggris.
Kata kunci: classroom action research, speaking skills, cue cards
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
ix
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
My greatest gratitude goes to My Jesus Christ, for His marvelous grace,
everlasting love and endless guidance throughout my life. Without Him, I could
not have passed the hard times in completing my thesis.
I am particularly indebted to Made Frida Yulia, S.Pd., M.Pd., as my
advisor, who has been willing to devote her valuable time to read, correct and give
suggestions to my thesis patiently. I would like to send my gratitude to all PBI
lecturers who have shared their knowledge and wisdom. Without them, I would
not finish my thesis.
It is an honor for me to thank the teachers and staff of SMK Negeri 2
Depok for their hospitality and help when I was doing my research. I personally
thank Heri Afrahatu, S.Pd. for her patience, encouragement, and chance so I
could conduct the research in her class and finish my thesis. My sincere gratitude
is also sent to the students in X Kimia Industri of SMK Negeri 2 Depok
academic year 2014/2015 who enthusiastically responded and became the
participant for the whole steps of finishing this thesis. They have given me
inspiration in teaching.
I am greatly indebted to my beloved parents Yohanes Pemandi Suparjo
and Margareta Susilawati for their love, trust, prayer and endless support. I owe
my beloved little sister Patricia Dwi Harmani, who always gives me spirit and
energy to complete this thesis. My special gratitude also goes to Erlangga Madya
Pratama for his attention and motivation to enjoy every single step of finishing
this thesis.
I am really grateful to my beloved friends in the English Language
Education Study Program 2010 who show wonderful friendship and a lot of
meaningful values of life. My deepest thank goes to Riska, Paula, Arnis, Rini,
Gaby, Galuh, Venni, Regita, Wisnu, Ardi, Marino, Yulia, Tito, Yoga, Kapuk
Estu, Ratri, Siwi, Vina, Jipi Siska, Fani, and Mela for coloring my study with
laugh and love. I also appreciate the togetherness of all friends, seniors, and
juniors in PBI and the other study programs.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
x
I also express my gratitude to teachers and staff in ALPHA English
Course and Realia Language Culture Center for giving me precious
experiences in teaching. I thank them for the sharing, support and understanding.
Lastly, I thank everyone whom I cannot mention one by one for their help
and support.
Paulina Besty Fortinasari
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
TITLE PAGE …………………………………………………………. i
APPROVAL PAGES …………………………………………………. ii
DEDICATION PAGE ………………………………………………… iv
STATEMENT OF WORK’S ORIGINALITY ……………………….. v
PERNYATAAN PERSETUJUAN PUBLIKASI ………………………... vi
ABSTRACT …………………………………………………………... vii
ABSTRAK ……………………………………………………………... viii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.…………………………………………... ix
TABLE OF CONTENTS ...………………………………………….... xi
LIST OF TABLES ...…………………………………………............... xiv
LIST OF FIGURES ..………………………………………….............. xv
LIST OF APPENDICES ……………………………………................ xvi
CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION
A. Research Background …........................................... 1
B. Research Problem …................................................. 5
C. Problem Formulation …............................................ 6
D. Research Objective …............................................... 7
E. Research Benefits….................................................. 7
F. Definition of Terms ….............................................. 9
CHAPTER II. REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
A. Theoretical Description …........................................ 11
1. The Nature of Speaking ….................................. 12
a. The Definition of Speaking …........................ 12
b. The Characteristics of Speaking …................ 13
c. The Types of Speaking …............................... 13
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xii
d. Speaking Accuracy and Fluency …................ 15
2. Teaching Speaking ….......................................... 16
a. The Nature of Teaching Speaking .................. 16
b. The Aims of Teaching Speaking …................ 18
c. The Problems in Teaching Speaking .............. 18
d. The Principles of Teaching Speaking ............. 20
3. The Use of Cue Cards as Teaching Media …..... 24
a. The Nature of Cue Cards ................................ 24
b. The Advantages of Using Cue Cards ............. 25
c. Speaking Activities Using Cue Cards ............. 26
4. English for Vocational School
in the 2013 Curriculum ........................................ 30
B. Theoretical Framework …........................................... 33
CHAPTER III. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
A. Research Method ….................................................. 36
B. Research Setting ..…................................................. 39
C. Research Participants................................................. 39
D. Instruments and Data Gathering Technique ............. 40
E. Data Analysis Technique .......................................... 47
F. Research Procedure …............................................... 51
CHAPTER IV. RESEARCH RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A. The Description of the Use of Cue Cards ................ 53
1. Cycle One ............................................................ 55
2. Cycle Two ............................................................ 69
3. Cycle Three .......................................................... 82
B. Contribution of Cue Cards
to Improve the Students’ Speaking Ability ............. 94
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xiii
CHAPTER V. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Conclusions ….......................................................... 101
B. Recommendations..….............................................. 102
REFERENCES ……………………………………………………….. 104
APPENDICES ………………………………………………………... 107
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xiv
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
Table 3.1 The Rubric for Speaking Tests……..……………………….. 46
Table 4.1 The Students’ Speaking Scores
before the Implementation of Cue Cards ..…………………. 56
Table 4.2 The Students’ Speaking Scores in Cycle One ……………… 66
Table 4.3 The Results of the Questionnaire in Cycle One….…………. 68
Table 4.4 The Students’ Speaking Scores in Cycle Two ……………… 81
Table 4.5 The Results of the Questionnaire in Cycle Two….…………. 82
Table 4.6 The Students’ Speaking Scores in Cycle Three …………….. 92
Table 4.7 The Results of the Questionnaire in Cycle Two….…………. 93
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xv
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
Figure 3.1 Kemmis’s Approach to Classroom Action Research ………. 37
Figure 4.1 A Cue Card in Cycle 1 .…....………………………………... 62
Figure 4.2 The Illustration of the Conversation ……..…………………. 63
Figure 4.3 A Cue Card in Cycle 2 ……..……………………………….. 74
Figure 4.4 The Illustration of the Conversation .……..………………… 75
Figure 4.5 Communication Cards in Cycle 2 …………………………... 77
Figure 4.6 A Cue Card in Cycle 3………………………………………. 87
Figure 4.7 The Illustration of the Conversation ……..…………………. 88
Figure 4.8 Communication Cards in Cycle 3 ..…………………………. 89
Figure 4.9 The Comparison of the Students’ Speaking
Scores from Cycle One until Cycle Three …………………... 97
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xvi
LIST OF APPENDICES
Page
Appendix 1 Letters of Permission ………………………………….. 108
Appendix 2 Lesson Plan of Cycle One ...…...……………………… 111
Appendix 3 Lesson Plan of Cycle Two…...………………………… 129
Appendix 4 Lesson Plan of Cycle Three ...…………………………. 149
Appendix 5 The Blue Print of Questionnaire ………………………. 171
Appendix 6 The Sample of Questionnaire ………………..………… 174
Appendix 7 The Raw Data of Questionnaire..………………………. 177
Appendix 8 The Interview Guide Used
before the Implementation of Cue Cards ………………. 187
Appendix 9 The Summary of Interview
Conducted before the Implementation of Cue Cards…… 189
Appendix 10 The Interview Guide Used
after the Implementation of Cue Cards .………………… 192
Appendix 11 The Summary of Interview Conducted
after the Implementation of Cue Cards ............................. 194
Appendix 12 Observation Checklists ……………….…..……………... 198
Appendix 13 Field Notes ……………….…..………………………... .. 204
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
1
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
In this chapter, the researcher would like to discuss six major points. Those
include research background, research problem, problem limitation, research
objectives, research benefits and definition of terms. Further, the discussion about
each part of this chapter will be presented below.
A. Research Background
According to Harmer (2007, p. 13), English has been used by many people
in this world as an international means of communication. It is spoken in many
countries in this world and used to communicate in various fields such as
business, finance, politics, industry and education. Based on that phenomenon,
most Indonesians want to be able to speak English well.
Since the 1994 Curriculum being applied, Depdiknas has included English
as the compulsory subject in all stages of education in Indonesia. All of the
students are expected to learn English. By acquiring English, students can
communicate with other people around the world. However, the students are
demanded to master English skills to have communication in English. There are
four skills that should be mastered, namely listening, writing, reading and
speaking skill.
From those skills, speaking is classified as productive skill which then
becomes the most important skill to be actively involved in oral communication.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
2
Walter (2004, p. 204) states that the ability to use a language in communication is
more important than to understand the language. Therefore, when students are
learning English, the students not only comprehend the language but also show
the ability to use the language in oral communication. Speaking skill is the ability
which shows that the students can use the language in oral communication.
However, many people consider that speaking English is very difficult.
Bailey (1994) as cited by Nunan (2003, p. 48) states that speaking in a new
language is harder than reading, writing, and listening. This consideration is
caused by two reasons. The first reason is that speaking happens in real time.
When two people are talking, the first person is speaking and second one is
listening and waiting for the first person to speak right then. The second reason is
when people are speaking, they cannot revise and edit what they have spoken. In
addition, when people speak fluently, people are demanded to be able to speak in
a range of different genres and situations. Harmer (2007, p. 343) states besides the
ability to pronounce words correctly and use appropriate intonation patterns, the
ability to speak in a range of different genres and situations is needed. Those
abilities are needed to be able to survive in typical functional exchanges.
The condition of considering that learning speaking English is very difficult
was also found in SMK Negeri 2 Depok. Most of the vocational students also
considered that speaking was the most difficult skill. Through the observation that
was done by the researcher, the students admitted that speaking was very hard.
Most of the students were shy and afraid of making mistakes to speak English.
The students realized when they were speaking, they were demanded to use
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
3
grammar, pronunciation and dictions appropriately. In addition, the students
admitted that speaking in spontaneous condition was very difficult, for example
on daily conversation. The students realized that sometimes they did not have any
idea about what they were going to speak in the conversation. The students
realized that their vocabulary range was limited.
During the observations, the researcher also found that the students in SMK
Negeri 2 Depok tended to speak in Indonesian or local language although they
were studying English. When the students wanted to go to the restroom, they
tended to ask permission in Indonesian. If the students were asked to say it in
English, they did not know what the appropriate expressions of asking for
permission were. Students also tended to answer the teacher’ questions in
Indonesian or local language rather in English although the teacher had asked the
questions in English. On the other hand, when the students had to practice
speaking in the class, they also showed that they could not use English
spontaneously. They would like to ask the teacher to give extra time to write the
script down before they practiced. Thus, the students tended to memorize the
script. Sometimes some of them forgot what they said in the middle of the
conversation or speech. As a result, the students’ speaking test for the first topic
was not satisfiying. None of the students got scores more than the minimum score,
75.
In order to solve the problems that were faced by the X Kimia Industri
students in SMK Negeri 2 Depok, the researcher planned to conduct a classroom
action research. Borg, Gall and Gall (2007, p. 599) mention that the purpose of
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
4
classroom action research is to solve a problem or achieve a goal in current
practice. In this research, the researcher has a purpose to solve the problem faced
among the X Kimia Industri students in SMK Negeri 2 Depok. The problem was
that the students in X Kimia Industri had difficulties to acquire speaking skills,
especially in having transactional and interpersonal conversation. From the
observation in that school, the researcher realized that those problems came
because the students did not have enough time to practice. The time allocation for
English lesson in 2013 Curriculum is only one meeting each week, in which one
meeting consists of 90 minutes. It is really not enough for them because they also
have to learn other skills. Thus, the teacher has to be creative to make the meeting
as meaningful, effective and efficient as possible for the students to study English.
One of the solutions in language teaching is using media. Media offer
effective, efficient and meaningful teaching and learning in the class. According
to Gerlach, Donal and Melnick (1973, pp. 241-242), media have four general
functions. The first function is media can help to simplify the teaching process.
The second one is media can be the machines that allow the teacher to practice the
principle of object teaching and illustrations. The third function is media help the
students to reduce the use of their mother tongue. Then, the last one is media can
be the instruments of motivation to stimulate the teaching and learning process.
There are many kinds of media that can be used to help the students to
increase their speaking ability. Cue card is one of the teaching media. Cue card
can help the teacher to improve the students’ speaking skill through fun and
interesting ways. According to Briggs (1977, p. xv), a cue is an indirect prompt
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
5
given to help a learner complete a recitation or solve a problem. It can also be
defined as an indirect form of “guidance” stopping short of supplying the missing
word or solution. In addition, Mora (1994, p. 36) states that physically a cue card
is 12 cm x 7 cm in size which contain legible text and pictures. The text and
pictures on the cue card can guide the students to produce utterances in their
conversation. Those text and pictures will be the prompt and supply the idea to
make the students to keep talking without writing the whole dialogue.
There are several studies about cue cards that have relation with speaking
skill. The first study was a journal study written by Mora in 1994. The journal
showed how cue cards could be used to give students practice speaking and
writing English in daily situation. The second study was an undergraduate thesis
written by Habsari in 2012. It was classroom action research which was used to
know the effectiveness of the cue cards to teach speaking fluency in senior high
school. The participants were the students of grade XI in senior high school. The
third study was also an undergraduate thesis written by Kusumastuti in 2012. It
was a study about students’ perception on the use of cue cards in the speaking
activity of the vocational students grade XI. Although there have been several
studies about cue cards, this research is different from the previous studies. This
research is classroom action research dealing with how the cue cards improve the
students’ speaking skill in X Kimia Industri in SMK Negeri 2 Depok.
B. Research Problem
To solve the problems that have been shown in the research background,
there is a research question that will be answered. The research question is:
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
6
How do the cue cards help X Kimia Industri (X KI) students in SMK Negeri
2 Depok to improve their speaking skill?
C. Problem Limitation
In this research, the researcher would like to use cue cards in order to help
X Kimia Industri students in SMK Negeri 2 Depok to increase their speaking skill.
This research is categorized into classroom action research because the purpose of
classroom action research, which is to overcome the problems appearing in the
classroom through some stages, is suitable with the purpose why the researcher
conducted this research. However, in this research, there are some limitations in
order to create deeper and more meaningful result.
The first limitation is on the participants of this research. The participants
of the research are the students in grade X Kimia Industri in SMK Negeri 2 Depok
academic year 2014/2015. Through the observation, the students showed that they
have problems in acquiring the English skills. However, they still kept their
enthusiasm to study English. The students realized that they needed help to
improve their English skills.
The second limitation is on the language skill that will be the focus of the
research. The researcher does not explore all of the skills. From the four English
skills, the researcher decides to focus on speaking skills. It is because most of the
X KI students consider that speaking is the most difficult and important skill to be
mastered. The students realize that acquiring speaking skill is really demanded in
this modern and globalization era.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
7
The third limitation in this research is on the media that will be used to
solve the problems faced by X Kimia Industri students in SMK Negeri 2 Depok.
The media that will be used to improve the student’s speaking skill are cue cards.
The reason why researcher chooses cue card as the media is because of its
effectiveness and efficiency. The researcher expected that cue cards can create fun
learning and motivate the students to speak English fluently and naturally.
The fourth limitation is on the speaking material or topic that can be
explored using cue cards. The speaking material will be elaborated from the
standard competency in the 2013 Curriculum. The researcher will focus on the
transactional and interpersonal function which will be taught in the first semester
in grade X. The topics of the function in this research are Expression of Asking
and Responding to Request, Expression of Giving and Responding to
Compliments, and Expression of Plans and Intentions.
D. Research Objective
The objective of this research is to overcome the problems related the
speaking skill among X Kimia Industri students in SMK Negeri 2 Depok. By
implementing cue cards, the students are expected to improve their speaking
ability. Therefore, the students are able to communicate in English more fluently,
accurately and confidently, especially in the transactional and interactional
function for daily life communication.
E. Research Benefits
There are several benefits which can be obtained from this research. The
researcher expected that this research can give benefits to the students, the English
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
8
teachers in vocational school, the students of English Language Education Study
Program (ELESP) and future researchers. Therefore, those benefits can be
clarified as follows.
1. To the Students of X Kimia Industri SMK Negeri 2 Depok Sleman
Participating in the class in which the cue cards are implemented, the
students will be able to improve their speaking skill. Cue cards are expected to
help the students to speak English fluently. Combining the cue cards with the
appropriate teaching and learning methods and activities, the students can learn
speaking effectively and efficiently with more fun and meaningful ways.
Therefore, they can be vocational graduates who master the spoken language well
in order to communicate with other people actively.
2. To the English Teachers in Vocational School
This research will give the English teachers in vocational school an
alternative solution to solve the problems in teaching speaking. This research
helps the teachers to explore effective and efficient teaching media that can be
used to increase the students’ motivation to speak English.
3. To the Students of English Language Education Study Program (ELESP)
The researcher hopes that this research gives more information to the
students of ELESP about the effective and efficient teaching media which can be
used to teach speaking. The students can try to implement and explore cue cards
to teach their students when they are having microteaching and teaching practice
program.
4. To Future Researchers
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
9
The researcher hopes that this research can be useful for everyone who
wants to conduct research or study related to the cue cards, speaking skills and
vocational school in the context of English teaching and learning. The researcher
also hopes this research can give future researchers insights to study deeper about
the use of cue cards in order to enrich the development of English teaching media.
F. Definition of Terms
In order to have clear understanding on this study, the researcher includes
the definition of terms used in this research. Moreover, this section defines
keywords or phrases especially used in this research, in attempting to clarify
concept, avoid misinterpretation and misunderstanding. It will help the readers
understand terms used in this research easily. The keywords and also the phrases
will be defined related to the research. Therefore, in this section, it is important to
define the following terms.
1. Cue Cards
Mora (1994) states cue cards are thin cardboards containing legible printed
texts or pictures. The size of the cards is like poker card around 7 cm x 12 cm. In
this research, every card will contain texts and pictures. The texts on the card can
be a single word or phrase. The pictures on the cards are the pictures that related
to the word. Therefore, both the words and the pictures can be the clues of what
the students are going to say. In this research, the content of the cue cards will be
adapted depending on the expressions that will be learned by the students in X
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
10
Kimia Industri of SMK Negeri 2 Depok in the first semester academic year
2014/2015.
2. Speaking Skills
Bailey (2003) states that speaking is the productive aural or oral skill that
consists of producing systematic verbal utterances to convey meaning. Having
good speaking skill means that the person can communicate to the other person
well. He or she can understand what the other says and involves in the
conversation. In this research, acquiring speaking skill is determined by producing
expressions and involving in the meaningful conversation.
3. X Kimia Industri of SMK Negeri 2 Depok
X Kimia Industri of SMK Negeri 2 Depok is one of the classes in SMK
Negeri 2 Depok, Sleman, Yogyakarta. This class usually deals with the chemistry
product and marketing. There are 32 students in this class. The students in X
Kimia Industri of SMK Negeri 2 Depok are the participants of the class in which
the cue cards are implemented. Through the observation and interview, the
students in X Kimia Industri of SMK Negeri 2 Depok showed that they have
difficulties in speaking. They were afraid of speaking in English and not
confident. They tended to use Indonesian or local language rather than English.
Therefore, X Kimia Industri of SMK Negeri 2 Depok is the setting in which cue
cards are implemented
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
11
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
This chapter includes a discussion of the related literature review. It
presents theoretical research which consists of two main parts, namely theoretical
description and theoretical framework. Theoretical description discusses some
theories related to the study which are needed to conduct Classroom Action
Research. This chapter consists of some sections. They are The Nature of
Speaking Skills, Teaching Speaking, The Use of Cue Cards as the Teaching
Media, and English for Vocational School in Curriculum 2013.
The theories discussed will be used as the bases to establish the theoretical
framework of this research. Theoretical framework discuses major relevant
theories which help the researcher implement the cue cards to improve the
students’ speaking ability of X Kimia Industri in SMK Negeri 2 Depok.
A. Theoretical Description
This part gives the appropriate theories implemented in this research. It is
aimed to give the foundation from related literature review and written sources to
conduct this study. There are four sections that are discussed in this part. The first
section is The Nature of Speaking Skill, which leads the researcher to do this
research. The second section is Teaching Speaking Skill. The third section is The
Use of Cue Card as the Teaching Media and the fourth one is about English for
Vocational School in the 2013 Curriculum.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
12
1. The Nature of Speaking
This part presents some theories related to speaking skill. The theories
discussed in this part are the definition of speaking, characteristics of speaking,
types of speaking and the discussion of speaking accuracy and fluency. Further
discussion about the theories related to the speaking skill will be described as
follows.
a. The Definition of Speaking
Bailey (2003) as cited by Nunan (2003, p. 48) states that speaking is the
productive spoken skill consisting utterances to give meaning. Spoken language is
different from written language. Brown and Yule (1983) state that “the nature of
spoken language is distinguishing between spoken and written languages” (as
cited in Nunan, 1999, p. 226). Spoken language consists of short, often
fragmentary utterances, in range of pronunciation. Nunan (1999) states that
“communicative competence includes not only linguistic competence, but also a
range of other linguistics and conversational skills that enable the speaker to know
how to say what to whom, and when” (p. 226). It means that the speakers need to
know not only what they are going to say but also the setting when they speak and
the person to whom they speak. Thus, speaking is an ability to produce the
language orally in order to communicate with others. Speaking is important to be
accomplished by people because it is the basic skill in communication. In
speaking, a speaker needs to be able to deliver what he or she intends to speak to
others by using the most appropriate form of language.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
13
b. The Characteristics of Speaking
Speaking is an ability to produce the language orally in order to
communicate with others. According to Nunan (1999, p. 49), there are four
characteristics of being communicative. The first characteristic is knowledge of
grammar and vocabulary of the language. The second characteristic is the rules of
speaking which consist of the knowledge to talk about different topics to different
people in different situations. The third characteristic is the knowledge of how to
use and respond to different functions of language like requests, apologies, thanks
and invitation. The fourth characteristic is the knowledge of how to use the
language appropriately.
Bailey (2003) as is cited by Nunan (2003, p. 48) presents other
characteristics of spoken language which are stated by Van Lier. Van Lier (1995,
p. 88) states that spoken language is an auditory skill. As an auditory skill, spoken
language has the characteristic of a temporary. Spoken language needs immediate
reception and feedback. The rhythm, stress and intonation are included in spoken
language and it needs immediate feedback. In spoken language, the speakers have
limitation of planning on what they are going to say and limitation of editing on
what they have been said.
c. Types of Speaking
Brown and Yule as cited in Nunan (1999, p. 27) draw a useful distinction
between two basic language functions. These are the transactional function, which
is primarily concerned with the transfer of information, and the interactional
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
14
function, in which the primary purpose of speech is the maintenance of social
relationships.
Scoot Thornbury (2005) as cited in Harmer (2007, p. 343) suggests that
there are various dimensions of different speaking events to differentiate speaking
genres. Based on the purpose of speaking, speaking can be categorized into two
types. They are transactional function and interpersonal function. Harmer (2007)
explains “transactional funtion has its main purpose in conveying information and
facilitating the exchange of goods and services, whereas the interpersonal
functional is all about maintaining and sustaining good relations between people”
(p. 343).
Harmer (2007) also shows another categorization of speaking. They are
interactive and non-interactive. Interactive speaking is the conversation done by
two or more people in which each person speaks. Each person will give and
receive the information. The example of interactive speaking is the conversation
that takes place between the seller and the customer in the market. While non-
interactive speaking is the conversation that involves two or more people but there
is only one person who is the most dominant. The example of non-interactive
speaking is leaving message on the phone.
The last categorization that is shown by Harmer (2007, p. 343) is planned
and unplanned speaking. Planned speaking is the situation when the speaker can
prepare what he or she is going to speak. The example of planned speaking is a
lecture or wedding speech. Unplanned speaking is the situation when the speaker
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
15
directly and spontaneously gives respond or reaction to the other speakers. The
example of unplanned speaking is bumping into someone on the street.
Brown (2004, pp. 141-142) proposed five basic types of speaking. The first
type is imitative speaking. In this type of speaking, the speakers are supposed to
have the ability to simply parrot back (imitate) a word or phrase or possibly a
sentence. For instance, the speaker parrot back short stretch of language retained
by a native speaker or recording. The second type of speaking is intensive
speaking. It deals with the production of short stretches of oral language designed
to demostrate in a narrow band of grammartical, phrasal, lexical, or phonological
relationships such as prosodic elements-intonation, stress, rhythm, and juncture.
The examples of intensive speaking are sentence and dialogue completion,
directed response task and the like. Responsive speaking, which is the third type
of speaking, requires the speakers to be able to give the correct and expected
answer of certain question verbally. This speaking can be used for interaction and
test comprehension by in the limited level of very short conversations, standard
greetings and small talk, simple requests and comments, and the like. The four
type of speaking is interactive speaking which is to maintain the social
relationships. The fifth type of speaking is extensive speaking. It requires the
speakers to produce a monologue, oral presentations, or story-telling.
d. Speaking Accuracy and Fluency
Bailey (2003) as cited in Nunan (2003, p. 55) suggests that there are two
important aspects that should be paid attention on speaking. They are speaking
fluency and speaking accuracy. Bailey (2003) states that speaking fluency “… is
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
16
the extent to which speakers use the language quickly and confidently, with few
hesitations or unnatural pauses, false starts, word searches, etc…” (as cited in
Nunan, 2003, p. 56). Moreover, speaking fluency deals with the ability to respond
to what other people say to them directly. On the other hand, speaking accuracy is
the extent to which students’ speech matches what people actually say. Speaking
accuracy also deals with the ability to use grammar, vocabulary, and
pronunciation accurately. From those aspects above, each speaker is expected to
use the language based on its function to the right person in the right situation.
2. Teaching Speaking
This part presents some theories related to teaching speaking. The theories
discussed in this part are The Nature of Teaching Speaking, The Aims of
Teaching Speaking, The Problems of Teaching Speaking and The Principles of
Teaching Speaking. Further discussion about every part will be presented as
follows.
a. The Nature of Teaching Speaking
Harmer (2007) states that “students are expected to be able speak in a
range of different genres and situations, and they will have to be able to use a
range of conversational and conversational repair strategies. They will need to be
able to survive in typical functional exchanges” (p. 343). It means when the
students learn speaking, the students are expected to be able to speak to anyone
and anytime.
Harmer (2007) also states three main reasons for teaching speaking to the
students in the classroom. He states that:
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
17
Firstly, speaking activities provide rehearsal opportunities-chances to
practice real-life speaking in the safety of the classroom. Secondly,
speaking tasks in which students try to use any or all of the language they
knowprovide feedback for both the teacher and the students. And finally
the more students have opportunities to active the various elements of the
language they have stored in the brain, the more automatic their use of
these element becomes (p. 127).
From the explanation above, speaking practices done by the students in the
class give opportunities for them to speak English in real-life. Having practice
everyday, the students can improve their speaking skill. Having reflection is also
needed because it helps the students recognize their problems in speaking. Thus,
the students will be accustomed to using the language sand speak spontaneously.
b. The Aims of Teaching Speaking
Brown (2007) states that “the benchmark successful teaching speaking is
there is demonstration of an ability to accomplish pragmatic goals through
interactive discourse with their other speakers of the language” (p. 322). It means
that teaching speaking will be considered successful if the learners in speaking
class can show their ability to speak and reveal their idea.
Nunan (2003, p. 56) notes that the goals and the techniques for teaching
speaking are extremely diverse, depending on the students, teachers, overall
contexts of techniques in the interactive classroom. The teacher can deal with both
interpersonal (interactional) and transactional dialogue. In brief, the aim of
teaching speaking is to help the students to use the language in oral
communication.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
18
c. The Problems in Teaching Speaking
Many problems in the teaching and learning English are faced by the
teacher and students. Before discussing the problem in teaching speaking, the
researcher will show the reason why speaking looks difficult. Brown (2003) states
eight reasons of what makes speaking difficult. They are “clustering, redundancy,
reduced forms, performance variables, colloquial language, rate of delivery,
stress-rhythm-intonation, and interaction” (pp. 270-271).
On the other hand, Gebhard (1996, p. 186) states three main problems
usually faced by the students and teachers in the teaching and learning speaking.
They are the students’ unwillingness to speak, the teachers’ errors on giving
feedback and the perception that native speaker can teach speaking better.
1) The Students’ Unwillingness to Speak
There is the fact that the students in any classes, beginners or even some
students who are in advanced level do not have willingness to speak. There are
two reasons why the students do not want to speak. The first reason is the students
are shy, anxious and not confident. Most of them are afraid of making mistakes.
The possibility to improve their confidence is by giving them trust. The students
must have feeling that the teacher is on their side. In this case, the teacher can start
using some warm-up activities. The second reason is the students only have
limited time to practice speaking English. They are not accustomed to speaking
English. Therefore, students must have many opportunities to practice speaking in
the class to solve this problem.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
19
2) The Teachers’ Errors on Giving Feedback
Feedback from teacher is very important for students to improve their
speaking ability. However, the fact shown by Gebhard (1996) is not all the
teachers agree with that statement. Many teachers also believe that the students
learn the grammar of a language by their own. There are many types of feedback
that can be given to the students. Gebhard (1996) describes two types of feedback.
The first feedback is direct feedback, which is given directly to the students. In
giving this feedback, the teacher will interrupt the students’ speech and correct the
oral errors. The second feedback is delay feedback, which is given later after the
student finish their speaking.
The teacher should know which feedback is the best for the students.
Gebhard (1996) emphasizes that the most effective feedback is the most needed
by the students. Teacher has to give the feedback in the careful and meaningful
ways in order to make the students pay attention to the feedback given to them
and help them not to do the same mistakes.
3) The Perception that Native Speaker Teaches Speaking Better
Many people consider that all native speakers can teach speaking in
English. However, people should be careful. Gebhard (1996) notices that native
speakers can be the standard on how to use the language naturally although
sometimes they are not qualified as teachers. Not all native speakers are
guaranteed to have good ability in teaching. They need to improve the ability on
the variety of skills in classroom management.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
20
d. The Principles of Teaching Speaking
There are many principles in teaching speaking. Those will be the
foundation for the teacher to design the classroom techniques and activities.
Bailey (2003) as cited in Nunan (2003, pp. 54-56) states five principles of
teaching speaking. They are:
1) Be aware of the differences between second language and foreign language
learning contexts
Bailey (2003) notes that the challenge of teaching speaking in foreign
language learning context is that the students will not have many opportunities to
use the target language outside the classroom. It is because the target language is
not the language used to communicate in their community. Since English is a
foreign language in Indonesia, the students here also do not have many
opportunities to use English to communicate. One of the opportunities in which
they can speak in English is when they practice it in class. Therefore, teachers
must be able to design the teaching and learning activities that enable the students
to practice the language maximally.
2) Give students practice in fluency and accuracy
Students must be given the opportunities to use the language in order to
develop their accuracy and fluency in learning the language. When the students
speak in the target language accurately, it means that their speech in the target
language matches the other speakers’ speech. Students speak in the target
language fluently means that they speak in the target language quickly,
confidently, with few hesitation or unnatural pauses, false starts and word
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
21
searches. In order to help the students to be fluent in speaking, teachers should
give the students opportunities to speak. Teachers must provide various activities
that can enable the students to use the language and practice it. Teacher should be
able to allocate the time effectively. Moreover, if the only opportunity the students
have to speak in English is just in the class during the English lesson. Teacher
must give understanding that making mistakes is a natural part of learning a new
language. Feedback that is given to the students should be in the correct way.
Bailey (2003) states students cannot develop fluency if the teacher keeps
interrupting the students’ speech to correct the students’ oral errors.
3) Provide opportunities for students to talk by using group work or pair work,
and limiting teacher talk
In teaching speaking, teachers should minimize their domination to talk in
the class. In other words, teachers have to give opportunities to the students to
speak a lot. Bailey (2003) suggests that “pair work and group work activities can
be used to increase the amount of time that learners get to speak in the target
language during lessons” (p. 55). It means that the pair work and group work are
very effective to make the students speak when they learn the language in class.
Students usually feel more comfortable, relaxed and free to speak with their
friends in groups rather than in whole class. Therefore, teachers must provide
many activities that enable the students to speak and practice the language with
their friends.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
22
4) Plan speaking tasks that involve negotiation for meaning
The negotiation for meaning is the ability to understand and to be
understood by the other speakers in the communication of the target language.
Bailey (2003, p. 55) adds that “by asking for clarification, repetition, or
explanation during conversations, learners get the people they are speaking with
to address them with language at a level they can learn and understand. They are
natural in the speaking context. It is why memorizing is not the appropriate way to
learn speaking. It makes the way of speaking look unnatural. The students need to
learn how to speak naturally by involving the use of the negotiating for meaning.
5) Design classroom activities that involve guidance and practice in both
transactional and interactional speaking
Bailey (2003) mentions that the classroom activities for teaching speaking
must cover transactional and interactional speaking activities, because those are
the main purposes of speaking activities. Bailey (2003) also adds that “speaking
activities inside the classroom need to embody both interactional and transactional
purposes. Since language learners will have to speak the target language in both
transactional and interactional setting” (p. 56). The teachers must create the
teaching and learning activities that enable the students to use the language for
both transactional and interactional purposes. To develop speaking techniques,
Nunan (2003) states seven principles. They are:
a) Techniques that are used should cover the spectrum of learner needs, from
language based focus on accuracy to message-based focus on interaction,
meaning, and fluency;
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
23
b) Provide intrinsically motivating techniques;
c) Encourage the use of authentic language in meaningful contexts;
d) Provide appropriate feedback and correction;
e) Capitalize on the natural link between speaking and listening;
f) Give students opportunities to initiate oral communication;
g) Encourage the development of speaking strategies. (Nunan, 2003, pp. 275-
276)
Bailey (2003) as cited by Nunan (2003, pp. 56-58) notes five classroom
technique and tasks in teaching speaking. Those five techniques and tasks could
be used to enrich the speaking activities in this class. Therefore, the students have
more opportunities to speak. Those techniques and tasks will be presented as
follows.
a) Information gap
This speaking activity involves the students to exchange the information that
they have in the target language.
b) Jigsaw activity
Bailey says it is “a bidirectional or multidirectional information gap” (p.56).
This speaking activity involves the students to have negotiation for meaning.
c) Role-plays
In this technique, the students are given particular roles to speak in the target
language. It can be done in pairs or in groups.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
24
d) Simulations
This technique is the elaboration of role-plays. In a simulation, there will be
properties to provide a real environment and create the nuances.
e) Contact assignments
This technique involves the students to have an activity out of the classroom
in order to talk to people in the target language. (Nunan, 2003, pp. 56-58)
3. The Use of Cue Cards as Teaching Media
This part presents some theories related to cue cards. The theories
discussed in this part are the nature of cue cards, the advantages of using cue cards
as the teaching media and speaking activities using cue cards. Further discussion
about every part will be shown below.
a. The Nature of Cue Cards
Harmer (2007) defines cue as another word for “prompt” (p. 180). In one
sense it means an action or behavior that starts a chain of events. It also means the
significant elements in a situation. While Briggs (1977, p. xv) defines a cue is an
indirect prompt given to help a learner complete a recitation or solve a problem. It
can also be defined as an indirect form of “guidance” stopping short of supplying
the missing word or solution. In short, cue is the prompt that is used to guide the
speaker to speak fluently and give the solution when the speaker misses the words
and does not have any idea.
Harmer (2007, p. 181) defines cue card is one of the forms of flashcards.
Cue card is defined as small card which can be used in pair or group work. Apart
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
25
from flash cards with pictures on them, cards of all shapes and sizes are good
choices. Harmer (2007, p. 179) also adds that cards should be appropriate not only
for the purpose in hand by but for the classes they are being used for. It should be
visible so it can be used more than once or reusable.
Teacher can make wall pictures, flashcards and cue cards in a number of
ways. Teacher can take pictures from magazines and stick them on card. It is
possible to find pictures of almost anything on the Internet and print them off.
Physically, Mora (1994, p. 36) states that cue cards are thin cardboards contained
legible printed texts or pictures. The size of the cards is like poker card around 7
cm x 12 cm. Every card usually consists of texts and pictures. The pictures on the
cue cards could be very simple and designed to elicit a word or a phrase.
b. The Advantages of Using Cue Cards as The Teaching Media
Zarefsky (1996, p. 290) states note cards, which go under the name of cue
cards in this study, are printed texts or pictures on thin card boards. It contains
speaking outlines which are usually used by the speaker to deliver the speech.
Note cards are very effective for speaking. “They are practical ways to use in a
speech because they are compact, studier, and less distracting” (Zarefsky, 1996, p.
290). Like in a speech, cue cards were very practical to use in some speaking
activities. It has simple forms that will not disturb the speakers in doing the
speaking activities. According to Sayer (2005), using cue cards in some speaking
techniques like role-plays and diagram is a good combination of techniques to
help the students practice speaking. Cue cards can help the students to produce
utterances in their conversation without writing the whole dialogue. In line with
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
26
Zarefsky and Sayer, Littlewood (1981, p. 50) agrees that cue cards can be used in
teaching speaking. Cue cards can help the students to create meaningful
interaction by giving questions and responses in the spontaneous way. Littlewood
(1981) states that:
This gives the interaction some of the uncertainty and spontaneity involved
in “real” communication because each learner must listen to his partner
before formulating a definite response. On the other hand, the cues enable
them to predict a large proportion of what the others will say, and of
course, to prepare the general gist of their own response” (p. 51).
Spontaneity requires a speaker to listen to what another speaker says
before giving responses directly. Spontaneity in speaking is related to the fluency.
The relation is when the speaker can give direct responses; they can speak
quickly, confidently and without any hesitation or unnecessary pauses.
Littlewood (1981, p. 51) states that cue cards can be used to study fluency in
speaking because it supplies the idea for the speaker to speak spontaneously.
In addition, Boyd (2007) states cue cards are tools “used to help the patient
restructure thought patterns” (p. 421). Cue cards allow the speaker to predict what
other speakers say so that he or she can prepare his or her own responses. The
pictures on the cue cards help the speaker to imagine what their situations are.
Harmer (2007, p. 179) notes a picture can also be used for creative language use.
It can invent the conversation taking place between two people in a picture.
c. Speaking Activities Using Cue Cards
Cue cards are effective and efficient media that can be used to improve the
students’ speaking ability. Sayer (2005) notices that using cue cards in some
speaking techniques like role-plays and diagram is a good combination of
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
27
techniques to help the students practice speaking. Cue cards can be applied in
some classroom activities. Littlewood (1981) notices “cue cards are eligible to be
used in matching and ordering games and card games” (p. 55). The games, which
use cue cards, can involve a pair of two students or groups. In line with
Littlewood (1981), Harmer (2007, pp. 178-179) states that cue cards can be used
in a multiplicity of ways, for examples, for drilling, communication games,
prediction, understanding, ornamentation and discussion.
Pictures on the cue cards give important role in every speaking activity.
Harmer (2007, p. 179) notices pictures help the students to be more creative in
using the language because it helps the students to imagine what kind of situation
they are. The conversation taking place between two people or in one particular
role-play activity can be invented by putting pictures on the cue cards.
Beside role play, cue cards also can be used in communication drills.
Communication drills are activities which provide the students to practice in
repetition and variation of language segments. Rivers (1983) notices “….drill
may be given the appearance of a game, or of elementary communication, by
provoking the students into asking the teacher a series of questions in response to
cues …” (p. 44). From that statement, it can be concluded that communication
drills can be given in the form of games. Communication drills can be applied
using cue cards. Rivers (1983, p. 45) states that drilling done in the innovative
way can make the students more interested in using the language.
Paulston (1970) as cited in Rivers (1983, p. 45) divides communication
drills into three types. They are mechanical drills, meaningful drills, and
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
28
communicative drills. In mechanical drills, the students do not need to understand
the meaning of the words or the sentences because there is a pattern to control the
responses. The purpose of mechanical drills is the students can give responses
completely in good sentence construction, proper pronunciation and intonation.
An example of a mechanical drill would be presented as follows.
Pattern : I’m holding a book.
Cue : Magazine
Response : I’m holding a magazine.
Cue : Banana
Response : I’m holding a banana. (Rivers, 1983, p. 45)
In meaningful drills, the students must have understanding completely in
grammar and meaning although there is still a pattern to control the responses.
The students must understand the meaning of the cue to make a meaningful
conversation. The following conversation is an example of a meaningful drill:
Question : When did you arrive this morning?
Answer : I arrived at nine o’clock.
Question : When will you leave this evening?
Answer : I’ll leave at six o’clock. (Rivers, 1983, p. 45)
In communicative drills, the students must have understood completely in
grammar and semantic but there is not any pattern to control the response. The
students have free choices to answer. However, Paulston (1970) underlines
“..whatever control there is lies in the stimulus…. It still remains a drill rather
than free communication because we are still within the realm of the cue-response
pattern” (as cited in Rivers, 1983, p. 46). An example of mechanical drills is
presented as follows.
Question : What did you have for breakfast?
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
29
Answer : I had toast and coffee for breakfast.
OR
Answer : I slept late night and skipped breakfast so I wouldn’t miss
the bus. (Rivers, 1983, p. 46)
Furthermore, Palmer (1970) as cited by Rivers (1983, p. 46) states
communication practice drills are useful for teaching speaking. Communication
practice drills provide the students find the response not only in linguistically
acceptable but also in personally relevant to themselves and other people. Palmer
(1970) underlines drills should be done carefully to build the students’ characters.
This is the illustration of Palmer’s communication practice drills.
Pattern : I would tell him to shut the door.
Teacher : Karen, if you and Susan came to class at 8 a.m. and it was
winter and the room was dark at 8 a.m., what would you tell
Susan?
Karen : I would tell her to turn on the light.
Teacher : And how about you, Paul, if you were with Mary and you
wanted to read, what would you do?
Paul : I would tell her to turn on the light.
Teacher : You as a boy would tell a girl to do that for you?
Now, if you came alone, and I was in the room, what would
you do?
Paul : I would tell you to turn on the light.
Teacher : Then I would throw you out of the class.
(Rivers, 1983, p. 46)
The illustration above shows that Paul’s response is mechanically correct
but unfortunately he does not know the implication of his response in a certain
setting. In social interaction, it is impolite if young people ask elder people to do
something. Teacher’s teasing in this drill is used to increase the students’ self
awareness on using the language. Rivers (1983, p. 47) notes having training in
such drills can help the students to be able to produce more original responses.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
30
4. English for Vocational School in the 2013 Curriculum
Vocational education is known as a formal secondary education which has
special characteristics among other educational institutions. The special
characteristic of vocational school is organizing an educational program which is
appropriate for various fields of work. According to Calhoen vocational education
is “an organized education program which is directly related to the preparation for
a career requirement other than baccalaureate or advanced degree” (as cited in
Soeharto, 1988, p. 1). Supriadi (2002) states that “vocational education is aimed to
produce productive human, not human who becomes a burden for his or her
family, community and nation” (p. 17). Based on Depdiknas (2003), there are four
aims of vocational school. The first aim is vocational school prepares the students
in the field of work and to develop a professional attitude. The second aim is to
prepare the students in order to be able to choose their carrier, compete and
develop themselves. The third aim is vocational school prepares the middle level
labors for business world and industries at the present time and the future. The last
one is vocational school prepares the graduates in order to be productive, adaptive
and creative citizen.
Related to the objective of vocational education, Bryl Shoemaker and
Thomas Arcy as cited by Soeharto (1988, p. 9) state the vocational education can
be used as the preparation for the students before entering the job field. In short, it
can be concluded that vocational education is not only an education for the
students to have continuity education as an aspect of general education, but also as
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
31
an organized education which prepares the students to be productive people as
their preparation to find jobs.
Since English is as the international means of communication, it also
becomes compulsory subject in vocational school. English plays an important role
in the student’s current and future links. The students in the vocational school are
expected to take parts in the global era community with adequate competence in
English. Furthermore, the vocational school graduates can get better job and lives
by working for business sector in foreign countries.
The 2013 Curriculum is the latest curriculum for national education in
Indonesia. According to Materi Pelatihan Guru Implementasi Kurikulum 2013
which is written by Kemendikbud (2014), the 2013 Curriculum is the continuation
of Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi (KBK) 2004 and Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan
Pendidikan (KTSP) 2006. The purpose of changing the curriculum is to improve
morality and tolerance among Indonesian youth. Therefore, the implementation of
the 2013 Curriculum emphasizes how important the aspect of attitude, skill, and
knowledge for building the students’ soft skill and hard skill.
However, in the 2013 Curriculum puts attitude on the higher priority than
skill and knowledge. Attitude is related to how an individual view issues and other
people. Skill is related to how to do something while knowledge is related to how
to understand the information and ideas. Based on Krathwohl’s taxonomy,
“attitude can be measured through accepting, responding, organizing or
internalizing, valuing and characterizing or actualizing” (as cited in Kemendikbud,
2014, p. 14). Skill is measured using Dyers’ taxonomy, which consists of
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
32
observing, questioning, experimenting, associating, and communicating. Then,
using Bloom’s taxonomy which is revised by Anderson, Kemendikbud (2014, p.
13) suggests knowledge can be measured through knowing or remembering,
understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating and creating.
The approach used in the 2013 Curriculum is Scientific Approach. Scientific
Approach encourages the students to do observing, questioning, experimenting,
associating and networking. Permendikbud no. 81 A tahun 2013 states that
learning process in the 2013 Curriculum must consists of observing, questioning,
experimenting, associating and networking steps. In the observing step, the
students find the fact and the relation between object which is shown and the
learning material. In the questioning step, the students ask what they do not know
about the material. In the experimenting step, the students explore more about the
material by reading or discussion. In the associating step, the students conclude
the results of their experiment logically. The last step is networking or
communicating which means that the students apply what they have learned in the
daily communication.
To support those steps, there are two teaching models in the 2013
Curriculum. They are Project-Based Learning and Discovery Learning. Project-
Based Learning involves the students working in the permanent groups to explore
learning issues in the framework of a realistic problem. Discovery Learning which
is proposed by Bruner involves the students to draw their past experience and
existing knowledge to discover facts and relationships and new truths to be
learned. English in the 2013 Curriculum becomes compulsory subject in
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
33
vocational school. However, the time allocation for English lesson is only two
contact hours each week in which one contact hour consists of 45 minutes.
B. Theoretical Framework
This research employs several theories in order to solve the problem. The
research problem is to find out how cue cards improve speaking skill of the
students in X Kimia Industri of SMK Negeri 2 Depok. This section summarizes the
relationship between the problem that will be solved and the related theories.
The theories used in this research are presented in the sections of The
Nature of Speaking, Teaching Speaking Skill, The Use of Cue Cards as The
Teaching Media and English for Vocational School in the 2013 Curriculum. In the
first section, The Nature of Speaking, there is a theory about the definition of
speaking which is used by the researcher as the foundation to know what actually
speaking is. The knowledge of the characteristics of speaking and types of
speaking help the researcher understand the characteristics of speaking and the
types of speaking. Those theories also help the researcher to decide what kind of
speaking that is taught to the students. Since this research discusses the students’
speaking skill, the theories of speaking fluency and accuracy are important as the
foundation to know the meaning and characteristics of fluency and accuracy.
Fluency and accuracy are aspects which are measured in speaking.
The theories, which are presented in Teaching Speaking Skill section, are
important for the foundation to teach speaking skill. Theory of the nature of
teaching speaking is used to know the reason why speaking is taught to the
students. The knowledge of the aims of teaching speaking is also used to know
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
34
the goals of teaching speaking so that the teaching practice will not deviate from
the goals. To know the problems which are faced by the students in X Kimia
Industri of SMK Negeri Depok, the researcher did the observation. The knowledge
of problems in teaching speaking is used to support the results of analyzing the
students’ problems. The last theory in Teaching Speaking Skill, namely the
principles of teaching speaking, is used by the researcher as the guidance to teach
speaking. Knowing the principles of teaching speaking, the researcher can
conduct the teaching and learning successfully. Therefore, the goal of this
research, which is to help the students improve their speaking skill, can be
achieved.
The knowledge of the use of cue cards as the teaching media is important in
this research since cue cards are the teaching aids used to help the students
improve their speaking skill. The knowledge of the advantages of using cue cards
will be the foundation to understand what cue cards are and how cue cards can be
used effectively in learning speaking. Understanding those theories, the researcher
choose the cue cards which can be used effectively in teaching and learning
activities. Therefore, the knowledge of the advantages of cue cards is supported
by the knowledge of speaking activities using cue cards. The theory about
communication drill (Rivers, 1983, pp. 44-48) is the foundation to implement the
cue cards in the speaking activities in order to create the meaningful and effective
learning process.
The knowledge in the section English of Vocational School in the 2013
Curriculum is also important in this research since this research will be conducted
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
35
in the vocational school, which has special aims of education. The theory helps
the researcher to recognize the needs and the characteristics of vocational
students. While the knowledge about English in the 2013 Curriculum is used for
the guidance to make lesson plan and the assessment of the students’
performances, so that the goal of teaching speaking English based on the 2013
Curriculum can be reached.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
36
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
In this chapter, the researcher will provide the methodology applied in
conducting the research. The explanation of the detailed methodology in this
research will be elaborated under several sections, namely Research Method,
Research Setting, Research Participants, Instruments and Data Gathering
Technique, Data Analysis Technique, and Research Procedure.
A. Research Method
This research was conducted by using classroom action research in order to
find out how the cue cards improve speaking skills of X Kimia Industri students in
SMK Negeri 2 Depok. Fraenkel and Wallen (2009) define action research as “a
research conducted by one or more individuals or groups for the purposes of
solving a problem or obtaining information in order to inform local practice” (p.
589). In line with Fraenkel and Wallen, Hopkins (1993, p. 1) states this research is
done by the teachers to evaluate their own or their colleague’s teaching or to
implement a certain teaching technique to find out the solutions to the current
problems in the class. In addition, Borg (1983, p. 597) mentions action research in
education is a form of applied research whose primary purpose is to increase the
quality, impact, and justice of education professionals’ practice. Borg also
explains the research purpose of classroom action research is to solve a problem
or achieve a goal in current practice. The research done by the researcher in SMK
Negeri 2 Depok was categorized as classroom action research because the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
37
implementation of cue cards was one of teaching techniques which was used to
solve the problem faced by the students in speaking English.
Kurt Lewin (1953) as cited in Hopkins (1993) describes classroom action
research as “a spiraling cyclical activities that consisted in analysis, fact finding,
conceptualization, planning execution and more fact-finding or evaluation” (p.
45). In further, Lewin’s idea is developed by Stephen Kemmis (1988), whose are
steps are generally understood as “an action-reflection cycle of planning, acting,
observing, and reflecting” (as cited Hopkins, 1993, p.48). The continuation of the
cycles shows that there is a change in thinking and a change in action. The
following figure is the summary of Stephen Kemmis’ approach to classroom
action research shown by Hopkins (1993, p. 48).
Figure 3.1 The Stephen Kemmis’s Approach to Classroom Action Research
(Hopkins, 1993, p. 48)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
38
The classroom action research done in SMK Negeri 2 Depok was conducted
based on the framework proposed by Stephen Kemmis. There were three cycles,
in which there were four stages in every cycle. In the planning stages, the
researcher analyzed the problems faced by the teacher and students in teaching
and learning process. The data were gathered from the observation and interview.
Based on the observation and interview, the students had difficulties to improve
their speaking skill. The students were not accustomed to speaking in English.
They were not confident and felt afraid of making mistakes. They had limited
vocabulary and did not have enough time to practice speaking. To solve the
problem, the researcher offered a solution by using cue cards as the teaching
media. In this step, the researcher designed cue cards based on the topic that
would be learned by the students in X Kimia Industri of SMK Negeri 2 Depok.
The researcher also designed the lesson plans as the guidelines to implement cue
cards in the classroom.
The second stage in Kemmis’ framework is acting. The acting stage
included the implementation of cue cards as the solutions to the problem faced by
the students in X Kimia Industri of SMK Negeri 2 Depok. Cue cards would be
combined with some teaching techniques to attract the students to have
meaningful speaking activities. The third stage is observing. The observing stage
cannot be separated from the acting stage. The acting and observing stages in this
research were carried out simultaneously. The observing step included the data
gathering. The researcher observed every single event which happened in the class
by using observation checklists and field notes. To support data gathered from
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
39
observation checklist and field notes, the researcher also distributed the
questionnaire and conducted the interview a few hours after finishing the acting
stage.
The last stage in this classroom action research was reflecting. The
reflection was dealing with the results of the implementation of cue cards in the
class. The results of the reflection in this stage would be the foundation for the
researcher to conclude whether the cue cards could really help the students
improve their speaking skill or not. Then, the researcher concluded whether the
researcher needed to do the next cycle or ended the cycle. If the researcher needed
to do the next cycle, the result of reflection helped the researcher decide what
should be improved in the next cycle.
B. Research Setting
This research was conducted from August 29th
, 2014 until September 26th
,
2014 in X Kimia Industri (KI) class of SMK Negeri 2 Depok Sleman Yogyakarta
in the first semester of the 2014/2015 academic year. This research was conducted
in five meetings in which one meeting lasted for ninety minutes.
C. Research Participants
The participants of the research were the students in X Kimia Industri of
SMK Negeri 2 Depok in the 2014/2015 academic year. The numbers of the
students were 32 students. All of them would participate in the research. Based on
the observation and interview done by the researcher in July-August 2014, the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
40
students in this class had difficulties in speaking English. They did not know what
they had to say in a daily conversation.
D. Instruments and Data Gathering Technique
In this research, the researcher used a number of instruments to gather the
data. The instruments would be divided into two types. They were the research
instruments used before the implementation and the research instruments used
during the implementation.
1. The Research Instruments Used before the Implementation
There were some instruments which were used before the implementation of
cue cards in the teaching and learning activities in the classroom. The instruments
used before the implementation consisted of field notes, semi-structured focus
group interview and speaking test. Each instrument used before the
implementation of cue cards is described as follows.
a. Field Notes
According to Kemmis and McTaggart (1982), field notes are “the methods
of reporting observations of and reflections about classroom problems and the
teacher’s own reaction to them” (p. 197). Before the implementation of cue cards,
the researcher observed the speaking ability of the students in X Kimia Industri
SMK Negeri 2 Depok by using field notes. Field notes helped the researcher to
make self-reflection on the problems found in the classroom.
b. Semi-structured Focus Group Interview
Before the implementation of cue cards, the researcher conducted focus
group interview. Focus group interview was used to confirm a clear illustration of
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
41
the students’ real problem in speaking. Mills (2011) explains focus group is “a
particularly useful technique when the interaction among individuals will lead to a
shared understanding of the questions being posed by the researcher” (p. 79).
There were two focus groups in which there were 5-6 students in one focus group.
The researcher used semi structured questions to conduct focus group interview.
During the interview, the students shared their understanding of the questions one
by one. The researcher made the atmosphere as warm as possible in order to make
the students feel comfortable to share their understanding.
c. Speaking Test
Speaking test is used to measure the students’ speaking ability. Brown
(2004, p. 114) defines performance test, in which in this research goes under the
name of speaking test, measures an individual’s performance on a particular task.
Before the implementation of cue cards, the speaking score were taken when the
students performed a role play for the first topic in the first semester academic
year 2014/2015.
To define the speaking score, the researcher used a rubric. According to
Best and Khan (1981, p. 89), a rubric is used to evaluate certain performance
based on the criteria an observer has already kept in mind. Based on the theory of
assessing speaking which is proposed by Brown (2004, p. 114), Hughes (1989, p.
116) and theory of assessing in the 2013 Curriculum, the aspects measured in the
situation before implementing the cue cards were understanding the task,
pronunciation, grammar, fluency, and politeness. Politeness was measured
because it was related to the attitude on introducing somebody.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
42
2. The Research Instruments Used during the Implementation
There were five research instruments which during the implementation of
cue cards. Those instruments were observation checklist, field notes,
questionnaire, focus group interview and speaking test.
a. Observation Checklist
Observation was very important in the classroom action research. By doing
observation, the researcher had an illustration of the real situation in the class
which was being observed. During the observation in the implementation of cue
cards, the observer checked the list that has been prepared. According to Best
(1981, p. 162), checklist consists of a prepared list of items which is used to
indicate that an individual has completed the tasks. Best (1981) adds “the
presence or absence of the items may be indicated by checking yes or no…” (p.
162).
In this research, observation checklist was used to check whether all points
that should be done during the teaching and learning process had occurred or not.
There were three main points that should be observed. The first one was the
learning process. The second point was about teaching skills and strategies. The
third point was about the learners. The presence or absence of the item was
indicated by checking “yes” or “no”. The observation checklist was filled by the
observer during the teaching and learning process in the class.
b. Field Notes
Field notes were used to report the results of observation. Hopkins (1993, p.
116) states that the advantages of field notes are field notes can focus on a
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
43
particular issue or teaching behavior over a period of time and reflect on general
impression of the classroom. By having field notes in this research, the researcher
could examine what had gone well and what things needed to be improved in
details. Field notes were written down by the observer who was present in the
classroom in which the implementation of cue cards was conducted.
c. Questionnaires
Elliot (1991) says that questionnaires are “ways of eliciting other people’s
observation and interpretations of situations and events, as well as their attitudes
towards them” (pp. 81-82). According to Hopkins (1993, p. 134), the advantages
of questionnaires are the ways of obtaining information are simple and quick.
Hopkins (p. 134) also mentions that questionnaires dig up more information from
the students. In this research, the questionnaires were distributed to the students to
find out how the students responded to the implementation of cue cards.
Questionnaires were distributed in the end of every cycle. The researcher needed
to know how the students perceived the implementation of cue cards as well as
whether or not they felt that they benefited from the carried out research.
Questionnaires used in this research helped the researcher find out the
problem which was faced by the students individually. The questionnaires
consisted of two parts. The first part consisted of ten closed-ended questions while
the second part consisted of five open-ended questions. In the first part of the
questionnaires, question one up to six dug up the students’ personal reflection
toward their improvement in speaking skill. Question seven up to ten dug up the
students’ perception about the use of cue cards during the teaching and learning
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
44
activities. The options of the answer for the closed questions were strongly agree,
agree, disagree, and strongly disagree.
The researcher chose to use closed-ended questions because the researcher
did not want to make the students confuse when they were answering the
questions in the questionnaires. On the other hand, the researcher also used open-
ended questions because the researcher wanted to dig up deeper information from
the students. According to Wallace (2010, p. 135), the advantage of closed
questions in the questionnaires is to make the questionnaires easier to fill in. On
the same page, Wallace also mentions the advantage of open-ended questions is to
yield more data.
d. Semi-structured Focus Group Interviews
Frankel and Wallen (1993) explain interview is “an important way for the
researcher to check the accuracy of the impressions he or she has gained through
observation” (p. 384). The researcher used the interview to find out what the
students thought and how the students felt about the use of cue cards in improving
their speaking skill. On the other hand, the researcher conducted interviews to
clarify the students’ answers in the questionnaire which was given to them.
The type of interview which was used by the researcher was semi-structured
focus group interview. According to Lichtman (2013, p. 189), focus group
interviews involve group of people at one time and give opportunities to interact
each other. In addition, Lichtman (2013) adds semi-structured focus group
interview is “focus group interview in which the researcher has developed a list of
questions and has a preconceived plan for proceedings” (p. 208).
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
45
In conducting the interview, the researcher prepared a list of questions as the
interview guide. Semi-structured focus group interviews were conducted in the
end of every cycle. The participants of the semi-structured interview were chosen
randomly. There were two focus group interviews in every cycle in which there
were 5-6 students in each group.
e. Speaking Test
Speaking test was conducted to measure the students’ speaking ability after
the implementation of cue cards. The speaking test was conducted at the end of
every cycle of this research. To conduct the speaking test, the students were given
the communication cards. The students performed a conversation using the cues
provided on the cue cards. While the students were performing in front of the
class, the researcher conducted the assessment. According to Brown (2004, p.
157) three are some aspects that could be assessed in speaking skills. Those
aspects were grammar, vocabulary, comprehension, fluency, pronunciation and
task.
Based on the 2013 Curriculum, there were two aspects which should be
measured in the speaking tests. They were cognitive aspect and affective aspect.
In this research, the cognitive aspect consisted of the understanding of the task,
pronunciation, grammar, and fluency. Meanwhile, the affective aspect consisted
of politeness and enthusiasm. To measure those aspects, the researcher used a
rubric which had been modified from many sources.
There were six aspects measured in speaking activities. The first aspect was
students’ understanding on task. It included how far the students understood and
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
46
completed the task. The second aspect was pronunciation. It included how the
students pronounced the English words. The third aspect was grammar. It
included how the students produced the expressions in the correct form. The
fourth aspect was fluency. It included the students’ speed in delivering the speech.
The fifth and sixth aspects were politeness and enthusiasm. Those characteristics
included the students’ attitude in having communication with other people. Each
aspect was labeled by score one up to five. Each score had own criteria. The
criteria of each score could be seen below.
Table 3.1 The Rubric for Speaking Tests
No Aspect Score Criteria
1 Task
1 Minimal attempt to complete the task and/or responses
frequently inappropriate.
2 Partial completion of the task yet needs help in handling any
complication or difficulties.
3 Partial completion of the task, responses mostly appropriate
yet undeveloped.
4 Completion of the task responses appropriately and
adequately developed.
5 Completion of the task perfectly, responds with elaboration.
2 Pronun-
ciation
1 Frequent errors, little or no communication.
2 Some mispronunciations and a very heavy accent make
understanding difficult, require frequent repetition.
3 Mispronunciations do not interfere with understanding,
show the “foreign accent”
4 Errors in pronunciation are quite rare.
5 No conspicuous mispronunciations.
3 Grammar
1 Frequent inadequate and/or inaccurate use of basic language
structure.
2 Producing constant errors frequently shows uncontrolled of
using major patterns.
3 Producing constant errors that cause misunderstanding.
4 Producing some errors but it can be understood.
5 Control of grammar is good. Few errors, with no pattern of
failure.
4 Fluency
1 Speech is so halting with long pauses and/or incomplete
thoughts.
2 Speech is very slow and/or with frequent pauses, few and no
incomplete thoughts for short or routine sentences.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
47
No Aspect Score Criteria
3 Speech is frequently hesitant; can manage to continue and
complete the idea.
4 Speech is occasionally hesitant, with some unevenness
caused by rephrasing and groping for words.
5 Speech is almost fluent, effortless and smooth, but
perceptibly non-native in speech and evenness.
5. Politeness
1 Showing uncooperative and irresponsible attitude, less
interaction and respect for others, not giving any respond.
2 Occasionally showing cooperation and respect for others,
sometimes giving the respond.
3 Showing cooperation and respect for others, always giving
the respond, but it requires motivation from the teacher.
4 Demonstrating respect most of the time, having good
interaction with the other students.
5 Always showing respect for others (both to the teacher and
classmates) and responsibility; can work well with everyone.
6 Enthu-
siasm
1 Consistently showing little or no effort; passive all the time.
2 Not putting forth an effort to be able to speak well; passive
most of the time.
3
Occasionally showing the effort to be able to speak well and
having acceptable demonstration of willingness to perform
to the best of his/her ability.
4
Having good demonstration of willingness to perform to the
best of his/her ability; occasionally working at a challenging
level.
5
Having excellent demonstration of willingness to perform to
the best of his/her ability; almost working at a challenging
level.
(Modified from: Sample Assessment Tools, page 4 and 30; A Collection of Performance
Task and Rubrics: Foreign Languages, page 39; Brown (2004, pp. 172-173; Hughes
(1989, pp. 111-112))
E. Data Analysis Technique
Merriam (2009) states that “data analysis is the process of making sense out
of data, which involves consolidating, reducing, and interpreting what people
have said and what the researcher has seen and read…It is the process of making
meaning” (p. 176). The data gathered before the implementation and during the
implementation were analyzed to find out whether or not cue cards used in the
teaching and learning activity could effectively and efficiently improve the
students’ speaking skill. The instruments that the researcher used to gather the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
48
data were field notes, interview, observation checklist, questionnaire and speaking
test. Data gathered from questionnaire and speaking test were included in
quantitative data while data gathered from field notes, interview and observation
checklist were included in qualitative data.
The data gathered from the questionnaires were analyzed quantitatively and
qualitatively. The closed-ended questions were analyzed quantitatively and
presented in the form of numbers and percentage. The open-ended questions were
analyzed qualitatively and presented in the form of short descriptions. Since the
closed-ended questions in the questionnaire used Likert scale, the researcher
analyzed the students’ answers by using the formula which was defined by Hoel
(1971, p. 16) and Vaus (2002, pp. 193-195). The formula is presented as follows.
Note:
n : the number of the students who choose the option.
Σn : means the total number of the students
There were 10 items of closed-ended questions. The students had to put
check on the item which showed their responses. Each response had different
points: “Strongly agree” had 4 points, “agree” had 3 points, “disagree” had 2
points, and “strongly disagree” had 1 point. As a result, the lowest point of each
student was 10, while the highest point was 40. The mean score between 10 and
40 was 25. Hence, if the mean score equals to or is less than 25, it causes a
negative perception. The formula is clarified as follows.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
49
(Hoel, p. 16)
The next data which would be analyzed were data gathered from the
speaking tests. The researcher conducted speaking tests in every cycle in order to
measure the students’ improvement in speaking. From this speaking test, the
researcher would know how effective and efficient the cue cards were. There were
six aspects that would be measured. They were the understanding of the task,
pronunciation, grammar, fluency, politeness and enthusiasm. The score for each
aspect was one and the maximum score was five. To find the final score, the
researcher used the formula defined by Brown (2004, p. 157) and Hughes (1989,
p. 220). Therefore, the final score for each student would be in the following
formula:
The results of the interviews were analyzed by summarizing and
paraphrasing the students’ answers. The interview data would be the confirmation
description to the results of the questionnaire. The data gathered from field notes
and observation checklist were analyzed by summarizing them into a form of
description. Then, data gathered from the interviews, questionnaire, field notes,
(Task+Pronunciation+Grammar+Fluency+Politeness+Enthusiasm) x 100
____________________________________________________________ = 100
30
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
50
observation checklist and speaking test would be the foundation of the final
conclusion.
To obtain the credibility and validity of the data, the researcher used data
triangulation. According to Johnson and Larry (2012), data triangulation was
defined as “the use of multiple data sources using a single method” (p. 270). In
this classroom action research, the data being triangulated were taken from
interviews, field notes, observation checklist, questionnaire and speaking tests.
Data triangulation would help the researcher to determine the relationship
among the results of the students’ speaking test, the student’ perception on the use
of cue cards in improving their speaking skill, and what happened in the
classroom during the implementation. This relationship would be the foundation
to answer how the cue cards improve the students’ speaking skill in X Kimia
Industri of SMK Negeri 2 Depok.
Data triangulation also helped the researcher to decide whether the
researcher needed to continue the cycle or to end the cycle. To end the cycle, the
researcher determined the criteria of success. There were two criteria of success.
The first one was 75% of the students got speaking scores more than the minimum
score, 75. The second criterion was the students perceived positively to use of cue
cards.
F. Research Procedure
This section provides the procedures done by the researcher. There were seven
steps. The explanation of each step is shown as follows.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
51
1. Asking to Permission
To conduct the research in SMK Negeri 2 Depok, the researcher asked
permission letter to Dinas Pendidikan Kabupaten Sleman. Then, the researcher
went to the headmaster of SMK Negeri 2 Depok to get approval. After that, the
researcher met the English teacher who was recommended by the headmaster. The
researcher asked permission to conduct the research in one of the classes which
the teacher taught. At last, the teacher gave permission to the researcher to
conduct the research in X Kimia Industri.
2. Observing X Kimia Industri Class in SMK Negeri 2 Depok
The researcher observed the class to find out the problems faced by the
students in X Kimia Industri Class on 18 July, 8 August and 15 August 2014.
Besides observing the class, the researcher interviewed the students to know about
their needs in studying English and their knowledge about expressions in daily
conversation. In the end of this first step, the researcher analyzed the results of
the observation and interview.
3. Planning the Research
After observing the class, the researcher built the research strategy to
overcome the problem which had been analyzed. The researcher chose the
material and constructed the lesson plan for the teaching and learning process. In
this step, the researcher also chose what kinds of cue cards which are appropriate
to the students’ need and characteristics. Then, the researcher designed some
speaking activities or techniques to implement cue cards.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
52
4. Preparing the Instruments
In this step, the researcher prepared all instruments which would be used in
the research. The instruments consisted of the instruments used before the
implementation and during the implementation.
5. Collecting Data
Collecting data started when the researcher implemented the cue cards to the
students in X Kimia Industri of SMK Negeri 2 Depok. During the implementation
of cue cards, the researcher observed everything happening in the classroom. To
observe the class, the researcher was helped by an observer and the English
teacher of X Kimia Industri of SMK Negeri 2 Depok. The observers completed the
field notes and observation checklist provided. Then, to dig up the students’
perception about the use of cue cards, the researcher distributed questionnaire and
conducted semi-structured focus group interview.
6. Analyzing and Reflecting the Data
In this step, the researcher analyzed the data gathered using data
triangulation. All of the data gathered corroborated with each other. The results of
corroborating were reflected in the end of every cycle. From the reflection in the
first cycle, the researcher knew what was still needed to improve in the next cycle.
From the reflection done at the end of the last cycle, the researcher concluded
whether or not cue cards could improve the students’ speaking ability.
7. Reporting
After completing the data analysis, the researcher wrote a report about the
results of this classroom action research.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
53
CHAPTER IV
RESEARCH RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
This chapter discusses the results found in this research related to the use of
cue cards to improve the students’ speaking ability. The discussion is presented in
two main parts. The first part discusses the description of the use of cue cards to
improve the students’ speaking ability. The second part discusses the contribution
of cue cards to improve the students’ speaking ability.
The description of the use of cue cards in every cycle will be presented,
since this is classroom action research. This classroom action research was
conducted in three cycles. Each cycle consisted of planning, acting, observing and
reflecting. The first cycle was conducted on August 29th
, 2014. The second cycle
was conducted on September 5th
and 12th
, 2014. Then, the third cycle was
conducted on September 19th
and 26th
, 2014. The researcher distributed
questionnaires and conducted an interview in every cycle. The results of both
were analyzed to corroborate the results taken from the students’ speaking test,
observation checklist, and field notes.
A. The Description of the Use of Cue Cards
This section is divided into three parts. They are the use of cue cards in
cycle one, the use of cue cards in cycle two, and the use of cue cards in cycle
three. The first cycle was completed in one meeting, while each the second cycle
and the third cycle was completed in two meetings respectively. The duration of
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
54
each meeting was set to 90 minutes because the time allocation for English lesson
was two contact hours in which one contact hour consisted of 45 minutes.
Basically the researcher planned each cycle would be conducted in one
meeting. Nevertheless, after the first meeting, the researcher found that one
meeting was not enough to conduct all the learning steps in the 2013 Curriculum.
There were five learning steps in the 2013 Curriculum that should be applied in
the teaching and learning process. In addition, the topics for cycle two and three
were not familiar to the students. Thus, the researcher negotiated with the real
English teacher for X Kimia Industri class of SMK Negeri 2 Depok about the time
allocation. Finally we decided to set two meetings for each cycle two and three.
By doing so, all of the approaches in the 2013 Curriculum could be conducted
and the students would have more time to explore the new material.
1. The Use of Cue Cards in Cycle One
Before conducting cycle one, the researcher indentified the students’
problems by looking at the results of the observation. The most problematic
evidence that the researcher found in X Kimia Industri of SMK Negeri 2 Depok
was in speaking English. The students were not confident to speak in English.
The students admitted speaking in English was very hard and scary. The students
did not have any idea about what they were going to speak in the conversation.
The students had very limited English vocabulary that made them create filler
such as “ehmmmm….” The students were not accustomed to speaking English
spontaneously. When the students had to practice speaking in the class, the
students would like to ask the teacher to give extra time to write the script down
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
55
before they practiced. They did not have enough time to practice speaking. Their
time to practice speaking in the class or outside the class was limited so that the
students were never accustomed to speaking English. In addition, the results of
the speaking test for the first topic in the 2013 Curriculum was not satisfying
enough. Table 4.1 presents the results of the students’ speaking scores before the
implementation of cue cards.
Table 4.1 The Students’ Speaking Scores before
the Implementation of Cue Cards
Student Task Pronun-
ciation Grammar Fluency
Polite-
ness
Final
Score
Minimum Score
(75)
1 3 2 2 2 4 52.0 Need improvement
2 3 2 2 1 4 48.0 Need improvement
3 3 2 2 2 4 52.0 Need improvement
4 2 2 2 1 4 44.0 Need improvement
5 2 2 2 2 4 48.0 Need improvement
6 2 2 2 2 4 48.0 Need improvement
7 3 2 2 2 4 52.0 Need improvement
8 2 2 2 2 4 48.0 Need improvement
9 3 2 2 2 4 52.0 Need improvement
10 3 2 2 1 4 48.0 Need improvement
11 3 2 2 2 4 52.0 Need improvement
12 3 3 3 2 4 60.0 Need improvement
13 2 2 2 2 4 48.0 Need improvement
14 2 2 2 2 4 48.0 Need improvement
15 3 2 3 2 4 56.0 Need improvement
16 4 3 3 3 4 68.0 Need improvement
17 3 2 2 1 4 48.0 Need improvement
18 3 2 3 2 4 56.0 Need improvement
19 4 3 3 2 4 64.0 Need improvement
20 4 3 3 3 4 68.0 Need improvement
21 2 2 2 2 4 480 Need improvement
22 4 3 3 2 4 64.0 Need improvement
23 4 3 3 2 4 64.0 Need improvement
24 2 2 2 2 4 48.0 Need improvement
25 4 2 3 3 4 64.0 Need improvement
26 2 2 2 2 4 48.0 Need improvement
27 3 3 2 3 4 60.0 Need improvement
28 3 2 2 2 4 52.0 Need improvement
29 3 2 2 2 4 52.0 Need improvement
30 3 2 2 2 4 52.0 Need improvement
31 4 3 3 3 4 68.0 Need improvement
32 4 2 3 3 4 64.0 Need improvement
Average 2.97 2.25 2.34 2.06 4 54.5
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
56
Based on Table 4.1, it can be seen that students’ speaking skill was very
poor. None of the students got score, 75, which was as the minimum score
decided by the school policy and the 2013 Curriculum. The average of the final
score was only 54.5. The students’ understanding about the task was 2.9, which
meant that the students could finish the task completely but the students needed a
confirmation from the teacher. The pronunciation of the students was the lowest
aspect. The average of the pronunciation score was 2.25 and it was rounded into
2. From the rubric of the speaking test (see Appendix 9), score 2 in the
pronunciation section means that the students mispronounced many words.
The students tended to produce frequent repetition that was difficult to be
understood. The grammar and the fluency of the students were also not good. The
average score for the grammar and the fluency was under 3. The students
produced constant errors frequently. The students did not master the use of
expressions in introducing. The students’ fluency was the lowest score in the
average. The speed was slow and there were frequent pauses. The students could
not complete the ideas even for short or routine sentences.
To solve the problem that the students faced, the researcher decided to use
cue cards in teaching speaking skill. The researcher conceived that cue cards
would be an alternative solution to solve the students’ problems. Cue cards
contained the texts and pictures which gave the ideas during the speaking. On the
other hand, cue cards combined with some teaching techniques required the
students be accustomed to speaking in English. Therefore, the students became
more confident and were not afraid of making mistakes. The detailed explanation
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
57
of the use of cue cards in cycle one would be presented in the explanation as
follows.
a. Planning
Considering the students’ problems, the researcher decided to use cue cards
as the media in teaching speaking skills. From the review of the theories in
Chapter Two, cue cards can help the students to improve their speaking skills. To
use the cue cards in cycle one, the researcher designed a lesson plan for one
meeting. The activities on the lesson plan were designed based on the steps in
Scientific Approach in the 2013 Curriculum that were necessary to be
accomplished by the students.
The researcher tried to design the classroom activities as interesting as
possible. It aimed to help the students to be more enthusiastic in class activities.
The approach that was used in cycle one was Scientific Approach which consisted
of 5 main activities, namely observing, questioning, experimenting, associating,
and communicating or networking.
In the planning stage, the researcher also designed the cue cards. In designing
the cue cards, the researcher considered the students’ need and the topic. The need
of vocational students in novice level was the students were able to speak for daily
conversation in English spontaneously. The topic for cycle one was Expressions
of Asking and Responding to Request. In cycle one, the technique used to
implement the cue cards was the card game. Playing the card game was chosen
since it was quite familiar to them. By playing the card game, the researcher
expected that the students were interested in doing the speaking activities.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
58
To minimize the explanation, the researcher designed the handout. The
handout contained the examples of Expressions of Asking and Responding to
Request and the examples of the use of those expressions in dialogues. By using
the handouts, the students could read the materials by themselves so that the
researcher did not need to explain all materials. Otherwise, the researcher just
needed to deliver the main points to the students.
To assess the students’ improvement on their speaking skills, the researcher
prepared assessment sheet and rubric. The speaking aspects assessed were task
completion, pronunciation, grammar, and fluency. To support the assessment in
Curriculum 2013, there was also assessment for attitude. The attitude aspects
assessed here were politeness and enthusiasm since those characters were related
to the speaking ability.
b. Acting
In the acting stage, the researcher had a role as the classroom teacher. The
focus of the first cycle was helping the students be accustomed to speaking
English. The topic of the first cycle was Expression of Asking and Responding to
the Requests. The objectives of the lesson were the students were able to use the
Expressions of Asking and Responding to Requests and practiced the Expression
of Asking and Responding to Requests for daily conversational (see Appendix 1).
The researcher began the action by checking the student’s readiness to
follow the lesson. The first activity of Scientific Approach, which was observing,
was conducted by asking some students to stand up, open the window, close the
door, and take out the book using the Expression of Asking Request. Then, the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
59
researcher asked the whole class to guess what the expression was. Because there
were a lot of answers from the students, the researcher needed to confirm the
correct answer and told that it was the material they were going to learn.
After the students knew the correct answer, the researcher asked the
students to observe the material by watching a video. The researcher asked the
students to watch and listen to the video carefully. The video was about a
conversation between two people using the Expression of Asking and Responding
to Requests. The speed of the speeches was not really fast, so it was easy to catch
the main idea of the conversation. The students watched the video twice. After the
second playing, the researcher gave some grading questions about the general idea
of the video. It aimed to dig up the students’ understanding about the conversation
they heard. There were only some students who could answer the questions. To
help the other students, the researcher confirmed the answers and asked some
students to repeat it.
The next activity for the students was to find out the Expressions of
Asking and Responding to Requests in the video. The students were successful in
finding all of the expressions. After that, the students repeated the conversation in
the video and identified the structure of the text. The repeating activity was so
useful for the students so they knew what the correct intonation was. Because the
time was so limited, the students only repeated the expression once. In identifying
the structure of the text, the teacher helped the students to conclude the formula of
making appropriate Expression of Asking and Responding to Requests.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
60
The handout which was prepared by the researcher was distributed to the
students after formulating the sentences of Expressions of Asking and Responding
to Requests. To create deep understanding of those expressions, the researcher
asked the students to read. According to the 2013 Curriculum, after the students
observed the material that they were going to learn, the students asked questions
related to the material they were learning. This was the questioning activity. In
cycle one, this activity could not be conducted successfully although the
researcher had given the “hook” to encourage the students to be more critical.
Most of the students were still afraid of speaking English.
The next activity was experimenting. Cue card would be used in this step.
The researcher started the third step by showing a slide which consisted of a
picture and two words. From showing the slide, the teacher asked the students to
make Expressions of Asking and Responding to Requests. The researcher
prepared five slides to do this activity. This activity was the pre-work to
implement the cue cards.
In cycle one, the researcher conducted the card game to implement the cue
cards. This game aimed to make the students be accustomed to speaking English.
The card game required the students to repeat the sentences of Expressions of
Asking and Responding to Requests in many times.
To conduct the game, the researcher divided the students into seven
groups. There were 27 students so there were three up to four students in each
group. To explain the way to play the card game, the researcher invited four
students to come in front of the class. The researcher explained how to play the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
61
card game and the rules of the game. This simulation was needed since the rules
of the game were quite a lot and the time was so limited. After everybody in the
class understood how to play it, the researcher allowed them to sit in group. Then,
the researcher distributed the cards and asked them to find difficult words.
The students started to play the card game by shuffling the cards. Then,
the cards were distributed to each member of the group. In the beginning, each
member of the group only got four cards. Then, the remaining cards were put in
the center. Most of the students understood how to play it because playing the
cards like this was quite familiar to them.
This game required the students to have interaction with their friends. This
game involved the students to use the Expressions of Asking and Responding to
Requests. To play this game, one of the members asked for a request to another
member using the clues provided in the card. If the member asked had the same
card, he or she gave the card to the one who asked for the request by giving the
positive response. If the student, who was asked, did not have the same card, he or
she could refuse the request by giving negative response. Meanwhile the student
who asked for the request took a new card from the remaining ones in the center.
The winner of the game was the one who could collect the twin cards the most.
Figure 4.1 A Cue Card for Expressions of Asking and Responding to Requests
(repair)
chain
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
62
Figure 4.1 is the example of cue cards used for Expressions of Asking and
Responding to Requests. On the cue cards for Expressions of Asking and
Responding to Requests, there would be a picture and two words. The word above
the picture was the verb while the word below the picture was the noun. Both the
words were related to the picture. This is the illustration of the interaction.
Figure 4.2 The Illustration of the Conversation
In situation 1, student A made an expression using the clues “repair” and
“chain.” Using those clues, student A asked a request to student B. In situation 1,
student B had the card which consisted of picture of chain, the words “repair” and
the word “chain.” So, student B gave the card while giving positive response. In
situation 2, student A asked an expression of request to student B using the clues
“repair” and “chain.” In situation 2, student B did not have the card which
consisted of picture of chain, the words “repair” and the word “chain.” Therefore,
student B did not give the card to student A. In this case, student B gave the
negative response while student A took a new card from the remaining card in the
center.
Situation 1
Student A : Can you repair the chain?
Student B : With pleasure. (Give the card to student A)
Situation 2
Student A : Can you repair the chain?
Student B : I am sorry, I can’t.
Student A : (Take a card from the remaining card in the center)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
63
After finishing the game, the researcher asked the students about the game.
The researcher asked whether or not they enjoyed game. The students responded
positively. They answered that it was fun and they could understand better. To
confirm the students’ understanding, the teacher described some situations. From
the situations, the students were asked to make an Expression of Asking and
Responding to Request. Most of the students in X Kimia Industri of SMK Negeri
2 Depok were enthusiastic to complete the task.
c. Observing
The observing stage was done simultaneously with the acting stage. It could
not be separated. In the observing stage, the researcher observed every single
event happened during the teaching and learning activity. To do this observation,
the researcher was helped by observation checklists and the field note which were
completed by the observer.
In the beginning of the lesson, the first problem that was found by the
researcher was that the students were not ready to start the class. To make them
interested in this class, the researcher asked some students to do some actions
using the Expressions of Asking and Responding to Request. By doing so, the
students were curious about the material and ready to follow the lesson. The
researcher used a video which contained a conversation using Expressions of
Asking and Responding to Request to help the students conclude the material they
were going to learn. The students were interested in watching the video, listening
to the conversation and also repeating what the speakers said.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
64
The second problem found in X Kimia Industri of SMK Negeri 2 Depok was
the students were afraid of speaking English. They were afraid of making
mistakes and were not confident of their pronunciation, grammar, and intonation.
It was shown when the researcher gave the questions in English. The students
tended to answer in Bahasa Indonesia. The use of cue cards in this cycle could
help the students to be more confident. The students tried hard to speak English.
There were 12 students who were still shy when the researcher stayed close to
them. They tended to speak in English slowly. The remaining students had been
good and confident in speaking.
The students looked so enthusiastic. They enjoyed the game very much. Most
of the students understood how to play it. The teacher moved around the class and
reminded the students to speak English. The teacher also reminded the students to
use various Expressions of Asking and Responding to Request.
Playing the card game was very useful for the students to understand the
expression deeper. It also gave more chance to practice making requests in many
situations so that the students were accustomed to speaking English. The students
also could add their vocabulary range since there were many new vocabularies
from this game. The cue card game in this cycle could be categorized as
meaningful drill (Paulston, 1970). Meaningful drill is the drill in which the
students must have understood completely in grammar and meaning although
there is still a pattern to control the response. The students must understand the
meaning of the cues to make a meaningful interaction with their friends.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
65
Seeing the enthusiasm of the students when they were playing cue cards,
the researcher concluded that the goal of this material had been reached well. Cue
card really helped the students to understand the material deeper, gave the
students more speaking practice and increased their confidence to speak English.
d. Reflection
Reflecting on the findings in the cycle one, the researcher found that the
speaking skills of the students in X Kimia Industri of SMK Negeri 2 Depok
increased after they learned speaking by using cue cards. It could be seen from the
results of the speaking test in the end of the cycle. Table 4.2 is the students’
speaking scores in cycle one.
Table 4.2 The Students’ Speaking Scores in Cycle One
Student Task Pronun
-ciation Grammar Fluency
Polite-
ness
Enthu-
siasm
Final
Score
Minimum score
(75)
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Absent
2 4 2 3 2 5 4 66.7 Need improvement
3 4 3 3 3 5 4 73.3 Need improvement 4 3 2 2 2 5 4 60.0 Need improvement 5 3 3 4 3 5 4 73.3 Need improvement 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Absent
7 4 3 4 2 5 4 73.3 Need improvement 8 3 2 3 3 5 4 66.7 Need improvement 9 4 2 3 2 5 4 66.7 Need improvement 10 3 2 3 3 5 4 66.7 Need improvement 11 3 2 3 2 5 4 63.3 Need improvement 12 4 3 4 3 5 4 76.7 Successful
13 3 2 3 3 5 4 66.7 Need improvement 14 3 3 2 2 5 4 63.3 Need improvement 15 3 2 3 2 5 4 63.3 Need improvement 16 4 3 4 3 5 4 76.7 Successful 17 3 3 2 2 5 4 63.3 Need improvement 18 4 2 3 2 5 4 66.7 Need improvement 19 4 3 2 3 5 4 70.0 Need improvement 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Absent
21 4 2 3 2 5 4 66.7 Need improvement 22 4 3 4 3 5 4 76.7 Successful 23 4 3 3 3 5 4 73.3 Need improvement 24 3 2 3 2 5 4 63.3 Need improvement 25 4 3 4 3 5 4 76.7 Successful
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
66
26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Absent
27 4 3 4 3 5 4 76.7 Successful 28 3 2 2 2 5 4 60.0 Need improvement 29 4 2 4 2 5 4 70.0 Need improvement 30 3 3 2 3 5 4 66.7 Need improvement 31 4 3 4 3 5 4 76.7 Successful 32 4 3 4 3 5 4 76.7 Successful
Average 3,07 2,54 3,14 2,5 5 4 69.17
In Table 4.2, it could be seen that the students’ speaking scores were getting
increased. Although the average score was still under the minimum score in the
2013 Curriculum, the students’ speaking scores in the cycle one was better than
those in the preliminary study. Seven of the 28 students (25%) got scores more
than the minimum score, 75. The remaining students got scores under the
minimum score, 75. Their weaknesses were still in fluency and pronunciation.
Their average scores for the fluency and the pronunciation were still under the
score 3. Their average scores for the understanding of the task and the grammar
were above the score 3 but it still needed improvement.
The data gathered from the questionnaire showed that the students showed
positive perception to the use of cue cards in cycle one. The questionnaire was
distributed to the students who were present in the class. There were 28 students
but one student did not return the questionnaire. As described in Chapter Three,
the researcher calculated its mean score to conclude the data gathered from the
questionnaire. The perception is positive if the mean score is higher than 25. If the
mean score equals or is less than 25, it means that the students have a negative
perception.
In Table 4.3, the researcher could see the students’ perception about the use
of cue cards to improve their speaking skill in cycle one. In Table 4.3, the mean
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
67
score was 31.74, which meant that the mean score was higher than 25. It could be
concluded that the students’ perception about the use of cue cards in cycle one
was positive. The following table is the results of the questionnaire in cycle one.
Table 4.3 The Results of the Questionnaire in Cycle One
No Statements
Strongly
Disagree
(1)
Disagree
(2)
Agree
(3)
Strongly
Agree
(4)
1. Cue cards improve my English
speaking ability. 0
(0.00%)
2
(7.40%)
21
(77.77%)
4
(14.81%)
2. Cue cards give me the idea of
what I am going to say. 0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
19
(70.37%)
8
(29.6%)
3. I can speak more fluently after
learning English using cue cards. 0
(0.00%)
2
(7.40%)
21
(77.77% )
4
(14.81%)
4. I can speak more confidently
after learning English using cue
cards
0
(0.00%)
2
(7.40%)
21
(77.77%)
4
(14.81%)
5. I can speak naturally after
learning English using cue cards 0
(0.00%)
1
(3.70%)
21
(77.77%)
5
(18.52%)
6. I can speak spontaneously after
learning English using cue cards. 0
(0.00%)
4
(14.81%)
16
(59.25%)
7
(25.93%)
7. I am happy to study English
speaking using cue cards. 0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
20
(74.07%)
7
(25.93%)
8. Cue cards in teaching and
learning English is attractive. 0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
24
(88.88%)
3
(11.11%)
9. Cue cards motivate me to
participate more actively in the
teaching-learning activities.
0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
18
(66.66%)
9
(33.33%)
10. Using cue cards in teaching and
learning English is very useful. 0
(0.00%)
1
(3.70%)
18
(66.66%)
8
(29.6%)
Total X 0 12 199 59
Total X Point 0 24 597 236
Total Points 857
Mean 31.74
In general, the use of cue cards was running in accordance with the lesson
plan. The evidence was provided through field notes and observation checklist
filled in by the observer. The data gathered from observation checklist and field
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
68
notes presented that the students showed positive attitude to the implementation of
cue cards. The students were enthusiastic in playing the card game. They could
cooperate well with their peers. The students did the instructions given well. Some
students had dared to speak English for simple expression like “May I go to the
toilet?” or “Would you repeat once again, Miss?” The students also started to give
the responses in English like “all right, Miss” or “with my pleasure.” The students
had tried to reduce the words “sip” and “siap.”
Although the results of the speaking performances were getting better and the
students showed positive attitude to the use of cue cards, the researcher would like
to conduct the second cycle. The data gathered from the interview and
questionnaire showed that there were a lot of things that should be improved. Here
are the problems which were still found in the first cycle.
1) The students needed extra time to explore the new words. There were some
unfamiliar words for them. The students, who did not pay attention to the
researcher, did not know the meaning of the words and how to pronounce the
words properly. It was necessary to find the effective activity to introduce the
new words.
2) The students did not know the correct pronunciation of some words, for
example arrange, broth, carburetor, create, manufacture, pepper, polish,
rope, soak, and vegetable. The researcher would pay more attention to the
pronunciation and intonation since the pronunciation and intonation were two
of the requirements in having good speaking skill.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
69
3) The rules of the game were still quite confusing for the students although the
researcher provided the simulation.
4) Some students admitted that the cards were so small. It was difficult to shuffle
the card.
Based on this reflection in cycle one, the researcher decided to continue the
second cycle. The second cycle focused more on how the students developed the
idea when they were speaking. They needed to manage their idea to reduce
unnecessary pauses. In cycle two, the researcher would like to add a speaking
activity by using communication cards.
2. The Use of Cue Cards in Cycle Two
The second cycle was conducted on the 5th
and 12th
of September 2014. The
focus of the second cycle was on how the students developed the idea when they
were speaking. To conduct the second cycle, the researcher still followed the
stages of classroom action research proposed by Kemmis and McTaggart (1988).
The detailed explanation of the use of cue cards in cycle two would be presented
in the following explanation.
a. Planning
The researcher designed lesson plan as the guidelines to conduct the second
cycle. Cycle two was designed to solve the problems found in the first cycle of the
research. From the reflection done in the first cycle, the researcher focused more
on how the students developed the idea when they were speaking. The activities
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
70
on the lesson plan of cycle two were designed based on the standard competence
in the 2013 Curriculum that should be accomplished by the students.
In the planning stage of the second cycle, the researcher also designed the cue
cards, which were the main media applied in this research. The topic for cycle two
was Expressions of Giving and Responding to Compliments. In cycle two, the
techniques that were used to implement the cue cards were the card game and
communication card. Communication card contained the clues which involved
two students to make dialogue spontaneously.
The researcher also designed handouts to minimize the explanation. The
handouts contained the examples of Expressions of Giving and Responding to
Compliments and the examples of the use of those expressions in dialogues. By
using the handouts, the students could read the materials by themselves so that the
researcher did not need to explain all materials. Otherwise, the researcher just
needed to deliver the main points to the students.
To help the students who still had difficulty in understanding the meaning,
the researcher provided Power Point slides. On the slide, the researcher showed
the words and asked the students to find the difficult ones. It also gave chances to
the students to ask about the pronunciation of the words.
The researcher prepared the assessment sheet and also the rubric to assess the
students’ ability in speaking. The speaking aspects assessed were task completion,
pronunciation, grammar, and fluency. There was also assessment for attitude to
support the assessment in the 2013 Curriculum. The attitude aspects assessed here
were politeness and enthusiasm.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
71
b. Acting
In cycle two, there were two meetings. Each meeting consisted of 90 minutes.
The first meeting would be allocated to identify the pattern of Expression of
Giving and Responding to Compliments and to practice using the Expression of
Giving and Responding to Compliments in the form of meaningful drills.
Meanwhile, the second meeting would be used to practice the Expression of
Giving and Responding to Compliments for daily conversation. In this meeting,
the students would have speaking test.
1) First Meeting
In the beginning of the class, the students did not know the meaning of the
word “compliment”. It was not familiar for them. The researcher needed to give
brief illustration about it. In the observing activity, the students observed the
Expression of Giving and Responding to Compliments by watching a video. The
students watched the video three times. After the second playing, the teacher gave
some grading questions related to the general idea of the video to dig up the
students’ understanding. After the third playing, the students were asked to
mention the Expressions of Giving and Responding to Compliments. The students
successfully mentioned all of the expressions. The same as the previous cycle, the
students repeated the conversation in the video and indentified the structure of
Expressions of Giving and Responding to Compliments. Repeating the
conversation was important in order to know the correct intonation while
identifying the structure of those expressions helped the students produce the
expression with correct grammar.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
72
Due to the second activity of Scientific Approach which was questioning, the
students were expected to ask about the material. There was one student who
asked about adverbial of manner. The researcher invited the whole class to discuss
the questions since the understanding of adverbial of manner was quite important.
Fortunately, the students’ understanding about adverbial of manner was quite
good. Therefore it did not take a long time.
The next activity was experimenting. In this activity, the students experienced
to use the expressions. To give the experience, the researcher provided the card
game. The nature of the card game in cycle two was almost the same as the game
in cycle one. The goal of the card game in cycle two was the students were
accustomed to speaking English and able to produce the Expressions of Giving
and Responding to Compliments in correct pronunciation, intonation and
grammar. The technique used was meaningful drill, which was proposed by
Paulston (1970).
The researcher showed a slide which consisted of the words they were going
to use. This slide helped them to know the meaning and the pronunciation of the
words. This activity was important since the students’ vocabulary was still limited
and the students did not know the correct pronunciation. After that, the researcher
explained how to play the card game in this cycle. As the pre-work to conduct the
game, the researcher showed a slide which contained a picture and two words.
From showing the slide, the researcher asked the students to make an Expression
of Giving and Responding to Compliments. Then, the researcher showed some
other slides and gave the same task.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
73
The rules of the game were almost similar to the previous one. The students
sat in a group that consisted of four people. Every group got a set of cards. A set
of cards consisted of 25 pairs of cards. The total of the cards in one set of the card
game were 50 cards. After the cards were shuffled, the cards were distributed to
each member in the group. However, not all cards were distributed. In the
beginning, each member of the group only got four or five cards. The remaining
cards were put in the center.
The card game required the students to have interaction with their friends.
This game involved the students to use the Expressions of Giving and Responding
to Compliments. To play this game, one of the members gave a compliment to
another member using the clues provided in the card. If the member who was
asked had the same card, the one who produced the compliment gave the cards to
the one who was asked. The one who got the cards gave the response. If the
students asked, did not have the same card, he or she could not get the card.
Meanwhile the one who produced the compliment took a new card from the
remaining ones in the center. The winner of the games was the one who could
collect the twin cards the most.
Figure 4.3 A Cue Card for Expressions of Giving and Responding to Compliments
[cool]
car
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
74
Figure 4.3 is the example of the cue card used in the Expression of Giving
and Responding to Compliments. On this cue card, there would be a picture and
two words. The word above the picture was the adjective while the word below
the picture was the noun. Both the words were related to the picture. This is the
illustration of the interaction.
Figure 4.4 The Illustration of the Conversation
In situation 1, student A gave an expression of compliment to student B
using the clues “cool” and “car.” In situation 1, student B had the card which
contained picture of car, the words “cool” and the word “car.” Therefore, student
A gave the card to student B. Student B received the card while giving the
response. In situation 2, student A gave an expression of compliment to student B
using the clue “cool” and “car.” In situation 2, student B did not have the card
which consisted of picture of chain, the words “cool” and the word “car.”
Therefore, student B did not receive the card and prepared another reason to
respond to it. Meanwhile, student A took a new card from the remaining card in
the center.
Situation 1
Student A : What a cool car!
Student B : It’s kind of you to say that. (Get the card from student A)
Situation 2
Student A : What a cool car!
Student B : Yes, you are right, but this is not mine/ exactly. It is John’s car.
Student A : (Take a card from the remaining card in the center)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
75
After finishing the game, the researcher asked the students about the game
whether or not they enjoyed game. The students responded positively. They
enjoyed the game because it was fun and interesting. The students admitted that
they could understand the Expression of Giving and Responding to Compliments
better.
2) Second Meeting
Continuing the first meeting, the objective of second meeting was the
students could practice the Expression of Giving and Responding to Compliments
in the daily conversation. In the beginning, the researcher reviewed the previous
meeting. Most of the students remembered the previous material but they failed to
make Expression of Giving and Responding to Compliments in the form of
“how.”
After the students remembered on how to make Expression of Giving and
Responding to Compliments properly, the researcher continued the next activity
in the Scientific Approach. It was associating activity. The researcher gave
examples of Expression of Giving and Responding to Compliments in Bahasa
Indonesia to some students. Most of the students did not respond to the
expression. There were a few students who said “Terimakasih.” After asking
some students, the researcher asked the whole class to compare the Expression of
Giving and Responding to Compliments in Indonesian and Western cultures.
There was one student who answered that sometimes he felt uneasy if he
responded to compliment. He was afraid if the other people thought that he was
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
76
arrogant. There was a nice discussion. It helped the student to build their
characteristic as young people.
The next activity, which was communicating, was started by providing the
students a dialogue. The students were asked to read the dialogue. Comprehension
questions were given to dig up the students’ understanding about the dialogue.
The students also tried to read the dialogue loudly to practice their pronunciation.
Basically, this dialogue was used to help the students to perform a dialogue using
communication cards provided in front of the class. The following pictures are the
examples of communication cards used to build a conversation.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
77
Figure 4.5 Communication Cards for Expression of
Giving and Responding to Compliments
Figure 4.5 is a set of communication cards. A set of communication cards
consisted of two cards because it involved two students. Every student got one
card. The phrases, words or picture would be the guidance for the students to
build a conversation with their pairs. On the card, there were numbers which
showed the order of the conversation. To have this kind of activity, the researcher
prepared 16 sets of communication cards.
c. Observing
The observing stage of cycle two was done simultaneously with the acting
stage. In the observing stage, the researcher observed every single event happened
during the teaching and learning activity. To observe the acting stage, the
researcher was helped by observation checklist and field notes filled in by the
observer.
In the beginning of the class, the observing activity was really needed by
the students since the students did not have any knowledge about the compliment.
In the first meeting, the students observed the Expressions of Giving and
Responding to Compliments using a video. The video contained a conversation
between two people about those expressions. In the second meeting, a discussion
about those expressions was needed to remind the students about the previous
material.
During the implementation of cue cards, the students looked enthusiastic.
The students were interested in playing the card game and performing in front of
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
78
the class using communication cards. In the first meeting, the focus of playing the
card game was to make the students be accustomed to speaking the Expressions of
Giving and Responding to Compliments in English. By playing card game, the
students did not realize that they were learning a language. When they were
playing the card game, the students did not realize that they were repeating the
patterns of an expression in English.
Showing a slide that contained the words which the students were going to
use to play the card game was helpful for the students since the students did not
know the meaning of certain words. It gave the students chances to ask about the
pronunciation of the words. It aimed to make the card game more meaningful.
Thus, when the students were playing card game, the students also learned to
produce the expressions in the correct grammatical and pronunciation.
In the second meeting, the cue cards used were in the form of
communication cards. Communication cards were designed to make the students
build a communication using the information provided. Most of the students were
enthusiastic to perform a dialogue using the cue cards. The students’ speech was
better than the previous cycle. They could speak with few pauses. The students
could follow the cues provided on the cards. The students could produce the
meaningful conversation with their pairs. However, there were a lot of
mispronunciations that the students made but it was not as many as in the cycle
one.
Generally, the teaching steps were conducted very well. The activity that
had been prepared could attract the students to speak actively. The objectives in
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
79
the first meeting and the second meeting could be reached. The students were
enthusiastic to perform in front of the class. They felt confident to speak in
English. The students also had more time to practice speaking English. Most of
the students could understand how to give and respond to a compliment correctly.
There were still only seven students who were still passive and needed more
encouragement. The thing that should be improved from this teaching and
learning process was the students’ pronunciation. Some of the students did not
care how they pronounced the words.
d. Reflection
Reflecting on the findings in the cycle two, the researcher found that the
speaking skills of the students in X Kimia Industri of SMK Negeri 2 Depok
showed significant improvement. It could be seen from the results of the speaking
test in the end of the cycle. The students’ speaking scores in cycle two was better
than those in cycle one. The students were enthusiastic to speak in front of the
class. The students also looked more confident when they were playing the card
game and performing the dialogue in front of the class.
Table 4.4 is the results of the students’ speaking test. In Table 4.4, it could
be seen that 17 of the 31 students (54%) got scores more than the minimum score,
75. Fourteen students got scores under 75. The students’ understanding of tasks
was getting better. The students could follow the instruction and cooperated well
with their peers. Their fluency was also getting better. Since they practice
producing the expressions for many times, they had been accustomed to speaking
English. Their politeness and enthusiasm were also getting better since they
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
80
showed polite interaction to the teacher and to their peers. The following table is
the results of students’ speaking test in cycle two.
Table 4.4 The Students’ Speaking Scores in Cycle Two
Students Task Pronun-
ciation Grammar Fluency
Polite-
ness
Enthu-
siasm
Final
Score
Minimum score
(75)
1 4 3 4 3 5 5 80.0 Successful
2 4 2 3 3 5 5 73.3 Need improvement
3 4 3 4 3 5 4 76.7 Successful
4 3 2 3 3 5 4 66.7 Need improvement
5 3 3 3 3 5 4 70.0 Need improvement
6 3 2 3 3 5 4 66.7 Need improvement
7 4 3 4 4 5 5 83.3 Successful
8 3 2 3 4 5 4 70.0 Need improvement
9 4 3 4 3 5 5 80.0 Successful
10 3 3 3 3 5 4 70.0 Need improvement
11 3 2 4 3 5 5 73.3 Need improvement
12 4 3 4 4 5 4 80.0 Successful
13 3 2 4 3 5 4 70.0 Need improvement
14 3 3 3 3 5 4 70.0 Need improvement
15 3 2 4 3 5 4 70.0 Need improvement
16 4 3 4 4 5 5 83.3 Successful
17 3 3 3 3 5 5 73.3 Need improvement
18 4 3 4 3 5 5 80.0 Successful
19 4 3 4 3 5 5 80.0 Successful
20 4 3 4 4 5 5 83.3 Successful
21 4 3 3 3 5 5 76.7 Successful
22 4 3 4 4 5 4 80.0 Successful
23 4 3 4 3 5 5 80.0 Successful
24 3 2 4 3 5 4 70.0 Need improvement
25 4 3 4 3 5 5 80.0 Successful
26 3 3 3 3 5 4 70.0 Need improvement
27 4 3 4 3 5 5 80.0 Successful
28 3 2 3 3 5 4 66.7 Need improvement
29 4 3 4 2 5 5 76.7 Successful
30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Absent
31 4 3 4 3 5 5 80.0 Successful
32 4 3 3 4 5 5 80.0 Successful
Average 3.56 2.72 3.59 3.19 5 4.53 75.30
The data gathered from questionnaire showed that there was positive
perception to the use of cue cards in cycle two. Questionnaire was distributed to
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
81
the students who were present in the class. There were 31 students who were
present in the second meeting of cycle two. The following table is the results of
questionnaire in cycle two.
Table 4.5 The Result of the Questionnaire in Cycle Two
No Statements Strongly
Disagree Disagree Agree
Strongly
Agree
1 Cue cards improve my English
speaking ability. 0
(0.00%)
1
(3.26%)
22
(70.97%)
8
(25.80%)
2 Cue cards give me the idea of
what I am going to say. 0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
19
(61.30%)
12
(38.71%)
3 I can speak more fluently after
learning English using cue cards. 0
(0.00%)
1
(3.26%)
18
(58.06%)
12
(38.71%)
4
I can speak more confidently
after learning English using cue
cards
0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
20
(64.52%)
11
(35.49%)
5 I can speak spontaneously after
learning English using cue cards. 0
(0.00%)
2
(6.45%)
20
(64.52%)
9
(29.03%)
6 I can speak naturally after
learning English using cue cards 0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
24
(77.42%)
7
(22.58%)
7 I am happy to study English
speaking using cue cards. 0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
15
(48.39%)
16
(51.61%)
8 Cue cards in teaching and
learning English is attractive. 0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
17
(54.80%)
14
(45.16%)
9
Cue cards motivate me to
participate more actively in the
teaching-learning activities.
0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
21
(67.74%)
10
(32.26%)
10 Cue cards in teaching and
learning English is very useful. 0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
16
(51.62%)
15
(48.38%)
Total X 0 15 202 94
Total X Point 0 30 606 376
Total Points 1012
Mean 32.65
In Table 4.5, the researcher could see the students’ perception about the use
of cue cards to improve their speaking skill. As described in Chapter Three, the
researcher calculated its mean score to conclude the data gathered from the
questionnaire. The perception is positive if the mean score is higher than 25. If the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
82
mean score equals or is less than 25, it means that the students have a negative
perception. In Table 4.5, the mean score was 35.16. It could be concluded that the
students’ perception about the use of cue cards was positive.
The same as the previous cycle, the use of cue cards was running in
accordance with the lesson plan. The evidence was provided through field notes
and observation checklist filled in by the observer. Through the observation
checklist and field notes, the data presented that the students showed positive
attitude to the implementation of cue cards. They were enthusiastic in playing the
card game and performing the dialogue. They also could cooperate well with the
other students.
Although the results of the speaking performance were getting better and the
students’ perception about the use of cue cards was positive, the researcher needed
to conduct the third cycle. The third cycle was still needed since only 54 % of the
students in X Kimia Industri of SMK Negeri 2 Depok got scores more than the
minimum score, 75. On the other hand, there were two problems still found in the
second cycle. The first problem was the time allocation to play the card game and
perform the dialogue was too short. The second problem was the students’
pronunciation was still weak. In the next cycle, the researcher would use another
technique in using cue cards to confirm that the students’ speaking skill had
improved.
3. The Use of Cue Cards in Cycle Three
The third cycle was conducted on 19th
and 26th
September 2014. Based on the
reflection on the previous meeting, the researcher focused more on building the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
83
idea in order to be able to speak fluently. The third cycle of the research still
followed the stages of classroom action research proposed by Kemmis and
McTaggart (1988). The detailed explanation of the use of cue cards in cycle three
would be presented in this following explanation.
a. Planning
The researcher designed lesson plan as the guidelines to conduct the third
cycle. In cycle three, the researcher focused more on building the idea in order to
be able to speak fluently. The activities on the lesson plan in cycle three were
designed based on the standard competence in the 2013 Curriculum that should be
accomplished by the students.
In planning stage of the third cycle, the researcher designed the cue cards. In
designing the cue cards, the researcher still considered the students’ need and the
topic. The students’ need here was the students should be able to speak in English
spontaneously in daily conversation. The topic for cycle three was Expressions of
Plans and Intentions. In cycle three, the techniques used to implement the cue
cards were the card game and the communication game. Communication cards
used in cycle three were different from communication cards in cycle two.
Communication cards in cycle three were simpler and there were fewer words.
Those would be challenging for the students to develop the idea.
To minimize the explanation, the researcher designed handouts. The handouts
contained the examples of Expression of Plans and Intentions and the examples of
the use of those expressions in dialogues. Using the handouts, the students could
read the materials by themselves so that the researcher did not need to explain all
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
84
materials. Otherwise, the researcher just needed to deliver the main points to the
students.
To help the students who still had difficulties in understanding the meaning,
the researcher provided Power Point slides. On the slides, the researcher would
show the words used in the card game and communication game. Then, to assess
the students’ ability in speaking, the researcher prepared the assessment sheet and
the rubric. The speaking aspects assessed were task completion, pronunciation,
grammar, fluency, politeness and enthusiasm.
b. Acting
In cycle three, there were two meetings. Each meeting consisted of 90
minutes. The first meeting would be allocated to identify the pattern of Expression
of Plans and Intentions. Meanwhile, the second meeting would be used to practice
using the Expression of Plans and in the form of meaningful drills and practice the
Expression of Plans and Intentions for daily conversation.
1) First Meeting
Because the time allocation was only 70 minutes and the students were still
weak in recognizing future tense, the researcher did not apply any cue cards in this
meeting. The objective of the lesson in the first meeting was the students were
able to identify the Future Tense which was the foundation of using the
Expression Plans and Intentions. The students really needed to understand how to
construct appropriate future sentences.
The activities of first meeting consisted of observing, questioning, and
experimenting. In observing activity, some students were invited to write their
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
85
plans for Saturday night. Through the plans that the students wrote, the researcher
invited them to identify the structure of Future Tense. In identifying the tenses,
the researcher guided them to make the negative and the interrogative of Future
Tense. After indentifying the structure, the students were given chance to ask
about the material. There were some students who asked about the difference of
using “be going to” and “will.” After the discussion, the researcher continued the
next activity which was experimenting. The activity for the students was listening
to the words and phrases related to the dialogue which they were going to listen.
2) Second Meeting
The focus of meeting two in the cycle three was applying all the cue cards to
develop their idea in speaking. There were two kinds of cue cards which were
going to be applied. The first cue cards were for playing the card game and the
second ones were for making dialogue.
There were only three activities of Scientific Approach which would be
applied. The first activity, which was observing activity, was done by asking the
students to imagine what they were going to do on holiday. After around three
minutes, the students were asked to share their imagination. There were three
students who shared their imagination. The three students could reveal their
imagination using simple present tense and future tense. Although they made
some mistakes, it was good. The students had been confident to speak for the
whole class. This technique aimed to remind them about the previous material.
Observing step ended after reviewing the use of “be going to” and “will.”
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
86
The second step, which was experimenting, was done by applying cue cards
in the form of card game. The pre-work for this game was the same as the
previous game. The teacher showed a slide contained a picture and two words,
which were as the clues to make future tense.
Figure 4.6 A Cue Card for Expressions of Plans and Intentions
On the cue cards for Expressions of Plans and Intentions, there would be a
picture and two words. The word above the picture was the verb, while the word
which the picture was the noun. Both the words were related to the picture.
The rules of the game were almost the same as the previous ones. The
students sat in a group which consisted of four people. Every group got a set of
cards. After the cards were shuffled, the cards were distributed to each member of
the group. However, not all cards were distributed. In the beginning, each member
of the group only got four cards. Then, the remaining cards were put in the center.
Most of the students understood how to play this game because playing cards like
this was quite familiar for them.
This game required the students to have interaction with their friends. This
game involved the students to use the Expressions of Plans and Intentions. To
(repair)
chain
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
87
play this game, one of the members asked about a plan to another member using
the clues provided in the card. If the member who was asked had the same card,
he or she gave the card to the one who asked. If the one who was asked did not
have the same card, the one who asked took a new card from the center. The
winner of the games was the one who could collect the twin cards the most. This
is the illustration of the interaction using the cue cards in cycle two.
Figure 4.7 Illustration of the Conversation
In situation 1, student A made an expression using the clues “repair” and
“chain.” Then, student A asked a plan to student B. In situation 1, student B had
the card which consisted of picture of chain, the word “repair” and the word
“chain.” Therefore, student B gave the card to student A. Meanwhile in situation
2, student B did not have the card which consisted of picture of chain, the word
“repair” and the word “chain.” Therefore, student B did not give the card to
student A. In this case, student B told a reason while student A took a new card
from the remaining card in the center.
Situation 1
Student A : Are you going to repair the chain? / Will you repair the chain?
Student B : With pleasure. (Give the card to student A)
Situation 2
Student A : Are you going to repair the chain? / Will you repair the chain?
Student B : No, I am not. My chain is not broken.
Student A : (Take a card from the remaining card in the center)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
88
The next activity, which was communicating, was started by providing the
students a dialogue. The students were asked to read the dialogue. Comprehension
questions were given to dig up the students’ understanding about the dialogue.
The students also tried to read the dialogue loudly to practice their pronunciation.
This dialogue was an illustration of the dialogue they were going to perform using
communication cards provided. The pictures in Figure 4.8 are the examples of
communication cards used to build a conversation.
Figure 4.8 Communication Cards for Expression of Plans and Intentions
The pictures in Figure 4.8 are the examples of communication cards which
used in cycle three. On the cards, there were some pictures and clues for holiday
plans. This communication game involved two students to have dialogue of
planning during the holiday. There were eight sets of communications cards.
There were 16 groups that practiced speaking in front of the class. Thus, one set
of communication cards would be performed twice.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
89
c. Observing
The observing stage of cycle three was done simultaneously with the acting
stage. In the observing stage, the researcher observed every single event happened
during the teaching and learning activities. To observe in the acting stage, the
researcher was helped by observation checklist and field notes written by the
observer.
In the first meeting of cycle three, the focus was helping the students to
understand the structure of future tense since the students’ understanding of future
tense was weak. This meeting was very important for the speaking activities on
the second meeting of cycle three. Future tense was the foundation of using the
Expression of using the Expression of Plans and Intentions.
On the first meeting, the students studied deep on how to produce Future
Tense using “will” and “be going to.” They also learned how to produce the
negative sentences, interrogative sentences and WH questions. On the first
meeting, there was not any implementation of cue cards.
Cue cards were started to be implemented in the second meeting of cycle
three. The first cue cards implemented were used for playing the card game.
During the card game, the researcher observed the class and made sure that the
students really spoke in English. The researcher found that the students used the
variations of Expression of Plans and Intentions. The students had been
accustomed to speaking English. They were not shy and did not reduce their voice
volume when the teacher observed them closely.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
90
On the second implementation of cue cards, the students performed a
dialogue using the communication cards. Before performing, the researcher
introduced them an example of dialogue. Then, the students were given five
minutes to prepare the dialogue. Surprisingly, the students could perform dialogue
very well. The students were successfully in making questions using “be going
to.” They could produce long sentences. Their fluency also had been improved.
There were fewer unnecessary pauses so that the students could speak more
naturally.
d. Reflection
Reflecting on the findings in the cycle three, the researcher found that the
speaking skills of students in X Kimia Industri of SMK Negeri 2 Depok was
getting better after they learned speaking by using cue cards. It could be seen from
the results of the speaking test in the end of the cycle. The students’ speaking
scores in the third cycle was better than those in the previous cycles. Cue cards in
the third cycle of this research had successfully helped the students to improve
their speaking ability.
Table 4.6 shows the students’ speaking scores in cycle three. In table 4.6, it
could be concluded that students’ speaking ability was increasing. Twenty eight of
the 32 students (88%) got scores more than the minimum score, 75. Only four
students got scores less than the minimum score in the 2013 Curriculum. The
average score of the students’ understanding of tasks was above 4, which meant
that the students could complete the task appropriately. Some of them built a
conversation with some elaboration. The use of expression was getting better.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
91
During the speaking test, the students produced appropriate grammar and could
reduce the mistakes. Their fluency was also getting better. They could produce
long sentences without any mistakes. Table 4.6 is the results of students’ speaking
test in cycle three.
Table 4.6 The Students’ Speaking Scores in Cycle Three
Student Task Pronun
-ciation Grammar Fluency
Polite
-ness
Enthu
-siasm
Final
Score
Minimum score (75)
1 4 3 4 3 5 5 80.0 Successful
2 4 3 4 4 5 5 83.3 Successful
3 4 3 4 4 5 4 80.0 Successful
4 3 3 3 4 5 4 73.3 Need improvement
5 4 3 4 3 5 4 76.7 Successful
6 3 3 3 3 5 4 70.0 Need improvement
7 4 3 4 4 5 5 83.3 Successful
8 3 3 3 4 5 4 73.3 Need improvement
9 4 3 5 4 5 5 86.7 Successful
10 4 3 4 4 5 4 80.0 Successful
11 3 3 4 4 5 5 80.0 Successful
12 5 3 5 4 5 4 86.7 Successful
13 4 3 4 4 5 4 80.0 Successful
14 4 3 3 4 5 4 76.7 Successful
15 4 2 4 4 5 4 76.7 Successful
16 5 3 5 4 5 5 90.0 Successful
17 4 3 3 4 5 5 80.0 Successful
18 4 3 4 5 5 5 86.7 Successful
19 4 3 4 5 5 5 86.7 Successful
20 5 4 4 4 5 5 90.0 Successful
21 5 3 3 5 5 5 86.7 Successful
22 5 4 4 5 5 4 90.0 Successful
23 5 3 4 4 5 5 86.7 Successful
24 4 3 4 3 5 4 76.7 Successful
25 5 3 4 4 5 5 86.7 Successful
26 4 3 3 4 5 4 76.7 Successful
27 5 3 4 4 5 5 86.7 Successful
28 4 3 4 3 5 4 76.7 Successful
29 4 3 4 4 5 5 83.3 Successful
30 3 3 3 3 5 4 70.0 Need improvement
31 5 3 4 5 5 5 90.0 Successful
32 5 3 4 4 5 5 86.7 Successful
Average 4,16 3.03 3,84 3,94 5,00 4,53 81.67
The data gathered from questionnaire showed that students’ perception about
the use of cue cards to improve their speaking ability in cycle three was positive.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
92
There were 32 students who filled in the questionnaire. Table 4.7 shows the
results of questionnaire distributed in cycle three.
Table 4.7 The Results of Questionnaire in Cycle Three
No Statements
Strongly
Disagree Disagree Agree
Strongly
Agree
1. Cue cards improve my English
speaking ability. 0
(0.00%)
1
(3.12%)
20
(62.5%)
10
(31.25%)
2. Cue cards give me the idea of
what I am going to say. 0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
20
(62.5%)
12
(37.5%)
3. I can speak more fluently after
learning English using cue cards. 0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
19
(59.38%)
13
(40.62%)
4. I can speak more confidently
after learning English using cue
cards
0
(0.00%)
2
(6.25%)
21
(65.6%)
9
(28.12%)
5. I can speak naturally after
learning English using cue cards 0
(0.00%)
1
(3.12%)
21
(65.6%)
10
(31.25%)
6. I can speak spontaneously after
learning English using cue cards. 0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
22
(68.75%)
10
(31.25%)
7. I am happy to study English
speaking using cue cards. 0
(0.00%)
1
(3.12%)
17
(53.13%)
14
(43.75%)
8. Cue cards in teaching and
learning English is attractive. 0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
17
(53.13%)
15
(46.87%)
9. Cue cards motivate me to
participate more actively in the
teaching-learning activities.
0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
19
(59.38%)
13
(3.12%)
10. Cue cards in teaching and
learning English is very useful. 0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
15
(46.87%)
17
(53.13%)
Total X 0 5 191 125
Total X Point 0 10 573 500
Total Points 1093
Mean 34.15
In table 4.7, the researcher could see the students’ perception toward the use
of cue cards to improve their speaking skill. As described in Chapter Three, the
researcher calculated its mean score to conclude the data gathered from the
questionnaire. The perception is positive if the mean score is higher than 25. If the
mean score equals or is less than 25, it means that the students have a negative
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
93
perception. In table 4.7, the mean score was 32.40. It could be concluded that the
students’ perception about the use of cue cards was positive.
The second part of questionnaire, which consisted of five open-ended
questions, showed the students’ personal opinions about the use of cue cards in
teaching and learning. According to the students, cue cards were very useful in
learning speaking skills. The cues on the cards helped the students to speak
spontaneously. Moreover, learning speaking using cue cards was interesting and
did not make them felt bored or sleepy. It was also fun and did not make them
afraid although the chances of speaking English were a lot.
The interview was conducted after the students filled in the questionnaire
since the goal of conducting interview was to confirm the students’ answers in the
questionnaire. The students also confirmed that the cue cards were very useful in
learning speaking skills. The students confirmed that cue cards helped them to
understand the material faster and deeper. The students also admitted that they felt
more confident because they had practiced to produce those expressions for many
times.
The same as the previous cycle, the use of cue cards was running in
accordance with the lesson plan. The evidence was provided through field notes
and observation checklist filled in by the observer. Through the observation
checklist and field notes, the data presented that the students showed positive
attitude to the use of cue cards. The students were enthusiastic in playing the card
game and performing the dialogue.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
94
The researcher stopped the cycle in cycle three because all the criteria of
successfulness had been reached. The first criteria, which was more than 75% of
the students got scores more than 75, had been achieved since 88% of the students
got scores more than 75. The second criteria, which was the students perceived
positively toward the use of cue cards and their speaking improvement, had also
been achieved.
B. Contribution of Cue Cards to Improve the Students’ Speaking Ability
Before cue cards were applied during the teaching and learning English, the
students in X Kimia Industri of SMK Negeri 2 Depok faced a lot of problems in
speaking. The first problem that the students had was the students were not
confident to speak in English. Most of the students admitted that speaking in
English was very hard and scary. The second problem was the students did not
have any idea about what they were going to speak in the conversation. The
students did not know how to start a conversation or build a conversation into a
meaningful conversation.
The third problem was the students had very limited English vocabulary. As a
result, the students tended to create some fillers such as “ehmmmm….”, “duh apa
yaa...” It was difficult for the students to speak fluently. The fourth problem was
the students were not accustomed to speak in spontaneous condition. When the
students had to practice speaking in the class, the students tended to write the
script down before they practiced. The last problem which the students had was
they did not have enough time to practice. Their time to practice speaking English
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
95
in the class or outside the class was also limited and therefore the students were
never accustomed to speaking English.
To see the contribution of cue cards to the improvement of the students’
speaking skill, the researcher corroborated the data gathered from all of the
instruments. The result gathered from cycle one until cycle three showed that cue
cards helped the students improve their speaking skill. The cue cards which were
designed in cycle one enhanced the students’ confidence in speaking. The card
game done in cycle one helped the students be more accustomed to speaking
English and not to be afraid of making mistakes.
The cue cards designed in cycle two enhanced the students’ ideas when they
were speaking. They needed to manage their idea in order to reduce unnecessary
pauses so that the students could speak fluently and naturally. The students’
improvement on developing ideas for speaking could be seen from their
performances using communication cards. Most of the students were enthusiastic
to perform a dialogue using the communication cards. The students could follow
the cues provided on the cards and produced the meaningful conversation with
their peers.
Cycle three was conducted to confirm that the students had improvement on
developing ideas and enough vocabulary in order to speak fluently without many
unnecessary pauses. The cue cards in cycle three helped the students build the
speaking ideas in order to speak in English spontaneously and fluently. Because
cycle three was confirming cycle, the cue cards designed were more challenging
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
96
than previous cycles. However, the students enjoyed the activities and were more
enthusiastic.
The contribution could be seen from the results of the students’ speaking test.
Their understanding of the task, pronunciation, fluency, and grammar were
getting better. The students could understand the instructions well. The students’
pronunciation was also getting better since they listened to and repeated the
conversation in the video provided. The improvement of their speaking skills was
also followed by their attitude aspects. They were more polite and enthusiastic in
the class. The students showed respect and tolerance not only to the teacher but
also to the other students.
Figure 4.9 The Comparison of the Students’ Speaking Scores
from Cycle One until Cycle Three
Figure 4.9 shows the three kinds of lines which represented the improvement
in each cycle. The blue line showed the results of the students’ speaking test in
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
97
cycle one. The red line showed the results of the students’ speaking test in cycle
two. The green line showed the results of the students’ speaking test in cycle
three. Through figure 4.9, it could be seen that the red line was higher than the
blue line. Then, the green line was higher than the red line. Therefore, it could be
concluded that there was improvement toward the aspects of speaking skill every
cycle.
In order to corroborate the results deducted from the students’ speaking
scores, the researcher distributed the questionnaire to all the students who were
present in the class. The questionnaire was distributed in the end of every cycle.
There were two parts in the questionnaire. The first part consisted of 10 closed-
ended questions. Questions 1-6 reflected the students’ perception about the use of
cue cards. Questions 7-10 reflected the students’ personal reflection to what they
had got after learning speaking English using cue cards. The second part, which
consisted of 5 open-ended questions, reflected the students’ opinion on the use of
cue cards during teaching and learning process.
To find the perception in the first part of the questionnaire, the researcher
calculated the mean scores. As described in Chapter Three, the researcher
calculated its mean score to conclude the data gathered from the questionnaire.
The perception is positive if the mean score is higher than 25. If the mean score
equals or is less than 25, it means that the students have a negative perception.
The mean scores showed that the students’ perceptions from cycle one until cycle
three were positive. The mean scores in cycle one, cycle two and cycle three were
31.74, 35.16 and 34.15.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
98
The second part of questionnaire consisted of five open-ended questions.
Questions one up to three were designed to look into the students’ personal
feeling about their participation in the use of cue cards. Questions four up to five
were designed to look into the strengths and weaknesses of the use of cue cards.
From cycle one until cycle three, the students wrote that they felt more confident
to speak in English because there were a lot of friends who also tried to speak in
English. The students also admitted that learning speaking English was fun and
not stressful. Related to the focus of cycle two, the students admitted that cue
cards helped them to develop their ideas for speaking. The students could speak
spontaneously. In short, cue cards were useful in the teaching and learning process
and could improve their speaking ability.
When the students were asked about the strengths and weaknesses of the use
of cue cards, the students mostly wrote that using cue cards made learning English
become more interesting and less boring. On the other hand, the weakness that
most of the students found was the use of time. They wrote that the time for
learning English was too short.
The data from questionnaire were also supported on the interview conducted
in the end of every cycle. The results of the interview with five randomly selected
students showed that the students enjoyed the card games done in cycle one and
hoped that they could learn using card games more frequently. The students
admitted that cue cards helped them understand the material more easily and
faster. Cue cards also gave them idea. Therefore, the students felt more confident
in speaking.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
99
Student 12 : “Senang juga mbak, ngerti pelajarannya lebih cepat dan lebih
dalam karena langsung praktek bicara pakai permainan kartu.”
(I am also happy, Miss. I can understand the material faster and
deeper because I can directly practice speaking in English using
card game.)
Student 28 : “Sama mbak, senang. Gambar dan kata-kata yang di dalam kartu
itu ngasih gambaran, nanti aku bakal ngomong apa.” (I feel the
same as the others. The picture and the words on the cards give
me the idea on what I am going to say.)
Student 27 : “Kalau saya lebih PD aja kan gambar dan kata-kata yang ada di
kartu bisa jadi gambaran buat nanti mau ngomong apa.” (I feel
more confident because the picture and the words give me ideas
on what I am going to say.)
In cycle two, the results of the interview with five randomly selected students
showed that the students could speak fluently because they had repeated the
expression for many times. During the card game, the students were required to
produce the expressions a lot. Therefore, during the communication game, which
was more challenging, the students did not have a lot of problems in producing
the expressions and could speak more fluently.
Student 29 : “Kartunya itu kan untuk latihan ngomong kan kak, dan karena itu
dilakukan berulang kali jadi bisa dong di akhir pelajaran.” (The
cards were for practicing speaking, weren’t they Miss? I have
repeated the expression. Therefore, it is not difficult to understand
the material in the end of the lesson.)
Student 31 : “Kalau saya lebih lancar aja mbak.” (For me, cue cards help me
to speak more fluently, Miss.)
In cycle three, the results of the interview with five randomly selected
students showed that the students were interested in the cards which were
designed for the cards games and communication games. The students admitted
that it was easier for them to build the ideas during the speaking. The students
could speak more spontaneously.
Student 24 : “Iya mbak, minggu lalu pembahasan tentang will and be going to
dalam banget, jadi ga gampang lupa. Kalau hari ini, permainan
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
100
kartunya variatif, ada yang kita harus ngomong di depan segala.
Asyik sih mbak.” (The discussion of the use of “will” and “be
going to” was deeper on last week (the first meeting of cycle
three), so I do not forget the material easily. For today, the card
games are variety. We have time to practice speaking in front of
the class. It is fun, Miss.)
Student 1 : “Lebih lancar mbak, kadang otomatis. Contohnya juga kayak pas
kita buat pertanyaan. Kalau jawabannya ini pasti pertanyaannya
pake ini dan begini.” (I can speak more fluently. Sometimes it
looks we speak automatically. For example, when we are asking,
if the answer is about the place, we must use WH-questions
“where” for asking.)
The students’ achievement was also recorded in the field notes and
observation checklist filled in by the observers. Field notes and observation
checklist also recorded that the students followed the instructions of the teacher
enthusiastically. In the field notes, the observers also wrote that the learning goals
could be reached and cue cards were successfully implemented. The comment
written by the observers in the field notes and observation checklist are shown as
follows.
The learning objectives that the students could identify future tense,
produced future tense and practiced speaking well could be reached. All
the students could practice speaking in front of the class. The fluency of
the students was getting better. There was less unnecessary pauses so that
the students could speak more naturally. (field notes of cycle 3, meeting 2)
At last, all the data had been shown by the researcher. Through all the
research findings in this chapter, it could be concluded that cue cards could
improve the speaking ability of the students in X Kimia Industri of SMK Negeri 2
Depok.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
1
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This chapter presents the conclusions and recommendations of this
research. The former is obtained from the major findings of this research. The
latter is intended to the current practice and the future research.
A. Conclusions
Based on the results of the students’ speaking tests and their response to
the implementation of cue cards monitored in all meetings, it was concluded that
the use of cue cards to improve students’ speaking skills in X Kimia Industri of
SMK Negeri 2 Depok was successfully conducted. It could be seen from the
results of speaking tests. The average of the final scores in cycle one was 6.91
and only seven of the 28 students (25%) got higher scores than 75. The results of
speaking test were getting better in cycle two. The average test score in cycle two
was 7.53 and 17 of the 31 students (54%) got higher scores than 75. The numbers
of the students who got scores more than 75 were increasing in cycle three.
Twenty eight of the 32 students (88%) got scores more than 75 while the average
score in cycle three was 8.17.
The data through the questionnaire and interview showed that the students
enjoyed participating in playing card games and performing dialogues in front of
the class. The students were motivated to perform better throughout all the
meetings. The card games and communication game made the students learn in a
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
102
pleasant atmosphere, which eventually helped them to reduce their fear or
shyness.
The data gathered through observation checklist and field notes supported
that the use of cue cards helped the students solve their speaking problems. Most
of the students could speak in English more confidently. They admitted that
learning to speak English using the cue cards was fun and enjoyable. They could
develop their ideas and spoke more fluently with less unnecessary pauses because
they had adequate vocabulary. Using the cue cards several times, the students had
been accustomed to speaking spontaneously.
B. Recommendations
There are several things that can be done to improve the current practice of
teaching speaking in vocational school. Most vocational school students in SMK
Negeri 2 Depok pay greater attention to their majors, such as architecture, mining
and automobile. They tend to think that English is not as important as the other
major-related subject. In order to avoid the worst effect of this condition, it is
important to vary the methods of teaching English itself to attract students’
attention. The use of cue cards is one of the alternative techniques to teach
speaking to the vocational students. Cue cards which are combined with games or
other speaking activities require the students to participate actively. It can help the
students to be more confident in speaking. Cue cards which consist of words and
picture can help the students to develop their ideas to speak more fluently. Cue
cards provide the vocabulary which they need so that they will not produce
unnecessary pauses.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
103
For the purpose of future research, it is important to bear in mind that
classroom action research should be done to improve the practice of teaching and
learning. The researcher expects that the future researchers can use cue cards to
help the students improve other speaking aspects like pronunciation, accuracy or
intonation. The results of this research may be used as a reference for research
topics related to the improvement of teaching speaking. As research results may
differ depending on the context and participants, it is recommended to adapt the
most suitable procedures which will be used to implement the cue cards.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
1
REFERENCES
Best, J. W. & Khan, J. V. (1981). Research in education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall.
Borg, W. R., Gall, J. P. & Gall, M. D. (1983). Educational research: An
introduction. New York: Longman Inc.
Boyd, M. A. (2007). Psychiatric nursing: Contemporary practice. Philadelphia:
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Publisher, Inc.
Briggs, L. J. (1977). Principles of instructional design. New York: Holt, Rinehart
and Winston.
Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices.
San Francisco: Longman.
Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to
language pedagogy. New York: Longman.
Burns, A. & Goh, C.C. M. (2012). Teaching speaking: A holistic approach. New
York: Cambridge University Press.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2014). Materi pelatihan guru implementasi
kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Elliot, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Philadelphia: Open
University Press.
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design evaluation research
introduction. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.
Gebhard, J. G. (1996). Teaching English as a foreign or second language: A
teacher self-development and methodology guide. Ann Arbor, MI: The
University of Michigan Press.
Gerlach, V. S., Donal, P. E., & Melnick, R. (1973). Teaching and media: A
systematic approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching. New York: Pearson
Longman.
Hedge, Tricia. (2011). Teaching and leaning in language classroom. Shanghai:
Oxford University Press.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
105
Hoel, P. G. (1971). Elementary statistics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Hopkins, D. (1993). A teacher's guide to classroom research. Buckingham: Open
University Press.
Hughes, R. (2002). Teaching and researching speaking. London: Pearson
Education.
Johnson, B & Christensen, L. (2012). Educational research: Quantitative,
qualitative and mixed approaches. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner. Victoria:
Deakin University Press.
Lichtman, M. (2013). Qualitative research in education: A user’s guide. London:
SAGE Publications Ltd.
Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative language teaching: An introduction.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Luoma, S. (2005). Assessing speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McNiff, J. (1009). Action research principles and practice. New York: Routledge
Falmer.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and
implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mills, G. E. (2011). Action research: A guide for the teacher reseacher. Boston:
Pearson.
Mora, E. (1994). Using cue cards to foster speaking and writing. Retrieved May
30th
, 2013, from http://eca.state.gov/forum/vols/vol32/no4/p36.pdf
Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching and learning. Boston: Heinle &
Heinle Publisher
Nunan, D. (2003). Practical english language teaching. New York: Mc Graw-
Hill Companies.
Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2003). Permendikbud no. 81 A tahun
2013
Sayer, P. (2005). An intensive approach to building conversation skills. ELT
Journal, 59, 14-22.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
106
Soeharto. (1988). Desain instruksional: Sebuah pendekatan praktis untuk
pendidikan teknologi dan kejuruan. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan
Kebudayaan.
Supriadi, D. (2002). Sejarah pendidikan teknik dan kejuruan di indonesia
membangun manusia produktif. Bandung: Rosdakarya
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2003). Approaches and methods in language
teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rivers, W. M. (1983). Communicating naturally in a second language.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vaus, D. (2002). Surveys in social research. London: Routledge.
Wallace, M. J. (2010). Action research for language teacher. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press
Walter, T. (2004). Teaching language learners. New York: Pearson Education
Inc.
Zarefsky, D. (1996). Public speaking strategies for success. Boston: Allyn &
Bacon.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
107
APPENDICES
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
108
Appendix 1
Letter of Permission
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
109
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
110
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
111
Appendix 2
Lesson Plan and Teaching Instrument
of Cycle One
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
112
LESSON PLAN
Name of School : SMK Negeri 2 Depok Sleman
Subject : English
Grade/Semester : X/1
Topic : Asking and Responding to Request
Meeting : 1 (1 x meeting)
Time Allocation : 2 x 45 minutes
A. Inner Competence
1. Experiencing and applying the values of the religion.
2. Experiencing and applying the values of honesty, responsibility,
discipline, care, cooperation, peacefulness, politeness, liveliness, and
tolerance; showing the attitude as the part of solutions in the daily
interactive communication and placing themselves as the reflection of
nationality.
3. Understanding, applying, and analyzing the factual, conceptual and
procedural knowledge based on the curiosity of science, technology, art,
culture and humanities by the concept of humanism, nationalism and
civilization related to the cause of phenomena; applying procedural
knowledge on the specific subject suitable with the interest in solving
problems.
4. Processing, reasoning and showing the concrete and abstract things related
to the development from the learning and teaching process independently
using the scientific methods.
B. Material Basic Competence
1. Being grateful to God for the chance to study English which is as the
International communication means by showing the spirit.
2. Showing honesty, discipline, confidence, and high-responsibility in doing
transactional conversation with the teacher and friends
3. Analyzing the social function, grammatical and linguistic of the expression
of asking and responding to a request in the daily conversation
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
113
Indicators :
a. Students are able to identify the expressions of asking and responding
to requests
b. Students are able to use the expressions of asking and responding to
requests politely
4. Arranging the dialogue about expression of asking and responding to
requests based on the correct social function, grammatical and linguistic in
the daily conversation.
Indicator:
Students are able to practice on how to ask and respond to requests with
great enthusiasm.
C. Learning Objectives
At the end of this activity, the students are able to use the expression of
asking and responding to request politely and apply the expression of asking
and responding to request in the daily life communication by showing
honesty, confidence, discipline and responsibility.
D. Material
1. Function : Asking and Responding to Request
2. The structure of the text :
• Can you lend me your dictionary, please?
• Will you call me at 7 o’clock?
• Could you read the announcement for me?
• Would you please tell me your phone number?
• Would you mind checking my homework, please?
• Would you like to turn off the air conditioner, please?
3. Grammatical Formula :
Modal
auxiliary
Subject Basic form
of verb
Object/adverb Please
Would
Could
Can
Will
you stay
lend
open
turn on
longer,
me your pencil,
the windows,
the fan,
please?
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
114
Modal
auxiliary Subject mind V-ing Object
Would
you mind closing
turning off
helping
the door?
the television?
me?
Modal
auxiliary Subject like to infinitive object
Would
you like to close
to turn off
to help
the door?
the television?
me?
E. Learning Method
1. Approach : Scientific Approach
2. Model : Discovery Learning
3. Technique : Role Play
F. Teaching Media and Source
a. Media : Cue cards, Video, PowerPoint, Handout
b. Equipment : Laptop, White/Black Board, Speaker
c. Source :
Hadfield, J. (1984). Elementary communication game. Essex: Longman
Lande, Shyla K. (2014). Forward for vocational school grade x. Jakarta:
Erlangga.
Pramesti, M. R. (2008). English for smk grade 1 - bse. Jakarta: Pusat
Perbukuan Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Richards, J.C. (2005). Interchange: teacher’s resource book 1. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press
Unit 6 Learn English - Making a Request. Retrieved July 25th
, 2013, from
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFyBj6CKGT0
Widyati, Utami. (2014). bahasa inggris (buku siswa). Jakarta: Pusat
Kurikulum dan Perbukuan, Balitbang Kemdikbud.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
115
G. Learning Activity
Activity Description Time
Allocation
Opening Ss respond the greetings from the teacher and pray
together.
“Good morning everybody?”
“How are you?”
“Before we start, let’s pray together. Who wants to
lead the prayer?”
T asks a question related the previous material.
My name is Ms. Besty. Ms. Besty doesn’t know your
name well. Who wants to introduce your name to
Ms. Besty?”
Ss try to find out the material and learning goals of
today’s lesson from the teacher.
Today, we are going to learn an expression that is
important in our daily conversation.
Can you ……?
Could you ……?
Would you like to …..?
Would you mind …….?
Can you guess what expression it is?
Ss accept the motivations to achieve the goals.
The goal of learning this expression is you are able
to use it in the daily conversation correctly. This
expression is very common and important, so you
have to learn to master it.
10’
Main Observing
Ss watch a video and listen to the conversation
Now, let’s watch a video and please listen to it
carefully.
Ss and T discuss the conversation in the video
How many people in the dialogue?
Who are they?
What are they talking about?
Does the man help her?
Ss mention the expressions that are found in the
video
When the woman asks the man to burn the CD,
what does she say?
and when the man accept the request, what does he
say?
Ss repeat the expressions of asking and responding
70’
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
116
Activity Description Time
Allocation
to request
Let’s see the review! Please repeat it!
Ss identify the characteristic of asking and
responding to request and the teacher help the
students to identify it.
Modals (Can, Could, Will, Would)+you+Verb
Base+ O/Adv?
Would you like + to V1+ O/Adv?
Would you mind + V-ing + O/Adv?
Questioning
Ss get the handout from the teacher
Please, help me to distribute this handout.
Ss read the handout for 2 minutes
Could you read your handout in 2 minutes?
Ss ask the question related to asking and
responding to request
Do you have any question related to asking and
responding to request?
Do we have to use “please”? What is the function
of the word “please”?
Exploration
T reads the expression of asking and responding to
request from the handout and Ss repeat it
Now, please repeat after me!
T mentions some situation
So, how do you say in English :
“bisa benerin motorku?”
“tolong buatkan aku kopi”
“tolong buka jendelanya”
“tolong nyalain acnya”
“tolong tutupin pintunya”
T shows some pictures and Ss confirm about what
they see
Now I will let you to have more practice.
can you see the picture?
what is it?
now, I provide a verb ….. which is the meaning is
……..
So, can you make an expression of asking request
using the word (n) …….. and (v) ………..?
and how do you respond it?
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
117
Activity Description Time
Allocation
T will show some cues so Ss can make an
expression of asking and responding to request
using the clues provided
Ss practice using expression of asking and
responding request using card games
Now, do you want to play games?
I need 4 volunteers to show you how to play it.
Association
Ss find the conclusion of playing card game,
especially on using expression of asking and
responding to request.
Can we change the subject you into “I”? Why?
Can we change the subject you into “he, she, it, or
they
Communication
Ss use the expression of asking and responding to
request based on the situation provided.
Imagine : tomorrow you will have an exam and now,
you want to study, but your brother is listening to the
radio loudly. You ask your brother to reduce the
volume of the radio. So, what will you say to him?
Next situation : ……….. (it will be provided in
PowerPoint)
Closing Ss review the learning activities they have done
So, what have you studied today?
how do you say in English if you ask your friend to
……….?
if your friend say “would you mind washing the
apple?”
if you do not mind, what will you say?
if you mind to wash the apple, what will you say?
T tells the follow-up activity for today’s lesson
Please, make a dialogue of making request based
on the theme provided.
10’
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
118
H. Assessment
Indicators of
Achievement Technique Instrument
Showing the attitude of
politeness in having
conversation and doing
group or individual
activities
Role play by playing card
game
Assessment Sheet and
Rubric
Showing the attitude of
enthusiasm in having
conversation and doing
group or individual
activities
Role play by playing card
game
Assessment Sheet and
Rubric
Applying the expression
of asking and responding
request in the class
activities
Performance test Assessment Sheet and
Rubric
Technique : Oral Test
Form : Role Play and Student’s Performance
Instrument :
a. Rubric
No Aspect Score Note
1 Task
1 Minimal attempt to complete the task and/or responses
frequently inappropriate.
2 Partial completion of the task yet needs help in handling any
complication or difficulties.
3 Partial completion of the task, responses mostly appropriate
yet undeveloped.
4 Completion of the task responses appropriately and
adequately developed.
5 Completion of the task perfectly, responds with elaboration.
2 Pronuncia
tion
1 Frequent errors, little or no communication.
2 Some mispronunciations and a very heavy accent make
understanding difficult, require frequent repetition.
3 Mispronunciations do not interfere with understanding, show
the “foreign accent”
4 Errors in pronunciation are quite rare.
5 No conspicuous mispronunciations.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
119
No Aspect Score Note
3 Grammar
1 Frequent inadequate and/or inaccurate use of basic language
structure.
2 Producing constant errors frequently that shows uncontrolled
of using major patterns.
3 Producing constant errors that cause misunderstanding.
4 Producing some errors but it can be understood.
5 Control of grammar is good. Few errors, with no pattern of
failure.
4 Fluency
1 Speech is so halting with long pauses and/or incomplete
thoughts.
2 Speech is very slow and/or with frequent pauses, few and no
incomplete thoughts for short or routine sentences.
3 Speech is frequently hesitant; can manage to continue and
complete the idea.
4 Speech is occasionally hesitant, with some unevenness caused
by rephrasing and groping for words.
5 Speech is almost fluent, effortless and smooth, but perceptibly
non-native in speech and evenness.
5. Polite-
ness
1 Showing uncooperative and irresponsible attitude, less
interaction and respect for others, not giving any respond.
2 Occasionally showing cooperation and respect for others,
sometimes giving the respond.
3 Showing cooperation and respect for others, always giving the
respond, but it requires motivation from the teacher.
4 Demonstrating respect most of the time, having good
interaction with the other students.
5 Always showing respect for others (both to the teacher and
classmates) and responsibility; can work well with everyone.
6 Enthu-
siasm 1 Consistently showing little or no effort; passive all the time.
2 Not putting forth an effort to be able to speak well; passive
most of the time.
3
Occasionally showing the effort to be able to speak well and
having acceptable demonstration of willingness to perform to
the best of his/her ability.
4
Having good demonstration of willingness to perform to the
best of his/her ability; occasionally working at a challenging
level.
5
Having excellent demonstration of willingness to perform to
the best of his/her ability; almost working at a challenging
level.
(Taken from: Sample Assessment Tools, page 4 and 30; A Collection of
Performance Task and Rubrics: Foreign Languages, page 39; Brown (2004, pp.
172-173; Hughes (1989, pp. 111-112) , elaborated by the researcher)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
120
Total Score : 100
Scoring :
(Task+Pronunciation+Grammar+Fluency+Politeness+Enthusiasm)x100
30
b. Assessment Sheet
No. Name Task Pronun-
ciation Grammar Fluency
Polite
-ness
Enthu
siasm
Final
Score
1 Gilang 2 Wahid 3 Allyza 4 Tia 5 Anik 6 Anisa 7 Dea 8 Desti 9 Dhimas 10 Dwi 11 Fany 12 Galus 13 Indri 14 Intan 15 Ira 16 Klemens 17 Lisa 18 Maria 19 Okta 20 Nony 21 Nada 22 Pita 23 Ilyas 24 Ria 25 Luthfi 26 Rara 27 Galuh 28 Ningsih 29 Fadilah 30 Siti 31 Sulis 32 Tasyaa
Depok, …… August 2014
Verified by, Designed by,
Main teacher Researcher,
Heri Afrahatu Rahmah, S.Pd Paulina Besty Fortinasari
NIP. 196810132007012009 NIM. 101214089
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
121
HANDOUT
Asking and Responding to Requests
Less Formal
• Sit down there!
• Close the door, please!
• Is it okay if I borrow your money?
Formal
• Can you lend me your dictionary, please?
• Will you call me at 7 o’clock?
• Could you read the announcement for
me?
• Would you please tell me your phone
number?
• Would you mind checking my homework, please?
• Would you like to turn off the air conditioner, please?
Accepting
• Sure.
• All right.
• I’d be glad to.
• Yes, certainly.
• Yes, I will.
• It’s a pleasure.
Refusing
• I’m sorry, I can’t.
• I’m afraid ... (give your reason)
• I’d like to, but ...(give your reason)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
122
Modals auxiliary for Expressing Requests
Modal
auxiliary Subject
Basic form
of verb Object/adverb please
Would
Could
Can
Will
You stay
lend
open
turn on
longer,
me your pencil,
the windows,
the fan,
please?
Modal
auxiliary Subject mind V-ing object
Would You mind closing
turning off
helping
the door?
the television?
me?
Modal
auxiliary Subject Like to infinitive object
Would
You like to close
to turn off
to help
the door?
the
television?
me?
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
123
How to Play Request Cue-Card
On the card, there are a picture and two words. The word above the picture is
verb, and the word below the picture is noun. Those picture and words will be the
clues for what the students are going to say.
The steps are:
1. Make a circle consisting of 4 students.
2. Shuffle the cards.
3. Distribute the cards until each member gets 5 cards. Put the remaining card in
the centre.
4. Choose the one who will start asking request. The player may only ask to one
student, for example, if there are A, B, C, and D. A can ask a request to B, C
or D only.
5. Use the expression appropriately. When the students ask a request, the
students must use the expression appropriately. Before the students ask,
please see the picture and read the words. Those picture and words will be the
clues to make a good expression.
6. Use the expression for accepting and refusing. The one who is asked a
request, he/she may accept or refuse the request depends on the cards that
he/she has. If he/she has, he/she must accept the request and give the card. If
he/she does not have, he/she must refuse the request and let the player to take
a card in the centre. Don’t forget to remind the students to use the expression
on responding to a request.
7. The winner is the one who can collect the twin cards the most.
8. The game will finish when the cards has been finish and each card has found
its twin.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
124
CUE CARDS
painting
(show)
carburetor
(fix)
chain
(repair)
window
(close) (edit)
document
(save)
money
(turn off)
computer alarm
(set) (mix)
eggs
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
125
cup of tea
(make)
house
(build) (paint)
wall
(draw)
face guitar
(play)
instant noodle
(cook)
robot
(create) (throw)
rubbish
(polish)
table
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
126
helmet
(wear) (help)
old womandigital camera
(operate)
wood table
(move) (charge)
battery
(cut)
onion
(sing)
Indonesia Raya air conditioner
(turn on)
Mr. Obama
(interview)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
127
(finish)
project
(cook)
chinese food
(pull)
rope
apple
(wash)
(send)
ball
(kick)
letter
(write)
(rinse)
cloth
(grind)
coffee
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
128
(publish)
product
(refine)
oil
(mill)
pepper
(steam)
vegetable
(soak)
Kidney bean
(boil)
potatoes
(pour)
honey
(heat)
broth
(freeze)
yogurt
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
129
Appendix 3
Lesson Plan and Teaching Instrument
of Cycle Two
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
130
LESSON PLAN
Name of School : SMK Negeri 2 Depok Sleman
Subject : English
Grade/Semester : X/1
Topic : Giving and Responding to a Compliment
Meeting : 2 meetings
Time Allocation : 4 x 45 minutes
A. Inner Competence
1. Experiencing and applying the values of the religion.
2. Experiencing and applying the values of honesty, responsibility,
discipline, care, cooperation, peacefulness, politeness, liveliness, and
tolerance; showing the attitude as the part of solutions in the daily
interactive communication and placing themselves as the reflection of
nationality.
3. Understanding, applying, and analyzing the factual, conceptual and
procedural knowledge based on the curiosity of science, technology, art,
culture and humanities by the concept of humanism, nationalism and
civilization related to the cause of phenomena; applying procedural
knowledge on the specific subject suitable with the interest in solving
problems.
4. Processing, reasoning and showing the concrete and abstract things related
to the development from the learning and teaching process independently
using the scientific methods.
B. Basic Competence
1. Being grateful to God for the chance to study English which is as the
International communication means by showing the spirit.
2. Showing honesty, discipline, confidence, and high-responsibility in doing
transactional conversation with the teacher and friends
3. Analyzing the social function, grammatical and linguistic of the expression
of giving and responding to a compliment in the daily conversation
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
131
Indicators :
a. Students are able to identify the expressions of giving and responding
to compliments
b. Students are able to use the expressions of giving and responding to
compliments politely
4. Arranging the dialogue about expression of giving and responding to
compliments based on the correct social function, grammatical and
linguistic in the daily conversation.
Indicator:
Students are able to practice on how to give and respond to compliments
with great enthusiasm.
C. Learning Objectives
At the end of this activity, the students are able to apply the expression of
giving and responding to compliments in the daily life communication by
showing honesty, confidence, discipline and responsibility.
D. Material
1. Function : Giving and Responding to a Compliment
2. The structure of the text :
• Excellent! You really did it well.
• That’s nice. I really like it
• It was great.
• Well done.
• Wow! Awesome!
• Good job!
• You look great today!
• How cold it is!
• How beautifully she sings!
• What a wonderful design!
• What lovely flowers!
• What a beautiful smile you have!
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
132
3. Grammatical Formula :
How Adj/Adv Subject Verb
How Big it is!
How Quickly he run!
What a/an Adj
Singular
Countable
Noun
Subject Verb
What a nice house It is!
What a beautiful smile She has!
What Adj Uncountable
or plural noun Subject Verb
What Lovely weather It is!
E. Learning Method
1. Approach : Scientific Approach
2. Model : Discovery Learning
3. Technique : Role Play
F. Teaching Media and Source
1. Media : Cue cards, Video, PowerPoint, Handout
2. Equipment : Laptop, White/Black Board, Speaker
3. Source :
Hadfield, J. (1984). Elementary communication game. Essex: Longman
Lande, Shyla K. (2014). Forward for vocational school grade x. Jakarta:
Erlangga.
Pramesti, M. R. (2008). English for smk grade 1 - bse. Jakarta: Pusat
Perbukuan Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Richards, J.C. (2005). Interchange: teacher’s resource book 1. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press
Unit 3: Admiration - How to speak English. Retrieved July 26th
, 2013, from
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWyLv6TAEH0
Widyati, Utami. (2014). bahasa inggris (buku siswa). Jakarta: Pusat
Kurikulum dan Perbukuan, Balitbang Kemdikbud.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
133
G. Learning Activity
Activity Description Time
Allocation
Opening Ss respond the greetings from the teacher and
pray together.
T asks a question related the previous material.
Ss try to find out the material and learning goals
of today’s lesson from the teacher.
Ss accept the motivations to achieve the goals.
10’
Main Observing
Ss watch a video and listen to the conversation
Ss and T discuss the conversation in the video
Ss watch a video once again and analyze the
expressions that are found in the video.
(T helps them to mention it by giving hook)
Ss repeat the expressions of giving and
responding to compliment
Ss identify the characteristic of giving and
responding to compliment. The teacher helps the
students to identify it.
How +adj/adv+S+V
What+a/an+adj+N+S+V
What+adj+UN+S+V
Questioning
Ss get the handout from the teacher
Ss read the handout for 2 minutes
Ss ask the question related to asking and
responding to request
Exploration
Ss read a dialogue of the expression of asking
and responding to compliment from the handout.
T helps them to understand the get the main
idea.
Two students read the dialogue for the whole
class.
T helps them to understand the dialogue deeper.
T shows some pictures and Ss confirm about
what they see
Ss make an expression of giving and responding
to compliment using the clues provided.
70’
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
134
Activity Description Time
Allocation
Ss practice using expression of giving and
responding to a compliment using card games
Closing Ss review the learning activities they have done
T tells the follow-up activity for today’s lesson
10’
Meeting 2
Activity Description Time
Allocation
Opening Ss respond the greetings from the teacher and
pray together.
T reviews the previous material.
5’
Main Observing
T asks the Ss to imagine if their best friend gets
100 in English test, they see a beautiful scenery,
etc.
Ss show the expressions
T and Ss identify how to make expression of
giving and responding to compliment using
“how” and “what”(for the review)
Association
Ss compare two cultures (Indonesian and
Western) in responding to a compliment.
Ss recognize when compliment should be given.
Communication
Ss read the dialogue provided.
Two students read the dialogue.
T asks some comprehension questions to know
the understanding of the students
Ss are divided into two groups.
Ss read the dialogue.
T distributes the communication card and asks
the students to make dialogue.
Ss make the dialogue and perform it in front of
the class.
65’
Closing Ss do the written test
Ss summarize the material they have done
20’
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
135
I. Assessment
Indicators of
Achievement Technique Instrument
Showing the attitude of
politeness in having
conversation and doing
group or individual
activities
Role play by playing card
game
Assessment Sheet and
Rubric
Showing the attitude of
enthusiasm in having
conversation and doing
group or individual
activities
Role play by playing card
game
Assessment Sheet and
Rubric
Applying the expression
of giving and responding
to compliment in the
class activities
Performance test Assessment Sheet and
Rubric
Technique : Oral Test
Form : Role Play and Student’s Performance
Instrument :
a. Rubric
No Aspect Score Note
1 Task
1 Minimal attempt to complete the task and/or responses
frequently inappropriate.
2 Partial completion of the task yet needs help in handling any
complication or difficulties.
3 Partial completion of the task, responses mostly appropriate
yet undeveloped.
4 Completion of the task responses appropriately and
adequately developed.
5 Completion of the task perfectly, responds with elaboration.
2 Pronuncia
tion
1 Frequent errors, little or no communication.
2 Some mispronunciations and a very heavy accent make
understanding difficult, require frequent repetition.
3 Mispronunciations do not interfere with understanding, show
the “foreign accent”
4 Errors in pronunciation are quite rare.
5 No conspicuous mispronunciations.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
136
No Aspect Score Note
3 Grammar
1 Frequent inadequate and/or inaccurate use of basic language
structure.
2 Producing constant errors frequently that shows uncontrolled
of using major patterns.
3 Producing constant errors that cause misunderstanding.
4 Producing some errors but it can be understood.
5 Control of grammar is good. Few errors, with no pattern of
failure.
4 Fluency
1 Speech is so halting with long pauses and/or incomplete
thoughts.
2 Speech is very slow and/or with frequent pauses, few and no
incomplete thoughts for short or routine sentences.
3 Speech is frequently hesitant; can manage to continue and
complete the idea.
4 Speech is occasionally hesitant, with some unevenness caused
by rephrasing and groping for words.
5 Speech is almost fluent, effortless and smooth, but perceptibly
non-native in speech and evenness.
5. Polite-
ness
1 Showing uncooperative and irresponsible attitude, less
interaction and respect for others, not giving any respond.
2 Occasionally showing cooperation and respect for others,
sometimes giving the respond.
3 Showing cooperation and respect for others, always giving the
respond, but it requires motivation from the teacher.
4 Demonstrating respect most of the time, having good
interaction with the other students.
5 Always showing respect for others (both to the teacher and
classmates) and responsibility; can work well with everyone.
6 Enthu-
siasm 1 Consistently showing little or no effort; passive all the time.
2 Not putting forth an effort to be able to speak well; passive
most of the time.
3
Occasionally showing the effort to be able to speak well and
having acceptable demonstration of willingness to perform to
the best of his/her ability.
4
Having good demonstration of willingness to perform to the
best of his/her ability; occasionally working at a challenging
level.
5
Having excellent demonstration of willingness to perform to
the best of his/her ability; almost working at a challenging
level.
(Taken from: Sample Assessment Tools, page 4 and 30; A Collection of
Performance Task and Rubrics: Foreign Languages, page 39; Brown (2004, pp.
172-173; Hughes (1989, pp. 111-112) , elaborated by the researcher)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
137
Total Score : 100
Scoring :
(Task+Pronunciation+Grammar+Fluency+Politeness+Enthusiasm)x100
30
c. Assessment Sheet
No. Name Task Pronun-
ciation Grammar Fluency
Polite
-ness
Enthu
siasm
Final
Score
1 Gilang 2 Wahid 3 Allyza 4 Tia 5 Anik 6 Anisa 7 Dea 8 Desti 9 Dhimas 10 Dwi 11 Fany 12 Galus 13 Indri 14 Intan 15 Ira 16 Klemens 17 Lisa 18 Maria 19 Okta 20 Nony 21 Nada 22 Pita 23 Ilyas 24 Ria 25 Luthfi 26 Rara 27 Galuh 28 Ningsih 29 Fadilah 30 Siti 31 Sulis 32 Tasyaa
Depok, …… August 2014
Verified by, Designed by,
Main teacher Researcher,
Heri Afrahatu Rahmah, S.Pd Paulina Besty Fortinasari
NIP. 196810132007012009 NIM. 101214089
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
138
How to Play Compliment Cue-Card
On the card, there are a picture and two words. The word which is above the
picture is adjective and the word which is below the picture is noun. Those picture
and words will be the clues for what you are going to say.
The steps are:
1. Make a circle consisting of 4 people.
2. Shuffle the cards.
3. Distribute the cards until each member gets 5 cards. Put the remaining card in
the centre.
4. Choose the one who will start giving compliment. He or she can give the
compliment to another member in the group. (ONLY TO ONE MEMBER)
5. When the students give and respond the compliment, they must use the
expression appropriately. Please remind the students to see the picture and
read the words. Those picture and words will be the clues for what the
students are going to say.
6. If the one who gets the compliment has the same card, he or she will receive a
card from the one who gives the compliment. If the one who gets the
compliment does not have the same card, he or she will not receive a card.
Meanwhile, the one who gives the compliment will take a new card in the
remaining cards in the center.
7. The game will finish when the remaining cards in the center finish.
8. The winner is the one who can collect the twin cards the most.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
139
HANDOUT Giving and Responding to a Compliment
Exclamation!!
How Adj/Adv Subject Verb
How Big it is!
How Quickly he run!
Expression Response
Excellent! You really did it well.
That’s nice. I really like it.
It was great.
Well done.
Wow! Awesome!
Good job!
You look great today.
How cold it is!
How beautifully she sings!
What a wonderful design!
What lovely flowers!
What a beautiful smile you have!
Thank you.
Thanks. You’ve made my day.
It’s kind of you to say that.
Do you really think so?
Thanks. I needed that.
It’s a nice word.
What a/an Adj
Singular
Countable
Noun
Subject Verb
What A Nice house It is!
What A beautiful smile She has!
What Adj Uncountable or
plural noun Subject Verb
What lovely weather It is!
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
140
Dialogue 1
Sari : Hi, I am glad you could make it. You’re the first one here. Make yourself
comfortable.
Agung : Thanks and you look great. Red looks great on you.
Sari : Oh, thanks. It’s nice to be out of school uniform. Can I get you something
to drink?
Agung : Sure. What do you have?
Sari : I have some cans of drinks. Want one?
Agung : Sure. What a cool place! This is a
really nice house.
Sari : Here you go. Actually, my family just
moved in last month and my father is
still decorating. But, that’s nice of you to say.
Agung : Wow, nice picture. Did you paint this?
Sari : No, I didn’t. We bought it in Bali. It’s just a copy. You know, I really
appreciate the compliments, but what’s up?
Agung : Up? Nothing. I’m glad to be here.
Sari : Sure. Cheers!
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
141
CUE CARDS FOR CARD GAME
sw imming pool
[large ]
boss
[arrogant]
boy
[brave]
teacher
[energetic]
girl
[beautiful] [professional]
singer
people
[friendly] [careful]
driver
[big]
building
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
142
[talented]
musician garden
[amazing] [great]
competition
secretary
[busy]
bedroom
[tidy] [smart]
robot
[patient]
nurse farmer
[successful]
hotel
[luxurious]
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
143
writer
[awesome] [hardworking]
employer
[cold]
water
lake
[wonderful]
house
[nice]
doctor
[passionate]
shoes
[unique]
jacket
[expensive] [cool]
car
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
144
COMMUNICATION CARDS
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
145
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
146
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
147
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
148
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
149
Appendix 4
Lesson Plan and Teaching Instrument
of Cycle Three
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
150
LESSON PLAN
Name of School : SMK Negeri 2 Depok Sleman
Subject : English
Grade/Semester : X/1
Topic : Expression of plans and intentions
Meeting : 2 meetings
Time Allocation : 2 x 45 minutes
A. Inner Competence
1. Experiencing and applying the values of the religion.
2. Experiencing and applying the values of honesty, responsibility,
discipline, care, cooperation, peacefulness, politeness, liveliness, and
tolerance; showing the attitude as the part of solutions in the daily
interactive communication and placing themselves as the reflection of
nationality.
3. Understanding, applying, and analyzing the factual, conceptual and
procedural knowledge based on the curiosity of science, technology, art,
culture and humanities by the concept of humanism, nationalism and
civilization related to the cause of phenomena; applying procedural
knowledge on the specific subject suitable with the interest in solving
problems.
4. Processing, reasoning and showing the concrete and abstract things related
to the development from the learning and teaching process independently
using the scientific methods.
B. Basic Competence
1. Being grateful to God for the chance to study English which is as the
International communication means by showing the spirit.
2. Showing honesty, discipline, confidence, and high-responsibility in doing
transactional conversation with the teacher and friends.
3. Analyzing the social function, grammatical and linguistic of the expression
of plans and intentions in the daily conversation
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
151
Indicators :
a. Students are able to identify the expressions of plans and intentions
b. Students are able to differentiate the use of “be going to” and “will” in
the expressions of plans and intentions
4. Arranging the dialogue about expression of plans and intentions based on
the correct social function, grammatical and linguistic in the daily
conversation.
Indicator:
Students are able to use on how to express plans and intentions with great
enthusiasm.
C. Learning Objectives
At the end of this activity, the students are able to apply the expression of
plans and intentions the daily life communication by showing honesty,
confidence, discipline and responsibility.
D. Material
1. Function : Plans and intentions
2. The structure of the text :
S + to be going to + V1
S + will + V1
3. Linguistic :
“Be going to” is used:
a. To express future decision or plan made before the moment of
speaking.
Examples : I am going to go to London next Desember.
We are going to visit our grandparents next week.
b. To express that something certainly happen in the future
Examples : Look at those clouds! It is going to rain.
Watch out! The box is going to fall.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
152
“Will” is used:
a. To express a voluntary action (we do something for someone)
Examples : I will send you the information when I get it.
I will help you move this table.
b. To express a promise
Examples : I will call you when I arrive
Don’t worry I will be careful
c. To express a prediction
Examples : I think she will not come.
They think we will win this competition.
E. Learning Method
1. Approach : Scientific Approach
2. Model : Discovery Learning
3. Technique : Role Play
F. Teaching Media and Source
1. Media : Cue cards, Video, PowerPoint, Handout
2. Equipment : Laptop, White/Black Board, Speaker
3. Source :
Hadfield, J. (1984). Elementary communication game. Essex: Longman
Lande, Shyla K. (2014). Forward for vocational school grade x. Jakarta:
Erlangga.
Pramesti, M. R. (2008). English for smk grade 1 - bse. Jakarta: Pusat
Perbukuan Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Richards, J.C. (2005). Interchange: teacher’s resource book 1. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press
Widyati, Utami. (2014). bahasa inggris (buku siswa). Jakarta: Pusat
Kurikulum dan Perbukuan, Balitbang Kemdikbud.
G. Learning Activity
Meeting 1
Activity Description Time
Allocation
Opening Ss respond the greetings from the teacher and
pray together.
10’
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
153
Activity Description Time
Allocation
T reviews the previous meeting.
Ss try to find out the material and learning goals
of today’s lesson from the teacher.
Ss accept the motivations to achieve the goals.
Main Observing
T asks the Ss about what they are going to do on
Saturday night
Ss write down their idea in front of the class
T and Ss identify the characteristic of be going
to and will
Questioning
T distributes the handout
Ss read the handout
T and Ss discuss the handout
Ss ask the questions related the expression plans
and intentions
Exploration
Ss listen to the recordings (5 words)
Ss take a note about the words they listen to
Ss write the words with the correct spelling on
the white board
Ss repeat the words with the correct
pronunciation and intonation
Ss listen to the recordings (5 sentences)
Ss take a note about the sentences they listen to
Ss write the sentences on the white board
Ss repeat the words with the correct
pronunciation and intonation
T asks the Ss students to do exercise 1
Ss confirm what they have to do
Ss listen to the recording while completing the
dialogue (max. 3 times)
Ss write the answer in front of the class
Ss read the dialogue loudly
70’
Closing Ss review the learning activities they have done
Teacher tells the students to study “be going to”
and “will” at home since next week there is
performance test and written test.
10’
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
154
Meeting 2
Activity Description Time
Allocation
Opening Ss respond the greetings from the teacher and pray
together.
T reviews the previous material.
5’
Main Observing
T asks the Ss to imagine what places they will visit
on next holiday.
Ss write down their idea in front of the class
T and Ss identify how to use be going to and will
(for the review)
Exploration
Ss look at the picture on the slide
Ss make the future tense sentences using the clue
provided and write on the white board.
Ss and T check together the written sentences.
T tells that today there will be card game. T
explains the rules
Ss look at words on the slide and ask whether there
are some difficulty words.
Ss practice making expression of plans and
intentions by playing card games
Association
Ss find the conclusion of playing card game,
especially on how to show our plans.
Communication
Ss read the dialogue provided.
Two students read the dialogue.
T asks some comprehension questions to know the
understanding of the students
Ss are divided into two groups.
Ss read the dialogue.
T distributes the communication card and asks the
students to make dialogue.
Ss make the dialogue and perform it in front of the
class.
70’
Closing Ss do the written test
Ss review the learning activities they have done
10’
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
155
H. Assessment
Indicators of
Achievement
Technique Instrument
Showing the attitude of
politeness in having
conversation and doing
group or individual
activities
Role play by playing card
game
Assessment Sheet and
Rubric
Showing the attitude of
enthusiasm in having
conversation and doing
group or individual
activities
Role play by playing card
game
Assessment Sheet and
Rubric
Applying the expression
of plans and intentions in
the class activities
Performance test Assessment Sheet and
Rubric
Understanding the
expression of plans and
intentions
Written test Assessment sheet and
answer key
Technique : Oral Test
Form : Role Play and Student’s Performance
Instrument :
a. Rubric
No Aspect Score Note
1 Task
1 Minimal attempt to complete the task and/or responses
frequently inappropriate.
2 Partial completion of the task yet needs help in handling
any complication or difficulties.
3 Partial completion of the task, responses mostly
appropriate yet undeveloped.
4 Completion of the task responses appropriately and
adequately developed.
5 Completion of the task perfectly, responds with
elaboration.
2 Pronun-
ciation
1 Frequent errors, little or no communication.
2 Some mispronunciations and a very heavy accent make
understanding difficult, require frequent repetition.
3 Mispronunciations do not interfere with understanding,
show the “foreign accent”
4 Errors in pronunciation are quite rare.
5 No conspicuous mispronunciations.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
156
No Aspect Score Note
3 Grammar
1 Frequent inadequate and/or inaccurate use of basic
language structure.
2 Producing constant errors frequently that shows
uncontrolled of using major patterns.
3 Producing constant errors that cause misunderstanding.
4 Producing some errors but it can be understood.
5 Control of grammar is good. Few errors, with no pattern
of failure.
4 Fluency
1 Speech is so halting with long pauses and/or incomplete
thoughts.
2 Speech is very slow and/or with frequent pauses, few and
no incomplete thoughts for short or routine sentences.
3 Speech is frequently hesitant; can manage to continue and
complete the idea.
4 Speech is occasionally hesitant, with some unevenness
caused by rephrasing and groping for words.
5 Speech is almost fluent, effortless and smooth, but
perceptibly non-native in speech and evenness.
5. Politeness
1 Showing uncooperative and irresponsible attitude, less
interaction and respect for others, not giving any respond.
2 Occasionally showing cooperation and respect for others,
sometimes giving the respond.
3 Showing cooperation and respect for others, always giving
the respond, but it requires motivation from the teacher.
4 Demonstrating respect most of the time, having good
interaction with the other students.
5
Always showing respect for others (both to the teacher
and classmates) and responsibility; can work well with
everyone.
6 Enthu-
siasm
1 Consistently showing little or no effort; passive all the
time.
2 Not putting forth an effort to be able to speak well;
passive most of the time.
3
Occasionally showing the effort to be able to speak well
and having acceptable demonstration of willingness to
perform to the best of his/her ability.
4
Having good demonstration of willingness to perform to
the best of his/her ability; occasionally working at a
challenging level.
5
Having excellent demonstration of willingness to perform
to the best of his/her ability; almost working at a
challenging level.
(Taken from: Sample Assessment Tools, page 4 and 30; A Collection of
Performance Task and Rubrics: Foreign Languages, page 39; Brown (2004, pp.
172-173; Hughes (1989, pp. 111-112) , elaborated by the researcher)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
157
Total Score : 100
Scoring :
(Task+Pronun+Grammar+Fluency+Politeness+Enthusiasm+Review test)x100
40
b. Answer Key
1. will turn
2. will attend
3. will help
4. are going to go
5. will give
6. are going to visit
7. will give
8. will give
9. is going to have
10. will work
c. Assessment Sheet
No. Name Task Pronun
ciation Grammar Fluency
Polite
-ness
Enthu
-siasm
Review
test
Final
Score
1 Gilang
2 Wahid
3 Allyza
4 Tia
5 Anik
6 Anisa
7 Dea
8 Desti
9 Dhimas
10 Dwi
11 Fany
12 Galus
13 Indri
14 Intan
15 Ira
16 Klemens
17 Lisa
18 Maria
19 Okta
20 Nony
21 Nada
22 Pita
23 Ilyas
24 Ria
25 Luthfi
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
158
No. Name Task Pronun
ciation Grammar Fluency
Polite
-ness
Enthu
-siasm
Review
test
Final
Score
26 Rara
27 Galuh
28 Ningsih
29 Fadilah
30 Siti
31 Sulis
32 Tasyaa
Depok, …… September 2014
Verified by, Designed by,
Main teacher Researcher,
Heri Afrahatu Rahmah, S.Pd Paulina Besty Fortinasari
NIP. 196810132007012009 NIM. 101214089
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
159
Review Test
Complete the following sentences using the correct form of “will” or “be going
to”!
1. Person A : I can’t hear the television!
Person B : I (1. turn) ________________ it up so you can hear it.
2. After I graduated, I (2. attend) _______________chemical industry and
become an engineer. I want to be an engineer for all my life.
3. Guest : Excuse me, I need to talk to someone about our hotel
room. It is too small for four people.
Receptionist : The man at the desk (3. help) _____________you.
4. Jhony : We (4. go) ___________swimming this weekend. Would
you like to come along?
Haga : That sounds great, but I don’t have a bathing suit.
Jhony : No problem. I (5. give) ________________ you one. I
have some.
5. Mark : Fred and I (6. visit) ______________ Ambon next year.
Have you ever been there?
Peter : My family lives in Ambon. I (7. give) ________________
you my parents’ phone number. When you get there, just call them and they
(8. give) ________________ you a little tour of the city.
6. Aliya : She (9. have) _____________interview in Mayora
tomorrow.
Dena : Is she in Jakarta?
Aliya : Yes, but perhaps she (10. work) _________________ in
another city.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
160
Handout
Expression of Plans and Intentions
I am going to ……
He is going to …..
I will …….
She will ……
Future tense using “be going to” and “will”
1. Future tense with “be going to”
I am
am not
going to eat meat
ball tomorrow
He
She
It
is
is not
We
You
They
are
aren’t
When
Am I
going to eat meat ball?
Is
He
she
it
Are
You
they
we
“Be going to” is used :
c. To express future decision or plan made before the moment of speaking.
Examples : I am going to go to London next Desember.
We are going to visit our grandparents next week.
d. To express that something certainly happen in the future
Examples : Look at those clouds! It is going to rain.
Watch out! The box is going to fall.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
161
2. Future tense with “will”
I
will
will not
(won’t)
eat meat ball in the canteen.
He
She
It
We
You
They
Where will
I
eat meat ball?
He
she
it
You
they
we
“Will” is used :
d. To express a voluntary action (we do something for someone)
Examples : I will send you the information when I get it.
I will help you move this table.
e. To express a promise
Examples : I will call you when I arrive
Don’t worry I will be careful
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
162
Exercise 1
A. Listen and complete the following dialog with the phrases/sentences in the
box.
Person A : __________________ anything this evening?
Person B : Yes, _________________ to the cinema.
Person A : What movie ______________ to watch?
Person B : Pirates of the Caribbean.
Person A : What time does it start?
Person B : 7:30 PM
Person A : What _______________ after that?
Person B : _____________________ dinner with Donna.
Person A : What are you doing at the weekend?
Person B : I’m not sure. _____________ swimming?
Person A : Where _____________?
Person B : I expect ______________________ the Olympiad
Swimming Pool.
I’m going Are you doing Are you going to
Are you going to do I’ll go to I’ll probably go
Do you think you will go I’m having
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
163
How to Play Card Game for Expression of Plans and Intensions
On the card, there are a picture and two words. The word which is above the
picture is verb, and the word which is below the picture is noun. The picture and
those words will be the clues for what the students are going to say.
The steps are:
1. Make a circle consisting of 4 students.
2. Shuffle the cards.
3. Distribute the cards until each member gets 5 cards. Put the remaining card in
the centre.
4. Choose the one who will start asking plans and intentions. The player may
only ask to one student. For example, if there are A, B, C, and D, A can ask a
plan or intention to B, C OR D only.
5. When the students ask plans and intentions, the students must use the
expression of plans and intentions appropriately. Before the students ask,
please remind them to see the picture and read the words. Those picture and
words will be the clues to make a good expression.
6. The one who is asked plans and intentions, he/she should accept or refuse the
request depends on the cards that he/she has. If he/she has, he/she must accept
the request and give the card. If he/she does not have, he/she must refuse the
request and let the player to take the card in the centre. The responds should
be given in the complete sentence of future tense.
The example of asking and responding in the future tense:
A : Are you going to buy jacket?
B : Yes. I am going to buy jacket.
A : Will you open the window?
B : No. I will not open the window.
7. The winner is the one who can collect the twin cards the most.
8. The game will finish when the cards has been finish and each card has found
its twin.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
164
CUE CARDS FOR CARD GAME
painting
(show)
carburetor
(fix)
chain
(repair)
truck
(drive)
schedule
(arrange) (clean)
bedroom
cup of tea
(make)
house
(build) (paint)
wall
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
165
(draw)
face guitar
(play)
instant noodle
(cook)
robot
(create) (throw)
rubbish
(polish)
table
helmet
(wear) (help)
old womandigital camera
(operate)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
166
wood table
(move) (charge)
battery
(cut)
onion
(sing)
Indonesia Raya air conditioner
(turn on)
Mr. Obama
(interview)
(finish)
project
(cook)
chinese food
(pull)
rope
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
167
apple
(wash)
(send)
ball
(kick)
letter
(write)
(rinse)
cloth
(grind)
coffee
(publish)
product
(refine)
oil
(mill)
pepper
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
168
(steam)
vegetable
(soak)
Kidney bean
(boil)
potatoes
(pour)
honey
(heat)
broth
(freeze)
yogurt
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
169
COMMUNICATION CARDS
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
170
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
171
Appendix 5
Blue Print of Questionnaire
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
172
Blue print of Questionnaire
Part A
Aspect Statements Underlined Theory Number
Students’
personal
reflection of
their
achievement
Cue cards improve
my English
speaking ability.
Mora (1994) states that cue cards
can help the students to improve the
speaking and writing ability.
1
Cue cards give me
the idea of what I
am going to say.
Boyd (2007) states cue cards are
tools “used to help the patient
restructure thought patterns” (p.
421). Cue cards allow the speaker
to predict what other speakers say
so that he/she can prepare his/her
own responses.
2
I can speak more
fluently after
learning English
using cue cards.
Littlewood (1981, p. 51) proposes
that cue cards can be used to study
fluency in speaking because it
supplies the idea for the speaker to
speak spontaneously.
3
I can speak more
confidently after
learning English
using cue cards
Briggs (1977, p.xv) defines cue is
an indirect prompt given to help a
learner complete a recitation or
solve a problem. It can also be
defined as an indirect form of
“guidance” stopping short of
supplying the missing word or
solution.
4
I can speak
naturally after
learning English
using cue cards
Littlewood (1981) states that cue
cards give the interaction some of
the uncertainty and spontaneity
involved in “real” communication
(p. 51).
5
I can speak
spontaneously after
learning English
using cue cards.
Littlewood (1981, p. 51) proposes
that cue cards can be used to study
fluency in speaking because it
supplies the idea for the speaker to
speak spontaneously.
6
Students’
perception
on the use of
cue cards
I am happy to study
English speaking
using cue cards.
Sayer (2005) states using cue cards
in some speaking techniques like
role-plays and diagram is a good
combination of techniques to help
the students practice speaking.
7
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
173
Aspect Statements Underlined Theory Number
Cue cards in
teaching and
learning English is
attractive.
Harmer (2007, pp.178-179)
proposes that cue cards can be used
in a multiplicity of ways, for
examples, for drilling,
communication games, prediction,
understanding, ornamentation and
discussion.
8
Cue cards motivate
me to participate
more actively in
the teaching-
learning activities.
Bailey (2003) states one of the
principles of teaching speaking is
providing opportunities for
students to talk by using group
work or pair work, and limiting
teacher talk.
9
Using cue cards in
teaching and
learning English is
very useful.
Littlewood (1981) agrees that cue
cards can be used in teaching
speaking. 10
Part B
Aspect Statements Number
Students’ personal
opinion to the use of
cue cards as the
teaching media
Bagaimana pendapatmu tentang penggunaan
cue cards dalam pelajaran Bahasa Inggris? 1
Apa yang kamu rasakan sesudah bermain
card game menggunakan cue cards? 2
Apa yang kamu rasakan saat melakukan
percakapan di depan kelas menggunakan
cue cards?
3
The development of cue
cards
Apakah kekurangan dan/atau kelebihan dari
penggunaan cue cards dalam meningkatkan
ketrampilan berbicara dalam Bahasa
Inggris?
4
Hal apakah yang masih perlu ditingkatkan
dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris hari ini?
Apa saran yang ingin kamu sampaikan
untuk meningkatkan hal tersebut?
5
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
174
Appendix 6
Sample of Questionnaire
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
175
KUESIONER
A. Berdasarkan pengalamanmu, berikan tanda centang () pada kolom
yang tersedia!
No Pernyataan
Sangat
Tidak
Setuju
Tidak
Setuju Setuju
Sangat
Setuju
1. Ketrampilan berbicara saya
meningkat setelah belajar
Bahasa Inggris menggunakan
cue cards
2. Cue cards membantu saya
menyusun ide-ide yang akan
saya ungkapkan
3. Penggunaan cue cards
membantu saya berbicara
Bahasa Inggris dengan lancar
4. Penggunaan cue cards membuat
saya lebih percaya diri dalam
berbicara Bahasa Inggris
5. Cue cards membantu saya
berbicara Bahasa Inggris secara
natural
6. Cue cards membantu saya untuk
berbicara Bahasa Inggris secara
spontan
7. Saya suka belajar Bahasa
Inggris dengan cue cards
8. Penggunaan cue cards dalam
pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris
menarik
9. Belajar menggunakan cue cards
memotivasi saya untuk aktif
dalam kegiatan pembelajaran di
kelas
10. Penggunaan cue cards dalam
pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris
bermanfaat
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
176
B. Jawablah pertanyaan di bawah ini sesuai dengan pengalamanmu!
1. Bagaimana pendapatmu tentang penggunaan cue cards dalam pelajaran
Bahasa Inggris?
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
2. Apa yang kamu rasakan sesudah bermain card game menggunakan cue
cards?
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
3. Apa yang kamu rasakan saat melakukan percakapan di depan kelas
menggunakan cue cards?
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
4. Apakah kekurangan dan/atau kelebihan dari penggunaan cue cards dalam
meningkatkan ketrampilan berbicara dalam Bahasa Inggris?
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
5. Hal apakah yang masih perlu ditingkatkan dalam pembelajaran Bahasa
Inggris hari ini? Apa saran yang ingin kamu sampaikan untuk meningkatkan
hal tersebut?
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
177
Appendix 7
Raw Data of Questionnaire
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
178
RAW DATA OF QUESTIONNAIRE
CYCLE 1
PART A
No Statements
∑
Strongly
Disagree
(1)
Disagree
(2)
Agree
(3)
Strongly
Agree
(4)
1. Cue cards improve my
English speaking ability.
0
(0.00%)
2
(7.40%)
21
(77.77%)
4
(14.81%)
2. Cue cards give me the idea of
what I am going to say.
0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
19
(70.37%)
8
(29.6%)
3. I can speak more fluently
after learning English using
cue cards.
0
(0.00%)
2
(7.40%)
21
(77.77% )
4
(14.81%)
4. I can speak more confidently
after learning English using
cue cards
0
(0.00%)
2
(7.40%)
21
(77.77%)
4
(14.81%)
5. I can speak naturally after
learning English using cue
cards
0
(0.00%)
1
(3.70%)
21
(77.77%)
5
(18.52%)
6. I can speak spontaneously
after learning English using
cue cards.
0
(0.00%)
4
(14.81%)
16
(59.25%)
7
(25.93%)
7. I am happy to study English
speaking using cue cards.
0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
20
(74.07%)
7
(25.93%)
8. Cue cards in teaching and
learning English is attractive.
0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
24
(88.88%)
3
(11.11%)
9. Cue cards motivate me to
participate more actively in
the teaching-learning
activities.
0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
18
(66.66%)
9
(33.33%)
10. Using cue cards in teaching
and learning English is very
useful.
0
(0.00%)
1
(3.70%)
18
(66.66%)
8
(29.6%)
Total X 0 12 199 59
Total X Point 0 24 597 236
Total Points 857
Mean 31.74
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
179
PART B
1. What is your opinion about the use of cue cards in learning English
speaking skills?
- It is interesting. (7)
- I am very happy because it is very attractive and not boring (4)
- It is very useful to help me speak English with correct pronunciation(2)
- There is more student-student or student-students interaction
- It helps me understand the material more easily.(3)
- It gives me the ideas on what I am going to say(2)
- It helps me produce the expressions with the correct grammar(3)
- I can increase my vocabulary building(2)
- The use of cue cards is simple and it is easy to be understood.
2. What did you feel when you were playing card game using the cue cards?
- I felt happy because I could learn while playing.(5)
- I could feel that learning English was fun and not stressful.(2)
- In the beginning I did not understand what the cards were for, but after
playing card, I understood what the cards were for. I could understand the
material easily.
- Nothing.
- I felt happy but I was disappointed. I couldn’t win the game. (2)
- I could understand more easily(3)
- It did not make me bored and sleepy(2)
- I could practice speaking English more(2)
- It was easier to arrange the sentences because I have repeated for many
times(6)
- I felt more confident to speak in English because there were many friends
who also tried to speak in English (9)
- I felt my ability to speak in English was getting better.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
180
3. What are the strengths and the weaknesses of using cue cards in improving
your English speaking ability?
- Weaknessess :
o I still need extra time to memorize the meaning of the new words.
o The explanation of the rules of the game is quite confusing.
o Some new words are not familiar. (2)
o I do not know how to pronounce some words correctly.
o There are only a few new words. (2)
o The size of cue cards is too small to hold. (2)
o The verbs are so familiar.
o There is no weaknesses.(4)
- Strengths :
o I can speak in English more fluently.(3)
o The English lesson become more attractive and it does not make
me bored or sleepy(10)
o I can speak in English spontaneously(5)
o I can speak in English more
o I can enjoy my English class. It motivates me not to be lazy to
study English(5)
o I can understand the material more easily and faster(2)
o The picture and the words are clear and interesting.
4. What is your suggestion about the use of cue cards today? Is there anything
that should be improved?
- It has been good.(10)
- It’s better to add more new vocabulary.
- The size of the cards should be bigger.
- The teacher should pay more attention on pronunciation and intonation of
the students.
- It is better to have this game every day.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
181
RAW DATA OF QUESTIONNAIRE
CYCLE 2
PART A
No Statements
`∑
Strongly
Disagree Disagree Agree
Strongl
y
Agree
1 Cue cards improve my
English speaking ability.
0
(0.00%)
1
(3.26%)
22
(70.97%)
8
(25.80
%)
2
Cue cards give me the idea of
what I am going to say. 0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
19
(61.30%)
12
(38.71
%)
3
I can speak more fluently
after learning English using
cue cards.
0
(0.00%)
1
(3.26%)
18
(58.06%)
12
(38.71
%)
4
I can speak more confidently
after learning English using
cue cards
0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
20
(64.52%)
11
(35.49
%)
5
I can speak spontaneously
after learning English using
cue cards.
0
(0.00%)
2
(6.45%)
20
(64.52%)
9
(29.03
%)
6
I can speak naturally after
learning English using cue
cards
0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
24
(77.42%)
7
(22.58
%)
7
I am happy to study English
speaking using cue cards. 0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
15
(48.39%)
16
(51.61
%)
8
Cue cards in teaching and
learning English is attractive. 0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
17
(54.80%)
14
(45.16
%)
9
Cue cards motivate me to
participate more actively in
the teaching-learning
activities.
0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
21
(67.74%)
10
(32.26
%)
10 Cue cards in teaching and
learning English is very
useful.
0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
16
(51.62%)
15
(48.38
%)
Total X 0 15 202 94
Total X Point 0 30 606 376
Total Points 1012
Mean 32.65
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
182
PART B
1. What is your opinion about the use of cue cards in learning English speaking
skills?
- It is fun and very interesting. (6)
- I am very happy because it does not make me bored.(3)
- It is very useful to help me speak English with correct pronunciation.(3)
- I become closer to the other friends.
- It helps me to understand the material more easily and faster.(3)
- It gives me the ideas on what I am going to say(2)
- It helps me to produce the expressions with the correct grammar.(2)
- My vocabulary in English is richer.(3)
- The use of cue cards is simple and it can be understood easily.
- It helps me to recall the ideas when I forget the words that I have to say.
- I can perform a dialogue with my close friend without writing the script
and too much memorization.(4)
2. What did you feel when you were playing card game using the cue cards?
- I felt happy because I could learn while playing.(6)
- I didn’t feel stressful although it was the first time I studied expression of
compliment.(5)
- Playing cards with friends was fun. We could learn by playing.(3)
- I could understand the material faster.(5)
- I felt my ability to speak in English was getting better.
- I was not happy. I couldn’t win the game.(3)
3. What did you feel when you were having dialogue with your friends in front
of the class?
- In the beginning, I was afraid of making mistakes, but cue cards helped
me to supply the words that I was going to say.(3)
- Nothing.
- It was fun. It force me to speak in front of the class.(3)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
183
- I felt more confidence to practice speaking. (4)
- I confused to express my idea.
4. What are the strengths and the weaknesses of using cue cards in improving
your English speaking ability?
- Weaknessess :
o Some new words are not familiar. (2)
o I still need extra time to memorize the pronunciation of some new
words
o There is no weaknesses.(7)
o The time allocation to play card games and perform the dialogue
is too short. (6)
- Strengths :
o I can speak in English more fluently.(5)
o The English lesson become more attractive and it does not make
me bored or sleepy.(3)
o There is variation in playing the cards. (2)
o I can speak in English spontaneously.(6)
o The activities make me more close to the other friends.(2)
o I can directly practice speaking English.(2)
o The picture and the words give clear imagination about it.(2)
5. What is your suggestion about the use of cue cards today? Is there anything
that should be improved?
- It has already been good.(10)
- The teacher should pay more attention on pronunciation and intonation of
the students.
- There are presents for the winner.(2)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
184
RAW DATA OF QUESTIONNAIRE
CYCLE 3
PART A
No Statements
∑
Strongly
Disagree Disagree Agree
Strongly
Agree
1. Cue cards improve my
English speaking ability.
0
(0.00%)
1
(3.12%)
20
(62.5%)
10
(31.25%)
2. Cue cards give me the idea
of what I am going to say.
0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
20
(62.5%)
12
(37.5%)
3. I can speak more fluently
after learning English using
cue cards.
0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
19
(59.38%)
13
(40.62%)
4. I can speak more confidently
after learning English using
cue cards
0
(0.00%)
2
(6,25%)
21
(65,6%)
9
(28,12%)
5. I can speak naturally after
learning English using cue
cards
0
(0.00%)
1
(3.12%)
21
(65,6%)
10
(31.25%)
6. I can speak spontaneously
after learning English using
cue cards.
0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
22
(68,75%)
10
(31.25%)
7. I am happy to study English
speaking using cue cards.
0
(0.00%)
1
(3.12%)
17
(53,13%)
14
(43,75%)
8. Cue cards in teaching and
learning English is
attractive.
0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
17
(53,13%)
15
(46,87%)
9. Cue cards motivate me to
participate more actively in
the teaching-learning
activities.
0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
19
(59.38%)
13
(3.12%)
10. Cue cards in teaching and
learning English is very
useful.
0
(0.00%)
0
(0.00%)
15
(46.87%)
17
(53.13%)
Total X 0 5 191 125
Total X Point 0 10 573 500
Total Points 1093
Mean 34.15
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
185
PART B
1. What is your opinion about the use of cue cards in learning English speaking
skills?
- It gives me the ideas on what I am going to say(2)
- It is still fun and very interesting. it does not make me bored and sleepy in
the class (6)
- It helps me to understand the material more easily and faster.(3)
- It helps me to produce the expressions with the correct grammar.(4)
- The use of cue cards is simple and it can be understood easily.
- It helps me to recall the ideas when I forget the words that I have to say.
- I can perform a dialogue with my close friend without writing the script
and too much memorization.(8)
2. What did you feel when you were playing card game using the cue cards?
- I felt happy because I could learn by playing.(6)
- Playing cards with friends was fun. We could learn by playing.(3)
- I could understand the material faster.(3)
- I could practice speaking English more.(2)
- I felt my ability to speak in English was getting better.
- It was easier to arrange the sentences because I have repeated for many
times.(6)
- I felt more confident to speak in English because there were many friends
who also tried to speak in English.(7)
3. What did you feel when you were having dialogue with your friends in front
of the class?
- In the beginning, I was afraid of making mistakes, but cue cards helped
me to supply the words that I was going to say.(3)
- It was fun. It forced me to speak in front of the class.(5)
- I felt more confidence to practice speaking. (6)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
186
- I could speak fluently without writing the script or too much
memorization. (3)
4. What are the strengths and the weaknesses of using cue cards in improving
your English speaking ability?
- Weaknessess :
o There is no weaknesses.(3)
o The time allocation to prepare the dialogue is very short (7)
- Strengths :
o I can speak in English more fluently.(3)
o The English lesson become more attractive and it does not make
me bored or sleepy.(4)
o There is variation in playing the cards. (2)
o I can speak in English spontaneously.(4)
o I was forced to speak in English more than usual.(3)
o I can directly practice speaking English.(4)
o There is a picture to help me imagine what situation it is. (2)
5. What is your suggestion about the use of cue cards today? Is there anything
that should be improved?
- It has already been good.(12)
- It should be applied in other subjects.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
187
Appendix 9
The Interview Guide Used before
the Implementation of Cue Cards
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
188
1. Do you like studying English? Why?
2. Is English important for your future? Why?
3. Do you have any difficulty in studying English? Can you mention it?
4. Among 4 skills in English –speaking, listening, writing, and reading--,
which one is the most difficult? Why?
5. (If the students do not mention “speaking skill”) Do you think that
studying English speaking is difficult? Why?
6. How do you say in English:
a. Boleh saya ke toilet?
b. Bisa hidupkan ACnya?
c. Tidak apa-apa kan kalau saya parkir mobil di sini?
d. Boleh pinjam kameramu?
e. Bisa matikan kompornya?
f. Bisa pinjam pensilmu?
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
189
Appendix 11
The Summary of Interview Conducted
before the Implementation of Cue Cards
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
190
The Summary of Interview Conducted before the Implementation
of Cue Cards
Point of the questions Student’s answers
The reason why they
study English
Learning English is fun and cool.
Learning English is challenging because sometimes
what we pronounce is different from what we write.
The students want to study abroad in English speaking
countries.
The students want to pass the National Examination
well.
The students’
perception about
acquiring English skills
related to their future
Acquiring English skills is very important for their
future lives because English has become international
means of communication.
Acquiring English is important to get better job.
English is one of subjects that include in National
Examination.
By acquiring English skills, the students expect to be
able to take parts in the global era community with
adequate competence in English.
The difficulties faced
by the students during
studying English
Students still do not understand about S-V agreements
in English.
Students do not have enough vocabulary to speak in
English
Students do not master verb 1, verb 2 and verb 3
Speaking in complete sentences is hard.
The most difficult
English skills
Two students admit that listening is the most difficult
skill
Three students admit that speaking is the most difficult
skill
Four students admit that listening and speaking are the
most difficult skills
One student admits that writing is the most difficult
skill
The reason why that
skill is difficult
The students are not confident on their pronunciation.
The students do not have any idea how to respond in a
conversation.
The students have very limited English vocabulary.
They do not have enough time to practice listening and
speaking. They rarely listen to English conversation so
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
191
Point of the questions Student’s answers
it is difficult for them to catch the words during the
listening task. Their time to practice speaking in the
class or outside the class is also limited so the students
are never accustomed to speak in English.
Students are afraid of making mistakes in speaking.
They tend to be silent.
Students’ speaking
skills for daily
conversation
The students do not know how to express some
expressions for daily conversation.
For the first questions “how do say in English: Boleh
saya ke toilet?”, Three-tenths students can answer
correctly. Two-tenths students hesitate to answer, two-
tenths students give the wrong answer and the three-
tenths students do not answer anything.
For the second questions “how do say in English: Bisa
hidupkan ACnya?”, Four-tenths students can answer
correctly. One-tenth students hesitate to answer, Two-
tenths students give the wrong answer and the three-
tenths students do not answer anything.
For the three questions “how do say in English: Tidak
apa-apa kan kalau saya parkir mobil di sini?”, Nobody
can answer correctly. Three-tenths students hesitate to
answer, four-tenths students give the wrong answer and
the three-tenths students do not answer anything.
For the four questions “how do say in English: Boleh
pinjam kameramu?”, Four-tenths students can answer
correctly. Three-tenths students hesitate to answer, one-
tenths students give the wrong answer and the two-
tenths students do not answer anything.
For the five questions “how do say in English: Bisa
matikan kompornya?”, Four-tenths students can answer
correctly. Two-tenths students hesitate to answer, two-
tenths students give the wrong answer and the two-
tenths students do not answer anything.
For the seven questions “how do say in English: Bisa
ambil LCD di ruang guru?”, Three-tenths students can
answer correctly. Three-tenths students hesitate to
answer, one-tenths students give the wrong answer and
the three-tenths students do not answer anything.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
192
Appendix 10
The Interview Guide Used after
the Implementation of Cue Cards
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
193
INTERVIEW GUIDE
(for the students only in every cycle)
1. Do you understand the material of today?
2. Can you follow the activities?
3. In your opinion, how was the teaching and learning process in English lesson?
4. How do you feel when you are studying English by playing cue cards? Do you
feel happy? Why?
5. Do cue cards help you speak in English more confidently? Why?
6. Do cue cards help you speak in English more fluently? Why?
7. Are the words on the cue cards useful for daily conversation? Or are they only
used in the class?
8. Are there any cue cards which are unclear?
9. Is there any comment about the cards which are used today?
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
194
Appendix 11
The Summary of Interview Conducted
after the Implementation of Cue Cards
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
195
The Summary of Interview Conducted in Cycle One
Points of the Questions Students’ Answers
The students’ interest in
following the activities in
English class
The activities done in the class are fun and not stressful.
The students are not sleepy during the English class.
The activities done in the class do not make the students
feel bored.
The students’ perception
to the use of the cue cards The students are happy because they can directly practice
speaking in English.
Cue cards help them to understand the material deeper
and faster
The picture and the words on the cue cards give the idea
about what they are going to say
The students’ feeling
after playing card game The cue card game make the class not stressful
The students can understand the expression deeper
The students do not conscious that they are learning
speaking English by playing card game
Cue cards make the
students speak more
bravely
The students feel they are more confident when they are
playing cue cards. The students feel comfortable when
they can practice together with their close friends
The students get the idea about what they are going to
say from the picture and the words on the cards
The students feel more confident because they have tried
to speak the expressions for more than twice, so they
have been accustomed to speak English
Cue cards make the
students speak more
fluently
The students can speak more fluently because they have
tried to speak the expressions for more than twice, so
they have been accustomed to speak English
The students tried hard to speak in the spontaneous
because they are not allowed to write down the script.
The picture and the words give the idea on what they are
going to say. They can reduce the pauses.
The usefulness of the
words on the cue cards The students are more familiar on the words used in the
daily conversation
There are some new words that are useful to have daily
conversation
The difficulties still faced
by the students in
learning the Expression
of Asking and
Responding to Request
The students are still weak in pronunciation.
The time to practice the expression is still limited.
Improvement for the next
implementation The students should be given time to understand the
meaning of each vocabulary and know the pronunciation
The new words can be improved.
The rules of game should be more simple and clearer
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
196
The Summary of Interview Conducted in Cycle Two
Points of the
Questions Students’ Answers
The students’ interest
in following the
activities in English
class
The activities done in the class are interesting.
The students are happy because they can directly practice
speaking after understanding the structure.
The activities done in the class do not make the students feel
sleepy.
The students’
perception to the use
of the cue cards
Cue cards help them to understand the material deeper and
faster
The students are happy because they can directly practice
speaking in English
The students admit that cue cards can help them to speak
without writing the script down
The students’ feeling
after playing card
game
The students do not conscious that they are learning speaking
English by playing card game
They do not feel stressful and can understand the expression
deeper
Cue cards make the
students speak more
confidently
The students get the idea about what they are going to say
from the picture and the words on the cards
The students feel more confident because they have tried to
speak the expressions for more than twice, so they have been
accustomed to speak English
Cue cards make the
students speak more
fluently
The students tried hard to speak in the spontaneous because
they are not allowed to write down the script.
The students can speak more fluently because they have tried
to speak the expressions for more than twice, so they have
been accustomed to speak English
The usefulness of the
words on the cue cards
The students are more familiar on the words used in the daily
conversation
The difficulties still
faced by the students
in using the
Expression of Giving
and Responding to
Compliment
Some students are still weak in pronunciation.
Two students admit that they still tend to memorize the
conversation in using communication cards
Improvement for the
next implementation
The cards should be bigger.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
197
The Summary of Interview Conducted in Cycle Three
Points of the Questions Students’ Answers
The students’ interest in
following the activities in
English class
The activities done in the class are interesting and
challenging.
The students are happy because they can directly
practice speaking in English.
The students’ perception to
the use of the cue cards
Cue cards are useful for them to understand the
material deeper and faster
The picture and the words on the cue cards give the
idea about what they are going to say
The students’ feeling after
playing card game
The cue card game make the class not stressful
The students can understand the expression deeper
The students do not conscious that they are learning
speaking English by playing card game
Cue cards make the
students speak more
confidently
The students admit that they are accustomed to speak
in English during the English class.
The students feel more confident because they have
tried to speak the expressions for more than twice, so
they have been accustomed to speak English
The students get the idea about what they are going
to say from the picture and the words on the cards so
they can reduce the pauses
Cue cards make the
students speak more
fluently
The students can speak more fluently because they
have tried to speak the expressions for more than
twice, so they have been accustomed to speak
English
The students have understood “will” and “be going
to” well
They have got the idea about what they are going to
say from the picture and the words on the cards
The usefulness of the
words on the cue cards
The students admit that there are some new words
that are useful to have daily conversation
Students’ understanding in
using the Expression of
Plans and Intensions
All of the interviewee can answer the questions
related to the use of Expression of Plans and
Intensions
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
198
Appendix 12
Observation Checklists
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
199
OBSERVATION CHECKLIST
CYCLE 1
ASPECTS TO BE OBSERVED YES NO COMMENTS
THE
LEARNING
PROCESS
Are the learning steps in
accordance with the lesson
plan?
The steps have already
been fixed with the
lesson plan.
Are the learning objectives
achieved?
At the end, the
students are able to
answer the situation
given by the teacher
Does the learning process
attract the learner’s
attention?
The students can
follow the learning
process
TEACHING
SKILLS
AND
STRATE-
GIES
Does the teacher give clear
instructions to the learners?
The teacher gives
example before asking
the students do the
activity.
Do the cue cards employed
successfully elicit the
learners’ responses?
The learners can use
the cue cards to
practice speaking.
Is the teacher able to
manage the class well?
The students give a lot
of attention to the
teacher
THE
LEARNERS
Are the learners ready to
start the class?
Do the learners do the
teacher’s instruction
attentively?
Only some students
who did not
understand the
instruction because of
lack of attention
Do the learners participate
actively during the
implementation of cue
cards?
The students use
various expressions.
Depok, 29 August 2014
Observer,
Aloysius Wisnu Mahendra
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
200
OBSERVATION CHECKLIST
CYCLE 2 MEETING 1
ASPECTS TO BE OBSERVED YES NO COMMENTS
THE
LEARNING
PROCESS
Are the learning steps in
accordance with the
lesson plan?
Are the learning
objectives achieved?
At the end of the lesson,
the students can create
expression of
compliment based on
the situation provided
Does the learning
process attract the
learner’s attention?
Most of the students are
enthusiastic to play card
game
TEACHING
SKILLS AND
STRATEGIES
Does the teacher give
clear instructions to the
learners?
Some students still
asked his/her friend to
explain what the
teacher said
Do the cue cards
employed successfully
elicit the learners’
responses?
Some students are
passive and need more
encouragement from
the teacher
Is the teacher able to
manage the class well?
Time management for
preparation should be
considered
THE
LEARNERS
Are the learners ready
to start the class?
Do the learners do the
teacher’s instruction
attentively?
Do the learners
participate actively
during the
implementation of cue
cards?
The students looked
happy playing card
games
Depok, 5 September 2014
Observer,
Damariska Oktaviani
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
201
OBSERVATION CHECKLIST
CYCLE 2 MEETING 2
ASPECTS TO BE OBSERVED YES NO COMMENTS
THE
LEARNING
PROCESS
Are the learning steps in
accordance with the
lesson plan?
Are the learning
objectives achieved?
At the end of the lesson,
the students can create
expression of
compliment based on
the situation provided
Does the learning
process attract the
learner’s attention?
Most of the students are
enthusiastic to have
dialogue using
communication cards
TEACHING
SKILLS AND
STRATEGIES
Does the teacher give
clear instructions to the
learners?
Some students still
asked his/her friend to
explain what the
teacher said
Do the cue cards
employed successfully
elicit the learners’
responses?
Some students are
passive and need more
encouragement from
the teacher
Is the teacher able to
manage the class well?
Time management for
preparation should be
considered
THE
LEARNERS
Are the learners ready
to start the class?
Do the learners do the
teacher’s instruction
attentively?
Do the learners
participate actively
during the
implementation of cue
cards?
The students looked
happy playing card
games
Depok, 12 September 2014
Observer,
Damariska Oktaviani
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
202
OBSERVATION CHECKLIST
CYCLE 3 MEETING 1
ASPECTS TO BE OBSERVED YES NO COMMENTS
THE
LEARNING
PROCESS
Are the learning steps in
accordance with the lesson
plan?
Are the learning objectives
achieved?
Most of the students
can make (+/-/?)
sentences for future
tense very well
Does the learning process
attract the learner’s
attention?
Ss are enthusiastic in
listening task.
TEACHING
SKILLS AND
STRATEGIES
Does the teacher give clear
instructions to the learners?
The students looked
so enthusiastic in
this class.
Do the cue cards employed
successfully elicit the
learners’ responses?
There is no card
today.
Is the teacher able to
manage the class well?
Time management
for preparation
should be
considered.
THE
LEARNERS
Are the learners ready to
start the class?
Do the learners do the
teacher’s instruction
attentively?
Today’s material
was challenging
enough, but it was
good to give
exercises from the
easiest ones until the
difficult ones.
Do the learners participate
actively during the
implementation of cue
cards?
Depok, 19 September 2014
Observer,
Emmanuella Venni
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
203
OBSERVATION CHECKLIST
CYCLE 3 MEETING 1
ASPECTS TO BE OBSERVED YES NO COMMENTS
THE
LEARNING
PROCESS
Are the learning steps in
accordance with the lesson
plan?
Are the learning objectives
achieved?
The students could
perform dialogue
very well. Their
fluency has been
improved.
Does the learning process
attract the learner’s
attention?
TEACHING
SKILLS AND
STRATEGIES
Does the teacher give clear
instructions to the learners?
Do the cue cards employed
successfully elicit the
learners’ responses?
The cue card helped
them to explore what
they were going to
say
Is the teacher able to
manage the class well?
THE
LEARNERS
Are the learners ready to
start the class?
Do the learners do the
teacher’s instruction
attentively?
Every student is
interested in perform
in front of the class
Do the learners participate
actively during the
implementation of cue
cards?
Every student has
willingness to
practice speaking
either in the groups
or in pairs.
Depok, 26 September 2014
Observer,
Emmanuella Venni
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
204
Appendix 18
Field Notes
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
205
FIELD NOTES
Meeting 1, Cycle 1 (29 August 2014)
The meeting was held on Friday, 29 August, 2014 at 07.00 AM – 08.30
AM in SMK Negeri 2 Depok, Sleman. The participants of the research were the
students in Kimia Industri Grade X. On that day, there were 5 students who did
not come to the class because of the school occasion. To start the class, the
teacher asked one of the students to lead the opening prayer. After that, the
teacher greeted the students. The students responded to the greeting friendly. Both
the teacher and the students were relaxed and happy. Before introducing the topic
that they were going to learn, the teacher introduced the observer.
To open the topic, the teacher asked some students to stand up, to open the
window, to close the door, and to take out the book using the expression of asking
request. Then, the teacher asked the whole class to guess what the expression it
was. There were a lot of answers about it, so the teacher confirmed the correct
answer and told that it was the material they were going to learn. After the
students knew the correct answer, the teacher asked the student to observe the
material by watching video. The teacher asked the students to watch and listen to
the video carefully. The students watched the video twice. After the second
playing, the teacher gave some grading questions about the general idea of the
video. There were only some students who could answer the questions. The
teacher confirmed the answers so it was so clear for all students. After that, the
teacher gave the task for the students to find out the expressions of asking and
responding to requests in the video. Although the students only watched the video
once again, the students could mention the expression in the video. The video was
interesting and suitable with the topic. The speed of the speeches was not really
fast, so it was easy to catch the main idea of the conversation. However, there
were some students who looked passive in the class. To motivate them, the
teacher mentioned their names and asked them to repeat the answers. The last
activities for observing the class were repeating the conversation in the video and
identifying the structure of the text. Repeating activity was so useful for the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
206
students so they knew how the correct intonation was. It would be better if the
students could repeat the conversation more than once. While in identifying the
structure of the text, the teacher helped the students to conclude the formula.
After that, the teacher distributed the handout. The teacher gave 2 minutes
for the students to read the handout. After 2 minutes, the teacher checked the
students’ understanding by giving the questions. Most of the students could
answer the questions well although they still needed encouragement from the
teacher. In this step, the teacher and the students discussed further about the social
function of expression of asking and responding to request. It was good for the
students’ experience.
In the next activity, the teacher showed a slide which consisted of a picture
and two words. From showing the slide, the teacher asked the students to make an
expression of asking and responding to request. After that, the teacher told them
that they would be a card game. The teacher asked the student to make a group of
four people. To have a simulation, the teacher asked 4 volunteers to come in front
of the class. The simulation was so helpful since the rules of the game were quite
a lot. After everybody in the class understood how to play it, they sat in the group.
Every group got a set of card. The students were so enthusiastic. They enjoyed the
game very much. In this game, one of the members asked a request to another
member using the clues provided in the card. If the other member had the same
card, he/she had to give the card to the one who asked the request. The winner of
the games was the one who could collect the twin cards the most. Most of the
students understood how to play it. The teacher moved around the class to remind
the students to speak English. The teacher also reminded the students to use
various expressions of Asking and Responding to Request.
Generally, this activity is very useful for the students to understand the
expression deeper. It also gave more chance to practice making requests in many
situations. The students also got a lot of new vocabularies from this activity.
However, it needed to be improved. Before the game started, it was better if the
teacher gave more time to the students to explore the card, because not all the
words in the cards were familiar to the students. The students could study the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
207
cards first and they could ask to the teacher about the unfamiliar words. The time
allocation for this activity was enough, but it would be better if the students got
more time.
After finishing the game, the teacher and the students discussed about the
use of expression of asking and responding to request. To confirm the students’
understanding, the teacher told a situation. From the situation, the students were
asked to make an expression of asking and responding to request. There were
many students who were enthusiastic to answer the task. Seeing the enthusiasm of
the students when answering the questions, I can conclude that the goal of today
had been reached well. Cue card really helped the students to understand the
material deeper and gave the students more speaking practice.
Aloysius Wisnu Mahendra
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
208
FIELD NOTES
Cycle 2, Meeting 1 (5 September 2014)
The meeting was held on Friday, 5 September, 2014 at 08.30 AM – 10.00
AM in SMK Negeri 2 Depok, Sleman. The participants of the research were the
students in Kimia Industri Grade X. On that day, there was a student who did not
come to the class. The teacher did not start the class at 08.30 AM because the
class was still used by the previous teacher. The teacher opened the class at 8.50
AM. To start the class, the teacher greeted the students. The students responded to
the greeting friendly. Before introducing the topic that they were going to learn,
the teacher introduced the observer and asked about the students’ presence.
To open the topic, the teacher told that the material of that day was
expression of compliment. Then, the teacher asked the whole class to guess what
the expression it was. There were a lot of answers about it, but there was no one
who could answer correctly. So, the teacher gave some example by giving
compliment some students. After the students knew about the topic, the teacher
confirmed the correct answer. On the observing step, the teacher asked the student
to observe the material by watching video. The teacher asked the students to
watch and listen to the video carefully. The students watched the video twice.
After the second playing, the teacher gave some grading questions about the
general idea of the video. There were only some students who could answer the
questions. The teacher confirmed the answers so it was so clear for the other
students. After that, the teacher gave the task for the students to find out the
expressions of giving and responding to compliment in the video. To mention the
expression in the video, the students needed to watch the video twice. There were
some students who looked passive in the class. To motivate them, the teacher
stood by them side. The last activities for observing the class were repeating the
conversation in the dialogue and identifying the structure of the text. Repeating
activity was so useful for the students so they knew how the correct intonation
was. In this occasion, the students repeated the expression twice. After repeating,
the teacher and the students discussed about the expression of compliment that
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
209
they know. Most of them said the informal compliment. They did not know about
the form of exclamation.
After that, the teacher distributed the handout. The teacher gave 2 minutes
for the students to read the handout. After 2 minutes, the teacher checked the
students’ understanding by giving the questions. Most of the students could
answer the questions well although they still needed encouragement from the
teacher. There was little discussion about adjective and adverbial of manner. It
was useful for the students because perhaps the students forgot about it. In this
step, the teacher and the students discussed further about the social function of
Expression of Giving and Responding to Compliment especially about responding
to compliment among Indonesian people and Western people.
In the next activity, the teacher showed a slide which consisted of a picture
and two words. From showing the slide, the teacher asked the students to make an
expression of giving and responding to compliment. After that, the teacher told
them that they would be a card game. The teacher asked the student to make a
group of four people. Before the cards were distributed to the students, the teacher
showed some slides about adjective and adverb. The teacher asked the students
whether they did not know the words in the slide. The students asked the difficult
words to the teachers. This activity was useful for the students because not all of
the students knew the words well. After that, the teacher asked 4 volunteers to
come in front of the class to have a simulation. The simulation was so helpful
since the rules of the game were quite a lot. After everybody in the class
understood how to play it, they sat in the group. Every group got a set of card. The
students were so enthusiastic. They enjoyed the game very much. In this game,
one of the members gave a compliment to another member using the clues
provided in the card. The one who was giving the compliment should receive the
card although she/he did not have the same card. The one who gave the card had
to take a new card in the middle. The winner of the games was the one who could
collect the twin cards the most. The game would finish if the card in the middle
finished. Most of the students understood how to play it. The teacher moved
around the class to remind the students to speak English. The teacher also
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
210
reminded the students to use various expressions of giving and responding to
compliment.
Generally, this activity was very useful for the students to understand the
expression deeper. It also gave more chance to practice giving compliment in
many situations. The students also got a lot of new vocabularies from this activity.
The time allocation for this activity was enough, but it would be better if the
students could practice speaking outside the class. After finishing the game, the
teacher and the students discussed about the use of expression of giving and
responding to compliment.
At the end, the teacher could help the students to reach the learning goal.
At the end of the class, the teacher told the students that in the next meeting they
would continue this material.
Damariska Oktaviani
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
211
FIELD NOTES
Cycle 2, Meeting 2 (12 September 2014)
The meeting was held on Friday, 12 September, 2014 at 08.30 AM – 10.00
AM in SMK Negeri 2 Depok, Sleman. The participants of the research were the
students in Kimia Industri Grade X. On that day, there was a student who did not
come to the class. The teacher did not start the class at 08.30 AM because the
class was still used by the previous teacher. The teacher opened the class at 8.50
AM. To start the class, the teacher greeted the students. The students responded
the greeting friendly. Before introducing the topic that they were going to learn,
the teacher introduced the observer and asked about the students’ presence.
The objective of the material was the students were able to practice the
Expression of Giving and Responding to Compliment in the daily conversation.
At first, the teacher asked whether the students remembered the previous material
or not. Most of the students remembered the previous material but they failed to
make Expression of Giving and Responding to Compliment in the form of “
how”. To remind the students about Expression of Giving and Responding to
Compliment, the teacher asked the students to identify how to make Expression of
Giving and Responding to Compliment using “how” and “what”.
After the students remembered on how to make Expression of Giving and
Responding to Compliment, the teacher gave examples of Expression of Giving
and Responding to Compliment in Bahasa Indonesia to some students. Most of
the students did not respond the expression. There were a few students who said
“terimakasih”. After asking some students, the teacher asked the whole class to
compare the Expression of Giving and Responding to Compliment in Indonesia
and Western cultures. There was one student who answered that sometimes they
felt uneasy if they got compliment. They were afraid if the other people thought
that they were arrogant. It was a nice discussion. It helped the student to build
their characteristic as young people.
After that discussion, the teacher asked the students to read a dialogue
provided in PowerPoint slide. Then, the teacher asked two students to be
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
212
volunteers to read the dialogue. The students in this class were very active. They
did the teachers’ instruction enthusiastically. Then, the teacher gave some
comprehension questions related to the dialogue. After that, the teacher told that
they had to perform a dialogue using cue cards provided in front of the class. The
teacher explained how to use the cue card briefly.
Some of the students understood what they had to do. Some of the students
did not understand and needed peer’s or teacher’s guidance. Teacher gave 3
minutes for the students to prepare the dialogue. During the preparation, the
teacher allowed the students to ask about difficult words or about pronunciation.
After 3 minutes, the students practiced the dialogue two by two. There were 15
groups that practiced speaking in front of the class. One dialogue consisted of 2-5
minutes. Some of the groups used the expression appropriately with some
elaboration. They could speak fluently. However, there were a lot of
mispronunciations that the students made. Fortunately, the teacher was aware
about that and sometimes she corrected the mistakes.
After all the students performed the dialogue, the teacher reviewed what
they had studied. According to the performances, most of the students could
understand how to give and respond to a compliment correctly.
Generally, the teaching steps were conducted very well. The activity that
had been prepared could attract the students to speak actively. The thing that
should be improved from this teaching and learning process was students’
pronunciation. There were a lot of mispronunciations that I heard. If the teacher
did not have much time to give feedback, teacher could ask the students to bring
dictionary. So, whenever students were not sure about the pronunciation, they
could consult on the dictionary.
Damariska Oktaviani
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
213
FIELD NOTES
Cycle 3, Meeting 1 (19 September 2014)
The meeting was held on Friday, 19 September, 2014 at 08.30 AM – 10.00
AM in SMK Negeri 2 Depok, Sleman. The participants of the research were the
students in Kimia Industri Grade X. On that day, everybody came to the class.
The teacher did not start the class at 08.30 AM because the class was still used by
the previous teacher. The teacher opened the class at 8.45 AM. To start the class,
the teacher greeted the students. The students responded to the greeting friendly.
Before introducing the topic that they were going to learn, the teacher introduced
the observers.
To open the topic, the teacher asked what day it was. The students
answered it enthusiastically. Then, the teacher asked what they were going to do
the next day. There were a lot of answers from the students. After that, the teacher
asked the students to come in front of the class and wrote their plans in front of
the class. There were 10 students who wrote their plans on the black board. From
those answers, the teacher asked the students to conclude what they were going to
study. Most of the students could answer correctly. The teacher had successfully
guided the students to observe the material.
After the students knew about the topic, the teacher explained how to
make future plans using “will” and “be going to”. The discussion was very deep.
The students could make the negative, the interrogative for yes/no questions and
question-word questions. The students were very active and enthusiastic when the
teacher asked them to do in front of the class.
After observing step, the teacher distributed the handout.The teacher gave
2 minutes for the students to read the handout. After 2 minutes, the teacher
checked the students’ understanding by giving the questions. Most of the students
could answer the questions well. There was a short discussion about the social
function of “will” and “be going to”. It was useful for the students’ knowledge.
In the next activity, the teacher played a recording. The students were
asked to listen and repeat the recording. The recording was about 5 words. The
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
214
students enjoyed the activities. They listen to the recording and asked the teacher
to play twice. After the second listening, the teacher asked the students to take a
note while listening. After the third listening, the teacher asked the student to
write the correct words in front of the class. The students were enthusiastic. There
was a student who failed to write the words correctly. This activity was good for
the students. It helped the students a lot to familiarize the English sound.
After listening to the English words, the teacher challenged the students to
listen to English sentences. The sentences that the students were going to listen
were related to the expression of plans and intentions. The first listening, the
students listened and repeated the sentences. The second listening, the students
listened and took a note. The third listening, the students confirmed on what they
had listened to. After that, the students were asked to write the correct sentences
in front of the class. There was a sentence which was not complete and correct.
Basically, the activity was so simple but the teacher successfully gave deeper
understanding about the expression.
The next activity was listening to the dialogue. The students were asked to
listen and complete a dialogue. To complete the dialogue, the students need to
listen 3 times. After that, the teacher and the students discussed the dialogue.
After discussing the dialogue, the teacher asked some students to read the
dialogue loudly.
Today’s material was challenging enough for the students. However, the
teacher helped the students to understand the material very well. At the end of the
class, the teacher told the students that in the next meeting they would continue
this material.
Emmanuella Venni
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
215
FIELD NOTES
Cycle 3, Meeting 2 (26 September 2014)
The meeting was held on Friday, 26 September, 2014 at 08.30 AM – 10.00
AM in SMK Negeri 2 Depok, Sleman. The participants of the research were the
students in Kimia Industri Grade X. On that day, there was a student who did not
come to the class. The teacher did not start the class at 08.30 AM because the
class was still used by the previous teacher. The teacher opened the class at 8.45
AM. To start the class, the teacher greeted the students. The students responded
the greeting friendly. Before starting to the material, the teacher did short friendly
talk to create warm atmosphere in the class.
First, the teacher asked the students to imagine that they would have one
week holiday. After around 3 minutes, the teacher asked the students to share their
imagination. There were 3 students who shared their imagination. Their
imagination was interesting. The three students could reveal their imagination
using simple present tense and future tense. However, there were some mistakes.
When the students made mistakes, the teacher directly corrected the mistakes and
asked the students to repeat the correct sentences. This technique successfully
helped the students to remind them about the previous material. Observing step
ended after reviewing the use of “be going to” and “will”.
After the teacher made sure that the students understood the use of “be
going to” and “will”, the teacher asked the students to look at the picture on the
slide and made future tense based on the cue provided on the slide. On that slide,
there were two words and a picture. For example, there were a picture of chain
and words of “chain” and “fix”. The students were expected to make future tense
using those clues. Most of the student could guess that they would play card
games. They were so enthusiastically after knowing that they would play card
games. In this case, the teacher explained the rules briefly because the rules were
the same as the previous ones. Before distributing the cards, the students read the
vocabulary provided on the slide. The teacher asked the students whether they did
not know the meaning of the words or did not know how to pronounce the words
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
216
well. Some of the students asked about the pronunciations of the words. After
that, the teacher distributed the cards and let the students played. During the game,
the teacher moved around to assess the students speaking and made sure they
practiced the speaking. It was not difficult to ask the students to speaking. The
students had been accustomed to on this game. After 20 minutes, the teacher
asked the students to stop the game and collected the cards. While collecting the
cards, the teacher asked who won the game and how far their understanding in
making future tense was.
After that activity, the teacher showed a slide which was provided a
dialogue. The students were asked to read the dialogue quickly. After that, the
teacher chose two students to read the dialogue. After the students finished
reading, the teacher gave some comprehension questions. All of the students
could answer the questions so it could be concluded that the students understood
the dialogue well. Then, students were divided into two big groups. First group
would be character A and another group would be character B. After that, the
students were asked to work in pairs. The students had to make dialogue based on
the cue provided. The theme was about holiday and it was very interesting. Most
of the students were happy and enthusiastic with those speaking cards. The
teacher gave 5 minutes for the students to prepare the dialogue. During the
preparation, the students asked on how to pronounce words well. On the dialogue,
the students were expected to make questions in future tense and answered the
questions completely.
The learning and teaching process could be conducted well. The learning
objectives that the students could identify future tense, produced future tense and
practiced speaking well could be reached. All the students could practice speaking
in front of the class. The fluency of the students was getting better. There was less
unnecessary pauses so that the students could speak more naturally.
Emmanualla Venni
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJIPLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI