Pipeline Hydraulic Design Proposal - · PDF filePipeline Hydraulic Design Proposal ... Project Code: Charge Code: 4032800002 ... Hydraulic Design Proposal which identifies the

Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09 Rev. 3.6 Page i of62 Issue Date: August 23 , 20 11

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING

Hydraulic Design Proposal -Mainline

Company Confidential

Pipeline Hydraulic Design Proposal Northern Gateway Pipeline - 36" Crude Oil / 20" Condensate

Project Code: <459.01> Charge Code: 4032800002 Prepared by: Maury Porter, P. Eng I Yuntong She I Gary Carmichael Revision: 3.6 Issue Date: August 23, 201 1

Enbridge Pipelines Inc.

Note: This is a prelimimuy DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)

Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09 Rev. 3.6 Page 2 of 62 Issue Date: August 23 , 2011

Table of Contents




DGE

1 Executive Summary ................................................................................... .........................•................ 3 2 Project Background & Scope of Work ................................................................................................ 4

2.1 Background ... ..................................................................................... .................................... 4 2.1.1 Revision History ......................................................................... 5

2.2 Scope of Work ........................................................................... .. ................... .. .. ................ ... 6 2.2.1 Business Development Engineering - Hydraulics Design ..... 6 2.2.2 Facilities Management ............................................................... 6 2.2.3 Deliverables ................................................................................ 7 2.2.4 Assumptions ............................................................................... 7 2.2.5 Scope Not Included .................................................................. 11

3 Hydraulic Design ................................................................................................................................ 12 3.1 Pipeline ·Facilities ................................................................................................................ 13

3.1.1 J-Curves and Diameter Selection ............................................ 13 3.1.2 Line Description ....................................................................... 14

3.2 Pump Station Facilities ................. ............................................ ... ... ....... ............................. 17 3.2.1 Station Locations ..................................................................... 17 3.2.2 Pump Plan ................................................................................. 19 3.2.3 Power ......................................................................................... 23 3.2.4 Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) .............................................. 31 3.2.5 Case Pressure Limits ............................................................... 32 3.2.6 Pump Standby .......................................................................... 33

3.3 Operational Limitations and Concerns .............................................................................. 35 3.3.1 Petroleum Quality and Batching ............................................. 35 3.3.2 Minimum Reynolds Number ......................... ........................... 35 3.3.3 Maximum Mainline Fluid Velocities ........................................ 35 3.3.4 Operating Limits ....................................................................... 36

3.4 Pipeline Thermal Analysis ................................................................................................... 39 3.4.1 Annual Average Temperature Profile ................. .. .................. 39 3.4.2 Maximum Temperature Analysis ............................................. 42

4 Transient Analysis .............................................................................................................................. 45 4.1 Crude Oil Pipeline System ........................ ............. .. ................ ............................................ 45 4.2 Condensate Pipeline System .................................... .......................................................... 47

5 Risk Management ............................................................................................................................... 49 5.1 Risk Register ......................................................................................................................... 49

Appendix A: Product Specification ......................................................................................................... 50 Appendix B: Batch Plans .......................................................................................................................... 51 Appendix C: Pump Curves ................................. ...................................................................................... 52 Appendix D: Graphical Hydraulic Profiles .............................................................................................. 55 Appendix E: Sensitivity Analysis ............................................................................................................. 59

Pump Design Limit Basis ..................... .................................................................... .................... 59 Maximum Temperature Design Limit Basis ................................................................................. 61

Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for infomlation only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by intemal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)

Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09 Rev. 3.6



Page 3 of62 Issue Date: August 23,2011


1 Executive Summary Business 0 evelopment (BO) has requested th at Business Oevelopme nt Engineering (BOE) Hydraulic Oesig n Group prepare a Hy draulic Design Proposal for the En bridge Gateway Pi pelines Proj ect (the Project). The Project will consist of a crude oil pip eline system to transport oil f rom the Bruderheim Terminal, locat ed near Bru derheim, Alberta to the Kitimat Terminal located near Kitimat, British Colombia. The Project also includes a condensa te pipeline system to unload cond ensate (Oilu ent) from ship at the K itimat Terminal and transport it to the Bruderheim Terminal for distribution to markets in Alberta.

The proposed system consists of:

Crude Oil Pipeline

• From Bruderheim Terminal to Kitimat Terminal - 731.274 miles (1 176.869 km) of NPS 36, X70 grade pipe with an average wall thickness of 0.665"

• Total Pump Facilities Required at Phase I (525 kbpd ann ual) - 7 stat ions, 28 x 5,750 hp pump and motor units, 7 x 6,000 hp VFOs

• Total Pump Facil ities Required at Phase IV (850 kbpd annual) -1 2 stations, 80 x 5,750 hp pump and motor units , 12 x 6,000 hp VFDs

• 38°C maximum inlet temperature

Condensate Pipeline

• From Kitimat Terminal to Bruderheim Terminal -731 .274 miles (1176.869 km) o f NPS 20, X70 grade pipe with an average wall thickness of 0.273"

• Total Pump Facilities Required at Phase I (193 kbpd ann ual) - 9 stat ions, 18 x 5,750 hp pump and motor units, 9 x 6,000 hp VFOs

• Total Pump Facilities Required at Phase III (275 kbpd annual) - 15 stations, 31 x 5,750 hp pump and motor units, 15 x 6,000 hp VFOs

This report also contain s preliminary design information for future exp ansion phases. Northern Gateway notes that the se expansion facilities are not part of the applied for Project; the information provided has been primarily developed from a hydraulics perspective and to assist in syste m design and pipe wall thickne ss selection. Further work would be done during detailed engineering to finalize th e hydraulic design and the locations of any potential future pump stations. Any futu re expansion scenario and associated facilities beyond the applied for Project would be the subject of a future design review and optimization.

The following report pro vides the a ssumptions and inputs, as well as t he details of the hydraulic studies for the proposed design.

Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 20 II) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous rev iew by internal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)






2 Project Background & Scope of Work

2.1 Background

'&INB I

Business Development Engineering (BDE) Hydraulic Design Group prepared an

GE

unclassified Hydraulic Design Proposal for th e construction of a Greenfield pip eline system to transport liq uid hydrocarbons between central Alberta and western British Colombia in Canada. The proposed system consists of:

• A Crude Oil Pipeline which will ca rry crude oil from Bruderheim Terminal to Kitimat Terminal.

• A Condensate Pipelin e which will carry condensate (Diluent) from Kitimat Terminal to Bruderheim Terminal.

The followin g pipeline capacities were identif ied for use in the design of the Crud e Oil Line:

Capacity Summary (bpd)

Phase Annual Operating Design (90% of Design) (95 % of Design)

I 525,000 554,167 583,333 II 600,000633,333 666,667 III 750,000 791,667 833,333 IV 850,000897,222 944,444

The following pipeline capacities were identified for use in the design of the Condensate Line:

Capacity Summary (bpd)

Phase Annual Operating Design (90% of Design) (95 % of Design)

I 193,000203,722 214,444 II 250,000 263,889 277,778 III 275,000 290,278 305,556

Note: the Annual Capacity is the capacity required by the business and is provided by the Business Development sponsor. Flow rates for all ph ases are co nsidered in wall thickness design, but only the hydraulic resu Its of Phase I (initia I) and Ultimate are presented in this report.

Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for infollllatioll only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)


Page 5 of62 Issue Date: August 23,201 1




A significant amount of hydraulics related work has been d one on this project and this effort should be recognized. Some but not all areas carried out were:

oJ-curve analysis

• Steady State Hydraulics - heavy and light wall thickness designs, station locating considering electrical infrastructure issues

• Preliminary pump selection

• Transient Analysis by Tau Engineering - NPS 30 - 10 st ation parallel an d series configurations for crude oil and series for condensate line

An attempt to compile this information and updated information in d carried out as this project was re-initiated.

2.1.1 Revision History

etail has been

August 23, 2011 - Unclassified Hydraul ic Design Proposal v3.6 - Issued for Information

- updated and revised for final NEB IR Submission

August 23, 2011 - Unclassified Hydraulic Design Proposal v3.5 - Issued for Information




August 16,2011 - Unclassified Hydraulic Design Proposal v3.3 -Issued for Information




August 10,2011 - Unclassified Hydraulic Design Proposal v3.1 -Issued for Information


August 5, 2011 - Unclassified Hydraulic Design Proposal v3.0 - Issued for Information

- updated with route revision T and updated manufacturer's pump curves

Note: This is a preliminaIY DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for infom1ation only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by intemal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)

Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09 Rev. 3.6 Page 6 of62 Issue Date: August 23,2011




GE

October 20, 2009 - Un classified Hydraulic Design Proposal v2.0 - is sued for internal stakeholder review

- updated with route revision R

July 22, 2009 - Unclassified Hydraulic Design Proposal v1.1

- updated with operating limits

- updated with thermal study results

April 29, 2009 - Unclassified Hydraulic Design Proposal v1.0

- to be cir culated in t he project team for the purpose assumptions

2.2 Scope of Work

of confirmin g scope a nd

2.2.1 Business Development Engineering - Hydraulics Design

The following scope of work has been identified:

2.2.1.1 Task 1: Pipeline, Pump Station and DRA Facilities

BDE Hydraulics will identify the pump and pipeline facilities required to meet the desired throughputs. Pipeline wall thickne ss, pump station facilit ies, and exp ansion plan s to meet the required annual capacities have been identified in this proposal.

2.2.1.2 Task 2: Tank and Terminal Facilities

• A review will be conducted upon receipt of the tank and ter minal facility design from consultants

• BDE Hydraulics will provide power requirement for booster pumps. It is assumed that others will select and size the booster pumps.

2.2.2 Facilities Management

Initial power costs estimation has been performed by Enbridge's Fa cilities Management Group (FACMAN) base d on the tot al horsepower of the hydraulic design. Operational feasibility assessments are to be performed by Facilities Management upon completion of the final hydraulic design.

Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3 .6 dated August 23, 20ll) and has been issued for infonnation only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)


Page 7 of62 Issue Date: August 23, 2011




2.2.3 Deliverables

The Business Development Engin eering Hydraulic Desig n group has developed this Hydraulic Design Proposal which identifies the new facilities required to meet the scope as defined above. A design review meeting wi th the relevant internal stakeholders will also be conducted.

2.2.4 Assumptions

2.2.4.1 Model Files

There are no base files for th is project as it is a Greenfield project. The following names represent the current hydraulic model files in use:

Crude Oil Line Model File:

Phase I: E28-N00310-REVT-v1A-PH1-Ann

Phase IV: E28-N0031 O-REVT -v2A-U L T -Ann

Condensate Line Base File:

Phase I: E29-N00310-REVT-v1A-PH1-Ann

Phase III: E29-N00310-REVT-v2A-ULT-Ann

2.2.4.2 Pressure Boundary Conditions

Condition Pressure

psig Injection Pressure @Bruderheim 75

Injection Pressure @Kitimat 75 Station Suction (Minimum) 50

Terminal Holding (Minimum) 100

2.2.4.3 Allowable Design Limits Flow Rate (bpd)

Minimum Flow I TBD I Maximum Flow Temperature (0C)

I

Minimum Temp I TBD I Maximum Inlet Temp I Velocity (ttls)

Minimum Velocity I TBD I Maximum Velocity I

944 kbpd

38°C

20 ftIs (stn)

Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for information oniy. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)

Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09 Rev. 3.6 Page 8 of62 Issue Date: August 23 , 2011




Soil Properties

11_

11-

11-

11-Note: Soil properties are based on the AMEC 2005 report on thermal conditions for the Northern Gateway route. Therefore, some uncertainties can be expected and a sen sitivity analysis has been conducted around these soil properties. According to the comments of an industry recognized ex pert in the field of pipe line heat tra nsfer modeling, it is recommended that additional soil sample to be taken during the detailed engineering phase of the project.

Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by intemal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)





2.2.4.5 Fluid Properties Fluid Properties

Density @ 15°C T1 Viscosity @ T1 TVP@

Fluid Identifier T1 kg/m3 °C cSt kPa

OX193 .0 11.9 350.0 20.9 Dilbit

HVB.Q3B 35.3 17.5 350.0 -Light Oi l 21E 829.2 4.0 9.7 -Diluent 7 )E 731.0 7.5 1.24 34.2

NBRIDGE

T2 Viscosity @ T2 TVP@ RVP

T2 °C cSt kPa kPa

21.2 177.1 36.1 64.3

26.8 177.1 - -18.3 6.2 - 31.7

21.0 1.07 56.9 80.6

Note: Single product was assumed in this proposed desig n. There are possibilities of shipping multiple products in the Northern Gateway Delivery System. The OX1 is used in the model t 0 determine the system design requirements of the oil pipeline. HVB.Q3B is the diluted bitumen blended to a summer reference temperature. This fluid specification will be used in model runs to determin e the worst case (summer) te mperature profile only. The 21 E is light crude and will be used to generate the worst case scenario in the operating limits study.

2.2.4.6 Fluid Injection Temperatures Injection Temperature

I Pipeline Injection Flow Rate

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Annual

I Location kbpd Average I

OF °C OF °C OF °C OF DC DF DC

Crude Oil line Bruderheim 583 50 9.8 53 11.5 0 21.1 3 11.5 531 .5

Crude Oil line Bruderheim 944 50 9.8 53 11.5 ( 0 15.6 3 11.5 571, .9

Condensate line Kitimat 214 40 4.4 45 7.27D 21.1 50 9.8 487.3 I

Condensate line Kitimat 306 40 4.4 45 7.27D 21.1 50 9.8 487.3 I

Note: As suggested by Facilities Management. For the maximum in-line temperature studies, a summer injection temperature of 38.0°C (1 OOA OF) was used as decided by the project team.

Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)


2.2.4.7




•

Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3 .6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)




Hydraulic Design ProposalMainline


2.2.5 Scope Not Included

The following scope has not been considered a s part of the baseline estimates for cost and schedule in this proposal:

o Tankage requirement at injection and delivery locations

o Terminal facilities

Note: This is a preliminruy DRAFT (v3 .6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for infoTl1lation only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)





IDGE Company Confidential

3 Hydraulic Design The followin g sectio ns describe th e detailed pipeline and related facilities require d to achieve the desired th roughput for the pipelines describ ed above in Section 2.1 : Background.

For design purposes, the following capacity definitions are required:

• Design Capacity - Maximum theoretical capacity of the pipeline assuming ideal operating conditions, which mayor may not be achievable in actual operation.

• Operating Capacity - Sustainable average capacity re suIting from ta king into account un -planned e vents such as un- scheduled maintenance, operating problems, leaks, varia tions from forecast, an d schedulin g proble ms (95% 0 f Design Capacity).

• Annual Average Capacity - Sustainable average capacity on an annu al basis taking into account planned eve nts such a s schedu led maintenance and construction (90% of Design Capacity).

The following design philosophy represents Enbridge's typical appr oach for pipeline design. Thermal effects can playa large role in determining the achievable capacity of a pipeline, especially in heavy crud e lines where frictional heating ca n contribute to a significant increase of in-line crude temperat ures. With a n increase in temperatu res there is a decrease in fluid visco sity resultin g in lower pressure dr ops and highe r predicted capacities. Therefore, these effect s must be taken into account when completing a hydraulic design.

Enbridge's design philo sophy invol ves two steps. The first step involves solving an energy balance where the frictional heating generated by the annual average capa city, and the flu id heat tran sferred to th e soil durin g annual average conditions, deter mines the resulting in-line fluid temperature profile.

Secondly, the temperature profile created at the annual average capacity is force don the pressure drop calculations at t he design rates, resulting in a conservative pressure drop calculation at the design capacity due to the realistic th ermal profile created at t he annual average capacit y. Impleme nting this philosophy reduces the possibility of over estimating the design capacity of the pipeline.

For the detailed ste ady state hydraulic design r temperatures, and power) please refer to Appendix E.

esults ( capacity, pressures,

Note: This is a preliminruy DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 20 II) and has been issued for infonnation only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)

Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09 Rev. 3.6 Page 13 of62 Issue Date: August 23, 2011




3.1 Pipeline Facilities

3.1.1 J·Curves and Diameter Selection

BDE Hydraulics conducted the J-Curve and diameter selection study for the oil line . The diameter 36" was selected for this pipeline design based 0 n the econo mic results as shown in the following figure.

Normalized Cost of Service

1.00

\ \ \

'" " ~ ~ . ., ~. -------'~~ --~

------ ::----.. - ---t , .. .;~ ~--~~--~

c.:. "

0.90

0.80

0.70

0.60

0.50

0.40

0.30

--+-NPS 24-A

_____ NPS 30-8

NPS 36-C

- NPS42-D

0.20

0.10

0.00

200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 900,000 1,000,000 1,100 ,000

bblld

BDE Hydraulics conducted the J-Curve and diam eter selection study for the conden sate line. The d iameter 20" was select ed for th is pipeline design based 0 n the econo mic results as shown in the following figure.

Normalized Cost of Service

1.00

'" ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ":--- ......

-----u:: ~ ~ :.~

0.90

0.80

0.70

0.60

0.50

0.40

0.30

--+- NPS 16-A

____ NPS 20-8

NPS 24-C

---it- NPS 30-D

0.20

0.10

0.00

100,000 125,000 150,000 175,000 200,000 225,000 250,000 275,000 300,000 325,000

bbl/d

Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,201 1) and has been issued for infonnation only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)





3.1.2 Line Description

3.1.2.1 Crude Oil Pipeline • Outer Diameter - 36 inches

• FromlTo - From Bruderheim Station to Kitimat Terminal

(S Length - 731.274 miles (1176.869 km)

o Steel Grade - X70

13 Approximate Steel Tonnage - 484,735 tons (imperial)

Pipe From To Length Proposed Wall MOP Segment KP KP km in psig kPag

1 0.000 24.551 24.551 0.781 2,430 16,753

2 24.551 231.522 206.971 0.719 2,237 15,423

3 231.522 286.769 55.247 0.656 2,041 14,071

4 286.769 295.500 8.731 0.719 2,237 15,423

5 295.500 324.500 29.000 0.656 2,041 14,071

6 324.500 331.200 6.700 0.625 1,944 13,406

7 331.200 347.150 15.950 0.656 2,041 14,071

8 347.150 361.850 14.700 0.625 1,944 13,406

9 361.850 364.249 2.400 0.656 2,041 14,071

10 364.249 373.849 9.600 0.625 1,944 13,406

11 373.849 387.749 13.900 0.656 2,041 14,071

12 387.749 418.999 31.250 0.719 2,237 15,423

13 418.999 427.001 8.002 0.781 2,430 16,753

14 427.001 493.499 66.498 0.719 2,237 15,423

15 493.499 496.149 2.651 0.781 2,430 16,753

16 496.149 502.149 6.000 0.719 2,237 15,423

17 502.149 522.599 20.450 0.656 2,041 14,071

18 522.599 564.498 41.899 0.563 1,752 12,077

19 564.498 570.099 5.601 0.594 1,848 12,742

20 570.099 586.348 16.250 0.625 1,944 13,406

21 586.348 594.348 8.000 0.656 2,041 14,071

22 594.348 602.498 8.150 0.719 2,237 15,423

23 602.498 605.149 2.651 0.656 2,041 14,071

24 605.149 612.899 7.751 0.594 1,848 12,742

25 612.899 619.948 7.049 0.563 1,752 12,077

26 619.948 635.998 16.050 0.469 1,459 10,OGO -

27 635.998 642.249 6.251 0.594 1,848 12,742

28 642.249 647.399 5.150 0.656 2,041 14,071

29 647.399 . 681.499 34.100 0.719 2,237 15,423

30 681.499 687.549 6.050 0.625 1,944 13,406

31 687.549 712.349 24.800 0.656 2,041 14,071

32 712.349 725.098 12.749 0.719 2,237 15,423

33 725.098 739.299 14.201 0.656 2,041 14,071

34 739.299 779.199 39.900 0.719 2,237 15,423

35 779.199 809.548 30.349 0.656 2,041 14,071

36 809.548 836.798 27.249 0.719 2,237 15,423

37 836.798 842.899 6.101 0.625 1,944 13,406

Steel Tonnage

Tons (Imperial)

11,831

91,983

22,442

3,880

11,780

2,595

6,479

5,694

975

3,718

5,646

13,888

3,856

29,553

1,277

2,666

8,307

14,645

2,064

6,294

3,250

3,622

1,077

2,856

2,464

4,686

2,303

2,092

15,155

2,343

10,074

5,666

5,768

17,733

12,328

12,110

2,363

Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for infonnation only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)



Pipe From Segment KP

38 842.899

39 847.149

40 851.148

41 854.198

42 865.298

43 869.899

44 877.099

45 886.749

46 889.848

47 892.200

48 901.748 49 917.598

50 924.348

51 927.148

52 928.849

53 933.897

54 935.248

55 936.299

56 939.849

57 946.248

58 950.899

59 954.499

60 · 959.948

61 972.848

62 976.197

63 981.449

64 988.849

65 998.698

66 1005.599

67 1014.498

68 1029.000

69 1031.647

70 1043.449

71 1054.848 72 1063.648

73 1071.398

74 1087.405

75 1089.598 76 1094.347

77 1170.048




To length Proposed Wall MOP

·KP km in psig

847.149 4.250 0.594 1,848

851.148 3.999 0.500 1,556

854.198 3.050 0.563 1,752

865.298 11.100 0.625 1,944

869.899 4. 601 0.656 2,041

877.099 7.200 0.625 1,944

886.749 9.650 0.563 1,752 889.848 3.100 0.625 1,944

892.200 2.352 0.594 1,848

901.748 9.548 0.563 1,752

917.598 15.850 0.500 1,556

924.348 6.750 0.563 1,752

927.148 2.800 0.656 2,041

928.849 1.701 0.719 2,237

933.897 5.049 0.625 1,944

935.248 1.350 0.594 1,848

936.299 1.051 0.594 1,848

939.849 3.550 0.563 1,752

946.248 6.399 0.500 1,556

950.899 4.651 0.594 1,848

954.499 3.600 0.563 1,752

959.948 5.449 0.469 1,459

972.848 12.900 0.406 1,263

976.197 3.349 0.469 1,459

981.449 5.251 0.500 1,556

988.849 7.400 0.594 1,848

998.698 9.849 0.563 1,752

1005.599 6.901 0.656 2,041

1014.498 8.900 0.594 1,848

1029.000 14.502 0.625 1,944 1031.647 2.647 0.563 1,752

1043.449 11.801 0.625 1,944

1054.848 11.399 0.563 1,752

1063.648 8.800 0.594 1,848

107l.398 7.751 0.563 1,752

1087.405 16.007 0.594 1,848

1089.598 2.193 0.656 2,041

1094.347 4.749 0.719 2,237

1170.048 75.700 0.781 2,430

1176.871 6.824 0.781 2,430

ENBRIDGE

Steel Tonnage

kPag Tons (Imperial)

12,742 1,566

10,725 1,244

12,077 1,066

13,406 4,299

14,071 1,869

13,406 2,789

12,077 3,373 13,406 1,201

12,742 867

12,077 3,337 10,725 4,929 12,077 2,359

14,071 1,138

15,423 756

13,406 1,956 12,742 498

12,742 387 12,077 1,241 10,725 1,990

12,742 1,714

12,077 1,258

10,060 1,591

8,709 3,266

10,060 978 10,725 1,633

12,742 2,727 12,077 3,443 14,071 2,803

12,742 3,279

13,406 5,617 12,077 925

13,406 4,571

12,077 3,984 12,742 3,242 12,077 2,709

12,742 5,898

14,071 891 15,423 2,111 16,753 36,480

16,753 3,288

Note: SM YS MAOP i s the Maximum Allowable 0 perating Pres sure based on t he prel iminary desi gned wall thickness and the Barlow Equation. No considerations for actual planned hydro-test pressW"es, which may be lower, are included.

Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for infol1nation only. It has not undergone a rigorous rev iew by internal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)






3.1.2.2 Condensate Pipeline • Outer Diameter - 20 inches

• FromlTo - Kitimat Terminal to Bruderheim Terminal

• Length - 731.274 miles (1176.869 km)

• Steel Grade - X70

• Approximate Steel Tonnage - 111,053 tons (imperial)

Pipe From To length Proposed Wall Segment KP KP km in psig

1 0.000 47.500 47.500 0.297 1,663

2 47.500 92.149 44.649 0.312 1,747

3 92.149 347.719 255.570 0.250 1,400

4 347.719 503.725 156.006 0.297 1,663

5 503.725 667.949 164.224 0.250 1,400

6 667.949 885.677 217.728 0.297 1,663

7 885.677 969.212 83.535 0.250 1,400

8 969.212 1066.590 97.378 0.297 1,663

9 1066.590 1126.541 59.951 0.250 1,400

10 1126.541 1176.871 50.331 0.250 1,400

01 ENS IDGE

MOP Steel Tonnage

kPag Tons (Imperial)

11,467 4,870

12,047 4,805

9,653 22,108

11,467 15,994

9,653 14,206

11,467 22,322

9,653 7,226

11,467 9,983

9,653 5,186

9,653 4,354

Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for infornlation only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)





3.2 Pump Station Facilities

ENBRIDGE

BDE Hydra ulics h as pr oposed a pump selection and pu mp plan for each of th e flow stages with the appropriate number of pumps, pump/motor sizes, and minimum required VFD sizes. The pump plans for th e future flo w phases h ave not und ergone extensive reviews with Engineering Services or the pum p manufacturer. Therefore, BDE Hydraulics recommends a detailed review of the proposed future pump plans at the appropriate time during detailed engineering.

3.2.1 Station Locations

3.2.1.1 Crude Oil Pump Stations

The Gateway Delivery System crude oil pipeline will start at Phase I with seven (7) pump stations, and will expand to encompass twelve (12) pump stations in total at Phase IV.

The proposed station locations for the oil pipeline are summarized in the table below:

Station (HAINAGE (m) (HAINAGE (km) ELEVATION (m) UTME UTMN ZONE

Bruderheim 0.0 0.0 623.0 364,279 5,964,720 12

Majeau 98,000.0 98.0 713.0 659,786 5,969,024 11

Whitecourt 203,267.1 203.3 753.8 579,695 6,005,207 11

Fox Creek 286,808.6 286.8 860.5 502,839 6,027,042 11

Smoky River 400,733.8 400.7 784.0 410,493 6,065,773 11

Elmworth 506,632.2 506.6 843.0 319,684 6,086,216 11

Tumbler Ridge 600,906.7 600.9 845.3 615,383 6,074,335 10

Bear Lake 719,650.7 719.7 715.9 519,557 6,040,283 10

Fort St. James 828,401.1 828.4 720.0 416,897 6,026,782 10

Burns Lake 929,347.6 929.3 847.1 321,593 6,015,353 10

Houston 1,006,033.1 1006.0 680.9 640,322 6,008,003 9

Clearwater 1,129,293.4 1129.3 211.0 530,634 6,014,828 9

Kitimat Te rmi nal 1,176,870.7 1176.9 158.0 518,460 5,977,762 9


(A39833)






3.2.1.2 Condensate Pump Stations

GE

The Gateway Delivery System con densate pip eline will start at Phase I with nin e (9) pump stations, and will expand to encompass fifteen (15) stations in total at Phase III.

The proposed station locations for the condensate pipeline are summarized in the table below:

Station CHAINAGE (m) CHAINAGE (km) ELEVATION (m) UTME UTMN ZONE

Kitimat Terminal 0.0 0.000 158.0 518,460 5,977,762 9 Clearwater 47,577.3 47.577 211.0 530,634 6,014,828 9

Clore 92,149.0 92.149 TBD TBD TBD TBD

Houston 170,837.6 170.838 680.9 640,322 6,008,003 9

Burns Lake 247,523.1 247.523 847.1 321,593 6,015,353 10

Future Station 1 293,249.0 293.249 TBD TBD TBD TBD

Fort St. James 348,469.6 348.470 720.0 416,897 6,026,782 10 Bear Lake 457,220.0 457.220 715.9 519,557 6,040,283 10

Future Station 2 503,723.0 503.723 TBD TBD TBD TBD

Tumbler Ridge 575,964.0 575.964 845.3 615,383 6,074,335 10

Elmworth 670,238.5 670.239 843.0 319,684 6,086,216 11 Smoky River 776,136.9 776.137 784.0 410,493 6,065,773 11

Fox Creek 890,062.1 890.062 860.5 502,839 6,027,042 11

Whitecourt 973,603.6 973.604 753.8 579,695 6,005,207 11

Majeau 1,078,870.0 1078.870 713.0 659,786 5,969,024 11

Bruderheim 1,176,870.7 1176.871 623.0 364,279 5,964,720 12

Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 20 II) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)


Page 19 of 62 Issue Date: August 23, 2011




3.2.2 Pump Plan

3.2.2.1 Crude Oil Pipeline

Phase I - Appl ication 525,000 bpd

Station Brake Horsepower

@ Design Rate

bh_ r--" I - - I

Pump Typ~ Pump Minimum Speed VFD

Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for infomlation only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by intemal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)





Phase IV - Ultimate 850,000 bpd


@ Design Rate

_I bhp . - - I . - -Pump Type

Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.

Minimum VFD

(A39833)





3.2.2.2 Condensate Pipeline

Phase I - Application 193,000 bpd


@ Design Rate

bh

-------• • • • • • •

-------

Pump Minimum Speed VFD


(A39833)






Phase III - Ultimate 275,000 bpd

Station

--• -• -• -• -• -• -• -• -• • • -- I - • -


Minimum VFD

(A39833)


3.2.3 Power




3.2.3.1 Crude Oil Pump Stations

The followin g table pro vides a su mmary of the pressure and power requirements of the oil pipeline at the init ial design capacity of 583 kbpd and the ultimate design capacity of 944 kbpd.

Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by intemal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)




Hydraulic Design Proposal Mainline


Conf igurat ion Name:E28-N00310-REVT-v1A-PH 1-Ann C:lse N:lme:525_TA_EA_FC

PR E SSUR E {P S I)

Rate OfoTime %Time Hold Suet Case Diso Station PUnlP rm'\ 3/dav) SIn PumD} Pres Pres Pres P res

BR 02745 100.00 75.00 75.00 2160.09 2 160.00

BR· l ·5750 92743 100.00 BR~2-5750 92743 100.00 BR-3-5750 n743 100.00 BR-4-5750 92743 100.00 BR-5-5750 n743 100.00 BR-6-5750 92743 100.00

OL 92745 0.00 107.35 1162.26 1162.2e 1162.26

OL"-5750 0 0.00

WC 92745 100.00 107.35 107.35 20 19.79 20 19 .78

WC- I-5750 92743 100.00 WC-2-5750 92743 100.00 WC-3-5750 ~274 J. ' 00.00 WC-4-5750 92743 100.00 WC-~5750 92743 100.00

Fe 92745 0.00 194;96 1131.64 1131.64 1131.64

FC-I -6750 0 0.00

SR 92745 100.00 194.96 194.96 21 18.75 2 11 8.75

SR- I-5750 Q2743 100.00 SR·2·575D 92743 100.00 SR-3-6750 92743 100.00 SR-4-575o 92743 100.00 SR-~575o 92743 '00.00

EW 92745 0.00 212.98 '071.01 107 1.0 ' '071.0 1

EW-I-57S0 0 0.00

TR 92745 ' 00.00 2 12.98 2 12.98 1250.09 1250.09

TR-I-5750 92743 100.00 TR-2-5750 Q2743 100.00 TR-3-5750 92743 100.00

BL 92745 100.00 344.4' 344.41 1438.21 1468.2 1

BL-I-5750 92743 lCO.CO BL-2-S750 92743 100.00 BL-3-6750 92743 10C.00

FJ 92745 100.00 485.4 1 485.4 1 ' 610.74 161 0.74

FJ- I-6750 92743 100.00 FJ-2-5750 9274:> 100.00 FJ -3-5750 92743 ' 00.00

BU 92745 100.00 565.27 565.27 1580.45 1580.45

BU-H i750 92743 100.00 BU-2-5750 ~2743 100.00 BU-3-5750 92743 100.00

RMO Pres

·0.09

Diff= 2085.0g

' 074.63

Diff;=O.OO

140.2 1

Oiff;= ' 912.44

965.43

Diff=O.OO

41.25

Oiff;= '923.79

96B.88

Diff;=O.OO

681.57

Diff;= 1037.1 1

633.89

Diff= 11 23_80

54(f.2e

Diff-:: 1125.34

110.55

Diff= 1015.17

Total: Throttle: Useful:

TOt31: Throttle: Useful:



Total: Throttle: Usefu l:

Total: Throttle_: Useful:

Total: Tluottle: Useful:

Total: Throttle: UsefuJ:

Total: Throttle- : Useful:

Tolal: Throttle: Useful:

PH 204: Hydraulic Horsepower Report Page 31 of 38

pow E R (H PI Avg Avg Peak Peak AVij % BHP HH P BHP HHP Eft RPM

27360 20745 27360 20745 0.758 1 0 1

27359 20744 27359 20744 2403 16 12 2493 16 12 0.647 75.23 4973 3826 4973 3826 0.769 100.00 4973 3826 4973 3826 0.769 100.00 4973 3826 4973 3826 0.769 100.00 4073 3826 4973 3826 0.769 100.00 4973 3826 4973 3826 0.769 100.00

0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00

24453 16094 24823 19281 0.777 0 0 0

24453 18004 24823 1928 1 4694 3649 5068 3Q35 0.778 97.80 4939 3836 4940 3836 0.777 100.00 4939 3836 4940 3836 0.777 100.00 4939 3836 4940 3836 0.777 100.00 4939 3836 4940 3836 0.777 '00.00

0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 0 .00

24602 191 10 24823 1928 1 0 .777 0 0 0

24602 19110 24823 1928 1 4845 3764 5068 3935 0.777 99.14 4939 3838 4940 3836 0.777 100.00 4939 3836 4940 3836 0.777 100.00 4939 3836 4940 3836 0.777 100.00 4939 3836 4940 3836 0.777 100.00

0 0 0 0 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00

13275 10304 13275 10304 0.776 0 0 0

13275 10304 13275 10304 3389 2634 3389 2634 0 .777 85.25 4943 3835 4943 3835 0.776 100.00 4943 3835 4943 3835 0 .776 100.00

14266 11174 14266 11174 0 .783 0 0 0

14266 111 74 14266 11174 4444 3486 4444 3486 0.784 95.80 4911 3844 4911 3844 0.783 100.00 4911 3844 49 11 3844 0.783 100.00

14266 11174 14266 1 11 74 0.783 0 0 0

14266 11174 14266 11174 4443 3485 4443 3486 0 .784 95.80 49 11 3844 4911 3344 0 .783 100.00 49 11 3844 49 11 3844 0.783 100.00

12934 10063 12934 10063 0 .778 0 0 0

12934 10063 12934 10063 3069 2387 3069 2387 0 .778 82.02 4932 3838 4932 3838 0 .778 '00.00 4932 3838 4932 3838 0 .778 '00.00

Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for info rmation only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)





Configuration Name:E28-N0031 O-REVT -v1 A-PH 1-Ann C;!se N3me:525_TA_EA_FD

PR E SSUREjPSI) Rate %i~~~~ r;D~~~~ Hold Suet Case Disc

St<ltion Pump I lm A 3ldav) Pres Pres Pres Pres

HU g2745. 0 .00 270.57 1137.21 1137.21 113721

HlJ-1-5750 0 0.00

OW Q2745 0.00 270.57 641.01 641.01 64 1.01

OW·l·575<1 0 0.00

RMD PrE's

682.13

Diff=O.OO

1781.47

Diff=O.OO

KM Q2745 0.00 270.57 270.57 270.57 1 Da.OO 99999832.00

[)iff: O.O~ KM- l 0 0.00

KM (Termi:nrJIl 270.57

Tat']l: Throttle: Us£oful:

TOI.lI: Th:rottle: Useful:

Tot-a!: Throttle : USEfu l:

PH 204: Hydraulic Horsepower Report P;!ge 32 of 38

PO"N E R (H P)

Avg Avg Peak Peak Avg % BHP HHP BHP HHP Eft RPM

0 0 0 0 0 .000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o.oon 0 .00

0 0 0 0 0 .000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 o.on 0 0 0 0 O.OOD

16P2 i 6"2 H3Q2 ·1692 · 1692 · len - l!592

0 0 0 0 0 .000 0.00

Note: This is a preliminruy DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) ruld has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)


Page 26 of 62 Issue Date: August 23, 2011




Configuration Name:E28-N00310-REVT-v2A-UL T-Ann Case Name:850_TA_EA_FD

P R E S SUR E (P S I) Rate %Time %Time Hold Suet Case Disc

Station Pump I (m '3Iday) (Stn) (Pump) Pres Pres Pres Pres

BR 150157 100.00 75.00 75.00 2 145.03 2 145.03

BR-1-5750 150 154 100.00 BR-2-!l750 150154 100.00 BR-3-!l750 150 154 100.00 BR-4-5750 150 154 100.00 BR-5-5750 150 154 100.00 BR-6-!l750 150 154 100.00 BR-7-5750 150 154 100.00 BR-8-5750 150 154 100.00 BR-9-5750 150 154 100.00

Ol 150 157 100.00 60·06 50.01t '2 152.00 2152.00

Ol-I-5750 150154 100.00 Ol-2-5750 150154 '100.00 Ol-:l-5750 150154 100.00 -

; .I~ OL-4-5750 150154 100.00 - .. -OL-5-5750 150154 100.00 OL-6-5750 150 154 100.00 OL-7-5750 150154 100.00 .. -OL-8-5750 150154 100.00 OL-rl-5750 150154 100.00

WC 150157 100.00 g9.65 99.65 1726.27 1726.27

WC-I -5750 150 154 100.00 WC-2-!i750 150 154 100.00 WC-3-5750 150 154 100.00 'lVC-4-5750 150 154 100.00 'lVC-!l-!l750 150 154 100.00 'lVC.(l-!l750 150 154 100.00 WC-7-5750 150154 100.00

FC 150157 100.00 116.33 116.33 2086.09 2086.09

FC-I-5750 150154 100.00 FC-2-5750 150154 100.00 FC-:l-5750 150154 100.00 FC-4-5750 150154 100.00 FC-5-5750 150154 100.00 FC- 6-5750 150154 100.00 FC-7-5750 150 154 100.00 FC' B-5750 150154 100.00

SR 150157 100.00 253.33 253.33 1978.45 1978045

SR-1-5750 150154 100.00 SR-2-5750 150 154 100.00 SR-3-5750 150154 100.00 S R-4-5750 150154 100.00 SR-5-!l750 150154 100.00 SR-1l-5750 150154 100.00 SR-7-5750 150154 100.00

EW 150157 100.00 113.44 113.44 1838.40 1838.40

EW-I-5750 150 154 100.0 0 EW-2-5750 150154 100.00 EW-3-575o 150154 100.00 EW-4-5750 150154 100.00 EW-5'5750 150154 ~ 100.00 EW-1l-5750 150154 100.00

_~~~EW-7-5L5.0 15_0154 1.0_0.,0.0_ .

RMD Pres

14.97 Tota l: Throttle:

Diff= 2070.03 Useful:

8.00 Total: Throttle:

Oiff= 2091.94 Useful:

~





181.55 Total: ThrotUe:

Diff=: 1725. 12 Useful:

194.Bo To!.>l: Throttle;


GE

PH 204: Hydraulic Horsepower Report Page 33 of 41

POW ER(H P) Avg Avg Peak Peak Avg % BHP HHP BHP HHP Eft RPM

42317 33389 42317 33389 0.789 0 0 0

42317 33389 42317 33389 2918 2192 29 18 2 1"2 0.751 83.05 4924 3899 4924 3899 0.792 100.00 4924 3S99 4924 3899 0.792 100.00 4924 3899 4n4 3899 0.792 100.00 4924 3899 4924 3899 0.792 100.00 4924 3899 4924 3899 0.792 100.00 4924 3899 4924 3899 0.792 100.00 4924 3899 4924 3899 0.792 100.00 4924 3899 4924 3899 0.792 100.00

41408 33744 4 1406 33744 0.815 0 0 0

4 1408 33744 4 1406 33744 2877 2240 2877 2240 0.779 83.19 4818 3937 4818 3937 0.818 100.00 4618 3937 4816 3937 0.B1B 100.00 4B16 3937 4B16 3937 0.B1B 100.00 48 18 3937 4816 3937 0.8 18 100.00 4616 3937 4816 3937 0.81 B 100.00 481 6 3937 4816 3937 0.8 18 100.00 48 18 3937 4B 16 3937 0.81 8 100.00 48 16 3937 4B1 6 3937 0.81 B 100.00

3158B 26236 31588 26236 0.83 1 0 0 0

31588 28238 31588 26236 3112 2514 3112 2514 0.B08 85.79 4745 3953 4745 3953 0.833 100.00 4745 3953 4745 3953 0.833 100.00 4745 3953 4745 3953 0.833 100.00 4745 3953 4745 3953 0.833 100.00 4745 3953 4745 3953 0.833 100.00 4745 3953 4745 3953 0.833 100.00

37684 31668 37684 3 1868 0.840 0 0 0

37684 31668 37684 3 1868 4706 3954 4706 3954 0.840 99.96 4711 3959 4711 3959 0.840 100.00 471 ' 3959 4711 3959 0.840 100.00 4711 3959 4711 3959 0.840 100.00 47 11 3959 4711 3959 0.840 100.00 47 11 3959 47 11 3959 0.840 100.00 47 11 3959 4711 3959 0.840 100.00 4711 3959 4711 3959 0.840 100.00

32876 27725 32B76 27725 0.843 0 0 0

32876 27725 32B76 27725 4898 3geO 4696 3960 0.843 100.00 4696 3960 4696 3960 0.843 100.00 4696 3960 4896 3980 0.543 100.00 4696 3960 4696 3960 0.843 100.00 4696 3980 4696 3980 0.843 100.00 4696 3980 4698 3960 0.843 100.00 4696 3960 4696 3960 0.843 100.00

-32774 27726 32774 27726 0.846 0 0 0

32774 27726 32774 27726 4672 3953 4672 3953 0.846 99.92 4683 3962 4883 3962 0.846 100,00 4683 - '3962 4683 3962 0.846 100.00 4683 3962 4683 3962 -0.846 100:00 4683 3g62 4683 3982 0.848 100.00 4683 3982 4683 3982 0.846 100.00 46_8_3~~3_9_6_2 __ 46~_3~_3_962 ~_0._8.'1ll~~_10_0"OO_

Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3 .6 dated August 23, 201 1) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)





Configuration Name:E28-N00310-REVT-v2A-UL T-Ann Case Name:850_TA_EA_FD

P RE S SUR E (P S I) Rat. %Time %Time Hold Suet Case Disc RMD

Station Pump m A3ld.y} (Stn) (Pump) Pres Pres Pres Pres Pres

TR 150 157 100.00 3 19.33 319.33 1910.33 191 0.33 5 1.99

Diff= 1591.00 TR- I-5750 150 154 100.00 TR-2-5750 150154 100.00 TR-3-5750 150154 100.00 TR-4-5750 150 154 100.00 TR-5-5750 150154 100.00 TR-6-5750 150154 100.00 TR-7-5750 150154 100.00

BL 150157 100.00 191.38 191.38 1913.41 1913.41 226.33

Diff= 1722.03 BL-I-S750 150154 100.00 BL-2-5750 150154 100.00 BL-3-5750 150154 100.00 BL-4-5750 150154 100.00 BL-5-5750 150154 100.00 BL-6-5750 150154 100.00 BL-7-5750 1501'54 100.00

FJ 150157 100.00 186. 10 186. 10 2160.07 2 160.00 -0.07

Diff= 1973.97 FJ- I-5750 150154 100.00 FJ-2-5750 150154 100.00 FJ-3-5750 150 154 100.00 FJ-4-5750 150154 100.00 FJ-5-5750 150154 100.00 FJ--6·575<Q 150154 100.00 FJ-7-575iJ 150154 100.00 FJ-8-5750 150 154 100.00

BU 150157 100.00 453.71 453.71 1687.56 18B7.56 38.30

Diff= 1233.85 BU-I -575<Q 150154 100.00 BU-2-5750 150154 100.00 BU-3-5750 150154 100.00 BU-4-5750 150154 100.00 BU-5-6750 150154 100.00

HLJ 150157 100.00 752.48 752.49 168 1.36 168 1.36 142.25

Diff= 928.88 HU-I-5750 1501 54 100.00 HU-2-5750 150 154 100.00 HU-3-5750 150 154 100.00 HU-4-5750 150154 100.00

CW 150157 100.00 383.97 383.97 838.37 838.37 1321.63

Diff= 454.41 CW-I -5750 150154 100.00 CW-2-5750 150154 100.00

KM 150157 0.00 148.36 148.36 148.36 100.0099999952.00

Diff= 0.00 KM- l 0 0.00

KM K ennina.l 148.36







Tota l: Throttle: Useful:

PH 204: Hydrau lic Horsepower Report Page 34 of 41

POWER(HP} Avg Avg Peak Peak Avg % BHP HHP BHP HHP Elf RPM

30642 25707 30642 25797 0.842 0 0 0

30642 25797 30642 25707 2552 2022 2552 2022 0.792 80.84 4681 3962 468 1 3062 0.846 100.00 468 1 3062 4681 3062 0.846 100.00 4681 3062 4681 3062 0.846 100 .00 4681 3062 4681 3962 0.846 100.00 4681 3962 4681 3962 0.846 100.00 4681 3962 4681 3962 0.846 100.00

32563 27703 32563 27703 0.85 1 0 0 0

32563 27703 32563 27703 4606 3917 4606 39 17 0.85 1 99.59 4650 3964 4659 3964 0.85 1 100.00 4650 3964 4659 3964 0.85 1 100.00 4659 3964 4659 3964 0.85 1 100.00 4659 3964 4659 3964 0.85 1 100.00 4659 3964 4659 3964 0.85 1 100.00 4659 3964 4659 3964 0.85 1 100.00

37167 3 1720 37 167 3 1720 0.853 1 1 I

37165 317 19 371 65 317 19 4645 3964 4645 3964 0.853 100.00 4645 3965 4645 3965 0.853 100.00 4845 3965 4845 3965 0.853 100.00 4645 3065 4645 3965 0.853 100.00 4645 3Q65 4645 3965 0.853 100.00 4645 3965 4645 3965 0.853 100.00 4645 3965 4645 3965 0.853 100.00 4645 3965 4645 3965 0.853 100.00

23229 19825 23229 19825 0.853 0 0 0

23229 19825 23229 19825 4645 3965 4645 3965 0.853 100.00 4645 3965 4645 3965 0.853 100.00 4645 3965 4645 3965 0.853 100.00 4645 3965 4645 3965 0.853 100.00 4645 3965 4645 3965 0.853 100.00

17537 1494 1 17537 1494 1 0.852 0 0 0

17537 14941 17537 1494 1 3594 3046 3594 3046 0.847 9 1.53 4847 3965 4647 3965 0.853 100.00 4647 3965 4647 3965 0.853 100.00 4647 3965 4647 3965 0.853 100.00

8580 7329 8580 7329 0.854 0 0 0

8580 7329 8580 7329 3945 3363 3945 3363 0.853 94.58 4634 3965 4634 3965 0.856 100.00

0 0 0 0 0.000 776 776 776

-776 -776 -776 -776 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00


(A39833)

Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09 BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING Rev. 3.6

Hydraulic Design Proposal Page 28 of62 Issue Date: August 23,2011 Mainline


3.2.3.2 Condensate Pump Stations

The followin g table provides a summary of the pressure a nd power requirements of the cond ensate pipeline at the initial design capacity of 214 kbpd and the ultimate design capacity of 306 kbpd.

Configuration Name:E29-N0031 O-REVT -v1 A-PH 1-Ann PH 204: Hydraulic Horsepower Report Case Name:193_TA_EA]D Page 24 of 34

PRE S SUR E (P S I) P OWER(H P}

m"'3/~:~; '!.I~~n} (~J~) Hold Suet Case Disc RMD Avg Avg Peak Puk Avg yJ Station Pump Pres Prl!S PreS Pres Pres BHP HHP BHP HHP Eft RPM

KM 34095 100.00 75.00 75.00 590.55 590.55 997.9(} Total: 2257 1880 2257 1880 0.833 Throttle: 0 0 0

Diff= 515.55 Useful: 2257 lB80 2257 1880 KM·' 34094 100.00 2257 lsaO 2257 1880 0.833 78 ,97 KM-2 0 a.{)O 0 0 0 0 0 .000 0 .00

CW 340g5 100.00 23tHIS 236.95 1682.9a 1682.98 0.02 Total: 6744 5277 6744 5277 0.782 Throttle: 0 0 0

Diff= 1446.03 UseflJl: 6744 6277 6744 5277 CW-1 340g4 100.00 2627 2155 2627 2155 0 .820 64,23 CW-2 34004 100.00 4117 312 1 4117 3121 0.758 100.00

NB 34095 0.00 435.00 797.34 797.34 707.34 470.28 Tot.!! l: 0 0.000 Throttle: 0

Diff= 0.00 Useful: 0 0 NB·l 0.00 0 0 0 .000 0.00

HU 340115 100.00 435.00 4315.90 1140.25 1146.25 252.75 Total: 326g 259 1 3270 2592 0.793 Throttle: 0 0 0

Diff= 710.35 Useful: 326g 25g 1 3270 2592 HU-l 340114 100.00 3269 2591 3270 2592 0.793 92.06 HU-2 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 .000 0.00

BU 34095 100.00 507.28 507.28 1180.S0 1180.S9 212. 11 Tot.11: 3060 2457 3106 2481 0.801 Throttle: 0 0 0

Oiff= 673.61 Useful: 3069 2457 3106 2481 BU- l 34094 100.00 3069 2457 3 106 2481 0.801 89 .74 BU-2 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00

X, 341X1!5 (LOD 69S.69 636.4 1 636.41 636.41 609.31 TOt31: 0.000 Throttle:

Diff= 0.00 Useful: 0.000 XI-I 0.00 0.00

FJ 34095 100.00 ege.e9 696.69 1387.17 1367.17 240.83 Tot.)l: 316 1 2519 3 192 2539 0.797 Throttle: 0 0 0

Oiff=: 690.46 Useful: 31 0 1 2~19 31Q2 2539 FJ- l 34094 100.00 31 6 1 2519 3192 2539 0.797 9o.a2 FJ-2 0 0 .00 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00

Bl 34095 100.00 709.84 70Q.84 1416.81 1416.81 246.39 Total: 3251 2579 3270 2591 0.793 Throttle: 0 0 0

DifF 706.97 Useful: 3251 21579 3270 2591 BL-I 34094 100.00 3251 2579 3270 2591 0.793 9 1.65 Bl-2 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 .00

IX2 34095 0.00 553.47 1114.39 1114.39 1114.39 285.61 Total: 0.000 Throttle:

I Oiff= 0.00 Useful:

)(2-1 0 .00 0.000 0.00

ITR 34095 100.00 553.47 553.47 1224.50 1224.50 148.15 TObl: 3055 2448 3072 2459 0.80 1 Throttle: 0 0 0

Oiff= 671.03 Useful: 3055 2448 3072 2459 TR-1 34094 100.00 3055 2448 3072 2450 0.S01 89.58 TR-2 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 .000 0.00

EW 34005 0 .00 4Q.Q3 651.77 6S1.n 651 .77 876.76 Total: 0.000 Throttle:

Oifi: 0.00 Useful: EW-1 0.00 0 .000 0.00

SR 341XJ5 100.00 49.{j3 40.g3 1285.78 1285.78 358.22 Tot.!! l: 6750 4511 5861 4506 0.783 Throttle: 0 0 0

Dif'f: 1235.85 Useful: 5759 4511 5861 4506 SR.1 34004 100.00 " 1640 1390 1741 1474 0.S48 68.02 SR-2 34094 100.00 4119 ' 3121 4119 3121 0 .758 100.00

FC 3409S 0.00 95.S1 495.24 495.24 495.24 904 .70 Tot.11: 0 0 0.000 Throttle: 0 0

Diff=: 0.00 Useful: 0 0 Fe- , 0.00 0 0 0 .000 0 .00


(A39833)





Configuration Name:E29-N0031 O-REVT -v1A-PH 1-Ann Case Name: 193_TA_EA_FD

PRE S SUR E (P S II

l(m'31~~~ %I~':'n; (~Tim. Hold Suet Case Disc. Station Pump Pump) Pres Pre-s Pres Pres

we 340Q5 UHLO[} fl5.B l ~5.81 1225.66 1225.66

WC-l 34oij4 100.00 WC-2 340Q4 100.00

OL 34oQ5 0.00 100.13 653.81 653.81 653.81

OL-l 0.00

RMD Pres

40(;.34

Oiff= 1120.04

746.19

Oiff=O.O~

9il 34095 0.00 100.13 100. 13 100. 13 100.00 00000000.00

Oift=O.O[} eR·l 0.00

BR (Termin.l) 100.13

To~l: Throttle: Useful:

Total: Thrat1le: Useful:

Total : Throttle: Useful:

PH 204: Hydraulic Horsepower Report P.lge 25 of 34

POW ER (H P) Avg Avg Peak Peak Avg '10 BHP HHP BHP HHP Eft RPM

5303 4 122 5305 4124 O.n7 0 0 0

5303 ';122 5305 4124 1184 1001 1186 1002 0.845 60.54 41 1 ~ 3121 41H} 3121 0 .i58 100.00

0.000

0.000 0.00

0.000

0.000 0.00


(A39833)


Page 30 of 62 Issue Date: August 23 , 2011




Configuration Name:E29-N0031 O-REVT -v2A-UL T-Ann C3se Name:275_TA_EA_FD

P R E S SU R E (P S I)

l (mA31~!~ %I;;;'i [~nme Hold Suet Case Disc RMD Statio n Pump Pump) Pre. Pres Pres Pres Pres

Kid 48581 100.00 75.00 75.00 690.47 690.47 9 11.53

Difr-o 6 15.47 KM-l 48580 100.00 KM-2 0 0.00

CW 48581 100.00 50.06 50.06 1666.08 1666.08 42.92

. Dift= 1616.02 CW-l 48580 100.00 CW-2 48580 100.00

N8 4858 1 100.00 510.18 5 10.18 1058. 19 1058.19 212.77

Diff= 548.0 1 NB- l 48580 100.00 NB-2 0 0.00

HI) 48581 100.00 237.36 237.36 1399.09 13911.00 -0.00

Dift= 1161.73 HU- l 48580 100.00 HUC2 48580 100.00

BU 4858 1 100.00 3 11.53 31 1.53 l11B.96 1118.96 275.04

DifF 807.43 8 U- l 48~80 100.00 BU-2 0 0.00

Xl 4858 1 100.00 307.14 307.14 11 14.1IIl 1114.99 118.0 1

Diff= 807.85 Xl -1 48580 10.0.00 X1-2 0 0.00

FJ 4858 1 100.00 852.59 852.50 1585.66 1585.66 49.34

Diff= 733.0.7 FJ- l 485BO 100.00 FJ-2 0 0.00

Bl 4858 1 100.00 257.39 257.39 1658.08 1658.00 -0.0.8 I~

Diff= 1400.69 8l-1 48580 100.00 Bl -2 48580 100.00

X2 48581 100.00 974.43 974.43 1399.0B 1399.00 -0.08

Diff= 424.65 X2- 1 48580 100.00. )(2-2 0 0.00

T~ 4858 1 100.00 519.00. 519.00 1223,54 1223.54 149.46

-- Difr-0704.53 TR-l 48580 100.00 TR-2 0 0.00

EW 485Bl 100.0.0 100.3 1 100.3 1 14 72.7e 1472.76 88.24

Diff= 1372.45 EW-l 48580 100.00 EW-2 48580 100.00

-SR · 48581 100.00 237.72 237.72 1654.09 .1!l54.00 -0.09

- Dift= 1416.36 · S R- l - 4 8580. 100.00 SR-2 "'l'-'''' 48580. 100.00 ~-~ ~ ~ !""::,,':-,

SR-3 0 0:00


Toul: Throttle: Useful:




T01.1: Throttle: Useful:

Tot.31: Throttle: Useful:



Total: Throttle: _ Usefuf:


Toul: Throttte: Useful:

PH 204: Hydraulic Horsepower Report P3ge 24 of 32

pow ER(H P) Avg Avg Peak Peak Avg % 8HP HHP 8HP HHP Elf RPM

3774 3 199 3774 3199 0.848 0 0 0

3774 3 199 3774 3199 3774 3 199 3774 3199 0.848 89.60

0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00

9904 8400 9904 8400 0.848 0 0 0

9904 8400 9904 8400 4951 4 199 4951 4199 0.848 99.99 4952 4200 4952 4200 0.848 100.00

3369 2848 3369 2B48 0.845 0 0 0

3369 2B48 3369 284B 3369 2648 3369 2848 0.845 85.75

0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00

7 194 606 1 7194 6061 0.842 0 0 0

7 194 606 1 7194 6061 2242 1660 2242 1660 0.830· 73.73 4952 4200 4952 4200 0.848 100.00

4947 4 197 4947 4197 0.848 0 0 0

4947 4 197 4947 4197 4947 4 197 4947 4197 0.848 99.96

0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00

4950 4199 4950 4 190 0.848 0 0 0

4950 4199 4950 4199 4950 4199 4950 4190 0.B48 09.99

o · 0 0 0 0.000 0.00

4492 3Bl0 44Q2 3B l 0 0.B48 0 0 0

4492 3810 4492 3810. 4492 3B l 0 4492 38 10 0.848 96.09

0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00

8597 7293 8597 7293 0.B48 0 0 0

B596 7293 B596 7293 3645 3092 3645 3092 0.B48 88.39 4951 4200. 4951 4200 0.848 100.00

2639 2207 2639 2207 0.836 0 0 0

2639 2207 2639 2207 2639 220.7 2639 2207 0.B36 78.21

0 0 0 0 0.0.00 0.00

43 16 3662 4316 3662 0.848 0 0 0

4316 · 3662 4316 il!O 3662 43 16 3682 4316 3662 ·0.84B 94.5B

c O 0 0 ~-- ·0 0.000· 0.00

B444 7 157 B455 7167 0.848 0 0 0

8444 7 157 8455 7167 3492 2956 3503 2966 0.847 86.92 4952 4200 4952 4200 0.84B 100.00

86Q7 7377 c8703 · 7382 0.848 0 0 " 0

8696 7377 8702 7382 3744 3 176 375 1 -, 3181 0.848 89.35 4952 4200 4952 4200 0.848 100.00

0 0 0 0 0.000 0.00

Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3 .6 dated Angust 23, 2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)





Configurati.on Name:E29-N0031 O-REVT -v2A-UL T -Ann C<lse N<lme:275_TA_EA]D

PRE S SUR E (P S II

(mA31~~~'; %nrni (~J:i Hold Suet Case Disc RMD Station Pump Pres Pres Pres Pres Pres

rC 48&8 1 1 0~.00 181.24 181.24 9:>8.15 Q38.15 456.85-

Oiff= 756.91 FC-l 48580 100.1l0 FC-2 0 0.00

WC 48M I I IlO.OO 50.09 50.00 164,Ulll 1648.0!) -O.O~

Diff= 1597.97 we-l 485-80 100.00 WC-2 48580 100.00

OL 48591 100.00 500.33 5-DO.3S 1272.3-6 1272.36 122.64

Diff= 772.03 OL-l 48580 10().OO OL-Z 0 I}.OO

BR 48581 0.01} 100.06 100.06 100.1l6 100.000000[1000.01}

Oili: 0.00 8R-1 0 0.00 8R-2 0 0.00

BR (Terminal} 100.1l6

3.2.4 Variable Frequency Drive (VFD)

To!.sl: Throttle: Us .. !ul:

TOtal: Throttle: lJse!ul:

To:~I: Throtle: Uselul:

Tobl: Thronle: Uselut

PH 204: Hydraulic Horsepower Report P<lge 25 of 32

pow ER(H P) Avg Avg Peak Peak AV[J RP~I BHP HHP BHP HHP Elf

4"39 3934 4639: 3934 0.848 I Q 0 0

453Q 3934 463S 3lJ34 4639 3934 ~63G' 3934 0.848 97.34

I) 0 G I} 0.000 0.00

9S03 83 14 9803 8314 0.848 0 0 (I

9a03 8314 9803 B314 4850 41 13 4ll5D 4113 0.848 -g9.13 49S3 420() 4953 4200 0.848 100.00

4731 4() 13 4731 40 13 0.848 G 0 0

4731 40 13 473 1 40 13 473 1 4D l 3 4731 4013 0.848 98.13

I} Q I} I} D.Q{)O 0.00

0 (} () 0 0.000 0 [} I} () 0 0 0 [) 0 0 0 0.000 0.00 () (} (} 0 D.1l00 0.00

Since both the oil and the diluent pipelines are large diameter pipelin es with relatively large motor sizes, BDE Hydra ulics recommends the use of a Variable Frequency Drive (VFO) to enhance operability and reduce pressure throttling.


(A39833)





3.2.5 Case Pressure Limits


?J N RIDGE

For crude oil pipeline pump stations, all the st ation piping will be designed to PN 150 (ANSI 900) class resulting in a case pressure limit of 2160 psig for all pump stations. To maintain maximum operational flexibility, it is recommended that all the station piping be hydro-tested to the full ANSI 900 (2160 psig) rating


For condensate pipelin e pump stat ions, Clearwater, Fort St. James, Be ar Lake, Smoky River, and Whitecourt will be designed to PN 150 (ANSI 900) cia ss resulting in a case pressure limit of 2160 psig for these 5 stations. All the other stations will be designed to PN 100 (ANSI 600) class resulting in a case pressure limit of 1440 psig.


(A39833)





3.2.6 Pump Standby

The current Enbridge standby philosophy is to ensure that when the largest unit at a pump station is out of service, the pipeline can still achieve operating capacity (95 % of design capacity). A sta ndby analysis was com pleted to en sure the pro posed desig n for the NGP meets the above criteria. The results are summarized in this section.


Note: This is a preliminalY DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for infollllation only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)






• • • • • • • • • • •

~ ENBRIDGE

Note: This is a preliminruy DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for infonnation only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)





3.3 Operational Limitations and Concerns

3.3.1 Petroleum Quality and Batching The oil and condensate pipelines were hydraulically designed based on a single product for each pipeline. During detailed engineerin g, the final hydraulic design for t he oil pipeline will incorporate the additional lighter oil products anticipated to be transported in batches, a nd this will re suit in revis ions to the design pressures and wa II th icknesses at some specific locations along the pipel ine.

3.3.2 Minimum Reynolds Number

The table below summarizes the range of the Reynolds number in any crude oil pipeline and condensate pipeline at in itial and ultimate flow rates. It can be seen that the flow regime is fully turbulent in both system at the target flow rates.

Pipeline Phase Design Flow Rate (bpd) Reynold's Number

I 583,333 4,531 - 5,395 Oil

IV 944,444 9,763 - 25,082

I 214,111 803,725 - 824,213 Condensate

III 305, 556 1,179,335 - 1,240,192

3.3.3 Maximum Mainline Fluid Velocities

The maxi mum fluid velocity in the crude oil pipel ine is 9.5 ftlsec ba sed on the ultimate phase targe t design ca pacity of 944,444 bpd. The ma ximum fluid velocity in the condensate pipeline is 9 .7 ftlsec based on the ultimate phase target design capacity of 305,556 bpd. These values are within the typical flu id velocities found acceptable on the Enbridge System.

Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for infonnation only. It has not undergone a rigorous rev iew by internal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)






3.3.4 Operating Limits

-etNBRIDGE

Operating limits were critical due to the significant elevation changes along the route.



(A39833)





Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for infomlation only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by intemal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)







(A39833)

Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09 Rev. 3.6 Page 39 of62 Issue Date: August 23 , 201 1




3.4 Pipeline Thermal Analysis

3.4.1 Annual Average Temperature Profile

The followin g profiles contain a summary of the average station in let and outlet in-line temperature under annual average conditions. These are the thermal conditions used in the hydraulic design capacity and pressure loss calculations.

Note: This is a preliminruy DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)

Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09 Rev. 3.6 £) Page 40 of62 Issue Date: August 23,2011


Hydraulic Design Proposal -Mainline ENBRIDGE



Phase I - Application 525 kbpd Annual

85 .•

80 .•

75.0

70.0

65 .•

60 .•

55 .•

so .•

<15.0

..

l <i ti ~

Conflg: E28-SE2109-REVRLF-A/'IEC Case: 583kbpd_DesI(11 Thermal Profile

Profile of temperalJJe vs Milepost

Phase IV - Ultimate 850 kbpd Annual

00.

95 .•

').0

85 .•

80 .•

.> ~

Conflg: E28-SE2109-REVRHF-AMEC Case: 944kbpd_Design Thermal Profile

Profile of temperature vs Milepost

ill ~ :" ~

-<""")

~ " ~ ~

Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3 .6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for infonnation only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.

~ ~

(A39833)







Phase 1- Application 193 kbpd Annual

o.

65.0

60.0

55.0

I SO.O

i '15.0

~ 40.0

35.0

l ~ !! '2 ~ ;..;;: ~

Conflg: E29-AU1009-DL-REVR ease: 214kbpd_deslgo Thermal Profile

Profile of temperature vs Milepost

~ ;j

'" i!i

Phase III - Ultimate 275 kbpd Annual

o.

65.0

60.0

55 .0

SO.O

15.0

40.0

35.0

0.0

l ~ ~ '2 ~ x ~

Config: E29-AU1009-DL -REVR case: 306kbpd_design Thermal Profile

Profile of temperabJre \IS Milepost

= !l " i1;

r1iepost(o*s)

~

iii

Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3 .6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for infon11ation only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)





3.4.2 Maximum Temperature Analysis

I ~ &

!

3.4.2.1 Baseline

Phase I - Application 525 kbpd Annual

"'.0

as.O

00.0

75.0

70.0

$ .0

O.

l <>

" ~ :t '

Conflg: E28-SE2109-REVRLF-38Clnj case: max_temp_Q3 Thermal Profi Ie

Profile of temperalLre vs Milepost

iii ~ !! 0

r.uepost(mles)

Note: This is a preliminruy DRAFT (v3 .6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for infonnation only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)

Doc. No: BDE-QF- 09 Rev. 3.6 Page 43 of 62 Issue Date: August 23 , 20 11




Phase IV - Ultimate 850 kbpd Annual

'''. 125.0

120.0

115.0

110.0

IOS.0

100.0

95.0

90.0

65.0

9.6

~ " ~ Ii'

~

Config: E28-SE2109-REVRHF-38Cinj Case: maJ,-Temp_Q3 Thermal Profile

Profile of temperabJre vs Milepost

'" ~ '" c

r'li!e~t(miles)

:c " "

The temperature profi le shown above indicates that the maximu m in-line temperatures between Bruderheim and Kitimat range from between 19.3°C (66.8°F) and 39.SoC (103.1°F) at the Pha se I flow rate; 38.1 °C (100.S0F) and 40.9°C (1 os. rF) at the ultimate flow rate. These in-line temperatures are well within the desig n limitation of the pipeline SO.O°C (122.0°F).

3.4.2.2 Sensitivity Study

There is so me uncertainty in some of the thermal assumptions u sed in determinin g the baseline thermal profile shown above, specifica lIy soil prop erties (ther mal conduct ivity and temperature). Th erefore a sensitivity analysis was conducted around th ese parameters to determine the range of potential maximum in-line temperatures that could be seen.

Sensitivity Assumptions:

• Summer soil thermal conductivity -lower by 30% from the values in AMEC report (200S) based on previous project experience.

• Summer soil temperatures - 10°C (SO°F) based on preliminary reCD mmendations provided by Derick Nixon (2008).

The in-line temperature profiles of the above two sensitivity runs are presented in the graph below, together with the baseline profile for the purpose of comparison.

Note: This is a preliminaIY DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 20 II) aIld has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)




~ ENBRIDGE


Dilbit Line Maximum In-line Temperature Sensitivity - Phase IV Fllow

- Baseline - 70%Conductivity - 50FG round

125 -,-------------------------------,- 51.7

LL.. 120 48 .9 U 0.0 <1.1

OJ 115

0.0 <1.1

OJ 46 .1 -

<1.1 ... :::I .... til 110 ... ----~ ---- -- - -. - - --- ---- - -- - - - --- - --- - ------- --- - - - -- - - - --------- - _.- ----.---- ---- --- ----------- -----<1.1 Co

43.3

<1.1 ... :::I ..... til ... <1.1 Co

E <1.1 105 l-

E 40.5 ~

E :::I

100 E 37.8 'x til

~ 95 35 .0

90

o 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750

Milepost

The results show that th e maximu m temperatures are arou nd 40.0°C (1 04.0°F) in most cases. However, it can get close to 50.0°C (122.0°F) when the soil co nductivity is 30 % lower than the AMEC re port values, It is recom mended that an addition al soil sampling program be conducted at the commencement of detailed engineering.


E :::I

E 'x til

~

(A39833)





4 Transient Analysis A preliminary transient analysis ha s been conducted for both the crude oil pipelin e and the condensate pipeline systems

4.1 Crude Oil Pipeline System Thirty-eight (38) scenarios in tota I were ex ami ned for the oil pipeline system at the ultimate flo w rate. The transient scenarios examined include sudde n and unplanned pressure co ntrol valve (peV) closure (95% at intermediate stations, 1 00% at delivery locations), station suction valve closing, and station lockout.

The transie nt study resulted maxi mum pressure profiles of all scenario s, as well as the steady-state pressure profile are sho wn in the figure below. I t can be seen that the wall thickness design is adequate as the maxi mum pressure profile of all scenarios is under the 110% MOP limit.

Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for infomlation only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)





NGP Oil Pipeline Maximum Pressure Profile - All Scenarios --Min MOP -- 110% Mill MOP --Maximum Pressure - - Steady State --Wa ll Thickness

2800 I 2.8

2400 h n r=n II fl n n n n n I 2.4

2000 ~. I. \ L--...JA~ R-I-r=-,.,I . -, ~ r1" rf Ir L.J L......J L'I-lt-n'Hl-I~HI n I F I I r -1- 1-1--+ 2

1.6 bii 1600 I • I • '" ~ PJ '. IN\ • fI : l 'I, IV~" H IlfIl--:rI~HIA j I • rIllU--+-lfIIH h ~ I I ~,----+ ~ ,

c. Q)

5 V> VI

~ 1200 I W • 11 't I ';1. • ,V,' "'.11. n.H--f V'4lR----..I-----+ 1.2

800 _ L.!

0.8 , , , , 1\ I , 400 I \1

,'1 , \ , tI h, ,,' i

' .. ~ 1~1

I

BR OL we Fe SR o .

I, , _'I ,

. . ~r '/ • \ I 0.4 Ii • ..

11 , f 1 I,

~ I ~ '/.' ''I ~ I I

, 'FJ • EW TR BL BU HU ew oKI,,1

I 0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750

Milepost

Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for information only_ It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.

:c-u :§. V> VI Q) I: .¥ .~ ..c: l-

n; $:

(A39833)





4.2 Condensate Pipeline System Thirty (30) scenarios in total were examined for the condensate pipel in e system at the ultimate flo w rate. The transient scenarios examined include sudde n and unplanned pressure co ntrol valve (peV) closure (95% at intermediate stations, 1 00% at del ivery locations) and station lockout.

The transient study resulted maxi mum pressure profi les of all scenario s, as well as the steady-state pressure profile are shown in the figure below. I t can be seen that the wall thickness design is adequate as the maxi mum pressure profi le of all scenarios is under the 110% MOP limit.

Note: This is a prel iminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 201 1) and has been issued for infomlation only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by intemal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)





NGP Condensate Pipeline Maximum Pressure Profile - All Scenarios -- Min MOP -- 110% Min MOP --Maximum PressLI,'e - - Steady Stete - Wall Thickness

2000 2.800

2.400

2.000 ,\ 1 1 :;:-

u 1.600 :§.

_ 1200

.2P III C.

Q)

:5 III III Q) ... 0-

800

\ \

400 I 1 I ~. "PI _ , .. If ',. _. I r? I I I' I I' \ 0'" ." I I \

'1 if II

'I I \I I

'

H1r OL BU Xl r I BL X2 TR EW SR o I

KM NB

o 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700

Milepost

, ~

III III Q) C

..):: u :E

1.200 ~ ro $

0.800

0.400

BR , 0.000

750

Note: Tllis is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)





5 Risk Management The followin 9 section 0 utlines the risks identified by the hydraul ics gro up that wi ll need to be addressed prior to project execution.

5.1 Risk Register

Assumption/ Risk Probability Impact Mitigati n Strategy Description

(High/ Low/Medium)

The proposed desig n of the High Operating limit and h ydrau lic Conduct ope rating limit and hydraulic crude oil pipelin e is based on results w ill change. Batch modeling for Linefill w ith heavy an d single product (a II heavy). The pigging w ill need to be lights. Incorporate light products in line w ould be ver y likely considered. hydraulic design s and adjust pipeline shipping multiple products design pressures and wall thickness (heavy and light) in batches. where required. Model batch pig .

Parallel pump alignment Medium Re-selection of new pump and Work with Eng ineering Services to motor units optimize pump plan. To be reviewed

by affected groups.

ORA ma y be u sed to reduce Medium Number of stati ons w ill reduce. Should ORA usage be considered, a the number of stations on the Pressu re profile along the line review of the h ydraulic design w ould condensate line at Phase III. will change. necessary.

Initial oil pipe line th roug hput High Low fluid vela city and small Conduct hydraulic analysis on low flow may be low. Reynolds num ber. Ma y be rate. Identif y th e flow pattern a nd the

operating in laminar flo w, requirements of batch pigging. causing quality problem.

Soil properties a long the right- High If actual soil conductivity is A sensitiv ity analysis in ter ms of the of-way a re based on AMEC higher than pred icted, there will soi l conduct ivity was conducted. It is desktop report. Discrepancies be risk of not making the target recommended t hat an addition al soi l with actual values ar e capacity; if the actual is lower sampling program be conducted at the expected. than predicted value, in-line commencement of detailed

temperature will increase. engineering.

Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3 .6 dated August 23, 2011) and has been issued for inforn1ation only. It has not undergone a rigorous rev iew by internal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)





Appendix A: Product Specification

?J EN RIDGE

The tables below present the specification of crude oi l and condensate products.

Configuration Name: E28-7F 5-S E 1808-REVPLFTR Case Name:58J_kbpd_deslgn_w_BU_AT_AMEC

Temperature 1

Descri tion T e Fahr. Cel.

Configuration Name:E29-4A-AUG2108-DL Case Name:214_khpd

Descri tion

COND

40 F (4.44 C) Visco cSt

1.276

T e

Conv. Factor

silfi 0.321 4

Temperature 1

'Fahr. Cel. 50.0 "10.0

Visco cSt

350.000

Temperature 2

Fahr. Cel.

70.0 21.'1

T empemture 2

Fahr. Cel. 64.9 18.3

Visco cSt

'177 .. 100

PH 102: Fluid Report Page 5 of 67

Vapor Pressure

S .Grav. si

PH 102: Fluid Output Report

PH 102: Fluid Report Poge 5 0150

PH 102: Fluid Output Report

Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23, 20 II) and has been issued for infomlation only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by intemal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)





Appendix B: Batch Plans Crude Oil Pipeline

Configurat ion Name:E28-7F5-SE1808-REVP LFTR Case Nalne:583_kbpd_design_w_BU_AT _AMEC

8lteh eR4NJ KM-DEl 10 O? Fluid Volum!; OP Fluid V olum,",

OXI ;O'J(I-) FL' OXI OXI HlJG-J FL' 'JXl OX I i OJOJ FL' OXI OXI

Tot~:-= FL' OXI

To::'IfD~v: 4IJClIJO

Condensate Pipeline

Configuration Name:E29-4A-AUG2108-DL Case Nome:214_kbpd

Batch KM-1NJ BR-DEL .0 OP Fluid Volume- OP Fluid Volum~

7:;:;: 1 0][]) FL' 7:! E

7::0:: ; (j]O] FL' nE 71E ; OJCD FL' 7::E 721: .~ FL' 71E

TcUI: 4 0000 Total.'Oav: 40000

PH 101: Batch Plan Data Page 2 of 67

PH 101: Batch Plan Data Page 2 of 50

Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,20 II) and has been issued for infonllation only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)


Page 52 of62 Issue Date: August 23 , 2011




Appendix C: Pump Curves

DGE

Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23 , 2011) and has been issued for infornlation only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)




. Hydraulic Design Proposal -Mainline


Note: This is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23 , 2011) and has been issued for information only. It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)







(A39833)





Appendix D: Graphical Hydraulic Profiles

Hilepos t:8.60 (m.iles)

1000 IiQQQQl

9.5K 9.5K

9 .0K 9.0K

8 .5K 8.5K

a.OK B.OK

7.SK 7.SK

7.0K 7.0K

6.5K 6.5K

6.0K 6.0K

S.SK 5 .5K

g ~

"'" § 5 ,oK 1l 5 .0K

" £ i .5K 4.5K

" .OK ".OK

3.5K 3.5K

3.0K 3.0K

2.SK 2.51(

2.OK 2.0K

1.5)( l.5K

1000.0 1000.0

500.0 500 .0

Ml

HAOH=8110 (tt)

36" Crude Oil Pipeline Hydraulic Profiles - Phase I Flow (583 kbpd)

HoIIIad"'7055 (ft.)

(onng: E28~N00310-REVT-vlA-PH1-Ann Case: 525_TA_EAJD

Hydraulic Gradient Profile

Profile of max head + elevation, head + elevation, elevation vs Milepost

Iilev&t1on-Z110 ( tt)

Milepost (mSes)


(A39833)


9.0K 9,OK

:3,5K 8,5K

a,OK a,OK

7, 5K 7,5K

7.0K 7.0K

6,5K 6,5K

6,OK 6,OK

5,5K 5,5K

5.0K 5.0K

~ 4,5K 4~r I 4,OK g

4,OK I 0 ~ <[ 3,5K " 3,5K [; ::: I

iii 3,OK 3,OK

2, 5K 2,5K

2,OK 2,OK

L5K 1.5K

1000,0 1000,0

500,0 500,0 P.Ol P.O




36" Crude Oil Pipeline Hydraulic Profiles - Phase IV Flow (944 kbpd)

Config: E28-SE2109-REVRHFAfvIEC Case: 944kbpd_Design Hydraulic GradientProfile

Profile of max head + elevation, head + elevation, elevation vs Mi lepost

f~ilepost (miles)


(A39833)


llilepost=606.6Z (lAiles) lIAOH=7617 (ftl

10000

~ [jQQQ

9.SK 9.51( 9.5K

9,()K 9.0K

B.5K 8.51(

8.0t( 8,OK

7.SK 7.SK

7.01: 7.Q!(

6,s*( 6.51(

6.01: 6.0K

S.5K 5 '5K~ ~ So g So

~ 5.0K 1 S.CK ~ '" t

; .51( 4.51( tiJ

4 ,ot~ 4.0K

3.SK 3.SI(

3 .0K 3.01(

2.51( 2.5K

2.OK 2.0I(

1.5K 1.51:

1000.0 1000.0

500.0 500 ,0

IJ:Ol IJ:Ol




20" Condensate Pipeline Hydraulic Profiles - Phase I Flow (214 kbpd)

Ha.d-6264 (ft)

[onflg: E29-N003tO-REVT-YIA-PHl-Ann Case: 193_TA_EA]D


Profile of max head + elevation) head + elevation) elevation vs Milepo51:

Blevat:ion-Z343 (ft)

Milepo5t(miles)


(A39833)


IUlepo5t:z460 . 47 (triles ) HAOH=7618 (ft)

,I

~ ~

9.51( 9.51(

9.01( 9.0K

6.51:: 8.5K

B.OK B.OK

7.5K 7, 5K

7.0K 7,OK

6.5K 6.51(

6.01( 6,OK

Z" 5.5K

5'5] ~ '=- g J: 0 5.0K 1 5.01: 'Ii «

~ " ' .5K 4.5K iii

"1.0K 4.0K

3.5K 3.5K

3.0K 3.0K

2.5K 2.5K

2,OK 2.0K

1.51( J.5K

1000.0 1000.0

501),0 500,0

Il.(j Il.O




20" Condensate Pipeline Hydraulic Profiles - Phase III Flow (306 kbpd)

He ad"'4675 I te)

(oong: E29-N00310-REVT-v2A-UlT-Ann Case: 275_TA_EA_FD


Prone of max head + elevation, head + ele .... ation, elevation 'IS Milepost

Elevation" Z370 C tt)

Milepost (miles)

Note: Tllis is a preliminary DRAFT (v3.6 dated August 23,2011) and has been issued for information only, It has not undergone a rigorous review by internal stakeholder groups.

(A39833)





Appendix E: Sensitivity Analysis


(A39833)






(A39833)





ENBRIDGE


(A39833)






(A39833)

Documents

Pipeline Hydraulic Design Proposal - · PDF filePipeline Hydraulic Design Proposal ... Project Code: Charge Code: 4032800002 ... Hydraulic Design Proposal which identifies the