PifT ’D dTdPreparing for Tomorrow’s Demands Today Authority Website.pdf · Total Georgia Import Value Southwest Georgia $6,463,449,627 $162,784,348 Southern Georgia $69,918,198

GEORGIA PORTS AUTHORITY: Preparing for Tomorrow’s Demands TodayGEORGIA PORTS AUTHORITY: Preparing for Tomorrow’s Demands Today

P i f T ’ D d T dP i f T ’ D d T dPreparing for Tomorrow’s Demands TodayCalendar Year 2010 Year in Review

The Port of Savannah

Preparing for Tomorrow’s Demands TodayCalendar Year 2010 Year in Review

The Port of Savannah

Lee BeckmannManager, Legislative Affairs

Georgia Ports Authority

Lee BeckmannManager, Legislative Affairs

Georgia Ports Authorityg yJuly 13, 2011

g yJuly 13, 2011

The Economic Impact of The Economic Impact of


Statewide295,443 full- and part-time jobs* Statewide295,443 full- and part-time jobs*

Georgia’s Deepwater PortsGeorgia’s Deepwater Ports

, p j(7% of Georgia’s total employment) $61.7 billion in sales

$26.8 billion in gross state product

, p j(7% of Georgia’s total employment) $61.7 billion in sales

$26.8 billion in gross state product

$15.5 billion in income

$ 3.5 billion in federal taxes

$ 1.5 billion in state taxes

$15.5 billion in income

$ 3.5 billion in federal taxes

$ 1.5 billion in state taxes

$ 1.1 billion in local taxes

Nationwide** In CY2010 the Port of Savannah moved

$ 1.1 billion in local taxes

Nationwide** In CY2010 the Port of Savannah moved

8.6% of total U.S. containerized trade.

The GPA handled 12.4% of total U.S. containerized exports in CY2010.

8.6% of total U.S. containerized trade.

The GPA handled 12.4% of total U.S. containerized exports in CY2010.

* Source: Terry College of Business, University of Georgia, FY2009** Source: U.S. Department of Commerce – based on tonnage


Northwest GeorgiaEstimated Cargo Values via

Northwest Georgia$1,069,687,578

Georgia Mountains$168,214,885

Northeast Georgia$517,613,552

Georgia’s Deepwater Ports in CY2010 by Regional Commissions

CY2010 Estimated Cargo Value

Atlanta$7,280,797,884

Three Rivers

Central SavannahRiver Area

$1 711 726 154Georgia Total Trade

$15,243,429,700

$751,522,375

River Valley

$1,711,726,154

Middle Georgia$280,176,970

Heart of Georgia CoastalTotal Georgia Export Value

$8,779,980,073

T t l G i I t V l

River Valley$228,423,089

Heart of GeorgiaAltamaha

$447,794,196Georgia

$2,048,337,923

Total Georgia Import Value$6,463,449,627Southwest Georgia

$162,784,348 Southern Georgia$69,918,198


$526.8 K$526.8 K$943.4 K$943.4 K

$170 M$170 M $43.1 M$43.1 M $48 7M$48 7M

More than $8.1 billion worth of cargo moves between the Metro

More than $8.1 billion worth of cargo moves between the Metro$170 M$170 M $43.1 M$43.1 M $48.7M$48.7M

$1 1 B$1 1 B $1 3 B$1 3 B$6.5M$6.5M

between the Metro-Atlanta area and the Port of Savannah and P t f B i k

between the Metro-Atlanta area and the Port of Savannah and P t f B i k

$2.4 M$2.4 M

$1.7 M$1.7 M$1.1 B$1.1 B

$57.9 M$57.9 M

$1.3 B$1.3 B

$708.4 M$708.4 M $205 M$205 M

Port of BrunswickPort of Brunswick

Top Five Counties: Fulton $3 5 Billion

Top Five Counties: Fulton $3 5 Billion

$27.8 M$27.8 M

$57.9 M$57.9 M

$3.5 B$3.5 B $19.9 M$19.9 M

$72.8 M$72.8 M $217.5M$217.5M

$54.7 M$54.7 M

Fulton $3.5 Billion

Gwinnett $1.3 Billion

Cobb $1.1 Billion

Fulton $3.5 Billion

Gwinnett $1.3 Billion

Cobb $1.1 Billion$274.6 M$274.6 M

$4.2 M$4.2 M$150.7 M$150.7 M

$160.3 K$160.3 K

$56.1 M$56.1 M$6.4 M$6.4 M

Dekalb $708 Million

Clayton $275 Million

R i i M t Atl t

Dekalb $708 Million

Clayton $275 Million

R i i M t Atl t$66.2 M$66.2 M

$0 K$0 K$17.7 M$17.7 M

Remaining Metro Atlanta Counties $1.22 Billion

Remaining Metro Atlanta Counties $1.22 Billion

Port of Savannah Container Throughput 12 year History by Calendar YearPort of Savannah Container Throughput 12 year History by Calendar Year


3,000Emergenceof SuezServices

Emergenceof SuezServices

12-year History by Calendar Year12-year History by Calendar YearRecessionRecession

19.919.9

2,500

f TEU

s USWC PortCongestion

USWC PortCongestion 13.6%13.6%

0.5%0.5%20.6%20.6%

9.9%9.9%

1 500

2,000

Thou

sand

s of

CongestionCongestion14.3%14.3%

9.3%9.3%14.6%14.6%

USWC PortClosure

USWC PortClosure

1,000

1,500In

22.6%22.6%

500'99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '1099 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10

Source: GPA Marketing / EIS (loads & empties)Source: GPA Marketing / EIS (loads & empties)

U.S. Economic RecessionU.S. Economic Recession

Top 10 U.S. Container Port Volume 2000 to 2010(in 000 TEUs loads & empties)

Top 10 U.S. Container Port Volume 2000 to 2010(in 000 TEUs loads & empties)


1 Los Angeles 4 879 7 831 4 8% -14% 16%1 Los Angeles 4 879 7 831 4 8% -14% 16%

(in 000 TEUs, loads & empties)(in 000 TEUs, loads & empties)2000 2010 10-Year % Chg % Chg

CAGR ’09 vs ’08 ’10 vs ’092000 2010 10-Year % Chg % Chg

CAGR ’09 vs ’08 ’10 vs ’09

1. Los Angeles 4,879 7,831 4.8% -14% 16%2. Long Beach 4,600 6,263 3.1% -22% 24%3. NY / NJ* 3,050 5,200 5.4% -13% 14%4 Savannah 948 2 825 11 5% -10% 20%

1. Los Angeles 4,879 7,831 4.8% -14% 16%2. Long Beach 4,600 6,263 3.1% -22% 24%3. NY / NJ* 3,050 5,200 5.4% -13% 14%4 Savannah 948 2 825 11 5% -10% 20%4. Savannah 948 2,825 11.5% -10% 20%5. Oakland 1,777 2,330 2.8% -8% 14%6. Seattle 1,488 2,133 3.7% -7% 35%7 Hampton Roads 1 347 1 895 3 4% -16% 9%

4. Savannah 948 2,825 11.5% -10% 20%5. Oakland 1,777 2,330 2.8% -8% 14%6. Seattle 1,488 2,133 3.7% -7% 35%7 Hampton Roads 1 347 1 895 3 4% -16% 9%7. Hampton Roads 1,347 1,895 3.4% -16% 9%8. Houston 1,061 1,812 5.5% flat 1%9. Tacoma 1,376 1,455 0.6% -17% -6%10 Charleston 1 632 1 364 -1 8% -28% 16%

7. Hampton Roads 1,347 1,895 3.4% -16% 9%8. Houston 1,061 1,812 5.5% flat 1%9. Tacoma 1,376 1,455 0.6% -17% -6%10 Charleston 1 632 1 364 -1 8% -28% 16%10. Charleston 1,632 1,364 -1.8% -28% 16% 10. Charleston 1,632 1,364 -1.8% -28% 16%

In 2000, Savannah ranked as the 10th largest U.S. container port in volume Savannah’s share of the total East Coast trade with Asia is 48%, up from 22% in 2000 In 2000, Savannah ranked as the 10th largest U.S. container port in volume Savannah’s share of the total East Coast trade with Asia is 48%, up from 22% in 2000

*Projection - 2010Source: AAPA*Projection - 2010Source: AAPA

Consistent Balanced TradeConsistent Balanced Trade


Calendar Year 2010: A Record Year for ExportsCalendar Year 2010: A Record Year for Exports

Ten Year HistoryTen Year HistoryCY20102009

CY20102009

Exports1,149,2151,026,802

Exports1,149,2151,026,802

Ten Year HistoryTen Year HistoryImports

1,051,256883,554

Imports1,051,256

883,554 CY10 Exports (52.2%)CY10 Exports (52.2%) 1,149,2151,149,215

\

B fitB fit

2008200720062005

2008200720062005

1,082,9481,005,373

782,445706,544

1,082,9481,005,373

782,445706,544

1,073,2591,074,025

866,220808,265

1,073,2591,074,025

866,220808,265

CY10 Imports (47.8%)CY10 Imports (47.8%) 1,051,2561,051,256

Benefits Lower ocean carrier costs Better equipment utilization

Benefits Lower ocean carrier costs Better equipment utilization

20052004200320022001

20052004200320022001

706,544649,506570,208498,885424 741

706,544649,506570,208498,885424 741

808,265679,212615,448565,256438 785

808,265679,212615,448565,256438 785

Source: EIS / Loads onlySource: EIS / Loads only

No ‘empty miles’ No ‘empty miles’20012001 424,741424,741 438,785438,785

70% of U.S. consumers, or 215 million people, are east of a line drawn from Chicago to Dallas

70% of U.S. consumers, or 215 million people, are east of a line drawn from Chicago to Dallas


Chicago to Dallas. 70% of job-creating companies are also east of the same line. The Port of Savannah is most strategically located to reach 44% of the U.S.

l i d 42% f ll j b i i

Chicago to Dallas. 70% of job-creating companies are also east of the same line. The Port of Savannah is most strategically located to reach 44% of the U.S.

l i d 42% f ll j b i ipopulation and 42% of all job-creating companiespopulation and 42% of all job-creating companies

44%44%44%44%

Source: 2009 U.S. Census EstimatesSource: 2009 U.S. Census Estimates

43 Weekly Vessel Calls Covering All Major Trade Lanes43 Weekly Vessel Calls Covering All Major Trade LanesSavannah’s Global Reach supports trade in 300-plus international ports (150-plus countries)Savannah’s Global Reach supports trade in 300-plus international ports (150-plus countries)

Asia via Panama 15 16Asia/India/Mid East via Suez 7 9North Europe 5 12

Asia via Panama 15 16Asia/India/Mid East via Suez 7 9North Europe 5 12

Oceania 2 2Mediterranean 5 6Latin America 9 18

Oceania 2 2Mediterranean 5 6Latin America 9 18

Sav - USECSav - USEC Sav - USECSav - USEC

pp

Source: GPA Mktg. Last updated: Feb. 2011 Source: GPA Mktg. Last updated: Feb. 2011

GPA, as ‘owner & operator’, provides flexibility & 24/7 cargo visibility.GPA, as ‘owner & operator’, provides flexibility & 24/7 cargo visibility.

PORT OF SAVANNAH: “Today”PORT OF SAVANNAH: “Today”

Source: GPA Engineering, April 2010Source: GPA Engineering, April 2010

PORT OF SAVANNAH: “Tomorrow”PORT OF SAVANNAH: “Tomorrow”

Mason ICTF served byNorfolk Southern RailroadMason ICTF served byNorfolk Southern Railroad Chatham ICTF served byChatham ICTF served byy

CSX Transportationy

CSX Transportation


Green EquipmentGreen EquipmentRefrigerated Container Racks 44 electrified racks online

GPA id i h 2 3 6

Refrigerated Container Racks 44 electrified racks online

GPA id i h 2 3 6

Green EquipmentGreen Equipment

GPA avoids using more than 2.376 million gallons of diesel annually

Rubber-Tired Gantry Cranes

GPA avoids using more than 2.376 million gallons of diesel annually

Rubber-Tired Gantry Cranes Newest RTGs use about four

gallons of diesel per hour 33% cost fuel-consumption savings

Newest RTGs use about four gallons of diesel per hour

33% cost fuel-consumption savings

PORT OF SAVANNAH: Gaining the Edge in a Competitive MarketPORT OF SAVANNAH: Gaining the Edge in a Competitive Market

Chatham ICTF (CSX) Chatham ICTF (CSX)

Mason ICTF (Norfolk Southern Railroad) Mason ICTF (Norfolk Southern Railroad) Mason ICTF (Norfolk Southern Railroad) Mason ICTF (Norfolk Southern Railroad) Chatham ICTF (CSX) Chatham ICTF (CSX)

One-of-a-kind Intermodal Infrastructure Two on-terminal Intermodal Container Transfer Facilities, or ICTF’s,

One-of-a-kind Intermodal Infrastructure Two on-terminal Intermodal Container Transfer Facilities, or ICTF’s,

are operated by GPA and are served by Norfolk Southern Railroad & CSXare operated by GPA and are served by Norfolk Southern Railroad & CSX


Mason ICTF /Mason ICTF /Mason ICTF /HWY 307 OverpassMason ICTF /HWY 307 Overpass

NS WyeNS Wye

CSXNorfolk SouthernNS and CSX

Garden City Garden City Ji D l hJi D l h

Brampton RoadConnectorBrampton RoadConnector


TerminalTerminalJimmy DeloachParkway ConnectorJimmy DeloachParkway Connector

Mason ICTF /HWY 307 OverpassMason ICTF /HWY 307 Overpass

Grange Road UpgradeGrange Road Upgrade


The Savannah Harbor Expansion Project (SHEP) Major Port DepthsThe Savannah Harbor Expansion Project (SHEP) Major Port Depths

545658Major Port DepthsMajor Port Depths

48505254

42444648

4042

SavN

Y/N

orfC

haM

iaPa nFreeLA

/LO

akA

ntwFeliH

a mB

remLe HC

oluB

usShaQ

uiH

o nYanTanTo kYokSydvannah

NJ folk

arlestonm

in. C

analeportLB

klandw

erpxstow

em

burgm

erhavH

arveum

bosananghaindao

ng Kong

ntiang. Pel.

kyokaham

adney

ven

g

Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Dec. 2010Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Dec. 2010

Existing LocksThe Panama Canal Expansion Project The Panama Canal Expansion Project


Existing LocksMax. Vessel: 4,400 TEUsMax. Vessel: 4,400 TEUswill be completed in 2014 and with that

will come bigger vessels, creating greater export market opportunities for

will be completed in 2014 and with that will come bigger vessels, creating greater export market opportunities for

42 ft.

U.S. manufacturers and U.S. jobs.U.S. manufacturers and U.S. jobs.

New LocksMax. Vessel: 12,600 TEUsMax. Vessel: 12,600 TEUs

depth

Panama Canal ‘Tomorrow’Panama Canal ‘Tomorrow’Source: Panama Canal Authority 2.2010Source: Panama Canal Authority 2.2010

60ft. depth


Savannah Harbor Expansion Project ScopeSavannah Harbor Expansion Project ScopeExpansion Project ScopeExpansion Project Scope

► Reconnaissance Study in 1996► Reconnaissance Study in 1996

► Congressional Authorization in 1999► Congressional Authorization in 1999

► Required approvals from:► Required approvals from:

► Required additional studies and the completion of a GRR

► Required additional studies and the completion of a GRR

► Required approvals from: ► Secretary of Commerce,► Secretary of Army,► Secretary of Interior,► EPA Administrator

► Required approvals from: ► Secretary of Commerce,► Secretary of Army,► Secretary of Interior,► EPA Administrator► GA and SC Resource Agencies► GA and SC Resource Agencies

► Required establishment of a Stakeholders Evaluation Group

► Required establishment of a Stakeholders Evaluation Group

► $40 million in state and federal funds ► $40 million in state and federal funds

► 12 Years of open and collaborative work to produce Draft EIS & GRR

► 12 Years of open and collaborative work to produce Draft EIS & GRR

spent to date on project study phasespent to date on project study phase

The Savannah Harbor Expansion Project (SHEP) The Savannah Harbor Expansion Project (SHEP)


Reconnaissance Study 1996 Project authorized by U.S. Congress 1999 Reconnaissance Study 1996 Project authorized by U.S. Congress 1999

Project MilestonesProject Milestones

Environmental and Economic Studies 1999 to 2011 Final Public Review & Comment Period Fall 2011 Assistant Sec. of the Army for Civil Works

(ASA CW) R i Wi t 2012

Environmental and Economic Studies 1999 to 2011 Final Public Review & Comment Period Fall 2011 Assistant Sec. of the Army for Civil Works

(ASA CW) R i Wi t 2012(ASA CW) Review Winter 2012 Office of Management & Budget Review Winter 2012 Record of Decision 2012 Construction 2012 to 2016

(ASA CW) Review Winter 2012 Office of Management & Budget Review Winter 2012 Record of Decision 2012 Construction 2012 to 2016 Construction 2012 to 2016 Construction 2012 to 2016

Cost Estimate for SHEP $625 million Cost Estimate for SHEP $625 millionProject Construction FundingProject Construction Funding

Estimated Federal Share (48 ft plan) $372 million Estimated State Share (48 ft plan) $253 million State Funding to Date $134 million

Estimated Federal Share (48 ft plan) $372 million Estimated State Share (48 ft plan) $253 million State Funding to Date $134 million


Atlantic OceanAtlantic OceanJasper OceanTerminal Site Jasper OceanTerminal Site

OceanT i lOcean

T i l

Garden City TerminalGarden City Terminal

TerminalTerminalHistoric

SavannahHistoric

Savannah


Engineering/Navigation FeaturesEngineering/Navigation Features


Environmental FeaturesEnvironmental Features

Savannah Harbor Expansion: Savannah Harbor Expansion:


Total (with

Costs for Project AlternativesCosts for Project Alternatives

Depth Construction Mitigation Total Total (with Interest)

44 $197.3 $191.0 $388.3 $424.344 $197.3 $191.0 $388.3 $424.345 $232.9 $207.4 $440.3 $481.346 $274.9 $209.7 $484.6 $532.647* $302.4 $215.6 $518.0 $569.348** $330.1 $221.3 $551.4 $606.3NOTE: 40-49% of Total Project Costs is for mitigation, 41.6% for the 47’NED *Tentative National Economic Development plan** Locally Preferred plan

Savannah Harbor Expansion: Savannah Harbor Expansion:


Ann ali ed Ann ali ed Net

Benefit to Cost Ratio for Project AlternativesBenefit to Cost Ratio for Project Alternatives

Depth Annualized Benefits

Annualized Costs

Net Benefits

44 $97.3 $25.7 $71.644 $97.3 $25.7 $71.645 $128.3 $28.1 $100.346 $142.9 $30.8 $112.147* $148.7 $32.7 $116.048** $150.4 $34.7 $115.7

*Tentative National Economic Development plan** Locally Preferred plan

Documents

PifT ’D dTdPreparing for Tomorrow’s Demands Today Authority Website.pdf · Total Georgia Import Value Southwest Georgia $6,463,449,627 $162,784,348 Southern Georgia $69,918,198