Physics - Spring Oscillations Lab

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/9/2019 Physics - Spring Oscillations Lab

    1/9

  • 8/9/2019 Physics - Spring Oscillations Lab

    2/9

    Introduction:

    The purpose of this lab was to examine Hookes law and inestigate the proportionalit! of force"

    distance traelled" and the uni#ue properties of an oscillating spring with an attached mass$ Hookes law "

    gien b! the e#uation % & kx" states that the restoring force '%( of an extended or compressed spring is

    proportional to the distance of compression or elongation 'x(" and is affected b! the springs constant of

    proprtionalit! 'k($ The experiments were designed to inestigate whether real-world spring behaior

    would conform to Hookes law$ )t is h!pothesi*ed that obserations of the oscillations of a mass moing

    the spring 'harmonic motion( can be used to calculate the spring constant uni#ue to the spring$ Minimal

    error between experimental 'obsered( and theoretical 'actual" calculated( spring constants will support

    the h!pothesis$

    Procedure:

    The experiment consisted of

    two exercises inestigating

    oscillations of a mass on a spring$ +

    force sensor was mounted to a ring

    stand and base" with the force

    measuring hook pointed

    perpendicular to the table surface$ +

    spring was hung from the hook" with

    a mass suspended from the spring$

    ,ulling down on the mass initiated

    ertical oscillating motion" with data

    recorded b! ata Studio on the computer through an S./01 interface$

    Data:

    T : period of Oscillation 's(

    m: mass 'kg(

    x: distance 'm(

    t: time 's(

    2: initial drop angle 'degrees(

    g: 3$45 'm6s7(

    % & ma '8(

    % & kx

    k & mg6x '86m(

    = km and =2 Tkm=2T

    (2

    T)2

    =

    k

    mk=m

    (2

    T)2

    Sinusoidal function:

    Asin [ 2 (xC)B ]+D 9 & T

  • 8/9/2019 Physics - Spring Oscillations Lab

    3/9

    ,ercent rror: |ObservedExpectedExpected |x100

  • 8/9/2019 Physics - Spring Oscillations Lab

    4/9

    xercise 5:

    Table 5:

    Mass (kg) Force (N) Displacement (cm) Displacement (m)

    1$15 1$134 ;$; 1$1;;

    1$17 1$53<

  • 8/9/2019 Physics - Spring Oscillations Lab

    5/9

    xercise 7:

    Table 7:

    Mass (kg) Period (s) T2/42

    1$17 1$0;4 1$11/

    1$1; 1$raph 7: Linear

    0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.050

    0.02

    0.04

    0.06

    0.08

    0.1

    0.12

    0.14

    0.16

    f(x) = 3.29x - 0

    R = 1

    Exercise 2: Mass vs T2/42

    T2/42

    Mass (k)

  • 8/9/2019 Physics - Spring Oscillations Lab

    6/9

    >raph ; ? 0cm displacement 'Sinusoidal function: Sine of best fit(

    >raph = - 71cm displacement 'Sinusoidal function: Sine of best fit(

  • 8/9/2019 Physics - Spring Oscillations Lab

    7/9

    nal!sis

    xercise 5 recorded the force and displacement of the spring$ Hookes law" F=kx " can be

    rewritten as k=F

    x 'where % is e#ual to the mass times grait!( to sole for the unknown spring

    constant$ +nal!sis of the slope of >raph 5 reeals the expected spring constant 'k( to be ;$7raph 7 reeals the obsered spring constant 'k( to be ;$7435 86m$

    The percent difference between the experimental and theoretical k alues was calculated as

    1$41C" indicating that the spring behaed according to Hookes law and all measurements were recorded

    accuratel!$

    |ObservedExpectedExpected |x100|3.2891N/m3.263N/m3.263N/m |x 100=0.80 Error

    "onclusion:

    @omparison of the resistance to force 'k( of the spring and the springs behaior during harmonic

    oscillations reealed conformance to Hookes constant within expected error and standard deiation$

    Theoretical calculations assume the spring to be massless and hae no effect on the period$ The percent

    error between k alues" howeer slight" reeals that the spring mass is important in real-world conditions$

    Successful experimental identification of the spring constant within standard deiation of the theoretical

    alue supports the h!pothesis that obserations of the oscillations of a mass moing the spring 'harmonic

    motion( can be used to calculate the spring constant uni#ue to the spring$ )mproements to consistenc!

    when inducing oscillations and inclusion of the spring mass will further minimi*e the experimental error$

    Oerall the experiments successfull! demonstrated the conformit! of harmonic spring motion to Hookes

    law$

  • 8/9/2019 Physics - Spring Oscillations Lab

    8/9

    #ncertaint! $ummar!

    Predicted (a%k%a% &'pected) alue:

    ;$7

  • 8/9/2019 Physics - Spring Oscillations Lab

    9/9

    >raph 0 ? Max6Min for xercise 5

    0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5

    0.000

    0.200

    0.400

    0.600

    0.800

    1.000

    1.200

    1.400

    1.600

    f(x) = 3.25x - 0.01

    R = 1

    f(x) = 3.27x - 0.01

    R = 1

    f(x) = 3.26x - 0.01

    R = 1

    Exercise 1: Force vs. Displacement

    Displacement (m)

    Force (N)

    >raph < ? Max6Min for xercise 7

    0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06

    0

    0.02

    0.04

    0.06

    0.08

    0.1

    0.12

    0.14

    0.16

    0.18

    f(x) = 2.73x + 0.01

    R = 1

    f(x) = 4.12x - 0.02

    R = 1f(x) = 3.29x - 0

    R = 1

    Exercise 2: Mass vs T2/42

    T2/42

    Mass (k)