21
1 UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO) OFFICE OF THE PROVOST MARSHAL GENERAL UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO) Physical Security Functional Perspective Mr. Richard Miller Chief, Physical Security Branch Operations Division -------- OPMG-RM Workshop May 2007

Physical Security Functional Perspective

  • Upload
    kalb

  • View
    38

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Physical Security Functional Perspective. Mr. Richard Miller Chief, Physical Security Branch Operations Division -------- OPMG-RM Workshop May 2007. Agenda. Efficiencies through improved business processes & procedures. Integrating with major Army Initiatives. Efficiencies. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Physical Security Functional Perspective

1

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

OFFICE OF THE PROVOST MARSHAL GENERAL

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

Physical SecurityFunctional Perspective

Mr. Richard MillerChief, Physical Security Branch

Operations Division--------

OPMG-RM WorkshopMay 2007

Page 2: Physical Security Functional Perspective

2

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

OFFICE OF THE PROVOST MARSHAL GENERAL

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

Agenda

• Efficiencies through improved business processes & procedures.

• Integrating with major Army Initiatives

Page 3: Physical Security Functional Perspective

3

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

OFFICE OF THE PROVOST MARSHAL GENERAL

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

Efficiencies

• De-scope intrusion detection system projects– Can’t resource all that is desired.– Site surveys must consider what 190-

series policy requires (AA&E, nuke/chem/bio, narcotics…)

– Greater coverage might require reimbursable funds for AAFES, NAF, for-profit corporations, and discretionary areas

– Inclusion of AR 37-49 BASOPS reimbursable matters into PS policy is in development.

Page 4: Physical Security Functional Perspective

4

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

OFFICE OF THE PROVOST MARSHAL GENERAL

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

Efficiencies

• Enhance security, standardize operations & reduce costs:– Do our projects achieve these goals?– Can benefits be measured?– Business Case Analysis required– High interest in technology to achieve

these three requirements

Page 5: Physical Security Functional Perspective

5

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

OFFICE OF THE PROVOST MARSHAL GENERAL

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

Efficiencies

• Manpower requirements– Existing and new requirements must be

justified• Availability Factor – CME – 2087hrs

• “ “– Gov Civ – 1740hrs

– Expect critical reviews– Business Case Analysis required– High interest in technology to achieve

these three requirements– If not tied directly to a DoD/HQDA

requirement – will not validate– “Essential Needs” driving the Train!!!

Page 6: Physical Security Functional Perspective

6

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

OFFICE OF THE PROVOST MARSHAL GENERAL

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

Integrating w/Army Initiatives

• Physical Security Planning must consider:

– Grow the Army– Global repositioning– BRAC (*)– Modular Force

• Growth Factors are critical for ACP throughput capacity (Guards and Entry Lanes) and IDS Replacement (# of Zones)

*BRAC (closure). Does not automatically mean the site is off the IDS planning chart. Maybe PMCS $$ needed to strengthen existing system until doors close.

* BRAC (realignment). Need as much info as possible to properly program IDS increases

Page 7: Physical Security Functional Perspective

7

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

OFFICE OF THE PROVOST MARSHAL GENERAL

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

Questions

Page 8: Physical Security Functional Perspective

8

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

OFFICE OF THE PROVOST MARSHAL GENERAL

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

Back-Up Slides Follow…

Page 9: Physical Security Functional Perspective

9

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

OFFICE OF THE PROVOST MARSHAL GENERAL

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

MDEP SUMMARY OF CHANGES (FY08-13 POM)

Amounts in $K

POM 08-13 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13PBR 07-11 Validated Requirements 1,174,799 1,049,214 1,078,476 1,090,665 1,090,733 1,107,900 N/A N/AFunded (Current) 559,869 553,987 403,750 374,514 399,380 406,721 N/A N/A

INCREASESOPA 75,304 140,363 151,268 80,792 MCA 35,075 39,458 4,080 TOTAL Increase in Requirement 110,379 140,363 190,726 84,872

DECREASESOMA 113,458 156,176 175,313 270,237 OMAR 969 1,612 4,512 4,336 OMNG 36,981 43,197 34,859 41,445 MCA 3,136 TOTAL Decrease in Requirement 151,408 204,121 214,684 316,018

POM 08-13 REQUIREMENTS FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13Requested Requirement N/A N/A 1,037,447 1,026,907 1,066,775 876,754 895,373 930,253

Page 10: Physical Security Functional Perspective

10

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

OFFICE OF THE PROVOST MARSHAL GENERAL

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

Where are your FY08 MDEP requirements programmedWhat FY08 requirements are critical?

Program or Category DAPM Req's II PEG CriticalPhysical Security

Barriers (.B) 14,571 11,220 Blast Mitigation (.C) 7,309 4,895 Communications (.D) 3,022 2,553 Explosives Detection (.E) 10,038 8,389 Intrusion Detection (.F) 59,782 49,697 Personnel Protection (.G) 1,780 1,548 Sensors, Other (.H) 16,356 10,962 Site Improvements (.J) 53,420 23,538 Mngt & Planning (.K) 22,549 20,670 Security Forces (.L0) 4,559 4,012 Contract Security Guards (.L1) 514,318 385,766 DA Civilian Labor (.L2) 22,442 16,832 Other Procurement 186,544 93,489 Construction 66,780 - Mission 53,977 41,068

TOTAL 1,037,447 674,639

Page 11: Physical Security Functional Perspective

11

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

OFFICE OF THE PROVOST MARSHAL GENERAL

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

Rationale for requirements change:• Reflects a significant decrease in CSG costs• Includes increase in ACP Maint, Automation Maint., and ACP consumables• Difference in AIM-HI:

• Does not include CSG requirements – funded for MDEP-VONE/VIRQ• Does not include Mission req’s• Does not include non-land holding MACOMs

Rationale for critical requirement amount:• Limited to CIV Pay (TDA), IDS/ESS/ACP Maint./Monitoring, Recurring Contracts associated with critical ACP Functions, and CSG’s.

Requested Requirement Changes OMA ROLL UP for Base Operations

Source data file is PB07 LOCK: Amount in $K FILE APPN Cmd SAG FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13

PBR 0711 Validated Rqts OMA Various 131 N/A N/A 719,082 737,092 765,363 778,980 N/A N/AAIMHI 08-13 StPt OMA Various 131 N/A N/A 200,752 204,966 209,165 211,545 215,990 220,523AIMHI POM 08-13 Adjustment OMA Various 131 N/A N/A 352,146 326,959 331,488 246,346 255,437 271,616POM 08-13 Requested Rqts (New AIMHI POM + Adjustments)

OMA Various 131552,898 531,925 540,653 457,891 471,427 492,139

II PEG Critical Rqts OMA Various 131 N/A N/A 406,283 401,228 410,057 348,542 339,399 375,401Current Funding OMA Various 131 N/A N/A 240,578 217,310 240,753 244,821 N/A N/A

Page 12: Physical Security Functional Perspective

12

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

OFFICE OF THE PROVOST MARSHAL GENERAL

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

Rationale for requirements change:• This is first time we broke out Mission separately!

Rationale for critical requirement amount:• Limited to CIV Pay (TDA), IDS/ESS/ACP Maint./Monitoring, Recurring Contracts associated with critical ACP Functions, and CSG’s.

Requested Requirement Changes OMA ROLL UP (Mission)

Source data file is PB07 LOCK: Amount in $K FILE APPN Cmd SAG FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13

PBR 0711 Validated Rqts OMA Various 435,121,135 N/A N/A 1,251 1,303 1,340 1,391 N/A N/AChange OMA Various 435,121,135 52,726 48,991 49,397 50,853 N/A N/APOM 08-13 Requested Rqts OMA Various 435,121,135 53,977 50,294 50,737 52,244 57,529 56,957II PEG Critical Rqts OMA Various 435,121,135 N/A N/A 41,068 38,442 38,661 39,731 43,941 43,540Current Funding OMA Various 435,121,135 N/A N/A 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A

Page 13: Physical Security Functional Perspective

13

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

OFFICE OF THE PROVOST MARSHAL GENERAL

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

Requested Requirement Changes OMNG ROLL UP

Source data file is PB07 LOCK: Amount in $K FILE APPN Cmd SAG FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13

PBR 0711 Validated Rqts OMNG 180 131 N/A N/A 177,731 178,895 174,408 181,024 N/A N/AAIMHI 08-13 StPt OMNG 180 131 N/A N/A 47,640 48,480 49,444 50,485 51,544 52,625AIMHI POM 08-13 Adjustment OMNG 180 131 N/A N/A 93,110 87,218 90,105 89,094 89,833 93,380POM 08-13 Requested Rqts (New AIMHI POM + Adjustments) OMNG 180 131 140,750 135,698 139,549 139,579 141,377 146,005II PEG Critical Rqts OMNG 180 131 N/A N/A 109,891 101,860 97,855 99,272 99,997 103,250Current Funding OMNG 180 131 N/A N/A 67,473 69,423 70,013 71,920 N/A N/A

Rationale for requirements change:• See follow-on slides for Cmd & APE details

Rationale for critical requirement amount:• Limited to CIV Pay (TDA), IDS/ESS/ACP Maint./Monitoring, Recurring Contracts associated with critical ACP Functions, and CSG’s.

Page 14: Physical Security Functional Perspective

14

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

OFFICE OF THE PROVOST MARSHAL GENERAL

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

Requested Requirement ChangesOMAR ROLL UP

Source data file is PB07 LOCK: Amount in $K FILE APPN Cmd SAG FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13

PBR 0711 Validated Rqts OMAR 2A0/240 131 N/A N/A 37,467 37,184 37,740 38,506 N/A N/AAIMHI 08-13 StPt OMAR 2A0/240 131 N/A N/A 24,144 24,514 25,041 25,577 26,112 26,663AIMHI POM 08-13 Adjustment OMAR 2A0/240 131 N/A N/A 12,498 11,204 8,337 8,746 7,714 8,290POM 08-13 Requested Rqts (New AIMHI POM + Adjustments) OMAR 2A0/240 131 36,498 35,572 33,228 34,170 33,671 34,794II PEG Critical Rqts OMAR 2A0/240 131 N/A N/A 23,908 24,086 23,345 24,773 24,331 25,161Current Funding OMAR 2A0/240 131 N/A N/A 16,681 16,962 16,297 16,091 N/A N/A

Rationale for requirements change:• See follow-on slides for Cmd & APE details

Rationale for critical requirement amount:• See follow-on slides for Cmd & APE details

Page 15: Physical Security Functional Perspective

15

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

OFFICE OF THE PROVOST MARSHAL GENERAL

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

Rationale for requirements change: • PSE items have completed RDT&E cycle – now ready for production• ACP automation investment• New req’s due to BRAC, modularity & IGPBS (mainly alarm systems)• $150M ACP FY06 Supplemental did not survive OSD – added into FY08-10• OPA requirements and funding will roll to Command Code 210.• Increase in ESS to comply w/SecDef directive to secure Bio assets (AR 190-xx, Biological Select Agent & Toxin Security Program)

Rationale for critical requirement amount:• PSE items have completed RDT&E cycle – now ready for production•Complete VCSA-directed ACPEP initiative – installed portion • Initial fielding of MDARS, LKMD, TVSS & FIRRE• Initial ACP technology• Re-hab alarms at large ammo supply points in Germany (Miesau & Weilerbach)

Requested Requirement Changes OPA ROLL UP

FILE APPN Cmd APE FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13PBR 0711 Validated Rqts OPA Various MA0 N/A N/A 111,240 94,205 86,825 91,374 N/A N/AChange OPA Various MA0 N/A N/A -111,240 -94,205 -86,825 -91,374 N/A N/APOM 08-13 Requested Rqts OPA Various MA0 0 0 0 0 0 0Proposed Critical Rqts OPA Various MA0 N/A N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0Current Funding OPA Various MA0 N/A N/A 79,018 70,819 72,327 73,889 N/A N/A

Source data file is PB07 LOCK: Amount in $K

FILE APPN Cmd SAG FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13PBR 0711 Validated Rqts OPA 210 MA0 N/A N/A 0 0 0 0 N/A N/AChange OPA 210 MA0 N/A N/A 186,544 234,568 238,093 172,166 N/A N/APOM 08-13 Requested Rqts OPA 210 MA0 186,544 234,568 238,093 172,166 191,369 200,357 II PEG Critical Rqts OPA 210 MA0 N/A N/A 93,489 105,473 95,799 63,957 91,429 93,757 Current Funding OPA 210 MA0 N/A N/A 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A

Page 16: Physical Security Functional Perspective

16

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

OFFICE OF THE PROVOST MARSHAL GENERAL

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

FY08-13 UFRs

UFR DESCRIPTION: Physical Security Personnel (CSG’s)

• Security Forces & Technicians - All personnel and operating costs associated with security forces whose primary or supporting mission is to safeguard personnel, facilities, or critical assets.

UFR IMPACT:

• Cannot properly secure Army installations & facilities• May require Borrowed Military Manpower (BMM)• Degrades Army readiness• Increases vulnerability to Soldiers, their families and civilian employees

(Amount in $K)UFR Priority: 1

APPN CMD APE FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY08-11OMA Vari. ***075L10 287,657 310,918 306,183 209,644 1,114,402 OMNG 180 ***G75L10 85,605 88,667 92,938 96,533 363,743 Total UFR 373,262 399,585 399,121 306,177 1,478,145

Page 17: Physical Security Functional Perspective

17

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

OFFICE OF THE PROVOST MARSHAL GENERAL

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

FY08-13 UFRs

APPN CMD APE FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY08-11OPA 210 MA0 54,450 89,769 86,816 40,669 271,704 Total UFR 54,450 89,769 86,816 40,669 271,704

(Amount in $K)

UFR Priority: 2

UFR DESCRIPTION: Procurement of physical security systems for use in automated access control, access control point equipment program (ACPEP), intrusion detection systems (IDS), personnel identity management, and comprehensive force protection applications.

UFR IMPACT: • Cannot complete VCSA-directed ACPEP initiative (installed portion) , which will result in -

Delayed fielding of ACP automated identification technology; which will result in a – Continuation of the contract security guard requirement to check ID cards.

• Unable to secure arms, ammunition, explosives and sensitive items in a safe, secure manner (IDS)• Aging IDS means more guards• Some older IDS no longer have repair parts in inventory

Page 18: Physical Security Functional Perspective

18

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

OFFICE OF THE PROVOST MARSHAL GENERAL

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

Issues

• Approximately $150M OPA needed each year. Needs will increase as more tactical PS equipment items come out of their RDT&E phase, Technology for Access Control Points goes into place and until the VCSA-Directed Access Control Point Equipment Program is completed .

• Need better fidelity on USAREUR IGPBS schedule.

• Funding for ARCENT (Current guidance is that CONOPS funds Iraq & Afghanistan)

• Detailed Way Ahead for Army ACP Automation pending final results of Ft. Hood Demo – Aug/Sep 06.

• In discussion w/EE PEG reps regarding transferring dual-use PSE.

• Installed portion of ACPEP ($150M) remains incomplete – requested unsuccessfully in FY06 Supplemental. ACPEP must be completed before new automation can be integrated.

Page 19: Physical Security Functional Perspective

19

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

OFFICE OF THE PROVOST MARSHAL GENERAL

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

Program Does• Fund 100% authorized CivPay (not overhires)• Fund maintenance/monitoring of electronic security systems and Access Control

Equipment • Begin to standardize infrastructure to receive ACP automation• Provide for Production/Fielding of 4 new PSE systems (LKMD, TVSS• MDARS, FIRRE) which will provide additional FP capabilities to

deployed/BASOPS forces.

Program Does Not• Complete VCSA-directed ACPEP (21 of 133 CONUS installations)• Fund CONOPS, AWCF, TWCF, DHP, and NAF requirements.• Fund the total CSG requirement• Replace Alarm Systems in a timely manner• Fund New or replacement Explosives Detection Equipment.• Fund New or replacement Lightly Armored Vehicles.• Fund New CCTV or Access Control Systems at other than Installation ACPs.• Fund New Blast Mitigation projects (window protection, blast walls, etc)• Fund New Fencing, Lighting or other Site Improvements.• Fund Training for critical PSE.

Page 20: Physical Security Functional Perspective

20

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

OFFICE OF THE PROVOST MARSHAL GENERAL

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

POM Building “Do’s”

• Do …

– Put the bottom line up front by stating what you need. Then follow that fact with supporting details.

– Cite Army physical security policy requirements by regulation, chapter, para and sub-para.

– Include enough details to validate.

– Separate salary out from other personnel costs.

– Cite one requirement per Schedule 75 record.

– Cite project number for MILCON requirements.

Page 21: Physical Security Functional Perspective

21

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

OFFICE OF THE PROVOST MARSHAL GENERAL

UNCLASSIFIED (FOUO)

POM Building “Do Not’s”

Do Not / Avoid CommentsAT or FP requirements QPSM is only for PS.AT regulations QPSM is only for PS.

SIPRNet & STU-IIIsMCXL (Long Haul Communications); II PEG; DAMI-ZR (703.692.9261)

Build or re-hab police stations, fire stations and EOCs or re-locate parking areas ENGRsDo not POM for any Fire,EMT, or safety itemsCommo upgrades for LE/Fire/EMT Land Mobile Radio program; 703.602.6295Avoid using the same O&M $$ across the years Some inflation ea. yr. is expectedDo not split MCA costs across years MCA's are one-time/one-costDo not forget O&M “tail” Request as a separate requirementGO quarters Approved by Congress, funded by AFHOHotels & child care centers Funded by NAF or other fundsSalaries/support for overhires