Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Full Paper
ISSN (Print): 2220-2625
ISSN (Online): 2222-307X
*Corresponding Author Received 20th
August 2013, Accepted 23rd
January 2015
Synthesis and Characterization of Novel (E)-tert-butyl 7-(4-methoxyphenyl)-5-(4,4,5,5-
tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)hept-2-enoate and (E)-diethyl (6-(4-
methoxyphenyl)-4-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)hex-1-en-1-
yl)phosphonate; Application of Olefin Cross Metathesis
*H. Hussain, S. R. Gilani, Z. Ali and I. Hussain
Department of Chemistry, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan
Email: *[email protected]
ABSTRACT Two novel compounds (E)-tert-butyl 7-(4-methoxyphenyl)-5-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)hept-2-enoate and (E)-
diethyl (6-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)hex-1-en-1-yl)phosphonate were synthesized in
excellent yields by olefin cross metathesis (CM). 3-(4-methoxyphenyl)propyl diisopropylcarbamate and allylboronic acid pinacol
ester were reacted in the presence of s-BuLi/N,N,N,N-tetramethylethyllenediamine (TMEDA) to form sec. boronic ester which
was further reacted with tert-butyl acrylate and diethyl vinylphosphonate respectively to get the desired products. Both novel
compounds have applications as reactants for cyclopropanation and cyclopentataion for asymmetric synthesis.
Keywords: Allylic boronic ester, Lithiation Borylation, Olefin Cross Metathesis, Hoveyda-Grubbs Catalyst 2nd Generation,
Asymmetric synthesis.
1. INTRODUCTION The formation of carbon-carbon double bonds by olefin metathesis is the most powerful and broadly applicable
synthetic tool of modern organic chemistry1-3
. Olefin metathesis has become a mainstay in organic synthesis4,5
that is
becoming an increasingly important tool in the synthesis of small molecules, preparation of natural products, and
construction of polymers. It is a metal-catalyzed transformation, which acts on carbon carbon double bonds and
rearranges them via cleavage and reassembly6,7
. According to this mechanism, first introduced by Chauvin, the
coordination of an olefin to a metal carbene catalytic species leads to the reversible formation of a metallacyclobutane.
This intermediate then proceeds by cycloreversion via either of the two possible paths: 1) non-productive—resulting
in the re-formation of the starting materials or 2) product-forming—yielding an olefin that has exchanged a carbon
with the catalyst’s alkylidene. Since all of these processes are fully reversible only statistical mixtures of starting
materials as well as all of possible rearrangement products are produced in the absence of thermodynamic driving
forces8. This method is especially effective in the case of cross metathesis (CM) reactions involving terminal olefins
9.
In particular, cross metathesis (CM) reactions promoted by ruthenium-based catalysts have been widely utilized by
synthetic organic as well as polymer chemists in the construction of higher olefins from simple alkene precursors10
. N-
Heterocyclic carbene (NHC) ligand-containing catalysts, such as the second-generation Grubbs catalyst
11 are widely
used. Karl Voigtritter12
studied iodide effect on olefin cross metathesis reactions. Many attempts had been made for
cyclopropanation and cyclopentanation reactions using boron-ate complexes. A number of boronic esters were tried
for cyclopropanation and cyclopentanation. Abbasi13
synthesized different sulfonamides including heterocyclic
moieties for the evaluation of their various biological activities.
In this study, we synthesized such boronic esters which have electron withdrawing groups by carrying out CM
reactions used. These compounds might be used as starting materials for asymmetric synthesis if electron withdrawing
groups could promote cyclopropanation and cyclopentanation. It was expected that the presence of electron
withdrawing groups on boronic esters definitely promote 1, 3-migration to cyclopropanation and cyclopentanation.
Allylic boronic ester (3) was first synthesized by the reaction of 3-(4-methoxyphenyl)propyl diisopropylcarbamate (1)
with allylboronic acid pinacol ester (2). Allylic boronic ester (3) was the reacted with tert-butyl acrylate (4) and
diethyl vinylphosphonate (6) to synthesize novel compounds (E)-tert-butyl 7-(4-methoxyphenyl)-5-(4,4,5,5-
tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)hept-2-enoate (5) and (E)-diethyl (6-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-
1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)hex-1-en-1-yl)phosphonate (7).
2. EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
2.1 Materials Sec. butyllithium solution (sBuLi) (1.6M), allylboronic acid pinacol ester, N,N,N,N-tetramethylethyllenediamine
(TMEDA), diethyl vinylphosphonate and Hoveyda-Grubbs Catalyst 2nd Generation were purchased form Sigma
Aldrich and tert-butyl acrylate was taken from Acros. All chemicals were used as such as received. TMEDA was
distilled over CaH2. Anhydrous diethyl ether (Et2O) and dichloromethane (DCM) were obtained under nitrogen
andstored in Young’s flasks over 4Ao molecular sieves. Reaction was carried out in flame-dried glassware under
nitrogen atmosphere.
Pak. J. Chem. 5(3): 117-125, 2015
DOI:10.15228/2015.v05.i03.p04
Pakistan Journal of Chemistry 2015
2.2 Synthesis and Characterization of 2-(1-(4-methoxyphenyl)hex-5-en-3-yl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-
dioxaborolane (3) To a solution of 3-(4-methoxyphenyl)propyl diisopropylcarbamate (1.0g, 3.41mmol, 1.0eq) (1) and N,N,N,N-
tetramethylethyllenediamine (TMEDA) (0.61mL, 4.09mmol, 1.2eq) (2a) in Et2O (17mL) at -78oC was added Sec.
BuLi (1.6M in 92:8 cyclohexane/hexane, 2.9mL, 3.75mmol, 1.1eq) dropwise. After stirring the reaction mixture for 5h
at -78oC, allylboronic acid pinacol ester (0.77mL, 4.09mmol, 1.2eq) (2) was added dropwise. The reaction mixture
was further stirred at -78oC for 1h and then allowed to warm to room temperature. A solution of MgBr2.OEt2 in Et2O,
made as follows, was added to the reaction mixture at this point: [1,2-dibromoethane (0.60mL, 6.88mmol, 1.0eq) was
added to a suspension of magnesium (0.17g, 6.88mmol, 1.0eq) in Et2O (8.6mL) at room temperature. The reaction
flask was then placed into a water bath in order to control the moderate exotherm and was further stirred for 2h]. Both
layers of the biphasic mixture thus obtained were transferred to the former mixture via syringe. The mixture was
refluxed for 16h.
The reaction mixture was allowed to cool down to room temperature and was carefully quenched with water. Et2O
was added, the layers were separated and the aqueous phase was extracted with Et2O. The combined organic layers
were washed with 1N HCl, 1N NaOH, water and brine, dried (MgSO4), concentrated and purified by column
chromatography (SiO2) to obtain the pure 2-(1-(4-methoxyphenyl)hex-5-en-3-yl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-
dioxaborolane (3) (0.81g, 75.3%) as colorless oil. The reaction is given in Figure 1.
Complete characterization was done by taking 1H NMR,
13C NMR and IR. It was used as starting material for reaction
(Figure 2, 3).
IR (film): ν (cm–1
) 3026 (sp2C-H Stretch), 2977, 2924, 2852 (sp
3 C-H Stretch), 1511, 1456(sp
2 C=C Stretch), 1243,
1175, 1142 (sp3C-O Stretch), 846, 822, 670 (sp
2 C-H oop bending).
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 7.09 (2H, d, J=8.80 Hz, 2 ArH) 6.81 (2H, d, J=8.80 Hz, 2 ArH) 5.86 – 5.75
(1H, m, CH=CH2) 5.04 (1H, d, J=2.20 Hz, CH=CHH) 4.94 (1H, d, J=10.27 Hz, CH=CHH) 3.78 (3H, s, OCH3) 2.63 -
2.48 (2H, m, ArCH2CH2CHBCH2) 2.27 - 2.11 (2H, m, ArCH2CH2CHBCH2) 1.78 - 1.58 (2H, m, ArCH2CH2CHBCH2)
1.25 (12H, s, 4 CH3) 1.08 - 1.18 (1H, m, ArCH2CH2CHBCH2) 13
C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 157.6 (1C, -OCH3), 138.4 (2C, 2 ArCH), 135.0 (2C, 2 ArCH), 129.2 (1C,
ArC-O), 114.9 (1C, -CH2CH=CH2), 113.6 (1C, -CH=CH2), 83.0 (2C, 2 C(CH3)2), 55.2 (1C, ArCCH2), 35.3 (1C, -
CH2CH2CHB), 34.5 (1C, -CH2CHB), 33.1 (1C, -CHBCH2CH), 24.9 (1C, -CH2CH2CHB), 24.8 (4C, 2 (CH3)2C). 11
B NMR (96.23 MHz, None) δ ppm 33.24
16
15
14
13
18
17
12
11
10
19
20
21
B5
O1
23
O4
6
78
9
O22
23 H21a
H21b
H14.Proton.esp
7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
Norm
alized Inte
nsity
1.0711.982.092.342.113.131.001.010.992.052.01
M05(s,23)
M02(m,17,15)
M01(m,18,14)
M11(d,21b)
M09(s,9,8,6,7)
M04(d,21a)
M10(m,10)
M03(m,20) M06(m,12)
M07(m,19)
M08(m,11)
1.1
21.1
21.1
41.1
51.1
61.2
51.6
41.6
51.6
61.6
81.6
91.7
11.7
31.7
42.1
62.1
82.2
12.5
42.5
52.5
62.5
72.5
92.6
0
3.7
8
4.9
34.9
34.9
54.9
65.0
05.0
05.0
45.0
4
5.0
5
5.7
55.7
75.8
05.8
1
5.8
45.8
6
6.7
96.8
06.8
26.8
3
7.0
87.0
87.1
17.1
1
1H-NMR
Frequency (MHz): 399.77
Solvent: Chloroform-d
2-(1-(4-methoxyphenyl)hex-5-en-3-yl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolane (3)
118
Hussain et al, 2015
16
15
14
13
18
17
O22
23
12
11
10
19
20
21
B5
O1
23
O4
6
78
9
h14.Carbon.esp
152 144 136 128 120 112 104 96 88 80 72 64 56 48 40 32 24 16 8 0
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
Norm
alized Inte
nsity
157.6
0(2
3)
138.4
4(1
5,1
7)
135.0
2(1
4,1
8)
129.2
4(1
6)
114.9
1(2
0)
113.6
5(2
1)
83.0
3(3
,2)
77.3
377.0
276.7
0 55.2
3(1
3)
35.3
8(1
2)
34.5
0(1
0)
33.1
7(1
9)
24.8
8(1
1)
2-(1-(4-methoxyphenyl)hex-5-en-3-yl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolane (3)
13C-NMR
Frequency (MHz): 100.53
Solvent: Chloroform-d
16
15
14
13
18
17
O22
23
12
11
10
19
20
21
B5
O1
23
O4
6
78
9
h14.Boron-NMR.esp
95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
Norm
alized Inte
nsity
33.2
4
11B NMR
Frequency (MHz): 96.23
Solvent: None
2-(1-(4-methoxyphenyl)hex-5-en-3-yl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolane (3)
2.3. Synthesis and Characterization of (E)-tert-butyl 7-(4-methoxyphenyl)-5-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-
dioxaborolan-2-yl)hept-2-enoate (5) To a solution of allyl boronic ester (0.75g, 2.37mmol, 1.0eq) (3) and tert. butyl acrylate (0.75mL, 4.74mmol, 2.0eq)
(4) in CH2Cl2 (30mL) was added Grubbs-Hoveyda II (0.027g, 0.043mmol, 0.02eq) (4a). The flask was fitted with a
condenser and refluxed under nitrogen for 15h. Reaction was monitored by TLC. The reaction mixture was then
reduced in volume to 0.5mL and purified directly on a silica gel column eluting with 9:1 Pet. Ether/ EtOAc to get the
desired product (E)-tert-butyl 7-(4-methoxyphenyl)-5-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)hept-2-enoate
(0.78g, 78.82%) (5)14
.
The product (5) was completely characterized by
1H NMR,
13C NMR and IR.
119
Pakistan Journal of Chemistry 2015
IR (film): ν (cm–1
) 2977, 2930 (sp3 C-H Stretch), 1711 (sp
2C=O Stretch), 1651, 1612 (C-C=C Stretch), 1512,
1456(sp2 C=C Stretch), 1244, 1214, 1139 (sp
3C-O Stretch), 849, 822, 682 (sp
2 C-H oop bending).
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 7.08 (2H, d, J=8.56 Hz, 2 ArH) 6.85 (1H, t, J=7.21 Hz, CH=CHCOO ) 6.81
(2H, d, J=8.56 Hz, 2 ArH) 5.73 (1H, dt, J=15.41, 1.47 Hz, , CH=CHCOO) 3.77 (3H, s, OCH3) 2.62-2.47 (2H, m,
ArCH2CH2CHBCH2), 2.36-2.21 (2H, m, ArCH2CH2CHBCH2) 1.78-1.57 (2H, m, ArCH2CH2CHBCH) 1.46 (9H, s, 3
CCH3) 1.24 (12H, s, 4 CCH3) 1.21-1.16 (1H, m, ArCH2CH2CHBCH2) 13
C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 165.9 (1C, COO) 157.6 (1C, ArC) 147.5 (1C, CH=CHCOO) 134.6 (1C, ArC)
129.2 (2C, 2 ArCH) 123.5 (1C, CH=CHCOO) 113.6 (2C, 2 ArCH) 83.2 (2C, 2 C(CH3)2) 79.8 (1C, C(CH3)3)
55.2 (1C, OCH3) 34.3 (1C, ArCH2CH2CHBCH2) 33.5 (1C, ArCH2CH2CHBCH2) 33.1 (3C, C(CH3)3) 28.1 (4C, 2
C(CH3)2) 24.82 (1C, ArCH2CH2CHBCH2) 24.81 (1C, ArCH2CH2CHBCH2). 11
B NMR (96.23 MHz, None) δ ppm 29.54
HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C24H37BO5 [M+H]+ 417.2811, found 417.2811.
16
15
14
13
18
17
12
11
10
19
20
21
B5
O1
23
O4
6
78
9
O26
27
22
O23
O28
24
25
29
30
H15.Proton.esp
7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
Norm
alized Inte
nsity
1.0911.418.342.622.252.262.881.052.400.672.00
M09(s)M05(s)
M10(s)
M01(d)
M02(t)
M03(d)
M04(dt)
M11(m)
M06(m)
M07(m)
M08(m)
1.1
71.1
91.2
11.2
4
1.4
6
1.6
31.6
51.7
21.7
32.2
52.2
72.2
92.5
12.5
32.5
42.5
62.5
72.5
82.6
0
3.7
7
5.7
15.7
15.7
55.7
5
6.8
06.8
26.8
56.8
7
7.0
77.0
9
(E)-tert-butyl 7-(4-methoxyphenyl)-5-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)hept-2-enoate (5)
1H-NMR
Frequency (MHz): 399.77
Solvent: Chloroform-d
16
15
14
13
18
17
12
11
10
19
20
21
B5
O1
23
O4
6
78
9
O26
27
22
O23
O28
24
25
29
30
H15.Carbon.esp
168 160 152 144 136 128 120 112 104 96 88 80 72 64 56 48 40 32 24 16 8 0
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
Norm
alized Inte
nsity
24.8
124.8
2
28.1
4
33.1
733.5
634.3
4
55.2
3
76.6
877.0
077.3
279.8
083.2
6
113.6
9
123.5
7
129.2
4
134.6
3
147.5
7
157.6
6
165.9
7
(E)-tert-butyl 7-(4-methoxyphenyl)-5-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)hept-2-enoate (5)
13C-NMR
Frequency (MHz): 100.53
Solvent: Chloroform-d
120
Hussain et al, 2015
16
15
14
13
18
17
12
11
10
19
20
21
B5
O1
23
O4
6
78
9
O26
27
22
O23
O28
24
25
29
30
H15.Boron-NMR.esp
95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0
Chemical Shift (ppm)
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
Norm
alized Inte
nsity
29.5
4
(E)-tert-butyl 7-(4-methoxyphenyl)-5-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)hept-2-enoate (5)
11B-NMR
Frequency (MHz): 96.23
Solvent: None
(E)-tert-butyl 7-(4-methoxyphenyl)-5-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)hept-2-enoate (5)
2.4 Synthesis and Characterization of (E)-diethyl (6-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-
dioxaborolan-2-yl)hex-1-en-1-yl)phosphonate (7) To a solution of allyl boronic ester (0.10g, 0.316mmol, 1.0eq) (3) and diethyl vinylphosphonate (0.12mL, 0.632mmol,
2.0eq) (6) in CH2Cl2 (20mL) was added Grubbs-Hoveyda II (0.0039g, 0.0063mmol, 0.02eq) (4a). After fitting a
condenser to the flask, reaction mixture was refluxed under nitrogen for 15h. Reaction completion was monitored by
TLC. The reaction mixture was then reduced in volume to 0.5mL and purified directly on a silica gel column eluting
with 9:1 Pet. Ether/ EtOAc to get pure (E)-diethyl (6-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-
yl)hex-1-en-1-yl)phosphonate (0.11g, 79%) (7)13
.
121
Pakistan Journal of Chemistry 2015
1H NMR,
13C NMR and IR were taken to characterize (E)-diethyl (6-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-
dioxaborolan-2-yl)hex-1-en-1-yl)phosphonate (7).
IR (film): ν (cm–1
) 2978, 2930 (sp3 C-H Stretch), 1630, 1612 (C-C=C Stretch), 1512, 1443 (sp
2 C=C Stretch), 1242,
1166, 1142 (sp3C-O Stretch), 960, 821, 731 (sp
2 C-H oop bending).
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 7.10 (2H, d, J=8.61 Hz, 2 ArH) 6.83 (2H, d, J=8.61 Hz, 2 ArH) 6.80-6.70
(1H, m, CH=CHPO) 5.73-5.61 (1H, m, CH=CHPO) 4.12-4.02 (4H, m, 2 CH2CH3) 3.80 (3H, s, OCH3) 2.66-2.50
(2H, m, ArCH2CH2CHBCH2) 2.46-2.27 (2H, m, ArCH2CH2CHBCH2) 1.80-1.59 (2H, m, ArCH2CH2CHBCH) 1.32
(6H, td, J=7.15, 1.65 Hz, 2 CH2CH3) 1.27 (12H, s, 4 CCH3) 1.25-1.20 (1H, m, ArCH2CH2CHBCH2). 13
C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ ppm 157.6 (1C, ArC-O), 153.3 (CH=CHPO), 134.5 (1C, ArC), 129.2 (2C, 2
ArCH), 118.1 (1C, CH=CHPO), 116.2 (2C, 2 ArCH), 113.7 (2C, 2 C(CH3)2), 83.3 (2C, 2 CH2CH3), 61.5, 61.4
(1P, d, CHPO), 55.2 (1C, OCH3), 35.6 (1C, ArCH2CH2CHBCH2), 34.2 (1C, ArCH2CH2CHBCH2), 33.0 (1C,
ArCH2CH2CHBCH2), 24.8 (4C, 2 C(CH3)2), 16.38 (1C, ArCH2CH2CHBCH2), 16.31 (2C, 2 CH2CH3). 11
B NMR (96.23 MHz, None) δ ppm 29.73
HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C23H38BO6P [M+H]+ 453.2574, found 453.2574.
16
15
14
13
18
17
O26
27
12
11
10
19
20
21
B5
O1
23
O4
8
9 6
7
P22
O31
O23
O28
29
30
24
25
H26.Proton.esp
7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
Norm
alized Inte
nsity
1.2911.406.162.412.122.082.804.021.030.872.001.81
M06(s) M11(s)
M02(d)
M01(d)
M10(td)
M12(m)
M05(m)
M03(m)
M04(m) M07(m)
M08(m)
M09(m)
1.2
11.2
31.2
41.2
71.3
21.3
31.3
41.6
51.6
81.7
41.7
51.7
62.3
32.3
92.4
12.5
42.5
52.5
62.5
72.5
82.5
92.6
12.6
5
3.8
04.0
24.0
34.0
54.0
74.0
94.1
04.1
1
5.6
25.6
25.6
75.6
8
5.7
25.7
2
6.8
26.8
4
7.0
97.1
1
(E)-diethyl (6-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)hex-1-en-1-yl)phosphonate (7)
1H-NMR
Frequency (MHz): 400.18
Solvent: Chloroform-d
2.5 Equipments To take
1H NMR and
13C NMR measurements Varian NMR (400 MHz) spectrometer was used. Chemical shifts for
protons were measured .Relative to tetramethylsilane (TMS) at δ= 0 ppm all chemical shift for protons were
measured.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION First allylic boronic ester (3) was synthesized by Lithiation-borylation methodology mentioned in section 4.2 by
reacting Carbamate (1) with allylboronic ester (2) as colorless oil in excellent yields (75.3%) (table 1, entry 1).
Conditions for this reaction are given in figure 1.
Table-1: Data of Starting Materials
Entry Starting Material Color Yield (%)
1 2-(1-(4-methoxyphenyl)hex-5-en-3-yl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-
dioxaborolane Colorless oil 75.3
122
Hussain et al, 2015
16
15
14
13
18
17
12
11
10
19
20
21
B5
O1
23
O4
6
78
9
O26
27
P22
O31
O23
O2829
30
2425
H26.Carbon.esp
168 160 152 144 136 128 120 112 104 96 88 80 72 64 56 48 40 32 24 16 8 0
Chemical Shift (ppm)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
Norm
alized Inte
nsity
16.3
216.3
8
24.8
6
33.0
734.2
635.6
6
55.2
4
61.4
461.5
0
76.6
877.0
077.3
2
83.3
1
113.7
0116.2
9118.1
5
129.2
2
134.5
6
153.3
1
157.6
8
(E)-diethyl (6-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)hex-1-en-1-yl)phosphonate (7)
13C-NMR
Frequency (MHz): 100.53
Solvent: Chloroform-d
16
15
14
13
18
17
12
11
10
19
20
21
B5
O1
23
O4
6
78
9
O26
27
P22
O31
OEt23
OEt24
H26.Boron-NMR.esp
95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0Chemical Shift (ppm)
-0.2
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
Norm
alized Inte
nsity
29.7
3
(E)-diethyl (6-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)hex-1-en-1-yl)phosphonate (7)
11B-NMR
Frequency (MHz): 96.23
Solvent: None
Allylic boronic ester (3) was used as starting material for the synthesis of novel compounds. (E)-tert-butyl 7-
(4-methoxyphenyl)-5-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)hept-2-enoate (5) and (E)-diethyl (6-(4-
methoxyphenyl)-4-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)hex-1-en-1-yl)phosphonate (7) were
synthesized by reacting boronic ester (3) with tert-butyl acrylate (4) and diethyl vinylphosphonate (6).
Chemical reactions with detailed conditions are mentioned in figure 2 and 3 respectively.
Table-2: Yields of Products
Entry Boronic Ester Reagents Products Yield (%)
1
78.82
2
79
123
Pakistan Journal of Chemistry 2015
16
15
14
13
18
17
12
11
10
19
20
21
B5
O1
23
O4
6
78
9
O26
27
P22
O31
O23
O2829
30
2425
(E)-diethyl (6-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)hex-1-en-1-yl)phosphonate (7)
For the product (E)-diethyl (6-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)hex-1-en-1-
yl)phosphonate (7), yield was quite high (table 2, entry 2) while for (E)-tert-butyl 7-(4-methoxyphenyl)-5-(4,4,5,5-
tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-2-yl)hept-2-enoate (5) yield was comparable (table 2, entry 1) and reasonably high.
Both novel compounds (5, 7) were characterized by 1H NMR,
13C NMR,
11B NMR and IR; detailed study of which is
given in section 4.3 and 4.4.
4. CONCLUSIONS In the recent study, two novel compounds (E)-tert-butyl 7-(4-methoxyphenyl)-5-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-
dioxaborolan-2-yl)hept-2-enoate (5) and (E)-diethyl (6-(4-methoxyphenyl)-4-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-
2-yl)hex-1-en-1-yl)phosphonate (7) were synthesized in excellent yields by olefin cross metathesis. These compounds
could have applications as starting materials for asymmetric synthesis. Presence of electron withdrawing groups in
these compounds could promote cyclopropanation and cyclopentanation. For the product (5) yield was 78.82% (table
2, entry 1) while for the other product (7) yield was slightly great 79% (table 2, entry 2).
5. ACKNOWLEDGMENT Financial support provided by the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan is warmly acknowledged. Authors
moreover acknowledge the Department of Chemistry, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore-Pakistan;
Superior University Raiwand Road Lahore-Pakistan and University of Bristol, Bristol, U.K for guidance, research and
laboratory facilities.
6. REFERENCES 1. Chauvin, Y., Angew Chem, Int Ed. (2006), 45, 3740-3747, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.200601234.
2. Schrock, R. R., Angew Chem, Int Ed. (2006), 45, 3748-3759, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.200600085.
3. Grubbs, R. H., Angew Chem, Int Ed. (2006), 45, 3760-3765, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.200600680.
4. Hoveyda, A. H., Zhugralin, A. R. Nature (2007), 450, 243-251, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06351.
5. Furstner, A., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. (2000), 39, 3012-3043, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1521-
3773(20000901)39:17<3012::AID-ANIE3012>3.0.CO;2-G.
6. Grubbs, R. H., Tetrahedron (2004), 60, 7117-7140, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2004.05.124.
7. Trnka, T. M., Grubbs, R. H. Acc. Chem. Res. (2001), 34, 18-29, http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ar000114f.
8. Herrison, J. L., Chauvin, Y. Makromol. Chem. (1971), 141, 161-167,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/macp.1971.021410112.
9. Connon, S. J., Blechert, S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. (2003), 42, 1900-1923,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.200200556.
10. Schrodi, Y., Pederson RL Aldrichimica Acta. (2007), 40, 45-52.
124
Hussain et al, 2015
11. Scholl, M., Ding, S., Lee, C. W., Grubbs, R. H., Org Lett. (1999), 6, 953,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ol990909q. 12. Voigtritter, K., Ghorai, S., Lipshutz, B. H., J Org Chem. (2011), 76(11), 4697-4702,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo200360s.
13. Abbasi, M. A., Aziz-ur-Rehman, Muhmood, T., Khan, K. M., Ashraf, M., Ejaz, S. A., Arshad, S., J. Chem.
Soc. Pak. (2013), 35(2), 404.
14. Lipshutz, B. H., Ghorai, S., Boskovic, Z. V., Tetrahedron (2008), 64, 6949-6954,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2008.04.027.
125