Phoenicia - Canaan

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/27/2019 Phoenicia - Canaan

    1/3

  • 7/27/2019 Phoenicia - Canaan

    2/3

    According to Britannica, the origin of the term Canaan ca-na-na-um is disputed, but it may derive

    from an old Semitic word denoting reddish purple, referring to the rich purple or crimson dye

    produced in the area or to the wool coloured with the dye. Biblically, Canaanites erroneously are

    identified in Genesis as descendants of Canaan, a son of Ham and grandson of Noah.

    The Hebrew cana'anithe word meant merchant, an occupation for which the Canaanites were well

    known.

    According to Niels Peter Lemche book The Canaanites and Their Land, it meant the Lowlands. The

    Greeks and after them the Romans called it Phoenicia, which means, the Land of Palms.

    As my understanding, Canaan syndicates a reference to a Geographical, Cultural and Religious and

    not Canaan the son of Ham and the father of Sidon as the Old Testament indicate.

    The territory of Canaan has been described as the Levants southern part, comprising Palestine,

    Lebanon, and southern Syria (A. Mazar 1990). More specifically, Canaans boundaries began in the

    south at Wadi al-'Arish and reached north to the Lebanon and the Anti-Lebanon Mountain ranges.

    The western border was, of course, the Mediterranean, and the eastern was Transjordan and the

    Jordan River and Dead Sea farther south (Hackett 1997).

    The first written reference to Canaan or Canaanite was found in a contemporary text from Mari. The

    term did not appear again until the late fifteenth century booty list of the Egyptian pharaoh

    Amenophis II.

    In later centuries, it appeared several times in the Amarna letters and in a text from Alalakh. It was

    also found in two texts from ca. the year 1200 B.C.E., a list of merchants discovered at Ugarit and the

    Egyptian Merneptah Stele.

    Several issues thus require resolution for the term. One is geographic, another is ethnic and last

    cultural.

    The main authentic source should be Ugarit Ras Shamra and not the Old Testament, the Old

    Testament is a mimic of the discovered tablets of Ugarit as history is revealing.

    These discovered tablets describes authentic stories, like the attack of the Sea People, another one

    describing the birth of the saviour, a third telling the story of the flood etc

    Ugaritic texts almost always provide the essential datum for describing Canaanite religion because,

    while the Ugaritians distinguished themselves from Canaanites, Ugaritic religious literature has

    enough links with later biblical literature to place Ugarit on a cultural continuum with Canaan.

    Sources:

    Gibson, Canaanite Myths and Legends .

    J. A. Montgomery, Notes on the mythological epic texts from Ras Shamra .

    T. H. Caster, A Canaanite ritual drama: The Spring festival at Ugarit.

    L. A. Waddell , The Phoenician Origin Of Britons Scots & Anglo-Saxons.

  • 7/27/2019 Phoenicia - Canaan

    3/3

    http://www.theology.edu/ugarbib.htm

    http://www.theology.edu/ugarbib.htmhttp://www.theology.edu/ugarbib.htmhttp://www.theology.edu/ugarbib.htm