Upload
hope-mcdonald
View
226
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Jones (1985) Waxing & Waning of Research Topics in Social Psychology Waxing: Social & political Zeitgeist Personal interest and characteristics of the researcher Power of a good theory—heuristic quality Convenient research paradigms Prestige of researcher/laboratory Availability of funding/editorial policies of journals/student interest Freedom offered by a new research area
Citation preview
Philosophy of Science Issues
• What is a theory?• Are theories capable of proof?• What is a law• What is meant by scientific determinism?• What is the difference between fatalism
and determinism?
Jones (1985) Waxing & Waning of Research Topics in Social Psychology
Waxing:• Social & political Zeitgeist• Personal interest and characteristics of the
researcher• Power of a good theory—heuristic quality• Convenient research paradigms• Prestige of researcher/laboratory• Availability of funding/editorial policies of
journals/student interest• Freedom offered by a new research area
Jones (1985) Waxing & Waning of Research Topics in Social Psychology
Waning:• Problem is solved• Dead end appears• Discovery of methodological flaws• Research paradigms may be vulnerable to
changes in ethical standards and practices
Kuhn (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions.
• Normal science: research based upon previous scientific achievements
• Paradigms: laws, theories, application, instrumentation providing models for research traditions
• Revolutions: the rapid discarding of an older paradigm and its rapid replacement by a new paradigm
Kuhn’s (1962) Model of Scientific Revolution
Revolution
Emergence of a new paradigm
Normal science
Data doesn’t fit ???
New cases appear
New technology
New measurement
New world view
Standardization
Textbook popularization
Ring (1972): “Let’s Get Started: An Appeal to What’s Left in Psychology”
• Psychology should side with the powerless in society and do research to advance their interests
• Whose interests does psychology serve? Who funds psychology? Who hires psychologists?
Ring (1972): “Let’s Get Started: An Appeal to What’s Left in Psychology”
Roles for psychology:1. Investigation2. Advocacy
Relevant institutions: police, courts, prisons, schools, welfare bureaucracy, gov’t. agencies, mental hospitals, universities, etc.
Ring (1972): “Let’s Get Started: An Appeal to What’s Left in Psychology
Research should have three components:
1. Description2. Analysis3. Criticism
Ring (1972): “Let’s Get Started: An Appeal to What’s Left in Psychology
Research requirements for psychologists:1. Journalistic ability to penetrate institutional
screen2. Broad sociological framework3. An ability to describe and document the
psychological effects of the institution upon its clients
4. A concern for systematic data collection5. Development of alternative institutional
arrangements (counter-institutions)
Is it psychology? Ring states that activism is OK when:
• Activism is undertaken for responsible, wealthy clients.
• It is to the individual’s (or profession’s) financial interest.
• Activism does not threaten the political order by suggesting an external causation for social problems
Kurt Lewin
• No theory without application, no application without theory
• Action research• Founder of group
dynamics• Active in experimental
psychology, personality theory, developmental psychology, group therapy, and applied social psychology.
Kurt Lewin
• No theory without application, no application without theory
• Action research• Founder of group dynamics• Active in experimental psychology, personality theory,
developmental psychology, group therapy, and applied social psychology.
Qualitative Action Research (1992)Fine & Vanderslice
• Kurt Lewin is their model: the interconnection between theory and practice
• Research as change
• Researchers are passionate, political individuals which suffuse our choice of research questions, methods, interpretations and our writing
• Do we still believe in a value-free science?
• How does activist research transform the role of researcher?
• Is there really a distinction between the objective researcher and one with a position?
Qualitative Action Research (1992)Fine & Vanderslice (continued)
• Activist researcher assumes all research is biased or at least slanted in some political direction.
• Activist researcher is involved in the change effort.
• Data collection itself is empowering and a strategy for change—it is an intervention.
Activist researchers have these characteristics:
• Activist researchers assume all research is biased, or at least, skewed in some political direction.
• Activist researchers are involved in the change effort.• Data collection itself is a strategy for change.• Data collection itself is an intervention.• Activist researchers involve all participants in discussing
their inter-relationships and power differences.• Researchers do not know more than those participating
in the social system under study.
Some concepts from Fine & Vanderslice
• Q-sort methodology: a card sorting task where individuals sort cards (which are printed with personality descriptions) into predetermined piles which have a specific number of cards to be added. A distribution is therefore forced.
• Grounded theory: a research method in which the theory is developed from the data rather than the other way around
• Praxis: the act of engaging, applying, exercising, realizing, or practicing ideas. The practical application of a theory