Philosophy and Literature Essays

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 Philosophy and Literature Essays

    1/10

    Both Conrads The Heart of Darknessand Kafkas Metamorphosis, in different ways, are about looking

    beneath the surface. Explain, as thoroughly as possible, how each of these literary works is about

    looking beneath the surface and in each case what is found by looking beneath the surface.

    The Heart of Darkness

    The story begins on a ship docked at the river Thames when the narrator of the story, Marlow,

    begins telling a story of a journey to Africa. Marlow begins his tale by commenting on the past history of

    England and relating that history to a trip he made to Africa. Thus, Marlows first quip regarding how

    the history of England is a dark history makes us think that there are underlying themes in Marlows

    story about Africa which reflect back to themes relevant to England. That is, Marlow is going to Africa, a

    colony where much violence exists but, looking beneath the surface, we find that England also has a

    history of being colonized by Rome. Therefore, the underlying message is that those who are colonizing

    and those being colonized may be the same and may not be permanently fixed. Also, the suggestion

    with Marlows first comments is that the state England found itself in under colonization was not

    civilizedand maybe this history is not far beneath the surface. The entire text ofHeart of Darkness

    reflects this idea of looking beneath the surfacenot just at society but at individuals too.

    So, we begin our trip with Marlow but we first see that Marlow must make two stops. First,

    Marlow visits with a doctor. This doctor has examined skulls and brains of people who go into the

    Congo and suggests that changes take place with the people who enter the Congo. This version of the

    Congo, when one looks beneath the surface, may represent madness. That is, once one goes further

    into the Congo (and thus looks further beneath the surface) they see things so horrific that they come

    back with some sort of mental problems or madness. The second stop Marlow makes is to visit his aunt.

    Marlows aunt sees his impending trip as something favorable; she thinks that he is going to bring

    civilization to distant and uncivilized lands. When we look beneath the surface we may wonder how

    likely such a scenario truly is.

    Marlow sets off for Africa from a port in Belgium. Marlows sales down the coast of Europe and

    eventually reaches the coast of Africa. As the boat approaches the mouth of the Congo there is an

    incident involving another ship; the ship is shooting cannonballs into the jungle but there does not

    appear to be anyone on the receiving end of the cannonball fire. Again we get the indication that things

    are not quite right and that, beneath the surface, there is madness. When Marlow arrives to his first

    destination he gets an assignment; this first destination is at the outer stationsuggesting that, as

    Marlow goes closer to the inner station, Marlow will be looking more and more beneath the surface. At

    the outer station Marlow sees people being treated in a barbarous way by people from so-called

    civilized areasthe heart of the modern world. Marlow then has a conversation with the station

    manager and this is where he first learns of Kurtzthe man running the inner station. The impression

    that Marlow seems to get when hearing about Kurtz (a character beneath the surface) is that others

    look up to him; other people from the company view Kurtz as a company star because he brings in more

    ivory than everyone else. Also, it seems, that people are somewhat fearful of Kurtz. This being said,

    while Kurtz is a star, he is also insane.

  • 8/13/2019 Philosophy and Literature Essays

    2/10

    So, the Heart of Darkness keeps referring to this looking beneath the surface. But, as Marlow

    gets beneath the surface plans seem to run aground. In the outer station we get the impression that

    civilized people are becoming uncivilized. In the middle station, Marlow is supposed to catch a boat but

    they are waiting for parts for the boat (rivets, which hold things together)that is, as you look more and

    more beneath the surface, things start falling apart. Also, we see in the central station that the manager

    is a brick maker; this seems strange because there are no bricksand bricks, like rivets, hold things

    together. Building materials are needed in general because things are breaking downthis might mean

    that things are not going as smoothly beneath the surface as one might think; society is breaking down.

    We see that the Belgian people in Africa are there on a quest to get rich. In so doing, the so-called

    civilized people resort to barbaric actions as they plunder Africa.

    As Marlow moves to the inner station, we get the impression that nature is not very friendly.

    That is, as we look further beneath the surface, we see that we might not be made for each other. This

    issue is quite large in a philosophical sense when looking at the world we find ourselves in and our place

    in that world. As you get beneath the surface, plans run aground. There may not, in fact, be a special

    place for humans. There is no God looking after us in this context. Beneath the surface things are not sotame; there is violence and life is out of control. This, however, is something we have in common with

    the world; and as Marlow moves beneath the surface something inside of him responds to the

    wilderness because this same wilderness is found within the human being.

    Moving closer to the inner station Marlow comes across a hut and a book; the book is about

    seamanship and there are notes in the book that Marlow takes to be some kind of cipher. Language

    usually holds society together, but as we get beneath the surface, language falls apart. Then again, this

    cipher was really Russian. So, we might just take this part of the story to mean that, if one culture

    cannot understand another culture, society breaks down. The movement into the inner station is very

    foggy; this may suggest that looking beneath the surface is difficult. Eventually Marlow is attacked bylocals and begins to suspect that Kurtz is dead. But, the locals did not attack Kurtz, they will not attack

    Kurtz, they are only attacking the boat so that it will not take Kurtz away. That is, Kurtz has become

    something of a hero or god figure for the locals. Maybe there is a point that one goes too far when

    looking beneath the surface.

    When the boat reaches the inner station the first person they meet is Russian. This Russian is a

    friend of Kurtz and was the individual who wrote in the book that Marlow found. Before long, Marlow

    leaves the boat with the Russian and goes to meet Kurtz. When Marlow enters the house he sees

    shrunken heads on sticks; these would usually be odd lawn decorations; however, Kurtz uses them to

    scare people. Upon meeting Kurtz, one realizes that something within him as indeed responded to the

    wild nature of the jungle. Underneath the surface his soul has gone mad. During the time Marlow

    spends with Kurtz, Marlow finds out about human sacrifice. Marlow finds that the native people regard

    Kurtz as some sort of divinity and this suggests why they attacked the boat; they do not want Kurtz to

    go. Eventually Marlow gets Kurtz on the boat to head back to Belgium. Kurtz becomes very ill and he

    does not make the trip; he dies on the boat. Marlow tells people that Kurtzs last words were the

    horror.

  • 8/13/2019 Philosophy and Literature Essays

    3/10

    Next Marlow and others decide to bring some of Kurtzs belongings to Kurtzs fiance. Upon

    arriving the fiance has one very pressing question, What were Kurtzs last words? Marlow lies to her

    and says that, instead of saying the horror, Kurtzs last words were her name. This suggests that

    Marlow respects Kurtz to a certain degree. Marlow admires the fact that Kurtz faced up to the

    realization that the world we find ourselves in does not live up to intentions and may even be hostile.

    Indeed nature may not even be our permanent home.

    Metamorphosis

    In this book we are faced with a Cartesian (as in Descartes) sense that we have to look beyond

    the appearance of things if we want to understand truth. What we find inMetamorphosisis that Gregor

    Samsa wakes up one morning as a dung beetle. As Gregor goes to move he cannot. The problem here

    has to do with the fact that his lived body is not there for him. Gregors first concern is that he is going

    to be late for work. We learn that the type of work Gregor does as a traveling salesman is quite similar

    to that of a drone in a beehive or a worker ant. This may be Kafkas attempt to show that, as we look

    beneath the surface of modern society, the workers life is much like that of a drone. Eventually

    Gregors manager from work shows up (quite indicative of the type of working environment Gregor

    deals with) and when the manager sees that Gregor has turned into a dung beetle, the manager runs off

    down the street.

    After a while Gregors sister begins to care for him. Gregor knows, however, that he is ugly

    looking and so wants to spare his sister any site of him; he hides under a couch whenever he hears that

    she is coming. So, we see here that Gregor and his sister still have a special relationship but that Gregor

    is caught between two contexts. On the one hand he is human; but, on the other hand, he is an insect.

    We know that Gregor enjoys certain aspects of his new insect lifehe plays on the walls and swings

    upside down from the ceilingbut we also know that he is upset. We know that Gregor had plans to

    send his sister to music school; but now that he is an insect, he probably feels as though that chance is

    gone. Also, when Gregors sister and mother decide to move furniture for him so that he has more

    space to play, they move a picture of a woman in a fur hat and Gregor becomes very upset. It is as if

    Gregor is still attracted to the human world but this part of the human world, the instinct of mating, is

    shared with the insect world. What is not shared, however, is the ability to read pictures. Also, we

    know that there is a definite human element to Gregor because he enjoys listening to his sister play

    music. Insects, as far as we know, do not obtain the same kind of enjoyment from music.

    Unfortunately for Gregor, it eventually seems as though the family would be better off if he

    were gone. When his own mother catches site of him he ends up running after her to console her and

    scares her so bad that she faints. It takes Gregors father having to come home to force Gregor back to

    his room by throwing an apple at him, which lodges in Gregors back. This apple stays in his back, goes

    bad, and becomes a problem for Gregorit will ultimately end up killing him.

    When new characters come into the story (borders who live with the Samsa family) we see that,

    as time goes by, the care for Gregor declines. It is as if he is being pushed further and further out of the

    human world. In fact, the family goes on to hire a cleaning woman and, because she has never met

  • 8/13/2019 Philosophy and Literature Essays

    4/10

    Gregor the human, we suspect that her presence (calling him names and treating him in a subhuman

    manner) are indeed indicative of the fact that he is being pushed further out of the human world. Soon

    the borders find out about Gregor when Gregor makes an appearance while his sister is playing the

    violin (again, Gregor seems to be caught between the human and insect world). It seems that the

    borders are very intrigued by Gregor but when they are told by the Samsa family that they cannot see

    him, they become very upset. So, with this latest incident of Gregor causing more problems, the family

    decides the borders should go. Next, the cleaning woman finds Gregor dead.

    When Gregor dies we get the definite sense that there was a point where Gregor went from

    being a him to an it in the story; his sister even stops calling Gregor by his name. So, with Gregor

    now dead, the family moves on; they even decide to physically move to a new location. Now that his

    father has a job (which he did not when Gregor was working and providing for the family) they are able

    to move to a better place.

    When looking beneath the surface of this story, what we seem to find is that the insect is the

    most human of all the characters. Gregor wants to send his sister to school, he wants to provide for his

    family (even if it means going back to work as a drone), he enjoys playing, and he enjoys music more

    than other people (such as the borders). It seems that the more and more Gregor is pushed from the

    human world to the insect world we find that he is still human. Everyone else just seems to take the

    fact that Gregor has turned into an insect for granted; they take it in stride. No one ever says, How

    could he turn into an insect? As we look beneath the surface of Gregor and we get past his grotesque

    looks, despite having been pushed out of the human world and despite that nobody seems shocked that

    Gregor is an insect, we find that Gregor still manages to express human qualities. It seems as though

    this story is about where we find ourselves and where our place in the world is. Even though Gregor is

    not communicating, he expresses human qualities especially with people; and so there seems to be a

    place for humans in the world after all.

    In Manns Tonio Kroegerand in Camuss The Stranger, the main characters, Tonio Kroeger and

    Meursault, can be described as outsiders. Explain, as thoroughly as possible how each of them is an

    outsider. Then explain, as thoroughly as possible, what each of them eventually learns, from his

    status as an outsider,about who he is and his place in the world.

    Tonio Kroeger

    First, when we meet Tonio Kroeger, he is a young boy living in northern Germany. He likes to

    write poetry and he comes from a prominent family; his mother is an Italian-born woman with an

    artistic side and his father is a German man with an esteemed position in the government. So, it is at

    this point where we begin to get a sense that Tonio has two sidesand these sides may reflect the

    differences between his parents. Unfortunately for Tonio, his two sides cause him great struggle in

    finding who he is and what his place in the world is.

  • 8/13/2019 Philosophy and Literature Essays

    5/10

    We begin to get a sense that Tonio is an outsider because, though he lives in northern Germany,

    Tonio does not seem to have a home. That is, though he lives in the north (his fathers home) the part

    of him affected by his mother being Italian seems to be at odds with the people with whom he

    surrounds himself; Tonio has conflict with his friends. For example, his friend Hans Hansen appears at

    the beginning of the story to be a major source of inspiration for Tonio; however, Tonio also realizes that

    Hans does not have the same interests as Tonio does. Hans is the German equivalent of what people in

    America might call an All American Boy: he is good at sports, he is popular, and he stands out among

    the other kids; Hans is a natural. On one hand, it isthis natural ability that so attracts Tonio (this

    may represent his Fathers side); however, on the other hand, Tonio wants Hans to be interested in

    what Tonio is interested inreading, poetry, and other artistic pursuits. Unfortunately for Tonio, Hans

    is not interested in artistic pursuits (things that may represent Tonios mothers side). In fact, not only

    does Hans not share Tonios artistic side, Hans appears to treat Tonio as if Tonio is somehow different or

    foreign(we see this particularly when Hans is around his other friends). Hans sees Tonio as an outsider.

    So, when it comes to Tonios relationship with Hans, we see an especially profound instance of

    Tonio being a so-called outsidereven in his own home town. The conflict building up in Tonio causeshim to view Hans, and many of the other northern German people whom Tonio surrounds himself, with

    a sense that norther German people are somehow shallow. For example, Tonio is quite attracted to a

    school girl named Ingeborgbut this attraction ultimately ends with Tonio feeling embarrassed and

    feeling that Ingeborg, like Hans, is shallow. Though Ingeborg, a veritablefemaleHans, provides Tonio an

    opportunity to show how envious he is of north German people, when Tonio realizes that Ingeborg does

    not have the same romantic feelings for him that he has for her (such as when she does not run after

    him when he is laughed at after a mistake during dance lessons), Tonio decides that maybe he does not

    belong in northern Germany after all. That is, Tonio finds that he feels like an outsider in his own home

    town, so he decides to leave northern Germany for Munich (southern Germany). In so doing, Tonio

    moves closer to his mothershome and closer to a more artistic atmospherewith a culture more

    accepting of Tonios artistic and dreamy tendencies. Tonio is seeking to find a place where he belongs.

    In Munich Tonio becomes a full time artist and writer and lives an artistic bohemian lifestyle.

    While in Munich, Tonio meets a girl named Lisaveta who is also an artist. After living with Lisaveta,

    however, Tonio realizes that he still feels like an outsider. Tonio probably realizes this soon after he and

    Lisaveta have an argument over what it means to be an artist. In this scene, we see that Tonio has

    reservations about being an artist. In his argument with Lisaveta about the role of the artist, Tonio finds

    that the north German part of his personality is add odds with some of his southern artistic

    tendencies; where many people in the south view the north with a certain kind of disdain, Tonio feels a

    closer kinship with much of the north German culture. Tonio does not like how Lisaveta says that artistshave to be ruthless and that they have to grind up peoples lives to surviveespecially people with

    simple lives. In Tonios opinion, people with such simple lives (such as those in the north) are eliminated

    by artiststhis is unsettling to Tonio because he has admiration for people who live simple lives

    (perhaps as a result of Tonio being his fathers child). Eventually the argument causes Tonio to take

    some time off from Munich. Tonio decides to head for a resort town on the Danish coast.

  • 8/13/2019 Philosophy and Literature Essays

    6/10

    At this point we see that Tonios conflict has been internalized. Tonio is both an outsider at

    home and away from home. Eventually Tonios trip up north becomes an eye opening experience;

    home has changed. We see here a repeated literary device wherein, when something goes wrong,

    characters learn about themselves. By going up north Tonio is able to reflect on his childhood. He

    realizes that he was an outsider as a child; but now, instead of feeling that he needs to run away, he has

    matured. Tonio has now grown into himself as an artist. In a letter to Lisaveta he realizes that his

    conflict (his being an outsider) has been the source of his art; and his art has been a way to deal with

    this conflict. So what Tonio is saying is that the human imagination is an ability or a capacity that we

    have that lets us deal with conflicts that take shape when we ask about our place in the world. Art, that

    is, is one of the strongest forms of imagination. And so, Tonio, being an artist, symbolizes how we, as

    humans, use art to address questions about who we are and what our place in the world is. Ultimately,

    for Tonio, the growing as a person and as an artist leads to the realization that art is a way of dealing

    with conflicts that take shape in life when asking about ones place in the world. The source of his art

    and his art are both ways of dealing with these conflicts; imagination helps one deal with conflicts and

    art is a very refined method of imagination.

    The Stranger

    Our story opens with an Algerian character named Meursault. The first major scene in the book

    takes place with Meursault leaving Algiers because his mother has died. Meursault is going to a town

    where his mother has been living in a type of retirement home. In asking himself whether sending his

    mother to the nursing home was the right thing to do, Meursault apparently decided at one point that it

    would be best to send his mother to this nursing home because she needed carein his words, they

    reached a point where they did not communicate. Being at the nursing home causes a caretaker to ask

    Meursault about his deceased mother; here we begin to see that Meursault is quite unresponsive to the

    caretakers questions. This is our first impression that Meursault is an outsider. Instead of talking to thecaretaker about his deceased mother, Meursault is very attentive to immediate circumstances. He is

    very aware of details such as cigarettes and the heat; however, he does not seem to give much attention

    to the caretakers questions. Again, these oddities suggest that Meursault lives outside of normal

    routines. In the next scene, Meursault attends a vigil and again we see that what seem to be of most

    concern to Meursault are his immediate surroundings and not the rituals of the vigil. We will see

    throughout the course of the book that Meursaults lack of interest in rituals makes him appear to be

    quite an outsider. Alas, even the next episode (Meursaults trip to his mothers funeral) shows that

    Meursault may be there for the ceremony but he seems to be attending to the details of immediate

    circumstances more than the event that is taking place. Meursault is an outsider at his own mothers

    funeral.

    Next, Meursault returns to Algiers. Upon returning we see that Meursault is somewhat

    concerned about the fact that he has taken off from work; Meursault is concerned about his boss.

    Eventually we learn that he is not too concerned about work because he does not take part in the so-

    called rat race; that is, his boss offers him a good job in Paris, but Meursault is not inclined to take it

    as an outsider at work, Meursault does not participate in the rat race ritual.

  • 8/13/2019 Philosophy and Literature Essays

    7/10

    In the next scene, Meursault goes to the beach where he meets a girl from his officeMarie.

    Marie and Meursault appear to hit it off; they joke, they play, and they appear to enjoy each others

    company. In fact, Meursault has so much fun that he ends up going to see a comedy moviea day after

    his Mothers funeral. Later in the story, this scene will play a crucial role in showing that Meursault is an

    outsider. That is, How could anyone but an outsider want to have such fun and take in a comedy movie

    a day after their mothers funeral? Eventually Marie and Meursault hit it off so well that Marie asks

    Meursault if he wants to get married. Meursault, again, not seeming too enthused by rituals, seems to

    accept the idea with apathy. He does not see what marriage will add to his and Maries relationship, but

    he obliges her. Meursaults approach to life is to avoid partaking in rituals.

    The next big scene introduces a character named Raymond. Raymond apparently lives near

    where Meursault lives. Raymond views Meursault with a certain regard or admirationin fact,

    Raymond expresses to Meursault how Raymond wants to be Meursaultsfriend. Again, showing that

    Meursault does not participate in rituals, we see that Meursault finds it curious how Raymond feels the

    need to label their relationship as friends. However, Meursault comes across as obliging. Here we get

    the sense that Meursault is kind of an outsider. That is, because Meursault does not participate inrituals but does seem pretty intrigued by those who do, we get the impression that Meursault is on the

    outside looking in at all those ritualistic individuals. We see this again during the next scene when

    Meursault goes to Celestes and has dinner by himself. While eating, Meursault notices a woman sitting

    at another table filling out a list (a radio schedule) and making exact change while eating. The woman

    properly stacks her change and is ready to pay before she finishes eating. This so-called robot woman

    provides a contrast to Meursaults non-participation in rituals; however, again we see that Meursault is

    fascinated by the robot womans behaviorso fascinated he even follows her down the street. We may

    ask ourselves what the robot woman is doing in the scene; theres a definite sense that shes the

    opposite of Meursault. Meursault is not someone who plans his stuff the way the robot woman plans

    hers.

    One of the main reoccurrences with Meursault is that we see him observingbut not actually

    taking part inritualistic routines. For example, at his Mothers funeral, Meursault just observed.

    This was not to show that Meursault is a callous person (in fact, we saw that he feels bad about sending

    his mother to the nursing home); but, because Meursault does not participate in rituals and only

    observes (to the detriment of what people may think about him) we see that Meursault is indeed kind of

    an outsider. As an outsider he does not find rituals compelling or meaningful because Meursault does

    not feel that these rituals add anything to life. Accordingly, there is even a sense that, to Meursault,

    these rituals may even detract from his being alive. This is quite contrary to the robot woman from

    above, who seems to live her life around ritualistic behavior. On this matter, however, two pointsshould be noted: first, Meursault does not participate in ritualistic behavior and second, Meursault does

    not seem to find such ritualistic behavior objectionable. We see evidence of this with Meursaults

    relationship with his neighbor Salamano; that is, though Meursault finds Salamanos relationship with

    his dog as being ritualistic, Meursault does not seem to be bothered by Salamanohe even attempts to

    console Salamano when his dog runs away.

  • 8/13/2019 Philosophy and Literature Essays

    8/10

  • 8/13/2019 Philosophy and Literature Essays

    9/10

    In the following scene we are experience the trial and we experience the aftermath of the trial.

    The cast of characters from Meursaults life appear to be at the trial to provide Meursault a proper

    defense; however, there are other characters that we have not met. In particular we are introduced to

    a young journalist; this young journalist helps to show Meursault as outsidernow it is the journalists

    turn to do the observing and to cast Meursault as somehow different from everything else in life. When

    the prosecution opens the trial they refer to Meursault as a born killerattempting to make him this

    sociopathic outsider. By casting Meursault as this horrific outsider, the prosecution (along with a

    shoddy defense) has made it a virtual sure thing that Meursault will be convicted of first degree murder.

    The next step will be Meursaults sentencing. The aftermath of the trial and sentencing (where

    Meursault is condemned to be executed) shows a Meursault who does not dwell on an appeal. The only

    real emotion we see out of Meursault is his explosive behavior to the chaplain regarding the existence of

    God. Again, we are reminded that Meursault does not partake in rituals, thus confirming the fact that

    Meursault is an outsider.

    To understand how Meursault is an outsider, we must understand what he has learned from this

    experience. For one, Meursault has learned that he is a man who does not participate in rituals andthat, because so, his reactions to things are not ritualized. Meursault feels that social rituals, religious

    rituals, and personal rituals (such as with the robot woman) all compromise Meursaults sense of

    being alive. Though he is interested in these rituals, he does not participate; he is, as it were, an

    outsider.

    Meursault is a man who does not participate in rituals according to long range commitments but

    gets convicted for murder because of how people see him. He lives outside of the ritualized system;

    however, he is going to be killed because of not participating. People see his outsider behavior as

    sociopathic and so he gets convicted of murder; he gets convicted of murder because he did not cry at

    his mothers funeral. He is convicted of murder despite that fact that he does not get involved incommitments. He devotes his whole life to immediate circumstances, where he finds his own sense of

    being alive, and he gets convicted of murder because of the way other people see him.

    Meursault finds a certain absurdity in the fact that he has made his life in a manner that does

    not involve commitments and even so, he gets condemned to death on the basis of how people see him.

    All of this leaves Meursault to realize the conclusion that the world he finds himself in is not necessarily

    on his side. Though Meursault is largely trying to stay out of the way he gets convicted of first degree

    murder on the basis of how people see him. Apparently the world is not made for Meursault and the

    world does not have much to do with him. Indeed, Meursault is an outsider even to the world. On the

    other hand, the fact that Meursault finds that the world is not set up for him, Merursault finds a sense

    of liberty; there is a certain sense of freedom that relates to a kind of kinship Meursault has with the

    world. So, we see that the world we find ourselves in is not necessary benignand it may even be

    indifferent; however, Meursault finds a certain kinship with this indifference. This kinship is a source of

    happiness for Meursault.

  • 8/13/2019 Philosophy and Literature Essays

    10/10

    So, if Meursault is happy at this point of being an outsider (because it brings him some sort of

    affinity for the world) he has been happy all along. This is yet another variation on how human beings

    find themselves and whether or not they have a distinct place in the world.

    Thanks to Wayne Froman for the questions.