Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Philadelphia Continuum of Care
Board Meeting Minutes
Date: Wednesday, May 18, 2016
Time: 2:00 – 4:00 P.M.
Location: Office of Housing and Community Development (OHCD)
1234 Market Street, 17th
Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19107
Voting Members in Attendance:
Nonprofit Homeless Housing Providers:
Beth Hagan Action AIDS
John Ducoff Covenant House PA
Steve Culbertson Impact Services Corp. and CoC Board Co-Chair
Rob Harrison Stenton Family Manor
Government Agencies:
Sharee Heaven and Gary Tumolo Office of Housing and Community Development
Stephanie Pastula Philadelphia Housing Authority
Casey McCollum Philadelphia VA Medical Center
Katrina Pratt-Roebuck Mayor’s Office of Community Empowerment and Opportunity
Marcella Maguire, Bridgette Tobler Department of Behavioral Health and Intellectual DisAbilities
Persons with Lived Experience:
Emmalee Smith
Non-Voting Members in Attendance:
Beverly Woods City of Philadelphia Health and Human Services
Joe Willard CoC Advisory Committee and Project HOME
Voting Members Absent:
Persons with Lived Experience:
Nyfiece Carter
Jerry Tucker
Community Stakeholders:
Bon Ku Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
Susan Sherman Independence Foundation
Office of Homeless Services Staff in Attendance:
Michelle Butler
Roberta Cancellier
Dorothy Haug
David Holloman
Michele Mangan
William McIntyre
Lauren Whitleigh
Dept. of Behavioral Health and Intellectual disability Services Staff in Attendance:
Bridgette Tobler
Maria Anies
James Chun
2
Background Materials: The following materials were sent to the Board via email: March 23rd
Meeting
Minutes; Updated February 3rd
Meeting Minutes; Summary of Philadelphia’s 2016 Point in Time and Housing
Inventory Counts; Updated Philadelphia CoC Board Terms of Service;.
Materials Distributed at Meeting: Meeting Agenda; Meeting Presentation Slides; Background Materials;
Philadelphia’s 2016 Housing Inventory Chart and 2007-2016 Housing Inventory Trends
Welcome, Introductions, and Community Meeting
Steve Culbertson began the meeting at 2:07pm with introductions and a community meeting.
Approval of March 2016 Meeting Minutes
Steve presented minutes from the March 23, 2016 Board meeting for discussion.
Debate:
Beth Hagan reported she was inaccurately recorded as present at the March 23rd
meeting.
VOTE:
Stephanie Pastula motioned for the approval of the March 23, 2016 meeting minutes, with the corrected
attendance noted. Gary Tumolo seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.
Coordinated Entry
William McIntyre presented that after the 2-day planning session held in March, the Office of Homeless
Services Coordinate Entry Planning team expanded its roster to include stakeholders from city departments,
current referring agencies, and select providers. William presented information regarding Philadelphia’s
Coordinated Entry System: guiding principles, goals, and the roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders
involved in the planning and implementation of the Coordinated Entry System. Additional information can be
found in Appendix C. Steve Culbertson requested clear timelines and pushing up the timeline to launch
Coordinated Entry as soon as possible.
HMIS
William McIntyre presented that HMIS is going live on May 23rd
with Phase 1a of Implementation (Permanent
Supportive Housing, Transitional Housing, and Rapid Re-Housing programs). William presented that in
preparation for the May 23rd
go-live date, Homeless Services is hosting refresher trainings for program staff.
William presented that since the March Board meeting, the HMIS vendor changed hands and is now Ecovia
Solutions. The name of the HMIS system remains ClientTrack™.
John Ducoff questioned William about staffing the HMIS unit. William responded by reporting that Homeless
Services has received funding to hire 3 additional HMIS positions: 1 Reports Manager, 1 Technical Assistance/
Help Desk position, and 1 Trainer.
Philadelphia’s New Outreach Strategy
Bridgette Tobler presented information about Philadelphia’s New Outreach Strategy. Bridgette presented that
there will be a higher concentration of Outreach workers in center city areas, such as Suburban Station,
Convention Center, and Independence Hall, during commuter/ rush hour. Bridgette presented that Outreach
workers will be wearing bright orange shirts with the Outreach Hotline printed on the back of the shirts to be
more visible to the public. This new outreach strategy is more strategic, focuses on education, and is increasing
collaboration with businesses. Some businesses will have a sign-in log for Outreach workers to sign when they
check in throughout the day. Bridgette reports Outreach teams will continue to work their specific zones
outside of the commuter/ rush hour. Bridgette presented that there will be one additional outreach team, a One
Day at a Time (ODAAT) team. Bridgette reported that Outreach’s inability to park its vans downtown poses
3
barriers; possible strategies include adding Outreach vans to the Parking Authority’s inventory of “Do Not
Ticket” vehicles or having more outreach workers on foot. It was added that there are youth specific Outreach
teams in the city (Valley Youth House, Covenant House, and Youth Emergency Services), who might also be
experiencing the same difficulties related to parking. Steve Culbertson asked if Outreach had explored alternate
modes of transportation, such as bikes. Bridgette reported Kensington is always a priority, and Outreach can
always use more teams.
Voices of Youth Count
Roberta presented information about the Voices of Youth Count qualitative study and enumeration taking place
this summer. Roberta presented that there will be focus groups with youth, including one with the School
District of Philadelphia the week of July 11th
; up to 40 qualitative interviews that will explore the youth’s life
history; and a youth-led enumeration on August 2nd
and 3rd. Roberta presented that there is funding available
for youth who participate in the focus groups, qualitative interviews, and youth-led enumeration. Roberta
announced upcoming meetings: community update meeting on June 7th
, 10 a.m. at MSB and a focus group
recruitment/planning meeting on June 15th
.
100-Day Street Homelessness Challenge
Steve Culbertson presented information about the progress made to date by the CoC Board Planning Committee
for the 100-Day Street Homelessness Challenge/ “sprint.” Steve presented that the 100-Day “Sprint” will
launch on June 20th
and 21st at the College of Physicians of Philadelphia. Steve presented that the goal of the
June 21st planning session is to establish concrete 100 days goals for each focus area (Chronically street, Non-
Chronically Street, and Youth Street) with an eye to "ending" homelessness in each of these areas; the first step
is gathering the necessary data. Steve presented that the planning process is being facilitated by Meaghan
Messner of Rapid Results Institute, identified through a competitive RFQ process; Meaghan played a facilitator
role in Philadelphia’s Veterans Boot Camp.
Roberta presented that this 100-Day Street Homelessness Challenge will lead into a comprehensive strategic
planning process. Roberta reported that Liz Hersh has invited the Family Service Provider Network to tour
Homeless Service’s Appletree Family Intake Center to dialogue about family homelessness.
HUD CoC Program Funding: 2015 Awards
Michelle Butler presented a summary of the funding the Philadelphia CoC was awarded in the FY 2015
Competition, which included all renewal projects as well as 2 new family Rapid Re-Housing projects (55 units)
and 1 new Permanent Supportive Housing project for chronically homelessness individuals (60 units).
Requested Amount Awarded Amount Difference
Renewal Projects $29,228,996 $30,099,302 $870,306
New Projects $5,203,165 $4,491,025 ($712,140)
CoC Planning $931,805 $931,805 $0
TOTAL $35,363,966 $35,522,132 +$158,166
Michelle presented a recap of the HUD CoC FY 2015 Competition to present why Philadelphia did so well in
the competition. Key points were that HUD aligned the CoC competition with the goals and strategies of
Opening Doors, the competition is more competitive and focused on performance, CoCs are expected to be
more actively engaged in managing and overseeing their projects, strategic resource allocation to housing
strategies that are more cost effective is key, and ensure housing programs are using Housing First Approach.
Tier 2 funding depended heavily on CoC-wide performance, and the newly funded projects will house more
people than the projects that lost funding. Some communities, including at least four large cities, had funding
4
reduced by 5 to 8 percent. Some individual programs that were effective still lost funding due to problems with
their CoC application or idiosyncrasies of the program or the competition rules.
HUD CoC FY 2016 Priorities for New Projects
Roberta Cancellier reported that the Quality Improvement and Evaluation Subcommittee weighed in on the
priorities for new projects for the FY 2016 competition. Roberta reported that the QIES suggested that there be
no limit on the funding amount a new project can request. Historically, we have limited the supportive services
budget to 20% of the total funding request. The QIES suggested lifting this cap for new projects, with the
understanding that Homeless Services may ask the organization to scale up or scale down the proposed project.
Historically, we limited the number of new projects an organization could submit proposals for. The QIES
suggested allowing organizations to submit multiple proposals.
John Ducoff asked that since HUD is not making new funding available for transitional housing, is there a
concerted effort to have more Transitional Housing projects serve youth 18-24 since HUD recognizes TH as an
effective intervention for youth 18-24. Roberta Cancellier reported there is an effort to use Transitional
Housing for the populations it is effective for (People in recovery, people fleeing domestic violence, and youth
18-24). Roberta reported that unless the Transitional Housing project is low-performing, Homeless Services
isn’t looking to convert or eliminate any additional TH.
Steve Culbertson recommended that we pair up our RFP for new projects with DHCD’s RFP process. Roberta
responded that DHCD’s timing is much later than our CoC timeline for new projects. Steve requested that there
be a more interactive process to have a direct coordination of development projects. Katrina Roebuck shared
that the HOME tax credit takes place in January and the DHCD RFP process takes place in November. Katrina
suggested that one thing we could do is give more points to DHCD proposals for projects that target certain
priority populations (people experiencing homelessness).
VOTE: Steve Culbertson motioned to approve the Quality Improvement and Evaluation Subcommittee
recommendations for the RFP for new CoC Program funded Permanent Supportive Housing and Rapid Re-
Housing projects: no limit to funding amount requested, lifting the 20% cap on supportive services costs, and no
limit on the number of proposals a single organization can submit. Emmalee Smith and Gary Tumolo seconded
the motion. The motion passed with 8 ayes (Stephanie Pastula, Emmalee Smith, Casey McCollum, Marcella
Maguire, Sharee Heaven, Beth Hagan, Katrina Roebuck, Rob Harrison), 0 nays, and 2 abstentions (Steve
Culbertson and John Ducoff).
2016 Philadelphia CoC Point in Time and Housing Inventory Counts
Michele Mangan presented information summarizing the number of households experiencing homelessness on a
single night in Philadelphia on the night of January 27, 2016. Specific details found in Appendix A.
Philadelphia’s 2016 Consolidated Action Plan
HUD requires state and local governments receiving annual block grants for community development and
affordable housing to develop a Consolidated Plan. The Office of Homeless Services provides DHCD with the
required information related to homelessness: Sections AP-10 Consultation with the Continuum of Care, AP-65
Homeless and Special-Needs Activities, and AP-90 Program-Specific Requirements – ESG (found at
http://www.phila.gov/dhcd/publications/consolidated-plan/current-consolidated-plan/). Roberta Cancellier
presented information about an increase in Emergency Solutions Grant funding from FY 2015 to FY 2016.
FY 2016 Emergency Solutions Grant Allocation
Activity Allocation
Emergency Shelter $1,603,290
5
Rapid Re-Housing $1,392,201
Data Collection/ HMIS $255,832
Administration $263,621
Total $3,514,843
CoC Board Election
Sharee Heaven presented information about the FY 2016 Board member selection process. Sharee described
how in order to recruit applicants for the vacancies for individuals currently or formerly experiencing
homelessness, the Nominating Subcommittee of the CoC sent electronically to all organizations that operate
emergency housing, transitional housing, rapid re-housing, safe haven, or permanent supportive housing
programs in the Philadelphia CoC the following materials to use to recruit applicants: an informational flier
about the CoC Board and application process, and the Board Application form.
To recruit applicants for the vacancies for the Community Stakeholder seat, the Nominating Subcommittee
developed an invitation list of organizations based on the priorities of the CoC Board: substance abuse service
provider, human trafficking victim service provider, child welfare service provider, legal services provider, and
returning citizens service provider. The Nominating Subcommittee sent to said organizations the following: a
letter from CoC Board Co-Chairs Liz Hersh and Steve Culbertson inviting them to submit an application for the
CoC Board, and the CoC Board Application Form.
The Philadelphia CoC received 22 applications from individuals currently or formerly experiencing
homelessness and 8 applications from Community Stakeholders. The CoC Nominating Subcommittee
developed an application scoring tool to review and score board applications. Scoring for individuals currently
or formerly experiencing homelessness was based on applicant’s narratives responses regarding why he/she
wants to be a member of the CoC Board, what skills and experiences he/she brings to the Board, and his/her
ability to make the time commitment required to be a CoC Board member. Scoring for individual organizations
applying for the community stakeholder seat was based on the type of organization, the homeless populations
served by the organization, and the applicant’s narrative responses regarding why he/she wants to be a member
of the CoC Board, what skills and expertise the applicant brings to the table, the boards and/or coalitions the
applicant serves on, and his/her ability to make the time commitment required to be a CoC Board member.
Applications were de-identified, and independently reviewed and scored by members of the Nominating
Subcommittee. The final score for each application was the average of the independent scores. Sharee handed
out to each Board member a slate of four candidates representing the highest scoring applicants for each
respective seat:
Katherine Champlin (representing youth under 25)
Sheila Armstrong (representing families with children)
James Womer (representing single males)
Paul Boyd, Belmont Behavioral Hospital (representing Community Stakeholder)
Each Board member had to check the box next to the candidate to approve his/her nomination. The slates were
collected and votes tallied. Katherine Champlin received 10 out of 10 possible votes. Sheila Armstrong
received 10 out of 10 possible votes. James Womer received 9 out of 10 possible votes, and Paul Boyd received
10 out of 10 possible votes.
VOTE:
6
Steve Culbertson motioned to approve the appointment of the 4 individuals to the CoC Board. Rob Harrison
seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.
Update:
Paul Boyd (Belmont Behavioral Hospital) passed away in May 2016. The Nominating Subcommittee
recommended the second highest scoring substance abuse treatment provider, Traci Nesmith of Resources for
Human Development, to the Board, in place of Mr. Boyd. A vote was called via email, and the motion to
appoint Traci Nesmith to the CoC Board passed.
Street Change Presentation
Dan Treglia, Research Fellow at the University of Pennsylvania’s School of Social Policy and Practice
and a Researcher at the Department of Veterans Affairs’ National Center on Homelessness among
Veterans, presented StreetChangePhilly to the CoC Board. StreetChange is an app that allows people
walking or driving through Center City Philadelphia to make very targeted donations to items
specifically requested and needed by individuals experiencing street homelessness, and those
individuals, as a result of their participation in the program and receiving donations, are engaged in case
management to move them toward permanent housing. More information can be found at
http://www.streetchangephilly.org/how-streetchange-works/
Adjourn
Steve Culbertson motioned to adjourn at 4:00pm. Rob Harrison seconded the motion. The motion passed
unanimously.
Proposed 2016-2017 Calendar
Wednesday, July 13, 2016, 2:00-4:00pm
Wednesday, September 21, 2016, 2:00-4:00pm
Wednesday, November 9, 2016, 2:00-4:00pm
Wednesday, January 18, 2017, 2:00-4:00pm
Wednesday, March 22, 2017, 2:00-4:00pm
Wednesday, May 17, 2017, 2:00-4:00pm
7
Appendix A – Presentation Slides
8
9
10
11
12
Appendix B - Philadelphia CoC Coordinated Entry System 1
Vision Philadelphia’s Coordinated Entry System (CES) will ensure individuals and families at-risk of or experiencing 2 homelessness have access to a streamlined and standardized process that links households to appropriate resources to end 3 their housing crisis. 4
Guiding Principles 5 1. Housing First – households at-risk of or experiencing 6
homelessness are housed quickly without preconditions or service 7 participation requirements 8
2. Housing Focused – assistance provided to households at-risk of 9 or experiencing homelessness is focused on moving to and 10 maintaining permanent housing 11
3. Prioritization – assistance is prioritized based on vulnerability 12 and severity of service needs to ensure households needing help 13 the most receive it in a timely manner 14
4. Person-Centered – a trauma-informed approach that is dignified, 15 safe, and incorporates participant choice is utilized 16
Goals 17 1. Assistance is allocated effectively and households are linked to 18
the most appropriate intervention strategy 19
2. Reduction in number of households experiencing homelessness 20
3. Reduced length of time a households experiences homelessness 21
4. Reduced returns to homelessness (recidivism) 22
Roles and Responsibilities 23
Lead design,
implementation, and
evaluation processes
Office of Homeless Services Coordinated Entry System Planning Team
Deputy Directors of Emergency Housing,
Housing Information Systems, and CoC
Planning and Long-Term Housing
Director of Chronic Homelessness
HMIS Lead
CES Project Manager
Assist with design,
implementation, and
evaluation processes
*Represented on CoC
Board
** Represented on
CoC Advisory
Committee
Coordinated Entry System Workgroup
OHS CES Planning Team
City of Phila AIDS Activity Coordinating Office, Dept. of Behavioral Health & Intellectual disAbility Services*, and Dept. of Human Services**
Philadelphia VA Medical Center*
Providers: Bethesda Project**; Gaudenzia**; One Day At A Time (ODAAT), People’s Emergency Center**; Project HOME**; Self, Inc.; Valley Youth House**; and Women Against Abuse**
Provide feedback on
feasibility of design,
implementation, and
evaluation processes
Implementation Experts
Program participants
Homeless assistance service and housing
providers
CoC Advisory Committee
Street Outreach Teams
City Agency Staff (AACO, DBHIDS,
DHS, and OHS)
What is a Coordinated Entry
System (CES)?
A process designed to coordinate
program participant access,
assessment, and referrals to
homeless assistance services and
housing.
Who Benefits?
Households experiencing a
housing crisis
Homeless assistance service
providers
Administrators and funders
For more information, contact: Sara Pagni City of Philadelphia Office of Homeless Services [email protected]
13
Coordinated Entry System Development Process
Phase When What Who
Project
Planning
Jan – May
2016
Develop Coordinated Entry System Vision, Guiding Principles, Goals, and Scope
Create map of how households currently enter and flow through the homeless assistance system
Conduct initial design session
Establish stakeholder feedback mechanisms
Create CES Workgroup
OHS CES Planning Team
Design June – Aug
2016
Finalize design decisions regarding:
o How the system will be accessed
o How households will be assessed
o How households will be referred to appropriate intervention
o Who will be responsible for macro-level oversight
CES Workgroup
Provide input on design decisions Implementation Experts
Implementation
Planning
Sept – Dec 2016
Create plan for how CES will be phased in
Assess current system function and capacity to determine what will need to change
Develop or adopt assessment tools
Review HMIS capabilities and identify data needs
Determine how the system and services are monitored, held accountable, and evaluated; policies, procedures, forms, MOUs needed; staffing, training, and technology needs; and operating costs and funding sources
CES Workgroup
Provide feedback Implementation Experts
Implementation Jan – Mar 2017
Obtain/increase resources
Adjust eligibility criteria and funding requirements to support coordinated entry
Create and document written standards, procedures and policies for referral process, policies for program participants and partner organizations; and data sharing protocols
Create forms and referral workflows in HMIS
CES Workgroup
Provide feedback Implementation Experts
Mar – Apr 2017
Develop MOUs/amend existing contracts
Provide training on new policies, procedures, assessment tools, technology systems, etc. CES Workgroup
Phased Launch Apr – May
2017 Begin CES launch in a phased approach
Project Planning Design Implementation
Planning Implementation Phased Launch
Monitor and Evaluate
14
Appendix C - Philadelphia Continuum of Care Point-in-Time Count Trends 2011 - 2016
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Total # of persons experiencing homelessness 6180 5780 5645 5738 5998 6112
# of Persons in Households without Children experiencing homelessness
3328 2976 3070 3109 3346 3407
# of Persons in Households with Children experiencing homelessness
2852 2804 2575 2629 2652 2682
# of Households with Children experiencing homelessness
918 923 911 932 906 885
Sheltered persons 5674 5280 5119 5377 5328 5407
Unsheltered persons 506 500 526 361 670 705
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
Philadelphia Point-in-Time Count of Persons Experiencing Homelessness 2011 - 2016
15
Philadelphia Continuum of Care 2016 Point-in-Time Count
Households with Dependent Children
Emergency Housing Transitional Housing Safe Haven Unsheltered† Total
Number of Households 462 423 0 0 885
Number of Persons 1,482 1,200 0 0 2,682
Households without Dependent Children
Emergency Housing Transitional Housing Safe Haven Unsheltered† Total
Number of Households 2,144 469 77 696 3,386
Number of Persons 2,154 471 77 705 3,407
Households with ONLY Children (under 18 years of age)
Emergency Housing Transitional Housing Safe Haven Unsheltered† Total
Number of Households 20 1 0 0 21
Number of Persons 20 3 0 0 23
All Households/ All Persons
Emergency Housing Transitional Housing Safe Haven Unsheltered† Total
Total Households 2,626 893 77 696 4,292
Total Persons 3,656 1,674 77 705 6,112
‡Subpopulation data does not include households in permanent housing
Emergency Housing Transitional Housing Safe Haven Unsheltered† Total
Chronically Homeless Individuals 295 77 402 774
Chronically Homeless Families (Total Persons in Household) 79 0 79
Sheltered (EH+TH+SH) Unsheltered Total Percent
Youth 18-24 527 25 552 13% Severely Mentally Ill 1387 375 1762 41% Chronic Substance Abuse 1487 364 1851 43% Veterans 276 17 293 7% Persons with HIV/AIDS 103 66 169 4% Victims of Domestic Violence (includes
families and singles) 469 469 11%
16
Philadelphia CoC 2016 Point-in-Time Count Population Tables
Emergency
Housing
Transitional
Housing
Safe
Haven
Unsheltered TOTAL
Chronically Homeless 295 0 77 402 774
Youth 18-24 172 65 0 25 262
Severely Mentally Ill 947 166 77 375 1565
Chronic Substance Abuse 1076 242 46 364 1728
Veterans 111 162 3 17 293
Persons with HIV/AIDS 88 7 6 66 167
Victims of Domestic Violence 154 22 19 195
Chronic Health Condition 438 128 45 611
Physical Disability 81 12 13 106
Employed 237 83 1 321
Philadelphia CoC 2016 PIT Count – Households with Children
Emergency
Housing
Transitional
Housing TOTAL
Chronically Homeless 79 0 79
Parenting Youth 18-24 146 144 290
Severely Mentally Ill 119 78 197
Chronic Substance Abuse 70 53 123
Veterans 0 0 0
Persons with HIV/AIDS 1 1 2
Victims of Domestic Violence 124 150 274
Chronic Health Condition 44 25 69
Physical Disability 2 14 16
Employed 86 117 203
17
Philadelphia CoC 2016 PIT Count – Households without Children
Emergency Housing
Transitional Housing
Safe Haven
Unsheltered TOTAL
Chronically Homeless 14% 0% 100% 57% 23%
Youth 18-24 8% 14% 0% 4% 8%
Severely Mentally Ill 44% 35% 100% 53% 46%
Chronic Substance Abuse
50% 51% 60% 52% 51%
Veterans 5% 34% 4% 2% 9%
Persons with HIV/AIDS
4% 1% 8% 9% 5%
Victims of Domestic Violence
7% 5% 25% 6%
Chronic Health Condition
20% 27% 58% 18%
Physical Disability 4% 3% 17% 3%
Employed 11% 18% 1%
9%
18
Philadelphia CoC 2016 PIT Count –
Households with Children Subpopulation Data
Emergency
Housing
Transitional
Housing TOTAL
Chronically Homeless 5% 5%
Parenting Youth 18-24 32% 34% 33%
Severely Mentally Ill 26% 18% 22%
Chronic Substance Abuse 15% 13% 14%
Veterans 0% 0% 0%
Persons with HIV/AIDS 0% 0% 0%
Victims of Domestic Violence 27% 35% 31%
Chronic Health Condition 10% 6% 8%
Physical Disability 0% 3% 2%
Employed 19% 28% 23%
19
Philadelphia Continuum of Care Housing Inventory Count Trends 2011 - 2016
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Emergency 3727 3387 3428 3644 3666 3768
Safe Haven 70 70 115 115 115 85
Transitional 2306 2293 1998 1929 1956 1843
Rapid Re-Housing 1352 781 672 612 931 759
Permanent 4732 4840 5409 5502 5808 6046
Total Year-Round Beds 12187 11371 11622 11802 12476 12501
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
# Year-Round Beds, All Households, 2011 - 2016
20
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Beds HH w/ Children 2877 2904 3237 3211 3454 3447
Units HH w/ Children 847 878 972 953 1041 1010
Beds HH w/o Children 1855 1933 2172 2291 2354 2599
Beds HH w/only Children 3 0 0 0 0
CH Beds 646 1034 900 1138 1497 1389
Total Beds 4732 4840 5409 5502 5808 6046
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
Permanent Housing Inventory 2011 - 2016 (includes PSH, VA, and PHA housing)
21
2013 2014 2015 2016
Beds HH w/ Children 1541 1604 1655 1562
Units HH w/ Children 516 459 484 450
Beds HH w/o Children 1855 2020 1991 2181
Beds HH w/only Children 32 20 20 25
Total Beds 3428 3644 3666 3768
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
Emergency Housing Inventory 2013-2016
22
2013 2014 2015 2016
Beds HH w/ Children 1365 1386 1394 1306
Units HH w/ Children 478 480 484 461
Beds HH w/o Children 663 543 562 537
Beds HH w/only Children 0 0 0 0
Total Beds 2028 1929 1956 1843
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Transitional Housing Inventory 2013 - 2016
23