Upload
delilah-bridges
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Dynamic PricingDéjà vu all over again – or brave new
world?Phil Evans
!Personal capacity – personal opinions!Senior Consultant Fipra
Member – UK Competition Commission
What is dynamic pricing?Dynamic pricing
charging consumers different prices for the same product or service depending on particular characteristics of the transaction or the
consumers.Consumer characteristics?
Souk – reading people - hagglingOld – location, age, previous purchasesNew – any factor with data attached
New location IP tracking to segment markets – e.g. travel, car hire, downloads
BUT need to view with link into:Personalised pricing
The Souk with information asymmetries!Algorithmic competition
Stock market trade tech in retail markets
Where do we see dynamic pricing?Travel – airline, train, road tolls
Yield management, peak/off peak pricingProfiling? Saturday night stay, FFPs, season tickets
Sports – time and profile specificSeason tickets, advance purchase discounts, bundlesProfiling – ‘fans’ – occasional purchasersSee www.qcue.com
Loyalty cardsCoupons, targeted discounts
Sales/discounting/product retail cyclesLaunch of new games/products
Why does dynamic pricing exist?‘Bums on seats’ – maximise per seat revenue for
time limited productsDifferent consumers have different ‘willingness to
pay’/price sensitivityBank revenue in advance on fixed cost facilities –
season ticketsEncourage loyalty and repeat custom: loyalty cardsMaximise profit from individual sales
Effectively catch everyone on the demand curveProducts have a price life cycle – start expensive,
then come down in price
Déjà vu or brave new world?From: Déjà vu – quid pro quo markets – dynamic pricing
Travel, sports, retailer loyalty cardsTo: Willingness-to-pay markets – dynamic/personalised
pricingIncreasing online sophistication‘Big Data’ gets personal
Upside offers for regular purchase items, related items, advance
offers, items of interestDownside
Poor targeting, ‘unfairness’, favoured and unfavoured, regressive pricing, need to game system
Examples?Tesco Clubcard
Personalised coupons based on Clubcard dataAmazon 2000 DVD experiment
Mapped ability to pay by profiling purchase history and residence among other factors.
Displayed different pricing results based on browser used.Orbitz 2012
Noticed Mac users spent ave of 30% more on hotel roomsSo displayed higher priced rooms if you use a Mac
Expedia – car rental International Business Timescar rentals in San Francisco between Sept. 1 and Sept. 8 UK VPN - $311 US VPN similar search $1,118.
The future? ‘Minority Report’ problem• ‘Personalised’ advertising triggered by eyeball scanning technology
• Eyeball scanning patented and being tested• More likely ‘general’ personalised advertising using gender, age profiling• RFID scanners likely – personal info being read by scanners linked to advertising
• May not work! • the ‘racist camera’• scanning mistaking men for women etc• poor targeting – buy cough sweets get offered pregnancy test (personal case: eBay)• Yves Rocher – convinced I am a woman – ‘you too are a Queen’!• Google – convinced I need a discrete male catheter (sports/age profiling?)
• Consumer acceptance• the mildly embarrassing – haemorrhoid cream• the really embarrassing - see Target right
Forbes: 16/2/2012: How Target Figured Out A Teen Girl Was Pregnant Before Her Father Did
Brave new world?Dynamic+personalised pricing changes things
‘Fair’ trade off markets based on quid-pro-quo‘Unfair’ targeted markets based on ‘revealed consumer
WTP+information asymmetry’Bit like visiting the Souk and every trader knowing
exactly what you have bought in the past, how much you paid, what you liked/disliked, the names of all your kids, friends, favourite bands – while you know nothing about them
Dynamic/personalised pricing meet algorithmic competitionCompetition requires consumers to notice price cutting
by retailer A which triggers retailer BBUT if A and B use algorithms to track discounting –
consumer cannot reward A and so incentive to cut prices generally disappears
ImplicationsPrice discrimination needs
Market power (does info in DP/PP give every seller power?)
Understanding of consumer reference pricing (definitely)
Ability to stop arbitrage (no –other vertical restraints can)
Dynamic pricingEveryone can generally access the different pricing
Dynamic/personalised pricingEveryone gets a different price at different timesBuilt on asymmetric informationBuilt on untransparent personal data and modellingUnequal access and not necessary to have quid-pro-quo
ConclusionsDynamic pricing
Common, quid-pro-quo; consumers ‘learn’/predict most markets
Dynamic/personalised pricingExperiments 10 yrs+ BUT Big Data facilitates greater useAsymmetric info undermines quid-pro-quo of DP
Dynamic/personalised pricing + algorithmic competition?Price discrimination to the nth degree?No anonymous behaviour/shopping/transparency/consumer
learning/reference pricingTwo fundamental problems to address:
Whose data is it anyway? Someone else is monetising my personal data can I license it/sell it
Is this ‘fair’? Fairness in consumer transactions important legal and societal
issue