Upload
michael-d-madritch
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Phenotypic variation in oak litter influences short- and long-term
nutrient cycling through litter chemistry
Michael D. Madritch*, Mark D. Hunter
Institute of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-2202, USA
Received 18 February 2004; received in revised form 8 July 2004; accepted 3 August 2004
Abstract
The influence of intraspecific variation on ecosystem functioning is relatively unknown. We investigated the effects of litter phenotype on
carbon and nitrogen fluxes in the litter and soil, and on microarthropod and bacterial populations over a 3-year period. Different litter
phenotypes significantly affected carbon and nitrogen fluxes. Short- and long-term fluxes within single phenotype treatments were
significantly, but unpredictably, different from a mixed phenotype treatment. Fluxes were associated with variation in litter chemistry which
has a significant genetic component. We found no effects of phenotype identity on soil bacterial or microarthropod communities. However,
persistent litter phenotype effects upon carbon and nitrogen fluxes support our previous suggestion that losses in genetic diversity may
influence ecosystem processes.
q 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Ecosystem functioning; Intraspecific variation; Decomposition; Tannin
1. Introduction
The species composition of terrestrial ecosystems can
have important ecosystem level consequences, and species
identity and diversity both play important roles in regulating
ecosystem functions (see McCann (2000), Loreau et al.
(2001), Cameron (2002) and Naeem (2002) for reviews). The
vast majority of net primary production eventually enters the
detrital pathway (Coleman and Crossley, 1996), yet we know
very little concerning how tree species composition affects
litter decomposition. Species composition typically has
significant, yet idiosyncratic effects on litter decomposition,
and non-additive effects are usually the result of specific
species combinations rather than species diversity per se
(Chapman et al., 1988; Wardle et al., 1997; Nilsson et al.,
1999). Belowground responses to changes in biodiversity are
highly variable (Loreau et al., 2001). For instance, soil
respiration can respond positively (Briones and Ineson, 1996;
0038-0717/$ - see front matter q 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.08.002
* Corresponding author. Present address: Department of Entomology,
University of Wisconsin, 237 Russell Labs, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison,
WI 53706, USA. Tel.: C1 608 262 4319.
E-mail address: [email protected] (M.D. Madritch).
McTiernan et al., 1997), randomly (Chapman et al., 1988), or
not at all (Bardgett and Shine, 1999) to increased litter
diversity. We know even less about the ecosystem level
consequences of intraspecific composition, despite the fact
that genetic variation is important to several population level
processes (Amos and Balmford, 2001). Whitham et al. (2003)
emphasize the potential importance of plant genotype to
ecosystem functioning, especially in light of widespread and
drastic reductions in ecosystem genetic diversity caused by
anthropogenic forces (Ledig, 1992; Vitousek et al., 1997).
The genotypic identity of leaf litter has been linked to
nutrient cycling previously by Driebe and Whitham (2000)
and Treseder and Vitousek (2001). In two cottonwood
species and their hybrids, genetically mediated variation in
condensed tannin concentrations differentially affected in-
stream litter decomposition rates (Driebe and Whitham,
2000). Likewise, genetically distinct populations of
Metrosideros polymorpha trees exhibited considerable
variation in genetically mediated litter chemistries import-
ant to decomposition and nitrogen cycling (Treseder and
Vitousek, 2001). Here, we focus solely on intraspecific
variation and the direct effects of this variation on
ecosystem processes during decomposition.
Soil Biology & Biochemistry 37 (2005) 319–327
www.elsevier.com/locate/soilbio
M.D. Madritch, M.D. Hunter / Soil Biology & Biochemistry 37 (2005) 319–327320
We have shown previously that the intraspecific
composition of turkey oak (Quercus laevis) litter can have
ecosystem consequences during the initial stages of litter
decomposition (Madritch and Hunter, 2002). Our initial
results covered an 18-month period and it was unknown
whether or not long-term effects on nutrient cycling would
persist. In addition, it was unclear whether effects of litter
phenotype were due solely to variation in litter chemistry, or
due to associated variation in the soil microbial and/or
microarthropod communities. Here, we present nutrient
cycling data from the extended 3-year litter decomposition
experiment in which we varied the intraspecific composition
of Q. laevis litter. In addition, we also include analyses of
bacterial and microarthropod communities in soil under-
lying litter treatments.
2. Methods
Our field site and experimental design are described in
detail in Madritch and Hunter (2002). Briefly, during leaf
fall of 1999, we hand collected litter from nine Q. laevis
individuals selected randomly from a pool of 1572 adult tree
previously genotyped by Berg and Hamrick (1994) using
Table 1
Initial litter and soil chemistry for the nine individual phenotypes and nine site lo
Initial litter Condensed
tannin (%)
Hydrolysable
tannin (%)
Total phenolics
(%)
L
1 17.84G1.07 16.15G0.35 68.33G7.36 1
2 21.08G3.19 13.27G1.31 57.47G6.15 1
3 18.81G0.58 12.04G0.44 48.89G6.58 1
4 15.96G0.38 7.94G1.57 60.76G3.45 1
5 15.62G1.15 13.40G3.71 67.46G4.10 1
6 10.80G0.98 12.18G0.22 61.29G5.40 2
7 18.66G0.16 10.21G0.17 64.17G2.79 1
8 22.28G0.01 13.05G2.75 63.31G3.91 1
9 25.82G0.41 11.30G2.31 63.61G4.23 1
d.f. 8
F 11.76
P 0.0006
Initial site soils Ammonium
availability
Nitrate
availability
C (%) N
1 12.63G3.98 2.98G0.94 2.107G0.149 0
2 4.43G0.97 1.55G0.51 1.916G0.091 0
3 8.58G2.23 3.66G0.88 1.988G0.092 0
4 8.08G3.12 2.4G0.57 1.957G0.152 0
5 10.89G3.00 2.34G0.42 1.486G0.088 0
6 5.55G1.23 2.8G0.46 1.876G0.153 0
7 3.29G0.67 2.53G0.60 1.413G0.050 0
8 8.30G2.17 1.83G0.36 1.602G0.145 0
9 7.48G1.50 1.32G0.45 1.700G0.139 0
d.f. 8
F 2.74
P 0.0099
ANOVAs performed on transformed data when necessary. Results are presented a
by bold summary statistics given below each chemistry column.
nine polymorphic allozyme loci. We established sets of 10
litter boxes, 9 with single phenotypes and 1 with an equal
mix of all 9, at each of nine sites (nZ90 boxes total). Litter
boxes were open-bottomed, meter square boxes covered
with vinyl coated hardware mesh to exclude non-treatment
litter. Ten litterbags containing 10 g of dry litter were
introduced into each box at the start of the experiment. We
added 150 g of loose treatment litter to each box (equivalent
to average litter fall per m2) at the beginning of the study
and at the beginning of the second and third years. Since we
were unable to locate replicate clones using microsatellite
markers (Klaper et al., 2001), we can only interpret results
as effects of phenotypic composition and not genetic
composition per se.
After an initial 3-month collection, litter bags were
collected each summer and winter (3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and
36 months) and analyzed for carbon, nitrogen, litter
chemistry, and microbial carbon content. Bags were also
removed for microarthropod extractions using Tullgren
funnels. Three 2!10 cm soil cores were taken from each
litter box. Each core was divided into 0–5 and 5–10 cm
depths, coinciding roughly with organic and mineral soil
layers. All three cores were then bulked, mixed and sieved of
root matter before analyses. Soil moisture was also monitored
cations
ignin (%) C:N ratio C (%) N (%)
8.06G2.04 87.27G0.61 49.97G0.61 0.573G0.004
5.06G0.51 83.08G0.30 51.43G0.30 0.619G0.027
6.20G1.30 83.87G2.14 48.80G2.14 0.582G0.014
5.92G0.54 74.96G1.62 48.69G1.62 0.650G0.014
9.04G0.33 86.73G0.95 49.30G0.95 0.568G0.006
1.73G1.09 87.17G1.18 50.02G1.18 0.574G0.009
7.53G1.55 83.64G1.27 46.88G1.27 0.561G0.035
5.89G2.30 93.54G0.37 48.52G0.37 0.519G0.005
7.93G1.46 96.14G1.69 49.98G1.69 0.520G0.009
8 8
23.38 6.20
!0.00001 0.0065
(%) C:N ratio pH Microbial car-
bon (ug/g soil)
.116G0.027 23.28G1.72 4.14G0.04 124.8G25.9
.082G0.003 23.34G0.94 4.22G0.03 149.6G42.3
.226G0.117 21.35G2.50 4.18G0.04 172.2G29.0
.088G0.005 22.09G1.39 4.26G0.03 157.1G34.6
.078G0.014 25.63G3.77 4.18G0.03 68.38G23.4
.080G0.007 22.89G1.63 4.18G0.04 183.5G39.4
.064G0.006 24.74G1.95 4.13G0.04 221.9G35.7
.062G0.006 25.36G2.61 4.2G0.03 133.0G31.9
.096G0.024 22.78G1.80 4.24G0.03 94.5G25.2
8
3.31
0.0027
s mean of the untransformed dataGSE. Significant differences are indicated
M.D. Madritch, M.D. Hunter / Soil Biology & Biochemistry 37 (2005) 319–327 321
every 3 months, and soil temperature measured hourly by
HOBO data loggers at each of the nine sites.
Bacterial communities beneath litter treatments were
estimated at the end of the second year using Biolog ECO
microplates which estimate bacterial community compo-
sition by measuring microbial catabolism of 32 different
carbon substrates. Different bacterial communities
have different patterns of substrate use as indicated by
a colorimetric reaction in 96-well microtiter plates. We
extracted soil bacterial communities and followed dilution
protocols of Zak et al. (1994) and recorded plate
absorbances every 12 for 72 h at 550 nm. At the end of
year 3, we extracted soil bacterial DNA using Qiagen
DNeasy kits and employed T-RFLP techniques (Liu et al.,
1997) to estimate bacterial diversity. PCR products were
digested with the restriction enzymes CfoI and HaeIII, and
final product lengths and quantities were determined by
electrophoresis with an ABI 310 automated DNA
sequencer.
Soil microarthropods were collected in modified
Tullgren funnels (Mallow and Crossley, 1984) and stored
in 70% ethanol. We sorted microarthropods into three
suborders of Acari (Oribatida, Asitgmata, and Prostigmata),
the order Collembola, and ‘others’. Fumigation extraction
(Ross and Sparling, 1993) was used to estimate microbial
biomass carbon as well as nitrogen (details given in
Madritch and Hunter (2002)). Soil respiration was mon-
itored monthly in each box with a portable infrared gas
analyzer (EGM-2 PP Systems).
Table 2
Repeated measures ANOVA of site and phenotype effects on litter and soil respo
Phenotype Date!phenot
Litter responses
Litter carbon change 0.2871; 24.6, !0.0001 0.0368; 1.39,
Litter nitrogen change 0.0404; 8.57, !0.0001
Litter microbial carbon
Percent litter remaining 0.0201; 5.58, !0.0001 0.0215; 1.58,
Soil responses
Respiration
Soil carbon 0–5 cm
Soil carbon 5–10 cm
Soil nitrogen 0–5 cm
Soil nitrogen 5–10 cm
Soil microbial carbon 0–5 cm
Soil microbial nitrogen
Ammonium availability 0.0653; 1.46,
Nitrate availability
Soil pH 0–5 cm
Soil pH 5–10 cm
Litter chemistry
Lignin 0.0085; 3.5, 0.0013 0.0322; 2.04,
Total phenolics 0.0859; 6.37, !0.0001
Condensed tannins 0.0757; 10.74, !0.0001 0.0848; 2.06,
Litter C:N 0.0326; 5.0, !0.0001
Hydrolysable tannins 0.0434; 6.13, !0.0001 0.0688; 1.71,
Litter carbon and nitrogen changes were calculated as (current concentrationKinit
responses for the entire 36-month time period, and F and P values are reported in it
8, date!site d.f.Z56.
Litter carbon, nitrogen, total phenolic, condensed tannin,
hydrolysable tannin, and lignin contents were estimated
using previously established techniques (Madritch and
Hunter, 2002). Methods to determine soil total carbon and
nitrogen, microbial carbon, microbial nitrogen, pH,
and nitrogen availability (estimated with resin bags) have
all been described in detail previously (Madritch and
Hunter, 2002).
2.1. Statistics
Assumptions of normality were tested for all data using a
Shapiro–Wilk W test and non-normal data were transformed
as necessary. We used simple one-way ANOVAs to
estimate phenotypic and site effects on initial litter and
soil chemistry. We used repeated measures ANOVA
procedures to estimate phenotypic effects over time using
the nine sites as replicates while local environmental effects
were estimated using the nine phenotypes as replicates. By
comparing the variance explained by phenotype and site, we
were able to estimate the relative contributions of litter
phenotype and local environment to variation in decompo-
sition and nutrient fluxes. We also separated data into two
time sets, 0–18 months (largely reported previously) and
18–36 months, and performed repeated measures ANOVA
and stepwise regressions (described below). To test for non-
additive effects of mixing litter phenotypes, we used
ANOVAs to compare the mean of the single phenotypes
(expected response) with the mixed litter treatment
nses sampled seven times over 36 months
ype Site Date!site
0.0408
0.2768; 8.40, !0.0001
0.0093 0.0088; 2.75, 0.011 0.0179; 1.48, 0.0278
0.065; 1.81, !0.0001
0.0827; 2.35, 0.0282 0.0826; 1.59, 0.0101
0.097; 5.01, 0.0001 0.1387; 1.78, 0.0043
0.0597; 3.03, 0.0063 0.1009; 2.03, 0.0003
0.0313; 2.36, 0.0283 0.1402; 2.14, 0.0236
0.1038; 1.54, 0.045
0.0708; 3.74, 0.0012 0.143; 2.86, 0.0006
0.0074 0.0410; 6.3, !0.0001 0.0798; 1.98, !0.0001
0.0409; 2.98, 0.0025
0.0439; 3.01, !0.0001
0.0064; 2.16, 0.0428 0.0257; 2.59, !0.0001
0.0003 0.0511; 3.64, !0.0001
0.0363; 2.16, 0.0064
!0.0001 0.0414; 6.61, !0.0001 0.1375; 3.76, !0.0001
0.0016 0.0164; 2.61, 0.0156 0.0972; 2.72, !0.0001
ial concentration)/(initial concentration). R2 values are given for significant
alics, respectively. Phenotype d.f.Z9, date!phenotype d.f.Z63, site d.f.Z
Fig. 1. Litter carbon and nitrogen content. Changes in litter nitrogen and carbon were calculated as (current concentrationKinitial concentration)/(initial
concentration). The graph shows the response of each single phenotype litter and the mixed litter treatment. Positive values indicate a net gain of carbon or
nitrogen; negative values indicate a net loss. Results are grouped into short-term (0–18 month) and long-term (18–36 month) effects. While there were significant
differences among litter phenotypes (P!0.0001), they did not deviate in any predictable manner from the mixed litter treatment. Bars are G1SE, nZ9.
Fig. 2. Litter decomposition rates. Litter decomposition from 0 to 18 months differed among litter phenotype treatments (PZ0.0351), but did not deviate from
the mixed litter treatment in any predictable way. Decomposition from 18 to 36 months was unaffected by litter phenotype, but did differ among sites
(PZ0.0445). Rates (k) were calculated as yZeKkt, where y is the proportion remaining and t time in days. Bars are G1SE, nZ9.
M.D. Madritch, M.D. Hunter / Soil Biology & Biochemistry 37 (2005) 319–327322
Fig. 3. Soil ammonium availability. Ammonium availability in the soil under phenotype litters as measured with ion exchange resin bags. The graph shows the
response of each single phenotype litter and the mixed litter treatment. Ammonium in the soil varied under single phenotype treatments over time (PZ0.0074),
but did not deviate in any predictable manner from the mixed litter treatment. Results are grouped into short-term (18 month) and long-term (36 month) effects.
Bars are G1SE, nZ9.
M.D. Madritch, M.D. Hunter / Soil Biology & Biochemistry 37 (2005) 319–327 323
(observed response), similar to analysis suggested
for decomposition experiments by Loreau (1998)
and demonstrated by Wardle et al. (1997). We have
insufficient degrees of freedom to investigate site by
phenotype effects.
When estimating the effects of litter chemistry on carbon
and nitrogen fluxes, we accounted for changes in litter
chemistry over time by employing methods similar to
the analyses of population time series (Royama, 1992;
Table 3
Litter chemistry effects on nutrient dynamics during 18–36 months
Litter chemistry at time t
Lignin content Total phenolics Condensed ta
Litter response at time tC1
D Litter carbon K0.0127*
D Litter nitrogen 0.0141*
D Litter
microbial carbon
D Percent litter
remaining
0.0205*
Soil response at time tC1
D Respiration 0.0652*** 0.014*
D Soil carbon K0.0276* 0.019*
D Soil nitrogen
D Soil microbial
carbon
D Nitrate avail-
ability
K0.0813***
D Ammonium
availability
K0.1162*** K0.0147*
D Soil pH K0.2950***
Litter chemistry at time t was correlated with the change in litter nutrient and soil n
using back-stepped multiple regressions. Most aspects of litter and soil nutrient
partial R2 values are given for litter chemistry indices used in the final regression
*P!0.05, **P!0.01, ***P!0.001.
Berryman, 1999). We calculated the change in the nutrient
under consideration (X) as ln(XtC1/Xt), repeated this for
each of the time steps (0, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36
months), combined data across all sites, and performed a
stepwise multiple regression between the nutrient flux of
interest and our estimates of litter chemistry (Berryman,
1999; Madritch and Hunter, 2002).
Biolog ECO-plate absorbance data were analyzed
using principal components analysis (PCA, PCord v. 4).
nnin Litter C:N Hydrolysable tan-
nin
Final model R2***
K0.1782*** 0.1908***
0.1820*** 0.1961***
n.s.
0.0549*** K0.0710*** 0.1463***
0.0153* 0.1771*** 0.2716***
0.0659* 0.1125**
n.s.
0.0447** 0.0447**
K0.0421** 0.1234***
0.1308***
K0.0263*** 0.3213***
utrients from time step t to time step tC1 [calculated as ln(conctC1/conct)]
change were significantly affected by some aspect of litter chemistry. The
model. The sign of partial R2 values indicates the direction of relationship.
M.D. Madritch, M.D. Hunter / Soil Biology & Biochemistry 37 (2005) 319–327324
Axes with broken-stick eigenvalues less than the actual
eigenvalues were kept for further analysis (Jackson, 1993).
We tested for significant differences among site and litter
phenotype groups using Multi-Response Permutation
Procedure (MRPP, PCord v. 4). Microarthropod data were
non-normal and therefore analyzed using non-metric multi-
dimensional scaling (NMS, PCord v. 4). NMS provides a
more robust analysis of non-normal, heavily skewed data,
whereas PCA is suitable for data sets that approach
normality (McCune and Grace, 2002). MRPP (PCord v. 4)
was also used to test for site and phenotype effects on
microarthropod communities. T-RFLP results were ana-
lyzed using Genescan 3.1.2. software. Electropherograms of
T-RFLP data indicate bacterial diversity by the number
and size of fragment groups after restriction enzyme
digestion, while population sizes of each group are indicated
by relative peak height. We tested for litter phenotype
effects on soil bacterial diversity by overlaying electro-
pherograms from different litter phenotype treatments
and searching for differences in peak location and peak
height.
Fig. 4. Representative T-RFLP electropherograms. Results of bacterial DNA amp
and 9, and from under the mixed phenotype treatment. Peak position along the
whereas peak height indicates relative abundance as determined by fragment co
indicating no difference in bacterial diversity and only slight differences in relati
3. Results
The initial litter from each of the nine phenotypes
significantly differed in their condensed tannin and nitrogen
content, as well as their C:N ratio while the initial soil
chemistry underlying each of the nine sites differed only in
carbon contents (Table 1).
Changes in the concentration of litter nitrogen and
carbon over time were dominated by phenotype effects
(P!0.0001) and unrelated to the site of decomposition
(Table 2, Fig. 1). Litter mass loss over the entire 3-year
period was affected by both litter phenotype treatment and
site location (Table 2). After 18 months of decomposition,
k values varied among litter phenotype treatments (d.f.Z9,
FZ2.16, PZ0.0351), but not among sites (PO0.05)
(Fig. 2). From 18 to 36 months, however, the decomposition
rate was influenced only by site (d.f.Z8, FZ2.12,
PZ0.0445) and not by litter phenotype (PO0.05) (Fig. 2).
Soil ammonium availability varied among phenotype
treatments over time (Table 2). Ammonium was consist-
ently more available during the initial stages of leaf litter
lification and HaeIII digest of DNA from soil under phenotype treatment 1
x-axis indicates bacteria group identity as determined by fragment length,
unts. In all electropherograms, there were no differences in peak position
ve abundances.
M.D. Madritch, M.D. Hunter / Soil Biology & Biochemistry 37 (2005) 319–327 325
decomposition from 0 to 18 months (Fig. 3). Other soil
responses including respiration, percent carbon and nitro-
gen, microbial biomass, microbial nitrogen, nitrate avail-
ability, and pH were all dominated by site effects (Table 2).
Neither soil temperature nor soil moisture was varied by
litter treatment or site (PO0.05, data not shown).
Nutrient fluxes in the litter and soil of single phenotype
treatments sometimes differed from the mixed litter
treatment (Figs. 1–3). However, there were no significant
differences between the mean of single phenotype responses
and the mixed litter response for metrics reported in Table 2
(PO0.05 in all cases). Thus, we found no long-term non-
additive effects of phenotype diversity on litter or soil
nutrient dynamics.
All litter nutrient fluxes and most of the nutrient fluxes in
the soil (with the exception of soil nitrogen change) during
18–36 months were influenced by litter chemistries
as indicated by stepwise regression results (Table 3).
The 0–18 month results have been reported previously
(Madritch and Hunter, 2002). In general, hydrolysable
tannin concentrations and C:N ratios exhibited the strongest
influence over litter carbon and nitrogen changes, while
litter lignin content was strongly correlated with long-term
soil pH change (Table 3).
Soil bacterial and microarthropod communities were
unaffected by litter phenotype treatment, but significantly
influenced by site. PCA analysis of Biolog ECO-plate
absorbance data yielded two axes which described signifi-
cant differences among sites but no effects of litter
phenotype treatments (MRPP PZ0.0481 and PO0.05,
respectively). Likewise, T-RFLP electropherograms of soil
bacterial profiles did not differ significantly among litter
phenotype treatments. Fig. 4 compares the electrophero-
grams of three T-RFLP analyses for soils beneath litter
phenotypes one, nine, and the mixed litter treatment. The
lack of significant differences in relative peak size and
location indicates very similar soil bacterial communities.
Although we only show three electropherograms, they are
representative of all our T-RFLP runs and indicate that
bacterial communities were similar across all litter treat-
ments. Similar to PCA analysis of bacterial communities,
NMS analysis of microarthropod data averaged over time
showed significant differences among sites, but no effect
of litter phenotype treatments (MRPP PZ0.0001 and
P!0.05).
4. Discussion
Previous work showed that litter phenotype treatments
can influence nutrient dynamics under relatively short time
periods (Madritch and Hunter, 2002). Our current data show
(1) that the intraspecific composition of leaf litter can
influence short- and long-term carbon and nitrogen fluxes
during decomposition, and (2) that differences in nutrient
fluxes are not associated with variation in soil microar-
thropod or bacterial communities.
The transfer of carbon and nitrogen to and from litter, litter
decomposition rate, and the availability of ammonium in the
soil beneath litter treatments were all significantly affected by
litter phenotype treatment (Figs. 1–3). Variation in litter
chemistry among phenotype treatments seemed to play
a major role in ecosystem responses, as stepwise regression
results showed that litter chemistry was important to virtually
all measured aspects of nutrient cycling (Table 3). Tannin and
lignin contents are particularly important and have been
shown by others to correlate with intraspecific variation in
litter decomposition (Driebe and Whitham, 2000; Sariyildiz
and Anderson, 2003).
Although only some of the litter chemistries varied by
phenotype in the litter initially, repeated measures ANOVA
showed significant phenotype effects on all litter chemistries
over the entire 3-year period. Previous work estimated that
34–40% of the variation in chemical phenotype is due to
genetic variation among individual trees (Madritch and
Hunter, 2002; Klaper and Hunter, 1998). Thus, phenotypic
litter composition is most likely affecting nutrient dynamics,
in part, due to genetically mediated variation in litter
chemistries. It is important to recognize that the approxi-
mate 60–65% of the variation in chemical phenotype not
genetically mediated is also important to nutrient dynamics.
Several researchers have found evidence that microbial
communities can adapt to the quality of leaf litter input
(McClaugherty et al., 1985; Hunt et al., 1988; Clein and
Schimel, 1995). However, we found no effects of litter
phenotype on bacterial community diversity (as measured
by Biolog and T-RFLP assays). Instead, only strong site
effects were detected by the Biolog assay. Both of the
microbial analyses we used were limited to bacterial
diversity, and it is known that fungal communities play
major roles during litter decomposition in forest ecosys-
tems. For instance, Neely et al. (1991) found that the
fungal:bacterial biomass ratio in Quercus prinus litter
increased to 4.3 after 100 days. Unfortunately our attempts
to use T-RFLP assays with fungal DNA were unsuccessful.
Though microarthropod communities are also known to
shift with changes in leaf litter species diversity (Hansen,
2000), in our study, microarthropod community structure
was influenced only by site and not by litter phenotype. In
general, the soil fauna that we surveyed was not affected by
litter phenotype, nor was variation in the community
composition of either bacterial or microarthropod commu-
nities responsible for differences in nutrient cycling.
Given that nutrient cycling differed among litter
phenotype treatments whereas the biotic communities did
not, it is likely that the biotic community was sufficiently
flexible to process variable litter inputs. While essential for
decomposition and nutrient cycling during leaf litter
decomposition, soil microbial communities may be fairly
redundant and even simple communities appear to be able to
process most litter (Andren et al., 1995; Wardle et al., 1997).
M.D. Madritch, M.D. Hunter / Soil Biology & Biochemistry 37 (2005) 319–327326
However, our community analyses were fairly coarse,
well above the species resolution level, and it is possible
that our inability to detect community changes at a finer
taxonomic resolution precluded detection of litter diversity
effects on soil biota. It is also important to note that our
failure to characterize fungal communities severely restricts
our ability to determine the full microbial response to
differences in intraspecific litter composition.
A primary goal of this study was to compare short- and
long-term effects of litter phenotype on nutrient cycling
during decomposition. The importance of previous short-
term effects could be diminished if no long-term effects
persisted. In general, the influence of litter phenotype on
decomposition was similar after 18 and 36 months. In both
cases, individual litter treatments varied idiosyncratically
from each other and from the mixed litter treatment. Over
both time scales, genetically mediated litter chemistries
were correlated with nutrient cycling in the leaf litter and
underlying soil. While litter chemistries in general were
useful predictors of nutrient fluxes, phenotypic composition
alone was not. Despite these short- and long-term
similarities, several differences are worth noting.
We previously found short-term, non-additive effects of
litter phenotype on soil carbon and nitrogen content,
microbial biomass, and pH (Madritch and Hunter, 2002).
However, none of these non-additive effects persisted over
the long-term. Instead, long-term nutrient fluxes were only
influenced by phenotypic identity. In addition, the influence
of site and date!site effects on nutrient fluxes increased in
the long-term (Table 2). The importance of site effects
increased over the long-term, and in some cases became
more important to nutrient fluxes than were the litter
phenotype treatments.
Several individual phenotype litter treatments elicited
different ecosystem responses compared to the mixed litter
treatment. These differences were sometimes large, but
always unpredictable. While litter chemistries were corre-
lated with nutrient dynamics, there was no overall pattern of
single phenotype treatment nutrient dynamics compared to
the mixed litter treatment. Idiosyncratic responses are
common in biodiversity and ecosystem function studies
pertaining to litter decomposition, and may be due to
overwhelming effects of species identity on litter decompo-
sition (Wardle et al., 2003).
While we can be certain that the trees from which we
collected litter were of different genotypes (Berg and
Hamrick, 1994; Klaper et al., 2001), we were unable to
find replicate clones of these genotypes within the stand.
Consequently, interpretation of our results is limited to a
discussion of phenotypic effects. Nonetheless, previous
work on the same stand of Q. laevis used here (Klaper and
Hunter, 1998; Klaper et al., 2001; Madritch and Hunter,
2002) and work on other species (Driebe and Whitham,
2000; Treseder and Vitousek, 2001) has shown a genetic
component to phenotypic variation in litter chemistries
important to decomposition. However, if different tree
genotypes establish preferentially under specific soil
nutrient conditions, soil chemistry could be the sole cause
of variation in litter chemistries. We have previously
addressed this issue (Madritch and Hunter, 2002) and
concluded that a lack of soil nutrient patterns (Klaper et al.,
2001), the small-scale random dispersal of adults (Berg and
Hamrick, 1994), and the random selection of individuals for
inclusion into our experiment effectively eliminate the
possibility that all litter chemistry differences were caused
only by growing environment. The differences in litter
chemistries important to nutrient cycling were influenced by
both genotype and environment. Therefore, our results are
relevant to the current anthropogenic decline of genetic
diversity within forest ecosystems (Ledig, 1992); a decline
in genetic diversity, or a change in genetic composition, can
influence carbon and nitrogen cycling during
decomposition.
Intraspecific litter composition can influence carbon and
nitrogen fluxes, and the effects shown here are the result of
litter identity. In addition, differences in ecosystem
functioning were attributable only to variation in litter
chemistry and not any detected changes in bacterial or
microarthropod communities. However, we re-emphasize
that fungal communities need to be considered in future
work. Leaf chemistries have long been recognized as
important to plant–herbivore interactions, but increasing
evidence suggests they play an equally important role in
nutrient cycling (Hattenschwiler and Vitousek, 2000).
Our work suggests that genetically mediated variation in
secondary metabolites can have important ecosystem
consequences; in the turkey oak sandhills system, sufficient
variation exists within a single species such that changes in
intraspecific composition elicits ecosystem responses.
Intraspecific variation may be more important when the
variation in chemical phenotype is larger (such as the
145-fold difference in condensed tannin concentrations in
Leucaena trichandra, Dalzell and Shelton, 2002). Con-
versely, speciose communities may be influenced more by
interspecific variation. However, without knowing exactly
when and where intraspecific composition is important to
ecosystem functioning, it would seem prudent to include the
maintenance of intraspecific diversity within conservation
plans.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the National Science
Foundation and the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.
We especially thank J. Sullivan for help with T-RFLP
analyses. We also thank the Savannah River Ecology
Laboratory for the use of their facilities and M. Cabrera,
D. Coleman, J. Hamrick, P. Hendrix, R. Pulliam, R. Sharitz,
L. England, R. Klaper, S. Connelly, S. Eustis, B. Nuse,
J. Rogers, and S. Scott for comments and/or laboratory
assistance.
M.D. Madritch, M.D. Hunter / Soil Biology & Biochemistry 37 (2005) 319–327 327
References
Amos, W., Balmford, A., 2001. When does conservation genetics matter?.
Heredity 87, 257–265.
Andren, O., Clarholm, M., Bengtsson, J., 1995. Biodiversity and species
redundancy among litter decomposers, in: Collins, H.P.,
Robertson, G.P., Klug, M.J. (Eds.), The Significance and Regulation
of Soil Biodiversity. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 141–151.
Bardgett, R.D., Shine, A., 1999. Linkages between plant litter diversity, soil
microbial biomass and ecosystem function in temperate grasslands. Soil
Biology and Biochemistry 31, 317–321.
Berg, E., Hamrick, J.L., 1994. Spatial and genetic structure of two sandhills
oaks: Quercus laevis and Quercus margaretta (Fagaceae). American
Journal of Botany 81, 7–14.
Berryman, A., 1999. Principles of Population Dynamics and Their
Application. Stanley Thornes, Cheltenham.
Briones, M.J.I., Ineson, P., 1996. Decomposition of Eucalyptus leaves in
litter mixtures. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 28, 1381–1388.
Cameron, T., 2002. 2002: the year of the ‘diversity-ecosystem function’
debate. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17, 495–496.
Chapman, K., Whittaker, J.B., Heal, O.W., 1988. Metabolic and faunal
activity in litters of tree mixtures compared with pure stands.
Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 24, 33–40.
Clein, J.S., Schimel, J.P., 1995. Nitrogen turnover and availability during
succession from alder to poplar in Alaskan taiga forests. Soil Biology
and Biochemistry 27, 743–752.
Coleman, D.C., Crossley, D.A., 1996. Fundamentals of Soil Ecology.
Academic Press, San Diego.
Dalzell, S.A., Shelton, H.M., 2002. Genotypic variation in proanthocya-
nidin status in the Leucaena genus. Journal of Agricultural Science 138,
209–220.
Driebe, E.M., Whitham, T.G., 2000. Cottonwood hybridization affects
tannin and nitrogen content of leaf litter and alters decomposition.
Oecologia 123, 99–107.
Hansen, R.A., 2000. Effects of habitat complexity and composition on a
diverse litter microarthropod assemblage. Ecology 81, 1120–1132.
Hattenschwiler, S., Vitousek, P., 2000. The role of polyphenols in
terrestrial ecosystem nutrient cycling. Trends in Ecology and
Evolution 15, 238–243.
Hunt, H.W., Ingham, E.R., Coleman, D.C., Elliott, E.T., Reid, C.P.P., 1988.
Nitrogen limitation of production and decomposition in prairie,
mountain meadow, and pine forest. Ecology 69, 1009–1016.
Jackson, D.A., 1993. Stopping rules in principal components analysis: a
comparison of heuristical and statistical approaches. Ecology 74, 2204–
2214.
Klaper, R.K., Hunter, M.D., 1998. Genetic versus environmental effects on
the phenolic chemistry of Turkey Oak Quercus Laevis, in: Steiner, K.C.
(Ed.), Diversity and Adaptation in Oak Species. The Pennsylvania State
University Press, pp. 262–268.
Klaper, R.K., Ritland, K., Mousseau, T.A., Hunter, M.D., 2001. Heritability
of phenolics in Quercus laevis inferred using molecular markers.
Journal of Heredity 92, 421–426.
Ledig, F.T., 1992. Human impacts on genetic diversity in forest
ecosystems. Oikos 63, 87–108.
Liu, W.T., Marsh, T.L., Cheng, H., Forney, L.J., 1997. Characterization of
microbial diversity by determining terminal restriction fragment length
polymorphisms of genes encoding 16S rRNA. Applied and Environ-
mental Microbiology 63, 4516–4522.
Loreau, M., 1998. Separating sampling and other effects in biodiversity
experiments. Oikos 82, 600–602.
Loreau, M., Naeem, S., Inchausti, P., Bengtsson, J., Grime, J.P.,
Hector, A., Hooper, D.U., Huston, M.A., Raffaelli, D., Schmid, B.,
Tilman, D., Wardle, D.A., 2001. Biodiversity and ecosystem
functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science 294,
804–808.
Madritch, M.D., Hunter, M.D., 2002. Phenotypic diversity influences
ecosystem functioning in an oak sandhills community. Ecology 83,
2084–2090.
Mallow, D., Crossley Jr.., D.A., 1984. Evaluation of five techniques for
recovering postlarval stages of chiggers (Acarine:Trombiculidae) from
soil habitats. Journal of Economic Entomology 77, 281–284.
McCann, K., 2000. The diversity–stability debate. Nature 405, 228–233.
McClaugherty, C.A., Pastor, J., Aber, J.D., Melillo, J.M., 1985. Forest litter
decomposition in relation to soil nitrogen dynamics and litter quality.
Ecology 66, 266–275.
McCune, B., Grace, J.B., 2002. Analysis of Ecological Communities. MjM
Software Design, OR, USA.
McTiernan, K.B., Ineson, P., Coward, P.A., 1997. Respiration and nutrient
release from tree leaf litter mixtures. Oikos 78, 527–538.
Naeem, S., 2002. Ecosystem consequences of biodiversity loss: the
evolution of a paradigm. Ecology 83, 1537–1552.
Neely, C., Beare, M., Hargrove, W., Coleman, D.C., 1991. Relationships
between fungal and bacterial substrate-induced respiration, biomass
and plant residue decomposition. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 23,
947–954.
Nilsson, M.C., Wardle, D.A., Dahlberg, A., 1999. Effects of plant litter
species composition and diversity on the boreal forest plant–soil
system. Oikos 86, 16–26.
Ross, D.J., Sparling, J.P., 1993. Comparison of methods to estimate
microbial C and N in litter and soil under Pinus radiata on a coastal
sand. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 25, 1591–1599.
Royama, T., 1992. Analytical Population Dynamics. Chapman & Hall,
New York.
Sariyildiz, T., Anderson, J.M., 2003. Interactions between litter quality,
decomposition and soil fertility: a laboratory study. Soil Biology and
Biochemistry 35, 391–399.
Schimel, J., Van Cleve, K., Cates, R., Clausen, T., Reichardt, P., 1996.
Effects of balsam poplar (Populus balsamifera) tannins and low
molecular weight phenolics on microbial activity in taiga floodplain
soil: implications for changes in N cycling during succession. Canadian
Journal of Botany 74, 84–90.
Treseder, K., Vitousek, P., 2001. Potential ecosystem-level effects of
genetic variation among populations of Metrosideros polymorpha from
a soil fertility gradient in Hawaii. Oecologia 126, 266–275.
Vitousek, P.M., Mooney, H.A., Lubchenco, J., Melillo, J.M., 1997. Human
domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science 277, 494–499.
Wardle, D.A., Bonner, K.I., Nicholson, K.S., 1997. Biodiversity and plant
litter: experimental evidence which does not support the view that
enhanced species richness improves ecosystem function. Oikos 79,
247–258.
Wardle, D.A., Nilsson, M.C., Zackrisson, O., Gallet, C., 2003. Determi-
nants of litter mixing effects in a Swedish boreal forest. Soil Biology
and Biochemistry 35, 827–835.
Whitham, T.G., Young, W.P., Martinsen, G.D., Gehring, C.A.,
Schweitzer, J.A., Shuster, S.M., Wimp, G.M., Fischer, D.G.,
Bailey, J.K., Lindroth, R.L., Woolbright, S., Kuske, C.R., 2003.
Community and ecosystem genetics: a consequence of the extended
phenotype. Ecology 84, 559–573.
Zak, J.C., Willig, M.R., Moorhead, D., Wildman, H.G., 1994. Functional
diversity of microbial communities: a quantitative approach. Soil
Biology and Biochemistry 26, 1101–1108.