Upload
tranhuong
View
218
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 20061 1
Phasor Measurements:
Impact on EMS Control Centers:State Estimation& Other Applications
Jay GiriRene Avila-Rosales
AREVA T&D Inc
June 5-6/2006
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 20062 2
The Control Center Landscape is Changing
u Trends indicate a groundswell growth of PMUs in utilities worldwide
u In the next 5 years, this growth evolution could become a revolutionary new paradigm to operate in:
w500+ PMUs in Eastern US and Western US
wEach PMU provides dozens of data values, upto 60 times/sec
wSimilar dramatic growth trends in Brazil, Europe, etc.
u The big question is:
wHow will this benefit power system operations?
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 20063 3
Power System Operations…
u Power grid has gradually evolved in an incremental manner over many decades
u Load and system conditions change continuously…
wQuasi-steady state conditions for majority of the time
wOccasionally goes into dynamically changing conditions
u Control center operators objective is: Use the EMS tools to make sure the “lights stay on all the time!”
u Prevent Blackouts!
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 20064 4
EMS Applications
Operating System Operating System
Database & Development EnvironmentDatabase & Development Environment
SCADASCADA
Generation Generation ApplicationsApplications O
perator Console
Operator C
onsole
TransmissionTransmissionApplicationsApplications
Dat
a A
cqui
sitio
nD
ata
Acq
uisi
tion TrainingTraining
SimulatorSimulator
RealReal--Time ApplicationsTime Applications
Study mode / Modeling/ Archiving
DistributionDistributionApplicationsApplications
Power System(HV and MV substations)
Power System(HV and MV substations)
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 20065 5
EyesEyes
Control Center Functions
SCADA
2 sec
AnalyticalBrain
AnalyticalBrain
Reactive Brain
Reactive Brain
Proactive Brain
AGC4 sec
SE & CA60 sec
DSSDTS
30 minFiscalBrain
MarketSystemTools
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 20066 6
Asynchronous, Uncorrelated,
Telemetry view
Asynchronous, Uncorrelated,
Telemetry view
EMS Views of the Grid
SCADA
System-wide, correlatedExisting system-wide
view
System-wide, correlatedExisting system-wide
view
Generation, TiesEnergy Balance
(Freq) view
Generation, TiesEnergy Balance
(Freq) view
What is coming up nextFuture system-wide view
AGC
SE & CA
DSSDTS
PMU Data
PMU Data
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 20067 7
EMS Benefits of “Phasor1” Data
u Phasor data
w Refresh rate 30 samples/sec
w Time tagged data
w Compatible with modern communication technology
w Responds to system dynamic behavior
w Angle-pair change means: MW change; ‘electrical distance change’
u EMS SCADA data
w Refresh rate 2-5 seconds
w Latency and skew
w Relies on legacy ‘older’ communication technology
w Responds to system static behavior
w Freq change means: Generation/Load imbalance
1“Phasor” is in quotes to suggest that we are not talking strictly about phasors, but about high speed, accurately time-tagged ‘synchronous’data in general.
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 20068 8
Typical phasor measurements from A Single PMU
u 20 Hz:w Phase A, B, C current magnitude and phase angle
w Phase A, B, C voltage magnitude and phase angle
w Frequency + others
u1 Hzw Phase A, B, C Active Power
w Phase A, B, C Reactive Power
w Phase A, B, C Apparent Power
w Phase A, B, C power factor
w Total active power
w Total reactive power
w Total apparent power
w Total power factor
w Positive, Zero and Negative sequence current magnitude and phase
w Positive, Zero and Negative sequence voltage magnitude and phase + others
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 20069 9
Industry Challenges
u Impacts of Deregulation
w Independent generation
w Transmission grid pushed closer to limits
u Congested Corridors
w Locations are less predictable
w Lack of transmission capacity
w National Interest corridors
u Dynamic Instabilities
w Cascading events
w Lack of reactive support
w Acts of nature
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 200610 10
Evolution of Network Model Sizes
8,000 buses(reduced ECAR)
1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
1,200 buses (Original EMP Test
Model)
6,000 buses(WECC
161 KV & above)
4,200 buses
8,000 buses
5,000 busesTransmission
23,000 buses Mar 05(Eastern Interconnect
Breaker Model73,000 buses )
32,000 buses
2,500 buses Dec 04(42,000 buses used for FAT/SAT)
11,000 buses (PSSE Bus/Branch replaced by detailed
breaker for MISO Area )1,400 buses
3,000 buses
2,000 buses
1.5M feedersDistribution
3,000 buses
5,000 buses
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 200611 11
PMUs & EMS Applications 1
uModel data validation
u Immediate alerts of sudden system changes
u Contingency Analysis alerts:
wSudden angle-pair changes for critical corridors
u Forensic studies to recreate disturbance
u State Estimation (later)…
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 200612 12
PMUs & EMS Applications 2
u Improved Visualization:Stability margins, geographic views of congested paths, unusual angle differences
u Prevent Cascading Events:Quickly identify imminent cascading events
u Dynamic Instability Prediction:Fast and accurate instability prediction
wWarning signals
wEarly detection
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 200613 13
PMUs & EMS Applications 3
u New advanced EMS applications:Innovate new EMS applications to fully exploit PMU data, Decision support tools
uWide Area Monitoring and Control:
wDevelop an adaptive protective scheme to protect “the power system grid as an entity”.
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 200615 15
PMU AllocationObjectives
u Deploy the PMUs based on the following questions:
wWhat is the problem to solve?
wWhat are the measurements that we need?
wHow often we need these measurements?
u Placement strategies based on problems being solved:
wQuasi steady-state conditions:Increase observability and controllability
wDynamice conditions:Capture critical local dynamics without complete observability. Locate to identify make inter-area modes observable
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 200616 16
PMU integration issues for EMS
u Need for upgraded communication systems
u Communication delays and latency
u Calibration and accuracy of PMUS
u Calibration among different PMU vendors
u Accuracy under off nominal frequency conditions
u Efficient and reliable storage, archiving and retrieval
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 200617 17
Dynamic Analysis functions
u PMU Measurements – in milli-seconds
u Improve visualization of voltage dynamic events (slow decline)
u Dynamic triggering based on PMU warning signals
wFrequency decline or rate of frequency
wSlow voltage decline or specific load level
wConsiderable phase angle separation on remote locations
w Inter-area oscillations
wCascading
u Use PMUs to provide early warning alerts!
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 200618 18
Dynamic functions-PMU/PDC
VoltageInstabilityVoltage
Instability
Small signalInstability
Small signalInstability
TransientInstability
TransientInstability
PMULocal
SCADA
PMULocal
SCADA
Triggers
Frequency decline
Rate of frequency
Slow voltage decline
Specific Load level
Margin decline
Considerable angle separation
Inter-area oscillations
Cascading
Triggers
Frequency decline
Rate of frequency
Slow voltage decline
Specific Load level
Margin decline
Considerable angle separation
Inter-area oscillations
Cascading
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 200619 19
Voltage instability prediction function
u Tens of seconds and minutes time frame
wProvide to the operator sufficient information about the stability margin i.e. P-V, Q-V plots for a specific corridor
wAlarm the PMU measurement values outside limits
Voltage instability prediction
~10 seconds
Voltage instability prediction
~10 seconds
Slow Voltage decline or Load level?
Slow Voltage decline or Load level?
Capacitor SwitchingReactor SwitchingSVCUVL sheddingRemedial actionsHigh speed trips
Capacitor SwitchingReactor SwitchingSVCUVL sheddingRemedial actionsHigh speed trips
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 200620 20
Small signal instability prediction function
uMinutes time frame
wDetect power swings in the network
wProvide direct observation of inter-area oscillations modes
wThis is faster than the computation of eigenvalues using a detail model of a specific configuration
Inter-area and Local OscillationsInter-area and Local
Oscillations
Small signalinstability prediction~minutes
Small signalinstability prediction~minutes
PSS (Stabilizers)PSS (Stabilizers)
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 200621 21
Angle instability prediction function
u Less than one second time frame
wStability margins presented to the operator
wFocus on reducing the stability swings via: generator tripping and capacitor/reactor switching control actions
Frequency decline?Frequency decline?
Angleinstability prediction
~milliseconds
Angleinstability prediction
~milliseconds
Controlled islandingGenerator trippingDynamic brakingUFL sheddingFast Load sheddingFACTS, HVDC etc.Remedial actionsHigh speed trips
Controlled islandingGenerator trippingDynamic brakingUFL sheddingFast Load sheddingFACTS, HVDC etc.Remedial actionsHigh speed trips
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 200623 23
Frequency stability function
u Seconds and minutes time frame
wDetect generation/load imbalances
wEstimate impact of the imbalance on the load’s response and generators’ inertias
w If the estimated frequency is not acceptable, provide recommendations to operator to bring frequency back
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 200624 24
PMUs & Wide-Area Implementations
u Wide-area Monitoring
w PMU technology at selected locations
w Vulnerability detection:
l angle difference, frequency and voltage rate of change
u Wide-area Protection
w Treat the grid like a device to be protected
w Selectivity, Robustness and Dependability
w Fast communication
u Wide-area Control
w Preventive/Corrective
w Adaptive Islanding
l Identify coherent groups of generators online
w Emergency
w Restorative
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 200625 25
Wide Area Control
uGrid Protection, In the Future:
Develop protective control schemes that dynamically adapt to current power system conditions, to preserve the integrity of the power system grid as an entity.
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 200626 26
Wide Area Control Framework
Reaction to catastrophes and Feedback Control
Voltage stability
~10 seconds
Small SignalStability
~minutes
Transient Stability
~milliseconds
Adaptive Restoration
~minutes
Wide-area State Estimation
~secondsControlled islandingGenerator trippingDynamic brakingUFL sheddingFast Load sheddingFACTS, HVDC etc.Remedial actionsHigh speed trips
PSS (Stabilizers)
Capacitor SwitchingReactor SwitchingSVCUVL sheddingRemedial actionsHigh speed trips
Unit restartResynchronizationLoad restorationOther control actions
Inter-area and Local Oscillations
Slow Voltage decline or Load level?
Frequency decline?
Margin decline or cascading?
Substation
SE
~milliseconds
Substation
SE
Substation
SE
PMUs
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 200627 27
SE uses SCADA data to determine (every 1-5 minutes) a ‘best estimate’ of the current power system state:
Voltages, Angles, MW/MVAR flows, CB status, taps, etc
What is State Estimation (SE)?
One of the key solution variables in SE is the: bus voltage phase angle.
PMUs can now provide the direct measurement of voltage phase angle as well as current phasors.
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 200628 28
StateEstimation
PMU PMUPMU
PDC
ContingencyAnalysis
SecurityEnhancement
DynamicSecurityAnalysis
Marketrevenue
sensitivities
OptimalPower Flow
SCADA
NetworkModel
ICCP &Other
SimultaneousFeasibility
Test
SE’s Role in Power System Operations
State Estimation has become a critical, ‘must-run successfully’ control center function.
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 200629 29
Comparison of SE output with PMU Measurementswithin a few degrees!
courtesy BPA
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 200630 30
uSE time frame is in seconds
uPMU data is ~30 or more samples per second
uPMU data needs to be merged with SCADA data
uStatistics for performance, accuracy and robustness
uEnable/Disable capabilities of PMU devices
uUtilize PMU data in neigboring external areas
SE use of PMUs
Issues
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 200631 31
Existing SE Software
u PMU data is automatically used (whenever available) as input data for the SE solution algorithm:
wVoltage phasor data
wCurrent phasor data
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 200632 32
A more Robust SE with PMU data
Synchronized Phasors
PMUPMU
PDC- Utility A
Time point Tables for all PMU
Processed data
Monitoring
Applications Input
PMUPMU
PDC-Other utilities
Time point Tables for all PMU
Processed data
Monitoring
Applications Input
PDC-Other utilities
Time point Tables for all PMU
Processed data
Monitoring
Applications Input
SCADA
Voltages
Currents
Frequency
SCADA
Voltages
Currents
Frequency
PMU Data Processing
PMUPMU
PMUPMU
GPSGPS
Local/Global warning signals
Robust State Estimation
i-Substation
Localized SE
n-Substation
Localized SE
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 200633 33
Recent SE Experience with PMUs
u Demonstrate benefits of using real-time PMU data on SE
wUse real-time data snapshot from the control center SE
u Perform Studies to assess:
wPMU Sampling Impact on SCADA data
wPMU Local and Global Impact
wUse PMU data from neighboring external systems
wAccuracy of SE solution
wRobustness of SE solution
wReliability of SE solution over time
uOnsite demonstrations
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 200634 34
Benefits Realized:
u SE quickly identified bad measurement data at the TVA PDC:
wSome values were off by sq. root of 3, some scaling issues; some were off by 120 degrees…
u PMU data accuracy class was less than we had hoped.
wOngoing EIPP/IEEE standards work will help
uWith just relatively few PMU data (compared to thousands of SCADA data), only local benefits were realized.
wNeed many more PMUs relative to SCADA data to see global benefits
u Substation topology telemetry errors/anomalies were identified (big help for the SE analyst!)
u Need for enhanced metrics to evaluate SE solution performance
u Need to evaluate side-by-side with an operational SE
wAugment operational SE SCADA data with new PMU data
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 200635 35
Next Steps….PMU-SE Evaluation project continues
uParticipants:
wTVA, Entergy, Manitoba Hydro, Idaho Power, PG&E, ORNL, NE Univ, First Energy*, BPA*
uObjectives:
wAutomate PMU/PDC data transfer into the EMS
wImplement a parallel online SE in control center
wSimulate growth of PMUs for next few years and perform case studies to evaluate benefits
wImplement comprehensive SE metrics to faciltate evaluation of SE performance
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 200636 36
Future of SE?
Independent of SCADA and Network ModelLinear SE?
Entire electrical interconnection
PMUs: Growth
V & angle
V & angle
V & angle
MW ~ angle diff
MW ~ angle diff
»System becomes
observable with around 50% stations
with PMU
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 200637 37
Making Decisions in Control Centers
REACTIVE
PREVENTIVE
PREDICTIVE
PROACTIVECourtesy of PNNL
CIGRE Conference – June 05-06, 200638 38
u Look-ahead simulation for real-time system prediction and disturbance mitigation
u Framework for Decision Support Systems
Advanced Situational Awareness & Decision Support System