34
Phase V Watershed Model We have 1994-2000 flows, revised March 2006. Used to drive CH3D We have May 2006 Phase V loads for WQM. Revisions to Phase V loads are possible

Phase V Watershed Model

  • Upload
    stian

  • View
    33

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Phase V Watershed Model. We have 1994-2000 flows, revised March 2006. Used to drive CH3D We have May 2006 Phase V loads for WQM. Revisions to Phase V loads are possible. Phase IV.3 Loads. Phase V Loads. Phase IV.3 Loads. Phase V Loads. Phase IV.3 Loads. Phase V Loads. Phase IV.3 Loads. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Phase V Watershed Model

Phase V Watershed Model

• We have 1994-2000 flows, revised March 2006. Used to drive CH3D

• We have May 2006 Phase V loads for WQM.

• Revisions to Phase V loads are possible

Page 2: Phase V Watershed Model

Phase IV.3 Loads

Phase V Loads

Page 3: Phase V Watershed Model

Phase IV.3 Loads

Phase V Loads

Page 4: Phase V Watershed Model

Phase IV.3 Loads

Phase V Loads

Page 5: Phase V Watershed Model

Phase IV.3 Loads

Phase V Loads

Page 6: Phase V Watershed Model

Phase IV.3 Loads

Phase V Loads

Page 7: Phase V Watershed Model
Page 8: Phase V Watershed Model
Page 9: Phase V Watershed Model
Page 10: Phase V Watershed Model
Page 11: Phase V Watershed Model
Page 12: Phase V Watershed Model
Page 13: Phase V Watershed Model

Conclusions• Total nitrogen and phosphorus loads appear to

go down

• Tributaries are more sensitive than main bay. Changes largely in most upstream stations

• Scatter is reduced for nitrogen and phosphorus

• No consistent difference for solids

• No fundamental change in calibration status

Page 14: Phase V Watershed Model

Sub-Grid-Scale SAV Model

Page 15: Phase V Watershed Model

For every model cell, we have the following area increments:

•< 0.5 m

•0.5 m < d < 1 m

•1 m < d < 1.5 m

•1.5 m < d < 2 m

Keeping track of these areas and the SAV within will allow us to compute SAV area and compare to CBP data base

Page 16: Phase V Watershed Model

Status

• We will complete detailed examination of SAV in four key segments, one for each species.

• We will look at annual areas for total and ten largest segments

• SAV is currently implemented for one species, Vallisneria, everywhere. We need to tune and incorporate two more species

Page 17: Phase V Watershed Model

CBP criteria for SAV survival is optical depth less than 1.6 to 2

Page 18: Phase V Watershed Model
Page 19: Phase V Watershed Model
Page 20: Phase V Watershed Model

Optical Model

• Model developed by Charles Gallegos, SERC

• Rigorous calculation of diffuse light attenuation based on inherent optical properties of color, total suspended solids, chlorophyll

• Parameter set from this study and other CBP-sponsored efforts

Page 21: Phase V Watershed Model

Optical Model

• Parameter set varies seasonally and, potentially, in 78 CBPS

• A good deal of judgment was involved in parameter assignment when observations were unavailable.

• The calculation is enormously time-consuming. Chuck created a 2,000,000 element look-up table that is incorporated in our model.

Page 22: Phase V Watershed Model

Old Attenuation Model

New Attenuation Model

Page 23: Phase V Watershed Model

Old Attenuation Model

New Attenuation Model

Page 24: Phase V Watershed Model
Page 25: Phase V Watershed Model

Old Attenuation Model

New Attenuation Model

Page 26: Phase V Watershed Model
Page 27: Phase V Watershed Model
Page 28: Phase V Watershed Model

Estuarine Phosphorus Model

• Initial coding of PIP in water quality model

• PIP assumed to be completely inert

• Behaves as TSS

Sa n d-si ze

Ex ch . P

R efrac to r y P

Silt /C lay-siz e

E xch . P

R efr acto ry P

R esu sp en d ed

E xch . P

R efr acto ry P

D iss ol ved

P h o sp h ate

R efr acto ryP artic u late

O rg an icP h os p h or u s

L a b ilePa rticu late

Or g an icPh o sp h o ru s

D isso lv edO rg an ic

P h o sp h or u s

Sediments

T w oZ o o pl an kto n

G ro u p s

T h r ee A lg alG ro u p s

m in er aliz atio n

h yd ro lysis

p re da tio n

resp ir atio n

min

eral

izat

ion u

pta

ke

Se ttlin g a nd res u sp en sio n

P articulate Ino rganic P

E xtern al L o ad in g

D O P Up take ?

Sa n d-si ze

Ex ch . P

R efrac to r y P

Silt /C lay-siz e

E xch . P

R efr acto ry P

R esu sp en d ed

E xch . P

R efr acto ry P

D iss ol ved

P h o sp h ate

R efr acto ryP artic u late

O rg an icP h os p h or u s

R efr acto ryP artic u late

O rg an icP h os p h or u s

L a b ilePa rticu late

Or g an icPh o sp h o ru s

L a b ilePa rticu late

Or g an icPh o sp h o ru s

D isso lv edO rg an ic

P h o sp h or u s

Sediments

T w oZ o o pl an kto n

G ro u p s

T h r ee A lg alG ro u p s

T h r ee A lg alG ro u p s

m in er aliz atio n

h yd ro lysis

p re da tio n

resp ir atio n

min

eral

izat

ion u

pta

ke

Se ttlin g a nd res u sp en sio n

P articulate Ino rganic P

E xtern al L o ad in g

D O P Up take ?

Page 29: Phase V Watershed Model

70% of Choptank PP is PIP

47% of Potomac PP is PIP

Page 30: Phase V Watershed Model

58% of Susquehanna PP is PIP

62% of Patuxent PP is PIP

Page 31: Phase V Watershed Model
Page 32: Phase V Watershed Model
Page 33: Phase V Watershed Model

With PIP

No PIP

Page 34: Phase V Watershed Model

With PIP

No PIP