34
Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson , Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson, Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson, Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

Phantom to test MUGA software

Bill Thomson , Joe O’BrienNigel Williams

Page 2: Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson, Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

Not New!

Phantom developed some years ago

need to test amplitude and phase component

not designed for ejection fraction

Page 3: Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson, Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

Normal / Abnormal MUGA scan

Page 4: Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson, Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

Single Harmonic Fourier

At each pixel position, we fit a curve based on first term of Fourier series

a + b.sin(t) + c.cos(t)

= A.sin(t + )

the first harmonic is a sinusoid function with the fundamental frequency and a phase angle .

Page 5: Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson, Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

Sum of Cos and Sin terms

+ =

Page 6: Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson, Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

Sum of Cos and Sin terms

+ =

Page 7: Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson, Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

Sum of Cos and Sin terms

• Frequency does not change• phase change only

+ =

Page 8: Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson, Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

Sum of Cos and Sin terms

• Frequency does not change• phase change only

+ =

Page 9: Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson, Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

Single harmonic Fourier fit

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

1 5 9 13 17 21

A

For each pixel,

AAmplitude functional imageextent of change

Phase functional imagetiming

Page 10: Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson, Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

Amplitude and Phase

Amplitude

how much movement

Phase

onset of contraction

15% threshold (from amplitude)

histogram of phase in -

whole image

ED L ventricle region

Page 11: Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson, Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

Test Procedure

Need to input sinusoid terms

want amplitude range 0 - 100%

want phase values 0 - 360

Page 12: Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson, Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

Sinusoid shape

A A

Page 13: Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson, Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

Sinusoid shape

A A

Page 14: Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson, Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

Curves generated

Page 15: Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson, Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

Curves generated

Page 16: Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson, Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

rotating plane phantom

Page 17: Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson, Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

Amplitude and phase

Page 18: Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson, Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

Amplitude and phase

Page 19: Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson, Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

Phase direction

note 90 degree shift in phase angle

Phase should follow the phantom

Phase is actually going in opposite direction

Page 20: Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson, Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

Change of ED ROI

Page 21: Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson, Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

Effect of change in ED position

Page 22: Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson, Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

Different ROI position

Page 23: Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson, Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

Phantom for EF curve creation

• Perimeter of phantom based on EF curve

• similar effects seen

• shows robust Fourier fit at low ejection fraction and counts

Page 24: Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson, Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

Previous work - different processor

Area of LV was delayedphase shows early contraction!!phase was reversed

Page 25: Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson, Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

Previous work - different processor

Area of LV was delayedphase shows early contraction!!phase was reversed

Corrected program

Page 26: Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson, Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

Higher Harmonic testing

1st harmonic

Page 27: Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson, Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

Higher Harmonic testing

1st harmonic 2nd harmonic

Page 28: Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson, Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

Higher Harmonic testing

1st harmonic

3rd harmonic

2nd harmonic

Page 29: Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson, Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

3 Harmonic phantom

Page 30: Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson, Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

3 harmonic phantom

Fourier curve fit tries to fit first EF type component only

Page 31: Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson, Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

3 harmonic phantom , different ROI

Page 32: Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson, Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

3 harmonic phantom , different ROI

Page 33: Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson, Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

3 harmonic fit to noisy data

Page 34: Phantom to test MUGA software Bill Thomson, Joe O’Brien Nigel Williams

Issues

• Phase angle appears to run in wrong direction

• Will not affect aneurism detection

• Amplitude and phase dependent on ROI

• Fourier fits to CDBS curve

• Time to Peak Fill is based on Fourier curve

• Suggest use 4 harmonic fit routinely