PH 101 Final Review

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/9/2019 PH 101 Final Review

    1/4

    PH 101Fall 2014Review sheet - FinalProf. Drake

    NotesDoestevsky

    Attempt at truthful autobiographyConsistency & inconsistencytte!"ts at self-#e$nition

    ever evolvin% creatre

    cant 't ever #e$ne yorself as one thin%

    we !ake #i(erent #ecisions all the ti!e

    Pleasure and/in pain

    are o"en to )ein% !ani"late# )y s overti!e

    o *n#er%ron# +an has taste# his own #issa"oint!en# so

    !any ti!es that it )eco!es a co!fort ,one his #isa""ointe# )ecase nor!ality ha)it

    he fa!iliar feelin% )eco!es a weir# way for

    "leasre.

    he clin%s to that "leasre

    Determinism- /elief that natre an# )iolo%ical !ake" #eter!ine h!an action

    free will is an illsion.Spontaneity/caprice

    he has no self-consistency we will always contra#ict orselves

    o irrationality

    o ca"rice-- s)ect to chan%e at any instant #esires3

    o s"ontaneity

    Cultural contradiction+o#ern science5stice syste!

    )oth are fnctions of a very li!ite# conce"tion of what the h!an

    intellect is

    yo are li!itin% the free#o!s yo have

    6we are con#e!ne# to )e free6 -7atre

    8n%oin% fn#a!ental res"onsi)ility to se or free#o! an# se orcreativity.

    Rationality & irrationalityFor the in#ivi#al

    o choosin% 6)a#6 thin%s !i%ht )e %oo# for s

    o if everyone else !akes the sa!e #ecisions as yo h!an

    )ehavior )eco!es "re#icta)le yo lose yor ni9eness

  • 8/9/2019 PH 101 Final Review

    2/4

    o in or#er to have !eanin% in or lives we nee# irrationality

    self is !a#e of a set of i!"lses

    o 6or free#o! is )etter than or self-interest6 we are inherently creative an# free )ein%s

    so!eti!es we !st )e #iso)e#ient

    o 8r #ecisions are not always ors they are case# )ynknown forces.

    For societyo 6Constrctin% a crystal "alace6--Utopia

    o to )e flly rational wol# %et ri# of con:ict

    Existentialist believe

    !any "eo"le #e"rive their own free#o!

    !any "eo"le acce"t or %o alon% with that they are tol#

    o we are tol# )y society what we shol# want

    cltral valescsto!s are or own "ersonal #ecisions

    tra#itions are also choices

    ;tistentialists )elieve that a)sr#ity e>"lains e>istence

    o 6there's no reason to e>ist6

    atheist

    ;n a niverse that is "ointless yo !ake yor own reason.

    !"ndependent #anting$

    "eo"le are not evil not willin%ly 7ocrates3

    o

    if "eo"le knew what was %oo# they wol#n't co!!it evilo Peo"le #on't nee# "nish!ent they nee# e#cation.

    "ntellect vs #hole person

    so!e "eo"le want to )ehave like the intellect has the $rst an# last

    wor#o )t there are !any other "arts to a h!an %ive yo yor

    #esires intellect is yor e%o or rational !in#

  • 8/9/2019 PH 101 Final Review

    3/4

    Fre#%acground on Sigmund 'reud

    - ?as an atheist- raine# in har# sciences- "hsycoloy- @ove# Areek cltre- B?e are )on# to )e in con:ict with orselves.

    Superego- oice of athority- ?iel#s a "ower of "nish!ent

    -?orks )y in:ictvint "ain "on "erson

    o hro%h %ilt or re!orse

    - ;nternali,e# for! of "nish!ent"d

    - *nconscios- the #arker si#eo %%ressive a%ency

    - /sy wantin%- we want "leasre or a)sence of "ain3 "leasre"rinci"le3

    o Power secrity se>

    Don

  • 8/9/2019 PH 101 Final Review

    4/4

    - here are ol# "arts that were even reconstrcte# fro! even ol#er"art

    - 7trctres early in or lives contines with s s)consciosly- 6?hat is "ast in !ental life !ay )e "reserve# an# is not necessarily

    erase#.6!Purpose$ of human life

    - "r"ose of h!an life is not re#e!"tion in an afterlife )t theachieve!ent of ha""iness.

    Sources of unhappiness- we e>"erience nha""iness fro! the followin% three sorces- 13 or )o#y- 23 the e>ternal worl#- 3 or relations to other !en. ?e e!"loy varios strate%ies to avoi#

    #is"leasreG )y isolatin% orselves volntarily )eco!in% !e!)ers

    of the h!an co!!nity i.e. contri)tin% to a co!!on en#eavor3or in:encin% or own )o#ies. ;nto>ication is a "articlarly"revalent !etho# of in:ence.

    7)li!ationtransfor!e# elevate# !ore !il# "leasre- ?e fon# a new !ore socially acce"ta)le for! of $n#in% "leasre.

    "nability to experience happiness consistently- ;t is i!"ossi)le to achieve this- 6Ha""iness is a "ro)le! of the econo!ics of the in#ivi#al's li)i#o6

    )o# #e cope #ith unhappiness13 #e:ection of "ain an# #isa""oint!ent thro%h "lanne# #istractions323 s)stittive satisfactions !ainly thro%h the re"lace!ent of reality )y

    art33 into>icatin% s)stances. Fre# concl#es that reli%ion cannot )e clearlycate%ori,e# within this sche!a