Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2/14/2018
1
Posterior Fossa Syndrome: Rehabilitation Across the Continuum
Lindsey Christoffersen, PT, DPT, C/NDTSherry Lockett, PT, DPT
• The speakers have no conflicts of interest to disclose
• Any equipment or materials mentioned in the presentation are
available to the speakers at their facility
• The speakers have no financial gain in mentioning any specific
products
Conflict of Interest Disclosure
At the conclusion of this session, participants will be able to:
1. Discuss the pathophysiology and clinical characteristics of Posterior
Fossa Syndrome (PFS).
2. Discuss the role of each member of the interdisciplinary team in the
comprehensive management of patients with PFS.
3. Identify and discuss appropriate evaluation tools and treatment
strategies to address the impairments and functional limitations
associated with PFS across a variety of settings.
Learning Objectives
Near the base of the skull
Contains the brainstem and
cerebellum
- Brainstem: breathing, heart rate, swallowing, alertness, digestion
- Cerebellum: movement, posture, balance, coordination
The Posterior Fossa1,2
Image courtesy of University of Rochester Medical Center
Account for 60-70% of all pediatric brain tumors
~40% to 50% of these are
medulloblastoma
Posterior Fossa Tumors3
Reported incidence following PF tumor surgery ranges from 2%-50%
Older studies often report lower numbers
- Failure to recognize the syndrome?
Gadgil et al. (2016) knowledge update
- Occurs in 8-24% of children following resection of PF masses
Robertson et al. (2006)
- Reported PFS in 24% of their study population (N=450)
Incidence of PFS4-6
2/14/2018
2
Most common malignant brain tumor of childhood
- Accounts for 20% of all childhood brain tumors
- 250-500 children are diagnosed in the U.S. annually
- Primarily found in children < 16 years old
Medulloblastoma7
Image courtesy of RM DeSouza and colleagues
Risk Stratification8
Standard RiskStandard Risk
>3 years of age>3 years of age
No detectable metastatic disease
No detectable metastatic disease
Near or total resectionNear or total resection
High RiskHigh Risk
<3 years of age<3 years of age
Overt metastatic diseaseOvert metastatic disease
Gross residual diseaseGross residual disease
More recent studies indicate that medulloblastoma is made up of distinct molecular subgroups that respond differently to
treatment
- WNT (10%, favorable)
- SHH (30%, relatively favorable)
- Non-WNT & non-SHH (60%, generally poorer prognosis)
Genetic alterations within these subgroups also contribute to prognostication and treatment decisions
Additional Prognostic Factors8
Surgery
Radiation
Chemotherapy
Treatment & Survival7
5-year survival rates:
- Local disease: 70%-80%
- Metastatic disease: 60%
Posterior Fossa Syndrome (PFS)
Cerebellar Mutism (CM)
Transient Cerebellar
Mutism (TCM)
Mutism and Subsequent
Dysarthria (MSD)
Cerebellar Mutism
Syndrome (CMS)
Cerebellar Cognitive Affective
Syndrome (CCAS)
Common Terms9
Deficits
- Neurologic (motor)
- Neuropsychologic (cognitive and affective/behavioral)
- Neurolinguistic
Most commonly seen in children after posterior fossa tumor
surgery
- May also occur following trauma, vascular incidents, or infections
Clinical Characteristics4,9
2/14/2018
3
Motor
• Ataxia• Dysmetria
• Dysphagia• Dysarthria• Hypotonia• Hemiparesis• Nystagmus• Oculomotor problems• Urinary
retention/incontinence
Speech/Language
• Cerebellar mutism• Naming problems
• Verbal fluency• Dysarthria• Slowed speech• Decreased verbal
output• Short phrases• Distorted vowels• Prolonged phonemes• Mono- pitch/loudness• Hypernasality• Vocal tremor
Affect/Behavior
• Depression• Irritability
• Lability• Apathy• Anxiety• Forced crying/laughter• Transient eye closure• Impulsivity
Cognitive
• Attention• Memory
• Executive functioning• Visuospatial skills• Processing speed• Verbal comprehension• Reading/writing
difficulties
Postoperative Deficits9,10
Decreased speech or mutism
Dysphagia
Hypotonia
Ataxia
Mood changes
Neurological deficits
Most Common Deficits3,9,11
Transient mutism
- Delayed onset (0-15 days, mean 2 days)
- Limited duration (1 day-2.5 years, mean 43 days)
- Recovery period marked by dysarthria
- Not uncommon for patient to speak a few words after surgery but unable to speak the next day
Not all patients become completely mute
- May be limited to single words or short sentences (not easily elicited)
Hallmark Characteristic: Mutism9
Duration of mutism varies
- Gadgil et al. 2016 knowledge update
• Average: 8 weeks
• Range: 4 days to 5 months
Correlation found between duration of mutism and severity of neurologic symptoms
Speech Outcomes12,13
Slow rate: 33 patients
Short phrases: 13
Hypophonia: 10
When Speech Begins to Return13
Latent onset of 1-6 days
- Children have normal speech prior to onset
Total absence of speech
- Not of nonverbal utterances such as crying, screaming
Worsening neurological symptoms
- Ataxia, pyramidal paresis, oculomotor dysfunction, diminished facial expression
- Loss of bladder and bowel control
Behavioral disturbances
- Apathy, depressed affect, agitation, irritability, emotional lability
Clinical Characteristics: Acute Stage13
2/14/2018
4
Kirk et al. (1995): Retrospective study of children after PF surgery
Timeline of Onset3
Postoperative Symptoms
Post op in ICU
Able to move purposefully, focus on an object, make some attempts to verbalize when intubated; similar to preoperative state with expected ataxia
and dysmetria
Within 24−107 hours
Neurologic status changes without an identifiable factor (e.g., no change in vitals, intracranial pressure monitoring, or radiographic abnormality)
Timeline of Onset3
Postoperative Symptoms
Within 24−27 hours
Facial weakness and nystagmus
Mean time 33 hours
Weakness of upper extremities
Mean time 40−58 hours
Weakness of lower extremities, emotional lability, irritability, random nonpurposeful movements of extremities, difficulty verbalizing, and mutism
Differs for each patient
More severe symptoms early in recovery ���� symptoms that
persist longer
Onset, Severity, & Duration5,12
Absence or reduction in
speech 1-2 days post-op
Mutism 2-7 days post-op;
Profound axial hypotonia and
ataxia
Recovery of speech begins after 8 weeks (on average)
Duration of Deficits6
Kupeli et al (2011)
- Pre and post-op neurologic and psychological evaluations of children with brain
tumors having PF surgery (PFS developed in 25% of patients)
Multiple theories, but no clear culprit
- Damage to dentato-thalamo-cortical (DTC)
pathway
- Damage to the vermis
- Bilateral dentate nuclei damage
This damage may result from
- Poor cerebellar perfusion due to vasospasm
- Injury related to surgery
- Postoperative edema
Causes5,11,14
Avula et al. 2016
Prospective review of postoperative MRI
- 10 patients who developed PFS
- 13 randomly selected patients who did not develop PFS
Preoperative Imaging
- Rostral position of tumor within 4th ventricle associated with PFS (P=0.035)
Causes: Morris et al15
2/14/2018
5
Postoperative Imaging
- PFS group had bilateral multi-focal postop
injury (edema)
• 90% of PFS group had damage to ≥ 3 of the following: Pons, dentate nuclei, superior cerebellar peduncles, midbrain
– None of the unaffected patients had ≥
3 structures involved
- 80% of PFS group had bilateral involvement
• Compared to 15% of patients without PFS
Causes: Morris et al15 Risk Factors5,16
Medulloblastoma diagnosis
Midline tumors
Tumors involving the vermis
Tumors high in the 4th ventricle
Brainstem invasion
Retrospective study of 63 children with medulloblastoma; PFS developed in 18 patients (29%)
Predictors found included:
- Brainstem invasion
- Midline tumor location
- Younger age
- Absence of radiographic residual tumor
Conclusions:
- Children with midline tumors exhibiting brain stem invasion are at increased risk for PFS
- More aggressive surgeries may result in increased incidence of PFS
Risk Factors16
Many patients suffer from long-term sequelae
- Mutism tends to be transient, but speech rarely returns to being completely
normal
- Increased risk for neurocognitive impairment
- Neurological deficits, mainly ataxia
- Decreased quality of life and environmental access
Looking Long-Term13,17,19
Palmer et al. 2010
- 25 patients with PFS following medulloblastoma resection
- 25 matched patients without PFS being treated on same protocol
- Significant differences (p<0.01) between groups
Patients with PFS
- Demonstrated significantly lower performance in processing speed, attention, working memory, executive processes, cognitive efficiency, reading, spelling, and mathematics
Long-Term Neurocognitive Outcomes17
Robertson et al. 2006
- PFS present in 24% of patients (N=450)
- 92% of patients presented with severe or moderate PFS
• 43% severe, 49% moderate
• Mutism and ataxia were most frequently judged as severe
Long-Term Speech & Motor Outcomes5
2/14/2018
6
Robertson et al. 2006
- 1-year post-diagnosis
Long-Term Speech & Motor Outcomes5
• 92% had ataxia• 66% had speech and language dysfunction• 59% had some degree of global intellectual handicap
Initially Rated Severe
• 88% had abnormal coordination• 25% had speech and language dysfunction• 17% had some degree of global intellectual handicap
Initially Rated Moderate
Steinbock et al (2003)
Long-Term Speech & Motor Outcomes18
Brinkman et al. 2013
- In-home evaluations of brain tumor survivors ≥ 18 years old (N=78) and
matched population-based controls (N=78)
• Environmental access
• Health related quality of life
• Social participation
• Demographic and treatment information
• Physical performance
• Cognitive function
• Psychological distress
- Median age of survivors was 22 years (range 18-58)
Long-Term Quality of Life19
Brinkman et al. 2013
BT survivors:
Long-Term Quality of Life19
Were more likely to avoid
aspects of physical
environment
Were more likely to report
they did not drive
Were more likely to report
decreased HRQOL
Participated less in
functional living and
social activities in their
community
Treatment of PFS12,13,20
Pharmacology
Physical Therapy
Speech Therapy
Occupational Therapy
Neuropsych
& Psychology
Child Life
Physiatry
Rehabilitation Management
2/14/2018
7
Evidence is significantly lacking regarding rehabilitation for patients with PFS
Primarily limited to case studies and case series
This may come as a shock…
Initial rapid gain of skills
- During RT and during break before chemotherapy
- Critical period for rehab
- Inpatient rehab highly recommended during this time if appropriate
Plateau during chemotherapy
- Doing our best to “hang on” to skills gained
- Typically an appropriate time to order a custom WC if indicated
More progress after completion of chemotherapy, but much
slower than initially seen
- Remaining deficits are often long-lasting
Rehab Trajectory: Our Experience
� If severe PFS, patient may remain inpatient after surgery or be admitted directly inpatient if coming from an outside hospital
� May remain inpatient throughout scans and during the beginning of
radiation therapy (RT), with a break between RT and chemotherapy
� Depending on physical function and burden on caregivers, patient may remain inpatient for duration of chemotherapy
� Interdisciplinary collaboration is key
Acute Care Overview
History
- Previous level of function, activity level, previous limitations
- Home location, accessibility issues, plans to return home
- Caregivers available for training, assisting patient, equipment management
Communication & Behavior
- Alertness and orientation
- Ability to follow commands
- Ability to communicate needs (yes/no, thumbs up/down, squeezing hand)
- Mutism/ability to voice
- Flat, emotional lability
Initial Evaluation
Vision/Facial/Voice Screen
- Drooling, smiling (facial droop)
- Wet voice
- Ability to track objects, attend to objects
- Strabismus and/or nystagmus
ROM (AAROM, PROM) & Strength
Neurological screen
- Muscle tone
- Clonus
- Reflexes
- Coordination and motor control (finger to nose/finger, ataxia)
Initial Evaluation
Functional Mobility
- Bed mobility
- Sitting balance
- Sit <-> stand
- Standing
- Transfers
- Ambulation and stair negotiation
- Gross motor abilities
- Equipment needs
Initial Evaluation
2/14/2018
8
14-item instrument
Examines functional balance
- Steady state
- Anticipatory
Administration time < 20 minutes
Validated for children with mild, moderate, and severe motor
impairments
- Athetosis, hemiplegia, hypotonia, spastic diplegia, s/p brain tumor resection
Pediatric Balance Scale21,22 Pediatric Balance Scale21,22
Pediatric Balance Scale21,22
Cut off scores
- Based on typical performance
- Scoring below cut score may indicate decreased functional balance
- Should be interpreted with findings from clinical examination
Pediatric Balance Scale22
Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID)
- 5.83 points for PBS total
- 2.92 points for static items
- 2.92 points for dynamic items
Pediatric Balance Scale22
Initial Presentation
Ataxia
Axial hypotonia
Max A –dependent transfers
Non-ambulatory
or max A for
ambulation
Mod –Max A for
static sitting and standing
2/14/2018
9
� Stay focused on discharge plan
� Teaching parents/caregivers safety with mobility and transfers
� Caregiver education on task carryover in home exercise program
� Maximizing patient ability to perform assisted/independent mobility/transfers and desired activities
� Standing and ambulation if possible
� Order appropriate equipment/orthotics
Goals for Acute Care
� Meet with team to communicate progress, updated goals, and discharge planning
� Interdisciplinary collaboration to incorporate behavior/speech goals into sessions � treating the whole person
Goals for Acute Care (continued)
Treatment Goals:1. Patient will be able to perform a stand pivot transfer from bed to chair with moderate
assistance with an assistive device with verbal cueing for sequencing and increased time
allowed for activity to assist caregivers with mobility tasks.
2. Patient will be able to tolerate sitting at edge of bed with minimal assistance with bilateral
LE support and use of bilateral UE on surface x 4 minutes with independent head control
to assist with a dressing activity.
Acute Care Interventions
3-5 days/week
30-60 minute sessions
Individual or co-treats
Bed mobility
Transfers
Standing & ambulation
Caregiver Training
Bed Mobility
- Rolling to both sides (sequencing LEs, UEs, and head)
- Supine <-> sitting (propping on elbow, maintaining alignment)
- Repositioning of self for comfort, pressure relief (bridging, scooting in bed)
Sitting Activities
- May require assistance of two people
- Be aware of input being given and ability of patient to handle increased stimuli
- Position of support (anterior vs posterior)/
- Support surface (mat vs bed)
- Use of mirrors/stools/auditory/manual cueing/weights/cervical collar
- Consider ataxia and dysmetria present with movement
Acute Care Interventions
Static Sitting
- Initial position of head/neck/shoulders/trunk/pelvis
- Increasing length of time holding position
- Having patient attempt postural corrections
Dynamic Sitting
- Weight shifting
- Reaching inside and outside of base of support
- Ability to return to midline
- Scooting on surface
Acute Care Interventions
Transfers
- Dependent � sliding board, patient lift
- Use assistive devices as patient’s strength and balance improves
- Sit <-> stand
Standing
- Static (tilt table, standing frame)
- Dynamic (parallel bars, walker)
• Weight shifting
• Postural control
• Step-ups, weight bearing through weaker extremity
Acute Care Interventions (continued)
2/14/2018
10
Ambulation
- Parallel bars (forwards, backwards, lateral stepping)
- Walker (distance, weight shifting, step length control)
- Hand held assistance
Strength & Endurance
- Gentle stretching of trunk and extremities
- Strengthening of individual muscle groups
- Recumbent bike
- Sequencing of muscle groups to make exercises functional
Acute Care Interventions (continued)
Daily education to family and staff
- Allow patient to initiate task if able
- Stretching
- Educate on muscle tone
- Carryover of activities
- Short bouts of activity, allowing for rest breaks
Consider attention and ability to follow commands
Use activities familiar to patient
Be prepared to modify session based on patient presentation
Use interdisciplinary team members
Special Considerations
Interdisciplinary team that meets biweekly
- Neuropsychology & Psychology
- Speech, Occupational, & Physical Therapy
- School
- Child Life Services
- Clinical Nurse Specialists
- Social Work
Discuss patient status, goals, and potential barriers
- Plan interdisciplinary goal for each team member to work on with patient
- Goal example: Pt. will choose an activity in each session when presented with 2 options to increase initiation.
Acute Neurological Injury (ANI) Rounds
During break between RT and chemotherapy
- 5-6 week break
- Close to home when possible
- If unable or unwilling to participate in inpatient rehab, encourage intensive outpatient program
- Often shorter stays in inpatient rehab secondary to slow progress (FIM) and/or desire to be at home
Transition to Inpatient Rehab
Critical time to maximize return of function
Transition to Inpatient Rehab
Can completely
focus on PT, OT, ST
No other rigorous daily
treatments
Less fatigue (no radiation
or chemotherapy)
16-year-old female
- Diagnosis of medulloblastoma, status post gross total resection
- Presented to signs of PFS day +7 from surgery
- Global ataxia, emotional lability, dysphagia, mutism
- Patient underwent 6 weeks of RT and weekly vincristine
- Main patient and family goal was to return home
Discharge planning
- 3 publicly funded options: adult rehab center, pediatric ABI program (far from home), community based rehab
- Patient and family opted for community rehab to remain close to home
Discharge Case Study23
2/14/2018
11
Strengthening StretchingBalance
Training & Coordination
Gait Training
EnduranceOrthotic
PrescriptionEquipment HEP
Outpatient Therapy Outpatient Therapy
3 days per week
30-45 minute sessions
Primarily individual
treats
Occasional co-treats
with challenging
tasks
� Gain and maintain as much function as possible during chemotherapy
� Ongoing education regarding activity expectations and rehab trajectory
� Monitor equipment needs, order custom WC if appropriate
Goals for Outpatient Therapy
Treatment Goals:1. Patient will ambulate 500’ with least restrictive assistive device without LOB,
provided SBA for balance and verbal cueing 25% of the time to increase step
length and to narrow BOS.
2. Patient will reach outside of BOS anteriorly in standing to retrieve 5 objects with minimal A to achieve weight shift and to maintain balance.
NuStep, Total Gym
Emphasis on eccentric/graded control
- Squats (don’t pop the ball), stoop and recover
- TheraBand (control band back to starting position)
- Step-ups/downs
- Sit <-> stand
- Jumping, jumping down, hopping, descending stairs
- Jump/hop and freeze
Postural muscle strengthening
- Glutes, abdominals
- Emphasis on engaging abdominals/upright posture during functional tasks
Strengthening
Will sometimes perform in therapy sessions, but often have family/patient perform as part of HEP
- Ankle dorsiflexion
- Hamstrings
- Trunk rotation, extension
Stretching
Control of dynamic movement
- Weight shifting in sitting � standing
- Activation of glutes and abdominals to perform true weight shift
Movement in multiple planes
Coordination
- Timing, sequencing, amount of force, spatial awareness
- Zip Ball, catching and throwing a ball, weighted therapy bar ball taps, squat <->
stand, jumping (in place, to a target)
Obstacle negotiation
- Small obstacles (hurdles, River Stones, ramps), unstable surfaces (AirEx foam,
DynaDisc), unpredictable surfaces (grass, gravel)
Balance Training & Coordination
2/14/2018
12
Narrowed base of support
- Walking between balance beams
- Romberg position (eyes open, eyes closed)
- Tandem stance on line � balance beam � elevated balance beam
- Single limb stance
• Trapping soccer ball
• Flamingo freeze
Balance Training & Coordination
Pre-gait activities
- Foot to target
• Make increasingly difficult: heel strike when bringing foot to target, weight shift onto limb once foot is on target, weight shift with step through to next target
- Step up and over therapy bench for stair prep
LiteGait on treadmill or over ground
Ambulation with appropriate assistive device or in || bars
- Anterior walker, posterior walker, hemi walker, cane
- Ambulation through obstacle course
Begin working on stairs, curb, and obstacle negotiation as skills
progress
Gait Training
Transfers
Standing
Ambulation
NuStep
Recumbent or adaptive bike
Advanced:
- Floor hockey
- Soccer
- Gross motor bingo
- Yoga
Endurance
Use of PRAFOs initially to prevent plantar flexion contractures, pressure wounds
Fit for appropriate orthotics ASAP
- AFOs (solid, hinged, carbon fiber)
- SMOs
- Arch Support
Consider use of anti-hyperextension or hinged knee sleeve with
instability
Orthotic Prescription
Often difficult to anticipate secondary to rapid improvements initially, followed by plateau
Begin with loaner equipment when possible
- Tilt in space/Convaid Rodeo � Standard or Semi-custom upright � Custom upright
- Typically appropriate to purchase a custom wheelchair during chemotherapy
Equipment
Daily practice is emphasized
Primarily functional mobility and gross motor tasks
Train families to practice with assistive devices outside of
therapy
Home Exercise Program
2/14/2018
13
Difficulty following commands
- Often due to motor deficits
Decreased/absent volitional speech
- May be able to voice when laughing or crying but not on command
Poor oral motor skills
Receptive skills often relatively intact
- May be difficult to detect due to motor and speech deficits
- Speak TO them, not at or in front of them
Role of Speech Therapy: Speech Outcomes24
Initial goals and activities
- Alternative means of
communication
• Gestures
• GoTalk
• Alphabet board
• Picture communication board
- Vocalizing on command
- Identifying pictures
- Following bodily commands
Role of Speech Therapy: Speech Outcomes24
As speech-language skills progress
- Formal testing is initiated
- Address dysarthria, initiation, and
executive functioning
Retrospective medical record review of 19 patients with PFS
Role of Speech Therapy: Swallowing Outcomes3
Symptom Number of Children
Dysphagia 7 (37%)
Impaired gag reflex 3 (16%)
Facial weakness 4 (21%)
Institution of enteral/parenteral feeds 10 (53%)
Ability to swallow and mood typically improved before recovery of speech
- May not indicate normal swallow
- Mood changes may persist if patient is unable to communicate wants/needs
effectively
- Some patients made full recovery; swallowing difficulties persisted in others (sometimes long term
Role of Speech Therapy: Swallowing Outcomes3,11,24
Difficulty with oral
motor movements
Decreased strength
Difficulty managing secretions
Typically require
NG- or G-tube
Initial goals and activities
- Following oral motor commands
- Oral motor exercises
- Swallowing exercises
- Postural/compensatory strategies
- Provision of adaptive equipment
- Instrumental exam (if ready)
Role of Speech Therapy: Swallowing Outcomes24
As swallowing skills progress
- Instrumental exam (when ready)
- Advance PO diet as appropriate
- Continue exercises, compensatory strategies
Significant UE ataxia
- Typically worse unilaterally
Visual deficits
- Nystagmus, diplopia
Decreased level of functional performance
Decreased participation in ADL & IADLs
Difficulty with motor planning
Sensory concerns, emotional lability
Difficulty following commands
Role of Occupational Therapy24
2/14/2018
14
Initial goals and activities
- Increasing independence with
ADLs• Specifically dressing, toileting, and
hygiene
- Increasing mobility to participate in ADLs
- Increasing visual skills
- Functional reaching and strengthening
- Provide toileting and bathing equipment
Role of Occupational Therapy24
As speech-language skills progress
- Weight bearing activities (side sitting, quadruped)
- Fine motor activities to improve coordination and strength
- School based skills
- Handwriting
- Independence in higher level self
care (tying shoes, buttons)
- Functional cognition
X Rigorous RT schedule, often with sedation
X Side effects from chemotherapy
- Nausea/emesis
- Anemia
- Thrombocytopenia
X Infections
X Slow progress due to nature of PFS
X Cancer-related fatigue
X Communication challenges
X Psychosocial considerations
Barriers to Achieving Goals
Myelosuppression is a major side effect of chemotherapy
- Potential for adverse events with stressful conditions (exercise)
• Thrombocytopenia � bleeds
• Severe anemia � cardiac arrhythmias
• Neutropenia � sepsis
Guidelines for Safe Exercise25
Retrospective chart review (Gilchrist and Tanner, 2017)
- Adverse events during or after 37 of 406 PT sessions
• Most common event was tachycardia not requiring medical intervention
- No serious adverse events occurred
Guidelines for Safe Exercise25
Cancer-Related Fatigue26
“A distressing, persistent subjective sense of physical, emotional, and/or
cognitive tiredness or exhaustion related to cancer or cancer treatment that is not proportional to recent activity and interferes with usual functioning.”
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 2017
Cancer-Related Fatigue27,28
Cancer-Related Fatigue
Cancer Treatment
Burden
Disease Burden
Co-Morbid Conditions
Psychosocial Burden
2/14/2018
15
Cancer-Related Fatigue29
• Feeling tired, weary, exhausted even after a good night’s sleep
• Lack of energy/prolonged fatigue after activity
• Weakness, heaviness in arms/legs
• Listlessness or irritability
• Trouble starting or finishing tasks due to fatigue
• Needing to sleep during the day
• Unable or requiring help to do usual or desired activities
• Being too tired to eat
• Difficulty with concentration and memory
• Limiting social activities due to
fatigue
Consistent therapist when possible
- May have to introduce self and role multiple times
One voice at a time
1-2 step commands
- Consider automatic movements
- This then that statements
Allow increased time for processing
Collaborate with speech and psychology regarding
communication and cognitive abilities
Strategies for Communication
7-year-old male
- GTR medulloblastoma, 4th ventricle
- Post-op: inability to speak, left-sided weakness, irritability
- Transferred to inpatient rehabilitation hospital
• PT, OT, ST; slow progress
• Mute for a few days, then slow speech improvements but remained dysarthricwith “robotic speech”
• Gait unsteady, but able to walk without assistance; unable to negotiate stairs
• Challenging mood/behavior requiring risperidone during RT
Two years after completion of treatment
- Speech fluent, continuing to work with PT to address ongoing balance issues
- Behaviorally and emotionally at baseline
Published Case Studies20
13-year-old male
- GTR medulloblastoma
- Post-op: paucity of speech, left-sided weakness, ataxia, VI CN palsy, emotional outbursts
- Transferred to inpatient rehabilitation hospital x 6 weeks
• Made significant progress with speech and ambulation
• Mood remained flat over course of RT
At 5-year follow-up
- Performing well academically, attending college
- Continued social and emotional struggles
Published Case Studies20
3-year-old female
- Resection of posterior fossa ependymoma
- Post-op: dysarthria, right-sided weakness, unable to ambulate independently, emotional outbursts
- Began low dose risperidone to improve behavior
• Allowed for safe participation in PT and ST and completion of RT
At 5-year follow-up
- Attending school full-time
- Behavior and speech issues fully resolved
- Ongoing challenges with balance � continuing to work with PT and OT regarding these issues
Published Case Studies20
Harbourne et al. 2014
- 14-year-old female and 6-year-old female with PFS
- Completed inpatient rehabilitation and outpatient programs, discharged due to lack of progress
Neuromodulation devices on the tongue
- Static and dynamic balance activities utilizing devices
- 3 days of intensive training, followed by HEP consisting of activities performed 5 days/week for 8 weeks
Clinical improvement noted in both participants
- Improved balance beyond MCID on BBT-P
- Increase in time standing on dynamic surface
- Increased gait speed and step length
Published Case Studies30
2/14/2018
16
`
- PFS occurs in up to 24% of patients who undergo posterior fossa tumor resection
- Symptoms are often severe and last years beyond cancer treatment
- The literature strongly advises participation in rehab, but specific strategies for
management of this syndrome are lacking
- More research is needed to determine the efficacy of specific rehab interventions for this population
Summary
Questions?
1. Rehab for posterior fossa syndrome. St. Jude Children's Research Hospital. Available at: https://www.stjude.org/treatment/patient-resources/caregiver-resources/patient-family-education-sheets/rehabilitation/rehab-for-posterior-fossa-syndrome.html. Accessed October 25, 2017.
2. Adler L, Dozier T, eds. Anatomy of a Child's Brain. Anatomy of a Child's Brain - Health Encyclopedia - University of Rochester Medical Center. https://www.urmc.rochester.edu/encyclopedia/content.aspx?ContentTypeID=90&ContentID=P02588. Accessed October 25, 2017.
3. Kirk E, Howard V, Scott C. Description of posterior fossa syndrome in children after posterior fossa brain tumor surgery. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing. 1995;12(4):181-187.
4. Reed-Berendt R, Phillips B, Picton S, et al. Cause and outcome of cerebellar mutism: evidence from a systematic review. Child’s Nervous System. 2014;30(3):375-385.
5. Robertson P, Muraszko K, Holmes E, et al. Incidence and severity of postoperative cerebellar mutism syndrome in children with medulloblastoma: a prospective study by the Children’s Oncology Group. Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics. 2006;105:444-451.
6. Kupeli S, Yalcin B, Bilginer B, et al. Posterior fossa syndrome after posterior fossa surgery in children with brain tumors. Pediatric Blood and Cancer. 2011;56(2):206-210.
7. Medulloblastoma. St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. Available at: https://www.stjude.org/disease/medulloblastoma.html. Accessed November 21, 2017.
References
8. Childhood Central Nervous System Embryonal Tumors Treatment (PDQ®)–Health Professional Version. 2017. Available at: https://www.cancer.gov/types/brain/hp/child-cns-embryonal-treatment-pdq#link/_307_toc. Accessed November 28, 2017.
9. Gudrunardottir T, De Smet H, Bartha-Doering L et al. Posterior Fossa Syndrome (PFS) and Cerebellar Mutism. In: Marien P, Manto M, ed. 1st ed. London: Elsevier;2015:257-281. Available at: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=aQGdBAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA257&dq=posterior+fossa+syndrome+children&ots=yfPkzyVgI8&sig=z5I8lDm4Km4BoWa63htcnc2GVdk#v=onepage&q&f=false. Accessed November 14, 2017.
10. Law N, Greenberg M, Bouffet E, et al. Clinical and neuroanatomical predictors of cerebellar mutism syndrome. Neuro-oncology. 2012;14(10):1294-1303.
11. Steinbok P, Cochrane D, Perrin R, et al. Mutism after posterior fossa tumour resection in children: incomplete recovery on long-term follow-up. Pediatric Neurosurgery. 2003;39(4):179-183.
12. Gadgil N, Hansen D, Barry J, et al. Posterior fossa syndrome in children following tumor resection: knowledge update. Surgical Neurology International. 2016;7(Suppl 6):S179-S183.
13. Catsman-Berrevoets C. Cerebellar mutism syndrome: cause and rehabilitation. Current Opinion in Neurology. 2017;30(00).
14. Avula S, Mallucci C, Kumar R, Pizer B. Posterior fossa syndrome following brain tumor resection: review of pathophysiology and a new hypothesis on its pathogenesis. Child’s Nervous System. 2015;31:1859-1867.
15. Morris E, Phillips N, Laningham F, et al. Proximal dentatothalamocortical tract involvement in posterior fossa syndrome. Brain. 2009;132:3087-3095.
References
16. Korah MP, Esiashvili N, Mazewski CM, et al. Incidence, risks, and sequelae of posterior fossa syndrome in pediatric medulloblastoma. International Journal of Radiation Oncology* Biology* Physics. 2010;77(1):106-112.
17. Palmer S, Hassall T, Evankovich K, et al. Neurocognitive outcome 12 months following cerebellar mutism syndrome in pediatric patients with medulloblastoma. Neuro-oncology. 2010;12(12):1311-1317.
18. Steinbok P, Cochrane D, Perrin R et al. Mutism after posterior fossa tumour resection in children: incomplete recovery on long-term follow-up. Pediatric Neurosurgery. 2003;39:179-183.
19. Brinkman T, Li Z, Neglia J, et al. Restricted access to the environment and quality of life in adult survivors of childhood brain tumors. Journal of Neurooncology. 2013;111(2):195-203.
20. Lanier J, Abrams A. Posterior fossa syndrome: review of the behavioral and emotional aspects in pediatric cancer patients.
Cancer. 2017;123:551-559.
21. Franjoine M, Darr N, Held S, et al. The performance of children developing typically on the pediatric balance scale. Pediatric Physical Therapy. 2010;22(4):350-359.
22. Pediatric Balance Scale. Shirley Ryan Ability Lab. Available at: https://www.sralab.org/rehabilitation-measures/pediatric-balance-scale. Accessed January 31, 2018.
23. Pearlman L, McVittie A, Hunter K. Discharge management of an adolescent female with posterior fossa syndrome: A case report. Canadian Journal of Neuroscience Nursing. 2008;30(3).
References
24. Lyons K, Christoffersen L, Harris A. Posterior Fossa Syndrome. Marianjoy Rehabilitation Hospital. 2017.
25. Gilchrist L, Tanner L. Safety of symptom-based modification of physical therapy interventions in pediatric oncology patients with and without low blood counts. Rehabilitation Oncology. 2017;35:3-8.
26. “NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Cancer-Related Fatigue.” National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Version 2.2017 ed. Published April 10, 2017. Accessed July 11, 2017.
27. Cleveland Clinic. “Fatigue & Cancer Fatigue.” Available at: https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/articles/cancer-related-fatigue. Accessed July 11, 2017.
28. Hill A, Hughes J. Empowering Cancer Survivors to Become the CEO (Chief Energy Officer) of Everyday Life. 2017.
29. Calvet M, Curran J, Yamada K. Cancer-Related Fatigue. Oncology Section, APTA; 2015:1-3. Available at:
http://oncologypt.org/pdfs/fact-sheets/Cancer-related-Fatigue-rev-4-10-16.pdf. Accessed July 13, 2017
30. Harbourne R, Becker K, Arpin D et al. Improving the motor skill of children with posterior fossa syndrome: a case series. Pediatric Physical Therapy. 2014;26:462-468.
References