Upload
julien-excell
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Peter Athron
David Miller
In collaboration with
Fine Tuning
Expect New Physics at Planck Energy (Mass)
Hierarchy Problem
Higgs mass sensitive to this scale
Supersymmetry (SUSY) removes quadratic dependence
Enormous Fine tuning!
SUSY?
Standard Model (SM) of particle physics
Eliminates fine tuning
Beautiful description of Electromagnetic, Weak and Strong forces
Neglects gravitation, very weak at low energies (large distances)
Little Hierarchy Problem
Constrained Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (CMSSM)
Z boson mass predicted from CMSSM parameters
Fine tuning?
Only low mass SUSY avoids fine tuning
SM masses sensitive to SUSY masses
R. Barbieri & G.F. Giudice, (1988)
Define Tuning
is fine tuned
% change in from 1% change in
Observable
Parameter
Traditional Measure
Limitations of the Traditional Measure
Considers each parameter separately
Fine tuning is about cancellations between parameters . A good fine tuning measure considers all parameters together.
Considers only one observable
Theories may contain tunings in several observables
Global Sensitivity G. W. Anderson & D.J Castano (1995)
Consider:
All points are tuned? All points are special, atypical scenarios?
True tuning must be quantified with a normalised measure
No unnatural cancellation!
parameter space volume restricted by,
Parameter space point,
Unnormalised Tuning:
New Measure
`` ``
Compare dimensionless variations in ALL parameters
With dimensionless variations in ALL observables
parameter space volume restricted by,
Parameter space point,
Unnormalised Tuning:
New Measure
Tuning:
mean value
`` ``
Compare dimensionless variations in ALL parameters
With dimensionless variations in ALL observables
Remove Global Sensitivity
Probability of random point lying in :
Probability of a point lying in a “typical” volume:
New Measure
Define:
We measure the relative improbability!
volume with physical scenarios qualitatively “similar” to point P
Standard Model
Obtain over whole parameter range:
Large numbers of observables and parameters Numerical Approach
Choose a point P in the parameter space. Take random fluctuations about this point. Count how many points are in and Apply tuning measure
Fine Tuning in the CMSSM
Tuning
Tuning in
“Natural” Point 1
“Natural” Point 2
If we normalise with NP1 If we normalise with NP2
Tunings for the points shown in plots are:
Fine Tuning in the SM SUSY
CMSSM appears fine tuned in Little Hierarchy Problem
New measure considers how:all observables restrict space formed by all parameters in comparison to “typical” (global sensitivity)
CMSSM may not be fine tuned
Conclusions
Tuning in
Tuning
m1/2(GeV)
m1/2(GeV)
For our study of tuning in the CMSSM we chose a grid of points:
Plots showing tuning variation in m1/2 were obtained by taking the average tuning for each m1/2 over all m0.
Plots showing tuning variation in m0 were obtained by taking the average tuning for each m0 over all m1/2.
Technical Aside
To reduce statistical errors:
For example . . .
MSUGRA benchmark point SPS1a:
ALL
Supersymmetry The only possible extension to space-time
Unifies gauge couplings
Provides Dark Matter candidates
Leptogenesis in the early universe
Elegant solution to the Hierarchy Problem!
Essential ingredient for M-Theory
Beyond the Standard Model Physics
Technicolor
Large Extra Dimensions
Little Higgs
Twin Higgs
Supersymmetry
Superymmetry Models with extended Higgs sectors NMSSM nMSSM ESSM
Supersymmetry Plus Little Higgs Twin Higgs
Alternative solutions to the Hierarchy Problem Technicolor Large Extra Dimensions Little Higgs Twin Higgs
Need a reliable, quantitative measure of fine tuning to judge the success of these approaches.
Solutions?
Global Sensitivity
Consider:
responds sensitively to
All values of appear equally tuned!
throughout the whole parameter space (globally)
All are atypical?
True tuning must be quantified with a normalised measure
G. W. Anderson & D.J Castano (1995)
Only relative sensitivity between different points indicates atypical values of