1
COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL ANALYTICAL AND MASS SPECTROMETRIC METHODS APPLIED ON POLYESTERS Klara Saller and Clemens Schwarzinger Institute for Chemical Technology of Organic Materials, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria Johannes Kepler University Linz, May 2019 1125,07 1171,08 1193,19 1211,17 1359,24 1427,36 1445,37 1593,32 1193,25 1211,26 1297,30 1427,40 1445,40 1531,41 PS standards 10,850 5,460 2,430 1101 1103 1105 1134 1136 1138 251,097 399,115 485,187 633,207 719,282 867,301 953,370 1101,386 1135,420 1252,477 1335,492 1101,386 1102,395 1103,392 1135,420 1135,926 1136,433 1136,925 Introduction Due to their versatility, polyesters are popular in different industrial applications such as bottles, fibers, and binders. To understand the influences of molecular structures on crucial properties, several analytical methods are available. Besides conventional methods such as gel permeation chromatography (GPC) and quantification of functional groups via titration (acid value, hydroxyl number), more specific analysis such as MALDI-TOF and direct infusion ESI- Orbitrap mass spectrometry (MS) can be applied. Experimental and Results For the comparison of the analytical methods mentioned above, different polyesters (PES) were synthesized using isophthalic acid and neopentyl glycol as monomers (Fig. 1). For carboxyl terminated PES-COOH the acid component was used in excess, PES-OH was synthesized with an excess of neopentyl glycol. After determination of acid and hydroxyl value, the number average molar mass (M n ) was calculated and similar results were obtained for PES-COOH (3 620 g mol -1 ) and PES-OH (3 860 g mol -1 ). Calculation of M n from GPC chromatograms after calibration with polystyrene (PS) standards (Fig. 2) gave significantly lower values of 1 760 and 2 180 g mol -1 , respectively. It can be assumed that the chosen polyesters have stronger interactions to the GPC column compared to PS and thus, results seem to be distorted. Fig. 3 shows the mass spectrum of PES-COOH obtained by direct infusion ESI-Orbitrap MS (negative mode). Resolution and accuracy were high, but only low masses up to 2 500 could be detected. Conclusion Comparing conventional and MS methods for structure elucidation of the chosen polyester system, MALDI-TOF MS seems to provide the most comprehensive information about both molecular mass distribution and functional groups. The combination with GPC fractionation allows optimization of mass resolution and accuracy. Figure 3: Direct infusion ESI-Orbitrap mass spectrum. High resolution and accuracy was obtained (e.g. m/z th = 399,108 vs. m/z pr = 399,115), but only polyesters with n 10 were detected. 10 000 Intensity / a.u. 1 000 4 000 7 000 PES-OH original m/z PES-COOH original fraction of PES-COOH V r = 7,4 mL 1 000 4 000 7 000 10 000 m/z Intensity / a.u. 5 8 9 10 retention volume V r / mL 6 7 1 100 1 200 1 600 1 500 1 400 1 300 m/z PES-OH PES-COOH cyclic PES n = 5 HOOCPESOH n = 5 HOPESOH n = 5 cyclic PES n = 6 HOOCPESOH n = 6 HOPESOH n = 6 HOOCPESCOOH n = 4 HOOCPESCOOH n = 5 HOOCPESCOOH n = 6 cyclic PES n = 5 HOOCPESOH n = 5 cyclic PES n = 6 HOOCPESOH n = 6 Intensity / a.u. 200 800 1 000 1 200 m/z 400 600 1 400 Intensity / a.u. PES-COOH HOOCPESOH n = 1 HOOCPESCOOH n = 1 HOOCPESCOOH n = 4 HOOCPESCOOH n = 9 HOOCCOOH n = 40 Figure 1: Structure of linear polyesters from isophthalic acid and neopentyl glycol. Excess of one component leads to different functionalization on R 1 and R 2 . R 1 R 1 R 2 R 2 Figure 2: GPC chromatograms. Similar mass distributions are obtained for PES COOH and OH compared to PS standards. Figure 4: MALDI-TOF mass spectra show similar mass distribution for the polyesters, here up to m/z = 10000 (top). To optimize resolution and accuracy, fractionation of polyesters via GPC is necessary and successfully executed by direct application of eluent on MALDI target. Figure 5: MALDI-TOF MS detail including assignments. For both polyesters terminating groups could be identified and also cyclization was observed. MALDI-TOF mass spectra are shown in Fig. 4. The regarded m/z region up to 10 000 revealed similar mass distributions of PES-OH and PES-COOH. Terminating groups could be identified and cyclization products were found. Details are shown in Fig. 5. However, mass resolution and accuracy were low compared to other polymers analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS. Thus, smaller m/z regions should be regarded for optimizing the quality of the spectra. This was achieved by fractioning the samples by GPC prior to analysis. For this purpose the eluent was mixed with the matrix solution on-line and directly applied onto the MALDI target via electrospray (Fig. 4). PES-COOH PES-OH z = 2 HOOCPESOH n = 2 HOOCPESCOOH n = 2 z = 1 fraction of PES-COOH V r = 6,8 mL fraction of PES-OH V r = 6,7 mL fraction of PES-OH V r = 7,3 mL

PES COOH - JKU

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    15

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: PES COOH - JKU

COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL ANALYTICAL AND MASS SPECTROMETRIC METHODS APPLIED ON POLYESTERS

Klara Saller and Clemens SchwarzingerInstitute for Chemical Technology of Organic Materials, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria

Johannes Kepler University Linz, May 2019

1125,07

1171,08

1193,19

1211,17

1359,24

1427,36

1445,37

1593,32

1193,25

1211,26

1297,30

1427,401445,40

1531,41

PES COOH

PES OH

PS standards

10,850

5,460

2,430

1101 1103 1105 1134 1136 1138251,097

399,115

485,187 633,207

719,282867,301

953,370 1101,386

1135,420

1252,477

1335,492

1101,386

1102,395

1103,3921135,420

1135,926

1136,433

1136,925

Introduction

Due to their versatility, polyesters are popular in different industrial

applications such as bottles, fibers, and binders. To understand the

influences of molecular structures on crucial properties, several

analytical methods are available. Besides conventional methods

such as gel permeation chromatography (GPC) and quantification of

functional groups via titration (acid value, hydroxyl number), more

specific analysis such as MALDI-TOF and direct infusion ESI-

Orbitrap mass spectrometry (MS) can be applied.

Experimental and Results

For the comparison of the analytical methods mentioned above,

different polyesters (PES) were synthesized using isophthalic acid

and neopentyl glycol as monomers (Fig. 1). For carboxyl terminated

PES-COOH the acid component was used in excess, PES-OH was

synthesized with an excess of neopentyl glycol.

After determination of acid and hydroxyl value, the number

average molar mass (Mn) was calculated and similar results were

obtained for PES-COOH (3 620 g mol-1) and PES-OH (3 860 g mol-1).

Calculation of Mn from GPC chromatograms after calibration with

polystyrene (PS) standards (Fig. 2) gave significantly lower values of

1 760 and 2 180 g mol-1, respectively. It can be assumed that the

chosen polyesters have stronger interactions to the GPC column

compared to PS and thus, results seem to be distorted.

Fig. 3 shows the mass spectrum of PES-COOH obtained by direct

infusion ESI-Orbitrap MS (negative mode). Resolution and accuracy

were high, but only low masses up to 2 500 could be detected.

Conclusion

Comparing conventional and MS methods for structure elucidation of

the chosen polyester system, MALDI-TOF MS seems to provide the

most comprehensive information about both molecular mass

distribution and functional groups. The combination with GPC

fractionation allows optimization of mass resolution and accuracy.

Figure 3: Direct infusion ESI-Orbitrap mass spectrum. High resolution and accuracy was

obtained (e.g. m/zth = 399,108 vs. m/zpr = 399,115), but only polyesters with n ≤ 10 were detected.

10 000

Inte

nsit

y/ a.u

.

1 000 4 000 7 000

PES-OH original

m/z

PES-COOH original

fraction of PES-COOHVr = 7,4 mL

1 000 4 000 7 000 10 000m/z

Inte

nsit

y/ a.u

.

5 8 9 10retention volume Vr / mL

6 7 1 100 1 200 1 6001 5001 4001 300m/z

PES-OH

PES-COOH

cyclic PESn = 5

HOOC–PES–OHn = 5

HO–PES–OHn = 5

cyclic PESn = 6

HOOC–PES–OHn = 6

HO–PES–OHn = 6

HOOC–PES–COOHn = 4

HOOC–PES–COOHn = 5

HOOC–PES–COOHn = 6

cyclic PESn = 5

HOOC–PES–OHn = 5

cyclic PESn = 6

HOOC–PES–OHn = 6

Inte

nsit

y/ a.u

.

200 800 1 000 1 200

m/z400 600 1 400

Inte

nsit

y/ a.u

.

PES-COOH

HO

OC–

PE

S–

OH

n =

1

HO

OC–

PE

S–

CO

OH

n =

1

HOOC–PES–COOHn = 4

HOOC–PES–COOHn = 9

HOOC–COOHn = 40

Figure 1: Structure of linear polyesters from isophthalic acid and neopentyl glycol. Excess of one component

leads to different functionalization on R1 and R2.

R1

R1

R2

R2

Figure 2: GPC chromatograms. Similar mass distributions are

obtained for PES COOH and OH compared to PS standards.

Figure 4: MALDI-TOF mass spectra show similar mass distribution for the polyesters, here

up to m/z = 10 000 (top). To optimize resolution and accuracy, fractionation of polyesters via

GPC is necessary and successfully executed by direct application of eluent on MALDI target.

Figure 5: MALDI-TOF MS detail including assignments. For

both polyesters terminating groups could be identified and also

cyclization was observed.

MALDI-TOF mass spectra are shown in Fig. 4. The regarded m/z

region up to 10 000 revealed similar mass distributions of PES-OH

and PES-COOH. Terminating groups could be identified and

cyclization products were found. Details are shown in Fig. 5.

However, mass resolution and accuracy were low compared to other

polymers analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS. Thus, smaller m/z regions

should be regarded for optimizing the quality of the spectra. This was

achieved by fractioning the samples by GPC prior to analysis. For

this purpose the eluent was mixed with the matrix solution on-line

and directly applied onto the MALDI target via electrospray (Fig. 4).

PES-COOH

PES-OH

z = 2

HO

OC–

PE

S–

OH

n =

2

HO

OC–

PE

S–

CO

OH

n =

2

z = 1

fraction of PES-COOHVr = 6,8 mL

fraction of PES-OHVr = 6,7 mL

fraction of PES-OHVr = 7,3 mL