perpustakaanRunRaRidh digilibRunRaRidh/Developing...perpustakaanRunRaRidh digilibRunRaRidh h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h commit to user ii APPROVAL DEVELOPING INQUIRY MODEL

perpustakaan.uns.ac.id digilib.uns.ac.id

commit to user

DEVELOPING INQUIRY MODEL TO TEACH (A Research and Development Study at the Fifth Semester Students of

UNISKA Kediriin the Academic Year of 2012 / 2013)

As a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirementsfor the Graduate Degree in English Language Education

ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

SEBELAS MARET UNIVERSITY

VELOPING INQUIRY MODEL TO TEACH SOCIOLINGUISTICS (A Research and Development Study at the Fifth Semester Students of

UNISKA Kediriin the Academic Year of 2012 / 2013)

THESIS

Presented As a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements

for the Graduate Degree in English Language Education

By

AYU FATMAWATI S891108022

ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT GRADUATE SCHOOL

SEBELAS MARET UNIVERSITY SURAKARTA

2013

SOCIOLINGUISTICS (A Research and Development Study at the Fifth Semester Students of


commit to user

ii

APPROVAL

DEVELOPING INQUIRY MODEL TO TEACH SOCIOLINGUISTICS (A Research and Development Study at the Fifth Semester Students of UNISKA

Kediriin the Academic Year of 2012 / 2013) By


The thesis has been approved by the Consultants of Graduate School of English Education Department of Sebelas Maret University Surakarta

Surakarta, June 2013

Thesis Consultants:

First Consultant

Dr. Abdul Asib, M.Pd. NIP. 19520307 198003 1 005

Second Consultant

Dr. Ngadiso, M. Pd NIP. 19621231 198803 1 009

The Head of English Education Department

Dr. Abdul Asib, M.Pd NIP. 19520307 198003 1 005


commit to user

iii

LEGALIZATION FROM THE BOARD OF EXAMINERS

DEVELOPING INQUIRY MODEL TO TEACH SOCIOLINGUISTICS (A Research and Development Study at the Fifth Semester Students of UNISKA

Kediri in the Academic Year of 2012 / 2013) By


This Thesis has been examined by the Board of Examiners of Graduate School of English Education Department of Sebelas Maret University Surakarta on the …June 2013

The Board of thesis examiners:

Chairperson Secretary Examiner I Examiner II

Dra. Dewi Rochantiningsih,M.Ed, Ph.D NIP. 19600918 198702 2 001 Dra. Diah Kristina, M.A, Ph.D NIP. 19590505 198601 2 001 Dr. Abdul Asib, M.Pd NIP. 19520307 198003 1 005

Dr. Ngadiso, M. Pd NIP. 19621231 198803 1 009

……………………

………………..…

………………….

………….………

The Director of Graduate School of Sebelas Maret University Surakarta

Prof. Dr. Ir. Ahmad Yunus, M.S. NIP. 19610717 198601 1 001

The Head of Graduate School of English Education Department of Sebelas Maret University

Dr. Abdul Asib, M.Pd. NIP. 19520307 198003 1 005


commit to user

iv

PRONOUNCEMENT

This is to certify that I myself write this thesis entitled “Developing Inquiry

Model to Teach Sociolinguistics (A Research and Development Study at the Fifth

Semester Students of UNISKA Kediri in the Academic Year of 2012 / 2013)”. It

is not plagiarized or made by others. Anything related to other’s work is written in

quotation, the source of which is listed on bibliography. If then this

pronouncement proves incorrect, I am ready to accept any academic punishment,

including the withdrawal or cancellation of my academic degree.


Ayu Fatmawati


commit to user

v

ABSTRACT Ayu Fatmawati. S891108022, 2013: DEVELOPING INQUIRY MODEL TO TEACH SOCIOLINGUISTICS (A RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTAL STUDY AT THE FIFTH SEMESTER STUDENTS OF UNISKA KEDIRI IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2012/2013). Thesis. Surakarta. English Education Department of Graduate School. Sebelas Maret University, 2013. First consultant: Dr. Abdul Asib, M.Pd; Second consultant: Dr. Ngadiso, M.Pd.

This study is aimed at: (1) describing the weaknesses of the existing Sociolinguistics teaching model, (2) developing an inquiry model for teaching Sociolinguistics, and (3) describing the effectiveness of the inquiry model. The result of this study is expected to accomplish the inquiry principles especially for teaching of Sociolinguistics in the university level.

This is a research and development study which was carried out at UNISKA Kediri in the fifth semester of the academic year of 2012/2013. It is oriented on the product development in the form of teaching guideline. The interview was conducted to obtain the qualitative data, and then the data were analyzed descriptively. Meanwhile, observation, questionnaire, and document analysis were conducted to obtain the quantitative data which were then analyzed by using simple statistics formula. Firstly, the findings on the exploration study show that there were weaknesses on the existing Sociolinguistics teaching model, they are: (1) the existing model was less appropriate; (2) the existing model was less effective; (3) the existing model less support the goal of learning; (4) the existing model had less syntax; (5) the existing model was less supported by the environment; and (6) the existing model had less management system.Based on the weaknesses, the researcher proposes a suitable teaching model that is inquiry model.The chosen inquiry model shows that the model can increase the students’ abilities in solving social problems. Then, the researcher developed a prototype of the inquiry model. Before it was tried out in the field, the prototype was validated by an expert. After being tried out, the developed inquiry model is effective and ready to be applied as the Sociolinguistics teaching model in the university level.

The result of the data analysis of the tryout shows some benefits of the developed inquiry model: (1) the developed inquiry model was appropriate enough; (2) the developed inquiry model was effective enough; (3) the developed inquiry model supportedenough the goal of learning; (4) the developed inquiry model had good enough syntax; (5) the developed inquiry model was supported enough by the environment; and (6) the developed inquiry model had good enough management system. Finally, it can be concluded that this developed model is effective to be applied as the Sociolinguistics teaching model since it provides improvement to all of the weaknesses of the existing teaching model found in the exploration study.

Keywords: Inquiry Model; Sociolinguistics; Research and Development


commit to user

vi

MOTTO

No one is busy in this world.

It’s all about priorities.

(WhatsApp)


commit to user

vii

DEDICATION

This thesis is dedicated to my beloved parents and

my younger brother.


commit to user

viii

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Thanks to Allah for having finished this thesis. Then, I would like to

acknowledge my gratitude to both of my consultants, Dr. Abdul Asib, M.Pd. and

Dr. Ngadiso, M.Pd. for the criticism and suggestions in order to make better this

thesis.

I sincerely thank the UNISKA Kediri to allow me doing this research and

the Sociolinguistics lecturer who always helps me during this study. I also thank

to the students of the fifth semester of English department UNISKA Kediri for the

great enthusiasm.

My gratitude to The Director of Graduate School of Sebelas Maret

University, Prof. Dr. Ir. Ahmad Yunus, M.S. without his approval andpermission

this study will never exist. My sincere gratitude is also extended to both of my

exemainers, Dra. Dewi Rochsantiningsih, M.Ed, Ph.D. and Dra. Diah Kristina,

M.A, Ph.D. for any addition and suggestion in my thesis. I also gratefully thank

toall of my lecturers for all of the knowledge shared. To my parents, my brother,

and my friends thank you for every support you give.

Finally, my gratfully thank to those who have supported me during

thecompletion of this thesis that cannot be mentioned all.


Ayu Fatmawati


commit to user

ix

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

COVER ........................................................................................................... i APPROVAL OF CONSULTANTS ................................................................. ii THE APPROVAL OF EXAMINERS .............................................................. iii PRONOUNCEMENT ...................................................................................... iv ABSTRACT .................................................................................................... v MOTTO .......................................................................................................... vi DEDICATION ................................................................................................ vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ............................................................................... viii TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................. ix LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................... xii LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................... xii LIST OF APPENDICES .................................................................................. xiv

CHAPTER I : INTRODUCTION A. Background of the Study ......................................... 1 B. Problems Identification ............................................ 4 C. Problems Limitation ................................................ 5 D. Problems Formulation.............................................. 5 E. Objectives of the Study ............................................ 5 F. Specification of Expected Product ........................... 6 G. Assumption and Limitation of the Development ...... 6

CHAPTER II: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE A. The Nature of Sociolinguistics .................................... 8

1. Definition of Sociolinguistics .............................. 8 2. Problems in Sociolinguistics ................................ 10 3. The Use of Sociolinguistics in

Language Teaching ............................................. 12 4. Sociolinguistics at UNISKA ................................ 12

B. Teaching Model ......................................................... 14 1. Definition of Teaching Model ............................. 14 2. Kinds of Teaching Model ................................... 15 3. Instructional Design Model ................................. 17

C. Contextual Teaching and Learning 1. Definition of CTL ............................................... 19 2. The Characteristics of CTL ................................. 22 3. Principles of CTL ................................................ 24

D. Inquiry Model ............................................................ 27 1. Definition of Inquiry Model ................................ 27 2. Types of Inquiry Model ....................................... 29 3. The Stages of Inquiry Model ............................... 32 4. The General Requirements on Applying Inquiry Model ..................................................... 34 5. Teachers’ Role .................................................... 36


commit to user

x

D. Relevant Study ........................................................ 37 E. Rationale ................................................................. 39

CHAPTER III: RESEARCH DESIGN A. Research and Development ...................................... 43 B. Stage 1: Need Analysis ............................................ 46 1. Objectives of the Research ................................... 46 2. Time and Place of Research ................................. 47 3. Data Collection Instruments ................................. 47

4. Data Analysis Techniques .................................... 48 C Stage 2: Product Arrangement ................................. 49

1. Objectives of the Research ................................. 50 2. Time and Place of Research ............................... 50 3. Data Collection Instruments ............................... 51 4. Data Analysis Techniques .................................. 51

D Stage 3: Validation and Tryout ................................ 52 1. Objectives of the Research ................................... 53 2. Time and Place of Research ................................. 53 3. Data Collection Instruments ................................. 53 4. Data Analysis Techniques .................................... 54

CHAPTER IV: THE EXPLORATION STAGE A. Research Findings ................................................... 56

1. The Analysis of the Questionnaire ..................... 56 2. The Analysis of the Interview ............................ 58 3. The Analysis of the Observation ........................ 60 4. The Document Analysis .................................... 63

B. Conclusion ............................................................. 64 C. Prototype Design ..................................................... 69 D. Expert Validation .................................................... 74

CHAPTER V: MODEL DEVELOPMENT AND MODEL TRY OUT A. Description of Developed Model

Implementation ....................................................... 77 B. Model Change ......................................................... 80

1. The First Model Try Out ................................... 80 a) The Data Presentation of the Interview .......... 80 b) The Data Presentation of the Observation ...... 83 c) Conclusion ..................................................... 85

2. The Second Model Try Out ............................... 85 a) The Data Presentation of the Interview .......... 85 b) The Data Presentation of the Observation ...... 88 c) Conclusion ..................................................... 90

3. The Third Model Try Out .................................. 90 a) The Data Presentation of the Interview .......... 90 b) The Data Presentation of the Observation ...... 93 c) The Data Presentation of the Questionnaire .... 95 d) Conclusion ..................................................... 97


commit to user

xi

C. The Weaknesses and Benefits of the Model ............. 99 1. The Weaknesses ................................................ 99 2. The Benefits ...................................................... 100

CHAPTER VI: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

A. Conclusion .............................................................. 102 B. Implications ............................................................ 104 C. Sugesstions ............................................................. 106

BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................ 107

APPENDICES ................................................................................ 110


commit to user

xii

LIST OF TABLE

Table 2.1 Social Models ............................................................................ 15 Table 2.2 Information-Processing Model ................................................... 16 Table 2.3 Personal Models ......................................................................... 16 Table 2.4 Behavioral Models ..................................................................... 17 Table 2.5 Stages of Inquiry Model ............................................................. 33 Table 4.1 The Questionnaire Result ........................................................... 57 Table 4.2 The Observation Result .............................................................. 61 Table 4.3 The Document Analysis Result .................................................. 63 Table 4.4 The Teacher and Students’ Activities ......................................... 73 Table 4.5 Expert Validation Result ............................................................ 75 Table 5.1 The Interview Result of the Inquiry Model ................................. 82 Table 5.2 The Observation Result of the Inquiry Model ............................. 83 Table 5.3 The Interview Result of the Inquiry Model ................................. 87 Table 5.4 The Observation Result of the Inquiry Model ............................. 88 Table 5.5 The Interview Result of the Inquiry Model ................................. 92 Table 5.6 The Observation Result of the Inquiry Model ............................. 93 Table 5.7 The Questionnaire Result of the Inquiry Model .......................... 95 Table 5.8 The Developed Inquiry Model .................................................... 99 Table 5.9 The Weaknesses of Developed Model ........................................ 99 Table 5.10 The Benefit of Developed Model .............................................. 100


commit to user

xiii

LIST OF FIGURE

Figure 2.1 Dick and Carey Model .............................................................. 18 Figure 2.2 Rationale ................................................................................... 42 Figure 3.1 Development Procedure ............................................................ 45 Figure 4.1 The Questionnaire Result .......................................................... 57 Figure 4.2 The Observation Result ............................................................. 61 Figure 4.3 The Document Analysis Result ................................................. 63 Figure 4.4 The Stages of Inquiry Model by Eggen and Kauchak ................ 68 Figure 4.5 The Developed Inquiry Model .................................................. 70 Figure 5.1 Description of Developed Model Implementation ..................... 79 Figure 5.2 The Diagram of Observation Result of the Inquiry Model ......... 83 Figure 5.3 The Diagram of Observation Result of the Inquiry Model ......... 88 Figure 5.4 The Diagram of Observation Result of the Inquiry Model ......... 93 Figure 5.5 The Diagram of Questionnaire Result of the Inquiry Model ...... 95


commit to user

xiv

LIST OF APPENDICES

1. Time Setting of the Study ...................................................................... 111 2. Instruments ........................................................................................... 112 3. Lembar Evaluasi (Expert Judgement) .................................................... 125 4. Catatan Hasil Wawancara ..................................................................... 127 5. Catatan Hasil Observasi ........................................................................ 144 6. Tally Angket ......................................................................................... 152 7. Letter of Permission .............................................................................. 153 8. Final Product ........................................................................................ 154

Documents

perpustakaanRunRaRidh digilibRunRaRidh/Developing...perpustakaanRunRaRidh digilibRunRaRidh h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h commit to user ii APPROVAL DEVELOPING INQUIRY MODEL