4
Performance of Fox 10 Vs Staph. aureus DHM (Sydney), Gribbles (Melb.) Used Fox 10 since Jan 05 (> 1000) Borderline strains tested for mecA gene Results: 100% agreement between CDS test

Performance of Fox 10 Vs Staph. aureus DHM (Sydney), Gribbles (Melb.)

  • Upload
    rowena

  • View
    24

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Performance of Fox 10 Vs Staph. aureus DHM (Sydney), Gribbles (Melb.) Used Fox 10 since Jan 05 (> 1000) Borderline strains tested for mec A gene Results: 100% agreement between CDS test and mec A gene detection. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Performance of Fox 10 Vs  Staph. aureus DHM (Sydney), Gribbles (Melb.)

Performance ofFox 10 Vs Staph. aureus

DHM (Sydney), Gribbles (Melb.) Used Fox 10 since Jan 05 (> 1000)Borderline strains tested for mecA gene

Results:100% agreement between CDS test and mecA gene detection

Page 2: Performance of Fox 10 Vs  Staph. aureus DHM (Sydney), Gribbles (Melb.)

Penicillinase producing S. aureus, resistant to penicillin, susceptible to methicillin/cefoxitin, erythromycin and gentamicin.

Page 3: Performance of Fox 10 Vs  Staph. aureus DHM (Sydney), Gribbles (Melb.)

Non multiple resistant (NMR) MRSA, resistant to penicillin, methicillin/cefoxitin, erythromycin, susceptible to co-trimoxazole.

Page 4: Performance of Fox 10 Vs  Staph. aureus DHM (Sydney), Gribbles (Melb.)

Penicillinase-negative non multiple resistant (NMR) MRSA on Sensitest agar, susceptible to erythromycin and tetracycline, resistant to methicillin/cefoxitin, and appears susceptible to penicillin and oxacillin. Report as R/ Pen, Met.