35
Perceptual Weighting Strategies in Normal Hearing and Hearing Impaired Children and Adults Andrea Pittman, Ph.D. Patricia Stelmachowicz, Ph.D. Dawna Lewis, M.A. Brenda Hoover, M.A. Boys Town National Research Hospital Funded by a grant from NIH

Perceptual Weighting Strategies in Normal Hearing and Hearing Impaired Children and Adults Andrea Pittman, Ph.D. Patricia Stelmachowicz, Ph.D. Dawna Lewis,

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Perceptual Weighting Strategies in Normal Hearing

and Hearing Impaired Children and Adults

Andrea Pittman, Ph.D.

Patricia Stelmachowicz, Ph.D.

Dawna Lewis, M.A.

Brenda Hoover, M.A.

Boys Town National Research Hospital

Funded by a grant from NIH

How do hearing-impaired children learn to perceive speech?

• Hearing impaired: receive reduced speech signal

Hearing-Impaired Children

Hearing

Hearing-Impaired Adults

Normal-Hearing Children

Normal-Hearing Adults

Experience

• Children: less experience perceiving speech

How do hearing-impaired children learn to perceive speech?

Subjects

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000

Frequency (Hz)

He

arin

g L

eve

l (d

B H

L)

Normal Hearing10 Adults (mean = 28 yrs, 20-44)

20 Children (mean = 6:8 yrs, 5-7)

Hearing Impaired10 Adults (mean = 59 yrs, 49-66)

10 Children (mean = 7:8 yrs, 5-10)

Subjects

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000

Frequency (Hz)

He

arin

g L

eve

l (d

B H

L)

Normal Hearing10 Adults (mean = 28 yrs, 20-44)

20 Children (mean = 6:8 yrs, 5-7)

Hearing Impaired10 Adults (mean = 59 yrs, 49-66)

10 Children (mean = 7:8 yrs, 5-10)

StimuliSack Sock

Shack Shock

4 words – CVC– 2 vowels – 2 fricatives

StimuliSack Sock

Shack Shock

2 conditions – w/ transition– w/o transition

StimuliSack Sock

Shack Shock

2 conditions – w/ transition– w/o transition

Stimuli

w/o transition

w/ transition 2 conditions – w/ transition– w/o transition

Stimuli 2 segments

– fricative – vowel

Sack Sock

Shack Shock

Stimuli 2 segments

– fricative – vowel

Sack Sock

Shack Shock

Stimuli

-20

0

20

40

60

80

500 2000 8000

vowel

fricative

Frequency (Hz)

Lev

el (

dB

SP

L)

5 levels– 5 to 12 dB steps– 20 to 48 dB range

Stimuli

-20

0

20

40

60

80

500 2000 8000

vowel

fricative

Frequency (Hz)

Lev

el (

dB

SP

L)

5 levels– 5 to 12 dB steps– 20 to 48 dB range

Stimuli

-20

0

20

40

60

80

500 2000 8000

Frequency (Hz)

Lev

el (

dB

SP

L)

5 levels– 5 to 12 dB steps– 20 to 48 dB range

Stimuli

-20

0

20

40

60

80

500 2000 8000

Frequency (Hz)

Lev

el (

dB

SP

L)

5 levels– 5 to 12 dB steps– 20 to 48 dB range

Stimuli

-20

0

20

40

60

80

500 2000 8000

Frequency (Hz)

Lev

el (

dB

SP

L)

5 levels– 5 to 12 dB steps– 20 to 48 dB range

Stimuli

-20

0

20

40

60

80

500 2000 8000

Frequency (Hz)

Lev

el (

dB

SP

L)

5 levels– 5 to 12 dB steps– 20 to 48 dB range

Stimuli

-20

0

20

40

60

80

500 2000 8000

Frequency (Hz)

Lev

el (

dB

SP

L)

5 levels– 5 to 12 dB steps– 20 to 48 dB range

Stimuli

-20

0

20

40

60

80

500 2000 8000

Frequency (Hz)

Lev

el (

dB

SP

L)

5 levels– 5 to 12 dB steps– 20 to 48 dB range

Stimuli

-20

0

20

40

60

80

500 2000 8000

Frequency (Hz)

Lev

el (

dB

SP

L)

5 levels– 5 to 12 dB steps– 20 to 48 dB range

Stimuli

-20

0

20

40

60

80

500 2000 8000

vowel

fricative

Frequency (Hz)

Lev

el (

dB

SP

L)

5 levels– 5 to 12 dB steps– 20 to 48 dB range

-20

0

20

40

60

80

500 2000 8000

Frequency (Hz)

Leve

l (dB

SP

L)

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Pe

rfo

rma

nce

Short-Term Audibility

Short-Term Audibility

-20

0

20

40

60

80

500 2000 8000

Frequency (Hz)

Leve

l (dB

SP

L)

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Pe

rfo

rma

nce

Short-Term Audibility

Short-Term Audibility

-20

0

20

40

60

80

500 2000 8000

Frequency (Hz)

Leve

l (dB

SP

L)

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Pe

rfo

rma

nce

Short-Term Audibility

Short-Term Audibility

-20

0

20

40

60

80

500 2000 8000

Frequency (Hz)

Leve

l (dB

SP

L)

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Pe

rfo

rma

nce

Short-Term Audibility

Short-Term Audibility

-20

0

20

40

60

80

500 2000 8000

Frequency (Hz)

Leve

l (dB

SP

L)

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Pe

rfo

rma

nce

Short-Term Audibility

Short-Term Audibility

-20

0

20

40

60

80

500 2000 8000

Frequency (Hz)

Leve

l (dB

SP

L)

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Pe

rfo

rma

nce

Short-Term Audibility

Short-Term Audibility

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Short-Term Audibility

Per

form

ance

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Short-Term Audibility

Per

form

ance

Results

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Normal-Hearing Adults

Short-Term Audibility

Pe

rfo

rma

nce

w/ transition

w/o transition

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Normal-Hearing Adults

Short-Term Audibility

Pe

rfo

rma

nce

w/ transition

w/o transition

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Hearing-Impaired Children

Short-Term Audibility

Pe

rfo

rma

nce

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Hearing-Impaired Adults

Short-Term Audibility

Pe

rfo

rma

nce

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Normal-Hearing Children

Short-Term Audibility

Pe

rfo

rma

nce

w/ transition

w/o transition

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Normal-Hearing Adults

Short-Term Audibility

Pe

rfo

rma

nce

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Hearing-Impaired Children

Short-Term Audibility

Pe

rfo

rma

nce

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Hearing-Impaired Adults

Short-Term Audibility

Pe

rfo

rma

nce

w/ transition

w/o transition

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Normal-Hearing Adults

Short-Term Audibility

Pe

rfo

rma

nce

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Normal-Hearing Children

Short-Term Audibility

Pe

rfo

rma

nce

Conclusions• Experience

- Overall performance and use of the transition increased with age

• Hearing - HI adults showed significantly poorer

performance when the transition was removed Suggests that the transition was more important to perception in this group than in NH listeners

- HI children showed no difference in performance for words with and without a transition