Perception of the Business Administration Students on Cybercrime

7/27/2019 Perception of the Business Administration Students on Cybercrime

1/20


2/20

Republic Act 10715, or also known as theCybercrime prevention act of 2012 was signedinto law by incumbent Philippine president,Benigno C. Aquino on September 12, 2012 and is

to take effect on October 3, 2012.

Sections 4(c)(1-4) and 5 of RA 10175 violate theconstitutional right to freedom of speech, of

expression and of the press enshrined in ArticleIII, Section 4 of the Constitution, as said sectionsare vague and overbroad.


3/20

On October 9, 2012 the supreme court of thePhilippines issued a 120-dayrestraining order, stopping theimplementation of the Act. On 5 February

2013, The Supreme Court extended thetemporary restraining order on the law, "untilfurther orders from the court."


4/20

This study intends to investigate the Perception of the BusinessAdministration Students on Cybercrime Law.

Specifically, this study will seek to answer the followingquestions:

1. What is the demographic profile of the BusinessAdministration Students of UE, Manila, in terms of:

1.1 Age 1.2 Gender 2. How does it affect the following:

2.1 Individual 2.2 Society

3. What are the Advantages of the Cybercrime Law? The

disadvantages? 4. What factors or reasons lead to the negative reaction from the

public to this act?


5/20

The researchers also believed that thefindings of the study would be beneficial tothe following:

1. Students

2. Family

3. Community


6/20

Space Transition Theory from the book Crimesof the Internet (Jaishankar 2008).

Copyright 2007 International Journal of Cyber Criminology (IJCC) ISSN:0974 2891Vol 1 (2): 79

http://libguides.usc.edu/content.php?pid=83009&sid=618409

Social cognitive theory of Albert Bandura Bandura, Albert; Ross, D.; Ross, S. (1961). "Transmission of

aggression through imitation of aggressive models".Journal ofAbnormal and Social Psychology63: 575582. http://www.actforyouth.net/resources/rf/rf_stages_0504.cfm
http://libguides.usc.edu/content.php?pid=83009&sid=618409http://libguides.usc.edu/content.php?pid=83009&sid=618409


7/20

Pi Yong, Comparative Research on Convention onCybercrime and Chinese Relevant Legislation, 2012

http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/economiccrime/cybercrime/documents/countryprofiles/567%20china-d-Comparative%20Research_ed1a.PDF

Kristin M. Finklea, Cybercrime: Conceptual Issues for

Congress and U.S. Law Enforcement, 2013, http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42547.pdf AadvanMoorsel, Research in the Centre for Cybercrime and

Computer Security, 2010, http://cccs.ncl.ac.uk/sites/default/files/LaunchEvent-

AadvanMoorsel.pdf
http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/economiccrime/cybercrime/documents/countryprofiles/567%20china-d-Comparative%20Research_ed1a.PDFhttp://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/economiccrime/cybercrime/documents/countryprofiles/567%20china-d-Comparative%20Research_ed1a.PDFhttp://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/economiccrime/cybercrime/documents/countryprofiles/567%20china-d-Comparative%20Research_ed1a.PDFhttp://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42547.pdfhttp://cccs.ncl.ac.uk/sites/default/files/LaunchEvent-AadvanMoorsel.pdfhttp://cccs.ncl.ac.uk/sites/default/files/LaunchEvent-AadvanMoorsel.pdfhttp://cccs.ncl.ac.uk/sites/default/files/LaunchEvent-AadvanMoorsel.pdfhttp://cccs.ncl.ac.uk/sites/default/files/LaunchEvent-AadvanMoorsel.pdfhttp://cccs.ncl.ac.uk/sites/default/files/LaunchEvent-AadvanMoorsel.pdfhttp://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42547.pdfhttp://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/economiccrime/cybercrime/documents/countryprofiles/567%20china-d-Comparative%20Research_ed1a.PDFhttp://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/economiccrime/cybercrime/documents/countryprofiles/567%20china-d-Comparative%20Research_ed1a.PDFhttp://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/economiccrime/cybercrime/documents/countryprofiles/567%20china-d-Comparative%20Research_ed1a.PDFhttp://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/economiccrime/cybercrime/documents/countryprofiles/567%20china-d-Comparative%20Research_ed1a.PDFhttp://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/economiccrime/cybercrime/documents/countryprofiles/567%20china-d-Comparative%20Research_ed1a.PDFhttp://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/economiccrime/cybercrime/documents/countryprofiles/567%20china-d-Comparative%20Research_ed1a.PDF


8/20

http://www.interaksyon.com/infotech/opinion-beware-the-cybercrime-laws-section-19-the-takedown-clause

Atty. Sta. Maria

http://ebinfoshop.surestepintegral.com/2012/10/10/an-unconstitutional-law-a-

discourse-on-the-cybercrime-law/
http://www.interaksyon.com/infotech/opinion-beware-the-cybercrime-laws-section-19-the-takedown-clausehttp://www.interaksyon.com/infotech/opinion-beware-the-cybercrime-laws-section-19-the-takedown-clausehttp://www.interaksyon.com/infotech/opinion-beware-the-cybercrime-laws-section-19-the-takedown-clausehttp://ebinfoshop.surestepintegral.com/2012/10/10/an-unconstitutional-law-a-discourse-on-the-cybercrime-law/http://ebinfoshop.surestepintegral.com/2012/10/10/an-unconstitutional-law-a-discourse-on-the-cybercrime-law/http://ebinfoshop.surestepintegral.com/2012/10/10/an-unconstitutional-law-a-discourse-on-the-cybercrime-law/http://getrealphilippines.com/blog/2012/06/philippine-congress-mints-new-anti-cybercrime-and-anti-slander-laws/http://ebinfoshop.surestepintegral.com/2012/10/10/an-unconstitutional-law-a-discourse-on-the-cybercrime-law/http://ebinfoshop.surestepintegral.com/2012/10/10/an-unconstitutional-law-a-discourse-on-the-cybercrime-law/http://ebinfoshop.surestepintegral.com/2012/10/10/an-unconstitutional-law-a-discourse-on-the-cybercrime-law/http://ebinfoshop.surestepintegral.com/2012/10/10/an-unconstitutional-law-a-discourse-on-the-cybercrime-law/http://ebinfoshop.surestepintegral.com/2012/10/10/an-unconstitutional-law-a-discourse-on-the-cybercrime-law/http://ebinfoshop.surestepintegral.com/2012/10/10/an-unconstitutional-law-a-discourse-on-the-cybercrime-law/http://ebinfoshop.surestepintegral.com/2012/10/10/an-unconstitutional-law-a-discourse-on-the-cybercrime-law/http://ebinfoshop.surestepintegral.com/2012/10/10/an-unconstitutional-law-a-discourse-on-the-cybercrime-law/http://ebinfoshop.surestepintegral.com/2012/10/10/an-unconstitutional-law-a-discourse-on-the-cybercrime-law/http://ebinfoshop.surestepintegral.com/2012/10/10/an-unconstitutional-law-a-discourse-on-the-cybercrime-law/http://ebinfoshop.surestepintegral.com/2012/10/10/an-unconstitutional-law-a-discourse-on-the-cybercrime-law/http://ebinfoshop.surestepintegral.com/2012/10/10/an-unconstitutional-law-a-discourse-on-the-cybercrime-law/http://ebinfoshop.surestepintegral.com/2012/10/10/an-unconstitutional-law-a-discourse-on-the-cybercrime-law/http://ebinfoshop.surestepintegral.com/2012/10/10/an-unconstitutional-law-a-discourse-on-the-cybercrime-law/http://ebinfoshop.surestepintegral.com/2012/10/10/an-unconstitutional-law-a-discourse-on-the-cybercrime-law/http://ebinfoshop.surestepintegral.com/2012/10/10/an-unconstitutional-law-a-discourse-on-the-cybercrime-law/http://ebinfoshop.surestepintegral.com/2012/10/10/an-unconstitutional-law-a-discourse-on-the-cybercrime-law/http://ebinfoshop.surestepintegral.com/2012/10/10/an-unconstitutional-law-a-discourse-on-the-cybercrime-law/http://ebinfoshop.surestepintegral.com/2012/10/10/an-unconstitutional-law-a-discourse-on-the-cybercrime-law/http://www.interaksyon.com/infotech/opinion-beware-the-cybercrime-laws-section-19-the-takedown-clausehttp://www.interaksyon.com/infotech/opinion-beware-the-cybercrime-laws-section-19-the-takedown-clausehttp://www.interaksyon.com/infotech/opinion-beware-the-cybercrime-laws-section-19-the-takedown-clausehttp://www.interaksyon.com/infotech/opinion-beware-the-cybercrime-laws-section-19-the-takedown-clausehttp://www.interaksyon.com/infotech/opinion-beware-the-cybercrime-laws-section-19-the-takedown-clausehttp://www.interaksyon.com/infotech/opinion-beware-the-cybercrime-laws-section-19-the-takedown-clausehttp://www.interaksyon.com/infotech/opinion-beware-the-cybercrime-laws-section-19-the-takedown-clausehttp://www.interaksyon.com/infotech/opinion-beware-the-cybercrime-laws-section-19-the-takedown-clausehttp://www.interaksyon.com/infotech/opinion-beware-the-cybercrime-laws-section-19-the-takedown-clausehttp://www.interaksyon.com/infotech/opinion-beware-the-cybercrime-laws-section-19-the-takedown-clausehttp://www.interaksyon.com/infotech/opinion-beware-the-cybercrime-laws-section-19-the-takedown-clausehttp://www.interaksyon.com/infotech/opinion-beware-the-cybercrime-laws-section-19-the-takedown-clausehttp://www.interaksyon.com/infotech/opinion-beware-the-cybercrime-laws-section-19-the-takedown-clausehttp://www.interaksyon.com/infotech/opinion-beware-the-cybercrime-laws-section-19-the-takedown-clausehttp://www.interaksyon.com/infotech/opinion-beware-the-cybercrime-laws-section-19-the-takedown-clausehttp://www.interaksyon.com/infotech/opinion-beware-the-cybercrime-laws-section-19-the-takedown-clausehttp://www.interaksyon.com/infotech/opinion-beware-the-cybercrime-laws-section-19-the-takedown-clausehttp://www.interaksyon.com/infotech/opinion-beware-the-cybercrime-laws-section-19-the-takedown-clausehttp://www.interaksyon.com/infotech/opinion-beware-the-cybercrime-laws-section-19-the-takedown-clausehttp://www.interaksyon.com/infotech/opinion-beware-the-cybercrime-laws-section-19-the-takedown-clause


9/20

PROFILE OF REPONDENTS

Gender

Age

Effects of the Cybercrime Law tothe Students

Advantages and Disadvantages of

Cybercrime Law

INPUT

Survey

Statistical Framework

Interpretation of Data

PROCESSProper guidance and

orientation on the use

of the internet

For safety and for

better understanding

on how to avoid

cybercrimes.

OUTPUT


10/20

The descriptive method was used in thisresearch, which was deemed appropriatedesign as it answered the problems posed bythe researchers.

A total of twenty respondents including tenmale and ten female students.


11/20

Before the actual data collection theresearcher sought the permission of DRA.Lynn De Claro. After seeking approval,distributions were made. The researcher

consumed two days in administrating andretrieving the data gathering tool. After thedata collection phase, summarization,counting and tabulating of information tookplace.


12/20

Percentage (%) = (F/N) x 100 Where: % = Frequency percentage distribution

SF or F = frequency (number of responses)

N = total number of student respondents


13/20

Table 1 FREQUENCY OF AGES OF RESPONDENTS

Age Frequency Percentage

16 3 15%

17 6 30%

18 and above 11 55% TOTAL 20 100%


14/20

Table 2 FREQUENCY OF GENDER OF RESPONDENTS

Gender Frequency Percentage

Male 10 50%

Female 10 50%

TOTAL 20 100%


15/20

1. The profile of the 50 College Students ofthe University respondents is as follows:

1.1 According to age, Majority (50%) of themwere 18 years old and above, 30% were 17years old, and the rest (15%) were 15 yearsold.

1.2 According to gender, about half were (10)female and 10 were male.


16/20

2. The law affects:

2.1 Individual

2.2 Society


17/20

3. Advantages

1.Business on the internet are protected withthis law.2. Cyber Sex and Cyber Bullying is now acrime and punishable.3. Tech knowledge for government will be lift

up to combat cyber crimes such as hackingand theft.


18/20

3. Disadvantages 1. freedom of speech

2. intrusion of privacy

3. liking, twweting, sharing or reposting arelibelous

4. One main factor that leads to the negativereaction to the public is that we focus our

research on students aged 15 and abovewhich are mostly youths that uses socialmedia.


19/20

The respondents perceived that cybercrime

law will be helpful to them but at the sametime breaks some rules especially on thefreedom of expression which they arebelieved to be practiced.


20/20

Students should know their limitation on howand when to post things on the social media.They should know what is the extent of theirprivilege in expressing their thoughts.

Cybercrime law may not be fullyunderstandable. So if the government is

eager to pursue it, they should also educatethe youth abouth the provisions of the law.

Documents

Perception of the Business Administration Students on Cybercrime