PEO - Outsourcing Whitepaper

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 PEO - Outsourcing Whitepaper

    1/19

    1

    How Small and Medium Enterprises Benefit From

    Human Resource Outsourcing

    White Paper

    You Can Make the Most of Your PEO-SME Partnership If YouHave a Third Party to Monitor, Monetize and Safeguard Your

    Business Interests

  • 7/30/2019 PEO - Outsourcing Whitepaper

    2/19

    2

    Executive Summary

    In today's tough business environment, dynamic HR systems demand flexible workforce

    arrangements and optimum utilization of available resources. Business imperatives also

    demand cost competencies and focusing management bandwidth on core processes that

    leaves outsourcing as the tool of choice for small and medium enterprises (SMEs).

    Since small and medium enterprises (SMEs) often lack

    the internal resources to develop and deliver full scale

    HR services, they are increasingly outsourcing this

    function to professional employer organizations (PEOs).

    Concerns however remain about the risks involved with

    market governance and a PEOs ability to ensure a

    consistent service quality for an SME. This is where the role of third party brokers such

    as NetPEO (www.netpeo.com) and national memebership association like NAPEO

    (http://www.napeo.org/) come into focus.

    Since, the decision to use a PEO is often a "make or buy" decision that can potentially

    impact both the cost and the quality of an SME's human resources,1

    large consultants

    such as NetPEO can provide advice and professional expertise to quickly bolster a client's

    organization through a strong network of PEOs.

    All this and more is exhaustively covered and referenced in this white paper. At the end

    of this report, you will also find a list of additional resources that you can consult for an

    in-depth understanding of this market.

    1 Walker, G. & Weber, D. (1984). A transaction cost approach to make or buy decisions. AdministrativeScience Quarterly, 29, 373-391

    PEO: A Win-Win

    Proposition

    For Employees: Benefittbetter benefits and a safe

    workplaceFor SMEs: Maximum

    utilization of theirworkforce, reduced

    workforce, legal hassles

    and cost savings

    http://www.netpeo.com/http://www.napeo.org/http://www.napeo.org/http://www.netpeo.com/
  • 7/30/2019 PEO - Outsourcing Whitepaper

    3/19

    3

    Table of Contents

    How Does an SME Benefit from a PEO.......................................................................... 4

    How the Integrative Model Works .................................................................................. 6

    The Cost Factor ................................................................................................................. 7

    Business Conditions That Justify the Use of a PEO ...................................................... 7

    The Risks Involved in Selecting an Appropriate PEO Vendor .................................... 8

    The Importance of Third Party Brokers ...................................................................... 11

    SME Outcomes and Client Receptivity......................................................................... 15

  • 7/30/2019 PEO - Outsourcing Whitepaper

    4/19

    4

    efore we can begin to appreciate the critical role that NetPEO renders in

    strengthening SME-PEO partnerships, its important to first comprehend the

    processes by which PEO utilization affects SME outcomes.

    How Does an SME Benefit from a PEO

    How an organization manages its human resources is increasingly seen as a source of

    sustainable competitive advantage.2

    Due to economics of scale, SMEs often face an

    uphill task in developing an HR system thats

    both efficient and cost-effective.3.

    As a result, an increasing number of SMEs are

    now outsourcing these functions to PEOs.4

    Although a recent development, it is estimated

    that PEOs currently provide HR services to three

    million employees and this trend is predicted to

    continue to grow by 30% per annum.5

    As such, the PEO have become indispensable for

    rendering a broad array of HR services, as well as

    2Huselid, M.A., Jackson, S.E., & Schuler, R.S. (1997). Technical and strategic human resourcemanagement effectiveness determinants of firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 171-188; Becket, B.E. & Gerhart, B. (1996). The impact of human resource management on organizational

    performance: Progress and prospects. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 779-801; Welbourne, T.A. &Cyr, L.A. (1999). The human resource executive effect in initial public offering firms. Academy ofManagement Journal, 42, 616-6323Sexton, D.L., Upton, N.B., Wacholtz, L.E., & McDougall, P.P. (1997). Learning needs of growth-orientedentrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 1-8; Baron, J.N. & Kreps, D.M. (1999). Strategic humanresources. New York: John Wiley & Sons4Cook, M.F. (1999). Outsourcing human resource functions. American Management Association, New

    York.5 Hirschman, C. (1997). All aboard: The boom in employee leasing may bring good career opportunities forHR professionals. HR Magazine, 42, 80-86

    BWhat Can a PEO Do for You?

    PEOs offer businesses a widevariety of services--includingpayroll management, employee

    benefit design and administration,tax filing and administration andcompliance with state and federalworkplace legislation. PEOs alsotake responsibility for developing

    and administering lawfulemployment policies and

    procedures; employee recruitmentand disciplinary actions;

    recordkeeping; andunemployment, disability andworkers' compensation claims

    and administration.

  • 7/30/2019 PEO - Outsourcing Whitepaper

    5/19

    5

    assuming the liabilities associated with being a co-employer with the SME6. Potential

    advantages to the SME from this relationship are also fairly obvious: Greater economies

    of scale and an ability to negotiate better benefit programs, which imply substantial

    savings for the SME, besides an efficient access to HR expertise that provide mechanisms

    to improve the quality ofan SMEs HR programs and outcomes.7

    Since, individual SMEs would have little leverage when negotiating rates for health or

    workers compensation or insurance, PEOs by virtue of representing several thousand

    SMEs are often able to negotiate more

    favorable rates from insurance

    providers.8 Further, because workers

    compensation programs are experience

    rated, a PEO are often able to obtain

    lower rates through safety programs that

    can reduce workplace accidents.9

    In addition, the partnership also results

    in substantial time saving. In many

    SMEs without a PEO, HR activities are often entrusted to the general manager who

    should ideally be involved in activities more directly related to revenue generation.10

    . By

    6

    Baron, J.N. & Kreps, D.M. (1999). Strategic human resources. New York: John Wiley & Sons7Klaas, B.S., McClendon, J., & Gainey, T. (1999). HR outsourcing and its impact: The role of transactioncosts. Personnel Psychology, 52, 113-1368NAPEO. (1993). The business of employee leasing, Alexandria, VA: NAPEO.Nooteboom, B., Berger, H., & Noorderhaven, N.G. (1997). Effects of trust and governance on relationalrisk. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 308-338.9Cook, M.F. (1999). Outsourcing human resource functions. American Management Association, NewYork10Holoviak, J.J. & DeCenzo, D.A. (1982). Effective employee relations: An aid in small business's strugglefor survival. American Journal of Small Business, 6, 49-54; Hannon, M.T., Burton, M.D., & Baron, J.N.

    How Big Is The Industry?

    According to the SBA, PEOs control a 2%market share of the payrolls of small to

    medium-size companies (those with fewerthan 100 employees). The market is

    projected to grow at 30% per annum.In 1997, 1000 PEOs accounted for an

    estimated 2 million to 3 million employees,up from only 10,000 in 1984. This year, the

    number is expected to exceed 10 millionnationwide. Their collective are estimated

    at $18 billion.

    Source: National Association of Professional

    Employer Organizations, Alexandria, Virginia

  • 7/30/2019 PEO - Outsourcing Whitepaper

    6/19

    6

    delegating this task to a professional agency, an SME thus has the potential to affect the

    opportunity costs associated with time spent on HR and the GM can be rendered free to

    concentrate on his core activity, i.e. improve the companys bottom line.

    Generally, the effect that a PEO has on the SME performance occurs through four major

    variables: compensation costs, staff time costs, administrative fees, and HR outcomes.

    How the Integrative Model Works

    PEOs assume responsibility for payroll

    processing; employment taxes; compliance

    matters and correspondence;

    unemployment insurance; and workers'

    compensation audits, areas typically

    handled by the CFO and his or her staff.

    They also assume the burden of proof--

    recordkeeping, documentation and

    explanation--in these areas.

    Because employment-related filings and compliance requirements represent a PEOs

    domain expertise, it can often do so more efficiently than an SME. As a client company

    increases in size, these efficiencies of outsourcing increase. PEOs have professionals on

    staff that stays abreast of the ever-changing laws governing employer-employee relations.

    Their diligence in ensuring their clients' lawful workplace practices--through

    recordkeeping and documentation--removes the stress of monitoring the complexities of

    (1996). Inertia and change in the early years: Employment relations in young, high technology firms.Industrial & Corporate Change, 5, 503-536

  • 7/30/2019 PEO - Outsourcing Whitepaper

    7/19

    7

    workplace regulations from small business executives who can, instead, focus on day-to-

    day operations and overall profitability. The time saved on non-revenue-producing

    activities can thus contribute directly to the company's bottom line.

    The Cost Factor

    Although the model can vary from state to

    state, typically, the client pays the PEO the

    actual cost of wages and benefits plus an

    administrative fee of between 2 and 6% of

    payroll to cover the cost of HR services.11.

    Given that an average PEO client employs

    fewer than 20 workers, PEOs are most cost-

    effective for businesses with fewer than 100

    employees. When an SME crosses that head

    count, the price of a PEOs services may

    equal the cost of having a full-time HR

    staff.

    Business Conditions That Justify

    the Use of a PEO

    To begin with, its extremely important for

    a client to determine whether the

    11Hirschman, C. (1997). All aboard: The boom in employee leasing may bring good career opportunities forHR professionals. HR Magazine, 42, 80-86

    Significant Paperwork Reduction

    An SBA study estimated that theaverage small business owner spends

    between 7% and 25% of his or hertime handling employee-related

    paperwork. When you add in the timespent on all the other HR tasks, thisfigure rises to 35% to 45%. Most

    small business owners recognize justhow valuable a commodity their time

    is and would rather devote theirenergy to core business operations.By outsourcing these functions to a

    PEO, they can concentrate on makingtheir businesses grow.

    (Source:Bruce E. Katz, What a PEO Can Do

    for You,Journal of Accountancy, Vol. 188,1999)

  • 7/30/2019 PEO - Outsourcing Whitepaper

    8/19

    8

    administrative fees charged by a

    PEO are offset by significant

    reductions in compensation costs

    and the cost of internal staff time,

    otherwise the whole purpose to this

    exercise would get defeated12

    .

    According to the Department of

    Labor, a PEO can handle

    administrative responsibilities at

    one-third to two-thirds of the cost an average business would incur to provide similar

    services. Some of the savings are achieved through staff reductions.

    PEOs are also a blessing to companies with foreign operations. An off site PEO can

    enable the company to streamline its accounting procedures in accordance with local

    regulations, ensure regulatory compliance and obtain a level of insurance and benefits

    typically reserved for much larger companies.

    The Risks Involved in Selecting an Appropriate PEO Vendor

    The biggest concern with regard to a PEO --- as with any outsourcing model -- is whether

    the PEO would be able to maintain the same quality of service as was earlier being

    delivered by the SMEs internal staff.13.

    12 Cook, M.F. (1999). Outsourcing human resource functions. American Management Association, NewYork13 Klaas, B.S., McClendon, J., & Gainey, T. (1999). HR outsourcing and its impact: The role of transactioncosts. Personnel Psychology, 52, 113-136

    NetPEOs Service Bouquet

    We provide a whole spectrum of HR

    services

    This includes:

    Payroll services Tax credit Workers Compensation Insurance All other aspects of human resource

    management, related to risk and safetymanagement, compliance, pensionadministration, benefit auditing andpayment remittance

    In short, NetPEO can provide an integratedhuman resource solution for your enterprise.

  • 7/30/2019 PEO - Outsourcing Whitepaper

    9/19

  • 7/30/2019 PEO - Outsourcing Whitepaper

    10/19

    10

    For instance, one PEO may focus primarily on transactional HR services that are more

    administrative and routine in nature, enabling SME client to save both time and money;

    while another may emphasize on providing a broader range of services, including those

    aimed at affecting long-term HR outcomes. Identifying what vendor can best suit your

    business requirements is another area of consultancy where NetPEO can help you make a

    correct choice.

    Trust is another factor that significantly impacts business outcomes from an SME-PEO

    contract. Experts contend that there is more trust in an SME-PEO relationship when an

    SME invests greater efforts in doing a background check on the vendor. This is an area

    where an organization like NetPEO can assist by dipping into its ready resource of PEOs

    and their existing client base, whereas an internet search process could be more tedious

    and time-consuming. The involvement and experience of third-parties can substitute for

    personal experience with the PEO and, thus, facilitate the development of relational trust

    by making it more likely that the parties move beyond skepticism.14

    Broadly, we have experienced that trust in an SME-PEO relationship is more likely when

    SME leaders:

    (1)Utilize the services of neutral parties, such as NetPEO(2)Collect extensive information from existing PEO clients prior to contracting their

    services

    (3)Demonstrate reciprocal concern for the needs of the PEO; and(4)Communicate extensively with PEO representatives

    14Das, T.K. & Teng, B. (1998). Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation inalliances. Academy of Management Review, 23, 491-512.

  • 7/30/2019 PEO - Outsourcing Whitepaper

    11/19

    11

    Last but not the least, NetPEO can also assist in finding an ideal fit between the economic

    and strategic factors impacting an SME-PEO partnership, as well as their attitudes and

    values that is equally crucial for the survival and success of this partnership.

    The Importance of Third Party Brokers

    Brokers like NetPEO provide a crucial link between SMEs and PEOs. The fact cannot be

    over emphasized that the success of any contractual relationship depends largely on an

    SMEs ability to anticipate its needs, the assistance that it receives from consultancies

    such as NetPEO as well as a thorough

    scan and understanding of all

    contingencies existing within a

    contract15. NetPEO can help you draw

    the specifics of this co-employment

    contract that takes into consideration all

    these factors and more.

    Another major benefit that the

    involvement of third party brokers like

    NetPEO offers is that they do all the

    ground work of qualifying potential

    PEO partners for your business. NetPEO

    enables you access to literally dozens of

    PEOs, without the you, i.e., the SME

    15Helper, S. & Levine, D. (1992). Long-term supplier relations and product-market structure. Journal ofLaw, Economics, & Organization, 8, 561-581

    The Birth of a PEO: How It Started?

    In the 1970s, a safe-harbor provision infederal tax legislation enabled companiesto maintain pension plans for managementand key employees that differed from those

    for regular stag employees--provided thestag employees were leased. Although thatsafe harbor disappeared, in 1982 with the

    passage of the Tax Equity and FiscalResponsibility Act, the trend it established

    toward employee leasing continued.Leasing companies extended their servicesto encompass the entire HR area, leading to

    the birth of the PEO.PEOs now perform myriad tasks. Somestates recognize them as "co-employers"since they assume certain legal rights andduties related to employees who work at

    client locations. (Please note: The IRS doesnot use the term co-employer--it recognizesPEOs as employers.) The rights and duties

    PEOs assume are set forth in a contractbetween the PEO and the client company.(Source:Bruce E. Katz, What a PEO Can Do for

    You,Journal of Accountancy, Vol. 188, 1999)

  • 7/30/2019 PEO - Outsourcing Whitepaper

    12/19

    12

    having to invest an inordinate amount of time and effort it takes to complete the due

    diligence process; a process that quite frankly most companies never undertake to their

    own detriment.

    Sometimes, especially with SMEs with global operations, outsourcing can lead to

    unexpected problems. PEOs operating off-site may not understand a firm's employees as

    well as one of their own executives would. This is an area where NetPEO staff can

    mediate to broker peace and better understanding among the two parties.

    Good staff training is also very important to a PEO-SME relationship. This is another

    area where NetPEO can be of assistance to SMEs and PEOs.

    For instance, one of the most important tasks that NetPEO renders is to design the future

    internal organization for monitoring, controlling, and managing the client-vendor

    relationship. Two broad issues that we generally consider in this regard are: the

    organization structure, and the skills and competencies required for this internal

    "extended operations monitoring unit" to work. If we spot an absence of those skills, we

    make arrangements for staff training that could fill that knowledge gap. The result is a

    strong link and control over the outsourced processes in terms of not just cost and time

    saving, but also in terms of establishing along term, sustainable relationship.

    For instance, during our years of experience of operating in this industry, one lesson that

    we have learnt is that a "big-bang" or "clean break" approach of moving work in bulk to

    the second party does not work except for processes that are completely off-line, non-

    business critical, relatively small, and non-time critical.

  • 7/30/2019 PEO - Outsourcing Whitepaper

    13/19

    13

    This cannot of course be said of HR

    functions that impact an SMEs core asset,

    i.e. their manpower resource. So with most

    our clients, we advise a carefully monitored

    transition that ensures business continuity

    and gradual skill transfer.

    This kind of phased transition also eases the

    speed of organizational change and the

    impact on existing employees. It may temporarily delay the business impact and may

    introduce some hardship for the employees, who will have to work for a longer duration

    knowing that they do not have a long-term future with the company, but we have

    experienced that this approach exposes the remaining employees to the emotionally

    draining state that industrial psychologist William Bridges calls the "survivor

    syndrome"16 and prepares them well for the next leg of the journey.

    Again, some firms face unique constraints with regard to how they should manage HR.

    These constraints can be imposed by business or labor market conditions as well as by a

    distinctive organizational culture. Whatever be the cause, these companies often develop

    what are known as an idiosyncratic

    approach to HR.17. Such an approach

    increases the risks of opportunistic

    16Bridges, W.P. (1998). "Change at Work." Work and Occupations. 25(4): 542-545.

    17 Klaas, B.S., McClendon, J., & Gainey, T. (2000). Managing HR in the small and medium enterprise: Theimpact of professional employer organizations. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 25, 107-124; Greer,C.R., Youngblood, S.A., & Gray, D.A. (1999). Human resource outsourcing: The make or buy decision.Academy of Management Executive, 13, 85-96.

  • 7/30/2019 PEO - Outsourcing Whitepaper

    14/19

    14

    behavior by the PEO18

    that only an agency like NetPEO can track, identify and amend

    through contractual clauses. We know from experience that when a PEO contract is

    incomplete or non-specific, the benefits accruing from the SME-PEO relationship will be

    limited and short-lived.

    Selecting the Right PEO for Your Unique Business Needs

    With our strong network of PEOs, NetPEO can help you to select a PEO that:

    Offers core services (payroll, insurance and benefits administration and regulatorycompliance) as well as value-added services such as employee policies and

    procedures, communications and employee manuals

    Has sound infrastructure comprising distinct departments for accounting, payroll,benefits, HR and risk management/compliance

    Has stable financial history and policies that promote continued fiscal integrity(annual audited financial statements and quarterly limited-scope audits to verify

    that all taxes are paid and required filings are made on time)

    Has experienced staff, including HR professionals and certified professionalemployer specialists

    Has access to advanced computer technology and experience-rated systems toadminister professional employer services

    Has a proven track record withother companies of comparable

    18Williamson, O.E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: FreePress

  • 7/30/2019 PEO - Outsourcing Whitepaper

    15/19

    15

    size, industry and situation, including references

    SME Outcomes and Client Receptivity

    Contractual mechanisms are of little value if an SME client choose to ignore a PEO's

    advice about whether to terminate an employee, the need for employee training, or how

    can be provided to employees, to cite just three common areas of confusion or conflict.

    We know from our experience of interacting with dozens of SME clients and PEOs that

    whenever there is a lack of receptivity, the SME is less likely to be able to take full

    advantage of the expertise and programs offered by the PEO.

    In most such cases, the situation can easily be redeemed with the involvement of a third

    party that does not hold any stake in the partnership. (Please note that NetPEO does not

    charge anything from a client SME for its services.)

    Conclusion

    The obligations and administrative

    burdens that a PEO assumes on behalf

    of its clients are strong incentives for

    SMEs to outsource these complex

    employee, tax, benefit and regulatory

    compliance areas.

    Nonetheless, the single most attractive

    advantage that a company hopes to

    gain through a PEO relationship is the ability to offer employees a much wider selection

    of benefits--at considerably lower costs.

  • 7/30/2019 PEO - Outsourcing Whitepaper

    16/19

    16

    Typically, small businesses find it difficult to offer employees multiple options in terms

    of health care plans, insurance (life, disability and accidental death and dismemberment),

    savings and investment plans (401(k) and pension plans) and other employee benefits.

    Due to larger employee pools, PEOs can offer SME employees the same level and quality

    of benefits as bigger companies provide. The results could be improved employee

    satisfaction, better employee retention and the ability to attract high-caliber employees to

    smaller companies. Client companies also enjoy reduced volatility in unemployment and

    workers' compensation insurance rates.

    Additional Resources:

    www.napeo.org: National Association of Professional Employer Organizations. www.peo.com: An online, searchable database of PEOs located throughout the

    world.

  • 7/30/2019 PEO - Outsourcing Whitepaper

    17/19

    17

    Bibliography

    Brian S. Klaas, Professional Employer Organizations and Their Role in Small and MediumEnterprises: The Impact of HR Outsourcing,Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, Vol.28, 2003

    Arthur, J.B. (1992). The link between business strategy and industrial relations systems inAmerican steel mini-mills. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45, 488-506.

    Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management,17, 99-120.

    Baron, J.N., Burton, D.M., & Hannon, M.T. (1996). The road taken: Origins and evolution ofemployment systems in emerging companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 5, 239-275.

    Baron, J.N. & Kreps, D.M. (1999). Strategic human resources. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Barzell, Y. (1982). Measurement cost and the organization of markets. Journal of Law &

    Economics, 25, 27-48.Becket, B.E. & Gerhart, B. (1996). The impact of human resource management on

    organizational performance: Progress and prospects. Academy of Management Journal,39, 779-801.

    Becker, B.E. & Huselid, M.A. (1999). Overview: Strategic human resource management in fiveleading firms. Human Resource Management. 38, 287-302.

    Blau, P.M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.Coleman, J.S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Connor, K.R. & Prahalad, C.K. (1996). A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus

    opportunism. Organizational Science, 7, 477-501.Cook, M.F. (1999). Outsourcing human resource functions. American Management Association,

    New York.Das, T.K. & Teng, B. (1998). Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner

    cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23, 491-512.Delery, J.E. (1999). Issues of fit in strategic human resource management: Implications for

    research. Human Resource Management Review, 8, 289-309.Delery, J.E. & Doty, D.H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management:

    Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions.Academy of Management Journal, 39, 803-835.

    Dow, G. (1987). The function of authority in transaction cost economics. Journal of EconomicBehavior and Organization, 8, 13-38.

    Ghoshal, S. & Moran, P. (1996). Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory.Academy of Management Review, 21, 7-12.

    Greer, C.R., Youngblood, S.A., & Gray, D.A. (1999). Human resource outsourcing: The make or

    buy decision. Academy of Management Executive, 13, 85-96.Gulati, R. (1995). Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual

    choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 85-112.Hannon, M.T., Burton, M.D., & Baron, J.N. (1996). Inertia and change in the early years:

    Employment relations in young, high technology firms. Industrial & Corporate Change,5, 503-536.

    Hart, O. (1988). Incomplete contracts and the theory" of the firm. Journal of Law, Economics &Organization, 4, 119-139.

  • 7/30/2019 PEO - Outsourcing Whitepaper

    18/19

    18

    Helper, S. & Levine, D. (1992). Long-term supplier relations and product-market structure.Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 8, 561-581.

    Hirschman, C. (1997). All aboard: The boom in employee leasing may bring good careeropportunities for HR professionals. HR Magazine, 42, 80-86.

    Hirschman, C. (2000). For PEOs, business is still booming. HR Magazine, 45, 42-48.

    Holoviak, J.J. & DeCenzo, D.A. (1982). Effective employee relations: An aid in small business'sstruggle for survival. American Journal of Small Business, 6, 49-54.Huselid, M.A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover,

    productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal,38,635-672.

    Huselid, M.A., Jackson, S.E., & Schuler, R.S. (1997). Technical and strategic human resourcemanagement effectiveness determinants of firm performance. Academy of ManagementJournal, 40, 171-188.

    Jones, G.R. & George, J.M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications forcooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 23, 531-540.

    Joskow, E (1988). Asset specificity and the structure of vertical relationships: Empirical

    evidence. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 4, 95-117.Klaas, B.S., McClendon, J., & Gainey, T. (1999). HR outsourcing and its impact: The role oftransaction costs. Personnel Psychology, 52, 113-136.

    Klaas, B.S., McClendon, J., & Gainey, T. (2000). Managing HR in the small and mediumenterprise: The impact of professional employer organizations. Entrepreneurship Theory& Practice, 25, 107-124.

    LePak, D.E & Snell, S.A. (1999a). Virtual HR: Strategic human resources in the 21st century.Human Resource Management Review, 8, 215-234.

    LePak, D.P. & Snell, S.A. (1999b). The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of humancapital allocation and development. Academy of Management Review, 24, 31-48.

    Lever, S. (1997). An analysis of managerial motivations behind outsourcing practices in humanresources. Human Resource Planning, 20, 37-48.

    Lewicki, R.J., McAllister, D.J., & Bies, R.J. (1998). Trust and distrust: New relationships andrealities. Academy of Management Review, 23,438-458.

    Masten, S. & Crocker, K. (1985). Efficient adaptation in long-term contracts: Take or payprovisions for natural gas. American Economic Review, 75, 1085-1096.

    Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., & Schoorman, D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust.Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.

    McKnight, D.H., Cummings, L.L., & Chervany, N.L. (1998). Initial trust formation in neworganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23, 473-490.

    NAPEO. (1993). The business of employee leasing, Alexandria, VA: NAPEO.Nooteboom, B., Berger, H., & Noorderhaven, N.G. (1997). Effects of trust and governance on

    relational risk. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 308-338.Ring, P.S. & Van de Ven, A. (1992). Structuring cooperative relations between organizations.

    Strategic Management Journal, 12, 483-498.Riordan, M. & Williamson, O. (1985). Asset specificity and economic organization.

    International Journal of Industrial Organization, 3, 365-378.Sexton, D.L., Upton, N.B., Wacholtz, L.E., & McDougall, P.P. (1997). Learning needs of

    growth-oriented entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 1-8.

  • 7/30/2019 PEO - Outsourcing Whitepaper

    19/19

    19

    Shelanski, H.A. & Klein, P.G. (1995). Empirical work in transaction cost economics. Journal ofLaw; Economics, & Organization, 11,335-361.

    Ulrich, D. (1996). Human resource champions. Boston: Harvard University Press.Walker, G. & Weber, D. (1984). A transaction cost approach to make or buy decisions.

    Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 373-391.

    Welbourne, T.A. & Cyr, L.A. (1999). The human resource executive effect in initial publicoffering firms. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 616-632.Williamson, O.E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New

    York: Free Press.Williamson, O.E. (1996). The mechanisms of governance. New York: Oxford University Press.Wright, P.M., Gerhart, B., Snell, S.A., & McMahan, G.C. (1997). Strategic human resource

    management: Building human capital and organizational capacity. Technical Report,SHRM Foundation and Human Resource Planning Society Alexandria, VA.

    Wright, P.M., Smart, D.L., & McMahan, G.C. (1995). Matches between human resources andstrategy among NCAA basketball teams. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1052-1074.

    Bruce E. Katz, What a PEO Can Do for You,Journal of Accountancy, Vol. 188, 1999.Phaedra Brotherton, HR Efficiency without the Hassles, Black Enterprise, Vol. 31, September2000.