18
Penn State’s Interactive Advising System: Exceeding Expectations Through the Web CUMREC 2001 Phoenix, Arizona

Penn State’s Interactive Advising System: Exceeding Expectations Through the Web CUMREC 2001 Phoenix, Arizona

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Penn State’s Interactive Advising System: Exceeding Expectations Through the Web CUMREC 2001 Phoenix, Arizona

Penn State’s Interactive Advising System:

Exceeding Expectations Through the Web

CUMREC 2001Phoenix, Arizona

Page 2: Penn State’s Interactive Advising System: Exceeding Expectations Through the Web CUMREC 2001 Phoenix, Arizona

Today’s Presentation

The development philosophy and background

Demonstration of services

Development Challenges

Page 3: Penn State’s Interactive Advising System: Exceeding Expectations Through the Web CUMREC 2001 Phoenix, Arizona

Vision Statement

Students to participate in informed educational planning.

Faculty to deliver active learning.

Advisers to provide exemplary service.

Staff to operate effectively and efficiently.

Alumni to maintain a life-long relationship.

The Web will provide the ability for:

Page 4: Penn State’s Interactive Advising System: Exceeding Expectations Through the Web CUMREC 2001 Phoenix, Arizona

Collaboration – the Key to Success

Executive level sponsorship

Senior level governance team

Expert content specialists

Standards based, collaborative application development

Page 5: Penn State’s Interactive Advising System: Exceeding Expectations Through the Web CUMREC 2001 Phoenix, Arizona

Institutional Complexity

Expanded facilities, services, programs

Manage enrollment growth

Complexity of degree requirements

Complex academic policies

Student responsibility in their own decisions

Page 6: Penn State’s Interactive Advising System: Exceeding Expectations Through the Web CUMREC 2001 Phoenix, Arizona

Student Characteristics

Unrealistic expectations - grades, study hours, study skills

Uncertainty concerning choice of major

Non-traditional students

Academics, not administrative details

Students as consumers – expect timely, complete, consistent, accurate information

Page 7: Penn State’s Interactive Advising System: Exceeding Expectations Through the Web CUMREC 2001 Phoenix, Arizona

Faculty Characteristics

Unable to stay current with policies, procedures, requirements

Perception that advising includes much “red tape”

Minimal training and resources

Minimal recognition for advising activities

Page 8: Penn State’s Interactive Advising System: Exceeding Expectations Through the Web CUMREC 2001 Phoenix, Arizona

Development Timetable

Vision - May 1994

Prototype - November 1996

“Quiet Phase” - March 1997

Production Release 1 - August 1997

Subsequent production releases approximately every 6 months

Page 9: Penn State’s Interactive Advising System: Exceeding Expectations Through the Web CUMREC 2001 Phoenix, Arizona
Page 10: Penn State’s Interactive Advising System: Exceeding Expectations Through the Web CUMREC 2001 Phoenix, Arizona

Expert System Approach

REASONS

T I M I N G

ALTERNATIVES

O U T C O M E S

Page 11: Penn State’s Interactive Advising System: Exceeding Expectations Through the Web CUMREC 2001 Phoenix, Arizona

Required Outcomes

Reliability – available, repeatable, dependable

Consistent – fair, unbiased, “best of class”

Accurate – clearly communicated

Scalable – economical to grow and expand

Not bounded by time or place

Page 12: Penn State’s Interactive Advising System: Exceeding Expectations Through the Web CUMREC 2001 Phoenix, Arizona

Demonstration

On the web ateLion.psu.edu

Page 13: Penn State’s Interactive Advising System: Exceeding Expectations Through the Web CUMREC 2001 Phoenix, Arizona

Development Challenges

Staffing Issues

Technical Issues

Design and Implementation Issues

Page 14: Penn State’s Interactive Advising System: Exceeding Expectations Through the Web CUMREC 2001 Phoenix, Arizona

Staffing Issues

Shortage of IT professionals

Retaining qualified IT staff

Learning new tools and the Smalltalk language

Lack of Smalltalk mentors

Page 15: Penn State’s Interactive Advising System: Exceeding Expectations Through the Web CUMREC 2001 Phoenix, Arizona

Technical Issues

Scalability

Stability and Reliability

Availability

Accessibility

Security

Monitoring and Diagnostic Tools

Page 16: Penn State’s Interactive Advising System: Exceeding Expectations Through the Web CUMREC 2001 Phoenix, Arizona

(WebSphere Performance Pack)

EnterpriseData Server

(IBM MVS Mainframe)

SecurityServers(Sun - Solaris)

eLionDatabase Servers

(Windows-NT Pentium)(Windows SQL Server)

Other WebServers

WebBrowser

Web/ApplicationServers

(Windows-NT Pentium)

(Netscape Enterprise Server)

s s ss ….

SecurityProxy

(WebKerb.dll)(Kerb95.dll)

s s

MandarinI-Face

(WebComm.dll)

s

m m….

…..

eLionLOAD

BALANCERS(Windows - NT Pentium)

eLion Technical Architecture

m

WebBrowser(Win 3.1)

(SSL)

(SSL)

(HTTP)

(CUSSP)(KERBEROS)

(SQL)

WebBrowser(Win 95)

WebBrowser(Win NT)

WebBrowser(MAC)

WebBrowser(UNIX)

WebBrowser(Other)

80,000 Clients

(SSL)

#1

#6

#1#2

(Visual-Wave Server)

Page 17: Penn State’s Interactive Advising System: Exceeding Expectations Through the Web CUMREC 2001 Phoenix, Arizona

Design and Implementation Issues

Change of focus -staff-oriented to customer-

oriented

Presentation standards

Formal procedures

Page 18: Penn State’s Interactive Advising System: Exceeding Expectations Through the Web CUMREC 2001 Phoenix, Arizona

Questions?

J. James Wager, [email protected] W. Thompson, [email protected]

Carol S. Findley, [email protected]