Peningkatan Kualitas Bungkil Inti Sawit oleh Kapang ...repository.ipb.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/40575/BAB VII... · 100 Farel DJ. 1974. General Principles and Assumtion of

DAFTAR PUSTAKA Amrullah IK. 2003. Nutrisi Ayam Broiler. Bogor : Lembaga Satu Gunung Budi. Anonimous 2003. Fructose and mannose metabolism.

www.chem.qmul.ac.uk/iubmb/enzyme. Pebruari 16th 2003 Anggorodi HR. 1995. Nutrisi Aneka Ternak Unggas. Jakarta : PT. Gramedia

Pustaka Utama. Antheunisse J. 1979. Observation on the decomposition of coconut fiber. J Gen

Appl Microbiol 25: 177-181 A.O.A.C. 1984. Methods of Analysis. 13th Ed. Washington D.C : Association of

Official Agricultural Chemist.. Blakely J and Blade DH. 1991. Ilmu Peternakan. Terjemahan Edisi 4.

Yogjakarta : Gajah Mada University Press. Bolam DN, and Gilbert HJ. 1996. Mannanase from Pseudomonas fluorescens

sp. cellulosa is a retaining glycosyl hydrolase in which E212 and E320 are the putative catalytic residues. J Biochem 35: 16195–16204.

Braithwaite KL, Black GW, Hazlewood GP, Ali BR, Gilbert HJ. 2001. A non-

modular endo-beta-1,4-mannanase from Pseudomonas fluorescens subspecies cellulosa. J Biochem 305: 1005–1010.

Cadogan DJ, Choct M, Campbell RG, and Kershaw S. 1999. Effects new season

wheats on the growth performance of young male pigs. In: Manipulating pig production VII. Werribe : Australian Pig Science Association.

Chanzy H, Pérez S, Miller DP, Paradossi G, Winter WT. 1987. An electron

diffraction study of mannan I. Crystal and molecular structure. J Macromol 20: 2407–2413.

Chen Y, Long J, Liao L, Zhang Y, Yang J . 2000. Study on the production of

beta-mannanase by Bacillus M50. Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao ; 40(1):62-8.

Chin FY. 2002. Utilization of palm kernel cake (PKC) as feed in Malaysia. Asian Livestock. Vol. XXVI No. 4. FAO Regional Office. Bangkok, Thailand.

Chong CH, Blair R, Zulkifli I, and Jelan ZA. 1998. Physical and chemical

characteristics of Malaysian palm kernel cake (PKC). Proc. 20th MSAP Conf. 27-28 July. Putrajaya. Malaysia.

Chung, D.S and Lee CH. 1985. Grain physical and thermal properties related to

drying and aeration. ACIAR Proceeding No. 71 Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Australia

Coulombel, Clermont CS, Foglietti M, and Pherceron F. 1981. Transglycosylation reactions catalysed by two β-mannanases. J Biochem 195:333-335.

99

Darwis AA, Sukara E, Amirroenas DE, Purwanti E. 1991. Optimasi proses biokonversi pod kakao sebagai makanan ternak oleh Trichoderma viridae. Makalah Seminar Bioteknologi Perkebunan dan Lokakarya Biopolimer untuk Industri. Bogor;10-11 Desember 1991

Daskiran M, Teeter RG, Fodge D, and Hsiao HY. 2004. An evaluation of endo-

β-D-Mannanase (Hemicell®) effects on broiler performance and energy use in diets varying in β-Mannan content. J Poult Sci 83:662-668.

Daud MJ, Jarvis MC, and Rasidah A. 1993. Fibre of PKC and its potential as

poultry feed. Proceeding. 16th MSAP Annual. Conference. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Daud MJ, and Jarvis MC. 1992. Mannan of palm kernel. J Phytochem 31:463-

464. Daud MJ, and Jarvis MC. 1993. Effect of driselase on the nutritive value of PKC

for poultry diets. Proceeding. 16th MSAP Annual. Conference. Penang, Malaysia.

Daud MJ. 1995. Technical innovation in the utilization of local feed resources for

more efficient animal production. Proceeding. 17th MSAP Annual. Conference. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Deborah H, Pell G, Dupree P, Goubet F, Martin-Orue SM, Armand S, and

Gilbert HJ. 2003. The modular architecture of Cellvibrio japonicus mannanases in glycoside hydrolase families 5 and 26 points to differences in their role in mannan degradation. J Biochem 371: 1027-1043.

[Deptan] Departemen Pertanian 1995. Pedoman umum penanganan pasca

panen produk peternakan. Subdit Pascapanen Peternakan. Direktorat Penanganan Pascapanen. Ditjen Pengolahan dan Pemasaran Hasil Pertanian. Departemen Pertanian. Jakarta

Devendra L. 1977. The Utilization of feedingstuffs from the oil palm feedingstuffs

for livestock in South East Asia. Malaysia Agricultural Research and Development Institute. Serdang-Selangor, Malaysia.

Dubois, M., Giles KA, Hamilton JK, Reber PA and Smith F. 1956. Colorimetric

method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28: 350-356

El Mubarak AK, and Abuelgasim AI. 1990. The occurrence of infectious bursal

disease in major poultry producing area in Sudan. Bulletin Animal Health and Production in Africa 38:293-296.

Ensminger ME, Oldfield JE and Heineman WW. 1995. Feeds and Nutrition 2nd

Ed. California : The Ensminger Publishing Company. Fardiaz S. 1998. Fisiologi Fermentasi. Bogor : Pusat Antar Universitas –

Lembaga Sumberdaya Informasi IPB.

100

Farel DJ. 1974. General Principles and Assumtion of Calorimetry in Energy

Requirements of Poultry. British Poultry Science Ltd. Great Britanian. Frazier WC, and Westhoff DC. 1978. Food Microbiology. New Delhi : Tata

McGraw Hill Book Publ. Co. Glenn RD, and Roger PL. 1988. A Solid substrate fermentation process for an

animal feed product studies of fungal strain improvement. Aust J Biotechnol 2:50-57.

Goubet F, Jackson P, Deery M, and Dupree P. 2002. Polysaccharide analysis

using carbohydrate gel electrophoresis (PACE): a method to study plant cell wall polysaccharides and polysaccharide hydrolases. J Anal Biochem 30: 53-68.

Hagglund P, Eriksson T, Collen A, Nerinckx W, Claeyssens M, Stalbrand H.

2003. Cellulose-binding module of the Trichoderma reesei beta-mannanase Man5A increases the mannan-hydrolysis of complex substrates. J Biotechnol 27(1):37-48.

Haltrich D, Nidetzky B, Kulbe KD, Steiner W, Fiesher A. 1996. Pectinase from

Trichoderma reesei QM9414. Biotechnol Bioeng 25:1985-1990 Hartadi H, Reksohadiprodjo S, Lebdosukojo S, Tillman AD, Kearl AC, and

Harris LE. 1980. Tabel-tabel dari Komposisi Bahan Makanan Ternak untuk Indonesia. Yogjakarta : Gajah Mada University Press.

Hartley CWS. 1970. The Oil Palm. London : Longman Group. Hew VF, and Jalaludin S. 1996. Palm product and by-products for monogastrics

in Malaysia. First International Symposium on the Integration of Livestock to Oil Palm Production. Kuala Lumpur. Malaysia.

Hilge M, Gloor SM, Rypsniewski W, Sauer O, Heightman TD, Zimmermann W,

Winterhalter K, Piontek K. 1998. High-resolution native and complex structures of thermostable-mannanase from Thermonospora fusca– substrate specificity in glycosyl hydrolase family 5. Biomednet Vol. 6 no. 11.

Hill FW, Anderson DL, Renner R and Carew LB. 1960. Studies of the

metabolizable energy of grain and grain products for chicken. J Poult Sci 39:573-583.

Hogg D, Pell G, Dupree P, Goubet F, Martin-orue S, Armand S and Gilbert HJ.

2003. The modular architecture of Cellvibrio japonicus mannanases in glycoside hydrolase families 5 and 26 points to different in their role in mannan degradation. J Biochem 371:1027-1043.

Hutagalung R. 1978. Non-tradisional feedingstuffs for livestock. Proceeding of

Symposium on Feedingstuffs for Livestock in South East Asia. Malaysian Society of Animal Production. Serdang. Malaysia.

101

Hutagalung R, and Jalaludin S. 1982. Feeds for farm animal from the oil palm.

University Pertanian Malaysia, Serdang Publication No. A.49. Malaysia. Irawadi TT. 1991. Produksi enzim ekstraseluler dan xilanase dari Neurosphora

sitophila pada substrat limbah padat kelapa sawit. [disertasi]. Bogor; Sekolah Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor

Jackson ME. 2002. Hemicell feed enzyme – field and penn trial data for swine,

broiler, duck, laying hen and turkeys. ChemGen Corp. Helmswood Cir. Marietta, GA USA

[JFE] Jakarta Future Exchange. 2002. Perkembangan produksi minyak goreng

sawit di Indonesia. www.bbj-ifx.com. Kamal. 1984. Pemanfaatan bungkil inti sawit sebagai pakan ayam. Proceeding

Seminar Lembaga Kimia Nasional LIPI. Bandung. Kataoka N, and Tokiwa Y. 1998. Isolation and characterization of an active

mannanase-producing anaerobic bacterium, Clostridium tertium KT-5A, from lotus soil. J Appl Microbiol 84(3):357-367.

Keong NW. 2004. Researching the use of palm kernel cake in aquaculture feeds. Penang : Fish Nutrition Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia

Ketaren PP, Sinurat AP, Zainuddin, Purwadaria T, dan Kompiang IP. 1999.

Bungkil inti sawit dan produk fermentasinya sebagai pakan ayam pedaging.J Ilmu Ternak dan Vet 4(2):107-112

Khalil. 1999. Pengaruh kandungan air dan ukuran partikel terhadap sifat fisik

pakan lokal : Sudut tumpukan, kerapatan tumpukan, kerapatan pemadatan tumpukan, berat jenis, daya ambang dan faktor higroskopis. Media Peternakan 22 (1):1-11.

Kling M, und Woehlbier. 1983. Handelstuttermittel. Stuttgart : Band 2A. Verlaq

Eugen Ulmer, Knudsen KEB. 1997. Carbohydrate and lignin contents of plant materials used in

animal feeding. Animal Feed Science Technology, 67:319-338 Kompiang IP, Sinurat AP, Kompiang S, Purwadaria T, dan Darma J. 1994.

Nutritional value of enriched cassava: Casapro. Ilmu dan Peternakan. 7:22-25

Kumar A, Dingle JG, Wiryawan KG and Cresswell DC. 1997. Enzyme for

improved nutritional value of layer diets In: Queendsland Poultry Science Symposium. The University of Queendsland, Gatton

Kusakabe I. 1990. A simple method for elucidating structures of galactomanno-

oligosaccharides by sequential actions of b-mannosidase and a-galactosidase. J Agric Biol Chem 54:1081-1083.

102

Leeson S, Diaz G, and Summers JG. 1995. Poultry Metabolic Disorders and Mycotoxin. Guelph : University Book.

Llyod LE, McDonald BE, and Crampton EW. 1978. Fundamentals of Nutrition.

2nd Ed. San Francisco : WH. Freeman and Company. [LRPI] Lembaga Riset Perkebunan Indonesia. 2006. Pemanfaatan oleokimia

berbasis minyak sawit. Media Komunikasi Lingkup Unit Kerja LRPI . Vol.2 No. 2. Bogor.

Lubis DA. 1980. Pengaruh pemberian bungkil inti biji kelapa sawit terhadap

pertumbuhan anak ayam pedaging. [thesis]. Bogor; Fakultas Pascasarjana Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Mahfudz LD, Srigandono B, Sarengat W, Lingganingrum FS, Widayati A.

1998. Effecs of temperature and energy-protein ration on the performance of broiler chicken. Bulletin of Animal Science, Supplement Edition page 446-449.

May JD, and Lott BD. 1992. Feed and water consumption patterns of broiler at

high environmental temperatures. J Poult Sci 71:331-336. Mazhar AM. 1995. Newcastle disease and homeopathy. World Poultry. 11:61. McDonald P, Edwards RA, Greenhalg JFD, and Morgan CA. 1995. Animal

Nutrition. 5th Ed. New York : Longman Scientific and Technical. McGinnis MR, and Trying SK. 2003. Introduction to Mycology. San Diego : Academic Press. McNally EH, and Spicknall NH. 1975. Meat Yield from live, dressed and

eviscerated RIR chicken during growth and maturity. J Poult Sci 34:145-148

Mikkonen K, Helen H, Talja R, Willfor S, Holmbom B, Hyvonen L, Tenkanen

M. 2006. Biodegradable film from mannans. Helsinki : Department of Food Technology, University of Helsinki FIN-00014 Finland.

MINITAB. 2004. MINITAB® Release 14 Statistical Software for Window.

MINITAB Inc. Moat AG. 1979. Microbial Physiology. New York : John Willey and Sons Inc. Mountney GJ. 1976. Poultry Production Technology. Wesport : The Avi

Publishing Company Inc. Connecticut Mustaffa AB, Zairi M, and Hawari H. 1991. Palm kernel cake in cattle feedlotting.

J ASEAN Food 6(3):102-103. Naibaho. 1990. Prospek pengembangan industri hilir kelapa sawit. Kumpulan

Makalah Pertemuan Teknis Kelapa Sawit. Pekanbaru.

103

Nattorp A, Martin G, Christian S, and Albert R. 1999. Model for random hydrolysis and degradation of linear pollysaccharides: Aplication of the thermal treatment of mannan in solution. Int Eng Chem Res 38 (8): 2919-2926

North MO, and Bell DD. 1990. Commercial Chicken Production Manual. 4th Ed.

New York : Chapman and Hall. [NRC] National Research Council. 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th

Ed. Washington : National Academy Press. Nwokolo EN, Bragg DB, and Kitts WO. 1976. The availability of amino acid from

palm kernel meal, soybean meal, cotton seed meal and rapeseed meal for growing chick. J Poult Sci 55:2300-2304

Onwudike OC. 1986a. Palm Kernel Meal as a Feed for Poultry 1. composition of

palm kernel meal and availability of its amino acid to chicks. In: Animal Feed Science and Technology. Elsevier Science Publisher BV. Amsterdam. 16:179-186.

Onwudike OC. 1986b. Palm Kernel Meal as a Feed for Poultry 2. Diet containing

palm kernel meal for starter and grower. Animal feed Science and Technology. Elsevier Science Publisher B.V., Amsterdam 16:187-194

Onwudike OC. 1986c. Palm Kernel Meal as a Feed for Poultry 3. Replacement of

groundnut cake by palm kernel meal in broiler diets. Animal feed Science and Technology. Elsevier Science Publisher B.V., Amsterdam 16:195-202

Osei SA, and Josephine A. 1987. Palm kernel cake as a broiler feed ingredient.

J Poult Sci 66:1870-1873. Pelczar MJ, and Reid RD. 1972. Microbiology. New York : McGraw Hill Book Co. Perez JF, Gernat AG, and Murillo JG. 2000. The effect of different level of palm

kernel meal in layer diets. J Poult Sci 79:77-79 Power R. 1997. The bioscience center concept: A guideline for cooperation

between universities and industry. Proc. Alltech 11 th Annual Asia Pacific Lecture Tour. 133-148.

Puls J, and Poutanen K. 1981. Mechanism of Enzyme Hydrolosid of

Hemicelulose (Xylan) and Procedure for Determination of Enzyme Activities Involved. Hamburg : BHF Institut of Wood Chemistry Leuchnecster.

Puls J, Poutanen K, Komer HU, Viikari L. 1985. Biotechnical utilization of wood

carbohydrates after steaming pre-treatment. J Appl Microbiol Biotech 22:416-423

Purwadaria T. 2002. Optimation of mannanase production. [research report]

Animal Research Institute. Ciawi Bogor.

104

Purwadaria T, Sinurat AP, Haryati T, Sutikno I, Supriyati dan Darma J. 1998. Korelasi antara aktivitas enzim mannanase dan selulase terhadap kadar serat lumpur sawit hasil fermentasi dengan Aspergillus niger.[laporan penelitian]. Balai Penelitian Ternak Ciawi, Bogor.

Rahman A. 1992. Teknologi Fermentasi. Jakarta : Penerbit Arcan. Regalado C, Barrera LMV, Almendárez GBE, Huerta-Ochoa S, López G.

1995a. Production and properties of β-mannanase by solid substrate fermentation of soluble coffee industry wastes using Trichoderma reesei IMI 192656. [research report]. Departement of Food Research and Postgraduate Studies. Facultad De Química. Universidad Autónoma De Querétaro. C.U. Cerro De Las Campanas. Querétaro Qro. 76010. Mexico.

Regalado C, Barrera LMV, Almendárez GBE, Huerta-Ochoa S, López G.

1995b. Production and partial characterization of b-mannanase obtained from solid substrate fermentation of copra and coffee wastes using Aspergillus orizae. [research report]. Departement of Food Research and Postgraduate Studies. Facultad De Química, Universidad Autónoma De Querétaro. C.U. Cerro De Las Campanas. Querétaro Qro. 76010. Mexico.

Rehm HJ, and Reed G. 1981. Microbial Fundamentals. Biotech. I. Weibheim :

Verlgchemic Gmbh. Rhule SWA. 1996. Growth rate and carcass characteristics of pigs fed on diets

containing palm kernel cake. Animal Feed Science Technology. Amsterdam : Elsevier Science B.V.

Rizal Y. 2000. Response of broiler chickens on the substitution of palm kernel

cake for soybean meal in rations. Jurnal Peternakan dan Lingkungan. Vol. 6(2):15-20.

Rose SP. 1997. Principles of Poultry Science. . London : CAB International. Ross SAC, Duncan JG, Pasco DS, and Pugh N. 2002. Isolation of a

galactomannan that enhances macrophage activation from the edible fungus Morchella esculenta. J Agric Food Chem 50:5683-5685.

Ruttloff C. 1981. Technologis Mischfuttermittel. Leipzig : VEB Fachbuchverlag, Sabini E, Wilson KS, Siika-aho M, Boisset C, Chanzy H. 2000. Digestion of single

crystals of mannan I by an endo-mannanase from Trichoderma reesei. Eur J Biochem 267: 2340-2344

Sainsbury D. 1984. Poultry Health and Management. 2nd Ed. New York : Granada

Technical Books. Samonte JL. 2003. β-Mannosidase Activity in Germinating Coconuts. Cavite : De

La Salle University-Dasmarinas.

105

Santiago SD, Gonzalez CR, Almendarez BG, Fernandez FJ, Jurado AT, Huerta-Ochoa S. 2006. Physiological, morphological, and mannanase production studies on Aspergillus niger uam-gs1 mutans. Elec J of Biotechnol. 9(1):217-226. http://www.ejbbiotechnology-info/content/vol19/ issue1/full/2

[SAS Institute]. 1996. The SAS System for Windows Software Release 6.12.

SAS® Users Guide. SAS Institute Inc. Cary. NC. United State Scott ML, Nesheim MC, and Young RJ. 1982. Nutrient of The Chicken. 3rd Ed.

ML. Scott and Associates. Itacha. New York. Shannon DWF, and Brown WO. 1969. Losses of energy nitrogen of drying

poultry excreta. J Poult Sci 48:41-43 Shurtleff W, and Aoyagi A. 1979. The Book of Tempeh: A Super Soy Food from

Indonesia. New York : Harper and Row. Sibbald IR. 1983. The T.M.E System of Feed Evaluation. Animal Research

Centre. Canada. Sibbald IR. 1989. Metabolizable energy evaluation of poultry diets. In Cole, DJA.

and Haresign W (ed). Recent Development in Poultry Nutrition. London : University of Nottingham School of Agriculture. Butter Worths. Sibbald IR. and Wolynetz MS. 1985. Estimates of retained nitrogen used to

correct estimates of bioavailable energy. J Poult Sci 64:1506-1513 Sindu A. 1999. Pemanfaatan limbah kelapa sawit sebagai pakan ternak. Jurnal

Sains dan Teknologi Indonesia. 1(3):82-86. Smith JE, and Pateman JA. 1977. Genetics and Physiology of Aspergillus. .

London : Academic Press. Soeharsono. 1976. Respon broiler terhadap berbagai kondisi lingkungan.

[disertasi]. Bandung; Universitas Padjadjaran Bandung Soesanto IRH. 2000. Comparative Studies on The Responses of Red Jungle

Fowl and Commercial Broiler to Nutritional Manipulattions. [disertation].Malaysia; University Putra Malaysia.

Southgate DAT. 1976. Determination of Food Carbohydrates. London : Applied

Science Publisher Ltd. Steel RGD, and Torrie JH. 1995. Prinsip dan Prosedur Statistika : Suatu

Pendekatan Biometrik. Penerjemah Bambang S. Edisi ke-2. Jakarta : PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Storey ML, and Allen NK. 1982. Apparent and true metabolizable energy of

feedingstuffs for mature, non laying female ambden geese. J Poult Sci 60:747-752.

106

Supriyati , Pasaribu T, Hamid H, Sinurat AP. 1998. Fermentasi Bungkil inti sawit secara substrat padat dengan menggunakan Aspergillus niger. J Ilmu Ternak dan Vet 3(3):165-170

Tangendjaja B. dan Pattyusra P. 1993. Bungkil inti sawit dan pollard gandum

yang difermentasi dengan Rhizophus oligosphorus untuk ayam pedaging. Ilmu dan Peternakan 6(2):30-33.

Tillman AD, Hartadi H, Reksohadiprodjo S, dan Lebdosukodjo S. 1998. Ilmu

Makanan Ternak Dasar. Yogjakarta : Gajah Mada University Press. Umunna NN, Yusuf AA, and Aganga AA. 1980. Evaluation of brewers dried

grains and palm kernel meal as major sources of nitrogen for growing cattle. J Trop Anim Prod 5(3):239-247

Van Soest P.J, and Robertson JB. 1968. System of analysis for evaluating

fibrous feeds. In: Standarization of Analytical Methodology for Feed. Pigdem JW, Balch CC, dan Graham M (eds). IDRC Canada

Vranjes V, and Wenk C. 1995. The influence of extruded vs untreated barley in

the feed, with or without dietary enzyme supplement on broiler performance. J Anim Feed Sci and Tech 54:21-32

Wahju J. 1972. Feed formulation pattern for growing chick based on nitrogen

retention, nitrogen consumed and metabilizable energy. [disertation]. USA; Wisconsin University

Wahju J. 1997. Ilmu Nutrisi Unggas. Yogjakarta : Gajah Mada University Press. Wahju J, dan Sugandi D. 1984. Penuntun Praktis Beternak Ayam. Cetakan ke-3.

Bogor : Fakultas Peternakan Institut Pertanian Bogor Wang DIC, Connel CL, Demain AL, Dunhill P, Humpherey AF, Lily MD. 1979.

Fermentation and Enzyme Technology. New York : John Wiley and Sons. Warren RAJ. Microbial hydrolysis of polysaccharides. Annual review of

Microbiology, 50:183-212 Wiseman, 1985. Hanbook of Enzyme Biotechnology. New York : John Willey and

Sons. Yeong SW, and Mukherjee TK. 1983. The effect of palm oil supplementation in

palm kernel cake-based diets on the performance of broiler chickens. MARDI Ress. Bull. 11:378-384

Xiong H. 2004. Production and characteristization of Trichoderma reesei and

Thermomyces lanuginosus xylanases.[dissertation].Helsinki; Helsinki University of Technology

Xu BV, Hägglund P, Stålbrand H, and Janson JC. 2002. Endo-beta-1,4-

Mannanases from blue mussel, Mytilus edulis: purification, characterization, and mode of action. J Biotechnol 92:267-277.

LAMPIRAN

108

Lampiran 1 Analisis varian dan uji Duncan berat jenis bungkil inti sawit Analysis of Variance Procedure Dependent Variable: Berat Jenis (BJ) Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 2 0.06652853 0.03326427 7.92 0.0064 Error 12 0.05038440 0.00419870 Corrected Total 14 0.11691293 R-Square C.V. Root MSE BJ Mean 0.569043 4.481973 0.06479738 1.44573333 Source DF Anova SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F TRTMENT 2 0.06652853 0.03326427 7.92 0.0064

Duncan's Multiple Range Test for variable: Berat Jenis (BJ)

Alpha= 0.05 df= 12 MSE= 0.004199 Number of Means 2 3 Critical Range .08929 .09346 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. Duncan Grouping Mean N TRTMENT A 1.52120 5 c A 1.45680 5 b B 1.35920 5 a Lampiran 2 Analisis varian dan uji Duncan kerapatan tumpukan bungkil inti sawit Analysis of Variance Procedure Dependent Variable: Kerapatan Tumpukan (KRPT) Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 2 0.00820213 0.00410107 103.04 0.0001 Error 12 0.00047760 0.00003980 Corrected Total 14 0.00867973 R-Square C.V. Root MSE KRPT Mean 0.944975 1.052975 0.00630872 0.59913333 Source DF Anova SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F TRTMENT 2 0.00820213 0.00410107 103.04 0.0001

Duncan's Multiple Range Test for variable: KRPT Alpha= 0.05 df= 12 MSE= 0.00004 Number of Means 2 3 Critical Range .008693 .009100 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. Duncan Grouping Mean N TRTMENT A 0.6240 5 c B 0.5830 5 b B 0.5822 5 a

109

Lampiran 3 Analisis varian dan uji Duncan kerapatan pemadatan tumpukan bungkil inti sawit Analysis of Variance Procedure Dependent Variable: Kerapatan Pemadatan Tumpukan (KRPTUM) Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 2 0.00362013 0.00181007 52.06 0.0001 Error 12 0.00041720 0.00003477 Corrected Total 14 0.00403733 R-Square C.V. Root MSE KRPTUM Mean 0.896664 0.824277 0.00589633 0.71533333 Source DF Anova SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F TRTMENT 2 0.00362013 0.00181007 52.06 0.0001

Duncan's Multiple Range Test for variable: KRPTUM Alpha= 0.05 df= 12 MSE= 0.000035 Number of Means 2 3 Critical Range .008125 .008505 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. Duncan Grouping Mean N TRTMENT A 0.727400 5 b A 0.725200 5 c B 0.693400 5 a Lampiran 4 Analisis varian dan uji Duncan sudut tumpukan (SDT) bungkil inti sawit Analysis of Variance Procedure Dependent Variable: SDT (sudut tumpukan) Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 2 124.19609333 62.09804667 28.17 0.0001 Error 12 26.45700000 2.20475000 Corrected Total 14 150.65309333 R-Square C.V. Root MSE SDT Mean 0.824385 5.790506 1.48484006 25.64266667 Source DF Anova SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F TRTMENT 2 124.19609333 62.09804667 28.17 0.0001

Duncan's Multiple Range Test for variable: SDT Alpha= 0.05 df= 12 MSE= 2.20475 Number of Means 2 3 Critical Range 2.046 2.142 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. Duncan Grouping Mean N TRTMENT A 29.7120 5 a B 23.6100 5 b B 23.6060 5 c

110

Lampiran 5 Analisis varian dan uji Duncan daya ambang bungkil inti sawit Analysis of Variance Procedure Dependent Variable: Daya Ambang (DYAM) Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 2 0.00336000 0.00168000 6.22 0.0140 Error 12 0.00324000 0.00027000 Corrected Total 14 0.00660000 R-Square C.V. Root MSE DYAM Mean 0.509091 2.785030 0.01643168 0.59000000 Source DF Anova SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F TRTMENT 2 0.00336000 0.00168000 6.22 0.0140

Duncan's Multiple Range Test for variable: DYAM Alpha= 0.05 df= 12 MSE= 0.00027 Number of Means 2 3 Critical Range .02264 .02370 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. Duncan Grouping Mean N TRTMENT A 0.60600 5 c A 0.59400 5 a B 0.56000 5 b Lampiran 6 Analisis varian dan uji Duncan modulus of fineness (MF) bungkil inti sawit Analysis of Variance Procedure Dependent Variable: Modulus of Finenes Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 2 0.10327387 0.05163693 69.47 0.0001 Error 12 0.00891939 0.00074328 Corrected Total 14 0.11219326 R-Square C.V. Root MSE MF Mean 0.920500 0.584301 0.02726321 4.66595333 Source DF Anova SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F TRTMENT 2 0.10327387 0.05163693 69.47 0.0001 Duncan's Multiple Range Test for variable: MF Alpha= 0.05 df= 12 MSE= 0.000743 Number of Means 2 3 Critical Range .03757 .03932 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. Duncan Grouping Mean N TRTMENT A 4.77286 5 a B 4.65440 5 c C 4.57060 5 b

111

Lampiran 7 Analisis varian dan uji Duncan rataan diameter (cm) bungkil inti sawit Analysis of Variance Procedure Dependent Variable: Rata-rata diameter bahan Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 2 0.00353318 0.00176659 69.89 0.0001 Error 12 0.00030332 0.00002528 Corrected Total 14 0.00383650 R-Square C.V. Root MSE RATDIAM Mean 0.920938 1.898255 0.00502759 0.26485333 Source DF Anova SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F TRTMENT 2 0.00353318 0.00176659 69.89 0.0001 Duncan's Multiple Range Test for variable: Rata-rata diameter bahan Alpha= 0.05 df= 12 MSE= 0.000025 Number of Means 2 3 Critical Range .006928 .007252 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. Duncan Grouping Mean N TRTMENT A 0.284820 5 a B 0.262240 5 c C 0.247500 5 b Lampiran 8 Hasil analisis varian pengaruh dosis dan ketebalan media terhadap

kandungan bahan kering media Factor Type Levels Values TEBAL SU fixed 3 1 2 3 DOSIS KA fixed 3 1 2 3 Analysis of Variance for BK, using Adjusted SS for Tests Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P TEBAL SU 2 1.007 1.007 0.503 0.40 0.674 DOSIS KA 2 4.444 4.444 2.222 1.78 0.197 TEBAL SU*DOSIS KA 4 10.454 10.454 2.614 2.10 0.123 Error 18 22.436 22.436 1.246 Total 26 38.340 Unusual Observations for BK Obs BK Fit SE Fit Residual St Resid 16 85.5000 87.9433 0.6446 -2.4433 -2.68R 18 90.4300 87.9433 0.6446 2.4867 2.73R

112

Lampiran 9 Hasil analisis varian pengaruh dosis dan ketebalan media terhadap penyusutan kandungan bahan kering media

Analysis of Variance Procedure Class Level Information Class Levels Values Replican 3 1 2 3 A 3 1 2 3 B 3 1 2 3 Number of observations in data set = 27 Analysis of Variance Procedure Dependent Variable: PENYUSUTAN BAHAN KERING Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 8 20.43425185 2.55428148 217.69 0.0001 Error 18 0.21120000 0.01173333 Corrected Total 26 20.64545185 R-Square C.V. Root MSE PENYUSUTAN BK Mean 0.989770 4.955361 0.10832051 2.18592593 Source DF Anova SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F A 2 1.41656296 0.70828148 60.36 0.0001 B 2 14.59378519 7.29689259 621.89 0.0001 A*B 4 4.42390370 1.10597593 94.26 0.0001 Duncan's Multiple Range Test for variable: PENYUSUTAN BAHAN KERING Alpha= 0.05 df= 18 MSE= 0.011733 Number of Means 2 3 Critical Range .1073 .1126 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. Duncan Grouping Mean N A A 2.43111 9 1 B 2.24667 9 3 C 1.88000 9 2

113

Analysis of Variance Procedure Duncan's Multiple Range Test for variable: RESPONSE Alpha= 0.05 df= 18 MSE= 0.011733 Number of Means 2 3 Critical Range .1073 .1126 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. Duncan Grouping Mean N B A 3.06111 9 2 B 2.23444 9 3 C 1.26222 9 1 Level of Level of -----------RESPONSE---------- A B N Mean SD 1 1 3 1.41666667 0.01527525 1 2 3 3.52666667 0.09291573 1 3 3 2.35000000 0.06244998 2 1 3 0.95333333 0.05033223 2 2 3 2.08666667 0.08386497 2 3 3 2.60000000 0.06244998 3 1 3 1.41666667 0.02516611 3 2 3 3.57000000 0.26057628 3 3 3 1.75333333 0.10408330 Lampiran 10 Hasil analisis varian pengaruh dosis dan ketebalan media terhadap

kandungan Protein Kasar media Analysis of Variance Procedure Class Level Information Class Levels Values replication 3 1 2 3 A 3 1 2 3 B 3 1 2 3 Number of observations in data set = 27 Dependent Variable: Kandungan Protein Kasar Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 8 11.34289630 1.41786204 4.71 0.0031 Error 18 5.42380000 0.30132222 Corrected Total 26 16.76669630

114

R-Square C.V. Root MSE RESPONSE Mean 0.676513 2.301622 0.54892825 23.84962963 Source DF Anova SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F A 2 4.45791852 2.22895926 7.40 0.0045 B 2 6.18498519 3.09249259 10.26 0.0011 A*B 4 0.69999259 0.17499815 0.58 0.6804 Duncan's Multiple Range Test for variable: Kandungan Protein kasar Alpha= 0.05 df= 18 MSE= 0.301322 Number of Means 2 3 Critical Range 0.5436 0.5704 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. Duncan Grouping Mean N A A 24.3767 9 3 B 23.7844 9 2 B 23.3878 9 1 Duncan's Multiple Range Test for variable: Protein Kasar Alpha= 0.05 df= 18 MSE= 0.301322 Number of Means 2 3 Critical Range 0.5436 0.5704 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. Duncan Grouping Mean N B A 24.3033 9 2 A 24.0578 9 3 B 23.1878 9 1 Level of Level of -----------RESPONSE---------- A B N Mean SD 1 1 3 22.6300000 0.77155687 1 2 3 23.6466667 0.43408908 1 3 3 23.8866667 0.23501773 2 1 3 23.1600000 0.62553977 2 2 3 24.2466667 0.87323155 2 3 3 23.9466667 0.24214321 3 1 3 23.7733333 0.67337459 3 2 3 25.0166667 0.13316656 3 3 3 24.3400000 0.43508620

115

Lampiran 11 Hasil analisis varian pengaruh dosis dan ketebalan media terhadap

kandungan NDF media Analysis of Variance Procedure Class Level Information Class Levels Values Replication 3 1 2 3 A 3 1 2 3 B 3 1 2 3 Number of observations in data set = 27 Analysis of Variance Procedure Dependent Variable: NDF Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 8 330.20773333 41.27596667 27.26 0.0001 Error 18 27.25733333 1.51429630 Corrected Total 26 357.46506667 R-Square C.V. Root MSE NDF Mean 0.923748 1.904445 1.23056747 64.61555556 Source DF Anova SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F A 2 101.05646667 50.52823333 33.37 0.0001 B 2 95.95815556 47.97907778 31.68 0.0001 A*B 4 133.19311111 33.29827778 21.99 0.0001 Duncan's Multiple Range Test for variable: NDF Alpha= 0.05 df= 18 MSE= 1.514296 Number of Means 2 3 Critical Range 1.219 1.279 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. Duncan Grouping Mean N A A 66.2833 9 3 A 65.6600 9 1 B 61.9033 9 2 Level of Level of -----------RESPONSE NDF---------- A B N Mean SD 1 1 3 65.2633333 1.20864938 1 2 3 65.1733333 1.32428597

116

1 3 3 66.5433333 1.65001010 2 1 3 61.2100000 1.60221721 2 2 3 61.2933333 0.89745938 2 3 3 63.2066667 1.04025638 3 1 3 59.4133333 0.75857322 3 2 3 70.6833333 1.53265565 3 3 3 68.7533333 0.55895736 Lampiran 12 Hasil analisis varian pengaruh dosis dan ketebalan media terhadap

kandungan ADF media Analysis of Variance Procedure Class Level Information Class Levels Values Replicates 3 1 2 3 A 3 1 2 3 B 3 1 2 3 Number of observations in data set = 27 Analysis of Variance Procedure Dependent Variable: ADF Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 8 186.25247407 23.28155926 4.53 0.0037 Error 18 92.44880000 5.13604444 Corrected Total 26 278.70127407 R-Square C.V. Root MSE ADF Mean 0.668287 4.694512 2.26628428 48.27518519 Source DF Anova SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F A 2 32.57934074 16.28967037 3.17 0.0661 B 2 10.44058519 5.22029259 1.02 0.3817 A*B 4 143.23254815 35.80813704 6.97 0.0014 Duncan's Multiple Range Test for variable: ADF Alpha= 0.05 df= 18 MSE= 5.136044 Number of Means 2 3 Critical Range 2.244 2.355 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. Duncan Grouping Mean N B A 49.139 9 3 A 47.987 9 1 A 47.700 9 2

117

Level of Level of -----------RESPONSE ADF---------- A B N Mean SD 1 1 3 52.8700000 3.68370737 1 2 3 48.2533333 0.77886670 1 3 3 46.7433333 0.65002564 2 1 3 46.1033333 1.71884651 2 2 3 45.7400000 1.79407358 2 3 3 48.4033333 0.82682122 3 1 3 44.9866667 4.87542135 3 2 3 49.1066667 0.19655364 3 3 3 52.2700000 0.98000000 Lampiran 13 Hasil analisis varian pengaruh dosis dan ketebalan media terhadap

kandungan Hemiselulosa media Analysis of Variance Procedure Class Level Information Class Levels Values Replicates 3 1 2 3 A 3 1 2 3 B 3 1 2 3 Number of observations in data set = 27

Analysis of Variance Procedure Dependent Variable: HEMISELULOSA Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 8 168.09304630 21.01163079 3.83 0.0086 Error 18 98.86245000 5.49235833 Corrected Total 26 266.95549630 R-Square C.V. Root MSE HEMISELULOSA Mean 0.629667 14.34291 2.34357810 16.33962963 Source DF Anova SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F A 2 22.72269657 11.36134829 2.07 0.1554 B 2 79.82036296 39.91018148 7.27 0.0049 A*B 4 65.54998676 16.38749669 2.98 0.0472 Analysis of Variance Procedure Duncan's Multiple Range Test for variable: HEMISELULOSA Alpha= 0.05 df= 18 MSE= 5.492358 Number of Means 2 3 Critical Range 2.321 2.435

118

Means with the same letter are not significantly different. Duncan Grouping Mean N B A 18.014 9 2 A 17.029 9 3 B 13.976 9 1 Level of Level of -----------RESPONSE HEMISELULOSA---------- A B N Mean SD 1 1 3 12.3933333 2.97372382 1 2 2 17.3950000 0.92630988 1 3 3 19.8000000 1.21111519 2 1 3 15.1066667 1.42141948 2 2 3 15.5533333 0.91281616 2 3 3 14.8033333 1.02021240 3 1 3 14.4266667 4.46609822 3 2 4 20.1700000 3.11649376 3 3 3 16.4833333 0.53200877

119

Lampiran 14 Grafik kandungan mannan pada BIS

0 3.2 6.4 9.6 12.8 16.0Retention Time (Min)

0

546.8

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100%

Inte

nsity

BPI=>NR(2.00)

T3.9

T5.7

T9.1

T2.9

T4.6

Keterangan : LC MS –ESI pos ion Vol injection 20 ul Flo 1 ml/min Consentration : 2500 ppm Eluent MeOH+Water = 60 + 40 LC-MS : Mariner Biospectrometry LC: Perkin Elmer Series 200 System ESI (Electrospray Ionisation) Positive ion mode Kolom C18 (RP 18) Vydac Column length : 250 mm ID : 2 mm Particle size : 5 μm Operating by : Puspa D N Lotulung Pusat Penelitian Kimia - LIPI

120

Lampiran 15 Grafik kandungan mannan pada BISF

0 3.2 6.4 9.6 12.8 16.0Retention Time (Min)

0

458.6

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100%

Inte

nsity

BPI=>NR(2.00)

T5.7

T1.3

T3.4

T3.8


121

Lampiran 16 Grafik kandungan mannan pada feses BIS

0.5 2.3 4.1 5.9 7.7 9.5Retention Time (Min)

260.9

70

80

90

100

% In

tens

ity

BPI=>SM15=>NR(5.00)

T3.6


122

Lampiran 17 Grafik kandungan mannan pada feses BISF

0.15129 1.13270 2.11411 3.09552 4.07693 5.05834Retention Time (Min)

0

238.7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

% In

tens

ityBPI=>NR(2.00)

T4.1

T3.7


123

Lampiran 18 Nilai absorban yang terukur pada penentuan kurva standar gula

Standar gula (ppm) Nilai terukur pada spectrofotometer 0 0.093 10 0.127 20 0.297 30 0.364 40 0.506 50 0.661

Dari hasil pengukuran nilai standar gula diperoleh kurva standar Y = 0.0128x + 0.0077

dengan nilai r2 = 0.9857.

Lampiran 19 Data Deskriptif tentang DOC yang digunakan dalam penelitian

Nilai Keterangan DOC Ayam umur 7 hari

Jumlah Sampel 350 350 Rata-rata (g) 42.84 232.09 Nilai tengah (g) 42.793 217.7 Median (g) 43 233.6 Minimum (g) 40 185.1 Maksimum (g) 48 263.1 Standar deviasi (g) 1.753 19.39 Variance (g) 3.075 375.99 Koefisien variasi (%) 4.09 8.35

Lampiran 20 Pembandingan orthogonal yang digunakan dalam penelitian

Pembandingan Koefisien

R0 VS R1,R2,R3,R4,R5,R6 6 1 1 1 1 1 1

R1,R2,R3 VS R4,R5,R6 0 -1 -1 -1 1 1 1

BIS (R1, R2, R3)

Linier 0 -1 0 1 0 0 0

Kuadratik 0 -1 2 -1 0 0 0

BISF (R4, R5, R6)

Linier 0 0 0 0 -1 0 1

Kuadratik 0 0 0 0 -1 2 -1

124

Lampiran 21 Analisis varian dan uji kontras orthogonal konsumsi ransum ayam pedaging General Linear Models Procedure Class Level Information Class Levels Values PERLK 7 R0 R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 Number of observations in data set = 35 Dependent Variable: KONSUMSI PAKAN (KONPKN) Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 6 1863197.280 310532.880 45.04 0.0001 Error 28 193048.576 6894.592 Corrected Total 34 2056245.856 R-Square C.V. Root MSE KONPKN Mean 0.906 3.617 83.033 2295.480 Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F PERLK 6 1863197.280 310532.880 45.04 0.0001 Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F PERLK 6 1863197.280 310532.880 45.04 0.0001 Contrast DF Contrast SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F R0 VS R1,R2,R3,R4,R5,R6 1 669423.636 669423.636 97.09 0.0001 R1,R2,R3 VS R4,R5,R6 1 106302.721 106302.721 15.42 0.0005 BIS (R1, R2, R3) Linier 1 295152.400 295152.400 42.81 0.0001 Kuadratik 1 37495.745 37495.745 5.44 0.0271 BISF (R4, R5, R6) Linier 1 6692.569 6692.569 0.97 0.3329 Kuadratik 1 748130.208 748130.208 108.51 0.0001

125

Lampiran 22 Analisis varian dan uji kontras orthogonal pertambahan bobot badan ayam pedaging General Linear Models Procedure Dependent Variable: PERTAMBAHAN BOBOT BADAN (PBB) Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 6 761832.890 126972.148 17.46 0.0001 Error 28 203653.650 7273.345 Corrected Total 34 965486.540 R-Square C.V. Root MSE PBB Mean 0.789 6.346 85.284 1343.820 Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F PERLK 6 761832.890 126972.148 17.46 0.0001 Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F PERLK 6 761832.890 126972.148 17.46 0.0001 Contrast DF Contrast SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F R0 VS R1,R2,R3,R4,R5,R6 1 269845.103 269845.103 37.10 0.0001 R1,R2,R3 VS R4,R5,R6 1 64423.722 64423.722 8.86 0.0060 BIS (R1, R2, R3) Linier 1 200137.609 200137.609 27.52 0.0001 Kuadratik 1 43739.008 43739.008 6.01 0.0207 BISF (R4, R5, R6) Linier 1 67089.205 67089.205 9.22 0.0051 Kuadratik 1 116598.243 116598.243 16.03 0.0004 Lampiran 23 Analisis varian dan uji kontras orthogonal bobot akhir ayam pedaging General Linear Models Procedure Dependent Variable: BOBOT AKHIR (BAKH) Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 6 848807.695 141467.949 20.24 0.0001 Error 28 195659.052 6987.823 Corrected Total 34 1044466.747

126

R-Square C.V. Root MSE BAKH Mean 0.813 5.663 83.593 1476.075 Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F PERLK 6 848807.695 141467.949 20.24 0.0001 Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F PERLK 6 848807.695 141467.949 20.24 0.0001 Contrast DF Contrast SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F R0 VS R1,R2,R3,R4,R5,R6 1 260411.990 260411.990 37.27 0.0001 R1,R2,R3 VS R4,R5,R6 1 94086.222 94086.222 13.46 0.0010 BIS (R1, R2, R3) Linier 1 215763.457 215763.457 30.88 0.0001 Kuadratik 1 47785.130 47785.130 6.84 0.0142 BISF (R4, R5, R6) Linier 1 74641.920 74641.920 10.68 0.0029 Kuadratik 1 156118.976 156118.976 22.34 0.0001 Lampiran 24 Analisis varian dan uji kontras orthogonal konversi ransum ayam pedaging General Linear Models Procedure Dependent Variable: KONVERSI RANSUM (KONVER) Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 6 0.180 0.030 2.69 0.0342 Error 28 0.311 0.011 Corrected Total 34 0.491 R-Square C.V. Root MSE KONVER Mean 0.366 6.194 0.105 1.702 Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F PERLK 6 0.180 0.030 2.69 0.0342 Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F PERLK 6 0.180 0.030 2.69 0.0342

127

Contrast DF Contrast SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F R0 VS R1&R2&R3&R4&R5&R6 1 0.000462 0.000462 0.04 0.8399 R1&R2&R3 VS R4&R5&R6 1 0.048649 0.048649 4.38 0.0456 R1 VS R3 Linier 1 0.043551 0.043551 3.92 0.0576 Kuadratik 1 0.022965 0.022965 2.07 0.1616 R4 VS R6 Linier 1 0.031331 0.031331 2.82 0.1043 Kuadratik 1 0.032666 0.032666 2.94 0.0975 Lampiran 25 Analisis varian dan uji kontras orthogonal mortalitas ayam pedaging General Linear Models Procedure Dependent Variable: MORTALITAS (MORTAL) Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 6 74.286 12.381 1.73 0.1501 Error 28 200.000 7.143 Corrected Total 34 274.286 R-Square C.V. Root MSE MORTAL Mean 0.271 311.805 2.673 0.857 Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F PERLK 6 74.286 12.381 1.73 0.1501 Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F PERLK 6 74.286 12.381 1.73 0.1501 Contrast DF Contrast SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F R0 VS R1,R2,R3,R4,R5,R6 1 57.619 57.619 8.07 0.0083 R1,R2,R3 VS R4,R5,R6 1 3.333 3.333 0.47 0.5001 BIS (R1, R2, R3) Linier 1 0.000 0.000 0.00 1.0000 Kuadratik 1 0.000 0.000 0.00 1.0000 BISF (R4, R5, R6) Linier 1 10.000 10.000 1.40 0.2467 Kuadratik 1 3.333 3.333 0.47 0.5001

128

Lampiran 26 Analisis varian dan uji kontras orthogonal persentase karkas ayam pedaging General Linear Models Procedure Dependent Variable: PERSENTASE KARKAS (PERKAS) Source DF Sum of Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 6 194.008 32.335 7.78 0.0001 Error 28 116.430 4.158 Corrected Total 34 310.439 R-Square C.V. Root MSE PERKAS Mean 0.625 2.824 2.039 72.201 Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F PERLK 6 194.008 32.335 7.78 0.0001 Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F PERLK 6 194.008 32.335 7.78 0.0001 Contrast DF Contrast SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F R0 VS R1,R2,R3,R4,R5,R6 1 71.074 71.074 17.09 0.0003 R1,R2,R3 VS R4,R5,R6 1 38.692 38.692 9.30 0.0050 BIS (R1, R2, R3) Linier 1 35.269 35.269 8.48 0.0070 Kuadratik 1 0.123 0.123 0.03 0.8647 BISF (R4, R5, R6) Linier 1 22.380 22.380 5.38 0.0279 Kuadratik 1 26.470 26.470 6.37 0.0176

129

Lampiran 27 Rataan IOFCC (Rp) ayam pedaging umur 7-42 hari

Perlakuan Uraian R0 R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6

Harga DOC (Rp/kg)

1 100 1 100 1 100 1 100 1 100 1 100 1 100

Harga ransum (Rp/kg)

3 434.95

3 334.95

3 279.95

3 209.95

3 399.95

3 377.45

3 339.95

Rataan konsumsi (kg/ekor)

2.634 2.315 2.250 1.972 2.166 2.614 2.114

Biaya konsumsi ransum (Rp)

9 047.66 7 720.41 7 379.89 6 330.02 7 364.29 8 828.65 7 060.65

Biaya konsumsi ransum+ DOC (Rp)

10 147.66 8 820.41 8 479,89 7 430.02 8 464.29 9 928.65 8 160.65

Rataan bobot hidup (kg/ekor)

1.687 1.491 1.464 1.198 1.511 1.641 1.338

Harga ayam (Rp/kg)

10 700 10 700 10 700 10 700 10 700 10 700 10 700

Hasil penjualan (Rp/ekor)

18 050.9 15 953.7 15 664.8 12 818.6 16 167.7 17 558.7 14 316.6

IOFCC (Rp/kg) 7 903.24 7 133.29 7 184.91 5 388.6 7 703.4 7 630.1 6 155.9

Documents

Peningkatan Kualitas Bungkil Inti Sawit oleh Kapang ...repository.ipb.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/40575/BAB VII... · 100 Farel DJ. 1974. General Principles and Assumtion of