18
Peer to Peer Lending in the UK Christine Farnish CBE Chairman Peer-to-Peer Finance Association www.p2pfa.info July 2016

Peer to Peer Lending in the UK - LendIt Conference Blogblog.lendit.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Christine... · 2018. 8. 13. · • P2P lending defined as “operating an electronic

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Peer to Peer Lending
 in the UKChristine Farnish CBE

    Chairman Peer-to-Peer Finance Association

    www.p2pfa.info July 2016

    http://www.p2pfa.info

  • What is it?

    • internet-based digital p2p lending

    • new type of retail financial service •NOT banking •NOT asset management•NOT equity investment •NOT insurance

    • debt-based finance to consumers or SMEs via direct peer-to-peer contracts

  • p2p platform

    lenders credit worthy borrowers

    platform manages risk on behalf of

    consumers

    direct legal contract

  • 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

    Timeline

    Zopa

    Funding Circle & RateSetter

    P2PFA & self regulation

    New law defining p2p as a discrete financial services

    activity

    FCA began authorising platforms. Tax reforms announced

    FCA review of regime

  • UK vs US

    Both big, fast growing p2p lending markets but…

    UK US

    ~60-70% retail consumer funded

    ~20% retail consumer funded

    direct peer-to-peer loan contracts

    complex contractual arrangement

    involving third parties

    bespoke regulatory regime

    no bespoke regulatory regime

  • UK alternative finance market 2015 


    Source: Pushing Boundaries, The 2015 UK alternative Finance Industry Report Feb 2016, Nesta, University of Cambridge

  • Cumulative lending

  • Benefits

    • access for all – ‘democratic’

    • lower cost

    • faster, better customer service

    • disintermediation and better economic efficiency

    • dynamic benefits from competition and innovation

  • Risk profile 


    bank deposits

    high risklow risk

    p2p lending equity investment

    (including equity crowdfunding)

  • Risks

    Risk Mitigation

    loan defaults and capital loss▪ sound debt recovery processes ▪ honest, clear, effective disclosure ▪ robust credit risk underwriting

    fraud ▪ client money safeguards ▪ sound systems and controlsinsolvency ▪ robust independent run-off plans

    liquidity/ access to funds ▪ honest disclosure ▪ development of secondary market

    incompetence/mistakes▪ senior management responsibilities ▪ complaints handling systems ▪ Ombudsman

  • New 2015 P2PFA requirements

    • headline returns to be shown net of defaults and fees

    • standardised methodology for default calculation and mandatory default disclosure

    • full loan book transparency

    • no discrimination between retail and wholesale investors

    • no raising of ‘own funds’ on p2p platforms

  • UK statutory regulation

    • P2P lending defined as “operating an electronic system in relation to lending”

    • FCA Rules: – clear, honest, balanced and not misleading marketing and

    platform information – robust systems and controls – client money safeguards – sound, independent run-off plans – c£50k prudential capital – complaints systems and Ombudsman cover

    • FCA review of regime H2 2016

  • Tax

    • Investors were taxed on expected returns (i.e gross of defaults and fees)

    • bad debt relief now implemented

    • lender fees still cannot be offset

    • p2p loans now fall within Personal Saving Allowance

    • p2p loans to be included in Innovative Finance ISA

  • Brexit

    • period of economic and political uncertainty

    • macro economic consequences

    • no single EU market for p2p

    • little cross border business

    • fundamental economic and commercial advantages of p2p lending remain the same

  • FCA Review of crowdfunding regulation

    • investor information and understanding?

    • credit risk underwriting?

    • resilience to economic shocks?

    • impact on competition?

    Outcome early 2017

  • Conclusion • significant economic and customer benefits

    • regulatory framework needed, but…

    • …needs to be proportionate and not kill innovative, beneficial business models

    • regulation should address specific risks to consumers

    • regime needs to be dynamic