Procurement Evaluation and Re-Engineering Team (PERT)

Peer Reviews

2010 Peer Reviews

2

FY2010

Review Site

Savannah River M & O

Los Alomos National Security

Lawrence Berkeley National

Laboratory

Princeton Plasma Physics

Laboratory

Brookhaven National

Laboratory

National Renewable

Energy Laboratory

CH2M Hill Plateau

Remediation Contract (PRC)

Office of River Protection

(Tank Operations)

Dates June 21-25   June 14-18 June 21-25 July 12-16 May 17-21 May 17-21 April 19-23Team Lead

Gere Jester - Pantex

John Robinson -

ORP

Sonny Rogers - ORNL

Jerome Hicks - ORNL

Joe Ingraffia - ANL

Rod Templon - PPPL

John Robinson -

ORP

Pat Marmo- PRC

                 

TeamCheryl

Thompson -DOE/HQ

Ceceila Rowe - ORNL

Tony Guadagni -

BNL

Kelly Miller - LLNL

Gary Romero SNL

Mike Allen - KCP

Mike McGrath - BNL

Anne Frankowski -

ANL

 Karl Duke -

ANLBarbara Stearrett

NNSA/NA-63

Evelyn Landini - BHSO

Patrick Schurott NREL

Imogene Manuelito

NREL

Mike Hill -DOE/CH-ACQ

Doug Akers - PNNL

Don Rawlings - BNL

 Al Kong -

SLACCarol Elliott

NNSA/SRSOJoe Ingraffia -

ANLCarolyn Lucas

- KCPDave

Ferguson - DOE/SSO

Mary-Faith Healey - BNL

Chad Venable - Pantex

Martha Youngblood-

DOE

 Dick Martello -

ANLLaura Hughes

- NRELLorri Wilkins -

DOE/HQDavid Chen -

LBLAndrea R.

Melius - PNLLeticia Potts -

DOE/ALJoe Ingraffia -

ANL

 Carolyn Lucas

- KCPBob Lenahan

- BNLSteve Law -

NNSA  Neil Cagle

DynMcDermott

Heather Merrill -INL

Vicki Worthington-

ANL

 

 Vanessa

Everhart - Pantex

Bill Peters - SNL

  Dan Saiz - NNSA SC

     

         Joe Collins -

FNAL     

  

Contractor - DOE

Contractor- NNSA

Federal - NNSA

Federal - DOE     

ALTERNATES              

Strengths◦ Advanced Procurement Planning◦ Small Business Outreach◦ Robust Training Programs Customers◦ Succession Planning◦ Self Assessment Processes◦ Corrective Actions in Response to Lessons Learned and

Findings from Prior PEER Reviews

Weaknesses◦ File Documentation◦ Cost and Price Analysis ◦ Lack of Resources (personnel)

2010 Peer Review Trends

3

2010 Peer Review Trends

Best Practice◦ Contractor Labor Time Reporting (CTLR) System◦ Purchasing System Policies: Requirements of Prime

Contract, Applicable Laws, Regulations◦ Relationship with Subcontractors and Suppliers◦ System in Place to Prevent the Award of a

Construction Subcontract to the A&E Company or Affiliate Who Prepared the Design

4

2009 Review Trends◦ Strengths - Rapid Purchasing Techniques, Advanced Procurement

Planning, Use of Technology for Efficiency, Small Business Outreach, Robust training programs customers

◦ Best Practices - Use of Technology for Efficiency: Ariba electronic workflow requisition, Open Rating’ database, Advanced Procurement Plan (APP). NSE Roof Asset Management Program contract (RAMP)

◦ Weaknesses - File Documentation, Cost and Price Analysis

------------------------------------------------------------------------

2009, 2008, and 2007 Peer Review Comparisons

2007 Review Trendso Strengths and Best Practices

i Use of technologyi Controls for rapid purchasingi Socioeconomic outreachi Special purchasing techniquesi Vendor quality recognition

programi Subcontract Technical

Representative programi Small Business outreach

o Weaknessesi Cost reimbursement/time and

material contracts lack justification

i Exclusive use of FFPi No vendor rating systemi Application of rating not

evident

2008 Review Trends◦ Strengths and Best Practices

Leveraged Buying Power Rapid Purchasing Techniques

Strategic sourcing Advanced Procurement Planning Subcontractor Performance

Evaluation Systems Use of Technology for Efficiency:

Electronic Certified Payroll, Contract Audit System

Robust Assessment Programs Customer Feedback for Continuous Improvement

Small Business Outreach Acquisition Process Internal Cost/Price Analysis Teams

◦ Weaknesses No Trended Weaknesses

5

Observation Comparison FY06-FY09

FY07 FY08 FY09 FY100

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Best PracticesStrengthsWeaknesses

6

FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10Best Practices 4 5 5 6Strengths 50 82 65 43Weaknesses 54 19 19 25