24
Trusted evidence. Informed decisions. Better health. Peer review for Cochrane Reviews John Hilton, Bryony Urquhart, Harriet MacLehose, Sally Bell-Syer, Monaz Mehta, Sera Tort Cochrane Editorial Unit

Peer review for Cochrane Reviews presentation JH V32016.colloquium.cochrane.org/sites/2016.colloquium... · 2016-11-16 · Cochrane Reviews John Hilton, Bryony Urquhart, Harriet MacLehose

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Trusted evidence.Informed decisions.Better health.

    PeerreviewforCochraneReviewsJohnHilton,BryonyUrquhart,HarrietMacLehose,SallyBell-Syer,MonazMehta,SeraTort

    CochraneEditorialUnit

  • Disclosures of conflicts of interest

    JohnHilton,BryonyUrquhart,HarrietMacLehose,SallyBell-Syer,MonazMehta,SeraTort

    EmployedbyCochrane

  • Overview

    • Background:Why?How?When?

    • Policydevelopmentprocess

    • Whatthepolicycovers

    • Somekeyareasofpolicy

    • ReviewGroupsurvey

    • What’snext

    • What’shappeninginpeerreview?

  • Background• CochraneEditorialUnitsupportsCochraneReviewGroups,andworks

    toimprovequalityandtheCochraneLibrary

    • CRGShavepolicies,butnoCochrane-widepolicyonpeerreview• Policytobesupplementedwithsupportingguidance• Peerreviewisahottopic:isitdoomedorthriving?

  • Whydoweneedapolicy?

    FORPEER-REVIEWERS

    Toprovideaframeworkforpeer-reviewersworkingacrossCRGs.

    FORUSERS

    ToprovideclarityaboutCochrane’speerreviewprocess,bothingeneralandforspecificreviews.

    FOREDITORIALTEAMS

    Toprovideclearexpectations,standardsandguidanceformanagingthepeerreviewprocess.

    FORAUTHORS

    ToprovideclarityaroundthepeerreviewprocessforauthorsembarkingonaCochraneReview.

  • What’sdifferentaboutCochrane?• ‘Peerreferee’versus‘peerreview’

    • Consumers

    • MultipleReviewGroups

    • Peerreviewnotusuallyaccept/reject

    • CochraneReviewsandlongandcomplex

    • Evidence-based

    Butingeneralthesameprinciplesandsamechallengesasfacedbyauthors,editorsandpeerreviewerseverywhere.

  • Editorialpolicydevelopment

    Topicidentified Smallworkinggroup

    Advisorygroup

    Execs Sign-offandEPPR

  • Peer review policy developmentWorkshop

    DraftpolicydevelopmentAdvisoryGroupformation

    PolicyrevisionSurvey

    DraftpolicycompletedConsultation

    Revision,Sign-off,PublicationCommunicationImplementation

    Audit

    Oct 2015

    Nov 2016

  • What’sincluded

    • Typeofpeerreview

    • Numberandexpertiseofpeerreviewers

    • Declarationsofinterestforpeerreviewers

    • Acknowledgementandcreditforpeerreviewers

    • Peerreviewturnaroundtime

    • Ensuringthatauthorsaddressreviewers’comments

    • Feedbacktopeerreviewers

    • Invitingpeerreviewerstobeauthors

    • Editorialroles

  • What’sincluded(continued)

    • Peerreviewchecklists

    • Peerreviewerconductandethics

    • Conflictresolution

    • ReviewGrouppeerreviewpoliciesandprocedures

    • Researchintopeerreview

    • PLUSsupportingguidance

  • What’snotincluded

    • Post-publicationpeerreview

    • Open(published)peerreview

  • Open (named) peer reviewShouldpeerreviewersidentitiesbeknowntoauthorsandotherpeerreviewers?

    PROS CONS

    Transparency Somereluctance

    Openscience Lesshonest

    Lessone-sided Biases(+and-)

    Betterreviews? Blandreviews?

    Interestsexposed Reluctance

    Evidence?

    Limitedandseemstovarybetweenjournalsandsettings.

  • Reviewers:howmanyreviewersandwhatexpertise?

    • Atleastoneclinical/topicspecialist,withaminimumofoneexternaltotheCRG.

    • PLUSonestatistician/methodologist(ifthereviewdeviatesfromstandardmethodsorusescomplexmethods).

    • Aimtoinclude(ifrelevant)atleastoneconsumer(oruser)peerreviewer

  • Peerreviewofupdates• Fullorselectivepeerreview?• Alwaysneedpeerreview?• What’schanged?

    >>Decisionflowchart

  • Publishedpeerreviewpolicies

  • Survey of Review Groups• Informimplementationofnewpolicy• Helptoidentifywhereadditionalguidancewouldhelp• Sharebestpractice• Informfuturepolicydevelopment

    50ReviewGroupsresponded.

  • Survey:summaryoffindings• AllCRGscarryoutpeerreview;abouthalfhaveadocumented

    policy

    • Open(named)peerreviewiscommonlyused

    • MostCRGsusethestandardCochranepeerreviewforms,oramodifiedversion

    • MostCRGspublishthenamesoftheirpeerreviewers

    • Feedbackisoftenprovidedtopeerreviewers;opportunityforfurtherincentives

    • Themostchallengingaspectsofpeerreviewrelatetotime:gettingreviewerstorespondtotheinvitation,thetimeittakespeerreviewerstoreturncomments,findingspecialistpeerreviewers,andoverallthetimeittakestoorganisepeerreview.

  • ImplementationPublish &

    communicate

    Support

    Monitor, feedback &

    audit

    Additional support or

    modify policy

    Policy updates

  • What’snext?Draftpolicyfinalisation

    Policyconsultation,viaReviewGroupExecutives

    Policyrevision andsign-off

    CochraneEditorialandPublishingandPolicyResourceupdatedandcommunicated

    Webinars,presentations,guidance

    Planformonitoring,auditandfeedback

  • SupportingguidanceHowtofindpeerreviewers

    Howtokeeppeerreviewers

    Howtoimprovequalityofpeerreviews

    Howtospeeduppeerreview

    Howtoinvolveconsumersandusers

    Howtohandleethicalissues

    Introducingnewpeerreviewprocesses

    Managingfeedback

  • Opportunities for research! Within groups; between groups; comparing with non-Cochrane

    Research

  • Thankyou

    PeerReviewAdvisoryGroup:

    DeirdreBeecher,RuthBrassingtonChrisEccleston,KarenRobinsonSusanWieland,CarolineStruthersMelinaWillson,RichardWormald

    CRGstaffwhorespondedtothesurvey

  • Monument to an anonymous peer reviewer

    https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/972533097/monument-to-an-anonymous-peer-reviewer/description