36
Pedagogy Luther Tychonievich Some slides borrowed from: Joanne McGrath Cohoon David F Feldon Colby Tofel-Grehl Camilo Vieira 1

Pedagogy

  • Upload
    dobry

  • View
    32

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Pedagogy. Luther Tychonievich Some slides borrowed from: Joanne McGrath Cohoon David F Feldon Colby Tofel-Grehl Camilo Vieira. Understanding Learning. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Pedagogy

PedagogyLuther Tychonievich

Some slides borrowed from:Joanne McGrath Cohoon

David F FeldonColby Tofel-Grehl

Camilo Vieira1

Page 2: Pedagogy

2

Understanding Learning“I try to understand how to help students learn.

That is at least as complex as how plants grow,

the properties of and reactions between chemicals, and the ways in which interplanetary bodies interact.”

— Jack Wilkinson

“It is likely that one can teach (even teach well) without understanding learning. Doing without understanding the doing is common.”

— J. Phillip East

Page 3: Pedagogy

3

This Talk• Two Truths• One Theory• Practices as time allows

Page 4: Pedagogy

4

This Talk• Two Truths• One Theory• Practices as time allows

Page 5: Pedagogy

5

Two Truths• By “truth” I mean – consensus of existing research –without well-conducted study with

contrary findings (of which I am aware)

Page 6: Pedagogy

6

Two Truths• Learning styles do not matter– Preferences exist; but preference-targeted

instruction does not improve learning outcomes(Kavale & Forness, 1987; Loo, 1997 ; Stahl, 1999; Richardson, 2000; Duff & Duffy, 2002; Henson & Hwang, 2002; Coffield et al., 2004, Massa & Mayer, 2006; Pashler et al., 2009)– Varied instruction is generally a good idea

• Discovery learning does not enhance learning– Confused, overwhelmed, and less motivated– Successful discovery- and non-discovery-taught

students perform similarly on later tasks(Tuovinen & Sweller, 1999; Mayer, 2004; Klahr & Nigam, 2004; Kirschner et al., 2006; Alfieri et al., 2011)

Page 7: Pedagogy

7

Two Truths• Learning styles do not matter– Preferences exist; but preference-targeted

instruction does not improve learning outcomes(Kavale & Forness, 1987; Loo, 1997 ; Stahl, 1999; Richardson, 2000; Duff & Duffy, 2002; Henson & Hwang, 2002; Coffield et al., 2004, Massa & Mayer, 2006; Pashler et al., 2009)– Varied instruction is generally a good idea

• Discovery learning does not enhance learning– Confused, overwhelmed, and less motivated– Successful discovery- and non-discovery-taught

students perform similarly on later tasks(Tuovinen & Sweller, 1999; Mayer, 2004; Klahr & Nigam, 2004; Kirschner et al., 2006; Alfieri et al., 2011)

Page 8: Pedagogy

8

Two Truths• Learning styles do not matter– Preferences exist; but preference-targeted

instruction does not improve learning outcomes(Kavale & Forness, 1987; Loo, 1997 ; Stahl, 1999; Richardson, 2000; Duff & Duffy, 2002; Henson & Hwang, 2002; Coffield et al., 2004, Massa & Mayer, 2006; Pashler et al., 2009)– Varied instruction is generally a good idea

• Discovery learning does not enhance learning– Confused, overwhelmed, and less motivated– Successful discovery- and non-discovery-taught

students perform similarly on later tasks(Tuovinen & Sweller, 1999; Mayer, 2004; Klahr & Nigam, 2004; Kirschner et al., 2006; Alfieri et al., 2011)

Page 9: Pedagogy

9

Two Truths• Learning styles do not matter– Preferences exist; but preference-targeted

instruction does not improve learning outcomes(Kavale & Forness, 1987; Loo, 1997 ; Stahl, 1999; Richardson, 2000; Duff & Duffy, 2002; Henson & Hwang, 2002; Coffield et al., 2004, Massa & Mayer, 2006; Pashler et al., 2009)– Varied instruction is generally a good idea

• Discovery learning does not enhance learning– Confused, overwhelmed, and less motivated– Successful discovery- and non-discovery-taught

students perform similarly on later tasks(Tuovinen & Sweller, 1999; Mayer, 2004; Klahr & Nigam, 2004; Kirschner et al., 2006; Alfieri et al., 2011)

Page 10: Pedagogy

10

This Talk• Two Truths• One Theory• Practices as time allows

Page 11: Pedagogy

11

This Talk• Two Truths• One Theory• Practices as time allows

Page 12: Pedagogy

12

Cognitive Load Theory• Your brain has– Sensory memory (I/O Buffers)–Working memory (Register file)– Long-term memory (RAM/Storage)

Page 13: Pedagogy

13

Long-Term Memory• Hierarchical and contextual• Unlimited capacity and durability• Retrieval decays with disuse, improves

with practice• We store– Schema (relationships between

categories of information)– Procedures– Episodes

Page 14: Pedagogy

14

Working Memory• Intrinsic load–Can’t add without two operands

• Extraneous load– Parsing input given into task at hand–Distractions

• Germane load–Creating associations with existing

knowledge– Linking schema with other schemata

Page 15: Pedagogy

15

Using Space Well• Working memory requirements decrease

for–Organized knowledge– Practiced skills

• Habits are unconscious (no space used)

Page 16: Pedagogy

16

Many Things Waste Space:• Redundant or irrelevant information–Names, stories, connections to real world–Organization not yet understood

• Unclear presentation• Unrelated noise or activity–Windows, pets, screen savers,

decorations, instructor ticks, other students, …

• Anxiety, stress, pressure to perform

Page 17: Pedagogy

17

When Space Exceeded• Miss details (I/O packets dropped)• Revert to habit (which take no space)– Includes habits of categorizing input–Often changes procedures and goals

Page 18: Pedagogy

18

Ergo What?• Present new information from simple

(cognitively small) to complex (cognitively large)

• Repeatedly practice new skills in simple situations before applying them in context

• Do not present unnecessary information– Including application or flavor–At least not until skill on its way to habit

• Make use of existing habits only if they work unmodified

Page 19: Pedagogy

19

This Talk• Two Truths• One Theory• Practices as time allows

Page 20: Pedagogy

20

This Talk• Two Truths• One Theory• Practices as time allows

Page 21: Pedagogy

21

Pair Programming• Two minds, one focus (works in any field)• Requires coaching and supervision• Many studies on pair selection; no consensus–Often opposite methods both have support

• I show http://y2u.be/rG_U12uqRhE from 3:55 to 7:55– Especially 5:36 and 6:13

• You’ll have more on this in a few weeks

Page 22: Pedagogy

22

Partially Worked Examples• Helps learn material without cognitive

load spent learning the goal of the material

• The Use-Modify-Create pattern most self-taught programmers adopt instinctively

• Shown particularly effective for novice- and intermediate-level students

• Throttles addition of challenge, reducing anxiety

Page 23: Pedagogy

23

Instruction/Practice Loop• In a tight loop,– Teach a small step–Work examples– Practice–Repeat

• Lecture + worksheet not effective: work examples, provide feedback on practice

Page 24: Pedagogy

24

Work ≠ Practice• Teach how to approach the problems• Model the solution process• Have students rephrase, elaborate, and

summarize• Remove scaffolding slowly• Don’t practice incorrect processes–Observe work; back up if misunderstood

• Don’t move on until at least 80% success

Page 25: Pedagogy

25

Begin with Review• Daily review as the opening to a lesson– Strengthens recall–Reinforces correct schemata–Repairs incorrectly-stored information– Shrinks cognitive size of important

concepts

Page 26: Pedagogy

26

Weekly and Monthly Review• Review not only daily, but also weekly and

monthly–Builds recall skills– Links concepts together in student mind–Compresses concepts for easier use

Page 27: Pedagogy

27

Ask Many Questions• In general, more questions is better• Questions should– Engage all students–Contribute to learning–Be answerable and safe to answer

• Avoid the Same Three People phenomenon– Pairing, writing, polling, etc.

Page 28: Pedagogy

28

Question Templates• How are __________ and __________ alike?• What is the main idea of __________?• What are the strengths and weaknesses of __________?• In what way is __________ related to __________?• Compare __________ and __________ with regard to __________.• What do you think causes __________?• How does __________ tie in with what we have learned before?• Which one is the best __________, and why?• What are some possible solutions for the problem of __________?• Do you agree or disagree with this statement: __________?• What do you still not understand about __________?• What is a question others might have about __________?

Page 29: Pedagogy

29

Intellect Grows• IQ is a snapshot, not a destiny• Our brains, like our muscles, get stronger

by working through challenges• Think and speak in terms of diligence and

work, not ability and gift• Particularly important if externalities label

student as “not right” for the field

Page 30: Pedagogy

30

Self Affirmation• Students who are given a chance to affirm

their own values are less impacted by the pressures around them

• Some studies show that a single exercise writing a paragraph about–What you value–Why it is important to you– That you try to live up to these valuesreduced stereotype threat for two years

Page 31: Pedagogy

31

Neither Condemn nor Condone

• Have the same high standard for all students

• Give feedback that identifies areas for improvement

• Be specific on how to achieve the standards

• Express confidence that student can achieve that improvement

Page 32: Pedagogy

32

Inhibit Grandstanding• Known: grandstanding is a problem• Unknown: best ways to discourage it• Ideas?

Page 33: Pedagogy

33

Give Encouragement• http://y2u.be/_gQ84-vWNGU

Page 34: Pedagogy

34

Engaging Examples• Students focus more and learn faster if

they care• Ask them what they care about– Either generally, then design applicable

examples and assignments–Or specifically about a menu of possible

examples• Unclear how much impact this has…

Page 35: Pedagogy

35

Odds and Ends• Ability to rotate 2D and 3D images in your

head is positively correlated with CS performance; increasing rotation skills increases CS too

• Offer encouragement and hope, not sympathy

• Praise process, not person (no helpful sentence begins with the words “you are”)

• Tie new topic to interests, but don’t do so during learning new topic (it’s extraneous mental load)