20
Pebble Project Pebble Project Geochemical Geochemical Characterization Characterization Stephen Day Stephen Day Claire Linklater Claire Linklater SRK Consulting SRK Consulting November 27, 2007 November 27, 2007 Anchorage Anchorage Day1_1415_SRK_Day.mp3

Pebble Project Geochemical Characterization Stephen Day Claire Linklater SRK Consulting November 27, 2007 Anchorage

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Pebble Project Geochemical Characterization Stephen Day Claire Linklater SRK Consulting November 27, 2007 Anchorage

Pebble ProjectPebble ProjectGeochemical Geochemical

CharacterizationCharacterizationStephen DayStephen Day

Claire LinklaterClaire LinklaterSRK ConsultingSRK Consulting

November 27, 2007November 27, 2007AnchorageAnchorage

Day1_1415_SRK_Day.mp3

Page 2: Pebble Project Geochemical Characterization Stephen Day Claire Linklater SRK Consulting November 27, 2007 Anchorage

Geology MapGeology MapEach dot is a drill hole

Page 3: Pebble Project Geochemical Characterization Stephen Day Claire Linklater SRK Consulting November 27, 2007 Anchorage

Geological Cross-SectionGeological Cross-Section

Page 4: Pebble Project Geochemical Characterization Stephen Day Claire Linklater SRK Consulting November 27, 2007 Anchorage

Geology (Cretaceous)Geology (Cretaceous)

Page 5: Pebble Project Geochemical Characterization Stephen Day Claire Linklater SRK Consulting November 27, 2007 Anchorage

2007 Program Objectives2007 Program Objectives

• Continue characterization of West Zone.

• Characterization of East Zone.

• Evaluate leaching under non-acidic conditions from Tertiary rocks

• Characterization of tailings produced in 2007 from East Zone.

Page 6: Pebble Project Geochemical Characterization Stephen Day Claire Linklater SRK Consulting November 27, 2007 Anchorage

West Zone in 2007West Zone in 2007

• In-fill drilling for exploration.• Ongoing rock humidity cells (up to 2.5

years).– Two Cretaceous– Seven Tertiary

• Four ongoing rock subaqueous columns (2 years).

• Two ongoing low-sulfide tailings columns and two humidity cells (2.5 years).

Page 7: Pebble Project Geochemical Characterization Stephen Day Claire Linklater SRK Consulting November 27, 2007 Anchorage

East ZoneEast ZoneSample selection – Static TestworkSample selection – Static Testwork

• Criteria designed to ensure samples covered range in:– Rock type– Spatial variability– Geochemical characteristics (sulfur, metal content).– Calcium used as a surrogate for neutralization potential.

• Cretaceous (200 samples)– 180 samples below copper equivalent of 0.6%.– 20 samples above copper equivalent of 0.6%.

• Tertiary (200 samples) – bimodal sulfur distribution– 180 representing typical sulfur content.– 20 representing higher sulfur content (>1%).

Page 8: Pebble Project Geochemical Characterization Stephen Day Claire Linklater SRK Consulting November 27, 2007 Anchorage

0.001

0.01

0.1

1

10

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Cumulative Percentage

Sul

fur

(%)

n = 3766

Sulfur in East Zone Tertiary RocksSulfur in East Zone Tertiary Rocks

Page 9: Pebble Project Geochemical Characterization Stephen Day Claire Linklater SRK Consulting November 27, 2007 Anchorage

East ZoneEast ZoneSample selection – Kinetic TestworkSample selection – Kinetic Testwork

• Humidity Cells– Subset of samples studied in static testwork

program• 12 Cretaceous • 11 Tertiary

– Samples selected by:• Ranking dataset according to sulfide-S content• For each lithology, selected samples with (i) low,

(ii) average, (iii) high, and (iv) highest sulfide-S content

Page 10: Pebble Project Geochemical Characterization Stephen Day Claire Linklater SRK Consulting November 27, 2007 Anchorage

Confirmation of Analytical Surrogates Confirmation of Analytical Surrogates Used to Select Samples (Cretaceous)Used to Select Samples (Cretaceous)

0.0001

0.001

0.01

0.1

1

10

100

0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100

NP/AP Indicated by Exploration Database Analysis for Calcium and Sulfur by ICP Analysis

Mea

sure

d N

P/A

P b

y A

cid

-Bas

e A

ccou

ntin

g

Dashed lines indicate NP/AP=2

Page 11: Pebble Project Geochemical Characterization Stephen Day Claire Linklater SRK Consulting November 27, 2007 Anchorage

Confirmation of Analytical Surrogates Confirmation of Analytical Surrogates Used to Select Samples (Tertiary)Used to Select Samples (Tertiary)

0.1

1

10

100

1000

0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10

Exploration Database Sulphur Content (%)

Mea

sure

d N

P/A

P b

y A

cid-

Bas

e A

ccou

ntin

g Dashed line indicates NP/AP=2

Page 12: Pebble Project Geochemical Characterization Stephen Day Claire Linklater SRK Consulting November 27, 2007 Anchorage

Acid-Base Accounting Results: Acid-Base Accounting Results: East Zone Cretaceous (I)East Zone Cretaceous (I)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100

NP/AP

Pa

ste

pH

Diorite

Granodiorite

Porphyritic monzodiorite to granodiorite

Wacke, sandstone

Mudstone, siltstone

Fault affected material

Cretaceous Samples

Page 13: Pebble Project Geochemical Characterization Stephen Day Claire Linklater SRK Consulting November 27, 2007 Anchorage

Acid-Base Accounting Results: Acid-Base Accounting Results: East Zone Cretaceous (II)East Zone Cretaceous (II)

-50

-30

-10

10

30

50

70

90

110

130

150

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

AP, kg CaCO3/t

Mo

dif

ied

NP

, kg

CaC

O3/t

NP/AP=1

NP/AP=2

Diorite

Granodiorite

Porphyritic monzodiorite to granodiorite

Wacke, sandstone

Mudstone, siltstone

Fault affected material

Acid consuming

Uncertain potential

Potentially acid generating

Cretaceous Samples

Page 14: Pebble Project Geochemical Characterization Stephen Day Claire Linklater SRK Consulting November 27, 2007 Anchorage

Acid-Base Accounting Results: Acid-Base Accounting Results: East Zone TertiaryEast Zone Tertiary

-50

0

50

100

150

200

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

AP, kg CaCO3/t

Mo

dif

ied

NP

, kg

CaC

O3/t

NP/AP=1NP/AP=2Andesite, basaltConglomeratesDaciteMudstone, siltstone

Acid consuming

Uncertain potential

Potentially acid generating

Tertiary Samples

Page 15: Pebble Project Geochemical Characterization Stephen Day Claire Linklater SRK Consulting November 27, 2007 Anchorage

Comparison of AP results for East Comparison of AP results for East & West Zones& West Zones

• East Zone samples yielded lower AP values than West Zone 0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

Diorite Granodiorite Porphyr.monzo-

granodiorite

Wacke,sandstone

Mudstone,siltstone

Fault affectedmaterial

Sample Type

Rat

io o

f A

P v

alu

esP

ebb

le E

ast:

Peb

ble

Wes

t

Median Cretaceous Samples

Ratio = Unity

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

Sedimentary Volcanic

Sample Type

Ra

tio

of

AP

va

lue

sP

eb

ble

Ea

st:

Pe

bb

le W

es

t MedianTertiary Samples

Ratio = Unity

Page 16: Pebble Project Geochemical Characterization Stephen Day Claire Linklater SRK Consulting November 27, 2007 Anchorage

Comparison of NP Results for East Comparison of NP Results for East & West Zones& West Zones

• East Zone samples either equivalent or lower than West Zone

• Some exceptions in Cretaceous samples:– Higher median

values wacke/sandstone

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

Diorite Granodiorite Porphyr.monzo-

granodiorite

Wacke,sandstone

Mudstone,siltstone

Fault affectedmaterial

Sample Type

Rat

io o

f N

P v

alu

esP

ebb

le E

ast:

Peb

ble

Wes

t

MedianCretaceous Samples

Ratio = Unity

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

Sedimentary Volcanic

Sample Type

Rati

o o

f N

P v

alu

es

Peb

ble

East:

Peb

ble

West Median Tertiary Samples

Ratio = Unity

Page 17: Pebble Project Geochemical Characterization Stephen Day Claire Linklater SRK Consulting November 27, 2007 Anchorage

Comparison of NP/AP Results ForComparison of NP/AP Results For Pebble East & West Zone Pebble East & West Zone

• Overall conclusions same for East and West:– Cretaceous mineralized

rocks are mainly PAG.– Tertiary rocks are

mainly non-PAG.

• Median NP/AP for East Zone often greater than West Zone.

0.1

1

10

100

Diorite Granodiorite Porphyr.monzo-

granodiorite

Wacke,sandstone

Mudstone,siltstone

Fault affectedmaterial

Sample Type

Rat

io o

f N

P/A

P v

alu

esP

ebb

le E

ast:

Peb

ble

Wes

t

MedianCretaceous Samples

Ratio = Unity

0.1

1

10

100

Sedimentary Volcanic

Sample Type

Ra

tio

of

NP

/AP

va

lue

sP

eb

ble

Ea

st:

Pe

bb

le W

es

t Median Tertiary Samples

Ratio = Unity

Page 18: Pebble Project Geochemical Characterization Stephen Day Claire Linklater SRK Consulting November 27, 2007 Anchorage

Field Weathering TestsField Weathering Tests

Page 19: Pebble Project Geochemical Characterization Stephen Day Claire Linklater SRK Consulting November 27, 2007 Anchorage

Field Weathering TestsField Weathering TestsBarrel # Age Zone Rock Types

1 Tertiary East Andesite/Basalt

2 & 3 – Duplicates Tertiary West Andesite/Basalt

4 Tertiary East Dacite

5 & 6 - Duplicates Tertiary West Conglomerates

7 Tertiary East+West Wacke/sandstone

8 Tertiary East+West Mudstone

9 & 10 - Duplicates Cretaceous West Intrusive rocks

11 & 12 - Duplicates Cretaceous West Sedimentary rocks

13 --- --- Blank, left empty

Page 20: Pebble Project Geochemical Characterization Stephen Day Claire Linklater SRK Consulting November 27, 2007 Anchorage

Conclusions from 2007 ProgramConclusions from 2007 Program

• East Zone showing similar results to West Zone– Cretaceous mineralized rock is mainly PAG.– Tertiary rock is mainly non-PAG.