Upload
leon-reed
View
222
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005
Establishing a Constitutional Democracy
Chapter Two
Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005
The Colonial Experience With Democracy
• Right to govern given by God--divine right• Royal colonies
– King’s representative– elected assemblies
• Pilgrims– religious dissenters– rejected divine right of kings– formed Mayflower Compact
• express consent to be governed
Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005
The Colonial Experience With Democracy
• Proprietary colonies: governed by English noble or company– when unsuccessful became royal colony
• Power in both types of colonies divided– governor: patronage power– two-chamber legislature: power to tax
• lower chamber: colonial assembly• upper chamber: colonial council• not democratic: voting restricted to qualified male
Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005
Spread of Democratic Ideals During the Revolutionary War
• Taxation without representation– Colonists asked to help with cost of keeping troops
in colonies– 1765 imposition of Stamp Tax on colonies
• already in use in Britain, where taxes were higher than in the colonies
• colonists had never paid a direct tax and had no voice• Stamp Act Congress• Patriots - Boston Tea Party
Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005
Spread of Democratic Ideals During the Revolutionary War
• The Continental Congresses– 1774: First Continental Congress
• 12 colonies sent delegates• issued statement of rights, called for boycott• Patriots began military activity
– Shot heard round the the world– 1775: Second Continental Congress– 1776: Declaration of Independence– Seven year war for independence ended with the
Treaty of Paris in 1783.
Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005
Theory of Rights and Representation
• Consent of the Governed– Hobbes (1651)– Critical ideal in the Declaration
• Separation of Powers– Locke (1690) consent of governed, but no need to
concentrate power in one ruler– Legislative power– Executive power– Montesquieu later added judicial power
Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005
Theory of Rights and Representation
• Citizen Rights and Representation– Whigs: critics of concentration of power in
British government• not enough to have separation of powers• citizens should be able to check government• Harrington: elections for the ablest leaders• Thomas Paine: Common Sense• application of these rights restricted to men with
property
Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005
Government After Independence
• Broadening of Participation– Aftermath of war: easing of property
holding voting restrictions– Impact on who was elected– Term limits– Abigail Adams: early advocate of suffrage
for women
Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005
Government After Independence
• Articles of Confederation (1781-1789)– “Firm league of friendship”– Continental Congress granted limited powers
• could not tax directly• could declare war, but not raise an army directly• could coin money; but could not stop states from doing
so• could negotiate with other countries on tariffs, but so
could individual states• could not force states to get along commercially• supermajority required to take any action• unanimity required to alter Articles
Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005
Government After Independence
• Shay’s Rebellion
• Other domestic unrest
• Threats from abroad– Britain– Spain– France
• Need for solution to weak governance
Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005
The Constitutional Convention
• Preceded by the Annapolis Convention– Reform minded– Only 5 states represented
• Madison requested Congress ask each state to send delegates to a convention – Purpose: revise the Articles– Most states favored some revision– Those who did not stayed away
Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005
The Constitutional Convention
• Secret meeting• Revision became starting over• Virginia Plan was the starting point for new
government– Changed nature of Congress dramatically– Equality to proportionality in terms of number of
senators and representatives– Congress with far greater powers than before
Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005
The Constitutional Convention
• Virginia plan had support of more populous states
• Less populous states were uneasy• New Jersey plan offered as alternative
– Three branches with different powers– Kept one chamber of Congress with each state
having one vote– Did not grant Congress broad powers but rather very
specific powers
Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005
The Constitutional Convention
• The Connecticut Compromise– Majority of states supported Virginia Plan– Small states considered leaving and thus
killing chance of ratification– Committee given task of resolving problem– split the difference solution
• big states - House proportionate to population• small states - equality in the Senate
Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005
Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005
A Government of Separated Powers
• End result was a government with three branches that divided power among them– Legislative
• powers: tax, coin money, regulate commerce, declare war, maintain an army
• necessary and proper clause• House chosen by voters every two years; no term limits• Senate selected by state legislatures; six year terms• states could choose own voter qualifications
Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005
A Government of Separated Powers
• Executive– Presidential power under tight congressional
control– Senatorial advice and consent
• president signs treaties; treaties only take effect if 2/3s of Congress approves
– Impeachment clause makes president dependent on Congress
• House impeaches the president• Senate tries the president
Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005
A Government of Separated Powers
• Electoral College– Large versus small state dispute– Popular vote? Large states would dominate
presidential choice– Chosen by Senate? Small states would have extra
influence– Resolution: compromise with the electoral college
• select electors from states (states choose how to select) and then electors vote for president
Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005
How the Electoral College Works
• Each state chooses same number of electors as it has House and Senate members in Congress.
• If a candidate receives a majority of the electoral votes, the person becomes president.
• If no majority, the vote goes to the House of Representatives
• The electoral college remains controversial.
Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005
Judicial Compromise
• Most delegates agreed on need for a Supreme Court• Did not agree on need for lower courts• Compromise: left it to Congress to decide• Judicial review controversial as well
– Some, perhaps most, supported the court having authority to declare laws null and void
– However, when opposition emerged, the delegates maintained silence and left the issue alone
– Supremacy Clause
Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005
Compromising on Slavery
• Topic was discussed– Only one delegate said it was their moral duty to
eliminate slavery– Focus was instead ending international slave trade– Compromise reached: slave importation would
cease in 20 years.– 3/5’s Compromise
• counting slaves traded for imposing tariffs on foreign goods
Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005
A Bill of Rights
• What of the protection of people’s liberties?– Neglected to include provisions in draft of the
Constitution– State constitutions generally included such
provisions.– Protection of liberties the duty of the states?– Roadblock to ratification; needed explicit
expression of Whig theory of rights– Bill of Rights was promised
Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005
Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005
Federalists versus Anti-Federalists: The Debate• Anti-Federalists
– decentralized government– popular government– feared tyranny– feared a powerful
presidency
– feared a Congress with
too few representatives
• Federalists– national government
necessary to create strong country
– external threats – internal factions willing to
impose will on others– these = tyranny as well– Solutions:
• separation of powers
• checks and balances
Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005
Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005
Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005
Amendments to the Constitution
• Need for compromise– Big states: fear of stagnation and
protracted conflict with unanimity rule for amending
– Small states: fear of dominance of big state agendas
– Fear of endangering slavery if amending too easily accomplished
– Result: complicated formula
Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005
Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005
Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005
Assessing the Constitution:
A Step Backward?• Constitution consolidated changes that
already existed in states– Citizen participation – Representation
• Constitution did not extend the right to vote, but did not restrict it further.
• Altered the institutional nature of the national government
Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005
Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005
Assessing the Constitution:
A Step Backward? Criticisms
– Powers of the Supreme Court poorly defined– Electoral college does not always seem to work– Other issues poorly defined, vaguely expressed– Falls short of expressing contemporary democratic
ideals– Shortfalls related to the need for ratification
• slavery• voting rules• win support of white, male, propertied population
Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005
Assessing the Constitution:
Achievements• Created unified nation capable of
defending itself• Facilitated the country’s economic
development– Outlawing separate state currencies– Outlawed state tariffs
• Created a presidency that was first filled by Washington
Pearson Education, Inc. © 2005
Assessing the Constitution:
The Constitution Today• Constitution continues to give many
groups/interests opportunities to voice their concerns– Constitutional ambiguity– Adaptability– Successful governing arrangements
• Stain of slavery– Could not resolve an intractable problem– Strong solution would mean no ratification