Upload
trinhdiep
View
228
Download
7
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Submission to the Review of Indigenous Land Corporation and Indigenous Business Australia
January 2014
Introduction
This paper submits that the existing structure1 and functions of the Indigenous Land Corporation
(ILC) and Indigenous Business Australia (IBA) are appropriate, effective and efficient. Both agencies
have performed effectively for almost 20 years, and have operated with autonomy from Ministers
on both sides of Parliament. Both are agile allowing them to collaborate with industry, Indigenous
stakeholders and Commonwealth, State and Territory Governments, and each other to make distinct
and significant contributions to the well being of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
The ILC and the Land Account were established following passage of the Native Title Act 1993 (NTA)
in recognition of, and as partial compensation for the “vast majority of Indigenous Australians (that)
have been dispossessed of that which is most precious to their sense of history and spirituality, that
most essential component of their heritage—their land”2. In return, the Native Title Act provided
certainty for non-Indigenous Australians regarding the security of land tenure. Any move to dilute
the functions of the ILC or to use the Land Account for anything other than providing land acquisition
and land management assistance would constitute a breach of that legislative compact, an attack on
Indigenous rights, and a fundamental breach of faith with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
peoples.
The Indigenous estate comprises more than 20% of Australia’s land mass and the ILC plays a critical
role in assisting its management to achieve social, cultural, environmental and economic benefits.
The ILC acknowledges that Indigenous economic development is a key policy priority for the
Australian Government and for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, but submits it would be
simplistic to allocate the whole of this responsibility to two Indigenous corporations with limited
resources. Indigenous economic development requires a whole of government focus and funding,
including for school attendance and education; social and welfare reform; and developing
government procurement processes that promote Indigenous employment and actively seek out
Indigenous service providers.
The ILC is a mature organisation that has continuously improved and refined its strategies, policies
and practices over 20 years. It has sought independent expert advice to develop its governance
arrangements3 and to review and develop its tourism investments4. It has had unqualified financial
statements since its inception in 1996 and its subsidiaries have also achieved unqualified audits.
1 Established under the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Act 2005 (the Act)
2 ATSIC Amendment (Indigenous Land Corporation and Land Fund) Bill 1994 – Second Reading 1994
3 Deloitte 2012 – available at http://www.ilc.gov.au/Publications/Corporate-Documents
4 McGrath Nichol 2013 – available at http://www.ilc.gov.au/Publications/Corporate-Documents
2
If a key objective is to increase Indigenous economic development opportunities, then the ILC Board
shares this vision and believes this can be best delivered and accelerated through a mature
organisation with a proven track record.
The ILC has been able to utilise its expertise to develop innovative programs to improve production
on Indigenous-held lands, develop Indigenous tourism enterprises5 and to assist the development of
carbon methodologies and land sector carbon projects6. As a small agency with limited funds, the
ILC collaborates on over 75% of its projects with other industry, philanthropic organisations and
government agencies. This enables the ILC to leverage funding to achieve even greater benefits for
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
Amalgamation with another agency or corporation or absorption into a Department presents a
significant risk of diluting or losing this accumulated intellectual capital and land management
expertise, and the ability to leverage funding from other sources. It will result in the reversion to a
less mature organisation with confused and conflicting functions. There will be a loss of momentum
that could jeopardise existing collaborations on current projects and result in a decrease in
Indigenous employment and training outcomes.
The Land Account and the ILC are compensatory institutions and should be seen as being held
in trust for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples
The Land Account and the ILC were established as key elements of the ‘grand bargain’ that
underpinned the passage of the NTA in 1993 and provided recognition and partial compensation for
the prior extinguishment of Native Title for the vast majority of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
peoples. Importantly, the package provided certainty for non-Indigenous Australians regarding the
security of land tenure, something which is now taken for granted. The ILC Board submits that any
attempt to amalgamate the ILC with any other organisation will undermine this fundamental
compensatory acknowledgment of dispossession. Amalgamation creates the risk that revenues from
the Land Account will be diverted away from their intended use in acquiring and managing land for
Indigenous benefit. This would be in direct contravention of the understanding and compact
reached at the time Native Title legislation was passed by the Parliament and would constitute a
breach of faith with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Further to that, it would risk
undermining the Government’s commitment to achieving constitutional recognition for Aboriginal
and Torres Strait Islander peoples. The view that the ILC has a fundamental role in complementing
the NTA to deliver land justice for dispossessed Indigenous peoples was a common and strongly
voiced theme throughout the consultation process conducted in 2012 for the review of the National
Indigenous Land Strategy (NILS).
ILC’s contribution to Indigenous economic development through partnership and innovation
The ILC has a demonstrated record of direct contribution to Indigenous economic development
through assisting the creation of Indigenous enterprises; helping bring Indigenous land into
production; providing employment and training benefits; and assisting Indigenous corporations with
property planning and management.
5 Ayers Rock Resort, Mossman Gorge Centre and Home Valley Station – www.ilc.gov.au
6 Fish River Fire Project – www.fishriver.com.au
3
Working in partnership across sectors, the ILC is achieving real job outcomes in remote and regional
Australia, providing economic opportunities where people live and investing long term in the
development of new industries of culturally-based enterprises. In collaboration with Indigenous
landowners, the ILC manages a cattle herd of almost 100,000 head across Australia and operates
significant tourism ventures at Mossman Gorge (QLD), Yulara (NT) and in the East Kimberley (WA).
The ILC currently employs over 300 Indigenous Australians. The ILC displayed leadership in
establishing the first land sector project under the Carbon Farming Initiative—the Fish River Fire
Project in the NT—and continues to seek and invest in innovative ways to increase the viability of
Indigenous-held land. Accordingly, the ILC has demonstrated it is effective in driving Indigenous
economic development through employment, training and business development and land
acquisition and management.
The ILC’s remit is broader than “Economic Development”
The purposes of the ILC, set out in s191B of the ATSI Act, focus on assisting Indigenous persons to
acquire land and manage Indigenous-owned land to achieve economic, environmental, social or
cultural benefits. This is a broad remit that enables the ILC to reflect the aspirations of Indigenous
groups and acknowledges the fundamental significance of land to the lives of Aboriginal and Torres
Strait Islander peoples. The ILC can acquire properties, or provide land management assistance, for
cultural and environment purposes, which may be viable and sustainable in terms of meeting land
holding responsibilities and costs, but not necessarily profitable on a commercial return on
investment basis. The ILC increasingly seeks to collaborate with Indigenous Australians to address
their priorities—for example, it has provided significant assistance in the settlement of the Dja Dja
Wurrung native title settlement in Victoria and is in negotiations regarding possible roles it might
play in potential settlements in other States. During the NILS consultations undertaken in 2012, it
was noted that all four benefit areas—social, cultural, environmental and economic—were assessed
as ‘Important’ by survey respondents, and were seen as being complementary to one another. It is
important that the delivery of cultural, environmental and social benefits through land acquisition
and land management not be discounted in favour of a single focus on economic development.
Assisting management of the Indigenous estate
The Indigenous estate comprises more than 20% of the Australian land mass and is expanding. It
requires sufficient allocation of funds to enhance the capabilities and skills of and resources available
to Indigenous landholders if it is to provide benefits to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples
and wider Australia. The ILC is a critical agency working with Indigenous landholders in a range of
situations providing land management assistance, and responding to their priorities and aspirations
to ensure land is effectively managed and not lost from the Indigenous estate. The ILC’s capacity to
effectively respond to these rapidly growing land management needs and priorities stems from
established expertise, long-standing relationships with landholding groups and staff knowledge of
the Indigenous estate, and the demonstrated ability to leverage funding from other sources. This
capacity would be gravely compromised by any change resulting in a single focus on economic
development diverting from the achievement of other legitimate Indigenous land management
assistance needs and aspirations.
4
ILC should remain a separate and independent statutory corporation
The ILC and IBA are fundamentally different organisations and should remain separate. The purposes
and functions of IBA under the ATSI Act mean that it has a commercial focus and is primarily
concerned with profitability and return on investment. The ILC has a broader remit and focuses on a
wider range of outcomes, necessitating longer term vision and a decision-making framework that
accounts for non-economic benefits accruing to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander landholders.
Combining the agencies would risk diluting the distinct purposes and functions of each agency for
which they were established through confusion of purpose and diminishing the gains from
specialisation, organisational maturity and corporate knowledge gained over almost 20 years of
reflection, continuous improvement and sound business practices.
The confusion created by an amalgamated body with some functions that operate on a commercial
basis similar to a bank focused on dealing with individuals, and other functions that are grant based
and focused on Indigenous controlled organisations and not individuals, risks frustrating and
disengaging stakeholders, and in particular, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
Amalgamation of the ILC and IBA presents the risk that funds from the Land Account would be
diverted to non-land commercial purposes. The current division of purposes allows for the ILC and
IBA to collaborate when their functions overlap and the ATSI Act already provides flexibility for this
collaboration in recognising the relationship between the two agencies.
The establishment of the ILC as a statutory body for the allocation of funds from the Land Account
stems from the underlying compensatory purpose of that Account. The beneficial owners of the
Land Account are the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples of Australia and decisions
regarding the use of the Land Account should be made by an Indigenous-controlled Board – not
Ministers of the Crown. The Government of the day is essentially a trustee with fiduciary
responsibilities to ensure Land Account funds are utilised for the purposes of providing land
acquisition and management assistance to achieve Indigenous benefits.
Moreover, there are key organisational characteristics fundamental to the effectiveness of the ILC
that would be placed at risk by greater Ministerial direction or intervention by a central agency,
including:
o flexibility and responsiveness to Indigenous aspiration and priorities
o the ability to develop partnerships with and leverage funding from industry
o the ability to operate at arms’ length from partisan politics, especially in the area of
Commonwealth-State/Territory relations
o the capacity to assist in the ‘hands on’ management of agricultural and tourism businesses
and provide practical, industry-based support to Indigenous landowners
o an outcomes focus, based on Indigenous benefits, in contrast to a departmental
‘output’focus, where political considerations may impact on decision making
o the ability to operate commercial businesses in a private sector environment
o the ability to establish subsidiary corporations with specific functions, eg, NCIE Ltd, a social
enterprise that focuses on Indigenous excellence.
5
The Minister can issue general written directions to IBA, but has no such power in relation to the
ILC7. This arises from the unique status of the ILC and the clear intention of the drafters of the
original legislation to ensure that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples made the key
decisions in relation to the use of the funds emanating from the Land Account. Greater Ministerial
control in relation to ILC activities not only represents a paternalistic and retrograde step in
Indigenous decision-making, but also creates the risk (especially in a tight fiscal environment) that
Land Account monies would be allocated to fund non land activities. It is appropriate that the ILC
remains a separate statutory authority.
Efficient Administration, Transparency and Accountability
The ILC is an effective, efficient and innovative organisation committed to continuous improvement
in delivering economic, environmental, social or cultural benefits to Aboriginal and Torres Strait
Islander peoples. The ILC’s accounts are audited by the ANAO and its financial statements have been
unqualified since its establishment in 1996. Its subsidiaries have also had unqualified financial
statements since their inception.
Opportunities for improvements to the functions of the ILC exist without the need for wholesale
changes to the current model, including widening the investment parameters of the Land Account to
increase annual income (to create greater Indigenous benefits) and to increase the number of Board
members to broaden skill sets and lessen the burden on individual Directors, and reform
appointment processes to ensure they are staggered and skills-based, rather than partisan or
relationship based.
Most importantly, there is a need to strengthen the legislative recognition of the unique status of
the Land Account, and to prohibit Ministerial or Departmental involvement in re-allocating funds
derived from the Land Account.
Attachments
In further support of the ILC’s submission please find attached:
o Information about the ILC and subsidiaries (Attachment A)
o Outline of key strategic and operational risks identified with amalgamating ILC and IBA
(Attachment B)
o Case studies illustrating the ability to achieve Indigenous benefits across the breadth of ILC
legislative responsibilities to deliver economic, cultural, environmental and social benefits
for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples (Attachment C)
o Maps indicating ILC land management activities, land acquisitions and land grants across
Australia (Attachment D).
7 The ILC is still subject to relevant General Policy Orders issued by the Finance Minister under the Commonwealth
Authorities and Companies Act 1997
6
Attachment A
Information about the ILC and subsidiaries
Successive Australian Government’s have recognised access to land
as a contributing factor to reducing Indigenous disadvantage. The
Indigenous Land Corporation (ILC) is an independent Australian
Government statutory authority, established on 1 June 1995 under
the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission Act 1989
(ATSIC Act), to acquire land that would not be otherwise available
to Indigenous people—where native title has been extinguished, for
example. The ILC and the Land Account were established following
passage of the Native Title Act in recognition of, and as partial
compensation for the “vast majority of Indigenous Australians (that)
have been dispossessed of that which is most precious to their sense
of history and spirituality, that most essential component of their
heritage – their land”8.
Following the abolition of ATSIC in 2004, the ILC was re-established
under Part 4A of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Act 2005
(ATSI Act). More recently, the Council of Australian Governments
(COAG) reaffirmed the importance of Indigenous land in efforts to
reduce Indigenous disadvantage, noting that ‘access to land and
Native Title assets, rights and interests can be leveraged to secure
real and practical benefits for Indigenous people’ extending beyond
economic opportunities, to also enable environmental, social and
cultural outcomes9.
The ILC’s statutory purpose is to assist Indigenous Australians to
acquire land, and manage Indigenous-held land, ‘so as to provide
economic, environmental, social or cultural benefits for Aboriginal
persons and Torres Strait Islanders’. To support this purpose, the ILC
administers two programs: the Land Acquisition Program (LAP) and
the Land Management Program (LMP) through which Indigenous
organisations apply for assistance.
The ILC receives annual funding from a special account, the
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Land Account (Land Account).
The Land Account is a capital fund administered by the Department
of the Prime Minister and Cabinet.
8 ATSIC Amendment (Indigenous Land Corporation and Land Fund) Bill 1994
– Second Reading 1994 9 Council of Australian Governments (COAG), National Indigenous Reform Agreement (NIRA)
(Closing the Gap), February 2011 updated agreement, p. 6.
Establishing the ILC and
Land Account were part
of the “grand bargain”
that underpinned the
passage of the Native
Title Act 1993.
As noted in the former Prime
Minister’s second reading
speech for the Land Fund Bill:
“But the process has only just begun and, significant as the native title legislation is with its profound symbolic significance, it will not and cannot be of benefit to all indigenous peoples simply because most who have been dispossessed have been unable to maintain the continued association upon which proof of native title depends. As a consequence, we are now ready for another historic step; a step represented by this bill which recognises the injustice flowing from dispossession and goes some way towards redressing it by providing a means for indigenous communities to acquire, manage and maintain land. The facility of the bill and the high order of the funding provided under it will give indigenous Australians a significant and recurring opportunity to re-establish their relationship with the land. The land fund will be the centrepiece of the social justice measures to be undertaken by the government and represents the major financial element of those proposals. The further measures will be the subject of advice to the government by the Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation and ATSIC later this year. These measures will form part of the social justice package I announced when introducing the native title legislation, and which will be directed towards removing structural and institutional barriers to full participation in Australian economic life by its indigenous peoples, and safeguarding and developing indigenous culture. This legislation by its nature is an important and necessary complement to the native title legislation”
The Hon Paul J Keating, Land Fund Bill
Second Reading Speech, 25 February
1995
7
The fund was created by the Government in 1995 to provide an income stream in perpetuity to the
ILC to fund its activities. Capital contributions were made to the fund between 1995/96 and
2003/04. At 30 June 2013, the net assets of the Land Account were $1.968 billion.
Annual funding to the ILC from the Land Account generally exceeds $50 million per annum
depending on investment outcomes—in 2012/13 the ILC received $65 million and for 2013/14 it
expects to receive $55 million. The legislation provides that a minimum of $45 million shall be paid
to the ILC each year.
As a result of these unique institutional arrangements, funding for the ILC from the Land Account has
a budget neutral impact on current Commonwealth Government budget outlays.
The ILC and its operations have been extensively reviewed over recent years. In 2010, the then
Board commissioned An External Review of the Policies and Programs of the Indigenous Land
Corporation from Aegis Consulting. In 2011, Deloittes undertook a Review of Board Governance
Arrangements at the request of the current Board. The ANAO has recently completed a performance
audit titled The Indigenous Land Corporation’s Administration of the Land Acquisition Program, and
the current Board commissioned in 2012 an end to end review of the purchase of the Ayers Rock
Resort by consultants McGrathNicol, which is still underway.
The key strategic driver for the ILC is the National Indigenous Land Strategy (NILS). The NILS was
recently revamped, based on extensive consultations with over 300 stakeholders. In December
2013, the ILC Board approved the revision of Regional Indigenous Land Strategies10, which will assist
the Board and staff to take into account regional diversity and the specific needs of Indigenous
people in different parts of the nation.
Since its establishment, the ILC has acquired 246 properties totalling almost six million hectares in all
States and Territories for the benefit of Indigenous persons, and has provided thousands of land
management grants to assist Indigenous landowners. At Attachment C are maps that provide a
visual representation of the geographic spread of ILC activities since its establishment.
In businesses directly managed by the ILC, there were 393 Indigenous staff and 350 trainees. Of 125
land acquisition and land management projects undertaken in 2012/13, 39 per cent provided access
to and protection of cultural and environmental values, 78 per cent were collaborative and
leveraged funding from other agencies, there were 1,451 Indigenous employees enabled through ILC
funding assistance and 2,347 training outcomes. The ILC’s Annual Report 2012-13 summarises the
ILC’s performance and achievements in Chapter Two and provides much more detailed data on
these outcomes.
ILC Subsidiaries In accordance with section 191G of the Act, the ILC may make arrangements with a subsidiary to
perform one or more of the ILC’s functions. Subsidiaries of the ILC are governed by Part 4A of the Act
and by the Corporations Act 2001. In accordance with section 29 of the Commonwealth Authorities
and Companies 1997 (CAC Act), ILC subsidiaries cannot do anything the ILC cannot do.
10
A requirement of S.191P of the ATSI Act
8
The ILC has established subsidiaries to achieve specific ends that might not be achieved through the
ILC carrying out a function directly. These ends can be diverse and range from employing people on
a private enterprise model, quarantining legal liability issues, attracting tax deductibility for
charitable functions and attracting or engaging expertise not available within the ILC.
ILC governance and oversight of its subsidiaries is exercised through:
o shareholding/membership arrangements o section 191G agreements o nominated ILC Directors on subsidiary Boards o relevant constitutional arrangements.
The ILC has four wholly-owned subsidiaries as follows: o National Indigenous Pastoral Enterprises Pty Ltd (NIPE)
NIPE was established in 2004. NIPE provides the employment vehicle for the staff working on ILC-held or operated businesses. This enables such staff to be employed on a private industry basis and in accordance with pastoral terms and conditions.
o National Centre of Indigenous Excellence Ltd (NCIE Ltd)
NCIE Ltd was established in 2009. It is a charitable entity and its purpose is to manage and promote the ILC-owned National Centre of Indigenous Excellence in Redfern, NSW.
o Voyages Indigenous Tourism Australia Pty Ltd (Voyages)
Voyages was established in September 2010 as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the ILC. Its purpose is to own and operate Ayers Rock Resort and manage Mossman Gorge Centre and Home Valley Station.
o The Mutitjulu Foundation (Mutitjulu Foundation)
The Mutitjulu Foundation was established in 2003 by the former owners of Ayers Rock Resort and was inherited by the ILC upon acquisition of the resort on 23 May 2011. It is a charitable entity and administers donations from resort guests for the relief of Indigenous poverty and the advancement of Indigenous people’s education and health.
Jobs, accredited training, enterprise creation and innovation
The ILC successfully operates in collaboration with Aboriginal persons and Torres Strait Islanders and
industry across Australia. It works in remote Australia providing accredited residential training and
creating real job outcomes where people actually live. It has made substantial investments in
complex long-term projects (Gunbalanya and Hodgson Downs in the NT and Mossman Gorge in
QLD), and has successfully collaborated with industry and State/Territory agencies to leverage
additional funding. The following paragraphs set out the ILC’s contributions to innovation, forging
new enterprises, and assisting the management of Indigenous-held land.
9
ILC Pastoral and tourism operations
The ILC operates agricultural and tourism businesses on properties where Indigenous landowners
have sought our assistance. Our businesses are operated in accordance with sound business
principles and have primary goals of:
o supporting sustainable employment and providing accredited training that will lead to
employment for Indigenous people
o bringing Indigenous-held land into production
o creating sustainable Indigenous enterprises
o developing the capacity of Indigenous landowners to assist in the divestment process where
the property is currently held by the ILC.
The ILC makes significant contributions to economic activity in regional and remote Australia
including through:
o Operating 14 agricultural businesses on 2,149,897 hectares of land it owns or leases from
Indigenous land owners with a combined cattle herd of 92,901 head at 30 June 2013. The
remaining ILC agricultural business produces fat lambs and wool and is located on Bruny
Island, Tasmania.
o Oversighting the Indigenous Pastoral Program (IPP) in the NT, which assists Indigenous
landowners with pastoral extension services and training, developing business and property
management plans, natural resource management, negotiating grazing licences, developing
infrastructure, and purchasing plant, equipment and stock. Since 2003, program partners
have invested $25 million of which the ILC has contributed $10 million.
o The Indigenous Landholder Service (ILS), which is a collaborative partnership between the
ILC and the Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia (DAFWA). The ILS
provides technical advice, extension services, and training and support to Indigenous
landholders committed to improving the way in which they manage their land. The ILS is
assisting Indigenous held pastoral leases striving to meet the criteria for renewal of their
pastoral lease, which expire at 30 June 2015.
ILC Training to Employment Initiatives
The ILC’s Training to Employment Program (T2E) provides accredited, enterprise-based training for
up to 300 Indigenous people each year in tourism and agriculture with a job offer guaranteed for all
graduates.
Over the past six years, the ILC has established T2E, including residential training facilities, on its
agricultural businesses, as well as at the Merriman Shearing School, and tourism businesses at Ayers
Rock Resort, Mossman Gorge Centre and Home Valley Station.
Recent key successes include:
o 90% Indigenous workforce at the Mossman Gorge Centre (following an ILC-driven Job
Guarantee Program prior to opening of the business in June 2012)
o 74% Indigenous workforce on our agricultural businesses for 2012/13, an increase from 29%
to 63% over the past five years
10
o 30% Indigenous workforce (or 215 employees) at Ayers Rock Resort following its purchase in
2011. This is an increase from two to 200 Indigenous employees at Ayers Rock Resort in two
years!
Further information on T2E, including the ILC submission to the Indigenous Employment and
Training Review, can be found at: http://www.t2e.org.au/.
Critical to fully valuing ILC success against these indicators is having regard for the way in which
these benefits are achieved. ILC projects are reflective of the aspirations of Indigenous landholder
groups with whom they partner. The realisation of the economic development goals of stakeholders
through innovative demonstration projects serve to empower groups to learn what is achievable on
Indigenous-held land and through Indigenous-owned businesses.
Innovation
The ILC is well known for its innovative approach and the leadership it demonstrates in enabling
Indigenous people to benefit from land-based enterprises, especially in relation to agriculture,
tourism and environmental services. Initiatives in these areas lead to jobs for Indigenous people,
income generation and sustainable land management. This is especially important as it creates
opportunities for productive activities on what is often marginal land. A significant point of
difference in how the ILC operates, compared to other agencies, is the ILC’s ability to use its own
funding investments to leverage additional funding from collaborative partnerships to achieve
greater outcomes. Over 70% of ILC projects stem from partnerships across regional and remote
Australia. The ILC’s flexible, tested and multi-faceted approach has enabled significant benefits to be
achieved. Any proposed new administrative arrangements should enable the organisation to
continue to build and take advantage of the momentum it has created in these areas. This
innovation and leadership is demonstrated through examples such as:
o The groundbreaking Fish River Fire Project (www.fishriver.com.au), the first savanna burning
and Indigenous project under the Carbon Farming Initiative, which since selling carbon
credits is being used as a demonstration project for the benefit of other Indigenous
landholders. As a result of this project, the ILC is seen as a leader in carbon markets with
respect to projects on Indigenous-held land, which was recognised by its nomination for the
2013 Banksia Awards. The ILC has shared the lessons learned from the Fish River Fire Project
with Indigenous groups to assist the approval of savanna burning projects in the Kimberley
and West Arnhem Land. It has collaborated with The Nature Conservancy and the Australian
Government to fund the development of new carbon methodologies for lower rainfall areas,
and for bio-sequestration in higher rainfall areas. The ILC has shown innovation and
leadership in this emerging industry and taken a long-term view of the benefits that could
arise for Indigenous peoples working on country.
o The Mossman Gorge Centre (www.mossmangorge.com.au), which the ILC funded and
constructed and now manages through Voyages Indigenous Tourism Australia. This project
employs up to 70 Indigenous people from the local community, is an award-winning tourism
operation and demonstrates the ILC’s flexibility to undertake strategic projects in
collaboration with Indigenous with groups and to innovatively engage in the development of
new culturally based enterprises.
11
o The ILC’s Training 2 Employment program (www.t2e.org.au). The T2E program provides
training and employment to Indigenous Australians in rural and remote locations. The
overarching model offers guaranteed employment in the agricultural, pastoral, tourism and
hospitality industries to graduates upon successful completion of the program.
o Gunbalanya Station and Gunbalanya Meat Works is a pastoral and meat processing
operation in West Arnhem Land, which employs up to 20 Indigenous jackaroos and meat
workers and supplies fresh, affordable food to remote Indigenous communities in the NT.
The ILC won an Australian Business Award for this project in 2012 in the Community
Contribution category for providing the leadership, resources and expertise to turn the
vision into a sustainable reality.
o Ayers Rock Resort and its associated National Indigenous Training Academy where
Indigenous employment has increased from two to over 200 in the last two years, based on
significant ILC investment and staff engagement.
12
Attachment B – Strategic risks of amalgamation
The ILC Board submits that an amalgamation of the ILC with any other agency presents significant strategic and operational
risks to the successful outcomes and benefits currently being achieved through land acquisition and land management
assistance for Aboriginal and Torres Strait peoples.
Strategic Risks
Breach of faith
with Aboriginal
and Torres Strait
Islander Peoples
Amalgamation and/or significant structural changes away from the original purpose and intent would
represent a breach of faith with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
This could be perceived as undermining the Commonwealth Government’s commitment to the recognition of
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in the Australian Constitution, and reduce the ability of any new
agency to effectively engage with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
Loss of Indigenous
control
Any increase in Ministerial control of the ILC or the Land Account would, by definition, reduce Indigenous
control.
o It would be a retrograde step inconsistent with its original intent to be at arm’s length from
Government
o It would create the risk of a departmental “output” focus, where political considerations may impact
decision making, compared to the current outcomes focused on Indigenous benefits
o be a significant move away from fulfilling the obligations of the UN Declaration on the Rights of
Indigenous Peoples, particularly as it relates to rights to self determination and control of decision
making processes; redress for appropriation of traditional lands and rights to consultation about
legislative and administrative change11
.
Exclusive focus on
economic
development
The amalgamation of ILC with IBA risks a loss of focus on the broader remit of the ILC as social, cultural and
environmental benefits may be discounted in favour of profitability and return on investment.
Unsustainable
demands on the
Land Account
The Land Account was established to provide (in perpetuity) the means and resources to redress the
dispossession of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples through enabling the acquisition and
management of Indigenous-held land.
Amalgamation risks that a new organisation will adopt a commercial focus and that the resources of
Land Account will be used for commercial purposes only
Increased Ministerial control could result in Land Account monies being diverted to non-land purposes,
especially in a tight fiscal environment
Confusion of
Purpose/
Stakeholder
Engagement
Amalgamation of the ILC and IBA would create an organisation delivering an array of distinct programs under
different and conflicting funding models.
The ILC grants funds to Indigenous groups for the exclusive purpose of land based activities delivering
social, cultural, environmental or economic benefits. In contrast, the IBA does not generally grant funds
to Indigenous corporations, rather it loans moneys for commercial purposes and provides business and
financial services to Individuals, families and groups.
An amalgamated body risks frustrating and disengaging stakeholders, and in particular, Aboriginal and
Torres Strait Islander peoples, with a net result of decreasing economic development opportunities.
11
UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Articles 3, 18, 19, 23, 28
13
Operational Risks
Loss of clarity of
purpose and scope
of service
The ILC and IBA were created with distinct, specific and clear purposes and objectives that are articulated in
their enabling legislation. There is a significant risk that in seeking to articulate a combined purpose there will
be a loss of focus on the highly specialised areas of support offered by the individual agencies, resulting in a
narrower scope of service and support for the aspirations of Indigenous landholders and entrepreneurs.
Loss of momentum
and partnerships in
existing projects
Existing and growing partnerships, projects and enterprises may be fundamentally challenged by the
uncertainty of any transition period, resulting in a reduction of economic opportunities for Aboriginal and
Torres Strait Islander peoples.
Loss of
organisational
maturity
The formation of a larger entity with diverse and competing priorities would necessitate the development of
appropriate governance and management structures; this process would be costly in terms of staff hours, loss
of productivity and uncertainty resulting from procedural and structural changes.
Dilution of Board
Expertise
Amalgamation would inevitably require the Board of an amalgamated entity to span a wider range of issues
and would demand a greater diversity of expertise on the Board. The risk would be that this would lead to
shallower focus by Board members and increase strategic risks.
Loss of Staff
Expertise
The ILC has developed significant corporate memory and expertise in the delivery of its land acquisition and
land management function. These could be lost or dissipated if a new agency broadens its focus beyond land
acquisition and management and/or there is a loss of staff through changes to administrative arrangements.
14
Attachment C
Case studies to illustrate significance of the ILC’s contribution
The ILC is involved in hundreds of land acquisition and land management projects across the country
that demonstrate that it is fulfilling the roles it was designed to perform. The following case studies
provide examples that highlight the important achievements made possible through the Land
Account and the ILC.
Budj Bim Landscape properties (VIC)
Since 2002, the ILC has been working with the Gunditjmara people of far west Victoria to realise
their aspirations of maintaining connection to country. Within this traditional landscape, the ILC has
acquired and granted five culturally significant properties to Gunditjmara people at a total cost of
$2.8 million.
To the Gunditjmara traditional owners, the return of the properties represent the triumph of a long
history. The properties and the greater landscape hold significant meaning to the Gunditjmara. The
land bears the creation story of Budj Bim (Mt Eccles) and the Tyrendarra lava flow. The Gunditjmara
developed the landscape by engineering channels to bring water and young eels from Darlots Creek
to low lying areas. They shaped ponds, wetlands and weirs where woven baskets were used to
harvest mature eels. This very early aquaculture provided the economic basis for the development
of a settled society including stone huts. The landscape is also of significance to colonial history
when Gunditjmara fought to maintain land ownership over squatters and settlers. The battle for
legal recognition continued until the successful 2007 Native Title Consent Determination when ‘The
Gunditjmara People were able to provide evidence that they were descended from this community
and had maintained an ongoing connection to their country’12.
Further to the determination, the ILC acquisitions provides more than access to country, they
provide ownership and therefore, the legal authority to determine how the country is managed. The
return of the properties to Gunditjmara ownership fulfils the vision of elders to be recognised as the
first peoples of their country and to care for country themselves. The Budj Bim Ranger team
undertake activities from cultural site protection, weeds and ferals to asset maintenance and
livestock operations. Although employment and training benefits were not anticipated in the
original applications to the ILC, the acquisitions have enabled the expansion of the Budj Bim Ranger
team which commenced in 2002 as a community jobs initiative using a mix of CDEP and fee for
service funding. As the property portfolio increased, the team expanded initially through a special
release funding from Working on Country13 to a team of six full-time Rangers, four casual and two
trainees14 through an allocation of $2,606,971 for 2007-201315.
Three Indigenous Protected Areas (IPAs) have been declared on and adjacent to properties acquired
by the ILC and the Budj Bim Rangers are responsible for maintaining the IPAs in collaboration with
GMTOAC. A 2012 report identifies more than 800 cultural heritage sites across the Gunditjmara
12
National Native Title Tribunal The Gunditjmara People’s native title determinations 30 March 2007 13
File A/001264-02 Folio 272; File PG /001103 folio 74. 14
File PG/001266 Progress Report June 2012, folio 169 – 163. 15
File PG/001266 Post Grant Property Inspection 29 March 201
15
Stone Country, many of which are sited on ILC acquired properties16. Thirty to 100 people per year
are involved in events to maintain or revitalise culture and protect significant sites17. Direct
custodianship of cultural sites and country, is having a profound effect on Gunditjmara people:
‘... without country there seems to be something missing in people and I
think for Gunditjmara people in particular, the chance to be able to access
their traditional lands it shows that they are connected to their country’
(Tom Day, CEO GMTOAC 2012).
The properties are also utilised by Budj Bim Tours, an Indigenous tourism company, through guided
tours of the Budj Bim National Heritage Landscape. Tourism activities provide for the sharing of
cultural knowledge which benefits both the tourists and the tour guides. In acting as tour guides,
the Budj Bim Rangers have had to expand their cultural knowledge and reconnect with their history:
‘…when I did tours I only do the mission because that’s all I know because
mum told me stories. But now I know I can come to the IPA and talk about
different things like the eel traps. I feel comfortable now.’ (Debbie
Malseed, Budj Bim Ranger, 2012).
National and International groups and specialist geological and naturalist groups utilise the
properties for study tours and, other groups including Victorian Police use the properties for cultural
awareness courses. The properties are used by GMTOAC on a regular basis for a number of cultural
and social activities. Stories from stakeholders provide rich descriptions of the benefits being
achieved and the broader changes experienced though owning land.
‘It’s pretty much changed probably the majority of my life. Without the
organisations of Gunditj Mirring and Winda Mara I wouldn’t have seen myself
coming back home. So I guess I could have still been a little bit lost in
life. I suppose coming back here having it’s given me more of a purpose in
life. It’s made me a lot more happier with what I’m doing because it has a
meaning more as to what I was previously doing you know’ (Ben Church GMTOAC
Field Officer 2012).
Participation in the local economy through individual employment and training, corporate
administration, land management activities and purchasing was also seen to have had a positive
impact on Shire level relations.
When the ILC conducted an evaluation of the impact of ILC’s acquisitions clear themes emerged in
collecting the stories of change:
Coming home (bringing people home) to culture, to family, to community
Building an identity as a Gunditjmara person and nation
Revitalising culture and language
Building capacity, personal, professional and corporate through generational succession
Optimism that stems from happiness, confidence, future thinking, and from social and emotional wellbeing
Healing, particularly for elders and broader reconciliation in the Shire
Permanency and certainty as a nation, through owning and living on country.
16
Context (2012) Ngootyoong Gunditj Ngootyoong Mara Cultural Heritage and Social Values Assessment Vol 1. P38. 17
Progress reports: PG –1266; PG/001103 -2
16
The properties were granted to GMTOAC in three stages: Kurtonitj and Wilsons in September 2009,
Peters and Lake Gorrie in May 2010 and Bryant in June 2013. To the ILC, the acquisitions and the
benefits being achieved, represent the result of a decade long collaboration with Winda Mara
Aboriginal Corporation (WMAC) and the Gunditj Mirring Traditional Owners Aboriginal Corporation
(GMTOAC). The cultural acquisitions are examples of the ILC’s commitment to achieving its purpose
set out in the ATSI Act to assist Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people achieve economic, social,
cultural and environmental benefit through owning and managing land. The ILC assistance provided
has been a unique investment of multiple properties and a visionary commitment to re-establishing
traditional ownership of a cultural landscape.
__________________________________________________
National Centre of Indigenous Excellence (Redfern, NSW)
The National Centre for Indigenous Excellence (NCIE) in the suburb of Redfern in Sydney was
established by the ILC to promote Indigenous excellence and success nationally and, in so doing, to
improve the wellbeing of young Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.
In 2012/13 the centre collaborated with more than 20 pathway partners on the delivery of programs
to more than 1,000 and has hosted programs for more than 50 organisations reaching thousands
more. These programs include the NCIE’s employment and development programs, Lifestyle
Innovations for Everyone (LIFE) programs, literacy programs, Indigenous Digital Excellence programs,
and collaborative programs such as the National Aboriginal Sporting Chance Academy’s Careers and
Aspirations Camps, the National Indigenous Youth Leadership’s Academy’s National Conferences and
the Australian Indigenous Mentoring Experience’s Learning Centres.
NCIE also has a high level of engagement with the local Redfern community through its Sports, Arts
and Recreation Centre that provides specialised programs to increase participation in health
activities and improve health outcomes, and enhanced cultural engagement through delivering a
number of community and cultural activities, with over 2000 local community members visiting the
NCIE to celebrate NAIDOC week in July 2012.
‘Working with the NCIE and being one of the foundation tenants has been one
of the most significant steps in AIME’s growth of the program as we have
risen from the streets of Redfern with 25 kids to now be working with over
1000 Indigenous high school kids across the East Coast of Australia.’ Jack
Manning Bancroft, CEO, Australian Indigenous Mentoring Experience
__________________________________________________
17
Mossman Gorge Visitor and Training Centre (via Mossman, QLD)
Mossman Gorge Centre is an Indigenous eco-tourism development, constructed by the ILC and
operated by Voyages, which offers visitors improved access to the Mossman Gorge World Heritage
area and provides employment and training opportunities for Indigenous people. Developed in
collaboration with the local Kuku Yalanji people and opened June 2012, the centre provides visitor
facilities including a café and art gallery as well as shuttle access to the gorge and a choice of
Indigenous cultural tours. The concept for the Centre came from the local Indigenous people
approaching the ILC with a vision that was not only about economic development, but about
reducing the impact of tourists on the local community living near the site, and also protecting and
sharing their Indigenous culture. The venture has contributed to cultural pride and identity and
employs over 60 Indigenous people at the Centre since its opening in June 2012, having a 90%
Indigenous employment rate.
‘My name is Shayleen Rooskelly. I am a full time worker here at the Mossman
Gorge Centre and I do hospitality. I got offered a traineeship and I passed
that and then here at the Mossman Gorge Centre, I got offered a full time
job. I have been teaching my staff ever since I got offered a full time job
and I was only 17. I am only 18 now.
My aim was hoping for at 25 to run my own business in hospitality. Just a
little small business to get me up and running. I have never had goals. You
know, I thought that I was just going to be like other young children, end up
pregnant, drinking, smoking drugs but I just decided not to do those things
and just work.’ (Mossman Gorge Graduate Employee, 2013)
‘My name is Pam Salt and I am a traditional custodian of this area. I am an
artist and I work in the Mossman Gorge Gateway Centre. I am gallery attendant
and I enjoy my job. Some of my artwork is produced on some of the products
that are sold in this gallery. Once the centre opened, it was a big
opportunity because there are a lot of our ancestors today that are not here
to see their dream come true. A lot of them passed away, some are even buried
behind us. So its up to the younger generation to fill that gap for the dream
of what our ancestors our elders wanted’ (Mossman Gorge, Gallery Attendant,
2013)
__________________________________________________
Clontarf College (Perth, WA)
On 1 January 2013, the ILC officially acquired Clontarf Campus in Perth from the Christian Brothers
by Deed of Gift and Trust. Clontarf is a site of historical significance and the Campus acts as site of
connection and meeting place for former residents and orphanage and for the broader community
of South Perth. The Campus has been operating as a multi-use site since the early 1990s for a
number of Indigenous education, training and cultural organisations. The Christian Brothers wanted
to hand the property back to Indigenous people, but the significant land management
responsibilities in managing the property made it difficult to find a suitable Indigenous title-holding
18
body. The Deed of Gift and Trust sets out that the ILC will grant the land to an Indigenous
corporation and the ILC has up to 80 years to make the grant. The ILC will develop a divestment plan
in the coming years that will take into account the Christian Brothers’ purpose in gifting the
property, the long-term tenancy arrangements, the ILC’s capacity to build on the benefits delivered
from the campus, and the capacity of a future title-holding body to continue this work.
‘The handover ceremony was a significant event in the history of land issues
and land rights. The Christian Brothers have shown leadership and foresight
in handing the land back to the original inhabitants of this country. This
gesture makes me very happy and the news about the Clontarf and the handover
has spread around Australia and the world. Handing the campus back to
Noongar people, with the help of the ILC managing the property, has set the
scene for other places around Australia.’ Robert Isaacs OAM CM JP, attended
Clontarf in late 1950s
__________________________________________________
National Indigenous Training Academy
The National Indigenous Training Academy (the Academy), based at Yulara, was established by the
ILC to assist in creating an Indigenous workforce for the tourism and hospitality industry.
The Academy provides accredited enterprise based training at Ayers Rock Resort resulting in
Certificate II and Certificate III qualifications. The Academy has partnered with William Angliss
Institute as the preferred training provider. Trainees are employed by the Resort from the first day
of training and continue their employment at the Resort or with an industry partner on successful
completion of the traineeship. The latest completion rate for trainees is 65 per cent and the first
graduates from the program have just entered their third year of employment with the Resort. The
Academy recruits trainees regularly, both locally and across Australia, with up to 60 trainees
undertaking training at any one time. Trainees live in dedicated accommodation at the Resort and
the Academy works in partnership with the Resort to provide holistic support to trainees to facilitate
high rates of completion.
Innovative developments in the program include the development of the ‘Knowledge of Australian
Indigenous Tourism’ course to provide trainees with a greater understanding of the tourism industry,
which has proven particularly important when responding to guest enquiries. The Academy and the
Resort officially opened the Kulata Café last year during NAIDOC week. The Café is run by trainees
and provides guests with the opportunity to interact with Indigenous staff.
Jasmine Stadhams is an inspirational young woman who came to Ayers Rock Resort from the small
town of Bowraville in the NSW mid-north coast hinterland and graduated from the Academy in June
2013. Jasmine completed a Certificate III in Hospitality (Retail stream) and acquired the supervisory
skills needed to become a manager at one of the Resort’s busy boutique outlets. She assists in
inducting new Indigenous trainees into the enterprise based training program and is a role model for
aspiring Indigenous trainees.
19
"In my time in the Indigenous Traineeship Program I learned that hard work,
determination and dedication will get you ahead in your career."
Jasmine Stadhams, NITA Graduate and ARR Employee
__________________________________________________
Dja Dja Wurrung native title settlement (VIC)
Under its Native Title Policy, the ILC was able to the support the native title settlement between the
Victorian Government and Dja Dja Wurrung. The ILC contributed a targeted funding package to
support future Dja Dja Wurrung land based activities worth over $1 million, which includes:
The purchase of a culturally significant free-hold property at Mount Barker, which contains some of the largest and most complex stone arrangements in Victoria
Assistance to acquire a depot for Dja Dja Wurrung Enterprises to help the enterprise build its environmental services business
Land management funding for infrastructure and equipment.
The ILC funding package assists Dja Dja Wurrung meet their aspirations for owning land of cultural
significance, as well as building sustainable economic development in the land management sector.
20
Attachment D – Maps illustrating ILC land acquisition and land management activities
GEELONG
26 Mertin Street, Bourke NSW
GOOMALLING
Mt Barker
Tyntynder
Modder River Station
Paddy's Island
Jarwonga (Billa Downs)
DiamondValley
Julallan
Waterfall
West Swan PS
Tomerong
Mouth HouseBellfields
Boona
Windarra
St Clair Mission
Dawnvale (Bana Mindilji)
Warrengie
Thornhill
Cowga
Denham Industrial Site
Dorodong
Lot 2099 Clemenston St
Hillford
Mystery Rd/ Mt TamborineMount
Barney View
Minyumai
Tom's Gully/Toorooka
Mt William Axe Quarry
Gwambygine EstateWattleridge
Kala KulinjMoore Street Allotments
Bonython Section 188 HD
Coranderrk Homestead
UdiallaSprings
Coburn
Wondaby
Carisbrook
Mungalla Stud
Canoon & RosemontJubal
Valley Arm
Bindi
Cyprus Hellene
Kippa-Ring
Farwest Scallops
Sunbury Earthen Rings
Speewa Rd
Redbanks 2
Toorum Stones
Timber CreekMt Baird
The North
Lenahans
McLeods
Doltons
BulgandramineMission
Virginia Prawns
Thule
Karnte Block
Mooki & Bassendean
Hexters and Karyie Farm ManunkaFarm
Yallallie
Tambellup
Coobabla Farm
Seaview
Currawillinghi
Springfield Gorge
Laura Bay
Montillie
EdgertonBoorabee
Dowrene
Mary River Roadhouse
Narinyeri House
Songvaar Road
Toogimbie and LorenzoGlenhope
Davies TerraceGlenroy Farm
NiokaMontillie Excision
Yielima
Hillgrove Station
Millers
Elimdale
WurdiYouang
Twin Rivers
Illaroo
Boole Poole
Martang
Cangai Creek Station
Pumphouse
Old Homebush Road
River Road
Fords Road
Kerang Allotments
Gaythorne
Barongarook Farm
Trefoil Island
Randwick Farm
Balo StreetMoree, 211
Beenleigh, 2 Plantation R
35 Cope Street
16-18 McCormack Street
Kidman Street
Dillon Bay FarmSwamp River Farm
Hay St
KurtonitjLake Condah Parcels - Wilsons
Highland Park
178 Queen Street St Marys NSW
Jubilee Park
76 Dick Ward Drive
CoolibahDrive
242 Sheridan St, Cairns
Peters PropertyLake Gorrie
Jimbour Street
Gold Coast Highway Miami 2024
Heath Road Mt Belmont
Walker St nr 53, Bundaberg
Rumbalara Multi-Aged Care Complex
16 Fogarty Street
White Avenue Mt Gambier SA
35 Gladstone Street
Old Sister Kates Home Site Excision
Gowan Brae
Mimosa
Mindanao (Banana Properties)Tiamby (Banana Properties)
Somerset (Banana Properties)
Eurool
Gibbagunya
Maidenwell Acres
Dunkerton Road Lot 215-6Old Pooncarie Mission
Highland Park#2
Alice Springs Railway Yard
Murrayfield & Kirkby Lodge
Kooreelah
Jinchilla Gardens
Menera
Kywong
Bollanolla Farm
Warriparinga
Falbala Farm
Roelands Farmand Mission
Black Theatre Site
Penryn &Consul
Trelawney Station
Wawu Dimbi
Jumbun Farm
Broad St Lots
OTC-Dampier Peninsula
St Marys Site
Peachtree Centre
Laverton Town Block
69 Haggup Street
Roebuck Cattle yards
Doriemus House
Curedale Street
Bilwon DownsNgoonbi Farm
233 Abercrombie StreetLake Pleasant View
Jupps Riverside
Redfern Public School
Murray's Lagoon
Rothesay Circle
Malimup Springs
Avondale Park
Mossman Gorge
Old Sister Kates Home Site
Ambleside Street WEST END71 Haggup Street
Clontarf Campus
Wurangura Street Newman
Taylor Street, 31 COEN7 SHEPARD STREET, COEN
Kalamunda Road (24) South Guildford WA
Weipa Hostel
Mella Road (17) Smithton
Sussex Street (2) Maylands WA
Bryant
Mt Clarence
Mogila
Silver Plains
Urannah
Mt View Stn
Middle Park
Emu Creek Station
Mulgul Stn
Cardabia Station
Bulimba
Murra Murra
Myrtle Springs Stn
Namul-NamulStation
Leigh Creek Station
King Valley Station
Compton Downs
Mt Willoughby
Badjuballa
Ooratippra Stn
Strathgordon
YappalaGlen Boree
Weilmoringle & Orana
Poolamacca Stn
Geikie Station
Mt Wittenoom Station
Mt Tabor
Culpra Station
Durack RiverHome Valley
Karunjie
Myroodah/Luluigui
Roebuck Plains Station
Crocodile StationWelcome Station
Merepah Station
Carranya
Merriman
BankaBanka
West
Mawonga
Ayers Rock Resort
Fish River
WINTON
NARRABRI
LOCKHARTRIVER
BIRDSVILLEWINDORAH
COBARWILCANNIA
NORMANTON
WYNDHAM
LAGRANGE
DERBY
KADINA
COLLIE
MARBLEBAR
PORTHEDLAND
KUNUNURRA
MOUNTMAGNET LAVERTON
NORSEMAN
NHULUNBUY
COOBERPEDY
WARBURTON
FITZROYCROSSING
TELFER
HALLSCREEK
YULARA
MADURA
KIMBA
TURKEYCREEK
BALLADONIA
ESPERANCE
NEWMAN
MOUNT ISA
OODNADATTA
BORROLOOLA
CORRIGIN
SURAT
RAWLINNA
MORAWA
INNAMINCKA
STAMFORD
PORT AUGUSTA
ALBANY
ST MARYS
MEEKATHARRA
CEDUNA
CHARLEVILLE
BURNIE
CUNNAMULLA
DEVONPORT
QUEENSTOWN
NYNGAN
KATANNING
SWAN HILL
BATCHELOR
PARKESRENMARK
BATEMANS BAY
BALRANALD HAY
ROEBOURNE
TOMPRICE
EXMOUTH
ALPHA
OENPELLI
SALE
GOONDIWINDI
COOKTOWN
LIGHTNING RIDGE
MOUNT GAMBIER
ARMIDALE
GERALDTON
KALGOORLIE-BOULDER
WOORABINDA
PORT LINCOLN
COFFS HARBOUR
MILDURA
HORSHAM
EMERALD
WESTWYALONG
CAIRNS
DUNMARRAROADHOUSE
TOWNSVILLE
YUENDUMU
BUNDABERG
TENNANTCREEK
LAJAMANUBROOME
KATHERINE
BEGA
LEIGHCREEKSOUTH
WANGARATTA
THURSDAYISLAND
BORDERTOWN
ROCKHAMPTON
CHARTERSTOWERS
ALICESPRINGS
MILINGIMBI
AURUKUN
AUGUSTA
GRAFTON
BARCALDINE
ORANGE
THARGOMINDAH
COONABARABRAN
WARRN-AMBOOL
BROKEN HILL
ULLADULLAECHUCA
BURKETOWN
NULLARBOR
CARNARVON
TAMWORTH
BOURKE
ALBURY-WODONGA
NEWCASTLE
BENDIGO
WAGGA WAGGA
SHEPPARTON
WOLLONGONG
TOOWOOMBA
CENTRALCOAST
MACKAY
BALLARAT
DUBBO
LAUNCESTON
GOLD COAST
SydneySydney
HobartHobart
PerthPerth
AdelaideAdelaide
MelbourneMelbourne
DarwinDarwin
CanberraCanberra
BrisbaneBrisbane
NorthernTanami IPA
Warlu JilajaaJumu IPA
DjelkIPA
NgaanyatjarraIPA
WatarruIPA Walalkara
IPA
SouthernTanami IPA
BirriliburuIPA
KalamurinaHPOT
Nullarbor NP
Mamungari CP
SimpsonDesert CP
LakeEyre NP
Witjira NPSimpson
Desert RR
Nullarbor RRYellabinna RR
Great VictoriaDesert NR
GibsonDesert NR
Karlamilyi NP
DundasNR
0 500 1,000 1,500 Kilometers
ILC Land Acquisition Activity14 January 2014
ILC Map No. 2298Copyright Indigenous Land Corporation 2014.
This map is for the exclusive use of the ILC and entities authorised by the ILC.Use of the map without the prior written approval of the ILC may amount to a breach
of copyright and may infringe the secrecy provisions contained in theAboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Act 2005.
The ILC makes no warranties as to the currency and accuracy of information depicted.This map remains the property of the ILC and may not be copied by any means.Topographic data and data elevation model source from GeoScience Australia.
Australian Lambert Conformal Conic Projection Coordinate System based on GDA94 Datum.
Declared Indigenous Protected Area (DotE 2012)CAPAD Protected Area (DotE 2012)
ILC land acquisition less than 15,000 ha.
ILC land acquisition greater than 15,000 ha.
ILC Acquired PropertyILC Granted Property
ILC Acquired PropertyILC Granted Property
Protected Areas
14-Jan-2014
73 ILC Held properties160 ILC Granted properties233 ILC Held or ILC Granted properties as of 14 January 2014
NorthernTanami IPA
Yalata IPA
Warlu JilajaaJumu IPA
WarddekenIPA
DjelkIPA
NgaanyatjarraIPA
WatarruIPA
WalalkaraIPA
SouthernTanami IPA
BirriliburuIPA
WilingginIPA
KalamurinaHPOT
KakaduNPC
Nullarbor NP
Mamungari CP
SimpsonDesert CP
LakeEyre NP
Witjira NPSimpson
Desert RR
Nullarbor RRYellabinna RR
Great VictoriaDesert NR
GibsonDesert NR
Karlamilyi NP
DundasNR
SydneySydney
HobartHobart
PerthPerth
AdelaideAdelaide
MelbourneMelbourne
DarwinDarwin
CanberraCanberra
BrisbaneBrisbane
WINTON
NARRABRI
LOCKHARTRIVER
BIRDSVILLEWINDORAH
COBARWILCANNIA
NORMANTON
WYNDHAM
LAGRANGE
DERBY
KADINACOLLIE
MARBLEBAR
PORT HEDLAND
KUNUNURRA
MOUNTMAGNET LAVERTON
NORSEMAN
NHULUNBUY
COOBERPEDY
WARBURTON
FITZROYCROSSING
TELFER
HALLSCREEK
YULARA
MADURA
KIMBA
TURKEYCREEK
BALLADONIA
ESPERANCE
NEWMAN
MOUNTISA
OODNADATTA
BORROLOOLA
CORRIGIN
SURAT
RAWLINNA
MORAWA
INNAMINCKA
STAMFORD
PORTAUGUSTA
ALBANY
ST MARYS
MEEKATHARRA
CEDUNA
CHARLEVILLE
BURNIE
CUNNAMULLA
DEVONPORT
QUEENSTOWN
NYNGAN
KATANNING
SWANHILL
BATCHELOR
PARKESRENMARK
BATEMANS BAY
BALRANALDHAY
ROEBOURNE
TOMPRICE
EXMOUTH
ALPHA
OENPELLI
SALE
GOONDIWINDI
COOKTOWN
LIGHTNINGRIDGE
MOUNTGAMBIER
GOOMALLING
ARMIDALE
GERALDTON
KALGOORLIE-BOULDER
WOORABINDA
PORTLINCOLN
GEELONG
COFFSHARBOUR
MILDURA
HORSHAM
EMERALD
WESTWYALONG
CAIRNSDUNMARRAROADHOUSE
TOWNSVILLE
YUENDUMU
BUNDABERG
TENNANTCREEK
LAJAMANUBROOME
KATHERINE
BEGA
LEIGHCREEKSOUTH
WANGARATTA
THURSDAYISLAND
BORDERTOWN
ROCKHAMPTON
CHARTERSTOWERS
ALICESPRINGS
MILINGIMBI
AURUKUN
AUGUSTA
GRAFTON
BARCALDINE
ORANGE
THARGOMINDAH
COONABARABRAN
WARRNAMBOOL
BROKENHILL
ULLADULLAECHUCA
BURKETOWN
NULLARBOR
CARNARVON
TAMWORTH
BOURKE
ALBURY-WODONGA
NEWCASTLE
BENDIGO
WAGGAWAGGA
SHEPPARTON
WOLLONGONG
TOOWOOMBA
CENTRAL COAST
MACKAY
BALLARAT
DUBBO
LAUNCESTON
GOLDCOAST
0 500 1,000 1,500 Kilometers
ILC Property Based Land Management Projects13 January 2014
ILC Map No. 2302Copyright Indigenous Land Corporation 2014.
This map is for the exclusive use of the ILC and entities authorised by the ILC.Use of the map without the prior written approval of the ILC may amount to a breach
of copyright and may infringe the secrecy provisions contained in theAboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Act 2005.
The ILC makes no warranties as to the currency and accuracy of information depicted.This map remains the property of the ILC and may not be copied by any means.Topographic data and data elevation model source from GeoScience Australia.
Australian Lambert Conformal Conic Projection Coordinate System based on GDA94 Datum.
Declared Indigenous Protected Area (DotE 2012)CAPAD Protected Area (DotE 2012)
ILC Land Management ProjectsProperty Based Project in Implementation or Completion (ILC 13 Jan 2014)
Protected Areas
15-Jan-2014
Property project locations are indicative only. Points have been cartographically adjusted to illustrate distribution.