Upload
dong-won
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ww.sciencedirect.com
i n t e rn a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n en e r g y 3 9 ( 2 0 1 4 ) 4 6 9 8e4 7 0 3
Available online at w
ScienceDirect
journal homepage: www.elsevier .com/locate/he
PdeCu alloy membrane deposited on CeO2
modified porous nickel support for hydrogenseparation
Shin-Kun Ryi a,*, Hyo-Sun Ahn b, Jong-Soo Park a, Dong-Won Kim c
aEnergy Materials Center, Korea Institute of Energy Research (KIER), 102 Gajeong-ro, Yuseong-gu,
Daejeon 305-343, South KoreabUmicore Korea Limited, 71 3Gongdan 2Ro, Seobukgu, Cheonan 331-200, South KoreacDepartment of Advanced Materials Engineering, Kyonggi University, Suwon, South Korea
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 29 July 2013
Received in revised form
9 September 2013
Accepted 8 November 2013
Available online 12 December 2013
Keywords:
Hydrogen
Separation
Pd-based
Diffusion barrier
Ceria
* Corresponding author. Tel.: þ82 42 860 315E-mail address: [email protected]
0360-3199/$ e see front matter Copyright ªhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.11.0
a b s t r a c t
In this study, the hydrogen permeation behavior of a Pd93eCu7 alloy membrane deposited
on ceria-modified porous nickel support (PNS) was evaluated. PNS, which has an average
pore size of 600 nm, was modified by alumina sol. Alumina sol was prepared using pre-
cursors that had a mean particle size of 300 nm. Alumina-modified PNS was further treated
with ceria sol modification to produce a smoother surface morphology and narrow surface
pores. A 7 mm thick Pd93eCu7 alloy membrane was made on an alumina-modified PNS and
a ceria-finished membrane was fabricated by magnetron sputtering followed by Cu-reflow
at 700 �C for 2 h. SEM analysis showed that the membrane deposited on a ceria-finished
PNS contained more clear grain boundaries than the membrane deposited on the
alumina-modified PNS. The membrane was mounted in a stainless steel permeation cell
with a gold-plated stainless steel O-ring. Permeation tests were then conducted using pure
hydrogen and helium at temperatures ranging from 673 to 773 K and feed side pressures
ranging from 100 to 400 kPa. These tests showed that the membrane had a hydrogen
permeation flux of 2.8 � 10�1 mol m�2 s�1 with H2/He selectivity of >50,000 at a temper-
ature of 773 K and pressure difference of 400 kPa.
Copyright ª 2013, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights
reserved.
1. Introduction
Dense palladium and its alloy membranes have attracted
great attention as an energy-efficient and cost-effective
method for hydrogen separation because of their high
hydrogen permeability, infinite hydrogen selectivity, and
chemical compatibility with other gas mixtures. While
commercially available palladium based self-supported
5; fax: þ82 42 860 3134.(S.-K. Ryi).2013, Hydrogen Energy P31
membranes are often fabricated by the cold rolling method,
utilization of composite structures that consist of a thin
membrane film and porous substrate can reducematerial cost
as well as improve the hydrogen permeation rate. The mate-
rials that have been used for supports include ceramics [1],
glass [2], stainless steel [3], Inconel [4], Hestalloy [5,6], and
nickel [7]. Since porous metal supports have been used to
improve the mechanical strength of the support, they can be
more readily sealed into a commercial unit. However, atomic
ublications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n en e r g y 3 9 ( 2 0 1 4 ) 4 6 9 8e4 7 0 3 4699
interdiffusion of metals between the thin Pd/Pd alloy layer
and the metal components occur during high temperature
processing [3]. Diffusion barriers have been used to prevent
direct contact between the Pd/Pd alloy layer and the metallic
support. The properties of the diffusion barrier in the Pd or Pd
alloy coating are highly important to the performance of the
membrane. The diffusion barrier should be highly porous so
as to increase the membrane surface area and maximize
hydrogen permeation flux. The diffusion barrier should also
be inert not only with metals but also with the gas mixture. In
addition, adhesion between the diffusion barrier and the
metals (palladium layer and support) should be high enough
for to ensure mechanical stability of the membranes. Com-
mon materials that have been used for diffusion barriers
included Al2O3 [3,5,6], ZrO2 [8], yttria stabilized zirconia (YSZ)
[8,9], TiO2 [8], WO3 [10], Cr2O3 [11], CeO2 [12] and TiN [13].
Among these ceramic materials, ceria has a high melting
point (2750 K) and its linear thermal expansion coefficient is
the closest to palladium and nickel as shown in Table 1.
However, there is conflicting information on the use of a ceria
coating as a diffusion barrier because of the difficulty in
obtaining stable ceria sol.
In this study, a porous nickel support (PNS) was modified
with ceria sol prepared using commercially available ceria
powder as a precursor material. The dense PdeCu alloy com-
posite membrane was then prepared on ceria-modified PNS
using the sputtering and Cu-reflow method. Hydrogen perme-
ation tests throughtheas-preparedPdeCumembranewerealso
conducted and the membrane was analyzed by SEM/EDX.
2. Experimental
2.1. Membrane preparation
The PdeCu alloy composite membrane was prepared by
sputtering Pd and Cu on the modified PNS, which was fol-
lowed by Cu-reflow at 700 �C under vacuum (w10�3 bar). PNSs,
whichwere developed by KIER, were used as the substrates for
the PdeCu alloy composite membranes [7]. The PNS used in
this study was made of nickel powder and provided by INCO
Inc. The purity of the nickel was 99.9% with an average par-
ticle size of 3 mm. The nickel powder was pressed and then
coated with an aluminum nitrate solution using the incipient
wetness impregnation method to obtain 0.1 wt.% Al after
Table 1 e Linear thermal expansion coefficient of variousmaterials.
Materials Linear thermal expansion coefficient[10�5 K�1]
Pd 1.17
Cu 1.70
Ag 1.95
Ni 1.30
PSS 1.73
CeO2 1.10
ZrO2 1.00
Al2O3 0.65
TiO2 0.92
drying and calcination at 500 �C for 10 h. 20 g of the alumina-
modified nickel powder was compressed without a binder in a
cylindrical metal mold that had a diameter of 51 mm and
treated at 900 �C for 2 h to obtain a diameter of 50 mm. This
alumina sol coatingmethod can produce PNS that is thermally
stable. In addition, by using this approach, interdiffusion be-
tween the PdeCu alloy layer and nickel substrate at high
temperature (>450 �C) is prevented. As shown in Fig. 1, the
PNS contained micron-sized pores on its surface. Pore distri-
bution analysis using a mercury porosity meter showed that
the average pore size of the PNS was w600 nm. Before ceria-
modification, the pore size of the surface was reduced by the
alumina sol as shown in a previous study [14]. To ensure that
the alumina particles filled the entrance pores of the PNS, a
vacuum was applied to the other side of the PNS and excess
alumina particles on the PNS were carefully removed. The
ceria sol was prepared using precursors with a mean particle
size of<25 nm. 0.05 g of the boehmite powder (Sasol) and 0.1 g
of the ceria powder (Aldrich) were added to 20mL of deionized
water and then dispersed using an ultrasonic agitation for
10 min to prepare the ceria oxide sol. The alumina modified
PNS was coated with the ceria sol using a dip coating method.
After drying at ambient temperature, the ceria modified PNS
was calcined at 700 �C for 2 h under hydrogen. The modifica-
tion process is shown in Fig. 1.
A PdeCu alloy membrane was prepared by sputtering Pd
and Cu on the PNS, which was followed by the Cu-reflow
method. A detailed description of the fabrication methods
used has been described in previous papers [7,15]. The thick-
ness of the PdeCu alloy filmwas controlled to be around 7 mm.
2.2. Permeation measurements
Permeation tests were conducted using pure hydrogen and ni-
trogen at temperatures ranging from 673 to 773 K and feed side
pressures ranging from 100 to 400 kPa. The permeate side was
maintained at ambient pressure. The permeation apparatus
consisted of a membrane module, furnace, temperature
Fig. 1 e Schematic of the modification of porous nickel
support (PNS).
i n t e rn a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n en e r g y 3 9 ( 2 0 1 4 ) 4 6 9 8e4 7 0 34700
controller, pressure gauge/controller and mass flow controller.
Gases were introduced using a mass flow controller (MCF,
Brooks5850Eseries) andthe feedsidepressurewasregulatedby
a pressure controller (Alicat PC series). The temperature was
increased to 623 K at a rate of 3 K/min, while heliumwas being
introduced on both the feed and permeate sides of the mem-
brane in order to prevent the membrane film from being
damaged by the phase change [16,17]. Once the temperature
reached 623 K, hydrogen, instead of He, was introduced on the
feed side. The hydrogen permeation flux and helium leakage
was measured by a digital soap-bubble flow meter (Alltech,
Model 4074) whose detection limit is 1 � 10�2 ml min�1.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Ceramic modification effects
The largestpore sizeon the surface is very importantbecause it
can determine the minimum thickness required to achieve a
pinhole-free Pd-based layer. According to Uemiya’s study, the
thickness of a palladium layer strongly depended on the
quality of the support, such as its pore size distribution and the
amount of defects on the surface [18]. The suggested relation-
ship between the thickness of the Pd layer and pore sizewere a
thickness of 13 mm vs. a pore size of 0.3 mm, 4.5 mm vs. 0.2 mm,
2.2 mm vs. 0.1 mm and 0.8 mm vs. 5 nm. Similarly, Mardilovich
et al. reported that the minimum thickness of palladium
required to achieve a dense layer by electroless plating was
approximately 3 times the diameter of the largest pores in the
Fig. 2 e SEM images of fresh PNS (a), alumina-m
support [19]. The fresh PNS was shown to contain some large
pores (Fig. 2(a)) and its largest pore size was greater than 5 mm.
Based on these results, it can be inferred that a membrane
thickness larger than 15e200 mmwould be required to produce
a pinhole-free Pd-based layer on the fresh PNS. Ryi et al. [5,6]
and Li et al. [3] modified porous Hastelloy and stainless steel
substrates using two different sized aluminum oxide sols
(2.5 mm, 0.3 mm). They could not form a continuous aluminum
oxide layer on the surface of the fresh disc when using the
0.3 mm sized aluminum oxide sol because of the large sized
pores of the disc. However, they were able to achieve pinhole-
free substrates after applying an aluminumoxide coatingwith
the 2.5 mm aluminum oxide sol. In a previous study, we filled
the large pores of PNS using aluminum oxide sol that had a
precursor particle size of 0.3 mm. Because of small pore size
compared with commercially available porous Hastelloy and
stainless steel substrates, our PNS could be successfully
modified with 0.3 mm aluminum oxide sol using a vacuum
assisting method. The alumina-modified PNS is depicted in
Fig. 2(b) and (d), i.e. 10 times magnification in Fig. 2(b). The
surfaceporesand roughness of the coateddiscweredrastically
reduced after applying the aluminum oxide filling.
The alumina-modified PNS was further modified with
<25 nm cerium oxide sol in order to further reduce the pore
size and surface roughness. Fig. 2(c) shows a SEM image of the
ceria-finished PNS. Compared with the alumina-modified
PNS, the ceria-modified PNS contained a smaller pore size
and surface roughness. A cross-sectional SEM image of ceria-
finished PNS shows that the thickness of ceria was w500 nm
(see the sub-figure in Fig. 2(c)). Fig. 3 shows the hydrogen
odified PNS (b, d), and ceria-finished PNS (c).
Fig. 3 e Hydrogen permeation flux of PNS after each
ceramic coating: test was carried at room temperature.
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n en e r g y 3 9 ( 2 0 1 4 ) 4 6 9 8e4 7 0 3 4701
permeation flux of PNS after each coating. After the first
modification step with larger particles, the hydrogen perme-
ation flux of the PNS decreased to w78% of the permeation
flux of the fresh PNS and the hydrogen permeation flux of the
ceria-finished PNS was almost the same as the alumina-
modified PNS because the ceria layer was very thin
(w500 nm). Therefore, the disc remained very permeable after
all pre-treatment stepswith a hydrogen permeance as large as
1.42 � 10�5 mol m�2 s�1 Pa�1. The performance of the ceria-
finished PNS was also tested with nitrogen. The ideal selec-
tivity of hydrogen to nitrogen was determined to be w3.4,
which was very close to the 3.74 ideal value via Knudsen
diffusion, suggesting that no large pores or cracks were pre-
sent in the coating layer. This result also suggests that the
ceria-finished PNS is suitable for preparing thin Pd-based
composite membrane for hydrogen separation.
3.2. Membrane characterization
Images of the surface of the two different membranes after
Cu-reflow are compared in Fig. 4. Themembrane deposited on
Fig. 4 e Surface SEM images of the PdeCu alloy membrane dep
PNS (b).
ceria-finished PNS contained more clear grain boundaries.
SEM analysis results indicated that the PdeCu alloy layer was
well deposited on the surface of the alumina-modified PNS.
No obvious cracks or pinholes were observed on the surface of
the membrane.
3.3. Hydrogen permeation behavior
Before hydrogen permeation behavior tests, the membranes
deposited on alumina-modified PNS and ceria-finished one
were stabilized at 823 K and pressure difference of 100 kPa for
�15 h Fig. 5 compares the hydrogen permeation behavior be-
tween the two membranes. The hydrogen permeation flux of
the membrane on alumina-modified PNS increased as a func-
tion time andwas stabilized after 10 h,while themembrane on
ceria-finished PNS remained constant over the period. Hemra
et al. reported that annealing of palladiummembrane at 973 K
for 8 h in nitrogen atmosphere increased hydrogen perme-
ability and themembrane annealed at higher temperature had
lower surface roughness [20]. After permeation tests, the
morphologies of the membranes were analyzed by SEM and
shown in the sub-figures in Fig. 5. After stabilization, the
morphology of the membrane on ceria-finished PNS was not
changed, while the grain in the membrane on alumina-
modified PNS became clearer than the fresh membrane. The
stabilization tests indicate that the Cu-reflow time of 2 h at
973 K was enough for stabilization of the membrane on ceria-
finished PNS, while the membrane on alumina-modified PNS
needed more annealing time for stabilization.
The hydrogen permeation behavior tests were conducted
with pure hydrogen at temperatures ranging from 678 to 773 K
and at pressure differences across the membrane of
100e400 kPa. Fig. 6 shows the dependency of the hydrogenflux
on the feed side pressure for the prepared composite mem-
brane at various temperatures. As expected, the hydrogen flux
increasedwith increasing temperature and feed side pressure.
The hydrogen flux increased to 2.8 � 10�1 mol m�2 s�1at a
temperature of 773 K and pressure difference of 400 kPa. The
heliumleakageof themembranemeasuredat a temperatureof
773 K and pressure difference of 400 kPa and was below the
detection limit of the digital soap-bubble flow meter
(1� 10�2mlmin�1¼ 4.48� 10�6molm�2 s�1 when considering
osited on alumina-modified PNS (a) and ceria-finished
Fig. 5 e Comparison of permeation behaviors between Al2O3 modified and CeO2 modified membranes at 550 �C: pressuredifference was 100 kPa; sub-figures are surface SEM images after permeation tests.
i n t e rn a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n en e r g y 3 9 ( 2 0 1 4 ) 4 6 9 8e4 7 0 34702
effective membrane area). This indicated the selectivity of H2/
He was >50,000. As shown in Fig. 6, a pressure exponent of 0.5
provided good fits, indicating that the diffusion of hydrogen
atoms through the bulk PdeCu alloy layer is rate-limiting, as in
the well-known Sieverts’ law.
Hydrogen transport through a dense Pd-based alloy
membrane is an activated process and the relationship be-
tween the hydrogen permeability and temperature can be
described by Arrhenius law:
Ql¼ Q0
lexp
��Ea
RT
�(1)
where Q is the hydrogen permeability (mol m m�2 s�1 pa�n), l
is the membrane thickness (m), Ea is the activation energy
(kJ mol�1), R is the universal gas constant (8.314 J mol�1 K�1)
and T is the temperature in Kelvin. The activation energies for
Pd-based membranes have been reported to range from 5.4 to
38 kJ mol�1 [21]. The activation energy is known to be affected
by differences in the microstructure or impurities on the
surface, in the bulk, or at the grain boundaries [22]. The
Fig. 6 e Hydrogen permeation flux as a function of the
difference between the pressure exponent of 0.5 at various
temperatures.
activation energy of the membranes evaluated from the
Arrhenius plot of the overall hydrogen permeability against
the reciprocal temperature in Fig. 7 was 23.1 kJ mol�1 at a
pressure difference of 100 kPa, which is a little bit larger than
the membrane deposited on the alumina-modified PNS
(19.0 kJ mol�1) tested at higher pressure difference (2000 kPa)
[14] and similar to the values reported for other Pd-based
membranes at lower pressures [5,23,24].
4. Conclusions
Analysis of the membrane and hydrogen permeation tests at
high pressure differences for the PdeCu composite mem-
branes deposited on the ceria-finished porous nickel support
with sputtering followed by Cu-reflow revealed that:
� A defect-free PdeCu alloy membrane could be obtained by
sputtering followed by Cu-reflow on the ceria-finished
porous nickel support.
Fig. 7 e Arrhenius plot of overall hydrogen permeability as
a function of reciprocal temperature.
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n en e r g y 3 9 ( 2 0 1 4 ) 4 6 9 8e4 7 0 3 4703
� The hydrogen flux increased up to 2.8 � 10�1 mol m�2 s�1
with H2/He selectivity of >50,000 at a temperature of 773 K
and pressure difference of 400 kPa.
� The membrane had an n-value of 0.5, indicating that
hydrogen permeation is controlled by diffusion in the bulk
PdeCu alloy layer.
� The activation energy of the membranes evaluated from
the Arrhenius plot of the overall hydrogen permeability
against the reciprocal temperature was 23.1 kJ mol�1.
Acknowledgment
This work was conducted under the framework of Research
and Development Program of the Korea Institute of Energy
Research (KIER) (B3-2461-6).
r e f e r e n c e s
[1] Miyamoto M, Hayakawa C, Kamata K, Arakawa M, Uemiya S.Influence of the pre-reformer in steam reforming ofdodecane using a Pd alloy membrane reactor. Int J HydorgenEnerg 2011;36:7771e5.
[2] Bryden KJ, Ying JY. Nanostructured palladium membranesynthesis by magnetron sputtering. Mater Sci Eng A1995;204:140e5.
[3] Li A, Grace JR, Lim CJ. Preparation of thin Pd-based compositemembrane on planar metallic substrate. Part II. Preparationof membranes by electroless plating and characterization. JMembr Sci 2007;306:159e65.
[4] Augustine AS, Ma YH, Kazantzis NK. High pressurepalladium membrane reactor for the high temperaturewater-gas shift reaction. Int J Hydrogen Energ2011;36:5350e60.
[5] Ryi S-K, Xu N, Li A, Lim CJ, Grace JR. Electroless Pd membranedeposition on alumina modified porous Hastelloy substratewith EDTA-free bath. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2010;35:2328e35.
[6] Ryi S-K, Li A, Lim CJ, Grace JR. Novel non-alloy Ru/Pdcomposite membrane fabricated by electroless plating forhydrogen separation. Int J Hydrogen Energ 2011;36:9335e40.
[7] Ryi S-K, Park J-S, Kim S-H, Cho S-H, Park J-S, Kim D-W.Development of a new porous metal support of metallicdense membrane for hydrogen separation. J Membr Sci2006;279:439e45.
[8] Huang Y, Dittmeyer R. Preparation and characterization ofcomposite palladium membranes on sinter-metal supportswith a ceramic barrier against intermetallic diffusion. JMembr Sci 2006;282:296e310.
[9] Zhang K, Gao H, Rui Z, Liu P, Li Y, Lin YS. High-temperaturestability of palladium membranes on porous metal supports
with different intermediate layers. Ind Eng Chem Res2009;48:1880e6.
[10] Zahedi M, Afra B, Dehghani-Mobarake M, Bahmani M.Preparation of a Pd membrane on a WO3 modified porousstainless steel for hydrogen separation. J Membr Sci2009;333:45e9.
[11] Samingprai S, Tantayanon S, Ma YH. Chromium oxideintermetallic diffusion barrier for palladium membranesupported on porous stainless steel. J Membr Sci2010;347:8e16.
[12] Qiao A, Zhang K, Tian Y, Xie L, Luo H, Lin YS, et al. Hydrogenseparation through palladium-copper membranes on porousstainless steel with sol-gel derived ceria as diffusion barrier.Fuel 2010;89:1274e9.
[13] Shu S, Adnot A, Grandjean BPA, Kaliaguine S.Structurally stable composite Pd-Ag alloy membranes:introduction of a diffusion barrier. Thin Solid Film1996;286:72e9.
[14] Ryi S-K, Park J-S, Hwang K-R, Kim D-W, An H-S. Pd-Cu alloymembrane deposited on alumina modified porous nickelsupport (PNS) for hydrogen separation at high pressure.Korean J Chem Eng 2012;29:59e63.
[15] Ryi S-K, Park J-S, Kim S-H, Cho S-H, Kim D-W, Um K-Y.Characterization of Pd-Cu-Ni ternary alloy membraneprepared by magnetron sputtering and Cu-reflow on porousnickel support for hydrogen separation. Sep Purif Technol2006;50:82e91.
[16] Katsnel’son AA, Knyazeva MA, Revkevich GP. Characteristicsof the evolution of defect structure during phasetransformations in the Pd-H system. Phys Solid State1997;38:1132e8.
[17] Okazaki J, Pachco Tanaka DA, Llosa Tanco MA, Wakui Y,Mizukami F, Suzuki TM. Hydrogen permeability study of thethin Pd-Ag alloy membranes in the temperature range acrossthe a-b phase transition. J Membr Sci 2006;282:370e4.
[18] Uemiya S. State-of-the-art of supported metal membranesfor gas separation. Sep Purif Method 1999;28:51e85.
[19] Mardilovich IP, Engwall E, Ma YH. Dependence of hydrogenflux on the pore size and plating surface topology ofasymmetric Pd-porous stainless steel membranes.Desalination 2002;144:85e9.
[20] Hemra K, Kitiwan M, Atong D. Effects of annealingconditions on morphology and permeability of palladiummembrane. Materials Sci Forum 2011;695:25e8.
[21] Ryi S-K. Study of Pd-Cu-Ni ternary alloyed hydrogenmembranes deposited on porous nickel supports [Doctoralthesis]. Korea University; 2007.
[22] Ward TL, Dao T. Model of hydrogen permeation behavior inpalladium membranes. J Membr Sci 1999;153:211e31.
[23] Xomeritakis G, Lin YS. Fabrication of thin metallicmembranes by MOCVD and sputtering. J Membr Sci1997;133:217e30.
[24] Tosti S, Bettinali L, Castelli S, Sarto F, Scaglione S, Violante V.Sputtered, electroless, and rolled palladium-ceramicmembranes. J Membr Sci 2002;196:241e9.