34
PD-L1 Testing German Experience P. Schirmacher for QuIP

PD-L1 Testing German Experiencemedia.aiom.it/userfiles/files/doc/AIOM-Servizi/... · PD-L1 NSCLC; final report EGFR IHC sqNSCLC. final report PD-L1 Melanoma (2) final report T790M

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    11

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • PD-L1 TestingGerman Experience

    P. Schirmacherfor

    QuIP

  • Quality Management Molecular Diagnostics

    • Method/Inter-Center-Optimisation/Validation• Preclinical Validation/internal QM • Accreditation Institutes (DAkkS; ISO 9001 DIN

    17020)• National Round Robins (QuIP)

  • QuiP (DGP)• Independent• Self administered• Non commercial• Expert guided (Panels)• Extensive RR-Expertise (> 300 RRs)• High acceptance (diagnostic community, clinicians, industry,

    politics)• International (in selected indications)• ESP-LOA and cooperation

  • Free Choice of Method, e.g.• Sanger• Pyro-Sequencing• Mutation-spezifische PCR• NGS (Deep/Panel

    Sequencing)Reflection of technologyEvaluation by diagnostic result

    Principle: Free Choice of Methods

  • Constant Round Robins2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

    RfB BRAF 600 BRAF 600 BRAF 600 BRAF 600RfB CD117 CD117 CD117 CD117 CD117 CD117 CD117 CD117RfB EGFR EGFR EGFRRfB Erez/PRez Erez/PRez Erez/PRez Erez/PRez Erez/PRez Erez/PRez Erez/PRezRfB GIST GIST GIST GIST GISTRfB HER2n IHC HER2n IHC HER2n IHC HER2n IHC HER2n IHCRfB HER2n ISH HER2n ISH HER2n ISH HER2n ISH HER2n ISHRfB Keratine Keratine Keratine Keratine Keratine Keratine Keratine KeratineRfB KlonML KlonML KlonML KlonML KlonML KlonML KlonMLRfB KRASRfB Lymphome Lymphome Lymphome Lymphome Lymphome Lymphome Lymphome LymphomeRfB MMRD MMRD MMRD MMRD MMRD MMRD MMRD MMRDRfB MSI MSI MSI MSI MSI MSI MSIRfB NEM NEM NEM NEM NEM NEM NEM NEMRfB RAS RAS RAS RASmultiblock ER ER ER ER ER ER ER ERmultiblock PR PR PR PR PR PR PR PRmultiblock Her2-IM Her2-IM Her2-IM Her2-IM Her2-IM Her2-IM Her2-IM Her2-IMmultiblock Her2-ISH Her2-ISH Her2-ISH Her2-ISH Her2-ISH Her2-ISH Her2-ISH Her2-ISHmultiblock Ki-67 Ki-67 Ki-67 Ki-67 Ki-67 Ki-67 Ki-67 Ki-67provitro HPV HPV HPV HPV HPV HPV HPV HPVprovitro TBc TBc TBc TBc TBc TBc TBc TBcRfB T790M T790MRfB PD-L1MMRfB PD-L1 NSCLC PD-L1 NSCLC

    RfBEGFR IHC sqNSCLC

    RfB BRCA1/2 BRCA1/2RfB BRAF 600 Lunge

  • Round Robin Status

    T790M 2016 finished

    PD-L1 NSCLC final report

    EGFR IHC sqNSCLC

    final report

    PD-L1 Melanoma(2)

    final report

    T790M 2017 (2) ongoing Q1-Q2

    PD-L1 NSCLC (2) ongoing Q1-Q2

    BRAF V600 (2) planned Q3-Q4

    BRCA 1/2 (2) planned Q3-Q4

    Prototypic Round Robins

    Round Robin Status

    MLH1ConsiderationQuIP-Board

    ROS1ConsiderationQuIP-Board

    IDH1(R132H) ConsiderationQuIP-Board

  • Implementation of new Diagnostic Assays

    Quality Management• Panel-establishment and -validation (> 3 m)

    • Establishment of expert panel (n~5-8; Lead-Institutes; other Panel centers)

    • Consent about approach (methodology, time schedule, testing conditions etc.)

    • Identification and selection of suitable test cases• Cross validation by lead institutes• Testing/validation of panel centers; evaluation;

    set-up of RR conditions

    • National/international round robin (> 2 m)• announcement/feed-back; application• preparation by Lead-institutes, RfB• Probe mailing, testing, test results mailed• Evaluation and publication

    Information about approval of new drug with predictive molecular testing (1-3 months ahead)

    Implementation• Validation and optimisation of testing

    modalities• Solutions for open scientific issues• Diagnostic recommendations, information,

    discussion with clinical societies• Diagnostics for early accession/

    compassionate use programs• Broad/nationwide availability (methodology,

    expertise, training)• Agreement on reimbursement issues• Local issues• Others (e.g. legal issues)

    Implementation without regulatory, financial and intellectual framework but decisive for drug/therapy success (system relevant).Requires Competence Center System (Peers) and more attention by industry and regulatory authorities

  • PD-L1 IHCGerman Strategy for Roll-out and QM

    • National Harmonisation Study (DGP)– Validation– Harmonisation– Recommendation

    • National QA Measures (QuIP)– Quality Assurance– Teaching and Training

    • National Improvement Activity (nNGM/DKH)

  • Pathology: Industrial PartnersReinhard Büttner BMSManfred Dietel MSDLukas Heukamp RocheKorinna Jöhrens AstraZenecaThomas Kirchner VentanaSimone Reu DakoJosef Rüschoff TargosAndreas ScheelHans-Ulrich SchildhausPeter SchirmacherMarkus TiemannArne WarthWilko Weichert

    PD-L1 IHC in NSCLCNational Harmonisation-Study

  • Response to Anti PD-1 (Pembrolizumab) and Expression of PD-L1 in NSCLC

  • Different Antibodies and Antibody Reactivities

    Scheel et al., 2016

  • Tumorimmunotherapy: PDL-1-Testing

  • Besse et al, Oral Presentation at ECC 2015

    BIRCH: PD-L1 TC and IC Selection Criteria

    • BIRCH enrolled patients with tumors that were PD-L1 TC2/3 or IC2/3– VENTANA SP142 IHC assay was used to determine PD-L1 expression on both TC and IC – Archival or freshly collected tumor specimens were required for PD-L1 testing at a

    central laboratory

    • PD-L1 as a predictive biomarker:– PD-L1 expression on TC and IC was independently predictive of response in patients with previously

    treated NSCLC (i.e., POPLAR)1,2

    Intrinsic PD-L1 expression in tumor cells (TC)

    Adaptive PD-L1 expression in tumor-infiltrating immune

    cells (IC)

    TC3 or IC3 = TC ≥ 50% or IC ≥ 10% PD-L1+ cells; TC2/3 or IC2/3 = TC or IC ≥ 5% PD-L1+ cells, respectively.1. Horn L, et al. ASCO 2015; 2. Vansteenkiste J, et al. ECC 2015.

    IC2/3TC2/3

    34% of screened patients between

    Jan. 2014 and Dec. 2014

  • A Global NSCLC-PDL1 Score?

    Scheel et al., 2016

  • Interobserver-Validation (Phase I)

    Scheel et al., 2016

  • Harmonisation Study: Immune Cells

    Scheel AH et al., Modern Pathology 2016

  • Assays:

    - Performance in multiple Institutes / Reliability

    - Staining pattern - validation of Phase 1; fixed assay

    vs. open protocol

    - Inter-lab concordance

    Evaluation:

    - Validation proportional score (6-step)

    - Local vs. central evaluation

    Phase 2

  • - Trial analog protocolsDako 22C3, 28-8Ventana SP142, SP263

    - Open protocol: 22C3, 28-8(local protocols)

    - ≥3 institutes per protocol

    TargosMolecular Pathology;

    8 PathologyInstitutes

    Phase 2

    - Project management Phase 2

    - NSCLC-TMAs (project specific):- 'TMA-Master' (3DHistotech)- 1.5 mm cores

    - Central provision of slides

  • PD-L1 Testing

    +• Robust, broadly available

    technology (IHC)• Good antibodies;

    alternatives exist• Robust, relatively stable

    assay• Consented algorithm

    -• Stand-alone assay/ no

    methodical convergence• Singular analyses• Algorithm/reporting

    complexity; dynamic• Heterogenous expression;

    1% threshold problematic• Insufficient refunding

  • Prototypic Round RobinPD-L1-NSCLC (1)

    28.4.16 Decision for RR, Lead- andPanel Institutes6.16 Coordination of Lead Institutes, selection of cases, trilateral validation15.7-26.7. Testing of the Panel Institutes (internal RR)27.7. -29.7. Evaluation of internal RR-results, Lead/Panel-Institute; meeting, decision for open RR15.9 Public PD-L1 training meeting(Charite)End of 9.16 Open RR

    Lead Institutes: Berlin, Cologne, GöttingenPanel Institutes: Hannover, Heidelberg, Jena, Munich TU, Munich LMUComposition: 10 cases; 2 pointseach, 18 points necessary forcertificateNo methodical restriction, sectionsprovidedOptional reporting of methodologyOption to challenge and foreducational

  • Prototypic Round RobinPD-L1-NSCLC (1)

    • Participants: 83 (76 D, 4 A, 3 CH)

    • Successful: 60

    • Success rate: 72%

    Composition

    < 1%: 3 cases

    1%-49%: 2 cases

    50-100 %: 5 cases

    Diagramm1

    836023

    gesamt

    mit Erfolg teilgenommen

    teilgenommen

    Sheet1

    gesamt83

    mit Erfolg teilgenommen60

    teilgenommen23

  • PD-L1-NSCLC Round RobinAntibodies

  • PD-L1-NSCLC Challenge

    Challenged result: 18 Institutes

    • 1 Institute post hoc success

    • 4 Institutes: Interpretation problems

    • 13 Institutes: Staining problems

  • Prototypic Round RobinMalignant Melanoma (1)

    3.8 Panel-Institutes.16 Decision forRR22.8.16 Decision on Lead- and Panel Institutes9/10.16 Coordination of Lead Institutes, Case selection andreciprocal testing14-28.10 Testing of Panel Institutes (internal RR)9/10 Announcement of open RR9.-25.11.16 open RR28.11-2.12. Evaluation of open RR; announcement of results

    Lead Institutes: Berlin, Heidelberg, TU MunichPanel Institutes: Hannover, MunichLMU, Cologne, Hamburg, Göttingen, WürzburgComposition: 10 cases; 2 pointseach, 18 points necessary forcertificateNo methodical restriction, sectionsprovidedOptional reporting of methodologyOption to challenge and foreducational

  • Prototypic Round RobinPD-L1-Melanoma

    • Participants: 44

    • Successful: 37

    • Success rate: 84%

    Composition

    5%: 5 cases

  • PD-L1-Melanoma Round RobinAntibodies

  • PD-L1-NSCLC and MM Round RobinOther Conclusions

    • Diverse use of primary antibodies

    • 28-8 and SP263 stain stronger

    • 22C3 stains rather weaker

    • Discrepancies are rather towards lower stainingintensities

    • Establishment using tonsil tissue suggested

  • Future and Ongoing Activities

    • PD-L1-NSCLC (2) ongoing (until 15.5.)• PD-L1 Bladder Cancer – in preparation• PD-L1 MM (2) – in discussion

  • Other/Better Markers!?

    • PD-L1 Gene CNV/expression• MSI• Mutational load• Immunophenotyping• Combinations• RESISTANCE MARKERS

  • PD-L1 Amplifications/Deletions and/or Mutational Load

    Increasing number of mutations

    n=78n=40

    Budczies et al. 2016

    WGS/WES?

    Panels?

    Others?

  • Immune Cell Infiltration and Response to Conventional and Personalized Treatment

    Lasitschka, F, Schirmacher P, Jäger D, Halama N, et al.

  • Constant Round Robins

    RR

    Participants 2016

    RR

    Participants 2016

    BRAF 58 ER 186

    CD117 66 PR 177

    GIST 39 Her2-IM 198

    Her2nlHC 88 Her2-ISH 103

    Her2nlSH 52 Ki-67 177

    RAS 71

    Lymphone 71 HPV 7

    MMRD 84 TBC 14

    MSI 45

    Keratine 88

    KlonML 29

    NEM 69

    EGFR 48

    PD-L1 Testing�German ExperienceQuality Management Molecular DiagnosticsQuiP (DGP)Diapositiva numero 4Constant Round Robins�Diapositiva numero 6Diapositiva numero 7PD-L1 IHC�German Strategy for Roll-out and QMPD-L1 IHC in NSCLC�National Harmonisation-StudyDiapositiva numero 10Different Antibodies and Antibody ReactivitiesTumorimmunotherapy: PDL-1-TestingDiapositiva numero 13A Global NSCLC-PDL1 Score?Interobserver-Validation (Phase I)Diapositiva numero 16Diapositiva numero 17Diapositiva numero 18PD-L1 TestingPrototypic Round Robin�PD-L1-NSCLC (1)�Prototypic Round Robin�PD-L1-NSCLC (1)�PD-L1-NSCLC Round Robin�AntibodiesPD-L1-NSCLC �ChallengePrototypic Round Robin�Malignant Melanoma (1)�Prototypic Round Robin�PD-L1-MelanomaPD-L1-Melanoma Round Robin�AntibodiesPD-L1-NSCLC and MM Round Robin�Other ConclusionsFuture and Ongoing ActivitiesOther/Better Markers!?PD-L1 Amplifications/Deletions and/or Mutational LoadImmune Cell Infiltration and Response to Conventional and Personalized TreatmentDiapositiva numero 32Diapositiva numero 33Constant Round Robins�