17
Passivhaus vs. Creativity?

Passivhaus vs. Creativity?...Passive design does not replace architectural design Challenges in making New skills – understanding airtightness, thermal performance and bridging

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Passivhaus vs. Creativity?...Passive design does not replace architectural design Challenges in making New skills – understanding airtightness, thermal performance and bridging

Passivhaus vs. Creativity?

Page 2: Passivhaus vs. Creativity?...Passive design does not replace architectural design Challenges in making New skills – understanding airtightness, thermal performance and bridging

Let’s Talk About the Issues

Standard

Airtight

Pioneering

Physics

MVHR

High performing

Precise

Energy

Comfort

On-site monitoring

Criteria

Third-party certified

Cost

Page 3: Passivhaus vs. Creativity?...Passive design does not replace architectural design Challenges in making New skills – understanding airtightness, thermal performance and bridging

Let’s Talk About the Issues

Standard

Airtight

Pioneering

Physics

MVHR

High performing

Precise

Energy

Comfort

On-site monitoring

Criteria

Third-party certified

Cost

Page 4: Passivhaus vs. Creativity?...Passive design does not replace architectural design Challenges in making New skills – understanding airtightness, thermal performance and bridging

Comfort – our responsibility

Page 5: Passivhaus vs. Creativity?...Passive design does not replace architectural design Challenges in making New skills – understanding airtightness, thermal performance and bridging

Energy – is Passivhaus necessary?

Source: Passivhaus Trust, 2019

v.fenwick-Moore
Text Box
http://www.passivhaustrust.org.uk/guidance_detail.php?gId=41
Page 6: Passivhaus vs. Creativity?...Passive design does not replace architectural design Challenges in making New skills – understanding airtightness, thermal performance and bridging

The Good Stuff

• Informed decisions

• Bottom up approach

• On site monitoring and third party certification

• Energy resilience

• Simplicity of use and function

Page 7: Passivhaus vs. Creativity?...Passive design does not replace architectural design Challenges in making New skills – understanding airtightness, thermal performance and bridging

The Challenges

• Aesthetics and pull towards box-like buildings

• Inherent difficulty in achieving desirable spaces, particularly upper floor externals

• Design and construction rigour

• Early design/Design cost

• Lacking widespread skills

Page 8: Passivhaus vs. Creativity?...Passive design does not replace architectural design Challenges in making New skills – understanding airtightness, thermal performance and bridging

Croft Gardens, Cambridge

Page 9: Passivhaus vs. Creativity?...Passive design does not replace architectural design Challenges in making New skills – understanding airtightness, thermal performance and bridging

Passivhaus design requirements were made part of the project at an early stage Another design complexity, among others Brownfield, semi-urban site added further design constraints, including: - Acoustics - Orientation - Cost - Planning - Landscape

Croft Gardens, Cambridge

Page 10: Passivhaus vs. Creativity?...Passive design does not replace architectural design Challenges in making New skills – understanding airtightness, thermal performance and bridging

Design ‘work’

Design for airtightness

Higher levels of thermal performance

Some material limitations

Quality of detailing

More intensive focus on cold bridging

Quality of workmanship

Page 11: Passivhaus vs. Creativity?...Passive design does not replace architectural design Challenges in making New skills – understanding airtightness, thermal performance and bridging

Design ‘challenges’

Care not to move too far into a diluted ‘fabric first’ approach – needs to work with MEP systems and building as well

Harder to gain recesses / façade modelling

Limitations of products

Orientation

Working closely with the idea of windows in wall

Don’t forget the ‘other’ stuff!

Page 12: Passivhaus vs. Creativity?...Passive design does not replace architectural design Challenges in making New skills – understanding airtightness, thermal performance and bridging

Design positives

Mass, solidity, tends toward simple forms

Can use alternative products but need to additional work

Clarity of ‘zones’ and ‘lines’ within fabric has benefits in construction

Resilience of design

Design with quality, hopefully for longevity

Simplicity

Page 13: Passivhaus vs. Creativity?...Passive design does not replace architectural design Challenges in making New skills – understanding airtightness, thermal performance and bridging

Kellogg College, Oxford

Page 14: Passivhaus vs. Creativity?...Passive design does not replace architectural design Challenges in making New skills – understanding airtightness, thermal performance and bridging

Lessons learnt

Simple form

Maximised orientation

Challenges of rooflights

Terminations to air in brickwork

Strategic detailing – relationships, positioning and consistency

Thermal efficiency

Page 15: Passivhaus vs. Creativity?...Passive design does not replace architectural design Challenges in making New skills – understanding airtightness, thermal performance and bridging

Style vs. Function?

Passive design does not replace architectural design

Challenges in making

New skills – understanding airtightness, thermal performance and bridging.

Materials and products

Importance of sharing process with teams

Page 16: Passivhaus vs. Creativity?...Passive design does not replace architectural design Challenges in making New skills – understanding airtightness, thermal performance and bridging

“I have never been forced to accept compromises but I have willingly

accepted constraints.” -Charles Eames

Page 17: Passivhaus vs. Creativity?...Passive design does not replace architectural design Challenges in making New skills – understanding airtightness, thermal performance and bridging

We Need You