12
PASA REPORT 2019 Melanie Johnston-Hollitt, Editor in Chief, Curtin, Australia Daniel Price, Deputy Editor, Monash, Australia Alexander Heger, Monash, Australia Stas Shabala, Tasmania, Australia Michele Trenti, Melbourne, Australia Stephen Sarjeant, Open University, UK Katie Auchettl, Niels Bohr Institute, Denmark

PASA REPORT 2019asa.astronomy.org.au/council_reports/Editor2019.pdf · 2019-07-10 · ACCEPTANCE RATES AND TIMES The acceptance rate for 2018 was 43%and the effective rejection rate

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: PASA REPORT 2019asa.astronomy.org.au/council_reports/Editor2019.pdf · 2019-07-10 · ACCEPTANCE RATES AND TIMES The acceptance rate for 2018 was 43%and the effective rejection rate

PASA REPORT 2019Melanie Johnston-Hollitt, Editor in Chief,

Curtin, Australia

Daniel Price, Deputy Editor, Monash, AustraliaAlexander Heger, Monash, AustraliaStas Shabala, Tasmania, AustraliaMichele Trenti, Melbourne, AustraliaStephen Sarjeant, Open University, UKKatie Auchettl, Niels Bohr Institute, Denmark

Page 2: PASA REPORT 2019asa.astronomy.org.au/council_reports/Editor2019.pdf · 2019-07-10 · ACCEPTANCE RATES AND TIMES The acceptance rate for 2018 was 43%and the effective rejection rate

JOURNAL PERFORMANCE: IMPACT FACTOR➤ PASA’s Impact Factor continues to

rise with the lasses results just out showing an increase to 4.878.

➤ PASA thus continues for a second year as a top quartile astronomical journal.

➤ My thanks to my fellow EB members for this.

➤ PASA’s success is only a reflection of the support of the community in submitting high-quality papers - so this success belongs to all the PASA authors!

22

3

23

3

45 5

0

1.75

3.5

5.25

7

8.75

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Two year impact factorPASA PASJ PASP A&A MNRAS ApJ

Page 3: PASA REPORT 2019asa.astronomy.org.au/council_reports/Editor2019.pdf · 2019-07-10 · ACCEPTANCE RATES AND TIMES The acceptance rate for 2018 was 43%and the effective rejection rate

0 0

11

1 11

1

22

1

3

4

2

2

3

2

3

3

4

5

5

0

2

4

6

8

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Two year impact factor - complete historyPASA PASJ PASP A&A MNRAS ApJ

Page 4: PASA REPORT 2019asa.astronomy.org.au/council_reports/Editor2019.pdf · 2019-07-10 · ACCEPTANCE RATES AND TIMES The acceptance rate for 2018 was 43%and the effective rejection rate

JOURNAL PERFORMANCE: PAPERS PUBLISHED➤ In 2018 we published 49 papers which

was down from 70 in 2017.

➤ However the total number of published pages increased.

➤ This speaks to fact that PASA is publishing, longer, higher impact papers than in previous years.

➤ ASA Council approved an increase in the pages published to 1140 per annum.

60

82

4853

5865

7264

40

19 2025

6354

32

4954

50 48

6270

49

0

22.5

45

67.5

90

1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017

PASA number of papers published per year

Page 5: PASA REPORT 2019asa.astronomy.org.au/council_reports/Editor2019.pdf · 2019-07-10 · ACCEPTANCE RATES AND TIMES The acceptance rate for 2018 was 43%and the effective rejection rate

JOURNAL PERFORMANCE: CITATIONS ➤ 2018: 49 papers with 302 citations. 38/49 with at least 1 citation.

➤ 2017: 70 papers with 316 citations. 57/70 with at least 1 citation

➤ 2016: 62 papers with 332 citations. 50/62 with at least 1 citation.

➤ 2018: 6.1 citations per paper, 77.5% with at least 1 citation

➤ 2017: 4.5 citations per paper, 81% with at least 1 citation

➤ 2016: 5.3 citations per paper, 80.5% with at least 1 citation

➤ These data suggest the IF remains on an upward trajectory.

Page 6: PASA REPORT 2019asa.astronomy.org.au/council_reports/Editor2019.pdf · 2019-07-10 · ACCEPTANCE RATES AND TIMES The acceptance rate for 2018 was 43%and the effective rejection rate

ACCEPTANCE RATES AND TIMES➤ The acceptance rate for 2018 was 43% and the effective rejection rate was 50% (43%

based on Editorial decisions, 7% withdraws or lapses).

➤ The rejection rate has remained fairly constant over the last 3 years. The acceptance rate has decreased from 50.6% (2017) and 58.5% (2016)

➤ The ave. time from submission to acceptance was 117 days in the first half of 2018 and 138 days in the second half. The average time from submission to acceptance for papers with a single revision was 68 days.

➤ The ave. time from submission to first decision was 50 days compared with 34.5 in 2017 and 36 days in 2016. However, the ave. time from submission to a first decision was 40 days in the first half of 2018, which demonstrates an increase in processing time in the second half of 2018. This has been traced to 3 reasons.

Page 7: PASA REPORT 2019asa.astronomy.org.au/council_reports/Editor2019.pdf · 2019-07-10 · ACCEPTANCE RATES AND TIMES The acceptance rate for 2018 was 43%and the effective rejection rate

REASONS FOR INCREASED PROCESSING TIME IN Q3 AND Q4 2018➤ 1) Periods in which the Editorial Board were on leave

➤ 2) Referee Fatigue

➤ 3) Technical issues for papers on which the EiC is a co-author

➤ EB leave: July holidays and the Christmas/New Year break were two periods with markedly decreased processing times for papers. For July this will be addressed with an Editorial Board calendar. For Christmas there is very little that can be done. During that time the entire EB and most of the referees are on leave. Yet this is also when submissions increase (there is a peak just before Christmas). Either people need to understand that processing will be slower over Christmas and New Year or PASA should stop accepting manuscripts from mid Dec - mid Jan.

Page 8: PASA REPORT 2019asa.astronomy.org.au/council_reports/Editor2019.pdf · 2019-07-10 · ACCEPTANCE RATES AND TIMES The acceptance rate for 2018 was 43%and the effective rejection rate

REASONS FOR INCREASED PROCESSING TIME IN Q3 AND Q4 2018➤ Referee Fatigue: We have seen a increase in referee fatigue where referees either

take far longer than the notional 3-weeks to review, or bail on their reviews after 6 weeks.

➤ Solution: PASA has a tendency to have more senior referees who are time poor. What we need is to expand the referring pool to ECRs. So will issue a call for potential PASA reviewers who are ECRs to nominate or be nominated.

➤ Technical issues for papers on which the EiC is a co-author: this is an issue with ScholarOne. It can only be managed by co-authors and the EiC being proactive about notifying CUP of paper delays, requesting manual intervention. Unfortunately since the EiC is on several PASA papers, this was a significant issue for averaging processing times.

Page 9: PASA REPORT 2019asa.astronomy.org.au/council_reports/Editor2019.pdf · 2019-07-10 · ACCEPTANCE RATES AND TIMES The acceptance rate for 2018 was 43%and the effective rejection rate

VALUE ADDED SERVICED➤ The PASA Data Store continues to be

available to deposit data files associated with papers. This service is provided by the gSTAR Data Management Service

➤ The Overleaf trial was concluded and Overleaf will now be a regular service for PASA submitters.

➤ CUP implemented the use of ORCIDs for the submitting author of PASA papers in May. This will allow better tracking of papers and associations with funding.

Page 10: PASA REPORT 2019asa.astronomy.org.au/council_reports/Editor2019.pdf · 2019-07-10 · ACCEPTANCE RATES AND TIMES The acceptance rate for 2018 was 43%and the effective rejection rate

2018 SCIENCE HIGHLIGHTS”SkyMapper Southern Survey: First Data Release (DR1)”, by Wolf et al. with 70 citations since Feb 2018“Phantom: A smoothed particle hydrodynamics and magnetohydrodynamics code for astrophysics” by Price et al., which is in press is a landmark publication describing the Phantom code which is significant piece of work and has 60 citations since September 2018

“Source Finding in the Era of the SKA (Precursors): Aegean 2.0” by Hancock et al. with 21 citations since March 2018

In addition, Wolf et al. “Discovery of the Most Ultra-Luminous QSO Using GAIA, SkyMapper, and WISE” generated a large amount of media attention.

Page 11: PASA REPORT 2019asa.astronomy.org.au/council_reports/Editor2019.pdf · 2019-07-10 · ACCEPTANCE RATES AND TIMES The acceptance rate for 2018 was 43%and the effective rejection rate

EDITORIAL BOARDMelanie Johnston-Hollitt, Curtin University, Australia (Editor-in-Chief)

Daniel Price, Monash University, Australia (Deputy Editor)

Alexander Heger, Monash University, Australia (Associate Editor)

Michele Trenti, U. Melb, Australia (Associate Editor)

Stephen Sarjeant, Open University, UK (Associate Editor)

Stas Shabala, University of Tasmania, Australia (Associate Editor)

Katie Auchettl, Niels Bohr Institute, Denmark( Associate Editor)

Next call for Board members will be in October 2019 to replace Heger.

Page 12: PASA REPORT 2019asa.astronomy.org.au/council_reports/Editor2019.pdf · 2019-07-10 · ACCEPTANCE RATES AND TIMES The acceptance rate for 2018 was 43%and the effective rejection rate

POLICY BREACH➤ In Q2 2019 we had a serious submission policy breach.

➤ ASA members are reminded that 1) papers can only be submitted to PASA with the explicit permission of all authors and 2) it is the responsibility of all authors to ensure the contents of papers are suitable for publication.

➤ It is not the job of PASA’s EB to deal with external collaboration disputes after publication.

➤ PASA is happy to work with authors to address issues where they do arise.

➤ PASA is committed to support high-quality papers from the Australian and global communities and welcomes team papers, particularly those that are Australian-led.